A systematic review on the incidence of stent migration in the treatment of acute and chronic iliofemoral disease using dedicated venous stents

Complications of Deep Venous Stenting and Their Management

Complications after iliofemoral and inferior vena cava stenting are rare, and most can be managed effectively without significant long-term consequences for the patient. Nevertheless, the procedure is not without risk, and clinicians considering starting a venous practice must be aware of the range of complications that can occur, which range from minor access site bleeds to fatal arrhythmia from stent migration to the heart. Most complications can be avoided with appropriate patient selection, stent sizing, and careful access and deployment techniques.

Interventional treatment for post-thrombotic chronic venous obstruction: Progress and challenges

Chronic venous obstruction, including nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions and post-thrombotic syndrome, presents a significant burden on patients' quality of life and health care systems. Venous recanalization and stenting have emerged as promising minimally invasive approaches, yet challenges in patient selection, procedural techniques, and long-term outcomes persist. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the interventional treatment of post-thrombotic syndrome, focusing on the evolution of endovascular techniques and stenting. Patient selection criteria, procedural details, and the characteristics of dedicated venous stents are discussed. Particular emphasis is given to the role of inflow and other anatomical considerations, along with postoperative management protocols for an optimal long-term outcome.

Indications, technical aspects, and outcomes of stent placement in chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction

BACKGROUND

Iliofemoral venous stent placement (IVS) has evolved to a well-established endovascular treatment modality for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (CIVO). Dedicated venous stents gained approval from the US Food and Drug Administration in 2019 and solidified IVS as a defined intervention with clear indications, contraindications, risks, benefits, and procedural management principles. This review focuses on the indications, technical aspects and outcomes of stenting for CIVO. Other aspects pertaining to IVS are covered in other articles that are a part of this series.

METHODS

This study conducted a literature search limited to English articles. Three search strategies were used, and references were managed in Covidence software. Four investigators screened and evaluated articles independently, excluding meta-analyses, clinical trial protocols, and nonrelevant studies. Eligible studies, focused on clinical outcomes and stent patencies, underwent thorough review.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 1704 studies, with 147 meeting eligibility criteria after screening and evaluation. Exclusions were based on duplicates, irrelevant content, and noniliac vein stent placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful IVS for CIVO relies on meticulous patient selection, consistent use of intravascular ultrasound examination during procedures and attention to the technical details of IVS.

Review of the literature supporting international clinical practice guidelines on iliac venous stenting and their applicability to Australia and New Zealand practice

BACKGROUND

The overall goal of this report is to provide a high-level, practical approach to managing venous outflow obstruction (VOO).

METHODS

A group of vascular surgeons from Australia and New Zealand with specific interest, training, and experience in the management of VOO were surveyed to assess current local practices. The results were analyzed and areas of disagreement identified. After this, the group performed a literature review of consensus guidelines published by leading international organizations focused on the management of chronic venous disease, namely, the Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, European Society for Vascular Surgery, American Vein and Lymphatic Society, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe, and American Heart Association. These guidelines were compared against the consensus statements obtained through the surveys to determine how they relate to Australian and New Zealand practice. In addition, selected key studies, reviews, and meta-analyses on venous stenting were discussed and added to the document. A selection of statements with >75% agreement was voted on, and barriers to the guideline's applicability were identified. The final recommendations were further reviewed and endorsed by another group of venous experts.

RESULTS

The document addresses two key areas: patient selection and technical aspects of venous stenting. Regarding patient selection, patients with clinically relevant VOO, a Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Physiologic score of ≥3 or a Venous Clinical Severity Score for pain of ≥2, or both, including venous claudication, with evidence of >50% stenosis should be considered for venous stenting (Level of Recommendation Ib). Patients with chronic pelvic pain, deep dyspareunia, postcoital pain affecting their quality of life, when other causes have been ruled out, should also be considered for venous stenting (Level of Recommendation Ic). Asymptomatic patients should not be offered venous stenting (Level of Recommendation IIIc). Patients undergoing thrombus removal for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, in whom a culprit stenotic lesion of >50% has been uncovered, should be considered for venous stenting (Level of Recommendation Ib).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with VOO have been underdiagnosed and undertreated for decades; however, in recent years, interest from physicians and industry has grown substantially. International guidelines aimed at developing standards of care to avoid undertreating and overtreating patients are applicable to Australia and New Zealand practice and will serve as an educational platform for future developments.

Optimizing Venous Stenting: Consensus Recommendations for Enhanced Management of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

INTRODUCTION

 Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) poses a complex challenge and often leads to postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), a debilitating complication. The emergence of venous stents offers a potential preventive avenue against this complication. This study aimed to provide consensus recommendations on the use of venous stent for DVT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 From June to July 2023, 20 internal medicine, angiology and vascular surgery, and vascular and interventional radiology experts were involved in the Delphi process. Thirty-one recommendations, categorized into three thematic areas, were rigorously evaluated: indications for stent use, stent selection and placement, and monitoring and prevention of complications. Agreement was evaluated using a Likert scale, with consensus defined as agreement by two-thirds of the participants.

RESULTS

 Consensus was reached for 23 (74.2%) of 31 recommendations. The agreement was centered on considerations, such as stent placement in specific acute DVT scenarios, emphasizing pivotal stent characteristics. However, there were divergences in the recommended stent length to prevent migration and stent characteristics based on iliocaval bifurcation morphology. Notably, there was no consensus on whether patients with DVT caused by a major transient risk factor need more than 3 months of anticoagulation therapy or whether aspirin should be added to anticoagulant treatment after venous stenting.

CONCLUSIONS

 These consensus recommendations offer practical insights into optimizing venous stent use to prevent PTS in DVT patients. Addressing the critical aspects of stent selection, placement, and postprocedural care, these recommendations contribute to clinical decision-making. The identified divergences underscore the importance of consensus and thus indicate the need for further investigation.

One-year outcomes of a novel venous stent for symptomatic iliofemoral venous obstruction: prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

A stent with characteristics of a hybrid design may have advantages in improving the patency of symptomatic iliofemoral vein obstruction. This study assessed the safety and effectiveness of the V-Mixtent Venous Stent in treating symptomatic iliofemoral outflow obstruction.

METHODS

Eligible patients had a Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Physiologic (CEAP) C classification of ≥ 3 or a Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) pain score of ≥ 2. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of major adverse events within 30 days. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the 12-month primary patency rate. Secondary endpoints included changes in VCSS from baseline to 6 and 12 months, alterations in CEAP C classification, Chronic Venous Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (CIVIQ-14) scores at 12 months, and stent durability measures.

RESULTS

Between December 2020 and November 2021, 171 patients were enrolled across 15 institutions. A total of 185 endovenous stents were placed, with 91.81% of subjects receiving one stent and 8.19% receiving 2 stents. Within 30 days, only two major adverse events occurred (1.17%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-4.16%), below the literature-defined performance goal of 11% (P < .001). The 12-month primary patency rate (91.36%; 95% CI, 85.93-95.19%; P < .001) exceeded the literature-defined performance goal. VCSS changes from baseline demonstrated clinical improvement at 6 months (- 4.30 ± 3.66) and 12 months (- 4.98 ± 3.67) (P < .001). Significant reduction in symptoms, as measured by CEAP C classification and CIVIQ-14, was observed from pre-procedure to 12 months (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The 12-month outcomes confirm the safety and effectiveness of the V-Mixtent Venous Stent in managing symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction, including clinical symptom improvement compared to before treatment.

A meta-analysis of the medium- to long-term outcomes in patients with chronic deep venous disease treated with dedicated venous stents

OBJECTIVE

This review summarizes the safety profile, stent patency, and clinical effectiveness of dedicated venous stents for the treatment of chronic deep venous disease. The approaches to stenting and post-procedural management of different vascular units are also explored.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for pertinent literature published from January 2010 to January 2023. Outcomes related to post-stenting symptoms and health-related quality of life were described narratively. A meta analysis was conducted to evaluate stent patency, ulcer healing, bleeding, and 30-day stent thrombosis, and these outcomes were presented as proportion event rates.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were identified comprising of 2218 patients. 62.7% of individuals had post-thrombotic stenosis or occlusion. The majority of patients (78.6%) were noted to have complete occlusions of their deep veins before stenting. Eleven different dedicated venous stents were deployed. At 12 months, the primary patency rate was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 76%-90%), the primary-assisted patency rate was 90% (95% CI: 85%-96%), and the secondary patency rate was 95% (95% CI: 92%-98%). A significant improvement in health-related quality of life was demonstrated after intervention. In total, 68.8% (95% CI: 52.0%-83.7%) of ulcers healed at the last follow-up. The remaining symptomatic changes were described narratively; improvements in pain, venous claudication, and edema after stenting were observed. Seventeen deaths occurred, but none were linked to the stenting procedures. A total of 159 cases (7.2% of patients) of in-stent stenosis were observed, whereas 110 stents (5.0% of patients) were occluded. The incidence of major and minor bleeding was 1.7% (95% CI: 1.0%-2.5%) and 3.2% (95% CI: 1.3%-5.6%), respectively, more commonly seen in patients undergoing hybrid intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Deep venous stenting using dedicated venous stents is a safe technique to treat chronic deep venous stenosis and/or occlusion. Within the limitations of this study, deep venous stenting is associated with good patency rates and symptomatic improvement.

Three-Year Outcomes of the Abre Venous Self-Expanding Stent System in Patients with Symptomatic Iliofemoral Venous Outflow Obstruction

PURPOSE

To report 36-month outcomes and subgroup analysis of the ABRE study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the Abre venous self-expanding stent system for the treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction disease.

METHODS

The ABRE study was a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study that enrolled and implanted Abre venous stents in 200 participants (mean age 51.5 years [SD ± 15.9], 66.5% women) with symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction at 24 global sites. Outcomes assessed through 36 months included patency, major adverse events, stent migration, stent fracture, and quality-of-life changes. Adverse events and imaging studies were adjudicated by independent clinical events committee and core laboratories, respectively.

RESULTS

Primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency through 36 months by Kaplan-Meier estimates were 81.6%, 84.8%, and 86.3%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of major adverse events through 36 months was 10.2%, mainly driven by 12 thrombosis events. Subgroup analyses demonstrated a primary patency of 76.5% in the acute deep vein thrombosis group, 70.4% in the postthrombotic syndrome group, and 97.1% in the nonthrombotic iliac vein lesion group through 36 months. The overall mean lesion length was 112.4 mm (SD ± 66.1). There were no stent fractures or migrations in this study. Quality of life and venous functional assessments demonstrated significant improvements from baseline to 36 months across all patient subsets.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from the ABRE study demonstrated sustained patency with a good safety profile after implantation of a dedicated venous stent in patients with symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction disease.

A Late Presentation of Right Common Iliac Vein Stent Embolization to the Right Atrium: Important Management Considerations

Stent migration is a rare but serious complication of venous stenting, often presenting with chest pain, shortness of breath, and signs of heart failure. Potential complications include arrhythmia, perforation, and valve destruction. Here we present an asymptomatic patient with a late presentation of right common iliac vein stent migration to the right atrium.

The background and role of catheter-directed thrombolysis evolving procedures for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis

Minimal invasive treatment such as early endovenous thrombus removal for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) emerged in the end of last century. The principle is catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using either plasminogen activating agents alone, as ultrasound-assisted CDT, or in combination with mechanical devices as pharmaco-mechanical CDT. The interest for this treatment modality is the high rate of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) with anticoagulation (AC) alone, especially after iliofemoral DVT. Recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early thrombus removal with AC alone, as well as non-randomized studies, have demonstrated favorable rates, or at least a decrease of moderate and severe PTS, in favor of these procedures. This article will summarize the background and evolution of the procedures in the last three decades and discuss fundamental criteria for inclusion and exclusion, focusing on the procedures regarding thrombus age and location, technical issues, complications and results including different outcome measures for PTS, for which iliac DVT involvement is a massive risk factor to be prevented.

Iliac Stent Migration to the Right Atrium-Late Detection, a Complex Clinical Problem

•Stent migration is a rare but serious complication of venous stent placement. •No clear guidelines exist on the management of stent migration. •Multimodality imaging is vital in multidisciplinary management of venous stent migration.

Iliac vein stenting and pregnancy

Venous stenting is the mainstay treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction. However, because pregnancy and the postpartum period are hypercoagulable, concerns exist regarding stent placement in women of childbearing age. We performed a systematic review up to April 2023 of studies reporting on the performance of venous stents in women who subsequently became pregnant. The data collected included demographics, indication for stenting, stent characteristics, stent-related complications, incidence of venous thromboembolism, medical management during pregnancy, and follow-up. The indications for stenting included acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis in 39 patients (51%), nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions in 35 (46%), and post-thrombotic lesions in 2 patients. A total of 76 women with 87 subsequent pregnancies after stenting were included. Of the 76 women, 1 (1.14%) experienced stent occlusion, 2 (2.29%) developed asymptomatic nonocclusive in-stent thrombus, and 2 (2.29%) experienced permanent stent compression. The only patency loss occurred because of inadequate anticoagulation therapy in a patient with antiphospholipid antibodies. The two cases of permanent compression occurred in an arterial stent and a balloon-fenestrated Vici stent (Boston Scientific). Venous stents performed well through pregnancy and can be safely used in women of childbearing age. Given the increased risk of venous thromboembolism and the low bleeding risk, it is prudent to recommend anticoagulation therapy for all stented patients until more data are available.

Ultrasound-guided stenting in the common femoral vein for accurate stent distal landing

Objective/Background

Venous stenting has been reported with excellent clinical results; however, inadequate inflow can increase the risk of stent occlusion. When extending the stent into the common femoral vein (CFV), it is essential to ensure adequate inflow from the femoral vein, deep femoral vein (DFV), and great saphenous vein. Accurate identification of the distal landing zone (DLZ) of the stent is crucial to ensure adequate inflow. The DLZ is usually determined by venography or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with reference to bony landmarks. However, the uncertainty can lead to misidentification of the DLZ and inadequate stent placement, resulting in stent occlusion.

Methods

From December 2016 to December 2022, 42 venous stent placements were performed in 40 patients with post-thrombotic iliofemoral vein obstruction and/or stenosis. Three patients had developed early stent occlusion owing to a misidentified DLZ. To improve accuracy in identifying the DLZ during venous stenting, ultrasound-guided placement was performed in the CFV of five patients (four on the left and one on the right) with post-thrombotic changes in the CFV and occlusion of the common iliac vein and external iliac vein. The distal end of the stent was adjusted just above the saphenofemoral junction in two cases and just proximal to the DFV confluence in three cases. Stent placement was verified using both long-axis ultrasound and fluoroscopy.

Results

Ultrasound images of the CFV region provided clear visualization of the stent deployment site and accurate landmark locations, such as the saphenofemoral junction and DFV confluence, allowing for precise adjustments during stent deployment. This technique enabled easier and more definitive identification of other branches of the CFV than previously provided by IVUS and venography. No complications were observed in any of the 42 cases, and long-term patency was achieved at the final follow-up after stenting (average, 10 months; range, 3-14 months).

Conclusions

Ultrasound-guided stenting in the CFV allows for real-time and accurate stent deployment with precise adjustment to the optimal DLZ. Using this technique, combined with venography and IVUS, missed distal lesions and subsequent stent occlusion can be prevented, potentially contributing to better treatment outcomes.

RETRACTED: Australian and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines on venous outflow Obstruction of the femoral-iliocaval veins

BACKGROUND

The overall goal of this report is to provide a high-level, practical approach to managing venous outflow obstruction (VOO) in Australia and New Zealand.

METHODS

A group of vascular surgeons from the Australian and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery with specific interest, training, and experience in the management of VOO were surveyed to assess current local practice. The results were analyzed and areas of disagreement identified. Following this, the group performed a literature review of consensus guidelines published by leading international organizations focused on the management of chronic venous disease, namely the Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, European Society for Vascular Surgery, American Vein and Lymphatic Society, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe, and American Heart Association. These guidelines were compared against the consensus statements obtained through the surveys to determine how they relate to Australian and New Zealand practice. In addition, selected key studies, reviews, and meta-analyses on venous stenting were discussed and added to the document. Finally, a selection of statements with >75% agreement was voted on, and barriers to the guideline's applicability were identified.

RESULTS

The document addresses two key areas: patient selection and technical aspects of venous stenting. Regarding patient selection, patients with a CEAP (Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Physiologic) score of ≥3 or a venous clinical severity score for pain of ≥2, or both, and evidence of >50% stenosis on venography, computed tomography venography, magnetic resonance venography, and/or intravascular ultrasound should be considered for venous stenting (level of recommendation Ib) Patients undergoing thrombus removal for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, in whom a culprit stenotic lesion has been uncovered, should be considered for venous stenting (level of recommendation Ib). Patients with chronic pelvic pain, deep dyspareunia, postcoital pain affecting their quality of life, when other causes have been ruled out, should be considered for venous stenting (level of recommendation Ic). Asymptomatic patients should not be offered venous stenting (level of recommendation IIIc).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with deep VOO have been underdiagnosed and undertreated for decades; however, in recent years, interest from physicians and industry has grown substantially. The advent of simpler and safer treatment options has revolutionized its management, but, unfortunately, formal training for venous disease has not grown at the same rate. Simplifying the technology and training required can result in inconsistent outcomes. These guidelines are aimed at developing standards of care and will serve as an educational platform for future developments.

Delphi Consensus on Reporting Standards in Clinical Studies for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis and Chronic Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction

Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction cause substantial patient harm and are increasingly managed with endovascular venous interventions, including percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy and stent placement. However, studies of these treatment elements have not been designed and reported with sufficient rigor to support confident conclusions about their clinical utility. In this project, the Trustworthy consensus-based statement approach was utilized to develop, via a structured process, consensus-based statements to guide future investigators of venous interventions. Thirty statements were drafted to encompass major topics relevant to venous study description and design, safety outcome assessment, efficacy outcome assessment, and topics specific to evaluating percutaneous venous thrombectomy and stent placement. Using modified Delphi techniques for consensus achievement, a panel of physician experts in vascular disease voted on the statements and succeeded in reaching the predefined threshold of >80% consensus (agreement or strong agreement) on all 30 statements. It is hoped that the guidance from these statements will improve standardization, objectivity, and patient-centered relevance in the reporting of clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction in clinical studies and thereby enhance venous patient care.

Twelve-month end point results from the evaluation of the Zilver Vena venous stent in the treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction (VIVO clinical study)

BACKGROUND

In the present study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the Zilver Vena venous stent in the treatment of patients with symptomatic iliofemoral outflow obstruction.

METHODS

The VIVO clinical study was a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study that enrolled patients with symptomatic obstruction of one iliofemoral venous segment. Included were patients with Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathophysiological (CEAP) clinical classification of ≥3 or a Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) pain score of ≥2. All patients received a self-expanding venous stent (Zilver Vena venous stent; Cook Ireland Ltd, Limerick, Ireland). The primary safety end point was 30-day freedom from major adverse events. The primary effectiveness end point was the 12-month rate of primary quantitative patency by venography as determined by the core laboratory. The secondary end point was the change in the VCSS from baseline to 1 and 12 months. Additional measures included freedom from clinically driven reintervention; change in the CEAP C classification, Venous Disability Score (VDS), and Chronic Venous Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (CIVIQ) scores from baseline to 12 months; and stent durability measures.

RESULTS

Between December 2013 and October 2016, 243 patients (70% female; mean age, 53 ± 15 years; 67.5% with current or previous deep vein thrombosis) were enrolled at 30 institutions. Iliac vein compression by the iliac artery (n = 191; 78.6%) was the primary indication for stent placement. The mean lesion length was 98.6 ± 69.8 mm. The 30-day freedom from major adverse events rate was 96.7%, greater than the literature-defined performance goal of 87% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.5%-98.6%; P < .0001). The 12-month primary quantitative patency rate was 89.9%, greater than the literature-defined performance goal of 76% (95% CI, 85.1%-93.4%; P < .0001). The change in the VCSS from baseline was -3.0 (95% CI, -3.5 to -2.6; P < .0001) at 1 month and -4.2 (95% CI, -4.7 to -3.7; P < .0001) at 12 months, demonstrating clinical improvement. Similarly, significantly (P < .0001) fewer symptoms over time (from preprocedure through 12 months) were measured using the clinical measures of VDS, CEAP C classification, and CIVIQ. The 12-month rate of freedom from clinically driven reintervention was 95.8% ± 1.3%. Through 12 months, no stent fractures and one clinical migration (Clinical Events Committee adjudicated the latter as technique-related due to device undersizing at placement) had occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The 12-month results of the VIVO study have demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the Zilver Vena venous stent for the treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction, including clinical symptom improvement compared with baseline.