Clinical adjacent segment pathology after anterior cervical discectomy, with and without fusion, for cervical degenerative disc disease: A single center retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up

Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Compared with Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Fusion for Cervical Radiculopathy: Two-Year Results of the FACET Randomized Noninferiority Study

BACKGROUND

Posterior cervical foraminotomy (posterior surgery) is a valid alternative to anterior discectomy with fusion (anterior surgery) as a surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy, but the quality of evidence has been limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of these treatments after 2 years of follow-up. We hypothesized that posterior surgery would be noninferior to anterior surgery.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial assessed patients with single-level cervical radiculopathy in 9 Dutch hospitals with a follow-up duration of 2 years. The primary outcomes measured reduction of cervical radicular pain and were the success ratio based on the Odom criteria, and arm pain and decrease in arm pain, evaluated with the visual analog scale, with a 10% noninferiority margin, which represents the maximum acceptable difference between the new treatment (posterior surgery) and the standard treatment (anterior surgery), beyond which the new treatment would be considered clinically unacceptable. The secondary outcomes were neck pain, Neck Disability Index, Work Ability Index, quality of life, complications (including reoperations), and treatment satisfaction. Generalized linear mixed effects modeling was used for analyses. The study was registered at the Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands (OMON), formerly the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR5536).

RESULTS

From January 2016 to May 2020, 265 patients were randomized (132 to the posterior surgery group and 133 to the anterior surgery group). Among these, 25 did not have the allocated intervention; 11 of these 25 patients had symptom improvement, and the rest of the patients did not have the intervention due to various reasons. At the 2-year follow-up, of 243 patients, primary outcome data were available for 236 patients (97%). Predicted proportions of a successful outcome were 0.81 after posterior surgery and 0.74 after anterior surgery (difference in rate, -0.06 [1-sided 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.02]), indicating the noninferiority of posterior surgery. The between-group difference in arm pain was -2.7 (1-sided 95% CI, 7.4) and the between-group difference in the decrease in arm pain was 1.5 (1-sided 95% CI, 8.2), both confirming the noninferiority of posterior surgery. The secondary outcomes demonstrated small between-group differences. Serious surgery-related adverse events occurred in 9 patients (8%) who underwent posterior surgery, including 9 reoperations, and 11 patients (9%) who underwent anterior surgery, including 7 reoperations (difference in reoperation rate, -0.02 [2-sided 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.05]).

CONCLUSIONS

This trial demonstrated that, after a 2-year follow-up, posterior surgery was noninferior to anterior surgery with regard to the success rate and arm pain reduction in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration and Its Associated Risk Factors Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and its associated risk factors in adults after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery.

METHODS

An exhaustive search across multiple databases was conducted, including Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science, to identify pertinent studies. We collected such patient data as demographic variables (including age, gender, body mass index), cervical spondylosis type (such as radiculopathy and myelopathy), diabetes status, smoking and drinking history, and radiological risk factors (such as preoperative ASD status, developmental spinal stenosis, T1 slope, and postoperative less cervical lordosis). Incidence estimates were calculated based on relevant data. Risk factors were assessed using odds ratios and weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Our analysis incorporated a total of 21 studies for incidence analysis. The overall incidence of CASD following ACDF was found to be 11% and radiographical ASD was 30%. Old age (weighted mean difference = 3.21; 95% CI: 0.06, 6.36; P = 0.05), preoperative ASD status (odds ratio = 2.65; 95% CI: 1.53, 4.60; P < 0.01), developmental spinal stenosis (odds ratio = 2.46; 95% CI: 1.61, 3.77; P < 0.01), and postoperative reduction in cervical lordosis were identified as significant risk factors for the occurrence of CASD.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of CASD following ACDF was 11%. Risk factors for CASD included old age, preoperative adjacent segment degeneration, developmental spinal stenosis, and postoperative reduction in cervical lordosis. These findings provide valuable insights for the assessment of adjacent segment disease risk after ACDF, aiding surgeons in diagnosis and treatment decisions.

Treatment of the two-level degenerative cervical disk diseases based on algorithmic anterior approach: a multicenter prospective study

To analyze the effectiveness of an algorithmic anterior approach to the surgical treatment of patients with two-level cervical degenerative disk disease based on the preoperative clinical and imaging parameters. The study included 244 patients with two-level cervical degenerative disk disease. Three groups of patients were evaluated at 3 neurosurgical centers between 2016-2019. The prospective group (Group I, n = 126) consisted of patients who were treated using an algorithm to decide whether they should be treated with a two-level Total Disk replacement (TDR), Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) and hybrid technique. The control group (Group II, n = 118) consisted of patients who underwent two-level anterior decompression with TDR, ACDF and hybrid stabilization between 2005-2015. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) neck pain, VAS upper limbs pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), SF-36, Macnab and Nurick scales were collected. Perioperative complications were identified. At 2 years of follow up Group I had significantly better clinical outcomes based on VAS neck pain score (p = 0.02), VAS upper limbs pain (p = 0.04), NDI score (p = 0.02), SF-36 score (p = 0.01), satisfaction with surgery on the Macnab scale (p < 0.001) and outcome of surgery based on Nurick scale (p < 0.001). Complication rate was lower in Group I, 6.3% compared to 24.6% in Group II, p = 0.0001. The algorithmic anterior approach to the surgical treatment of patients with two-level cervical degenerative disk disease resulted in significant improvement of functional outcomes and a decrease in complications at a minimum 2 years of follow-up.

Cervical alignment and clinical outcome of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion vs. anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in local kyphotic cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Background

Cervical local kyphosis (CLK) is a common degenerative disorder with a potentially debilitating and intractable condition. Currently, there is still debate on the optimal treatment of local kyphotic cervical spondylotic myelopathy (LKCSM) via different anterior approaches.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the surgical efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) vs. anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for the treatment of LKCSM. In addition, the cervical sagittal alignment parameters and axial symptoms (AS) severity after CLK correction were analyzed.

Materials and methods

From January 2016 and December 2020, 104 patients who suffered LKCSM were retrospectively reviewed. These patients underwent ACDF (n = 53) and ACCF (n = 51). Pre- and postoperatively, cervical sagittal alignment parameters were measured on the lateral X-rays, including local kyphotic angles (LKA), C2-7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA). The neurological recovery rate was calculated according to the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. The AS severity was evaluated using Neck Disability Index (NDI).

Results

Significant differences (P < 0.05) were demonstrated between ACDF and ACCF groups regarding LKA, LKA correction, C2-7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, C2-7 SVA, NDI, NDI recovery and NDI ranking system. However, no significant differences (P > 0.05) existed in JOA score, recovery rate, and neurological recovery rate grade. In both groups, significant differences (P < 0.05) were demonstrated between pre- and postoperative LKA, T1 slope, C2-7 Cobb angle, C2-7 SVA, JOA score, and NDI. LKA correction showed the positive correlations with the recovery rate (r = 0.48, P < 0.001), and with the NDI recovery in ACDF group (r = 0.49, P < 0.001) and in ACCF group (r = 0.55, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

LKCSM with ≤3 segments of spinal cord compression can be improved with either ACDF or ACCF, resulting in satisfactory neurological outcomes. CLK correction can significantly improve the neurological function and AS, and increase the T1 slope and C2-7 SVA. However, ACDF was more favorable than ACCF in the CLK correction.

Research protocol: Cervical Arthroplasty Cost Effectiveness Study (CACES): economic evaluation of anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) in the surgical treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease - a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

To date, there is no consensus on which anterior surgical technique is more cost-effective in treating cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). The most commonly used surgical treatment for patients with single- or multi-level symptomatic CDDD is anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF). However, new complaints of radiculopathy and/or myelopathy commonly develop at adjacent levels, also known as clinical adjacent segment pathology (CASP). The extent to which kinematics, surgery-induced fusion, natural history, and progression of disease play a role in the development of CASP remains unclear. Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) is another treatment option that is thought to reduce the incidence of CASP by preserving motion in the operated segment. While ACDA is often discouraged, as the implant costs are higher while the clinical outcomes are similar to ACDF, preventing CASP might be a reason for ACDA to be a more cost-effective technique in the long term.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this randomized controlled trial, patients will be randomized to receive ACDF or ACDA in a 1:1 ratio. Adult patients with single- or multi-level CDDD and symptoms of radiculopathy and/or myelopathy will be included. The primary outcome is cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of both techniques from a healthcare and societal perspective. Secondary objectives are the differences in clinical and radiological outcomes between the two techniques, as well as the qualitative process surrounding anterior decompression surgery. All outcomes will be measured at baseline and every 6 months until 4 years post-surgery.

DISCUSSION

High-quality evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of both ACDA and ACDF is lacking; to date, there are no prospective trials from a societal perspective. Considering the aging of the population and the rising healthcare costs, there is an urgent need for a solid clinical cost-effectiveness trial addressing this question.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04623593. Registered on 29 September 2020.