Lower Extremity Lymphedema Management after Gynecologic Cancer Surgery: A Review of Current Management Strategies

Prevalence of lower extremity edema following inguinal lymphadenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) can develop because of inguinal lymph node dissection in the treatment of gynecologic, genitourinary, and dermatological malignancies. To optimize patient counseling and patient selection for microsurgical interventions aimed at preventing or treating LEL, its prevalence and associated patient characteristics must be accurately documented. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a comprehensive overview of literature on the reported prevalence of LEL in patients undergoing inguinal lymphadenectomy.

Methods

From Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases, 23 studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. This review was conducted in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Exposure tool.

Results

Random-effects meta-analyses of proportions estimated a 24% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17-31) pooled prevalence of LEL with a high degree of heterogeneity between the studies (I2 =96%, p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in LEL prevalence based on the indications for inguinal lymphadenectomy. The pooled LEL prevalence was 25.75% (95% CI: 0.00-96.16) for patients who underwent lymphadenectomy for melanoma, 12.22% (95% CI: 1.03-23.40) for penile cancer, 30.96% (95% CI: 21.08-40.84) for vulvar cancer, and 13.62% (95% CI: 0.00-51.02) for miscellaneous indications.

Conclusion

The findings from this study emphasize the importance of considering malignancy etiology when assessing the risk of LEL following inguinal lymphadenectomy. This knowledge could aid physicians in informing patients about the risk of LEL, while also facilitating proper patient selection for microsurgical interventions.

Interventions for Prevention and Management of Gynecological Cancer-Related Lower Limb Lymphedema: A Systematic Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

This scoping review aims to map out evidence on interventions for reducing lower limb lymphedema incidence and symptoms after gynecological cancer surgery.

METHODS

This scoping review followed the methods and protocol outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute Methods Manual. Five databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched in January 2024.

RESULTS

The review included 15 interventions primarily designed to prevent and manage cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema. Most studies have examined the effect of interventions on the development of lymphedema-related symptoms and quality of life. Most studies tested complex decongestive therapy (CDT) (n = 6, 39.9%), including various techniques, such as manual lymphatic drainage, compression, exercise, and skincare. Of the interventions, 86.6% improved at least one outcome measurement, such as quality of life, lymphedema incidence, symptoms, and lower limb volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence shows that the use of interventions appears to have the potential to reduce the risk and symptoms of lymphedema and improve the quality of life in women undergoing gynecological cancer treatment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Developing and testing comprehensive lymphedema education and management strategies in nursing practice is essential to optimize patient outcomes and enhance the quality of life for women undergoing gynecological cancer treatment.

Depression and Psychological Distress in Patients with Lower Extremity Lymphedema: A Mixed-Method Study

Background: Lower extremity lymphedema is a chronic and incurable condition. Treatment options for lymphedema have continued to advance and prognosis has improved; however, the condition still poses a substantial negative impact on patients' mental health. Therefore, the key questions raised in this study are "How many patients with lower limb lymph have depression symptoms?" and "Are there any differences in the symptoms and distress factors of patients with lower extremity lymphedema, and how do they experience distress?" Methods and Results: A total of 112 lower extremity lymphedema patients from June 2021 to December 2023 were enrolled in the study. Quantitative and qualitative data of patients were collected and analyzed. Participants completed the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and we interviewed participants with moderate/severe depressive symptoms with score ≥10. A total of 83 participants completed this study. Overall, 39.76% of the participants had a PHQ-9 score ≥5, indicating that they had mild depressive symptoms; 13.25% of the participants had a PHQ-9 score ≥10, indicating that they had moderate or severe depressive symptoms. Compared with participants who had received treatment before the study, participants who did not receive any treatment before the study had a higher risk of depression (χ2 = 6.705, p = 0.031). There was no significant difference in the degree of depression in patients with different stages of lymphedema (χ2 = 8.430, p = 0.077). From the qualitative interview data, we extracted five common themes: "loss of self," "isolation from surroundings," "discomfort caused by symptoms and complications," "concern about the progression or deterioration of the original malignant tumor," and "fear that surgical treatment may be ineffective." Conclusions: This study found that patients with lower extremity lymphedema are prone to psychological symptoms of depression. To clarify the reason that affect psychological distress is important information to improve the psychological health support for patients with lower extremity lymphedema.

Indocyanine green fluorescence applied to gynecologic oncology: beyond sentinel lymph node

Indocyanine green (ICG), a well-known molecule employed in medicine for over five decades, has emerged as a versatile dye widely embraced across various surgical disciplines. In gynecologic oncology, its prevalent use revolves around the detection of sentinel lymph nodes. However, the true potential of ICG extends beyond this singular application, owing to its pragmatic utility, cost-effectiveness, and safety profile. Furthermore, ICG has been introduced in the theranostic landscape, marking a significant juncture in the evolution of its clinical utility. This narrative review aims to describe the expanding horizons of ICG fluorescence in gynecologic oncology, beyond the sentinel lymph node biopsy. The manifold applications reported within this manuscript include: 1) lymphography; 2) angiography; 3) nerve visualization; 4) ICG-driven resections; and 5) theranostic. The extensive exploration across these numerous applications, some of which are still in the preclinical phase, serves as a hypothesis generator, aiming to stimulate the development of clinical studies capable of expanding the use of this drug in our field, enhancing the care of gynecological cancer patients.

Lymphedema self-assessment among endometrial cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL), which causes ankle, leg, and feet swelling, poses a significant challenge for endometrial cancer survivors, impacting physical functioning and psychological well-being. Inconsistent LEL diagnostic methods result in wide-ranging LEL incidence estimates.

METHODS

We calculated the cumulative incidence of LEL based on survivor-reported Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) responses in addition to survivor- and nurse-reported leg circumference measurements among a pilot sample of 50 endometrial cancer survivors (27 White, 23 Black) enrolled in the ongoing population-based Carolina Endometrial Cancer Study.

RESULTS

Self-leg circumference measurements were perceived to be difficult and were completed by only 17 survivors. Diagnostic accuracy testing measures (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value) compared the standard nurse-measured ≥ 10% difference in leg circumference measurements to GCLQ responses. At a mean of ~11 months post-diagnosis, 54% of survivors met established criteria for LEL based on ≥ 4 GCLQ cutpoint while 24% had LEL based on nurse-measurement. Percent agreement, sensitivity, and specificity approximated 60% at a threshold of ≥ 5 GCLQ symptoms. However, Cohen's kappa, a measure of reliability that corrects for agreement by chance, was highest at ≥ 4 GCLQ symptoms (κ = 0.27).

CONCLUSION

Our findings emphasize the need for high quality measurements of LEL that are feasible for epidemiologic study designs among endometrial cancer survivors. Future studies should use patient-reported survey measures to assess lymphedema burden and quality of life outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors.

Conservative treatment versus lymphaticovenular anastomosis for early-stage lower extremity lymphedema

OBJECTIVE

Several options for the treatment of lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) can be broadly classified into conservative treatment, such as compression garments and decongestive lymphatic therapy, and surgical treatment, such as lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA). The purpose of our study was to clarify the superiority of these treatments by comparing the outcomes of LVA with those of conservative treatment for early-stage LEL.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study. The patients with LEL who presented to our department between January 2015 and December 2022 were identified and classified into two groups: conservative treatment and surgical treatment. The LEL indexes, calculated from the four lower extremity circumferences and the body mass index, were compared at the 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 101 patients with LEL, 53 with 72 affected limbs (conservative treatment, 39 patients and 53 affected limbs; surgical treatment, 15 patients and 19 affected limbs) were included in the present analysis. The therapeutic effect for reducing edema, as determined by comparing the corrected LEL index at 12 months (103.7 ± 12.7 vs 91.9 ± 10.7; P = .005) and 24 months (103.1 ± 12.9 vs 83.8 ± 7.2; P < .001), was significantly higher in the surgical treatment group than that in the conservative treatment group. The conservative treatment group showed little change in the corrected LEL index at ≤24 months of follow-up (+3.1%; P = .299). In contrast, the surgical treatment group showed a significant reduction in edema at 24 months according to the corrected LEL index (-16.2%; P = .019).

CONCLUSIONS

In early-stage LEL, conservative treatment centered on compression therapy alone only maintained edema (ie, edema did not worsen or improve). In contrast, LVA with compression therapy reduced edema.

Evaluation of incontinence and lymphedema in gynecological cancer patients along with their impact on the quality of life

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the patients who developed both urinary incontinence and lymphedema in gynecological cancer survivors and to investigate the impact of these conditions on the quality of life among these patients.

METHODS

Our study included 56 patients who have lymphedema and urinary incontinence which started within first 2 years after surgery for gynecological cancer. We evaluated the presence of urinary incontinence by Overactive Bladder Assessment Tool (OABT) and Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI). Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) was used to assess the quality of life.

RESULTS

OABT and UDI scores were found to be statistically significantly increased in patients with grade 3 lymphedema (respectively p: 0.006, p: 0.008). A statistically significant difference was found between lymphedema grade 1-2-3 patients in terms of IIQ-7 (p:0.002). The difference was statistically significant between the grade 1-3 (p:0.001) and grade 2-3 (p:0.013) groups. We did not find any correlation between age, type of cancer, radiotherapy, and urinary incontinence. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between BMI and OABT, UDI scores (respectively, r = 0.43, p = 0.001; r = 0.38, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that there was a relationship between urinary incontinence and grade 3 lymphedema in gynecological cancer survivors. Grade 3 lymphedema increases urinary incontinence and worsens daily living functions in these patients.

MRI of Lymphedema

Lymphedema is a devastating disease that has no cure. Management of lymphedema has evolved rapidly over the past two decades with the advent of surgeries that can ameliorate symptoms. MRI has played an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and evaluation of lymphedema, as it provides high spatial resolution of the distribution and severity of soft tissue edema, characterizes diseased lymphatic channels, and assesses secondary effects such as fat hypertrophy. Many different MR techniques have been developed for the evaluation of lymphedema, and the modality can be tailored to suit the needs of a lymphatic clinic. In this review article we provide an overview of lymphedema, current management options, and the current role of MRI in lymphedema diagnosis and management. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

Clinical Utility of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Parameters for Evaluating Patients with Lower Limb Lymphedema after Lymphovenous Anastomosis

BACKGROUND

 In lymphedema, lymphatic fluid accumulates in the interstitial space, and localized swelling appears. Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) is the most widely used surgery to rebuild a damaged lymphatic system; however, assessing outcome of LVA involves performing volume measurements, which provides limited information on body composition changes. Therefore, we analyzed the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) parameters that can reflect the status of lymphedema patients who underwent LVA.

METHODS

 We retrospectively reviewed records of 42 patients with unilateral lower extremity lymphedema who had LVA. We measured the perioperative BIA parameters such as extracellular water (ECW) ratio and volume as defined by the percentage of excess volume (PEV). We evaluated the relationship between the amount of change in PEV and in BIA parameters before and after surgery. We confirmed the correlation between ΔPEV and BIA parameters using Spearman's correlation.

RESULTS

 Most patients included had secondary lymphedema due to cancer. Average age was 51.76 years and average body mass index was 23.27. PEV and all BIA parameters after surgery showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared with preoperative measurements. The ECW ratio aff/unaff showed the strongest correlation with PEV with a correlation coefficient of 0.473 (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

 Our findings suggest that BIA parameters, especially ECW ratio aff/unaff could reflect the status of patients with lower limb lymphedema after LVA. Appropriate use of BIA parameters may be useful in the postoperative surveillance of patients.

Overview of Lymphedema for Physicians and Other Clinicians: A Review of Fundamental Concepts

Lymphedema has historically been underrated in clinical practice, education, and scholarship to the detriment of many patients with this chronic, debilitating condition. The mechanical insufficiency of the lymphatic system causes the abnormal accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the interstitium, which triggers a cascade of adverse consequences such as fat deposition and fibrosis. As the condition progresses, patients present with extremity heaviness, itchiness, skin infections, and, in later stages, dermal fibrosis, skin papillomas, acanthosis, and other trophic skin changes. Correspondingly, lymphedema results in psychological morbidity, including anxiety, depression, social avoidance, and a decreased quality of life, encompassing emotional, functional, physical, and social domains. For this review, we conducted a literature search using PubMed and EMBASE and herein summarize the evidence related to the fundamental concepts of lymphedema. This article aims to raise awareness of this serious condition and outline and review the fundamental concepts of lymphedema.

Effectiveness of Mobiderm® bandages in the treatment of cancer-related secondary lymphedema: A pilot study

Secondary lymphedema is a clinically incurable disease that commonly occurs following surgical cancer treatment and/or radiation. One of the most common forms of lymphedema treatment is complete decongestive therapy (CDT). This study aimed to investigate the clinical effects of new compression bandages (Mobiderm® bandages) in patients with secondary lymphedema after cancer treatment. This study included 17 patients with ipsilateral limb lymphedema after cancer treatment (one male and 16 female patients; age, 45-80 years). Patients were divided into the Mobiderm® bandage group (n = 9) and classical bandage group (n = 8). The International Society of Lymphology (ISL) stage was also evaluated. Limb circumference was measured at 5 to 6 sites per limb to identify the maximal circumference difference (MCD) between the affected and unaffected limbs. Pre-and posttreatment MCD were analyzed. After intensive CDT, both the Mobiderm® bandage group (1.2 ± 0.56 cm) and classical bandage group (0.85 ± 0.40 cm) had a significant decrease in MCD compared to pretreatment (P < .05). However, in patients with ISL stage 2, the mean MCD decrease rate was greater in the Mobiderm® bandage group (22.82 ± 10.92 %) than in the classical bandage group (12.18 ± 8.1 1%)(P = .045). Both new bandages (Mobiderm® bandages and classical bandages) reduced the circumference of limb edema in patients with secondary lymphedema after cancer treatment. This study findings suggest that Mobiderm® bandages as an alternative modality for controlling ISL stage 2 lymphedema.

Treatment of Early-Stage Gynecological Cancer-Related Lower Limb Lymphedema by Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis-The Triple Incision Approach

Background and Objectives: Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) is one of the most relevant chronic and disabling sequelae after gynecological cancer therapy involving pelvic lymphadenectomy (PL). Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is a safe and effective procedure to treat LEL, particularly indicated in early-stage cases when conservative therapies are insufficient to control the swelling. Usually, preoperative assessment of these patients shows patent and peristaltic lymphatic vessels that can be mapped throughout the limb to plan the sites of skin incision to perform LVA. The aim of this study is to report the efficacy of our approach based on planning LVA in three areas of the lower limb in improving early-stage gynecological cancer-related lymphedema (GCRL) secondary to PL. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who underwent LVA for the treatment of early-stage GCRL following PL. Patients who had undergone groin dissection were excluded. Our preoperative study based on indocyanine green lymphography (ICG-L) and color doppler ultrasound (CDU) planned three incision sites located in the groin, in the medial surface of the distal third of the thigh, and in the upper half of the leg, to perform LVA. The primary outcome measure was the variation of the mean circumference of the limb after surgery. The changes between preoperative and postoperative limbs’ measures were analyzed by Student’s t-test. p values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: Thirty-three patients were included. In every patient, three incision sites were employed to perform LVA. A total of 119 LVA were established, with an average of 3.6 for each patient. The mean circumference of the operated limb showed a significant reduction after surgery, decreasing from 37 cm ± 4.1 cm to 36.1 cm ± 4.4 (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Our results suggest that in patients affected by early-stage GCRL secondary to PL, the placement of incision sites in all the anatomical subunits of the lower limb is one of the key factors in achieving good results after LVA.

Association of Lower Extremity Lymphedema With Physical Functioning and Activities of Daily Living Among Older Survivors of Colorectal, Endometrial, and Ovarian Cancer

Importance

Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) is associated with decreased physical functioning (PF) and activities of daily living (ADLs) limitations. However, the prevalence of LEL in older survivors of cancer is unknown.

Objectives

To examine LEL among older female survivors of colorectal, endometrial, or ovarian cancer and investigate the association of LEL with PF and ADLs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This secondary analysis of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Life and Longevity After Cancer (LILAC) study was conducted using data from postmenopausal women enrolled at 40 US centers. Participants were women who had a prior diagnosis of endometrial, colorectal, or ovarian cancer and who had completed the WHI LILAC baseline and year 1 follow-up questionnaires as of September 2017.

Exposures

The 13-item Lower Extremity Lymphedema Screening Questionnaire in Women was used to determine LEL (ie, score ≥5).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Validated surveys were used to assess PF and ADLs.

Results

Among 900 older women diagnosed with endometrial, colorectal, or ovarian cancer, the mean (SD) age was 78.5 (5.9) years and the mean (range) time since cancer diagnosis was 8.75 (1.42-20.23) years. Overall, 292 women (32.4%) reported LEL, with the highest LEL prevalence among survivors of ovarian cancer (38 of 104 women [36.5%]), followed by survivors of endometrial cancer (122 of 375 women [32.5%]) and colorectal cancer (132 of 421 women [31.4%]). Compared with women without LEL, women with LEL had a PF score that was lower by a mean (SE) 16.8 (1.7) points (P < .001) and higher odds of needing help with ADLs (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% CI, 1.64-3.67). In the association of LEL with PF, the mean (SE) decrease in PF score was greatest among survivors of colorectal cancer (-21.8 [2.6]) compared with survivors of endometrial cancer (-13.3 [2.7]) and ovarian cancer (-12.8 [5.2]). Additionally, among survivors of colorectal cancer, LEL was associated with increased odds of needing help with ADLs (OR, 3.59; 95% CI, 1.94-6.66), while there was no such association among survivors of endometrial cancer or ovarian cancer. However, there were no interaction associations between LEL and cancer type for either outcome. Additionally, the overall mean (SE) difference in PF between women with and without LEL was greater among those aged 80 years and older (-19.4 [2.6] points) vs those aged 65 to 79 years (-14.9 [2.2] points). However, among survivors of colorectal cancer, the mean (SE) difference in PF score was greater among women aged 65 to 79 years (-22.9 [3.7] points) vs those aged 80 years or older (-20.8 [3.7] points) (P for 3-way interaction = .03).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found that nearly one-third of older female survivors of colorectal, endometrial, or ovarian cancer experienced LEL and that LEL was associated with decreased PF and increased odds of needing help with ADLs. These findings suggest that clinicians may need to regularly assess LEL among older survivors of cancer and provide effective interventions to reduce LEL symptoms and improve PF for this population.

Lymphedema Is a Significant Risk Factor for Failure After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema is a chronic disease characterized by fluid buildup and swelling that can lead to skin and soft-tissue fibrosis and recurring soft-tissue infections. Literature with regard to the increased risk of complications following a surgical procedure in patients with lymphedema is emerging, but the impact of lymphedema in the setting of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to review outcomes following primary THA performed in patients with lymphedema compared with a matched cohort without lymphedema.

METHODS

Using our institutional total joint registry and medical records, we identified 83 patients (57 were female and 26 were male) who underwent THA with ipsilateral lymphedema. For comparison, these patients were matched 1:6 (based on sex, age, date of the surgical procedure, and body mass index [BMI]) to a group of 498 patients without lymphedema who underwent primary THA for osteoarthritis. Subsequently, postoperative complications and implant survivorship were evaluated for each group. The mean follow-up for each group was 6 years. Survivorship was compared between cohorts using Kaplan-Meier methodology and included both survivorship free of infection and survivorship free of reoperation or revision. Univariate Cox regression analysis was utilized to assess the association between patient factors for the time to event outcomes noted above.

RESULTS

In patients with a history of lymphedema, there was an increased risk of complications (hazard ratio [HR], 1.97; p < 0.01), including reoperation for any cause (HR, 3.16; p < 0.01) and postoperative infection (HR, 4.48; p < 0.01). The 5-year infection-free survival rate was 90.3% for patients with lymphedema compared with 97.7% for patients without lymphedema (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lymphedema are at increased risk for complications, including reoperation and infection, following primary THA. These data emphasize the importance of appropriate preoperative counseling in this population and should encourage efforts to identify methods to improve outcomes, including further investigation of the effects of preoperative optimization of lymphedema prior to THA and methods for improved perioperative management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Lymphedema in Endometrial Cancer Survivor: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Background: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries. Treatment-related lymphedema negatively affects the quality of life and function of patients. This study investigated the cumulative incidence and risk factors of, and utilization of health care resources for, lymphedema in patients with endometrial cancer. Methods: We conducted a nationwide, retrospective cohort study of women with endometrial cancer who underwent cancer-direct treatment using the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database. Patients were categorized by age, region, income, and treatment modality. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze the incidence and risk factors of lymphedema. We also analyzed utilization of health care resources for lymphedema using diagnostic and treatment claim codes. Results: A total of 19,027 patients with endometrial cancer were evaluated between January 2004 and December 2017. Among them, 2493 (13.1%) developed lymphedema. Age (<40 years, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1 vs. 40–59 years, aOR = 1.413; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.203–1.66 vs. 60+ years, aOR = 1.472; 95% CI 1.239–1.748) and multimodal treatment (surgery only, aOR = 1 vs. surgery + radiation + chemotherapy, aOR = 2.571; 95% CI 2.27–2.912) are considered to be possible risk factors for lymphedema in patients with endometrial cancer (p < 0.001). The utilization of health care resources for the treatment of lymphedema has increased over the years. Conclusions: Lymphedema is a common complication affecting women with endometrial cancer and leads to an increase in national healthcare costs. Post-treatment surveillance of lymphedema, especially in high-risk groups, is needed.

Cohort profile: an observational longitudinal data collection of health aspects in a cohort of female cancer survivors with a history of pelvic radiotherapy-a population-based cohort in the western region of Sweden

PURPOSE

The study 'Health among women after pelvic radiotherapy' was conducted in response to the need for more advanced and longitudinal data concerning long-term radiotherapy-induced late effects and chronic states among female cancer survivors. The objective of this paper is to detail the cohort profile and the study procedure in order to provide a sound basis for future analyses of the study cohort.

PARTICIPANTS

Since 2011, and still currently ongoing, participants have been recruited from a population-based study cohort including all female patients with cancer, over 18 years of age, treated with pelvic radiotherapy with curative intent at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg, in the western region of Sweden, which covers 1.7 million of the Swedish population. The dataset presented here consists of baseline data provided by 605 female cancer survivors and 3-month follow-up data from 260 individuals with gynaecological, rectal or anal cancer, collected over a 6-year period.

FINDINGS TO DATE

Data have been collected from 2011 onwards. To date, three studies have been published using the dataset reporting long-term radiation-induced intestinal syndromes and late adverse effects affecting sexuality, the urinary tract, the lymphatic system and physical activity. These projects include the evaluation of interventions developed by and provided in a nurse-led clinic.

FUTURE PLANS

This large prospective cohort offers the possibility to study health outcomes in female pelvic cancer survivors undergoing a rehabilitation intervention in a nurse-led clinic, and to study associations between demographics, clinical aspects and long-term late effects. Analysis focusing on the effect of the interventions on sexual health aspects, preinterventions and postinterventions, is currently ongoing. The cohort will be expanded to comprise the entire data collection from 2011 to 2020, including baseline data and data from 3-month and 1-year follow-ups after interventions. The data will be used to study conditions and treatment-induced late effects preintervention and postintervention.

Lymphedema: A Significant Risk Factor for Infection and Implant Failure After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema is characterized by fluid buildup and swelling, leading to skin fibrosis and recurring soft-tissue infections. There is a paucity of data examining the impact of lymphedema in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of TKA in patients with lymphedema compared with a matched cohort with primary osteoarthritis.

METHODS

One hundred forty-four knees underwent primary TKA with a preceding diagnosis of ipsilateral lymphedema. The mean follow-up was 7 years. A blinded 1:2 match of knees with lymphedema to a group of knees without lymphedema undergoing primary TKA was performed. Matching criteria included sex, age, date of surgery, and body mass index. The mean follow-up for the comparison cohort was 8 years.

RESULTS

Lymphedema increased revision hazard ratio [HR] 7.60; P < 0.001), reoperation (HR, 2.87; P < 0.001), and infection (HR, 6.19; P < 0.001) in addition to periprosthetic fracture (P = 0.04) and tibial component loosening (P = 0.01). The mean time to infection trended toward later time points in knees with lymphedema (19 versus 2 months, P = 0.25).

DISCUSSION

Lymphedema increased the risk of revision, reoperation, and infection. These data highlight the need for appropriate patient counseling and the need for further investigation into the effects of preoperative and postoperative optimization of lymphedema management in the TKA setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

Cancer-related lymphedema: clinical pearls for providers

Lymphedema is a chronic inflammatory condition that results from damage to the lymphatic system. Lymphedema is classified as either primary or secondary, the former being caused by a malformation of lymph vessels or nodes, and the latter resulting from trauma, chronic lymphatic system overload, or the sequelae of cancer treatments. In the present article, we focus on secondary cancer-related lymphedema (crl), a potential survivorship treatment-related effect. Treatments for breast, gynecologic, prostate, and head-and-neck cancers, and melanoma and other skin cancers are most frequently associated with crl. The incidence of crl varies widely based on cancer location and treatment modalities, with estimates ranging from 5% to 83% in various cancers. Given the lack of a universal definition and diagnostic criteria, the prevalence of crl is difficult to ascertain; current estimates suggest that more than 300,000 Canadians are affected by crl. Here, we present an overview of crl, divided into 5 subtopics: lymphedema risk factors; early identification and intervention; diagnosis and staging; management, with emphasis on the volume reduction and maintenance phases, plus patient support and education; and clinical pearls to help providers integrate knowledge about crl into their practice.

Comparison of Vectra three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry measurement and tape measurement in the evaluation of perioperative volume change of the lower abdomen in association with lymphatic microsurgery

BACKGROUND

Although microsurgical treatment for lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) can improve lower abdominal morphology, methods to evaluate the volume change of the lower abdomen have yet to be established. This study aimed to determine the accuracy and reproducibility of three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry (3DSM) in measuring the volume change in the lower abdomen.

METHODS

The perioperative volume changes in the lower abdomen were estimated using tape measurement (TM) and 3DSM in 26 patients with LEL. Thirteen patients with suprapubic lymphedema underwent abdominoplasty simultaneously. Each of them underwent multiple lymphaticovenular anastomoses (LVAs), and five of them underwent vascularized lymph node transfer, simultaneously. Thirteen patients with pelvic lymphatic fluid underwent multiple LVAs. Two patients underwent this surgery twice. When assessed on the Internal Society of Lymphology scale, eight patients were Stage I, 10 patients were Stage II, four patients were late Stage II, and four patients were Stage III. The difference between the two measurement methods and reproducibility of each method were analyzed.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up period of 6 months, all patients had no postoperative complications and their chief complaint improved. The calculated reduction volume between TM and 3DSM showed a high correlation (p < .0001, r = .84). The reduction volume based on TM was significantly larger than 3DSM (991.1 ± 460.3 ml vs. 862.3 ± 333.5 ml, p = .02). The interrater ICC was 0.94 and 0.98 based on TM and 3DSM, respectively.

CONCLUSION

3DSM may be a useful method for assessment of the lower abdominal morphology due to its high accuracy and reproducibility.

Usefulness of computed tomography venography in gynecologic cancer patients with lower extremity edema

Lower extremity (LEx) edema is a common complication in gynecologic cancer patients. There are 2 main causes of edema in these patients such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and lymphedema. Early diagnosis and treatment of DVT are certainly important, but it is often difficult to evaluate proximal DVT by using ultrasound. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the usefulness of computed tomography venography of the lower extremity (CTV LEx) for the diagnosis of the DVT and investigate predictive factor of DVT in gynecologic cancer patients with LEx edema.The medical records of 415 gynecologic cancer patients who were referred to the department of rehabilitation medicine with LEx edema were retrospectively reviewed in this case-controlled study. We categorized CTV LEx findings as follows: DVT proximal to the inguinal ligament (inferior vena cava or iliac vein thrombosis) and DVT distal to the inguinal ligament (femoral, popliteal, or calf vein thrombosis). We also evaluated patient characteristics including D-dimer level. We analyzed the correlation of each factor with DVT frequency and used receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine the appropriate D-dimer threshold.Sixty-six patients were diagnosed with DVT; of them, 35 (53%) had DVT proximal to the inguinal ligament. Twenty-two patients were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism, of whom 15 had proximal DVT. Patients with proximal DVT tended to have pulmonary embolism (P < .001). Distal organ metastasis (odds ratio [OR], 2.88; P = .002) and a high D-dimer level (OR, 1.13; P = .001) were correlated with DVT.CTV LEx is a useful diagnostic tool for gynecologic cancer patients with LEx edema, particularly high-risk patients, that should be performed at the initial evaluation.

Is the Effect of Complex Decongestive Therapy the Same for Primary and Secondary Lower Lymphedema?

Background: The aim was to compare edema and quality of life (QOL) after complex decongestive therapy (CDT) in two types of lymphedema: primary lower limb lymphedema (PLL) and secondary lower limb lymphedema (SLL). Methods and Results: Participants with PLL (n = 20) and SLL (n = 20) were recruited in this prospective single-blinded study. Patients in both groups were treated with CDT for 4 weeks 5 days a week. The amount of edema in their lower extremities was assessed by circumference measurement. The QOL for the patients was evaluated by a Lymphedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire for Lower Limb Lymphedema (Lymph-ICF-LL) before and immediately following the therapy. There was no significant difference in the volume reductions between the two groups (p > 0.05). Overall initial QOL was significantly lower in patients with PLL than in patients with SLL scores. Post-CDT differed significantly between PLL and SLL groups, QOL was significantly lower for patients with PLL than for patients with SLL scores (p < 0.05). When the changes in both groups were examined, it was found that their QOL increased after the treatment (p < 0.05). Conclusions: While there was no difference in the amount of edema in both groups, the results of patients with SLL were more positive than patients with PLL in terms of QOL. Lymphedema therapists should approach patients with different therapeutic considerations specific to each type of lymphedema before using CDT in clinical practice.

Comprehensive Decongestive Therapy as a Treatment for Secondary Lymphedema of the Lower Extremity and Quality of Life of Women After Gynecological Cancer Surgery

Background

Lymphedema is a clinical manifestation of lymphatic system failure, caused by an imbalance between the transport capacity of the lymphatic system and the volume of the produced lymph. Lymphedema is complication and significantly worsens quality of life (QoL).

Material/Methods

There were 50 patients diagnosed with secondary lymphedema of the lower extremities after gynecological cancer followed by radiotherapy included in this study. The average age was 57.76 years (standard deviation±10.08). Patients were treated at the Department of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Medical Rehabilitation, in hospital NsP in Bardejov. During therapy, we applied manual lymphatic drainage, instrumental lymphatic drainage, multilayer bandage, vascular gymnastics (with loaded external compression), hydrotherapy, and patient education on the adjustment necessary for a life-long regimen. The circumference of the limb was measured using the Kuhnkes disk method, QoL was assessed using the LYMQOL LEG questionnaire, and for assessment of pain the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used.

Results

After treatment, we found a reduction in lymphedema (P<0.001), an increase in QoL (P<0.001), and a reduction in pain (P<0.001). We found a significant relationship between QoL change and pain in the domains of symptoms, function, and overall QoL (P<0.005). The results showed that reduction of lymphedema was not a significant predictor of QoL (P>0.001).

Conclusions

We found a positive effect in the treatment of secondary lymphedema of the lower extremity on the QoL of women after uterine cancer surgery, and also found that reduction of lymphedema and age were not predictors of improvement in QoL.

Comparing the experience of individuals with primary and secondary lymphoedema: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Lymphoedema is a chronic condition that has significant detrimental impact on patients' quality of life. Secondary lymphoedema often results from anti-tumour treatment, in contrast to primary lymphoedema which is the result of genetic abnormalities that leads to an abnormal development of the lymphatic system.

OBJECTIVE

To describe and compare the experience of individuals with primary and secondary lymphoedema.

METHODS

A total of 19 patients (mean ± standard deviation age: 56.7 ± 16.2 years), 8 with primary and 11 with secondary lymphoedema, participated in this qualitative phenomenological study. Purposeful sampling method was applied. We recruited participants from specialised lymphoedema units of two physical therapy clinics and the Lymphoedema Patient Association in Spain. Data collection methods included unstructured and semi-structured interviews. An inductive thematic analysis was used.

RESULTS

The findings suggest differences between the experience of living with primary or secondary lymphoedema. Also, those with lower extremity lymphoedema have more pain, fatigue, and functional limitations. Three primary themes emerged: "Emotional challenge", "Adapting your life to a new situation," and "lymphoedema management".

CONCLUSIONS

The experience of living with lymphoedema involves aspects of fear, suffering, coping, and management of the disease and differs between secondary and primary causes. However, it seems to be more dependent on its location than its cause.

Lipoaspiration for the Treatment of Lower Limb Lymphedema: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Lipoaspiration is a potential treatment for lymphedema; however, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the outcomes and benefits of this procedure in lower limb lymphedema. We aim to describe the outcomes of studies to date reporting the use of lipoaspiration in lower limb lymphedema. We searched the PubMed database for studies that evaluated the use of lipoaspiration for lower limb lymphedema. The keywords “lipoaspiration” AND “lymphedema,” synonyms, and different combinations were used for the search. Only English studies were included. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria from a total of 129 articles. A volume reduction greater than 50% was found in all patients who underwent lipoaspiration for lower limb lymphedema. Complete volume reduction was found after four to five years of follow-up. A greater volume reduction was found for secondary lymphedema when compared to primary lymphedema. Finally, improvement was found in functionality, quality of life, and rate of infection. Lipoaspiration is recommended for patients with lower limb lymphedema in stages 2 and 3 of the disease, followed by controlled compressive therapy that maintains the volume reduction accomplished by the procedure.

Ultrasound Elastography Use in Lower Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) is mainly assessed clinically. Ultrasound elastography (UE) is a promising imaging tool to assess this disorder. We conducted a systematic literature review to describe the studies evaluating the use of UE in LEL. The PubMed database was queried for studies that evaluated the use of UE in LEL. The keywords "elastography" AND "lymphedema" were used for the search. Original articles in English were included in our study, whereas reviews were excluded. Our search resulted in 12 articles, 4 of which met the inclusion criteria. UE methods included free-hand real-time tissue elastography and UE with transducer in B mode. The imaging parameters applied were the tissue strains and the area of red region, respectively. All studies tested UE use in the assessment of LEL, and only one considered its use for staging. All studies but one found a difference in strain parameters for assessment of patients with LEL. Our systematic review has shown that UE appears to be a great tool in the assessment of LEL in moderate-to-advanced stages of disease. However, further studies using new effective methods are needed to evaluate patients with early lymphedema.

Lymphaticovenular anastomosis and venous arterialization in coexisting Raynaud's phenomenon and lymphedema: A case report

Raynaud's phenomenon is highly prevalent in the general population. The optimal medical management for patients with severe Raynaud's phenomenon remains unclear. Venous arterialization (VA) may be considered as a salvage procedure when no distal vessels are available for vascular reconstruction. Surgical treatments for lymphedema, including lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA), are becoming popular alternatives to conservative therapy. Here, we report on a patient with comorbid primary Raynaud's phenomenon and lymphedema in whom both VA and LVA were performed. The patient was a 60-year-old woman with an edematous right upper limb and pain and cold sensitivity in the middle, ring, and small fingers that was refractory to medication. Indocyanine green lymphography and computed tomography angiography suggested coexistence of lymphedema and primary Raynaud's phenomenon. VA and LVA were performed to reduce the risks of cellulitis and amputation. Computed tomography angiography was performed regularly after surgery to examine the arterialized venous system and Doppler echography to search for developing branches. Five months later, three branches of the arterialized veins that flowed proximally at the level of the hand and wrist were ligated. By around 1 year after surgery, the lymphedema index in the affected upper limb had improved from 116 to 103 and the patient's numerical rating scale score for intractable pain and cold sensitivity had improved from 6-7 to 1-2. We believe that the combination of VA and LVA in the early stages of primary Raynaud's phenomenon and lymphedema was effective in this case.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know When Caring for Patients with Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer incidence has been increasing over the last two decades, likely due to the obesity epidemic. The majority of these cancers are confined to the uterus at diagnosis and can be cured with surgery. Overall, five-year disease-specific survival is about 80%, but some patients have locally advanced or metastatic disease that is not amenable to control with radiation and/or chemotherapy. Disease-related symptoms are most common in this subset of patients with endometrial cancer, although women with early-stage disease may also experience side effects related to surgical menopause or adjuvant treatment. In recent years, professional societies have been increasingly vocal about the importance of incorporating palliative care early in a patient's disease course. As these calls increase, palliative care clinicians will likely increasingly comanage patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. We brought together a team of gynecologic oncology and palliative care experts to assemble practical tips for the care of women with endometrial cancer. In this article, we use a "Top 10" format to highlight issues that may help palliative care physicians understand a patient's prognosis, address common misconceptions about endometrial cancer, and improve the quality of shared decision making and goals of care discussions.

Comparison of the effectiveness of complex decongestive therapy and compression bandaging as a method of treatment of lymphedema in the elderly

Background

Lymphedema is a chronic condition which significantly lowers the quality of patient life, particularly among elderly populations, whose mobility and physical function are often reduced.

Objectives

The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of multi-layer compression bandaging (MCB) and complex decongestive therapy (CDT), and to show that MCB is a cheaper, more accessible and less labor intensive method of treating lymphedema in elderly patients.

Patients and methods

The study included 103 patients (85 women and 18 men) aged ≥60 years, with unilateral lower limb lymphedema. The subjects were divided into two groups: 50 treated with CDT and 53 with MCB. Pre- and post-treatment BMI, and average and maximum circumference of the edematous extremities were analyzed.

Results

Reduction in swelling in both groups was achieved after 15 interventions. Both therapies demonstrated similar efficacy in reducing limb volume and circumference, but MCB showed greater efficacy in reducing the maximum circumference.

Conclusion

Compression bandaging is a vital component of CDT. Maximum lymphedema reduction during therapy and maintaining its effect cannot be achieved without it. It also demonstrates its effectiveness as an independent method, which can reduce therapy cost and accessibility.