Feasibility of Photo-Optical Transcutaneous Oxygen Tension Measurement During Revascularization of the Lower Extremity

Endovascular Denervation for the Improvement of Limb Ischemia in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular denervation (EDN) as an adjunct to percutaneous vascular intervention (PVI) for peripheral artery disease (PAD).

METHODS

From August 2019 to April 2021, 38 eligible patients with PAD enrolled in this study were randomly and equally assigned into 2 groups: the PVI group and the PVI + EDN group treated with EDN at the iliac and femoral arteries before PVI. The primary endpoint was the improvement in the ankle brachial index at 6 months after the procedure. The secondary endpoints were transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2), Rutherford category, numerical rating scale score, and safety.

RESULTS

The technical success rates of PVI and EDN were 100%, and no device-related or procedure-related major adverse events occurred in either group. Compared with PVI alone, PVI + EDN demonstrated a significant improvement in limb hemodynamics at 6 months (Δ ankle brachial index 0.44 ± 0.31 vs. 0.24 ± 0.15, P = 0.018). Microcirculatory perfusion of PAD was significantly better at 6 months in the PVI + EDN group (ΔTcPO2, 15.68 ± 16.72 vs. 4.95 ± 13.43, P = 0.036). The Rutherford category was significantly improved in the PVI + EDN group in comparison with the PVI group at the 3-month follow-up (100.00% vs. 68.42%, P = 0.02). The decrease in the numerical rating scale score in the PVI + EDN group was greater than that in the PVI group at 1 week following the procedure (3 [2-5] vs. 4 [4-6], P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center pilot analysis of a heterogeneous cohort of patients with PAD, PVI with EDN demonstrated a significant improvement in limb ischemia at 6 months compared with PVI alone.

Assessments of microvascular function in organ systems

Microvascular disease plays critical roles in the dysfunction of all organ systems, and there are many methods available to assess the microvasculature. These methods can either assess the target organ directly or assess an easily accessible organ such as the skin or retina so that inferences can be extrapolated to the other systems and/or related diseases. Despite the abundance of exploratory research on some of these modalities and their possible applications, there is a general lack of clinical use. This deficiency is likely due to two main reasons: the need for standardization of protocols to establish a role in clinical practice or the lack of therapies targeted toward microvascular dysfunction. Also, there remain some questions to be answered about the coronary microvasculature, as it is complex, heterogeneous, and difficult to visualize in vivo even with advanced imaging technology. This review will discuss novel approaches that are being used to assess microvasculature health in several key organ systems, and evaluate their clinical utility and scope for further development.