B-cell directed therapies in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome — New directions based on murine and human data

An update on the biologics for the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity with the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). Although anticoagulation is the primary treatment for APS, it fails in approximately 20-30% of obstetric APS cases and more than 30% of thrombotic APS cases. Therefore, there is a need for new, targeted treatments beyond anticoagulants. Biologics, such as rituximab and eculizumab, have been recommended for refractory catastrophic APS. This review focuses on the recent advancements in the pathogenesis of APS and explores the potential of targeted treatments, including eculizumab, rituximab, belimumab, daratumumab, obinutuzumab, and anti-TNF-α antibodies, for APS management.

Targeted Therapy for SLE-What Works, What Doesn't, What's Next

For many years, the failure of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has prevented patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from benefiting from biological drugs that have proved to be effective in other rheumatological diseases. Only two biologics are approved for SLE, however they can only be administered to a restricted proportion of patients. Recently, several phase II RCTs have evaluated the efficacy and safety of new biologics in extra-renal SLE and lupus nephritis. Six drug trials have reported encouraging results, with an improvement in multiple clinical and serological outcome measures. The possibility of combining B-cell depletion and anti-BLyS treatment has also been successfully explored.

Low dose versus standard dose rituximab for the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome: A pilot study from a tertiary medical center

BACKGROUND

To investigate the therapeutic effects and safety of low-dose and standard-dose rituximab (RTX) in the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

METHODS

In this real-world study, we included 22 consecutive patients with APS who received RTX. Standard dose (SD) was defined as an overall dosage of RTX ≥ 1000mg in the induction period, and low dose (LD) was defined as an overall dosage of RTX <1000mg.

RESULTS

Of included patients, 1 patients died, 2 patients withdrew and 19 patients completed 6-month follow-up. Nine patients received SD-RTX and 13 patients received LD-RTX, and elder patients [LD-RTX vs. SD-RTX: (49.1 ± 15.5) vs. (35.8 ± 12.3) years, p = 0.044] and patients with later-onset [LD-RTX vs. SD-RTX: (46.8 ± 16.3) vs. (31.3 ± 13.6) years, p = 0.029] were more frequently included in LD-RTX than SD-RTX. Following 6 month RTX treatment, 8 patients (42.1%) achieved complete remission, 8 patients (42.1%) achieved partial remission and 3 patients (15.8%) showed no remission. The titers of anticardiolipin antibodies [baseline vs. 6 months: 30.8 (10.7, 90) vs. 19.5 (2.45, 69.10) U/L, p = 0.023] and the levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate [baseline vs. 6 months: 29 (6, 63) vs. '6 (3, 14) mm/h, p = 0.021] exhibited a significantly decrease in all APS patients. Remission rate and titers of anti-β2-glycoprotein I and lupus anticoagulant did not differ significantly between two groups.

CONCLUSION

RTX might be a safe and effective option for patients with APS, and low dose confers equal efficacy as standard dose. Further cohort studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of antiphospholipid syndrome and ocular manifestations

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder associated with obstetrical complications, thrombotic complications involving both arteries and veins, and non-thrombotic manifestations affecting multiple other systems presenting in various clinical forms. Diagnosis requires the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. The exact pathogenesis of APS is not fully known. However, it has recently been shown that activation of different types of cells by antiphospholipid antibodies plays an important role in thrombosis formation. Ocular involvement is one of the important clinical manifestations of APS and can vary in presentations. Therefore, as an ophthalmologist, it is crucial to be familiar with the ocular findings of APS to prevent further complications that can develop. Furthermore, the ongoing identification of new and specific factors contributing to the pathogenesis of APS may provide new therapeutic options in the management of the disease in the future.

B cells in primary antiphospholipid syndrome: Review and remaining challenges

It is now widely accepted that antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have direct pathogenic effects and that B cells, notably through aPL production, play a key role in the development of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Recent findings strengthened the implication of B cells with the description of specific B cell phenotype abnormalities and inborn errors of immunity involving B cell signaling in APS patients. In addition, it has been shown in preclinical models that cross-reactivity between APS autoantigens and mimotopes expressed by human gut commensals can lead to B cell tolerance breakdown and are sufficient for APS development. However, B cell targeting therapies are surprisingly not as effective as expected in APS compared to other autoimmune diseases. Elucidation of the B cell tolerance breakdown mechanisms in APS patients may help to develop and guide the use of novel therapeutic agents that target B cells or specific immune pathway.

Management of Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), is an acquired autoimmune disorder characterised by thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity, and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Although venous thromboembolism is the most common manifestation, thrombotic events in APS may also occur in virtually any vascular bed, with cerebral circulation being the arterial territory most commonly affected. As APS is a heterogeneous condition, its management should be tailored with a patient-centred approach based on individual risk assessment, which includes the aPL profile, concomitant auto-immune diseases, and traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Although literature data are conflicting regarding primary prophylaxis, there is some evidence indicating that antiplatelet agents may reduce the risk of a first thrombotic event in individuals with a high-risk profile. In patients with thrombotic APS, current evidence-based guidelines recommend lifelong vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), preferably warfarin. The optimal intensity of anticoagulation following arterial thrombosis remains controversial. Arterial thrombosis should be treated either with high-intensity warfarin at a target INR > 3.0, or low-dose aspirin (LDA) combined with moderate-intensity warfarin (INR 2.0-3.0). It is recommended to avoid direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with high-risk APS, mainly those with triple-positive PL and previous arterial events. They would only be used exceptionally in selected patients with low-risk venous thromboembolism (VTE). In low-risk VTE patients currently treated with a DOAC due to warfarin intolerance or a previous unstable International Normalized Ratio on warfarin, the decision of continuing DOACs would be taken in carefully selected patients. In women with obstetric APS, the combination therapy with LDA plus heparin remains the conventional strategy.

Treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the most common acquired thrombophilia. The clinical manifestations of APS are mainly vascular thrombosis (venous and/or arterial) and/or recurrent pregnancy morbidity with the concomitant persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Therefore, the goals of the treatment of patients with APS are reducing the pregnancy morbidity and/or the prevention of thrombotic events during the follow-up. Optimal treatment of APS has long been discussed, due to the heterogeneity of the clinical manifestations and the consequent plurality in the medical specialties involved in managing this condition. This review summarizes the available evidence on primary thromboprophylaxis in aPL-positive individuals with no prior thrombotic events, secondary prophylaxis in patients with positive history for thrombotic events, the management of refractory or difficult cases and the current strategies for the management of APS during pregnancy.

Genetics of Antiphospholipid Syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare heterogenous disorder associated with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies and can present in a wide variety of clinical manifestations including thrombosis and pregnancy complications. Although the etiology of APS remains poorly understood, there is strong support for considering APS as a complex genetic disease in which multiple genetic risk factors, in conjunction with environmental factors, affect its onset, progression, and severity. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the current knowledge of the genetic basis of APS, which remains in its infancy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most genetic studies to date in APS were performed in small cohorts of patients. As a result, only few genetic associations reported are convincing. Several reports suggested genetic associations with HLA class II alleles in APS, and only two genetic loci outside of the HLA region (STAT4 and C1D) reached the threshold for genome-wide level of significance (P < 5 × 10^-8). In this review, we also shed light on the genetic differences among the diverse clinical subsets of APS and briefly discuss the role that DNA methylation changes might play in the pathophysiology of this disease. The genetic basis of APS remains poorly characterized. Larger collaborative multicenter studies using well-characterized patients are needed to comprehensively understand the role of genetic susceptibility in APS.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome and the Neurologist: From Pathogenesis to Therapy

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune antibody-mediated condition characterized by thrombotic events and/or pregnancy morbidity in association with persistent positivity to antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). The nervous system is frequently affected, as intracranial vessels are the most frequent site of arterial pathology. Over the course of years, many other neurological conditions not included in the diagnostic criteria, have been associated with APS. The pathogenic mechanisms behind the syndrome are complex and not fully elucidated. aPL enhance thrombosis, interfering with different pathways. Nevertheless, ischemic injury is not always sufficient to explain clinical features of the syndrome and immune-mediated damage has been advocated. This may be particularly relevant in the context of neurological complications. The reason why only a subgroup of patients develop non-criteria nervous system disorders and what determines the clinical phenotype are questions that remain open. The double nature, thrombotic and immunologic, of APS is also reflected by therapeutic strategies. In this review we summarize known neurological manifestations of APS, revisiting pathogenesis and current treatment options.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: a case-based presentation of renal, neurologic, and hematologic emergencies

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disorder with systemic manifestations and multiorgan involvement. Although primarily diagnosed, and managed in the outpatient setting, it can occasionally present with life-threatening complications that require rapid assessment and urgent aggressive therapy. Areas covered: In our review, we explore three organ systems that are often affected in SLE, but have the potential to present as medical emergencies; these are the kidney, the central nervous system, and the hematologic system. We take a case-based approach to each clinical scenario, with information given sequentially in order to reflect "real-life" situations where management decisions need to be made with limited information. We review the acute management, pathophysiology, diagnostic approach, and treatment along with a review of the literature, for lupus nephritis presenting as rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, acute lupus transverse myelitis, and refractory antiphospholipid syndrome. Expert commentary: At the conclusion of each section, we provide an expert commentary regarding each issue, relating to diagnosis, early management, and current evidence behind treatment recommendations.

The complex treatment including rituximab in the Management of Catastrophic Antiphospholid Syndrome with renal involvement

Background

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a rare, life-threatening form of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) involving many organs and leading to their insufficiency. The pathogenesis of CAPS is associated with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Typical therapy includes anticoagulation, glucocorticoids, therapeutic plasma exchanges and/or intravenous immunoglobulin. Despite this aggressive treatment, the mortality rate of 37% is still high. Novel therapeutic agents are required. Rituximab (RTX) is the most studied drug in APS also used in CAPS. Because of the rarity of CAPS occurrence it is impossible to plan a controlled, randomized study exploring its efficacy in CAPS. Therefore, case reports of its usage can be a source of our knowledge in this matter.

Case presentation

A 35-year-old woman who displayed dyspnoea and peripheral edema was admitted to the Nephrology Clinic because of rapidly progressive renal insufficiency. Her history included autoimmune hemolytic anemia anemia, two miscarriages and the diagnosis of APS with the treatment of heparin and acetylosalicylic acid during her next pregnancy. In spite of this treatment, she gave birth to a dead fetus in 22 Hbd. She then developed CAPS with involvement of the kidneys, brain, skin, peripheral veins and central retinal artery. Lupus anticoagulant and β₂₋glicoprotein-I antibodies were positive. Immediately upon admission to the nephrology clinic, she received anticoagulation and corticosteroids along with therapeutic plasma exchanges. As a supportive treatment hemodialysis sessions were necessary. Under this treatment the amelioration of the general state was observed but renal failure persisted, therefore intravenous immunoglobulin was added. Afterwards, the kidney function recovered and the renal replacement therapy could be stopped. After this therapy, aPL became negative. Four weeks later lupus anticoagulant began to increase. Taking into account the risk factors of the relapse and the life-threatening course of the disease, rituximab was introduced. After administration of 2 g of RTX in three separate doses, we observed no new thrombotic events, the further amelioration of renal function and the negative profile of aPL.

Conclusions

CAPS is a life-threatening condition and a prompt, complex treatment is necessary. Rituximab together with conventional therapy can be an additional option in case of the risk of relapse.

Treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome beyond anticoagulation

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder marked by thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). At the present time, treatment is primarily focused on anticoagulation. However, there is increasing awareness of the mechanisms involved in APS pathogenesis, which has led to the trial of novel therapies targeting those mechanisms. Following a brief review of the etiopathogenesis of and current management strategies in APS, this paper focuses on the evidence for these potential, targeted APS treatments, e.g., hydroxychloroquine, statins, rituximab, belimumab, eculizumab, defibrotide, sirolimus, and peptide therapy.

The treatment of anti-phospholipid syndrome: A comprehensive clinical approach

Anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired pro-thrombotic autoimmune disease that predisposes to thrombotic events and/or obstetric complications, in the persistent presence of anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL). Life long moderate-intensity anticoagulation is the option of choice for aPL-positive patients with a previous thrombosis; critical issues concern the management of those with a history of arterial event due to the high rate of recurrence. Alternatives comprise anti-platelet agents and high-intensity anticoagulation. Low dose aspirin (LDASA) and low molecular weight heparin provide the mainstay of the treatment of obstetric APS, allowing a birth rate in 70% of cases. The management of refractory APS, thrombotic as well as obstetric, is highly debated, but an increasing burden of evidence points towards the beneficial effects of multiple treatments. Similarly, a management envisaging multiple drugs (anticoagulation, steroids, plasma exchange and/or intravenous immunoglobulins) is the most effective approach in catastrophic APS. Asymptomatic aPL carriers are at higher risk of thrombotic and obstetric complications compared to the general population, thus potentially benefitting of a pharmacological intervention. LDASA and hydroxychloroquine can be considered as options, in particular in case of high risk aPL profile, concomitant cardiovascular risk factors or associated autoimmune disease. APS is apparently a simple condition, but its multifaceted nature requires a complex and tailored treatment.

Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Candidate Therapies for a Potentially Lethal Disease

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a potentially lethal disease that presents with rapidly progressive multiple organ thromboses. Anticoagulation, corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasma exchange are the most commonly used treatments for CAPS patients. However, the high mortality despite these medications necessitates new treatment strategies. Following a brief review of current diagnostic and management strategies, we discuss the candidate therapies, i.e., hydroxychloroquine, rituximab, eculizumab, sirolimus, and defibrotide, that can be considered in CAPS patients refractory to traditional treatment.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome With a Distinctive Constellation of Neurological Manifestations: Blue Toes, Red Valves, White Retinal Spots

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) encompasses a hypercoagulable state with a markedly increased risk for cerebrovascular complications. In addition to the classic stroke features of APS, however, there are numerous recently described "non-criteria" neurological conditions such as headaches, seizures, and cognitive impairment. We present a case of APS with uncommon neurological manifestations.

Patient-derived anti-β2GP1 antibodies recognize a peptide motif pattern and not a specific sequence of residues

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome is an autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of so-called antiphospholipid antibodies and clinical manifestations such as recurrent thromboembolic or pregnancy complications. Although the main antigenic determinant for antiphospholipid antibodies has been identified as the β-2-glycoprotein 1 (β2GP1), the precise epitope recognized by antiphospholipid antibodies still remains largely unknown. In the study herein, we wanted to identify a sequence in domain I of β2GP1 able to induce the proliferation of CD4⁺ T cells isolated from antiphospholipid antibody syndrome patients, but not from healthy donors, and to interact with antiphospholipid antibodies. We have characterized a sequence in domain I of β2GP1 that triggers CD4⁺ T-cell proliferation. A comparison of this sequence with the previously reported binding of antiphospholipid antibodies to discontinuous epitope R39-R43 reveals the presence of an indeterminate motif in β2GP1, in which the polarity determines the characteristics and specificity of antiphospholipid antibodies-interacting motifs. Using point mutations, we characterized the main antiphospholipid antibodies-interacting motif as ϕϕϕζζFxC, but also established ϕϕϕζζFxϕ-related motifs as potential antiphospholipid antibodies epitopes, in which ϕ represents nonpolar residues and ζ polar residues, with charges of the residues not being involved. Of specific importance, these different motifs are present at least once in all antiphospholipid antibodies-related receptors described so far. We have further demonstrated, in vitro, that peptides and domains of β2GP1 containing these motifs were able to interact with antiphospholipid antibodies and inhibit their monocyte activating activity. These results established that the antiphospholipid antibodies-interacting motifs are determined by the polarity, but not by the sequence or charge, of amino acids. These data could also contribute to the future development of more sensitive and specific diagnostic tools for antiphospholipid antibody syndrome determination and potential peptide- or β2GP1 domain-based clinical therapies.

Renal involvement in primary antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune disorder characterized by recurrent venous or arterial thrombosis and/or pregnancy-related problems associated with persistently elevated levels of antiphospholipid antibodies. The kidney is a major target organ in both primary and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome. This review describes several aspects of the renal involvement in the primary form of the syndrome, in particular the histological pattern of the so-called antiphospholipid syndrome nephropathy (APSN). APSN is a vascular nephropathy characterized by small vessel vaso-occlusive lesions associated with fibrous intimal hyperplasia of interlobular arteries, recanalizing thrombi in arteries and arterioles, and focal atrophy, a constellation of morphological lesions suggestive of primary antiphospholipid syndrome.

Current status and future prospects for the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a prothrombotic disease characterized by thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (apL). Management of thrombosis is based on long-term oral anticoagulation and patients with arterial events should be treated aggressively. Primary thrombo-prophylaxis is recommended in patients with systemic lupus erythromatosus (SLE) and obstetric APS. Obstetric APS care is based on high-risk management and treatment with aspirin and heparin. Possible future therapies include statins, hydroxychloroquine, rituximab, and new anticoagulant drugs. Current research is focused on targeting components of the complement system, interfering with aPL-mediated cell activation and using tailored peptides to block the pathogenic subpopulation of aPL.

The significance and management of thrombocytopenia in antiphospholipid syndrome

The association between antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and clinical problems goes beyond what is stated in the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria, namely thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity, and thrombocytopenia is the most common non-criteria hematologic manifestation of aPL with a frequency ranging from 20 to 50 %. Thrombocytopenia is rarely severe, and hemorrhage is far less common than thrombosis. However, when anticoagulation is considered, it may constitute a clinical problem with increased bleeding risk. Furthermore, thrombocytopenia represents a risk factor for thrombosis in aPL-positive patients. Therefore, it is important to understand the pathogenesis and the clinical associations of thrombocytopenia to build the right medical approach in aPL-positive patients. In this paper, we review the literature on aPL/APS-associated thrombocytopenia and briefly discuss the other conditions that can result in thrombocytopenia as they have commonalities with APS and their recognition is important to establish the most appropriate treatment strategy.

Immunotherapy in antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a disorder characterized by the association of arterial or venous thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (anticardiolipin antibodies, lupus anticoagulant antibodies, and/or anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies). Thrombosis is the major manifestation in patients with aPLs, but the spectrum of symptoms and signs associated with aPLs has broadened considerably, and other manifestations, such as thrombocytopenia, non-thrombotic neurological syndromes, psychiatric manifestations, livedo reticularis, skin ulcers, hemolytic anemia, pulmonary hypertension, cardiac valve abnormality, and atherosclerosis, have also been related to the presence of those antibodies. Several studies have contributed to uncovering the basis of antiphospholipid antibody pathogenicity, including the targeted cellular components, affected systems, involved receptors, intracellular pathways used, and the effector molecules that are altered in the process. Therapy for thrombosis traditionally has been based on long-term oral anticoagulation; however, bleeding complications and recurrence despite high-intensity anticoagulation can occur. The currently accepted first-line treatment for obstetric APS (OAPS) is low-dose aspirin plus prophylactic unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). However, in approximately 20% of OAPS cases, the final endpoint, i.e. a live birth, cannot be achieved. Based on all the data obtained in different research studies, new potential therapeutic approaches have been proposed, including the use of new oral anticoagulants, statins, hydroxychloroquine, coenzyme Q10, B-cell depletion, platelet and TF inhibitors, peptide therapy or complement inhibition among others. Current best practice in use of these treatments is discussed.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: an update

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) or 'Hughes syndrome' is a prothrombotic disease characterized by thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). More than three decades have passed, and experts are still uncovering new pieces of this disease complex pathogenesis and management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched in literature using MEDLINE and PubMed databases focusing on the latest development on disease pathogenesis, risk assessment of thrombosis and treatment of APS.

RESULTS

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT-mTORC pathway was most recently identified to have a crucial role in activating inflammation among endothelial vessel wall causing vascular lesions in APS. Additionally, new variables are being implemented to assess the risk of thrombosis in patients with APS. Global APS Score (GAPSS) utilizes cardiovascular risk factors and new autoimmune antibodies as part of the score assessment and is the most valid so far. It can be a promising tool in the future for prediction of thrombosis. Anticoagulation remains the cornerstone in APS; however, many new potential therapeutic agents are developing and are currently under investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

The most recent advances in pathogenesis, risk stratification and treatment provide a platform for high yield studies with the ultimate goal of providing the optimal management to patients with APS.

Treatment of Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome: The Rationale of Current Management-An Insight into Future Approaches

Vascular thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity represent the clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), which is serologically characterized by the persistent positivity of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents currently provide the mainstay of APS treatment. However, the debate is still open: controversies involve the intensity and the duration of anticoagulation and the treatment of stroke and refractory cases. Unfortunately, the literature cannot provide definite answers to these controversial issues as it is flawed by many limitations, mainly due to the recruitment of patients not fulfilling laboratory and clinical criteria for APS. The recommended therapeutic management of different aPL-related clinical manifestations is hereby presented, with a critical appraisal of the evidence supporting such approaches. Cutting edge therapeutic strategies are also discussed, presenting the pioneer reports about the efficacy of novel pharmacological agents in APS. Thanks to a better understanding of aPL pathogenic mechanisms, new therapeutic targets will soon be explored. Much work is still to be done to unravel the most controversial issues about APS management: future studies are warranted to define the optimal management according to aPL risk profile and to assess the impact of a strict control of cardiovascular risk factors on disease control.

Profound symptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia: a rare late complication after rituximab treatment for immune thrombocytopenia. Report of 3 cases and systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

B-cell depletion with rituximab (RTX) is widely used to treat autoimmune diseases, especially as second-line therapy for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The incidence of RTX-induced hypogammaglobulinemia is unknown because of heterogeneous follow-up and confounding factors such as concomitant immunosuppressive treatments in most patients. We describe 3 cases and attempted to determine the incidence of RTX-induced hypogammaglobulinemia by a systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 189 ITP patients receiving RTX in 3 referral centers in France and conducted a systematic review of 32 studies (results published 2001-2014) reporting the use of RTX for ITP, particularly searching for symptomatic secondary hypogammaglobulinemia. We also searched for case reports of hypogammaglobulinemia after RTX initiation for ITP.

RESULTS

Of the 189 patients, 3 showed symptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia more than 2years after RTX infusion (initial immunoglobulin level was normal). All 3 presented recurrent severe infections. In 2, the outcome suggested common variable immunodeficiency. In patient 3, the peripheral blood lacked CD19(+)CD20(+) B cells and the bone-marrow B-cell precursor level was impaired. Among 1245 ITP patients in the literature who received RTX for ITP, gammaglobulin level was monitored before and after RTX initiation for 351 (28%). For 192 (55%), dosages were available and we identified 21 patients with secondary hypogammaglobulinemia, usually not symptomatic, 14 of whom had received concomitant dexamethasone. Finally, we found 4 case reports of ITP and symptomatic hypogammaglobulinemia possibly related to RTX according to the authors.

CONCLUSIONS

This large analysis led us to recommend monitoring serum immunoglobulin level before and repeatedly after RTX initiation for ITP. Physicians should be aware of hypogammaglobulinemia as a rare but severe complication of RTX.

Review on Effectiveness of Primary Prophylaxis in aPLs with and without Risk Factors for Thrombosis: Efficacy and Safety

Context. Antiphospholipid antibodies syndrome is an autoimmune disorder that is characterized by the association between presence of antiphospholipid antibodies and risk of thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity. Objectives. To systematically review the evidence for primary prophylaxis in patients with antiphospholipids antibodies syndrome or APS with or without other traditional risk factors of thrombosis when they did not have any thrombotic event yet. Methods. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Allied Health Literature were searched for studies that examined the efficacy and safety of primary prophylaxis in aPL patients from 1990 to February 2013. We examined literature looking at patients with aPLs with other risk factors for thrombosis and aPLs with no additional risk factors for thrombosis. Conclusion. We concluded that, in patients with aPLs, primary prophylaxes with HCQ and aspirin have been observed to reduce the frequency of thrombotic events in the case of asymptomatic aPL-positive patients with SLE. We also in this study concluded that LDA was effective in patients with autoimmune diseases. Independent cardiovascular risk factors include autoimmune defects such as SLE, rheumatoid arthritis, and atherosclerosis, where overall venous thrombosis will be induced by systemic inflammation. This review concludes that HCQ is an effective primary approach when compared to aspirin.

Experience with low-dose rituximab in off-label indications at two tertiary hospitals

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody directed against B cells and is increasingly used to treat a variety of autoimmune conditions. Most published evidence reporting the successful use of rituximab in off-label indications has empirically used a high-dose regimen (either 375 mg/m(2) weekly for 4 weeks, or 1000 mg × 2), which is the approved course of treatment for lymphoma and rheumatoid arthritis patients.

AIMS

The aims of this report are to review the indications, outcomes and adverse events of low-dose (500 mg twice, given 1-2 weeks apart), off-label use of rituximab in our institutions, and to review the available evidence.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective audit of the off-label use of low-dose rituximab at two university teaching, tertiary referral hospitals, from mid-2008 until the end of 2011.

RESULTS

Off-label rituximab was given to 52 patients (53 indications) across a heterogeneous group of autoimmune conditions. Outcomes were known for 46 conditions (affecting 45 patients), and of these, complete responses were observed in 16 (35%) conditions and a further 19 (41%) had a partial response. There was no response to rituximab in 11 (24%) patients. There were eight significant adverse events, mostly related to infectious complications.

CONCLUSION

This case series suggests that low-dose courses of rituximab can be used off-label to treat several severe and/or refractory immunological disorders with a reasonable safety profile; however, further trials are required in many off-label indications.

14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Task Force Report on Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome

The 'Task Force on Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome (CAPS)' was developed on the occasion of the 14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies. The objectives of this Task Force were to assess the current knowledge on pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features, diagnosis and classification, precipitating factors and treatment of this condition in order to address recommendations for future research. This article summarizes the studies analyzed by the Task Force, its recommendations and the future research agenda.

14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Task Force report on obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

Pregnancy morbidity is one of the clinical manifestations used for classification criteria of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). During the 14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies (aPL), a Task Force with internationally-known experts was created to carry out a critical appraisal of the literature available regarding the association of aPL with obstetric manifestations present in actual classification criteria (recurrent early miscarriage, fetal death, preeclampsia and placental insufficiency) and the quality of the evidence that treatment(s) provide benefit in terms of avoiding recurrent adverse obstetric outcomes. The association of infertility with aPL and the effectiveness of the treatment of patients with infertility and positive aPL was also investigated. This report presents current knowledge and limitations of published studies regarding pregnancy morbidity, infertility and aPL, identifying areas that need better investigative efforts and proposing how critical flaws could be avoided in future studies, as suggested by participants of the Task Force. Except for fetal death, there are limitations in the quality of the data supporting the association of aPL with obstetric complications included in the current APS classification criteria. Recommended treatments for all pregnancy morbidity associated to APS also lack well-designed studies to confirm its efficacy. APL does not seem to be associated with infertility and treatment does not improve the outcomes in infertile patients with aPL. In another section of the Task Force, Dr. Jane Salmon reviewed complement-mediated inflammation in reproductive failure in APS, considering new therapeutic targets to obstetric APS (Ob APS).

Revisiting the molecular mechanism of neurological manifestations in antiphospholipid syndrome: beyond vascular damage

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a multiorgan disease often affecting the central nervous system (CNS). Typically, neurological manifestations of APS include thrombosis of cerebral vessels leading to stroke and requiring prompt initiation of treatment with antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulant therapy. In these cases, alterations of the coagulation system at various levels caused by multiple effects of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have been postulated to explain the vascular damage to the CNS in APS. However, several nonvascular neurological manifestations of APS have progressively emerged over the past years. Nonthrombotic, immune-mediated mechanisms altering physiological basal ganglia function have been recently suggested to play a central role in the pathogenesis of these manifestations that include, among others, movement disorders such as chorea and behavioral and cognitive alterations. Similar clinical manifestations have been described in other autoimmune CNS diseases such as anti-NMDAR and anti-VGCK encephalitis, suggesting that the spectrum of immune-mediated basal ganglia disorders is expanding, possibly sharing some pathophysiological mechanisms. In this review, we will focus on thrombotic and nonthrombotic neurological manifestations of APS with particular attention to immune-mediated actions of aPL on the vascular system and the basal ganglia.

14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies: task force report on antiphospholipid syndrome treatment trends

Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is characterized by vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity occurring in patients with persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). The primary objective of the APS Treatment Trends Task Force, created as part of the 14th International Congress on aPL, was to systematically review the potential future treatment strategies for aPL-positive patients. The task force chose as future clinical research directions: a) determining the necessity for controlled clinical trials in venous thromboembolism with the new oral direct thrombin or anti-factor Xa inhibitors pending the results of the ongoing rivaroxaban in APS (RAPS) trial, and designing controlled clinical trials in other forms of thrombotic APS; b) systematically analyzing the literature as well as aPL/APS registries, and creating specific registries for non-warfarin/heparin anticoagulants; c) increasing recruitment for an ongoing primary thrombosis prevention trial, and designing secondary thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity prevention trials with hydroxychloroquine; d) determining surrogate markers to select patients for statin trials; e) designing controlled studies with rituximab and other anti-B-cell agents; f) designing mechanistic and clinical studies with eculizumab and other complement inhibitors; and g) chemically modifying peptide therapy to improve the half-life and minimize immunogenicity. The report also includes recommendations for clinicians who consider using these agents in difficult-to-manage aPL-positive patients.

B-Cell Targeted Therapies in Autoimmune Cytopenias and Thrombosis

Ever since the advent of Rituximab and subsequently the emergence of other compounds targeting B cells, a cornucopia of medical applications have been found for this family of compounds. After their establishment as standard of care in many conditions such as rituximab in lymphoma and rheumatoid arthritis, they have been progressively found to aid in the treatment of many other conditions. This area constituted a fertile area of research in the past 12 years. Physicians have investigated the B-cell depleting agents use in cases of autoimmune hematologic cytopenias such as immune thrombocytopenia, Evans syndrome, cold and warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and other thrombophilic disorders such as the antiphospholipid syndrome and thrombocytopenic purpura. This chapter presents a historical perspective reviewing the various studies that have been published in this field. In addition, it offers a current assessment of the evidence regarding the use of B-cell depleting agents in the aforementioned conditions.

Occult pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma presenting as catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome

Catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (CAPS) is characterized by fulminant thrombosis of the arterial and venous beds of multiple organ systems over a relatively short period of time and with a high mortality rate. Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma of the lung has never been reported as a causative or precipitating factor for CAPS in the CAPS registry database. The present study describes a rare case of pulmonary MALT lymphoma of the lung that presented as CAPS. A 19-year-old Hispanic female presented with shortness of breath and abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest and abdomen revealed multiple portal vein thromboses and bilateral pulmonary nodules. Within one week of presentation, the patient developed a straight sinus thrombosis and upper extremity deep vein thrombosis, which led to shortness of breath. A biopsy of the lung nodule revealed MALT lymphoma. The present case illustrates a rarely reported pulmonary MALT lymphoma presenting as CAPS in a young female. The patient was successfully treated with 90 mg/m² bendamustine on days one and two and rituximab 375 mg/m² on day one of each 28-day cycle. Complete remission of the lung nodules was observed following three cycles of treatment, as visualized by positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scan. Fondaparinux was identified as a feasible anticoagulation drug of choice for this case. At seven months post-treatment, the patient continues to be stable with no further evidence of thrombosis and is currently undergoing rituximab maintenance therapy every six months for two years. A repeat lupus anticoagulant antibody assay turned and remained negative during the clinical follow-up period. A prompt diagnosis and early aggressive treatment is potentially curative and may dramatically decrease the mortality risk. Future studies should explore the role of rituximab in the management of CAPS-associated B-cell lymphoid malignancies.

Latest advances in connective tissue disorders

The connective tissue disorders comprise a number of related conditions that include systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the antiphospholipid (Hughes) syndrome, scleroderma, myositis and Sjögren's syndrome. They are characterized by autoantibody production and other immune-mediated dysfunction. There are common clinical and serological features with some patients having multiple overlapping connective tissue disorders. The latest advances include new approaches to therapy, including more focused utilization of existing therapies and the introduction of biological therapies in SLE, more precise protocols for assessment of severe disease manifestations such as in interstitial lung disease and pulmonary artery hypertension in scleroderma, new antibodies for disease characterization in myositis and new approaches to patient assessment in Sjögren's syndrome. B cells have a critical role in most, if not all of these disorders such that B-cell depletion or suppression of B-cell activating cytokines improves disease in many patients. In particular, the introduction of rituximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the CD20 molecule on B cells, into clinical practice for rheumatoid arthritis and B-cell lymphoma has been a key driver of experimental approaches to therapy in connective tissue disorders. Genetic studies also suggest a role for the innate immune system in disease pathogenesis, suggesting further future targets for biological therapies over the next few years.