Acute Type A Aortic Dissection With Cardiopulmonary Arrest at Presentation

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation at operating room entry in acute aortic dissection type A patients: is surgery contraindicated?

Background

This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of surgical treatment for acute type A aortic dissection between patients undergoing cardiopulmonary arrest at the time of entry into the operating room and patients who received successful preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation before entering the operating room or patients who had cardiopulmonary arrest on the operating room table after entering the operating room without cardiopulmonary arrest. In the present study, we focused on the circulatory status at the time of entering the operating room because it is economically and emotionally difficult to cease intervention once the patient has entered the operating room, where surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and perfusionists are already present, all necessary materials are packed off and cardiopulmonary bypass have already been primed.

Methods

Twenty (5.5%) of 362 patients who underwent surgical treatment for acute type A aortic dissection between January 2016 and March 2022 had preoperative cardiopulmonary arrest. To compare the early operative outcomes, the patients were divided into the spontaneous circulation group (n = 14, 70.0%) and the non-spontaneous circulation group (n = 6, 30.0%) based on the presence or absence of spontaneous circulation upon entering the operating room. The primary endpoint was postoperative 30-day mortality. The secondary endpoints included in-hospital complications and persistent neurological disorders.

Results

Thirty-day mortality was 65% (n = 13/20) in the entire cohort; 50% (n = 7/14) in the spontaneous circulation group and 100% (n = 6/6) in the non-spontaneous circulation group. The major cardiopulmonary arrest causes were aortic rupture and cardiac tamponade (n = 16; 80.0%), followed by coronary malperfusion (n = 4; 20.0%). Seven patients (50.0%) survived in the spontaneous circulation group, and none survived in the non-spontaneous circulation group (P = .044). Five survivors walked unaided and were discharged home; the remaining two were comatose and paraplegic.

Conclusions

The outcomes were extremely poor in patients with acute type A aortic dissection who had preoperative cardiopulmonary arrest and received ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation at entry into the operating room. Therefore, surgical treatment might be contraindicated in such patients.

Prognostic impact of shock in patients with type A acute aortic syndrome. Results of a nationwide multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical characteristics, imaging findings, treatment, and prognosis of patients with type A acute aortic syndrome (AAS-A) presenting with shock. To assess the impact of surgery on this patient population.

METHODS

The study included 521 patients with A-AAS enrolled in the Spanish Registry of Acute Aortic Syndrome (RESA-III) from January 2018 to December 2019. The RESA-III is a prospective, multicenter registry that contains AAS data from 30 tertiary-care hospitals. Patients were classified into two groups according to their clinical presentation, with or without shock. Shock was defined as persistent systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg despite adequate volume resuscitation.

RESULTS

97 (18.6%) patients with A-AAS presented with shock. Clinical presentation with syncope was much more common in the Shock group (45.4% vs 10.1%, p = 0.001). Patients in the Shock group had more complications at diagnosis and before surgery: cardiac tamponade (36.2% vs 9%, p < 0.001), acute renal failure (28.9% vs 18.2%, p = 0.018), and need for orotracheal intubation (40% vs 9.1%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in aortic regurgitation (51.6% vs 46.7%, p = 0.396) between groups. In-hospital mortality was higher among patients with shock (48.5% vs 27.4%, p < 0.001). Surgery was associated with a significant mortality reduction both in patients with and without shock. Surgery had an independent protective effect on mortality (OR 0.03, 95% CI (0.00-0.32)).

CONCLUSION

Patients with AAS-A admitted with shock have a heavily increased risk of mortality. Syncope and pericardial effusion at diagnosis are strongly associated with shock. Surgery was independently associated with a mortality reduction in patients with AAS-A and shock.

Safety and efficacy of ketorolac in improving the prognosis of acute type A aortic dissection patients: a protocol of a randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Acute type A aortic dissection (aTAAD) is a critical and life-threatening condition. Previous research has demonstrated that the use of ketorolac not only reduces the progression, incidence, and severity of aortic aneurysms in animal models, but also decreases postoperative mortality and complications in patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm replacement. However, there is a lack of studies investigating the efficacy of ketorolac in treating aTAAD in humans. Therefore, we conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ketorolac in patients with aTAAD. Our hypothesis was that ketorolac treatment for aTAAD patients would meet safety indicators and effectively improve patient prognosis.

METHODS/DESIGN

This study is a single-center, randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled study. A total of 120 patients with aTAAD will be recruited and will be randomized into the ketorolac group and placebo group with a ratio of 1:1. Ketorolac tromethamine 60 mg per 2 ml will be intramuscularly injected within 2 h before surgery, followed by intramuscular injections of 30 mg per 1 ml BID. on the first and second postoperative days in the Ketorolac group, while 0.9% saline will be administered at the same dose, dosage form, and time in the placebo group. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ketorolac in improving the prognosis of aTAAD. The primary endpoint is the composite endpoint event concerning drug-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints include drug-related adverse events, laboratory examination of blood, diagnostic imaging tests, clinical biomarkers, etc. DISCUSSION: This study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical College (approval number: 2023-197-02). This study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ketorolac in patients with aTAAD. All participating patients will sign an informed consent form, and the trial results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn ) ChiCTR2300074394. Registered on 4 October 2023.

Should we operate on patients with acute type A aortic dissection who present with cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

OBJECTIVES

Acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) is a life-threatening medical emergency. Emergent surgical repair is the gold standard but mortality remains high. Mortality is even higher in patients who arrive at the hospital in poor condition, especially after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This study was designed to analyse the outcome of patients who underwent surgery for AADA and who require preoperative CPR.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2023, 810 patients underwent emergent surgery for AADA at our centre. Of these, 63 had preoperative CPR. We performed a retrospective analysis with follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean age was 64 ± 13 years and 37 (59%) patients were male. Further, 50 (79%) patients had preoperative intubation, and 54 (86%) had pericardial effusion. Twenty-four (38%) patients had out-of-hospital CPR, 19 (30%) required CPR in hospital and 20 (32%) needed CPR in the operating room. Successful CPR with return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 41 (65%) patients, and 22 (35%) underwent emergent surgery under ongoing CPR. The median time of CPR was 10 (interquartile range 12) min, and the median time from onset of symptoms to start of the operation was 5.5 (interquartile range 4.8) h. The majority of patients underwent ascending aortic replacement with hemiarch repair (n = 37, 59%). Further, 26 (41%) patients underwent full root replacement. Another 15 (24%) patients underwent total arch repair with or without (frozen) elephant trunk repair. Postoperative stroke was present in 8 (13%) patients. The 30-day mortality was 29 (46%). The 30-day mortality of patients with preoperative intubation was not significantly higher (n = 15/28, 54%, P = 0.446). The 1-, 5- and 10-year survival rates of the entire group were 42, 39 and 36%.

CONCLUSIONS

Early mortality for patients undergoing surgery for AADA with preoperative CPR is extremely high (almost 50%). However, this means that also ∼50% of patients benefit from surgery despite poor preoperative prognosis. Patients with preoperative intubation after CPR and unknown neurological condition should also undergo surgery. Patients who survive the initial operation for AADA have acceptable long-term survival. Emergent surgery should be offered for all patients with AADA regardless of the preoperative condition, even after CPR.

Analysis of factors affecting outcome in acute type A aortic dissection complicated by preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation

OBJECTIVES

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) aggravates the pre-existing dismal prognosis of patients suffering from acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). We aimed to identify factors affecting survival and outcome in ATAAD patients requiring CPR at presentation at 2 European aortic centres.

METHODS

Data on 112 surgical candidates and undergoing preoperative CPR were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to 30-day mortality. A multivariable model identified predictors for 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Preoperative death occurred in 23 patients (20.5%). In the remaining 89 surgical patients (79.5%) circulatory arrest time (41 ± 20 min in 30-day non-survivors vs 30 ± 13 min in 30-day survivor, P = 0.003) as well as cardiopulmonary bypass time (320 ± 132 min in 30-day non-survivors vs 252 ± 140 min in 30-day survivor, P = 0.020) time was significantly longer in patients with worse outcome. Thirty-day mortality of the total cohort was 61.6% (n = 69) with cardiac failure in 48% and aortic rupture or haemorrhagic shock (28%) as predominant reasons of death. Age [odds ratio (OR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.09, P = 0.034], preoperative coronary (OR 3.42, 95% CI 1.34-9.26, p = 0.012) and spinal malperfusion (OR 12.49, 95% CI 1.83-225.02, P = 0.028) emerged as independent predictors for 30-day mortality while CPR due to tamponade was associated with improved early survival (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.091-0.81, P = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of underlying cause for CPR is mandatory. Pericardial tamponade, rapidly resolved with pericardial drainage, is a predictor for improved survival, while age and presence of coronary and spinal malperfusion are associated with dismal outcome in this high-risk patient group.

Perioperative Mass Transfusion Affects In-Hospital but Not Follow-Up Survival in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of mass transfusion on the postoperative outcome and survival in patients presenting with acute Type A aortic dissection. Materials and Methods: Between 2002 and 2020, a total of 505 patients were surgically treated for an acute Type A aortic dissection. Mass transfusion was defined as the peri- and postoperative replacement by transfusion of 10 units. Patient characteristics and outcomes were analyzed and compared between patients with and without mass transfusion. Results: Mass transfusion occurred in 105 patients (20%). The incidences of symptomatic coronary malperfusion (p = 0.017) and tamponade (p = 0.043) were higher in patients with mass transfusion. There was no statistically significant difference in the distal extension of the aortic dissection between the two groups. A valved conduit was significantly more common in patients with mass transfusion (p = 0.007), while the distal aortic repair was similar between the two groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass time (p < 0.001), cross clamp time (p < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality were significantly higher in patients with mass transfusion (p < 0.001), but the survival after discharge (landmark-analysis) showed equal survival between patients with and without mass transfusion (log rank: p = 0.4). Mass transfusion was predictive of in-hospital mortality (OR: 3.308, p < 0.001) but not for survival after discharge (OR: 1.205, p = 0.661). Conclusions: Mass transfusion is necessary in many patients with acute Type A aortic dissection. These patients present sicker and require longer surgery. However, mass transfusion does not influence survival after discharge.

Outcomes of type A acute aortic dissection with cardiopulmonary arrest: Tokyo Acute Aortic Super-network Registry

OBJECTIVES

Preventing loss of life in patients with type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) who present with cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) can be extremely difficult. Thus, we investigated the early outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

Patients with type A AAD who were transported to hospitals belonging to the Tokyo Acute Aortic Super-network between January 2015 and December 2019 were considered for this study. We assessed the early mortality of these patients presenting with CPA and also investigated the differences in outcomes between patients with out-of-hospital and in-hospital CPA.

RESULTS

A total of 3307 patients with type A AAD were transported, 434 (13.1%) of whom presented with CPA. The overall mortality of patients presenting with CPA was 88.2% (383/434), of which 94.5% (240/254) experienced out-of-hospital CPA and 79.4% (143/180) experienced in-hospital CPA (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that aortic surgery [odds ratio (OR), 0.022; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.008-0.060; P < 0.001] and patient age over 80 years (OR, 2.946; 95% CI, 1.012-8.572; P = 0.047) were related with mortality in patients with type A AAD and CPA. Between in-hospital and out-of-hospital CPA, the proportions of DeBakey type 1 (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.065-5.054; P = 0.034), cerebral malperfusion (OR, 0.188; 95% CI, 0.056-0.629; P = 0.007), aortic surgery (OR, 0.111; 95% CI, 0.045-0.271; P = 0.001), age (OR, 0.969; 95% CI, 0.940-0.998; P = 0.039) and the time from symptom onset to hospital admission (OR, 1.122; 95% CI, 1.025-1.228; P = 0.012) were significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with type A AAD presenting with CPA exhibited extremely high rates of death. Patient outcomes following in-hospital CPA tended to be better than those following out-of-hospital CPA; however, this difference was not significantly different. To prevent deaths, aortic surgery, when possible, should be considered in patients with type A AAD who sustained CPA.

Decision making and management of acute type-A dissection presenting with shock or cardiac arrest

While the outcome of aortic repair for acute type-A aortic dissection has improved, overall mortality among patients who developed acute type-A aortic dissection remains extremely high. Hypotension in acute type-A aortic dissection patients is a critical condition that is associated with increased in-hospital mortality and neurologic events. The underlying causes of shock include acute aortic regurgitation, cardiac tamponade, and myocardial infarction. The most reasonable initial approach is to administer intravenous fluids to improve blood pressure, increase preload and cardiac output, and ensure adequate end-organ perfusion. Cardiac tamponade-induced hypotension associated with aortic rupture has been identified as a major risk factor for perioperative mortality in patients with acute type-A aortic dissection. In addition, the most serious complications of acute type-A aortic dissection include preoperative cardiopulmonary arrest, especially out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Recent advances in rapid transportation and diagnosis, and the introduction of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, have resulted in an increase in the number of patients with cardiopulmonary arrest related to acute type-A aortic dissection. However, controversy continues to surround treatment strategies, surgical indications, and the timing of surgery on such patients. This review, therefore, discusses decision-making and the managerial issues surrounding acute type-A dissection presenting with shock, cardiac tamponade, and cardiac arrest.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - who, when, and where?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is an invasive and resource-intensive therapy used to care for patients with refractory cardiac arrest. In this review, we highlight considerations for the establishment of an ECPR system of care for patients suffering refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

RECENT FINDINGS

ECPR has been shown to improve neurologically favorable outcomes in patients with refractory cardiac arrest in numerous studies, including a single randomized control trial. Successful ECPR programs are typically part of a comprehensive system of care that optimizes all phases of OHCA management. Given the resource-intensive and time-sensitive nature of ECPR, patient selection criteria, timing of ECPR, and location must be well defined. Many knowledge gaps remain within ECPR systems of care, postcardiac arrest management, and neuroprognostication strategies for ECPR patients.

SUMMARY

To be consistently successful, ECPR must be a part of a comprehensive OHCA system of care that optimizes all phases of cardiac arrest management. Future investigation is needed for the knowledge gaps that remain.

An increased prothrombin time-international normalized ratio in patients with acute type A aortic dissection: contributing factors and their influence on outcomes

PURPOSE

We investigated factors contributing to coagulopathy in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and coagulopathy's influence on patient outcomes.

METHODS

We grouped 420 patients who underwent ATAAD repair-none under anticoagulation therapy or with liver disease-by the prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) at admission:  <  1.2 (no coagulopathy, n  =  371), 1.2-1.49 (mild coagulopathy, n  =  33), or  ≥  1.5 (severe coagulopathy, n  =  16). We then compared the clinical presentation, dissection morphology, and outcomes among the groups. We assessed the PT-INR in relation to the preoperative hemodynamics and searched for factors predictive of a PT-INR  ≥  1.2.

RESULTS

The transfusion volume and operation time were increased among patients with coagulopathy (P  <  0.05). The in-hospital mortality (15.2-37.5% vs. 5.1%, P  < 0.001) and 5-year survival (61.1-74.4% vs. 87.6%) were relatively poor for these patients. The median PT-INR was 1.03 (0.97-1.1) for patients with stable hemodynamics (n  =  318), 1.11 (1.02-1.21) for those in shock (blood pressure  <  80 mmHg) not given cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (n  =  81), and 1.1 (1.0-1.54) for those in shock given CPR (n  =  21) (P  < 0.001). A multivariable analysis identified shock (P  <  0.001), a partially thrombosed false lumen (P  =  0.006), and mesenteric malperfusion (P  =  0.016) as predictive variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Shock, a partially thrombosed false lumen, and mesenteric malperfusion appear to be predictive of dissection-related coagulopathy, which influences outcomes negatively.