Endovascular Embolization Techniques in a Novel Swine Model of Fatal Uncontrolled Solid Organ Hemorrhage and Coagulopathy

The Use of Large Animal Models in Trauma and Bleeding Studies

BACKGROUND

 Major trauma often results in significant bleeding and coagulopathy, posing a substantial clinical burden. To understand the underlying pathophysiology and to refine clinical strategies to overcome coagulopathy, preclinical large animal models are often used. This review scrutinizes the clinical relevance of large animal models in hemostasis research, emphasizing challenges in translating findings into clinical therapies.

METHODS

 We conducted a thorough search of PubMed and EMBASE databases from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2022. We used specific keywords and inclusion/exclusion criteria centered on large animal models.

RESULTS

 Our review analyzed 84 pertinent articles, including four animal species: pigs, sheep, dogs, and nonhuman primates (NHPs). Eighty-five percent of the studies predominantly utilized porcine models. Meanwhile, sheep and dogs were less represented, making up only 2.5% of the total studies. Models with NHP were 10%. The most frequently used trauma models involved a combination of liver injury and femur fractures (eight studies), arterial hemorrhage (seven studies), and a combination of hemodilution and liver injury (seven studies). A wide array of coagulation parameters were employed to assess the efficacy of interventions in hemostasis and bleeding control.

CONCLUSIONS

 Recognizing the diverse strengths and weaknesses of large animal models is critical for trauma and hemorrhage research. Each model is unique and should be chosen based on how well it aligns with the specific scientific objectives of the study. By strategically considering each model's advantages and limitations, we can enhance our understanding of trauma and hemorrhage pathophysiology and further advance the development of effective treatments.

Material characterization of GPX®: A versatile in situ solidifying embolic platform technology

Endovascular embolization is a minimally invasive procedure during which blood flow to targeted tissues is selectively occluded. The list of clinical indications for embolization continues to expand. Liquid embolic agents are injectable compositions that transition into a solid or semi-solid form when introduced into blood vessels. The mechanism that triggers the liquid-to-solid transition is a key distinguishing feature of liquid embolic agents. GPX is a waterborne liquid embolic agent comprising oppositely charged polyelectrolytes: polyguanidinum and inorganic polyphoshate. In situ solidification is driven by electrostatic condensation of the polyelectrolytes, triggered by ionic strength differentials. We report in vitro characterization of the material properties of GPX, it is in vivo effectiveness in acute animal studies, and its potential for chemoembolization. The viscosity of GPX can be varied over a wide range by adjusting the polyguanidinium MW and/or concentration. Formulation of GPX with either tantalum microparticles (30 wt%) or iodinated radiocontrast agents (300 mgI ml^-1) did not significantly change the flow behavior of GPX; the viscosity was independent of shear rate and remained within a clinically practical range (80-160 cP). Formulation of GPX with doxorubicin substantially increased viscosity at low shear rates and resulted in a power law dependence on shear rate. High contrast and effective vascular occlusion were demonstrated in both swine kidneys and rete mirabile. Contrast from iodinated compounds was temporary, dissipating within hours. The doxorubicin in vitro release profile was linear over 90 days. The results demonstrate that GPX is a versatile liquid embolic platform that can be formulated with a wide range of viscosities injectable at clinically practical flow rates, with either transient or permanent contrast, and that can provide prolonged zero-order delivery of doxorubicin to embolized tissues.

Evaluation of a novel hydrogel intravascular embolization agent in a swine model of fatal uncontrolled solid organ hemorrhage and coagulopathy

Introduction

Current agents for the intravascular embolization of traumatic hemorrhage are used off-label and have been minimally studied with respect to their performance under differing coagulation conditions. We studied the hemorrhage control efficacy of a novel, liquid, polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel delivered as two liquid precursors that polymerize within the target vessel in a unique animal model of severe solid organ injury with and without dilutional coagulopathy.

Methods

Anesthetized swine (n = 36, 45 ± 3 kg) had laparotomy and splenic externalization. Half underwent 50% isovolemic hemodilution with 6% hetastarch and cooling to 33°C-35°C (coagulopathic group). All animals had controlled 20 mL/kg hemorrhage and endovascular proximal splenic artery access with a 4F catheter via a right femoral sheath. Splenic transection and 5-minute free bleeding were followed by treatment (n = 5/group) with 5 mL of gelfoam slurry, three 6-mm coils, up to 6 mL of hydrogel, or no treatment (n = 3, control). Animals received 15 mL/kg plasma and were monitored for 6 hours with continuous blood loss measurement.

Results

Coagulopathy was successfully established, with coagulopathic animals having greater pretreatment blood loss and earlier mean time to death regardless of the treatment group. All control animals died within 100 minutes. Overall survival without coagulopathy was 5/5 for hydrogel, 4/5 for coil, and 3/5 for gelfoam. With coagulopathy, one hydrogel animal survived to the end of the experiment, with 2/4 hydrogel deaths occurring in the final hour of observation. In noncoagulopathic animals, hydrogel demonstrated improved survival time (P < .01) and post-treatment blood loss (1.46 ± 0.8 mL/kg) over controls (18.8 ± 0.7, P = .001), gelfoam (4.7 ± 1.3, P > .05), and coils (4.6 ± 1.5, P > .05). In coagulopathic animals, hydrogel had improved survival time (P = .003) and decreased blood loss (4.2 ± 0.8 mL/kg) compared with control (20.4 ± 4.2, P = .003).

Conclusions

The hydrogel demonstrated equivalent hemorrhage control performance to standard treatments under noncoagulopathic conditions and improved performance in the face of dilutional coagulopathy. This agent should be explored as a potential preferable treatment for the embolization of traumatic solid organ and other injuries. (JVS–Vascular Science 2021;2:43-51.)

Clinical Relevance

In a translational model of severe solid organ injury hemorrhage with and without coagulopathy, a novel hydrogel transarterial embolization agent demonstrated equivalent hemorrhage control performance to standard agents under noncoagulopathic conditions and improved performance in the face of dilutional coagulopathy. This agent represents a promising future treatment for the embolization of traumatic solid organ and other injuries.