Robotic Approach to Combined Anatomic Pulmonary Subsegmentectomy: Technical Aspects and Early Results

Sublobar resection for small-sized non-small cell lung cancer: A comprehensive comparison between subsegmentectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection

OBJECTIVES

Subsegmentectomy has been adopted for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for decades. This study aimed to compare the features between subsegmentectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection for NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

NSCLC patients who underwent subsegmentectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively screened. Demographic, radiomic, and perioperative characteristics between patients were compared. Further, log-rank test, univariate and multivariate Cox regression were used for prognostic evaluation.

RESULTS

There were 276, 670, and 494 patients undergoing subsegmentectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection, respectively. Patients with segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy had larger tumor sizes and greater distances to the pleura than those with wedge resection. Subsegmentectomy and segmentectomy were more likely to achieve adequate surgical margins than wedge resection (82.0 % vs. 79.5 % vs. 64.7 %, P < 0.001), which was especially true for nodules away from the pleura (80.2 % vs. 81.4 % vs. 55.8 %, P < 0.001). In addition, anatomic resection allowed for more lymph node dissection and required less preoperative localization than wedge reception. Subsegmentectomy preserved about two subsegments than segmentectomy (P < 0.001). The incidence of prolonged air leakage after subsegmentectomy (3.3 %) and wedge (1.8 %) was similar (P = 0.308). Notably, 66.8 % of patients who underwent segmentectomy or subsegmentectomy were considered unsuitable for wedge. During the follow-up (55.1 months), no tumor recurrence or death occurred in patients undergoing subsegmentectomy. No significant recurrence-free survival (P = 0.140) or overall survival (P = 0.370) difference existed between these groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Subsegmentectomy could achieve more adequate surgical margins than wedge resection and showed superiority for deep nodules. Compared to segmentectomy, subsegmentectomy could preserve more lung parenchyma.

Association between the Preoperative Standard Uptake Value (SUV) and Survival Outcomes after Robotic-Assisted Segmentectomy for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

BACKGROUND

Lung-sparing procedures, specifically segmentectomies and wedge resections, have increased over the years to treat early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigate here the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent robotic-assisted segmentectomy (RAS) at an NCI-designated cancer center and aim to show associations between the preoperative standard update value (SUV) to tumor stage, recurrence patterns, and overall survival.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 166 consecutive patients who underwent RAS at a single institution from 2010 to 2021. Of this number, 121 robotic-assisted segmentectomies were performed for primary NSCLC, and a total of 101 patients were evaluated with a PET-CT scan. The SUV from the primary tumor was determined from the PET-CT. The clinical, surgical, and pathologic profiles and perioperative outcomes were summarized via descriptive statistics. Numerical variables were described as the median and interquartile range because all numerical variables were not normally distributed as assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality. Categorical variables were described as the count and proportion. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used for association. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were constructed to visualize the OS and RFS, which were also stratified according to tumor histology, the pathologic stage, and standard uptake value. A log-rank test for the equality of survival curves was performed to determine significant differences between groups.

RESULTS

The most common postoperative complications were atrial fibrillation (8.8%, 9/102), persistent air leak (7.84%, 8/102), and pneumonia (4.9%, 5/102). The median operative duration was 168.5 min (IQR 59), while the median estimated blood loss was 50 mL (IQR 125). The conversion rate to thoracotomy in this cohort was 3.9% (4/102). Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.9% (3/102). The median hospital length of stay was 3 days (IQR 3). The median chest tube duration was 3 days (IQR 2), but 4.9% (5/102) of patients were sent home with a chest tube. The recurrence for this cohort was 28.4% (29/102). The time to recurrence was 353 days (IQR 504), while the time to mortality was 505 days (IQR 761). The NSCLC patients were divided into the following two groups: low SUV (<5, n = 55) and high SUV (≥5, n = 47). Statistically significant associations were noted between SUV and the tumor histology (p = 0.019), tumor grade (p = 0.002), lymph-vascular invasion (p = 0.029), viscera-pleural invasion (p = 0.008), recurrence (p < 0.001) and the site of recurrence (p = 0.047). KM survival analysis showed significant differences in the curves for OS (log-rank p-value 0.0204) and RFS (log-rank p-value 0.0034) between the SUV groups.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted segmentectomy for NSCLC has reasonable perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Furthermore, we demonstrate here the prognostic implication of preoperative SUV to pathologic outcomes, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival.

[Complications after pulmonary segmentectomy: Impact of the surgical approach]

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary segmentectomy is becoming increasingly widespread but remains technically challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the surgical approach applied on postoperative complications after pulmonary segmentectomy.

METHODS

All patients having undergone pulmonary segmentectomy by thoracotomy, videothoracoscopy or robot-assisted surgery from 1st January 2018 to 31st December 2021 were included. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of postoperative complications. Secondary endpoints were operative time, length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission rate, 30-day and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-three patients were included, 30% (n=67) in the thoracotomy group, 9.4% (n=21) in the videothoracoscopy group and 60.5% (n=135) in the robot-assisted surgery group. There was no difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications according to type of approach (P=0.564), 26.9% of patients (n=60) had at least one postoperative complication. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of operative time (P=0.385), length of hospital stay (P=0.107), 30 and 90-day mortality (P=0.124 and P=0.249, respectively). Mini-invasive surgery significantly reduced the 30-day readmission rate (P=0.049).

CONCLUSION

The surgical approach applied does not influence the postoperative complications of pulmonary segmentectomy.

Learning curve analysis of single-port thoracoscopic combined subsegmental resections

Background

Combined subsegmental surgery (CSS) is considered to be a safe and effective resection modality for early-stage lung cancer. However, there is a lack of a clear definition of the technical difficulty classification of this surgical case, as well as a lack of reported analyzes of the learning curve of this technically demanding surgical approach.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of single-port thoracoscopic CSS performed by the same surgeon between April 2016 and September 2019. The combined subsegmental resections were divided into simple and complex groups according to the difference in the number of arteries or bronchi which need to be dissected. The operative time, bleeding and complications were analyzed in both groups. Learning curves were obtained using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method and divided into different phases to assess changes in the surgical characteristics of the entire case cohort at each phase.

Results

The study included 149 cases, including 79 in the simple group and 70 in the complex group. The median operative time in the two groups was 179 min (IQR, 159-209) and 235 min (IQR, 219-247) p < 0.001, respectively. And the median postoperative drainage was 435 mL (IQR, 279-573) and 476 mL (IQR, 330-750), respectively, with significant differences in postoperative extubation time and postoperative length of stay. According to the CUSUM analysis, the learning curve for the simple group was divided by the inflection point into 3 phases: Phase I, learning phase (1st to 13th operation); Phase II, consolidation phase (14th to 27th operation), and Phase III, experience phase (28th to 79th operation), with differences in operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and length of hospital stay in each phase. The curve inflection points of the learning curve for the complex group were located in the 17th and 44th cases, with significant differences in operative time and postoperative drainage between the stages.

Conclusion

The technical difficulties of the simple group of single-port thoracoscopic CSS could be overcome after 27 cases, while the technical ability of the complex group of CSS to ensure feasible perioperative outcomes was achieved after 44 operations.

Subsegmentectomy versus segmentectomy resection for the treatment of operable patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Background

There were new points of interest in performing subsegmentectomy and segmentectomy for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether patients who underwent subsegmentectomy could obtain satisfactory clinical outcomes remains unclear. The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and security of surgical procedures between subsegmentectomy and segmentectomy.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed through five online databases to identify the included literatures which presented intact clinical outcome data among different surgical procedures. The included studies were evaluated based on precise and predefined inclusion criteria.

Results

There were 4 published studies identified in this meta-analysis. A total of 325 patients who underwent subsegmentectomy and 904 patients who underwent segmentectomy were involved in this analysis. The duration of drainage [MD -0.19; 95%CI (-0.36, -0.02), p = 0.03] and postoperative hospital stay [MD -0.30; 95%CI (-0.58, -0.02), p = 0.009] of subsegmentectomy were significantly less than that of segmentectomy. There was no statistically significant difference among recurrence rate [OR 0.85; 95%CI (0.21, 3.42), p = 0.82], operation time, blood loss, incidence of complications [OR 0.83; 95%CI (0.58, 1.20), p = 0.33] between subsegmentectomy and segmentectomy in patients with stage IA NSCLC.

Conclusion

The meta-analysis was firstly performed to compare perioperative outcomes among surgical procedures. The perioperative outcomes were comparable between subsegmentectomy and segmentectomy. Subsegmentectomy might be an alternative treatment for the deep tumor with size less than 1.5 cm and mainly composed of Ground Glass Opacity (GGO).

Roles and outcomes of thoracoscopic anatomic lung subsegmentectomy for lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We performed sublobar resections, including thoracoscopic segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy for small lung cancers, and analysed the results of indications and outcomes of thoracoscopic subsegmentectomy.

METHODS

Between March 2005 and May 2020, 357 consecutive patients underwent thoracoscopic anatomic sublobar resections for lung cancer, including 68 patients undergoing subsegmentectomy. These patients were compared with 289 patients who underwent segmentectomy during the same period.

RESULTS

Subsegmentectomies included mono-/bi-/tri-subsegmentectomies for 34/23/11 of 68 patients, respectively. The median tumour size was 13.5 mm, significantly smaller than tumours in patients who underwent a segmentectomy (P < 0.001). Tumours obtained by mono-subsegmentectomy (11.0 mm) were significantly smaller than bi-/tri-subsegmentectomy (P = 0.028). The proportion of ground-glass opacity-dominant tumours obtained by subsegmentectomy (85.3%) was higher than that obtained by segmentectomy. The proportion of intentional cases satisfying the criteria for sublobar resection was higher than that of segmentectomy cases. Although tumour locations in 40 patients were not identified during surgery, tumours were correctly resected in 39 patients without tumour markers. The median operative time and blood loss were 167 min and 13 ml, significantly shorter and less, respectively, in subsegmentectomy than in segmentectomy patients (P = 0.005, P = 0.006). Duration of drainage and hospitalization were 1 and 5 days, respectively, for subsegmentectomy patients; complications occurred in 6 (8.8%). Outcomes were similar to those of the segmentectomy patients. Although 4 subsegmentectomy patients died of other diseases, none showed cancer recurrence during a mean follow-up of 50 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracoscopic subsegmentectomy can be used for patients with ground-glass opacity-dominant lung cancers <1.5 cm if adequate margins can be secured.

Why comprehensive adoption of robotic assisted thoracic surgery is ideal for both simple and complex lung resections

Minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgical techniques have grown increasingly popular due to improved outcome measures compared to conventional rib-spreading thoracotomy. However, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) presents with unique technical challenges that have limited its role in certain cases. Here, we discuss our perspectives on the implementation of a successful robotic thoracic program. We will then present the case for how the adoption of robotic assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) provides the benefits of minimally invasive VATS while still retaining the technical finesse of bimanual articulating instruments and 3-dimensional imaging that is a universal component of any open surgery. We will also discuss how to overcome some of the perceived disadvantages to RATS in regard to the higher cost, lack of tactile feedback and potential safety concerns.