How Do Type of Preoperative P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitor and Withdrawal Time Affect Bleeding?

Platelet P2Y12 Receptor Inhibition and Perioperative Patient Management

P2Y12 receptor inhibitor use increases bleeding risk in surgical patients by inhibiting platelet aggregation. Preoperative monitoring, platelet transfusion, and targeted reversal strategies with novel therapies may help to optimize patient management.

Platelet inhibitor withdrawal and outcomes after coronary artery surgery: an individual patient data meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between guideline-conforming as compared to shorter than recommended withdrawal period of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors prior to isolated on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and the incidence of severe bleeding and ischaemic events. Randomized controlled trials are lacking in this field.

METHODS

We searched PUBMED, Embase and other suitable databases for studies including patients on P2Y12 receptor inhibitors undergoing isolated CABG and reporting bleeding and postoperative ischaemic events from 2013 to March 2024. The primary outcome was incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 4 (BARC-4) bleeding defined as any of the following: perioperative intracranial bleeding, reoperation for bleeding, transfusion of ≥5 units of red blood cells, chest tube output of ≥2 l. The secondary outcome was postoperative ischaemic events according to the Academic Research Consortium 2 Consensus Document. Patient-level data provided by each observational trial were synthesized into a single dataset and analysed using a 2-stage IPD-MA.

RESULTS

Individual data of 4837 patients from 7 observational studies were synthesized. BARC-4 bleeding, 30-day mortality and postoperative ischaemic events occurred in 20%, 2.6% and 5.2% of patients. After adjusting for EuroSCORE II and cardiopulmonary bypass time, guideline-conforming withdrawal was associated with decreased BARC-4 bleeding risk in patients on clopidogrel [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.48; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.28-0.81; P = 0.006] and a trend towards decreased risk in patients on ticagrelor (adjusted OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.22-1.05; P = 0.067). Guideline-conforming withdrawal was not significantly associated with 30-day mortality risk (clopidogrel: adjusted OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.30-1.61; ticagrelor: adjusted OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.37-2.18) but with decreased risk of postoperative ischaemic events in patients on clopidogrel (clopidogrel: adjusted OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.82; ticagrelor: adjusted OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.45-1.37). BARC-4 bleeding was associated with 30-day mortality risk (adjusted OR 4.76; 95% CI 2.67-8.47; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Guideline-conforming preoperative withdrawal of ticagrelor and clopidogrel was associated with a 50% reduced BARC-4 bleeding risk when corrected for EuroSCORE II and cardiopulmonary bypass time but was not associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality or postoperative ischaemic events.

Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Models for P2Y12 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Clinical Appraisal Using Exposure Simulation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Recent research indicates a correlation between plasma concentration of P2Y12 inhibitors and clinical events, particularly bleeding, which significantly impeded their clinical therapeutic performance. It is therefore vital to delve into the factors that might affect the plasma concentration. The study aims to summarize population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PopPKPD) models for commonly prescribed P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor) and assess bleeding risk in specific individual groups.

METHODS

The PopPKPD models of P2Y12 inhibitors were collected and summarized based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The collected models were replicated in simulations, which were used to assess factors affecting plasma concentrations of P2Y12 inhibitors. Simulation results for special populations were compared to therapeutic window based on reported exposure-effect relationships (PK/PD-related bleeding and thrombotic clinical outcomes) to predict bleeding risk in special populations with different dosing regimens and cumulative covariates.

RESULT

Finally, 12 studies were included for PK simulation, 7 of which that also included PD data were subjected to further analysis, with the majority being based on Phase I or II trials. Simulations showed that several covariates such as female gender, weight, elderly can significantly impact on exposure, with special populations reaching up to 179% of the general population. However, after dose adjustment, blood concentrations for special populations can reach approximately ±20% of general population exposure. Therefore, lowering the maintenance dose of ticagrelor from 90 to 60 mg bid was first recommended to reduce bleeding risk without significantly increasing ischemic risk, particularly in elderly, small-weight Asian females.

CONCLUSION

Lowering the maintenance dose of ticagrelor from 90 to 60 mg bid effectively reduces bleeding risk without increasing thrombotic infarction risk in elderly, small-weight Asian females.

Preoperative treatment with clopidogrel and ticagrelor on bleeding complications in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel or ticagrelor increased bleeding complications in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We aimed to compare the bleeding risks between patients treated with clopidogrel and ticagrelor preoperatively and investigate the influence of discontinuation of clopidogrel and ticagrelor on bleeding risk in off-pump CABG (OPCABG).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with DAPT who underwent OPCABG. The propensity score matching was performed given the baseline differences between clopidogrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients. Bleeding was assessed by chest tube drainage volume and universal definition of perioperative bleeding.

RESULTS

This study included 836 patients. Five hundred and fifty patients were treated with clopidogrel and 286 patients treated with ticagrelor before surgery. After matching, 275 patients treated with clopidogrel and 275 patients with ticagrelor were included. There were no significant differences in bleeding between clopidogrel and ticagrelor group. Patients who discontinued clopidogrel before surgery <3 d had a higher risk of severe perioperative bleeding compared with those who discontinued ≥5 d (16.4 % vs. 5.0 %, P = 0.045). By contrast, the risk of severe perioperative bleeding was comparable among patients who discontinued ticagrelor for <3 d, ≥3-5 d and ≥5 d preoperatively (16.2 % vs. 9.1 % vs. 10.1 %, P = 0.317). The multivariable analysis confirmed that time since discontinuation (<3 d vs. ≥5 d: OR = 2.732, 95 % CI: 1.332-5.605, P = 0.006) but not the types of P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist was an independent predictor for severe perioperative bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in severe perioperative bleeding between clopidogrel and ticagrelor groups. Discontinuation of clopidogrel <3 d before OPCABG increased the risk of severe perioperative bleeding.

How do type of preoperative P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and withdrawal time affect bleeding? Protocol of a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

In order to reduce the risk of bleeding in patients on P2Y12 receptor inhibitors presenting for non-emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), current guidelines recommend a preoperative discontinuation period of at least three, five and seven days for ticagrelor, clopidogrel and prasugrel, respectively, to allow for recovery of platelet function. However, there is still substantial interinstitutional variation in preoperative management and relevant covariates of CABG-related bleeding are largely elusive so far.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search PubMed (July 2013 to November 2021) and EMBASE (January 2014 to November 2021) using the following terms, MeSH terms and their synonyms: clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, dual antiplatelet, P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, CABG, bleeding, haemorrhage. Two independent reviewers will screen all abstracts and full papers for eligibility. Disagreements will be solved by consulting with a third reviewer.The primary outcome is the incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type-4 bleeding depending on type of P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and preoperative withdrawal period. The secondary outcomes are mortality and ischaemic events according to the Academic Research Consortium 2 Consensus Document. We will perform an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) with drug-specific preoperative withdrawal time and adjust for demographic and procedural variables. Subgroup analyses will be performed for anaemic patients and patients undergoing non-emergent versus urgent/emergent surgery.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This IPD-MA consists of secondary analyses of existing non-identifiable data and meets the criteria for waiver of ethics review by the local Research Ethics Committee. Data sharing and transfer will be subject to a confidentiality agreement and a data use agreement. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentation.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022291946.

Thromboelastography-Platelet Mapping Allows Safe and Earlier Urgent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

Current STS guidelines recommend delaying CABG for several days or performing platelet function testing in stable patients who received P2Y12 inhibitors. Our program routinely uses thromboelastography-platelet mapping (TEG-PM) to expedite CABG in P2Y12 non-responders (NR). We hypothesize that P2Y12 NR had no difference in LOS to surgery and blood product transfusion compared to patients undergoing urgent inpatient CABG not treated with a P2Y12 inhibitor.

METHODS

A total of 221 patients from 2015-2019 were P2Y12 NR based on TEG-PM result of < 50% ADP inhibition. The control group was 232 consecutive patients who also had urgent inpatient CABG but were not treated pre-operatively with a P2Y12 inhibitor. Exclusion criteria were identical between groups.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven percent of inpatient CABG patients who were treated pre-operatively with a P2Y12 inhibitor were NR. The mean number of days from cardiac surgical consultation to CABG in the TEG-PM NR group was 1.6 ± 0.1 versus 2.1 ± 0.1 in the control group (p<0.01). The mean total number of blood product units transfused was 1.6 ± 0.2 in the TEG-PM NR group versus 1.6 ± 0.4 in controls (p=0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate a very high incidence of P2Y12 non-responders in patients undergoing urgent CABG at our program. These patients underwent surgery at least 3 days earlier than STS recommendations and common practice with no difference in transfusion requirement. Routine use of TEG-PM to identify P2Y12 NR can safely decrease pre-operative hospital LOS and associated cost and improve resource utilization and patient satisfaction.

European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis and International Alliance of Urolithiasis Joint Consensus on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

CONTEXT

Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been performed for decades and has gone through many refinements, there are still concerns regarding its more widespread utilization because of the long learning curve and the potential risk of severe complications. Many technical details are not included in the guidelines because of their nature and research protocol.

OBJECTIVE

To achieve an expert consensus viewpoint on PCNL indications, preoperative patient preparation, surgical strategy, management and prevention of severe complications, postoperative management, and follow-up.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

An international panel of experts from the Urolithiasis Section of the European Association of Urology, International Alliance of Urolithiasis, and other urology associations was enrolled, and a prospectively conducted study, incorporating literature review, discussion on research gaps (RGs), and questionnaires and following data analysis, was performed to reach a consensus on PCNL.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The expert panel consisted of 36 specialists in PCNL from 20 countries all around the world. A consensus on PCNL was developed. The expert panel was not as large as expected, and the discussion on RGs did not bring in more supportive evidence in the present consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate preoperative preparation, especially elimination of urinary tract infection prior to PCNL, accurate puncture with guidance of fluoroscopy and/or ultrasonography or a combination, keeping a low intrarenal pressure, and shortening of operation time during PCNL are important technical requirements to ensure safety and efficiency in PCNL.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been a well-established procedure for the management of upper urinary tract stones. However, according to an expert panel consensus, core technical aspects, as well as the urologist's experience, are critical to the safety and effectiveness of PCNL.