Open and Endovascular Repair of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms

A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment and natural history of popliteal artery aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the best available evidence comparing open vs endovascular popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) repair. We also summarized the natural history of PAAs to support of the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and Scopus for studies of patients with PAAs treated with an open vs an endovascular approach. We also included studies of natural history of untreated patients. Studies were selected and appraised by pairs of independent reviewers. A meta-analysis was performed when appropriate.

RESULTS

We identified 32 original studies and 4 systematic reviews from 2191 candidate references. Meta-analysis showed that compared with the endovascular approach, open surgical repair was associated with higher primary patency at 1 year (odds ratio [OR], 2.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-3.12), lower occlusion rate at 30 days (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24-0.68) and fewer reinterventions (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17-0.45), but a longer hospital stay (standardized mean difference, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.23-3.09) and more wound complications (OR, 5.18; 95% CI, 2.19-12.26). There was no statistically significant difference in primary patency at 3 years (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.97-1.97), secondary patency (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.84-3.03), mortality at the longest follow-up (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.21-1.17), mortality at 30 days (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.06-1.36), or amputation (incidence rate ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.56-1.31). The certainty in these estimates was, in general, low. Studies of PAA natural history suggest that thromboembolic complications and amputation develop at a mean observation time of 18 months and they are frequent. One study showed that at 5 years, approximately one-half of the patients had complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review provides event rates for outcomes important to patients with PAAs. Despite the low certainty of the evidence, these rates along with surgical expertise and anatomic feasibility can help patients and surgeons to engage in shared decision-making.

Poor runoff and distal coverage below the knee are associated with poor long-term outcomes following endovascular popliteal aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

Reports of good short-term outcomes for endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysms have led to an increased use of the technique. However, data are lacking on long-term limb-related outcomes and factors associated with the failure of endovascular repair.

METHODS

All patients who underwent endovascular popliteal aneurysm repair (EPAR) at a single institution from January 2006 to December 2018 were included in the study. Demographics, indications, anatomic and operative details, and outcomes were reviewed. Long-term patency, major adverse limb event-free survival (MALE-FS) and graft loss/occlusion were analyzed with multivariable cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

We included 117 limbs from 101 patients with a mean follow-up of 55.6 months (range, 0.43-158 months). The average age was 73 ± 9.3 years. Thirty-two patients (29.1%) were symptomatic (claudication, rest pain, tissue loss, or rupture). The stent grafts crossed the knee joint in 91.4% of cases. In all, 36.8% of procedures used one stent graft, 41.0% used two stent grafts, and 22.2% of procedures used more than two stent grafts. The median arterial length covered was 100 mm, with an average length of stent overlap of 25 mm. Tapered configurations were used in 43.8% of cases. The majority of limbs (62.8%) had a three-vessel runoff, 20.2% had a two-vessel runoff, and 17% has a one-vessel runoff. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of graft occlusion at 1 and 3 years were 6.3% and 16.2%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year primary patency rates were 88.2% and 72.6%, and the 1- and 3-year major adverse limb event-free survival (MALE-FS) rates were 82% and 57.4%. The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 92.9% and 76.2%, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression, aneurysm size, one-vessel runoff, and coverage below the knee were associated with a lower 3-year MALE-FS. Coverage below the knee was also associated with a lower 3-year MALE-FS. Other anatomic or technical details were not associated with limb-related events or patency.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the largest single center analysis to describe the predictors of poor outcomes after EPAR. EPAR is a safe and effective way to treat popliteal artery aneurysms. Factors associated with poor MALE-FS after EPAR include single-vessel tibial runoff and coverage below the knee.

Open Endoaneurysmorrhaphy of 9-cm Ruptured Popliteal Aneurysm 7 Years after Initial Repair

BACKGROUND

A previously repaired right popliteal artery aneurysm via a medial approach with proximal and distal ligation and interval bypass re-presented 7 years after the initial repair with a ruptured 9 × 25.5 cm right popliteal aneurysm.

METHODS

Surgical repair was complex due to the large size of the aneurysm. Technique and management of popliteal aneurysm repair are discussed, along with a review of the current literature.

RESULTS

A 58-year-old male with a 3.5 cm popliteal artery aneurysm was initially treated with end-to-end prosthetic bypass and proximal/distal aneurysm ligation from a medial-approach without complication. Seven years later, he presented with a 9-cm popliteal aneurysm rupture. Posterior approach endoaneurysmorrhaphy repair was far more complicated than expected with massive blood loss. Despite this, he was discharged without complication POD #5, but on POD #19 presented with cellulitis and underwent incision and drainage of retained hematoma with cultures positive for Strep dysgalactiae. With appropriate treatment, he was healed in 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical repair of large popliteal aneurysms can be challenging, but continued aneurysmal degeneration is a potential consequence if the sac continues to be pressurized from patent geniculate arteries. Surgical repair of large popliteal artery aneurysms is complex and requires adjunctive techniques to maximize success. A posterior approach is described and the literature reviewed to support recommendations for primary popliteal artery aneurysm repair and repair of large degenerated popliteal artery aneurysms. We recommend primary popliteal artery aneurysm repair from a posterior approach with endoaneurysmorrhaphy and an interposition bypass. For ruptured large popliteal artery aneurysms, there is a high risk of hemorrhage and wound complications. Therefore, we recommend the use of a tourniquet, surgical drain and to consider the collection of intraoperative cultures to guide potential antibiotic management.

Hybrid Approach to Popliteal Artery Aneurysm with Thromboembolic Symptoms. A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

The treatment of patients with thromboembolic symptoms due to a popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) is still controversial with poor results in terms of primary patency. The aim of our pilot study was to evaluate whether improving the outflow with an endovascular pretreatment consisting in thromboaspiration and angioplasty could positively ameliorate the primary patency of the subsequent femoropopliteal (FP) bypass in symptomatic patients with at least one below the knee (BTK) patent vessel.

METHODS

This is a single-center pilot case-control study that involves patients treated at the Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit of Udine, Italy, from January 2015 to November 2019. The inclusion criteria were the presence of thromboembolic symptoms due to PAA distal embolization, associated with the presence of a patent PAA >20 mm and a poor runoff (no more than one patent BTK artery). The case group was treated in a two-step approach: the first step consisted in thromboaspiration followed by BTK angioplasty, when appropriate, and the second one consisted in performing the surgical FP bypass. The control group moved on directly to the open surgical intervention.

RESULTS

The case group was composed of 11 patients, 10 males and 1 female, with a mean age of 69.3 ± 10.8 years. The mean PAA dimension was 32.6 ± 9.9 mm. Particularly, 9 patients were operated on through the medial vascular approach and 2 through the posterior one. The grafts used were 10 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and 1 great saphenous vein (GSV) in situ. The control group was composed of 11 male patients with a mean age of 75.5 ± 8.7 years, and the mean PAA dimension was 29.8 ± 13.4 mm. All the FP bypasses were approached medially, and the materials used were 10 PTFE and 1 reversed GSV. The median follow-up was 31.5 ± 12.6 months. Primary patency in the case group was 72.7% within one year; on the contrary, it was 27.3% in the control group. The amputation rate was 0% in the case group, 27.3% in the controls. By comparing the 2 groups, we found a higher and significant risk (P = 0.0261) of early FP bypass occlusion and major limb amputation in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study shows encouraging results; the endovascular approach is a safe and repeatable procedure which, improving the runoff in thromboembolic symptomatic PAA, seems to guarantee a better FP graft primary patency.

Ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm in a patient with a clinical diagnosis of Marfan syndrome

The popliteal artery is the main site of occurrence of peripheral aneurysms. Acute presentations constitute a potential threat to limb viability and to life, especially in the event of rupture. Rupture is a rare event, but one that demands an immediate intervention decision to achieve a satisfactory treatment outcome. The gold standard treatment is conventional surgery, effecting repair by interposition of a great saphenous vein graft. Studies conducted in recent decades have found associations between Marfan Syndrome and peripheral aneurysms. This report presents a case of a ruptured left popliteal artery aneurysm successfully treated in an 82-year-old patient clinically diagnosed with previously unknown Marfan syndrome.

A Comparison of Endovascular Versus Open Repair of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms: An Updated Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Traditionally, popliteal artery aneurysms (PPAs) were treated via open repair (OR). However, more recently endovascular repair (EVR) approaches have become more common for the treatment of PPAs. The present meta-analysis therefore sought to conduct an up-to-date review of studies comparing the relative safety and efficacy of these 2 repair strategies. To that end, patient outcomes including primary patency, operating time, hospital stay duration, and re-intervention, amputation, and graft occlusion within 30 days were compared for these OR and EVR approaches.

METHODS

Studies in which OR and EVR were compared as treatments for PPAs were identified through systematic searching of the PubMed and Embase databases. Any studies either analyzing only one of these treatments in isolation or analyzing <5 patients were not included in this analysis. For all relevant studies, patient demographic information and outcome details were compiled. Risk of bias was analyzed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The odds ratios, mean differences, and hazard ratios (HRs) for patient outcomes were estimated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

In total, we identified 17 relevant studies including a single randomized controlled trial and 16 retrospective cohort studies, incorporating 6887 total cases (1662 EVR and 5225 OR). The quality of evidence for all measured outcomes was deemed to be very low or low according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Rates of primary patency were found to be significantly higher for patients treated via OR relative to those treated via EVR (HR = 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-2.30; P = .03). Operative and hospitalization durations, in contrast, were significantly lower for patients treated via EVR. Patients treated via EVR also experienced significantly higher rates of graft thrombosis and reintervention within 30 days relative to patients treated via OR. However, no significant differences were observed between treatments with respect to rates of patient amputation (OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.55-1.85; P = .98).

CONCLUSIONS

The available data suggest that PPA repair via EVR is a safe alternative to OR, but that short-term graft thrombosis and reintervention rates are significantly greater for the former approach. Moreover, few studies to date have compared these techniques and those that were largely retrospective in nature with relatively low-quality evidence, making it difficult to make definitive statements regarding the relative safety and efficacy of these 2 repair strategies. Additional population-based large-scale studies are therefore essential in order to conduct a robust evaluation of the safety and utility of EVR as an alternative to OR for PPA repair.

Acute Limb Ischemia in a 26-Year-Old Man Presenting with an Idiopathic Thrombosed Popliteal Artery Aneurysm

Popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) are the most common peripheral arterial aneurysms and develop almost exclusively (>90%) in men who have a history of tobacco abuse at an average age of 65 years. Most PAAs are caused by chronic inflammation secondary to atherosclerotic disease; other nondegenerative causes of PAAs include arterial trauma, infection, Behçet's disease, medial fibromuscular dysplasia, or popliteal artery entrapment. Few case reports have been published on idiopathic congenital PAAs. We report a case of a 26-year-old man who presented with progressive claudication and subsequent acute limb ischemia due to the thrombosis of a large idiopathic PAA. Our case demonstrates that the differential diagnosis of young adult or pediatric patients presenting with signs of acute limb ischemia or claudication should include a symptomatic PAA.