1
|
Neuhoff J, Kramer A, Thavarajasingam SG, Sutherland RK, McCaughan H, Joerger AK, Wostrack M, Lyell B, Berkulian O, Ponniah HS, Ramsay DSC, Meyer B, Kandziora F, Shiban E, Davies B, Demetriades AK, Ringel F. Comparing Conservative and Early Surgical Treatments for Pyogenic Spondylodiskitis: An International Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Outcome Analysis. Neurosurgery 2024:00006123-990000000-01393. [PMID: 39471086 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/28/2024] [Indexed: 11/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Pyogenic spinal infections pose therapeutic challenges, with the optimal treatment approach remaining contentious. This study aimed to compare outcomes of conservative vs early surgical treatment (SuT) modalities in primary pyogenic spondylodiskitis through an international cohort analysis. METHODS A retrospective outcome analysis was conducted of 392 patients from the United Kingdom and Germany, treated between 2017 and 2022 with primary pyogenic spondylodiskitis. Patients were stratified by treatment modality. Propensity score matching, facilitated by a directed acyclic graph and principal component analysis, was used to balance risk factors between the compared patient cohorts. Primary outcome was mortality rate, while secondary outcomes included hospitalization duration, infection relapse, and neurological status at discharge. RESULTS The study included 95 patients undergoing conservative treatment, primarily treated in the United Kingdom, and 297 receiving SuT, predominantly in Germany. The mortality rate was notably higher in the conservative group (P < .001), while the surgical cohort experienced a shorter hospitalization duration (P < .01). After propensity score matching, 2 comparable cohorts of 95 patients each emerged. Subsequent analysis revealed a markedly increased mortality in the conservative group (24.2% for conservative treatment vs 4.2% for SuT, P < .001). Neither relapse nor neurological status at discharge showed significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION The study indicates that early surgical intervention may be more effective than conservative management in reducing mortality and hospital stay for patients with primary pyogenic spondylodiskitis. These findings highlight the need for prospective trials and more definitive treatment guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Neuhoff
- Center for Spinal Surgery and Neurotraumatology, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Spondylodiscitis Study Group, EANS Spine Section, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andreas Kramer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Spondylodiscitis Study Group, EANS Spine Section, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Santhosh G Thavarajasingam
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Imperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Spondylodiscitis Study Group, EANS Spine Section, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Hugh McCaughan
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ann-Kathrin Joerger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Wostrack
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Barrie Lyell
- Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Olga Berkulian
- Center for Spinal Surgery and Neurotraumatology, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Hariharan Subbiah Ponniah
- Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Daniele S C Ramsay
- Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Frank Kandziora
- Center for Spinal Surgery and Neurotraumatology, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ehab Shiban
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Spondylodiscitis Study Group, EANS Spine Section, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Benjamin Davies
- Department of Academic Neurosurgery, Addenbroke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Healthcare Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Spondylodiscitis Study Group, EANS Spine Section, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andreas K Demetriades
- Edinburgh Spinal Surgery Outcome Studies Group, Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- Spondylodiscitis Study Group, EANS Spine Section, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Florian Ringel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Spondylodiscitis Study Group, EANS Spine Section, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Petri F, Mahmoud OK, Zein SE, Alavi SMA, Passerini M, Diehn FE, Verdoorn JT, Tande AJ, Nassr A, Freedman BA, Murad MH, Berbari EF. Wide variability of the definitions used for native vertebral osteomyelitis: walking the path for a unified diagnostic framework with a meta-epidemiological approach. Spine J 2024:S1529-9430(24)01047-7. [PMID: 39349257 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2024] [Revised: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 09/14/2024] [Indexed: 10/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis (NVO) has seen a rise in incidence, yet clinical outcomes remain poor with high relapse rates and significant long-term sequelae. The 2015 IDSA Clinical Practice Guidelines initiated a surge in scholarly activity on NVO, revealing a patchwork of definitions and numerous synonyms used interchangeably for this syndrome. PURPOSE To systematically summarize these definitions, evaluate their content, distribution over time, and thematic clustering. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Meta-epidemiological study with a systematic review of definitions. PATIENTS SAMPLE An extensive search of multiple databases was conducted, targeting trials and cohort studies dating from 2005 to present, providing a definition for NVO and its synonyms. OUTCOME MEASURES Analysis of the diagnostic criteria that composed the definitions and the breaking up of the definitions in the possible combinations of diagnostic criteria. METHODS We pursued a thematic synthesis of the published definitions with Boolean logic, yielding single or multiple definitions per included study. Using 8 predefined diagnostic criteria, we standardized definitions, focusing on the minimum necessary combinations used. Definition components were visualized using Sankey diagrams. RESULTS The literature search identified 8,460 references, leading to 171 studies reporting on 21,963 patients. Of these, 91.2% were retrospective, 7.6% prospective, and 1.2% RCTs. Most definitions originated from authors, with 29.2% referencing sources. We identified 92 unique combinations of diagnostic criteria across the literature. Thirteen main patterns emerged, with the most common being clinical features with imaging, followed by clinical features combined with imaging and microbiology, and lastly, imaging paired with microbiology. CONCLUSIONS Our findings underscore the need for a collaborative effort to develop standardized diagnostic criteria. We advocate for a future Delphi consensus among experts to establish a unified diagnostic framework for NVO, emphasizing the core components of clinical features and MRI while incorporating microbiological and histopathological insights to improve both patient outcomes and research advancements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Petri
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905, MN, USA; Department of Infectious Diseases, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, "L. Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, 20157, Italy.
| | - Omar K Mahmoud
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905, MN, USA
| | - Said El Zein
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905, MN, USA
| | | | - Matteo Passerini
- Department of Infectious Diseases, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, "L. Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, 20157, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milano, Milan, 20122, Italy
| | - Felix E Diehn
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905, MN, USA
| | | | - Aaron J Tande
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905, MN, USA
| | - Ahmad Nassr
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905, MN, USA
| | - Brett A Freedman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905, MN, USA
| | - M Hassan Murad
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905, MN, USA; Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905, MN, USA
| | - Elie F Berbari
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pantel T, Mende KC, Stangenberg M, Mohme M, Mohme T, Floeth F, Eicker SO, Dreimann M. Regional Spondylodiscitis Disparities: Impact on Pathogen Spectrum and Patients. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2557. [PMID: 38731085 PMCID: PMC11084223 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Spondylodiscitis is an infectious disease affecting an intervertebral disc and the adjacent vertebral bodies and is often the complication of a distant focus of infection. This study aims to ascertain the regional and hospital-specific disparities in bacterial patterns and resistance profiles in spontaneous and iatrogenic spondylodiscitis and their implications for patient treatment. Methods: We enrolled patients from two German hospitals, specifically comparing a university hospital (UVH) with a peripheral non-university hospital (NUH). We documented patient demographics, laboratory results, and surgical interventions. Microbiological assessments, antibiotic regimens, treatment durations, and resistance profiles were recorded. Results: This study included 135 patients. Upon admission, 92.4% reported pain, with 16.2% also presenting neurological deficits. The primary microbial species identified in both the UVH and NUH cohorts were S. aureus (37.3% vs. 31.3%) and cog. neg. staphylococci (28.8% vs. 34.4%), respectively. Notably, a higher prevalence of resistant bacteria was noted in the UVH group (p < 0.001). Additionally, concomitant malignancies were significantly more prevalent in the UVH cohort. Conclusion: Significant regional variations exist in bacterial prevalence and resistance profiles. Consequently, treatment protocols need to consider these nuances and undergo regular critical evaluation. Moreover, patients with concurrent malignancies face an elevated risk of spondylodiscitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Pantel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hamburg University Medical Center, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Christian Mende
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hamburg University Medical Center, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Friedrich-Ebert-Krankenhaus, Friesenstr. 11, 24534 Neumünster, Germany
| | - Martin Stangenberg
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Hamburg University Medical Center, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Spine and Neurosurgery, Tabea Krankenhaus Hamburg, Kösterbergstraße 32, 22587 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Malte Mohme
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hamburg University Medical Center, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Theresa Mohme
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hamburg University Medical Center, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Wirbelwerk Hamburg, Orchideenstieg 12, 22297 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Frank Floeth
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Hospital zum Heiligen Geist, Von-Broichhausen-Allee 1, 47906 Kempen, Germany
| | - Sven Oliver Eicker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hamburg University Medical Center, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Spine and Scoliosis Surgery, Lubinus Clinicum, Steenbeker Weg 25, 24106 Kiel, Germany
| | - Marc Dreimann
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Hamburg University Medical Center, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Spine, Orthopädische Klinik Markgröningen, Kurt-Lindemann-Weg 10, 71706 Markgröningen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lindsay SE, Gehling H, Ryu WHA, Yoo J, Philipp T. Posterior Fixation Without Debridement for Vertebral Body Osteomyelitis and Discitis: A 10-Year Retrospective Review. Int J Spine Surg 2023; 17:771-778. [PMID: 37586747 PMCID: PMC10753329 DOI: 10.14444/8541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis, discitis, and epidural abscesses is indicated in the setting of failure of antibiotic therapy, neurological deficits, epidural abscess, or spinal instability/deformity. Historically, surgical treatment mandated aggressive debridement and spinal stabilization. However, there is growing evidence that direct debridement may not be necessary and may contribute to morbidity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of posterior instrumentation without debridement in treating spinal infections. METHODS A retrospective medical record review was performed to identify patients treated with posterior instrumentation for spontaneous spinal infections. Success of treatment was determined based on postoperative ambulatory status, surgical complications, and need for revision surgery. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients treated with posterior-only long-segmented rigid fixation without formal debridement of infected material were included. The most common indications for surgical intervention included spinal instability (67%), neurologic compromise (67%), and failure of prolonged antibiotic treatment (63%). There were no recurrent deep infections in 21 of 22 patients who had long-term follow-up. Four patients required revision surgery, and 3 additional patients requested elective hardware removal. Postoperatively, 70% were ambulatory with no assistive devices postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Vertebral osteomyelitis/discitis are challenging medical problems. Single-stage long-segment fusion without formal debridement combined with antibiotics is effective in the management of spontaneous spinal infections. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The present study suggests that acute instrumentation without anterior debridement is associated with a resolution of infection and improvements in neurologic deficits in patient with spontaneous spine infections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Lindsay
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Hanne Gehling
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Won Hyung A Ryu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jung Yoo
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Travis Philipp
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Poon MTC, Demetriades AK. Routine healthcare data for adverse events after spinal surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165:3991-3992. [PMID: 37659043 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05783-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T C Poon
- Edinburgh Spinal Surgery Outcome Studies Group, Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 50 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Chancellor's Building, The University of Edinburgh, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK
| | - Andreas K Demetriades
- Edinburgh Spinal Surgery Outcome Studies Group, Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 50 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Chancellor's Building, The University of Edinburgh, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Neuhoff J, Berkulian O, Kramer A, Thavarajasingam S, Wengert A, Schleicher P, Pingel A, Kandziora F. Single- and Multilevel Corpectomy and Vertebral body replacement for treatment of spinal infections. A retrospective single-center study of 100 cases. BRAIN & SPINE 2023; 4:102721. [PMID: 38510622 PMCID: PMC10951701 DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.102721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Background The optimal operative approach for treating spinal infections remains a subject of debate. Corpectomy and Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR) have emerged as common modalities, yet data on their feasibility and complication profiles are limited. Methods This retrospective single-center study examined 100 consecutive cases (2015-2022) that underwent VBR for spinal infection treatment. A comparison between Single-level-VBR and Multi-level-VBR was performed, evaluating patient profiles, revision rates, and outcomes. Results Among 360 cases treated for spinal infections, 100 underwent VBR, located in all spinal regions. Average clinical and radiologic follow-up spanned 1.5 years. Single-level-VBR was performed in 60 cases, Two-level-VBR in 37, Three-level-VBR in 2, and Four-level-VBR in one case.Mean overall sagittal correction reached 10° (range 0-54°), varying by region. Revision surgery was required in 31 cases. Aseptic mechanical complications (8% pedicle screw loosening, 3% cage subsidence, 6% aseptic adjacent disc disease) were prominent reasons for revision. Longer posterior constructs (>4 levels) had significantly higher revision rates (p < 0.01). General complications (wound healing, hematoma) followed, along with infection relapse and adjacent disc infection (9%) and neurologic impairment (1%).Multilevel-VBR (≥2 levels) displayed no elevated cage subsidence rate compared to Single-level-VBR. Three deaths occurred (43-86 days post-op), all in the Multi-level-VBR group. Conclusion This study, reporting the largest number of VBR cases for spinal infection treatment, affirmed VBR's effectiveness in sagittal imbalance correction. The overall survival was high, while reinfection rates matched other surgical studies. Anterior procedures have minimal implant related risks, but extended dorsal instrumentation elevates revision surgery likelihood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Neuhoff
- BG Unfallklinik, Center for Spinal Surgery and Neurotraumatology, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - O. Berkulian
- BG Unfallklinik, Center for Spinal Surgery and Neurotraumatology, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - A. Kramer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - S. Thavarajasingam
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
- Imperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - A. Wengert
- BG Unfallklinik, Center for Spinal Surgery and Neurotraumatology, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - P. Schleicher
- BG Unfallklinik, Center for Spinal Surgery and Neurotraumatology, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - A. Pingel
- BG Unfallklinik, Center for Spinal Surgery and Neurotraumatology, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - F. Kandziora
- BG Unfallklinik, Center for Spinal Surgery and Neurotraumatology, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kramer A, Thavarajasingam SG, Neuhoff J, Ponniah HS, Ramsay DSC, Demetriades AK, Davies BM, Shiban E, Ringel F. Epidemiological trends of pyogenic spondylodiscitis in Germany: an EANS Spine Section Study. Sci Rep 2023; 13:20225. [PMID: 37980371 PMCID: PMC10657388 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47341-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Pyogenic spondylodiscitis presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. In Germany, a comprehensive understanding of its epidemiology and inpatient management outcomes is limited, hindering the optimisation of therapeutic strategies. This study aimed to characterise the evolving epidemiological trends of pyogenic spondylodiscitis in Germany, and concurrently evaluate inpatient management strategies and outcomes. We performed a retrospective population-based study of spondylodiscitis cases in Germany from 2005 to 2021, utilising data from the German Federal Statistical Office database. The parameters assessed were incidence trends, demographic characteristics, inpatient management strategies, and inpatient mortality. The study found a significant rise in the population-adjusted incidence of spondylodiscitis in Germany from 2005 to 2021, increasing by 104% from 5.4 to 11.0 cases per 100,000 individuals (p < 0.001). The highest number of diagnoses was recorded in 2019. Age group-adjusted data revealed the largest relative changes in the "90 + " age group, followed by the "80-89" and "70-79" age groups. These increases were not solely attributable to population changes but were also confirmed after calculating the age-group-adjusted incidence rates. Additionally, our statistical analysis demonstrated that both age and year significantly influenced the incidence of spondylodiscitis. Over the same period, inpatient mortality also surged significantly by 347% (p < 0.001), with the highest increase recorded in the 90 + age group, observing a 2450% rise (p < 0.001). The mean length of inpatient stay decreased by 15% (p < 0.05). Concurrently, there was a significant increase in surgical interventions using spinal stabilisation procedures (p < 0.001), which might suggest a shift in the treatment paradigm for spondylodiscitis. The results underscore a concerning rise in spondylodiscitis incidence and mortality in Germany, particularly affecting the ageing population. A notable shift towards surgical intervention was observed. The data highlights the urgent necessity for high-level evidence studies comparing surgical versus conservative treatment, thereby guiding optimised therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Kramer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
- Spondylodiscitis Study Group, EANS Spine Section, Brussels, Belgium.
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstraße. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Santhosh G Thavarajasingam
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Academic Neurosurgery, Addenbroke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Healthcare Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Imperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Spondylodiscitis Study Group, EANS Spine Section, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jonathan Neuhoff
- Center for Spinal Surgery and Neurotraumatology, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
- Spondylodiscitis Study Group, EANS Spine Section, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hariharan Subbiah Ponniah
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Daniele S C Ramsay
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Andreas K Demetriades
- Edinburgh Spinal Surgery Outcome Studies Group, Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- Spondylodiscitis Study Group, EANS Spine Section, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Benjamin M Davies
- Department of Academic Neurosurgery, Addenbroke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Healthcare Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Spondylodiscitis Study Group, EANS Spine Section, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ehab Shiban
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Spondylodiscitis Study Group, EANS Spine Section, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Florian Ringel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Spondylodiscitis Study Group, EANS Spine Section, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|