1
|
Bao L, Zhu J, Shi T, Jiang Y, Li B, Huang J, Ji X. Increased transcriptional elongation and RNA stability of GPCR ligand binding genes unveiled via RNA polymerase II degradation. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:8165-8183. [PMID: 38842922 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
RNA polymerase II drives mRNA gene expression, yet our understanding of Pol II degradation is limited. Using auxin-inducible degron, we degraded Pol II's RPB1 subunit, resulting in global repression. Surprisingly, certain genes exhibited increased RNA levels post-degradation. These genes are associated with GPCR ligand binding and are characterized by being less paused and comprising polycomb-bound short genes. RPB1 degradation globally increased KDM6B binding, which was insufficient to explain specific gene activation. In contrast, RPB2 degradation repressed nearly all genes, accompanied by decreased H3K9me3 and SUV39H1 occupancy. We observed a specific increase in serine 2 phosphorylated Pol II and RNA stability for RPB1 degradation-upregulated genes. Additionally, α-amanitin or UV treatment resulted in RPB1 degradation and global gene repression, unveiling subsets of upregulated genes. Our findings highlight the activated transcription elongation and increased RNA stability of signaling genes as potential mechanisms for mammalian cells to counter RPB1 degradation during stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijun Bao
- Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Junyi Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Tingxin Shi
- Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Yongpeng Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Boyuan Li
- Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Jie Huang
- Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
- Beijing Advanced Center of RNA Biology (BEACON), Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Xiong Ji
- Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Valsakumar D, Voigt P. Nucleosomal asymmetry: a novel mechanism to regulate nucleosome function. Biochem Soc Trans 2024; 52:1219-1232. [PMID: 38778762 DOI: 10.1042/bst20230877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Nucleosomes constitute the fundamental building blocks of chromatin. They are comprised of DNA wrapped around a histone octamer formed of two copies each of the four core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. Nucleosomal histones undergo a plethora of posttranslational modifications that regulate gene expression and other chromatin-templated processes by altering chromatin structure or by recruiting effector proteins. Given their symmetric arrangement, the sister histones within a nucleosome have commonly been considered to be equivalent and to carry the same modifications. However, it is now clear that nucleosomes can exhibit asymmetry, combining differentially modified sister histones or different variants of the same histone within a single nucleosome. Enabled by the development of novel tools that allow generating asymmetrically modified nucleosomes, recent biochemical and cell-based studies have begun to shed light on the origins and functional consequences of nucleosomal asymmetry. These studies indicate that nucleosomal asymmetry represents a novel regulatory mechanism in the establishment and functional readout of chromatin states. Asymmetry expands the combinatorial space available for setting up complex sets of histone marks at individual nucleosomes, regulating multivalent interactions with histone modifiers and readers. The resulting functional consequences of asymmetry regulate transcription, poising of developmental gene expression by bivalent chromatin, and the mechanisms by which oncohistones deregulate chromatin states in cancer. Here, we review recent progress and current challenges in uncovering the mechanisms and biological functions of nucleosomal asymmetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devisree Valsakumar
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, U.K
- Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, U.K
| | - Philipp Voigt
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fetian T, Grover A, Arndt KM. Histone H2B ubiquitylation: Connections to transcription and effects on chromatin structure. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA. GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS 2024; 1867:195018. [PMID: 38331024 PMCID: PMC11098702 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2024.195018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
Nucleosomes are major determinants of eukaryotic genome organization and regulation. Many studies, incorporating a diversity of experimental approaches, have been focused on identifying and discerning the contributions of histone post-translational modifications to DNA-centered processes. Among these, monoubiquitylation of H2B (H2Bub) on K120 in humans or K123 in budding yeast is a critical histone modification that has been implicated in a wide array of DNA transactions. H2B is co-transcriptionally ubiquitylated and deubiquitylated via the concerted action of an extensive network of proteins. In addition to altering the chemical and physical properties of the nucleosome, H2Bub is important for the proper control of gene expression and for the deposition of other histone modifications. In this review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms underlying the ubiquitylation cycle of H2B and how it connects to the regulation of transcription and chromatin structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tasniem Fetian
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States of America
| | - Aakash Grover
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States of America
| | - Karen M Arndt
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li ASM, Homsi C, Bonneil E, Thibault P, Verreault A, Vedadi M. Histone H4K20 monomethylation enables recombinant nucleosome methylation by PRMT1 in vitro. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA. GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS 2023; 1866:194922. [PMID: 36822575 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2023.194922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) catalyze the transfer of methyl groups to specific arginine residues of histones and nonhistone proteins. There are nine members in the PRMT family (PRMT1 to PRMT9), and PRMT1 is a dominant member catalyzing majority of arginine methylation in the cell. However, none of the PRMTs is active with recombinant nucleosome as substrate in vitro. Here, we report the discovery of the first in class novel crosstalk between histone H4 lysine 20 (H4K20) monomethylation on nucleosome by SETD8 and histone H4 arginine 3 (H4R3) methylation by PRMT1 in vitro. Full kinetic characterization and mass spectrometry analysis indicated that PRMT1 is only active with recombinant nucleosomes monomethylated at H4K20 by SETD8. These data suggests that the level of activity of PRMT1 could potentially be regulated selectively by SETD8 in various pathways, providing a new approach for discovery of selective regulators of PRMT1 activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Shi Ming Li
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada; Drug Discovery Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Charles Homsi
- Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer (IRIC), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Eric Bonneil
- Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer (IRIC), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Pierre Thibault
- Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer (IRIC), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada; Department of Chemistry, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Alain Verreault
- Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer (IRIC), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada; Département de Pathologie et Biologie Cellulaire, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Masoud Vedadi
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada; Drug Discovery Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ganesan A, Dermadi D, Kalesinskas L, Donato M, Sowers R, Utz PJ, Khatri P. Inferring direction of associations between histone modifications using a neural processes-based framework. iScience 2022; 26:105756. [PMID: 36619977 PMCID: PMC9813700 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Current technologies do not allow predicting interactions between histone post-translational modifications (HPTMs) at a system-level. We describe a computational framework, imputation-followed-by-inference, to predict directed association between two HPTMs using EpiTOF, a mass cytometry-based platform that allows profiling multiple HPTMs at a single-cell resolution. Using EpiTOF profiles of >55,000,000 peripheral mononuclear blood cells from 158 healthy human subjects, we show that neural processes (NP) have significantly higher accuracy than linear regression and k-nearest neighbors models to impute the abundance of an HPTM. Next, we infer the direction of association to show we recapitulate known HPTM associations and identify several previously unidentified ones in healthy individuals. Using this framework in an influenza vaccine cohort, we identify changes in associations between 6 pairs of HPTMs 30 days following vaccination, of which several have been shown to be involved in innate memory. These results demonstrate the utility of our framework in identifying directed interactions between HPTMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ananthakrishnan Ganesan
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA,Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, School of Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA,Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Denis Dermadi
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA,Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Laurynas Kalesinskas
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA,Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Michele Donato
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA,Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Rosalie Sowers
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA,Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Paul J. Utz
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA,Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Purvesh Khatri
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA,Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA,Corresponding author
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Singh N, Asalam M, Ansari MO, Gerasimova NS, Studitsky VM, Akhtar MS. Transcription by RNA polymerase II and the CTD-chromatin crosstalk. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2022; 599:81-86. [PMID: 35176629 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.02.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The epigenetic phenomenon is known to derive the phenotypic variation of an organism through an interconnected cellular network of histone modifications, DNA methylation and RNA regulatory network. Transcription for protein coding genes is a highly regulated process and carried out by a large multi-complex RNA Polymerase II. The carboxy terminal domain (CTD) of the largest subunit of RNA Polymerase II consists of a conserved and highly repetitive heptad sequence Tyr1-Ser2-Pro3-Thr4-Ser5-Pro6-Ser7. The epigenetically modified CTD is thought to selectively bind different protein complexes that participate in mRNA biogenesis and export. The CTD and chromatin appears to have a spatial relationship during the transcription cycle, where the epigenetic modifications of CTD not only influence the state of histone modification but also mediates CTD-chromatin crosstalk. In this mini review, we have surveyed and discussed current developments of RNA Polymerase II CTD and its new emerging crosstalk with chromatin, during the stage specific progression of RNA Polymerase II in transcription cycle. This review is mainly focussed on the insights in budding yeast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neha Singh
- Biochemistry and Structural Biology Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
| | - Mohd Asalam
- Biochemistry and Structural Biology Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
| | - Mohd Owais Ansari
- Biochemistry and Structural Biology Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
| | - Nadezhda S Gerasimova
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vasily M Studitsky
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Md Sohail Akhtar
- Biochemistry and Structural Biology Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Francette AM, Tripplehorn SA, Arndt KM. The Paf1 Complex: A Keystone of Nuclear Regulation Operating at the Interface of Transcription and Chromatin. J Mol Biol 2021; 433:166979. [PMID: 33811920 PMCID: PMC8184591 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.166979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II is closely intertwined with the regulation of chromatin structure. A host of proteins required for the disassembly, reassembly, and modification of nucleosomes interacts with Pol II to aid its movement and counteract its disruptive effects on chromatin. The highly conserved Polymerase Associated Factor 1 Complex, Paf1C, travels with Pol II and exerts control over transcription elongation and chromatin structure, while broadly impacting the transcriptome in both single cell and multicellular eukaryotes. Recent studies have yielded exciting new insights into the mechanisms by which Paf1C regulates transcription elongation, epigenetic modifications, and post-transcriptional steps in eukaryotic gene expression. Importantly, these functional studies are now supported by an extensive foundation of high-resolution structural information, providing intimate views of Paf1C and its integration into the larger Pol II elongation complex. As a global regulatory factor operating at the interface between chromatin and transcription, the impact of Paf1C is broad and its influence reverberates into other domains of nuclear regulation, including genome stability, telomere maintenance, and DNA replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex M Francette
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States
| | - Sarah A Tripplehorn
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States
| | - Karen M Arndt
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Adamus K, Reboul C, Voss J, Huang C, Schittenhelm RB, Le SN, Ellisdon AM, Elmlund H, Boudes M, Elmlund D. SAGA and SAGA-like SLIK transcriptional coactivators are structurally and biochemically equivalent. J Biol Chem 2021; 296:100671. [PMID: 33864814 PMCID: PMC8131915 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The SAGA-like complex SLIK is a modified version of the Spt-Ada-Gcn5-Acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex. SLIK is formed through C-terminal truncation of the Spt7 SAGA subunit, causing loss of Spt8, one of the subunits that interacts with the TATA-binding protein (TBP). SLIK and SAGA are both coactivators of RNA polymerase II transcription in yeast, and both SAGA and SLIK perform chromatin modifications. The two complexes have been speculated to uniquely contribute to transcriptional regulation, but their respective contributions are not clear. To investigate, we assayed the chromatin modifying functions of SAGA and SLIK, revealing identical kinetics on minimal substrates in vitro. We also examined the binding of SAGA and SLIK to TBP and concluded that interestingly, both protein complexes have similar affinity for TBP. Additionally, despite the loss of Spt8 and C-terminus of Spt7 in SLIK, TBP prebound to SLIK is not released in the presence of TATA-box DNA, just like TBP prebound to SAGA. Furthermore, we determined a low-resolution cryo-EM structure of SLIK, revealing a modular architecture identical to SAGA. Finally, we performed a comprehensive study of DNA-binding properties of both coactivators. Purified SAGA and SLIK both associate with ssDNA and dsDNA with high affinity (KD = 10–17 nM), and the binding is sequence-independent. In conclusion, our study shows that the cleavage of Spt7 and the absence of the Spt8 subunit in SLIK neither drive any major conformational differences in its structure compared with SAGA, nor significantly affect HAT, DUB, or DNA-binding activities in vitro.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaudia Adamus
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cyril Reboul
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jarrod Voss
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cheng Huang
- Monash Proteomics & Metabolomics Facility, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ralf B Schittenhelm
- Monash Proteomics & Metabolomics Facility, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah N Le
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew M Ellisdon
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hans Elmlund
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marion Boudes
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Dominika Elmlund
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vlachonasios K, Poulios S, Mougiou N. The Histone Acetyltransferase GCN5 and the Associated Coactivators ADA2: From Evolution of the SAGA Complex to the Biological Roles in Plants. PLANTS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 10:308. [PMID: 33562796 PMCID: PMC7915528 DOI: 10.3390/plants10020308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Transcription of protein-encoding genes starts with forming a pre-initiation complex comprised of RNA polymerase II and several general transcription factors. To activate gene expression, transcription factors must overcome repressive chromatin structure, which is accomplished with multiprotein complexes. One such complex, SAGA, modifies the nucleosomal histones through acetylation and other histone modifications. A prototypical histone acetyltransferase (HAT) known as general control non-repressed protein 5 (GCN5), was defined biochemically as the first transcription-linked HAT with specificity for histone H3 lysine 14. In this review, we analyze the components of the putative plant SAGA complex during plant evolution, and current knowledge on the biological role of the key components of the HAT module, GCN5 and ADA2b in plants, will be summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Vlachonasios
- Department of Botany, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; (S.P.); (N.M.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nuño-Cabanes C, García-Molinero V, Martín-Expósito M, Gas ME, Oliete-Calvo P, García-Oliver E, de la Iglesia-Vayá M, Rodríguez-Navarro S. SAGA-CORE subunit Spt7 is required for correct Ubp8 localization, chromatin association and deubiquitinase activity. Epigenetics Chromatin 2020; 13:46. [PMID: 33115507 PMCID: PMC7594455 DOI: 10.1186/s13072-020-00367-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Histone H2B deubiquitination is performed by numerous deubiquitinases in eukaryotic cells including Ubp8, the catalytic subunit of the tetrameric deubiquitination module (DUBm: Ubp8; Sus1; Sgf11; Sgf73) of the Spt-Ada-Gcn5 acetyltransferase (SAGA). Ubp8 is linked to the rest of SAGA through Sgf73 and is activated by the adaptors Sus1 and Sgf11. It is unknown if DUBm/Ubp8 might also work in a SAGA-independent manner. Results Here we report that a tetrameric DUBm is assembled independently of the SAGA–CORE components SPT7, ADA1 and SPT20. In the absence of SPT7, i.e., independent of the SAGA complex, Ubp8 and Sus1 are poorly recruited to SAGA-dependent genes and to chromatin. Notably, cells lacking Spt7 or Ada1, but not Spt20, show lower levels of nuclear Ubp8 than wild-type cells, suggesting a possible role for SAGA–CORE subunits in Ubp8 localization. Last, deletion of SPT7 leads to defects in Ubp8 deubiquitinase activity in in vivo and in vitro assays. Conclusions Collectively, our studies show that the DUBm tetrameric structure can form without a complete intact SAGA–CORE complex and that it includes full-length Sgf73. However, subunits of this SAGA–CORE influence DUBm association with chromatin, its localization and its activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carme Nuño-Cabanes
- Gene Expression and RNA Metabolism Laboratory, Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), C/Jaume Roig 11, 46010, Valencia, Spain.,Gene Expression and RNA Metabolism Laboratory, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe (CIPF), C/E. Primo Yúfera 3, 46012, Valencia, Spain
| | - Varinia García-Molinero
- Gene Expression and RNA Metabolism Laboratory, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe (CIPF), C/E. Primo Yúfera 3, 46012, Valencia, Spain
| | - Manuel Martín-Expósito
- Gene Expression and RNA Metabolism Laboratory, Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), C/Jaume Roig 11, 46010, Valencia, Spain.,Gene Expression and RNA Metabolism Laboratory, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe (CIPF), C/E. Primo Yúfera 3, 46012, Valencia, Spain
| | - María-Eugenia Gas
- Gene Expression and RNA Metabolism Laboratory, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe (CIPF), C/E. Primo Yúfera 3, 46012, Valencia, Spain
| | - Paula Oliete-Calvo
- Gene Expression and RNA Metabolism Laboratory, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe (CIPF), C/E. Primo Yúfera 3, 46012, Valencia, Spain
| | - Encar García-Oliver
- Gene Expression and RNA Metabolism Laboratory, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe (CIPF), C/E. Primo Yúfera 3, 46012, Valencia, Spain
| | - María de la Iglesia-Vayá
- Brain Connectivity Lab. Joint Unit FISABIO & Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe (CIPF), C/E. Primo Yúfera 3, 46012, Valencia, Spain
| | - Susana Rodríguez-Navarro
- Gene Expression and RNA Metabolism Laboratory, Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), C/Jaume Roig 11, 46010, Valencia, Spain. .,Gene Expression and RNA Metabolism Laboratory, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe (CIPF), C/E. Primo Yúfera 3, 46012, Valencia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|