National Practice Patterns and Early Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement in Children and Teens

Lifetime Management of Adolescents and Young Adults with Congenital Aortic Valve Disease

In this invited expert review, we focus on evolving lifetime management strategies for adolescents and young adults with congenital aortic valve disease, acknowledging that these patients often require multiple interventions during their lifetime. Our goal is to preserve the native aortic valve when feasible. Leveraging advanced multimodality imaging, a detailed assessment of the aortic valve and root complex can be obtained, and a surgically approach tailored to an individual patient's anatomy and pathology can be used. In turn, aortic valve repair and reconstruction can be offered to a greater number of patients, either as a definitive strategy or as a component of a staged strategy to delay the need for aortic valve replacement until later in life when more options are available.

Paediatric aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and microsimulation study

AIMS

To support decision-making in children undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR), by providing a comprehensive overview of published outcomes after paediatric AVR, and microsimulation-based age-specific estimates of outcome with different valve substitutes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review of published literature reporting clinical outcome after paediatric AVR (mean age <18 years) published between 1/1/1990 and 11/08/2021 was conducted. Publications reporting outcome after paediatric Ross procedure, mechanical AVR (mAVR), homograft AVR (hAVR), and/or bioprosthetic AVR were considered for inclusion. Early risks (<30d), late event rates (>30d) and time-to-event data were pooled and entered into a microsimulation model. Sixty-eight studies, of which one prospective and 67 retrospective cohort studies, were included, encompassing a total of 5259 patients (37 435 patient-years; median follow-up: 5.9 years; range 1-21 years). Pooled mean age for the Ross procedure, mAVR, and hAVR was 9.2 ± 5.6, 13.0 ± 3.4, and 8.4 ± 5.4 years, respectively. Pooled early mortality for the Ross procedure, mAVR, and hAVR was 3.7% (95% CI, 3.0%-4.7%), 7.0% (5.1%-9.6%), and 10.6% (6.6%-17.0%), respectively, and late mortality rate was 0.5%/year (0.4%-0.7%/year), 1.0%/year (0.6%-1.5%/year), and 1.4%/year (0.8%-2.5%/year), respectively. Microsimulation-based mean life-expectancy in the first 20 years was 18.9 years (18.6-19.1 years) after Ross (relative life-expectancy: 94.8%) and 17.0 years (16.5-17.6 years) after mAVR (relative life-expectancy: 86.3%). Microsimulation-based 20-year risk of aortic valve reintervention was 42.0% (95% CI: 39.6%-44.6%) after Ross and 17.8% (95% CI: 17.0%-19.4%) after mAVR.

CONCLUSION

Results of paediatric AVR are currently suboptimal with substantial mortality especially in the very young with considerable reintervention hazards for all valve substitutes, but the Ross procedure provides a survival benefit over mAVR. Pros and cons of substitutes should be carefully weighed during paediatric valve selection.

Ross Procedure in Children: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Single-center studies have demonstrated excellent results for the Ross procedure in children. We aimed to evaluate national variation in clinical outcomes using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database.

METHODS

The database was used to identify 2805 children undergoing the Ross procedure from 2000 through 2018, comprising 163 neonates (<30 days, 5.8%), 448 infants (30-365 days, 16.0%), 1444 children (1-12 years, 51.5%), and 750 teenagers (13-17 years, 26.7%). Centers were divided into terciles by procedural volume. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of a composite outcome of operative mortality, neurologic deficit, or renal failure requiring dialysis.

RESULTS

Neonates and infants were more likely to present with aortic stenosis than children and teenagers (61.7% [n = 377] vs 34.6% [n = 760]; P < .01) and have risk factors including preoperative shock (9.2% [n = 56] vs 0.4% [n = 8]; P < .01). Operative mortality was 24.1% (n = 39) in neonates, 11.2% (n = 50) in infants, 1.5% (n = 21) in children , and 0.8% (n = 6) in teenagers (P < .01). Independent predictors of the composite outcome in children aged <1 year included neonatal age (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; 95% CI, 1.9-4.8), low-volume center (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-3.9), and procedure year (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9 per 5 years). In children aged ≥1 year, no association was found between center volume, procedure year, and outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ross procedure is being performed with low mortality in children aged ≥1 year throughout North America. High-volume centers have improved outcomes in children aged <1 year, who have different anatomic characteristics and risk profiles.

Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Implantation in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is common in adults but rare in children and adolescents. Since 2014, our institution has incorporated a transcatheter approach as an option for aortic valve replacement in this population. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term outcomes of TAVI with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This single-center, retrospective study included patients aged 10 to 21 years who had a native SAVR or TAVI between January 2010 to April 2020. Comparative analysis of baseline characteristics and a composite outcome (stroke within 6 months, readmission within 30 days, death) between SAVR and TAVI were made using chi-square test or Wilcoxon rank sum test, as appropriate. Of the 77 patients who underwent native aortic valve implantation during the study period (60 SAVR, 17 TAVI), 46 were aged 10 to 21 years (30 SAVR, 16 TAVI). Median follow-up was 3.8 years (interquartile range 1.5 to 4.9) for the SAVR group and 1.5 years (interquartile range 1.1 to 1.2) for the TAVI group. There was no difference in the composite outcome between groups. Patients in the SAVR group were more likely to have undergone concomitant surgical intervention and have longer intensive care unit and hospital stays. In conclusion, our study suggests similar short-term outcomes between SAVR and TAVI in children and young adults aged 10 to 21 years. Longer-term studies are essential to understand the utility of TAVI and to better consider the option of a transcatheter approach as an alternative to SAVR in the pediatric population.

Paediatric aortic valve replacement using decellularized allografts

OBJECTIVES

Options for paediatric aortic valve replacement (AVR) are limited if valve repair is not feasible. Results of paediatric Ross procedures are inferior to adult Ross results, and mechanical AVR imposes constant anticoagulation with the inherent risks.

METHODS

The study design was a prospective, multicentre follow-up of all paediatric patients receiving decellularized aortic homografts (DAHs) for AVR in 8 European centres.

RESULTS

A total of 106 children (77 boys) were operated (mean age 10.1 ± 4.8 years, DAH diameter 20.5 ± 3.8 mm). A total of 60 (57%) had undergone previous surgical interventions: 34 with 1, 15 with 2 and 11 with ≥3. There was one early death in a 12-year-old girl, who underwent her fourth aortic valve operation, due to intracerebral haemorrhage on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after coronary reimplantation problems following 3-sinus reconstruction 1 year earlier. One 2-year-old patient died due to sepsis 2 months postoperatively with no evidence for endocarditis. In addition, a single pacemaker implantation was necessary and a 2.5-year-old girl underwent successful HTx due to chronic myocardial failure despite an intact DAH. After a mean follow-up of 3.30 ± 2.45 years, primary efficacy end points mean peak gradient (18.1 ± 20.9 mmHg) and regurgitation (mean 0.61 ± 0.63, grade 0-3) were very good. Freedom from death/explantation/endocarditis/bleeding/stroke at 5 years was 97.8 ± 1.6/85.0 ± 7.4/100/100/100% respectively. Calculated expected adverse events were lower for DAH compared to cryopreserved homograft patients (mean age 8.9 years), lower than in Ross patients (9.4 years) and in the same range as mechanical AVR (12.8 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Even though the overall number of paediatric DAH patients and the follow-up time span are still limited, our data suggest that DAHs may present a promising additional option for paediatric AVR.

Impact of Valve Type (Ross vs. Mechanical) on Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Young Adults with Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

The impact of aortic valve replacement (AVR) type on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in adolescents and young adults is unclear, but may vary depending on need for anticoagulation or re-intervention. We sought to determine the differences in HRQOL following AVR with either the Ross procedure or mechanical AVR in this young population.

METHODS

Patients 14-35 years old and at least 1 year post-AVR were included. HRQOL was assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36). Valve-specific concerns regarding anticoagulation and reoperation were also assessed. Clinical outcome data were obtained by chart review.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients were enrolled: 24 (47%) Ross and 27 (53%) mechanical AVR. Ross patients were younger at time of AVR (16 vs. 22 years, p < 0.01) and study enrollment (23.7 vs 29.5 years, p < 0.01). Median follow-up from AVR to study enrollment was similar (5.4 years for Ross vs. 5.6 years for mechanical, p = 0.62). At last follow-up, clinical outcomes including cardiac function, functional class, and aortic valve re-intervention rates were similar between groups, although mechanical valve patients had more bleeding events (p = 0.012). SF-36 scores were generally high for the entire cohort, with no significant difference between groups in any domain. Mechanical AVR patients reported more concern about frequency of blood draws (p < 0.01). Concern for reoperation was similar between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite more bleeding events and concern about the frequency of blood draws, adolescents and young adults with mechanical AVR reported similarly high levels of HRQOL compared to those following Ross AVR.

Aortic Valve Replacement in Young and Middle-Aged Adults: Current and Potential Roles of TAVR

BACKGROUND

Contemporary practice patterns and outcomes for aortic valve replacement (AVR) among young and middle-aged adults are unknown given guideline modifications for surgical AVR (SAVR) and increasing transcatheter AVR (TAVR) acceptance. This study describes SAVR and TAVR use and outcomes using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) National Databases.

METHODS

Adults 18 to 55 years of age in the Congenital Heart Surgery Database (CHSD) and the Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD) who underwent SAVR or TAVR from 2013 to 2018 were included. Perioperative characteristics and early outcomes were described by valve type. Multivariable regression identified determinants of death, length of hospital stay, and a composite end point of renal failure, persistent neurologic deficit, readmission, and reoperation.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 1580 unique CHSD and 44,173 ACSD operations, 16% of which were performed in patients with congenital heart disease. Valve use included the following: TAVR, 1%; mechanical, 42%; bioprosthetic, 55%; autograft, 0.6%; homograft, 1.2%; and Ozaki, 0.4%. Over time, TAVR volumes increased by 167%. The 30-day mortality was as follows: TAVR, 3.8%; mechanical, 3.2%; bioprosthetic, 3.7%; autograft, 0.6%; homograft, 9%; and Ozaki, 3.4%. Stroke rate was lower for isolated SAVR vs isolated TAVR (0.9% vs 2.4%; P = .002). In multivariable analyses, mortality risk was lower with mechanical valves, congenital morbidity risk was higher with TAVR, and length of stay was shorter with TAVR.

CONCLUSIONS

TAVR is increasingly used for adults younger than 55 years of age. Given the uniformly excellent results with SAVR, including both mortality and morbidity-particularly regarding stroke, our data favor SAVR in this population, but a prospective trial is needed. Ongoing efforts to harmonize variables and outcomes definitions between the ACSD and CHSD are valuable.

The Role of Novel Transcatheter Procedures in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease

The development of percutaneous structural interventions in patients with acquired heart disease is happening at an exponential rate, and some of this technology is being used to treat patients with congenital heart disease. This review describes the pathophysiology of valvular abnormalities specific to congenital heart disease and discusses the application of structural procedures in this population. Although the overall experience has been encouraging, especially in high-risk patients, this article will highlight the reasons that a cautious approach to adoption of this technology is necessary in these patients.