Cross-talk between lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 and tropomyosin receptor kinase A promotes lung epithelial cell migration

Molecular Regulation of Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor 1 Maturation and Desensitization

Lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 (LPA1) belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor family. The ligand for LPA1 is LPA, the simplest lysophospholipid. LPA is considered a growth factor and induces cell proliferation, anti-apoptosis, and cell migration. The pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic roles of LPA have also been well-demonstrated. Most of the biological functions of LPA are mostly executed through LPA1. The mature form of LPA1 is glycosylated and localized on the plasma membrane. LPA1 is bound to heterotrimetric G proteins and transduces intracellular signaling in response to ligation to LPA. Desensitization of LPA1 negatively regulates LPA1-mediated signaling and the resulting biological functions. Phosphorylation and ubiquitination are well-demonstrated posttranslational modifications of GPCR. In this review, we will discuss our knowledge of LPA1 glycosylation, maturation, and trafficking from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)/Golgi to the plasma membrane. Moreover, in light of recent findings, we will also discuss molecular regulation of LPA1 internalization and stability.

BRET analysis reveals interaction between the lysophosphatidic acid receptor LPA2 and the lysophosphatidylinositol receptor GPR55 in live cells

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and lysophosphatidylinositol bind to the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) LPA and GPR55, respectively. LPA₂ , a type 2 LPA receptor, and GPR55 are highly expressed in colon cancer and involved in cancer progression. However, crosstalk between the two receptors and potential effects on cellular physiology are not fully understood. Here, using BRET analysis, we found that LPA₂ and GPR55 interact in live cells. In the presence of both receptors, LPA₂ and/or GPR55 activation facilitated co-internalization, and activation of GPR55, uncoupled with Gα_i , induced reduction of intracellular cAMP. Notably, co-activation of receptors synergistically triggered further decline in the cAMP level, promoted cell proliferation, and increased the expression of cancer progression-related genes, suggesting that physical and functional crosstalk between LPA₂ and GRR55 is involved in cancer progression.

A blocking peptide stabilizes lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 and promotes lysophosphatidic acid-induced cellular responses

G protein-coupled receptors regulate a variety of cellular responses and have been considered as therapeutic targets for human diseases. Lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 (LPA1) is a receptor for bioactive lysophospholipid, LPA. LPA/LPA1-mediated signaling contributes to inflammatory and fibrotic responses in lung diseases; thus understanding regulation of LPA1 stability is important for modulating LPA/LPA1 signaling. Our previous study has shown that LPA1 is degraded in the Nedd4 like (Nedd4L) E3 ubiquitin ligase-mediated ubiquitin-proteasome system. In the current study, we attempt to identify a peptide that stabilizes LPA1 through disrupting LPA1 association with Nedd4L. LPA treatment induces both endogenous and overexpressed LPA1 degradation, which is attenuated by a proteasome inhibitor, suggesting that LPA1 is degraded in the proteasome. LPA increases phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (Erk1/2) and I-κB kinase in lung epithelial cells, and this effect is promoted by overexpression of a peptide (P1) that mimics C-terminal of LPA1. P1, not a control peptide, attenuates LPA-induced LPA1 ubiquitination and degradation, suggesting that P1 stabilizes LPA1. Further, P1 diminishes Nedd4L-mediated degradation of LPA1 and Nedd4L/LPA1 association. In addition to increasing LPA1 signaling, P1 enhances LPA-induced cell migration and gene expression of Elafin, matrix metallopeptidase 1, and serpin family B member 2 in lung epithelial cells. These data suggest that disruption of LPA1 interaction with Nedd4L by P1 increases LPA1 stability and LPA/LPA1 signaling.

CMTM8 as an LPA1-associated partner mediates lysophosphatidic acid-induced pancreatic cancer metastasis

Background

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is known to promote cancer cell invasiveness through LPA1, but the downstream signaling cascades are still not fully clarified. The CKLF-like MARVEL transmembrane domain-containing (CMTM) family regulates aggressive phenotype in many cancers.

Methods

We performed LPA1 co-immunoprecipitation combined with mass spectrometry to search for LPA1-associated proteins. The role of CMTM8 in mediating the pro-invasive activity of LPA was investigated in pancreatic cancer.

Results

We identified CMTM8 as an LPA1-interacting protein. LPA1 and CMTM8 were co-localized in pancreatic cancer cells. LPA treatment led to stabilization of CMTM8 protein, which was impaired by knockdown of LPA1. Depletion of CMTM8 significantly suppressed the migration and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells. Conversely, ectopic expression of CMTM8 enhanced the migratory and invasive capacity of pancreatic cancer cells. CMTM8 depletion blocked the formation of metastatic lesions in the lung. Knockdown of CMTM8 attenuated LPA-induced migration and invasion in pancreatic cancer cells. CMTM8 overexpression stimulated β-catenin activation through reduction of GSK3β. In addition, knockdown of β-catenin dramatically antagonized CMTM8-mediated migration and invasion in pancreatic cancer cells.

Conclusions

CMTM8 serves as a key mediator of LPA-induced invasiveness in pancreatic cancer. The interaction between CMTM8 and LPA1 leads to activation of oncogenic β-catenin signaling. CMTM8 represents a potential therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer.

Dihydroartemisinin inhibits the migration of esophageal cancer cells by inducing autophagy

Esophageal cancer (EC) is a complex gastrointestinal malignancy and its global incidence rate ranks 7th among all cancer types. Due to its aggressive nature and the potential for early metastasis, the survival rates of patients with EC are poor. Dihydroartemisinin (DHA) is the primary active derivative of artemisinin, and, as well as its use as an anti-malarial, DHA has also exhibited antitumor activity in various cancer models, such as cholangiocarcinoma, head and neck carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma cells. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the antitumor effect of DHA in the treatment of EC remains poorly understood. The results of the present study demonstrated that DHA significantly inhibited the migration of TE-1 and Eca-109 EC cells in a dose-dependent manner by activating autophagy. DHA treatment also significantly reversed epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) by downregulating the EMT-associated markers, N-cadherin and vimentin, and upregulating the expression of E-cadherin. Mechanistically, DHA treatment decreased Akt phosphorylation and inhibited the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, leading to the activation of autophagy. The levels of the autophagy-associated proteins were suppressed and DHA-mediated inhibition of migration in EC cells was reversed when an active form of Akt was overexpressed. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated the potential value of DHA in the treatment of EC, and revealed the underlying mechanism by which FDHA inhibits cellular migration.

Regulation of Eosinophil Recruitment and Allergic Airway Inflammation by Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase A

Eosinophilia is a hallmark of allergic airway inflammation (AAI). Identifying key molecules and specific signaling pathways that regulate eosinophilic inflammation is critical for development of novel therapeutics. Tropomycin receptor kinase A (TrkA) is the high-affinity receptor for nerve growth factor. AAI is associated with increased expression of TrkA by eosinophils; however, the functional role of TrkA in regulating eosinophil recruitment and contributing to AAI is poorly understood. This study identifies, to our knowledge, a novel mechanism of eotaxin-mediated activation of TrkA and its role in regulating eosinophil recruitment by using a chemical-genetic approach to specifically inhibit TrkA kinase activity with 1-NM-PP1 in TrkAF592A-knock-in (TrkA-KI) eosinophils. Blockade of TrkA by 1-NM-PP1 enhanced eosinophil spreading on VCAM-1 but inhibited eotaxin-1 (CCL11)-mediated eosinophil migration, calcium flux, cell polarization, and ERK1/2 activation, suggesting that TrkA is an important player in the signaling pathway activated by eotaxin-1 during eosinophil migration. Further, blockade of matrix metalloprotease with BB-94 inhibited eotaxin-1-induced TrkA activation and eosinophil migration, additively with 1-NM-PP1, indicating a role for matrix metalloproteases in TrkA activation. TrkA inhibition in Alternaria alternata-challenged TrkA-KI mice markedly inhibited eosinophilia and attenuated various features of AAI. These findings are indicative of a distinctive eotaxin-mediated TrkA-dependent signaling pathway, which, in addition to other TrkA-activating mediators, contributes to eosinophil recruitment during AAI and suggests that targeting the TrkA signaling pathway to inhibit eosinophil recruitment may serve as a therapeutic strategy for management of eosinophilic inflammation in allergic airway disease, including asthma.

Dynamic actin remodeling in response to lysophosphatidic acid

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a multifunctional regulator of actin cytoskeleton that exerts a dramatic impact on the actin cytoskeleton to build a platform for diverse cellular processes including growth cone guidance, neurite retraction and cell motility. It has been implicated in the formation and dissociation of complexes between actin and actin binding proteins, supporting its role in actin remodeling. Several studies point towards its ability to facilitate formation of special cellular structures including focal adhesions and actin stress fibres by phosphoregulation of several actin associated proteins and their multiple regulatory kinases and phosphatases. In addition, multiple levels of crosstalk among the signaling cascades activated by LPA, affect actin cytoskeleton-mediated cell migration and chemotaxis which in turn play a crucial role in cancer metastasis. In the current review, we have attempted to highlight the role of LPA as an actin modulator which functions by controlling activities of specific cellular proteins that underlie mechanisms employed in cytoskeletal and pathophysiological events within the cell. Further studies on the actin affecting/remodeling activity of LPA in different cell types will no doubt throw up many surprises essential to gain a full understanding of its contribution in physiological processes as well as in diseases.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Targeting Lysophosphatidic Acid in Cancer: The Issues in Moving from Bench to Bedside

Since the clear demonstration of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)'s pathological roles in cancer in the mid-1990s, more than 1000 papers relating LPA to various types of cancer were published. Through these studies, LPA was established as a target for cancer. Although LPA-related inhibitors entered clinical trials for fibrosis, the concept of targeting LPA is yet to be moved to clinical cancer treatment. The major challenges that we are facing in moving LPA application from bench to bedside include the intrinsic and complicated metabolic, functional, and signaling properties of LPA, as well as technical issues, which are discussed in this review. Potential strategies and perspectives to improve the translational progress are suggested. Despite these challenges, we are optimistic that LPA blockage, particularly in combination with other agents, is on the horizon to be incorporated into clinical applications.