Effects of Peripheral Arterial Disease Interventions on Survival: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis Using VQI Data

Atherectomy - The Options, the Evidence, and When Should It Be Used

The use of atherectomy for peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) has increased exponentially and reached 18% of all PVI in the United States. The theoretical benefit on extensive arterial calcification relies on the concept of plaque modification and removal instead of displacement, as with other endovascular techniques. To date, there are no prospective studies comparing the different atherectomy technologies (directional, rotational, orbital, and laser). Moreover, most related prospective comparative studies have a small number of patients, and larger studies are single arm in patients with relatively mild to moderate disease burden. While available literature shows lower dissection risk and reduced bailout stenting, the superiority of this technology compared to other endovascular techniques has yet to be proven. Despite the lack of level 1 evidence to support its superiority, the lucrative reimbursement fueled the overuse of this technology as first-line therapy, particularly in office-based laboratories and ambulatory surgery centers. The use of atherectomy ought to be selective and complementary to other endovascular technologies, and individualized patient-level decision-making based on the practitioner's preference and expertise is essential to selectively incorporate atherectomy in managing complex atherosclerotic lesions.

Comparison of endovascular therapies for chronic limb-threatening ischemia and claudication

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of regional data from the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) suggested improved survival for patients undergoing stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty and atherectomy. Using national data from the VQI linked to Medicare claims data through the Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network program, this study aimed to compare the rates of mortality, reintervention, and amputation after endovascular interventions (atherectomy, stenting, and balloon angioplasty) for two separate cohorts: patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and patients with claudication.

METHODS

This was a secondary data analysis of Society for Vascular Surgery National VQI data linked to Medicare claims, between October 2016 and December 2019. Patients aged ≥65 years with symptoms of claudication or CLTI and a diagnosis of occlusive disease were included. Urgent or emergent interventions or those with concurrent procedures (endarterectomy, bypass, or bilateral intervention) were excluded. Interventions were grouped into (1) balloon angioplasty only; (2) stent (with or without balloon angioplasty); or (3) atherectomy (alone, with or without stent, with or without balloon angioplasty). Propensity score-matched cohorts were constructed to conduct pairwise intervention comparisons of mortality, reintervention, and amputation rates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to derive propensity scores for each patient. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 9785 (2665 claudication, 7120 CLTI) eligible patients were identified. After propensity score matching for the CLTI group, 2826, 3608, and 2796 pairs of cases were used to compare balloon angioplasty vs atherectomy, balloon angioplasty vs stent, and stent vs atherectomy, respectively. No statistically significant difference in mortality was observed among all interventions. However, atherectomy was associated with a significant increase in reintervention rate compared with balloon angioplasty (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.39; P = .01) and compared with stenting (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.10-1.46; P < .01) within the first year after the index procedure. Of note, both atherectomy (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.98; P < .05) and stenting (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.90; P < .01) showed lower rates of major amputation when compared with balloon angioplasty within 1 year after the index procedure. In the claudication group, there were no significant differences observed among interventions for peripheral arterial disease for mortality, reintervention, or amputation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are needed to identify appropriate indications for atherectomy, because there may be a subset of patients with CLTI who benefit from this therapy with respect to amputation rates. Until then, caution should be exercised when using atherectomy because it is also associated with higher reintervention rates.

Increased Regional Market Competition is Associated with a Lower Threshold for Revascularization in Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Revascularization practices with respect to asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACAS) are known to vary widely among proceduralists. In addition, regional market competition has been previously shown to drive more aggressive practices in a number of surgical procedures. The aim of our study was to examine the association of regional market competition with revascularization thresholds for ACAS.

METHODS

All patients undergoing carotid revascularization in the Vascular Quality Initiative carotid endarterectomy and stenting databases (2016-2020) were included. High-grade carotid stenosis was defined as ≥80%. We calculated the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI; a measure of physician market competition) for each U.S region as defined by the U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Logistic regression was used to examine the association of degree of carotid stenosis at revascularization with HHI stratified by symptomatology, adjusting for age, sex, race, insurance, and revascularization modality.

RESULTS

Of 92,243 carotid interventions, 57,094 (61.9%) were performed for ACAS and 35,149 (38.1%) were performed for symptomatic carotid stenosis (SCAS). ACAS patients undergoing revascularization for moderate-grade stenosis were significantly less likely to be aspirin (85.6% vs. 86.3%), clopidogrel (41.3% vs. 45.1%), dual anti-platelet therapy (35.9% vs. 39.2%) and systemic anticoagulants (10.9 vs. 11.7%) compared to high-grade stenosis (all P < 0.05). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that decreased local market competition was independently associated with a lower odds of revascularization for moderate versus high-grade ACAS (odds ratio OR: 0.99 per 10 point increase in HHI, 95% confidence interval CI: 0.98-0.99). There was no association of local market competition with degree of carotid stenosis at time of revascularization among patients with SCAS (OR: 1.00 per 10 point increase in HHI, 95% CI: 0.99-1.00). Among ACAS patients, patients with moderate-grade stenosis had a higher odds ratio of in-hospital stroke or death compared to patients with high-grade stenosis (OR: 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.45). This association was not redemonstrated in the SCAS group (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.80-1.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased local market competition is associated with a lower threshold for revascularization of ACAS. There is no association between regional market competition and revascularization threshold for SCAS. These findings, combined with the significantly increased risk of perioperative stroke/death among moderate-grade ACAS patients, suggest that competition among proceduralists may result in a higher tolerance for increased operative risk in patients who might otherwise be reasonable candidates for surveillance.

Index Atherectomy Peripheral Vascular Interventions Performed for Claudication are Associated with More Reinterventions than Non-Atherectomy Interventions

OBJECTIVE

Despite limited evidence supporting atherectomy alone over stenting/angioplasty as the index peripheral vascular intervention (PVI), the use of atherectomy has rapidly increased in recent years. We previously identified a wide distribution of atherectomy practice patterns among US physicians. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of index atherectomy with reintervention.

METHODS

100% Medicare fee-for-service claims were used to identify all beneficiaries who underwent elective first-time femoropopliteal peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for claudication between 1/1/2019-12/31/2019. Subsequent PVI reinterventions were examined through 6/30/2021. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the rate of PVI reinterventions for patients who received index atherectomy vs. non-atherectomy procedures. Reintervention rates were also described for physicians by their overall atherectomy use (by quartile). A hierarchical Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate patient and physician-level characteristics associated with reinterventions.

RESULTS

A total of 15,246 patients underwent index PVI for claudication in 2019, of which 59.7% were atherectomy. After a median of 603 days (IQR 77, 784) of follow-up, 41.2% of patients underwent a PVI reintervention, including 48.9% of patients who underwent index atherectomy vs. 29.8% of patients who underwent index non-atherectomy (P<0.001). Patients treated by high physician users of atherectomy (quartile 4) received more reinterventions than patients treated by standard physician users (quartiles 1-3) (56.8% vs. 39.6%, P<0.001). After adjustment, patient factors association with PVI reintervention included receipt of index atherectomy (aHR 1.33, 95% CI 1.21-1.46), Black race (vs. White, aHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.34), diabetes (aHR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.21), and urban residence (aHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.22). Physician factors associated with reintervention included male sex (aHR 1.52, 95% CI 1.12-2.04), high-volume PVI practices (aHR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10-1.37), and physicians with high use of index atherectomy (aHR 1.49, 95% CI 1.27-1.74). Vascular surgeons had a lower risk of PVI reintervention than Cardiologists (vs. Vascular, aHR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.38), Radiologists (aHR 1.55, 95% CI 1.31-1.83), and other specialties (aHR 1.59, 95% CI 1.20-2.11). Location of services delivered was not associated with reintervention (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of atherectomy as an index PVI for claudication is associated with higher PVI reintervention rates compared to non-atherectomy procedures. Similarly, high physician users of atherectomy perform more PVI reinterventions than their peers. The appropriateness of using atherectomy for initial treatment of claudication needs critical reevaluation.