PI3K pathway is involved in ERK signaling cascade activation by histamine H2R agonist in HEK293T cells

PI3 kinase inhibitor PI828 uncouples aminergic GPCRs and Ca2+ mobilization irrespectively of its primary target

The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) is involved in regulation of multiple intracellular processes. Although the inhibitory analysis is generally employed for validating a physiological role of PI3K, increasing body of evidence suggests that PI3K inhibitors can exhibit PI3K-unrelated activity as well. Here we studied Ca2+ signaling initiated by aminergic agonists in a variety of different cells and analyzed effects of the PI3K inhibitor PI828 on cell responsiveness. It turned out that PI828 inhibited Ca2+ transients elicited by acetylcholine (ACh), histamine, and serotonin, but did not affect Ca2+ responses to norepinephrine and ATP. Another PI3K inhibitor wortmannin negligibly affected Ca2+ signaling initiated by any one of the tested agonists. Using the genetically encoded PIP3 sensor PH(Akt)-Venus, we confirmed that both PI828 and wortmannin effectively inhibited PI3K and ascertained that this kinase negligibly contributed to ACh transduction. These findings suggested that PI828 inhibited Ca2+ responses to aminergic agonists tested, involving an unknown cellular mechanism unrelated to the PI3K inhibition. Complementary physiological experiments provided evidence that PI828 could inhibit Ca2+ signals induced by certain agonists, by acting extracellularly, presumably, through their surface receptors. For the muscarinic M3 receptor, this possibility was verified with molecular docking and molecular dynamics. As demonstrated with these tools, wortmannin could be bound in the extracellular vestibule at the muscarinic M3 receptor but this did not preclude binding of ACh to the M3 receptor followed by its activation. In contrast, PI828 could sterically block the passage of ACh into the allosteric site, preventing activation of the muscarinic M3 receptor.

Wound Repair and Extremely Low Frequency-Electromagnetic Field: Insight from In Vitro Study and Potential Clinical Application

Wound healing is a complex, staged process. It involves extensive communication between the different cellular constituents of various compartments of the skin and its extracellular matrix (ECM). Different signaling pathways are determined by a mutual influence on each other, resulting in a dynamic and complex crosstalk. It consists of various dynamic processes including a series of overlapping phases: hemostasis, inflammation response, new tissue formation, and tissue remodeling. Interruption or deregulation of one or more of these phases may lead to non-healing (chronic) wounds. The most important factor among local and systemic exogenous factors leading to a chronic wound is infection with a biofilm presence. In the last few years, an increasing number of reports have evaluated the effects of extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic fields (EMFs) on tissue repair. Each experimental result comes from a single element of this complex process. An interaction between ELF-EMFs and healing has shown to effectively modulate inflammation, protease matrix rearrangement, neo-angiogenesis, senescence, stem-cell proliferation, and epithelialization. These effects are strictly related to the time of exposure, waveform, frequency, and amplitude. In this review, we focus on the effect of ELF-EMFs on different wound healing phases.

A phase Ib open-label dose escalation study of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of cobimetinib (GDC-0973) and ipatasertib (GDC-0068) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors

BACKGROUND

This Phase Ib study explored combination dosing of the allosteric MEK1/2 inhibitor cobimetinib and the ATP-competitive pan-AKT inhibitor ipatasertib.

METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled to two dose escalation arms, each using a 3 + 3 design in 28-day cycles. In Arm A, patients received concurrent cobimetinib and ipatasertib on days 1-21. In Arm B, cobimetinib was administered intermittently with ipatasertib for 21 days. Primary objectives evaluated dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated doses (MTD), and the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives included analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters, MAPK and PI3K pathway alterations, changes in tissue biomarkers, and preliminary anti-tumor efficacy. Expansion cohorts included patients with PTEN-deficient triple-negative breast cancer and endometrial cancer.

RESULTS

Among 66 patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug, all experienced an adverse event (AE). Although no DLTs were reported, 6 patients experienced Cycle 1 DLT-equivalent AEs. The most common treatment-related AEs were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, dermatitis acneiform, and fatigue. Thirty-five (53%) patients experienced drug-related AEs of ≥ grade 3 severity. Cobimetinb/ipatasertib MTDs were 60/200 mg on Arm A and 150/300 mg on Arm B; the latter was chosen as the RP2D. No pharmacokinetic interactions were identified. Biomarker analyses indicated pathway blockade and increases in IFNγ and PD-L1 gene expression following the combination. Three patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer achieved partial response, all with PTEN-low disease and two with tumor also harboring KRAS mutation.

CONCLUSION

There was limited tolerability and efficacy for this MEK and AKT inhibitor combination. Nonetheless, pharmacodynamic analyses indicated target engagement and suggest rationale for further exploration of cobimetinib or ipatasertib in combination with other anticancer agents. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01562275.

MRP4/ABCC4 expression is regulated by histamine in acute myeloid leukemia cells, determining cAMP efflux

Intracellular cAMP (i-cAMP) levels play an important role in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell proliferation and differentiation. Its levels are the result of cAMP production, degradation, and exclusion. We have previously described histamine H₂ receptors and MRP4/ABCC4 as two potential targets for AML therapy. Acting through histamine H₂ receptors, histamine increases cAMP production/synthesis, while MRP4/ABCC4 is responsible for the exclusion of this cyclic nucleotide. In this study, we show that histamine treatment induces MRP4/ABCC4 expression, augmenting cAMP efflux, and that histamine, in combination with MRP inhibitors, is able to reduce AML cell proliferation. Histamine, through histamine H₂ receptor, increases i-cAMP levels and induces MRP4 transcript and protein levels in U937, KG1a, and HL-60 cells. Moreover, histamine induces MRP4 promoter activity in HEK293T cells transfected with histamine H₂ receptor (HEK293T-H₂ R). Our results support that the cAMP/Epac-PKA pathway, and not MEK/ERK nor PI3K/AKT signaling cascades, is involved in histamine-mediated upregulation of MRP4 levels. Finally, the addition of histamine potentiates the inhibition of U937, KG1a, and HL-60 cell proliferation induced by MRP4 inhibitors. Our data highlight that the use of a poly-pharmacological approach aimed at different molecular targets would be beneficial in AML treatment.

Mechanisms of resistance to a PI3K inhibitor in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an omic approach to identify novel druggable targets

Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represent a worldwide paradigm of target therapy. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has deeply changed the prognosis of GIST patients, however, the majority of them acquire secondary mutations and progress. Unfortunately, besides tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, no other therapeutic options are available. Therefore, it is mandatory to identify novel molecules and/or strategies to overcome the inevitable resistance. In this context, after promising preclinical data on the novel PI3K inhibitor BYL719, the NCT01735968 trial in GIST patients who had previously failed treatment with imatinib and sunitinib started. BYL719 has attracted our attention, and we comprehensively characterized genomic and transcriptomic changes taking place during resistance.

Methods: For this purpose, we generated two in vitro GIST models of acquired resistance to BYL719 and performed an omic-based analysis by integrating RNA-sequencing, miRNA, and methylation profiles in sensitive and resistant cells.

Results: We identified novel epigenomic mechanisms of pharmacological resistance in GISTs suggesting the existence of pathways involved in drug resistance and alternatively acquired mutations. Therefore, epigenomics should be taken into account as an alternative adaptive mechanism.

Conclusion: Despite the fact that currently we do not have patients in treatment with BYL719 to verify this hypothesis, the most intriguing result is the involvement of H19 and PSTA1 in GIST resistance, which might represent druggable targets.

RAF dimers control vascular permeability and cytoskeletal rearrangements at endothelial cell-cell junctions

The endothelium functions as a semipermeable barrier regulating fluid homeostasis, nutrient, and gas supply to the tissue. Endothelial permeability is increased in several pathological conditions including inflammation and tumors; despite its clinical relevance, however, there are no specific therapies preventing vascular leakage. Here, we show that endothelial cell-restricted ablation of BRAF, a kinase frequently activated in cancer, prevents vascular leaking as well metastatic spread. BRAF regulates endothelial permeability by promoting the cytoskeletal rearrangements necessary for the remodeling of VE-Cadherin-containing endothelial cell-cell junctions and the formation of intercellular gaps. BRAF kinase activity and the ability to form complexes with RAS/RAP1 and dimers with its paralog RAF1 are required for proper permeability control, achieved mechanistically by modulating the interaction between RAF1 and the RHO effector ROKα. Thus, RAF dimerization impinges on RHO pathways to regulate cytoskeletal rearrangements, junctional plasticity, and endothelial permeability. The data advocate the development of RAF dimerization inhibitors, which would combine tumor cell autonomous effect with stabilization of the vasculature and antimetastatic spread.

Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields accelerates wound healing modulating MMP-9 and inflammatory cytokines

OBJECTIVES

In our previous reports, we have demonstrated that extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF) exposure enhances the proliferation of keratinocyte. The present study aimed to clarify effects of ELF-EMF on wound healing and molecular mechanisms involved, using a scratch in vitro model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The wounded monolayer cultures of human immortalized keratinocytes (HaCaT), at different ELF-EMF and Sham exposure times were monitored under an inverted microscope. The production and expression of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-18 and IL-18BP were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and quantitative real-time PCR. The activity and the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2/9 was evaluated by zymography and Western blot analysis, respectively. Signal transduction proteins expression (Akt and ERK) was measured by Western blot.

RESULTS

The results of wound healing in vitro assay revealed a significant reduction of cell-free area time-dependent in ELF-EMF-exposed cells compared to Sham condition. Gene expression and release of cytokines analysed were significantly increased in ELF-EMF-exposed cells. Our results further showed that ELF-EMF exposure induced the activity and expressions of MMP-9. Molecular data showed that effects of ELF-EMF might be mediated via Akt and ERK signal pathway, as demonstrated using their specific inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight ability of ELF-EMF to modulate inflammation mediators and keratinocyte proliferation/migration, playing an important role in wound repair. The ELF-EMF accelerates wound healing modulating expression of the MMP-9 via Akt/ERK pathway.

IP-10/CXCR3 Axis Promotes the Proliferation of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells through ERK1/2/CREB Signaling Pathway

Excessive proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells is one of the main pathological processes leading to atherosclerosis and intimal hyperplasia after vascular interventional therapy. Our previous study has shown that interferon-γ inducible protein-10 contributes to the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cell. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, serine/threonine kinase Akt, and cAMP response element binding protein are signaling pathways, which are considered to play important roles in the processes of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Moreover, chemokine receptor 3 and Toll-like receptor 4 are potential receptors of inducible protein-10 in this process. In the present study, IP-10 was found to directly induce vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, and exposure to inducible protein-10 activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, serine/threonine kinase, and cAMP response element binding protein signaling. Inhibitor of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, rather than inhibitor of serine/threonine kinase, inhibited the phosphorylation of cAMP response element binding protein and reduced inducible protein-10-stimulated vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Knockdown of cAMP response element binding protein by siRNA inhibited inducible protein-10-induced vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Moreover, anti-CXCR3 IgG, instead of anti-Toll-like receptor 4 IgG, reduced inducible protein-10-induced vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and inducible protein-10-stimulated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and cAMP response element binding protein activation. Together, these results indicate that inducible protein-10 promotes vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation via chemokine receptor 3 and activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 inducible protein-10-induced vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. These data provide important targets for future studies to modulate atherosclerosis and restenosis after vascular interventional therapy.

Current Knowledge and Perspectives on Histamine H1 and H2 Receptor Pharmacology: Functional Selectivity, Receptor Crosstalk, and Repositioning of Classic Histaminergic Ligands

H₁ and H₂ histamine receptor antagonists, although developed many decades ago, are still effective for the treatment of allergic and gastric acid-related conditions. This article focuses on novel aspects of the pharmacology and molecular mechanisms of histamine receptors that should be contemplated for optimizing current therapies, repositioning histaminergic ligands for new therapeutic uses, or even including agonists of the histaminergic system in the treatment of different pathologies such as leukemia or neurodegenerative disorders. In recent years, new signaling phenomena related to H₁ and H₂ receptors have been described that make them suitable for novel therapeutic approaches. Crosstalk between histamine receptors and other membrane or nuclear receptors can be envisaged as a way to modulate other signaling pathways and to potentiate the efficacy of drugs acting on different receptors. Likewise, biased signaling at histamine receptors seems to be a pharmacological feature that can be exploited to investigate nontraditional therapeutic uses for H₁ and H₂ biased agonists in malignancies such as acute myeloid leukemia and to avoid undesired side effects when used in standard treatments. It is hoped that the molecular mechanisms discussed in this review contribute to a better understanding of the different aspects involved in histamine receptor pharmacology, which in turn will contribute to increased drug efficacy, avoidance of adverse effects, or repositioning of histaminergic ligands.