Smoking Cessation Counseling Improves Quality of Care and Surgical Outcomes with Financial Gain for a Vascular Practice

Socioeconomic Distressed Communities Index associated with worse limb-related outcomes after infrainguinal bypass

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have demonstrated that socioeconomic factors may affect surgical outcomes. Analyses in vascular surgery have been limited by the availability of individual or community-level socioeconomic data. We sought to determine whether the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), a composite socioeconomic ranking by ZIP code, could predict short- and long-term outcomes for patients with peripheral artery disease.

METHODS

All Virginia Quality Initiative patients (n = 2578) undergoing infrainguinal bypass (2011-2017) within a region of 17 centers were assigned a composite DCI score. The score was developed by the Economic Innovation Group and is normally distributed from 0 (no distress) to 100 (severe distress) based on measures of community unemployment, education level, poverty rate, median income, business growth, and housing vacancies. Severely distressed communities were defined as the top quartile DCI (>75). Hierarchical regression assessed short-term outcomes, and time-to-event analyses assessed long-term results.

RESULTS

Infrainguinal bypass patients in this study came from disproportionately distressed communities, with 29% of patients living within the highest distress DCI quartile (P < .0001), with high variability by hospital (DCI range, 12-67). These patients from severely distressed areas were younger, more likely to smoke, and disproportionately African American and had higher rates of medical comorbidities (all P < .05). Whereas patients from severely distressed communities had an equivalent rate of 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (5% vs 4%; P = .86), they had increased rates of major adverse limb events (MALEs) at 13% vs 10% (P = .03). This trend persisted in the long term, with higher 1-year estimates of MALEs (21% vs 17%; P = .01) as well as the components of amputation (17% vs 12%; P = .006) and thrombectomy (11% vs 6%; P = .002). Patients with high socioeconomic distress also had higher rates of occlusion (17% vs 11%; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, patients from severely distressed communities were found to have increased rates of MALEs, an association that persisted long term. Mitigating risk associated with socioeconomic determinants of health has the potential to improve outcomes for patients with peripheral artery disease.

The effect of the duration of preoperative smoking cessation timing on outcomes after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and lower extremity bypass

OBJECTIVE

Smoking has been associated with poor postoperative outcomes across various surgical procedures. However, the effect of quitting smoking preoperatively for elective operations is unclear. Our goal was to assess the temporal effect of smoking cessation before elective lower extremity bypass (LEB) and open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair on perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative was reviewed for all patients with a documented smoking history and who underwent an elective LEB or open AAA repair from 2010 to 2017. Patients were then categorized into three groups: long-term smoking cessation (LTSC; defined as quitting smoking ≥8 weeks before surgery), short-term smoking cessation (STSC; defined as quitting smoking < 8 weeks before surgery), and current smokers (CS). Patient and procedure details were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analysis for crude and propensity-matched data were used to compare outcomes among groups.

RESULTS

We identified 15,950 patients with a documented smoking history who underwent an elective LEB (43.3% LTSC, 2.2% STSC, 54.5% CS) and 5215 patients who underwent an elective open AAA repair (42.9% LTSC, 2.4% STSC, 54.7% CS). LTSC patients compared with STSC and CS, respectively, were more often obese, diabetic, on aspirin, on a statin, had coronary artery disease, and had congestive heart failure, but were less likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (all P < .05). Perioperative outcomes demonstrated significant differences comparing LTSC with STSC and CS for myocardial infarction (3.4% vs 1.4% vs 1.4%), dysrhythmia (4.2% vs 2.5% vs 2.7%), 30-day mortality (1.6% vs .3% vs .9%), in-hospital mortality (1.1% vs 0% vs 0.5%; all P < .001) and congestive heart failure (1.8% vs .8% vs 1.5%; P = .003). There was no difference in outcomes after analysis of propensity-matched data for LTSC or STSC on any postoperative outcomes for LEB. For open AAA repair, LTSC compared with CS patients, respectively, were older, more often male, obese, on a statin, diabetic, and less frequently had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < .05 for all). Perioperative outcomes demonstrated differences in pulmonary complications when comparing LTSC with STSC and CS (9.5% vs 8.0% vs 12.5%; P = .002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that LTSC patients compared with CS were less likely to experience pulmonary complications (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.79; P < .001). Propensity-matched multivariate analysis confirmed that LTSC remained significantly less likely to encounter pulmonary complications (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.74; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our propensity-matched, risk-adjusted cohort, LTSC and STSC were not associated with perioperative outcomes after elective LEB. LTSC was associated with a significantly decreased odds of pulmonary complications after elective open AAA repair. STSC was not associated with perioperative outcomes after elective open AAA repair. If time permits, a longer period of smoking cessation should be attempted before elective open AAA repair.

Drivers of Cost for Pancreatic Surgery: It's Not About Hospital Volume

BACKGROUND

Outcomes for pancreatic resection have been studied extensively due to the high morbidity and mortality rates, with high-volume centers achieving superior outcomes. Ongoing investigations include healthcare costs, given the national focus on reducing expenditures. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the relationships between pancreatic surgery costs with perioperative outcomes and volume status.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 27,653 patients who underwent elective pancreatic resections from October 2013 to June 2017 using the Vizient database. Costs were calculated from charges using cost-charge ratios and adjusted for geographic variation. Generalized linear modeling adjusting for demographic, clinical, and operation characteristics was performed to assess the relationships between cost and length of stay, complications, in-hospital mortality, readmissions, and hospital volume. High-volume centers were defined as hospitals performing ≥ 19 operations annually.

RESULTS

The unadjusted mean cost for pancreatic resection and corresponding hospitalization was $20,352. There were no differences in mean costs for pancreatectomies performed at high- and low-volume centers [- $1175, 95% confidence interval (CI) - $3254 to $904, p = 0.27]. In subgroup analysis comparing adjusted mean costs at high- and low-volume centers, there was no difference among patients without an adverse outcome (- $99, 95% CI - $1612 to 1414, p = 0.90), one or more adverse outcomes (- $1586, 95% CI - $4771 to 1599, p = 0.33), or one or more complications (- $2835, 95% CI - $7588 to 1919, p = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

While high-volume hospitals have fewer adverse outcomes, there is no relationship between surgical volume and costs, which suggests that, in itself, surgical volume is not an indicator of improved healthcare efficiency reflected by lower costs. Patient referral to high-volume centers may not reduce overall healthcare expenditures for pancreatic operations.