Genetic intolerance analysis as a tool for protein science

Mendelian inheritance revisited: dominance and recessiveness in medical genetics

Understanding the consequences of genotype for phenotype (which ranges from molecule-level effects to whole-organism traits) is at the core of genetic diagnostics in medicine. Many measures of the deleteriousness of individual alleles exist, but these have limitations for predicting the clinical consequences. Various mechanisms can protect the organism from the adverse effects of functional variants, especially when the variant is paired with a wild type allele. Understanding why some alleles are harmful in the heterozygous state - representing dominant inheritance - but others only with the biallelic presence of pathogenic variants - representing recessive inheritance - is particularly important when faced with the deluge of rare genetic alterations identified by high throughput DNA sequencing. Both awareness of the specific quantitative and/or qualitative effects of individual variants and the elucidation of allelic and non-allelic interactions are essential to optimize genetic diagnosis and counselling.

Arginine Depletion in Human Cancers

Simple Summary

Thousands of cancer genomes are now publicly available which has led to new insights into the underlying features of cancers. These include the identification of mutational signatures at both nucleotide and amino acid levels. Here, we discuss C > T transitions as a key nucleotide-level mutational signature that leads to a dramatic overrepresentation of arginine substitutions in cancers. We propose that this underlying C > T mutational signature canalizes possible arginine substitution outcomes, favoring histidine, cysteine, glutamine, and tryptophan. This initial asymmetry is then acted on at the amino acid level by purifying selection. Thus, a model of “sequential selection” could explain the documented bias towards arginine substitutions in multiple cancers.

Abstract

Arginine is encoded by six different codons. Base pair changes in any of these codons can have a broad spectrum of effects including substitutions to twelve different amino acids, eighteen synonymous changes, and two stop codons. Four amino acids (histidine, cysteine, glutamine, and tryptophan) account for over 75% of amino acid substitutions of arginine. This suggests that a mutational bias, or “purifying selection”, mechanism is at work. This bias appears to be driven by C > T and G > A transitions in four of the six arginine codons, a signature that is universal and independent of cancer tissue of origin or histology. Here, we provide a review of the available literature and reanalyze publicly available data from the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC). Our analysis identifies several genes with an arginine substitution bias. These include known factors such as IDH1, as well as previously unreported genes, including four cancer driver genes (FGFR3, PPP6C, MAX, GNAQ). We propose that base pair substitution bias and amino acid physiology both play a role in purifying selection. This model may explain the documented arginine substitution bias in cancers.

De novo variants in CACNA1E found in patients with intellectual disability, developmental regression and social cognition deficit but no seizures

BACKGROUND

De novo variants in the voltage-gated calcium channel subunit α1 E gene (CACNA1E) have been described as causative of epileptic encephalopathy with contractures, macrocephaly and dyskinesias.

METHODS

Following the observation of an index patient with developmental delay and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) without seizures who had a de novo deleterious CACNA1E variant, we screened GeneMatcher for other individuals with CACNA1E variants and neurodevelopmental phenotypes without epilepsy. The spectrum of pathogenic CACNA1E variants was compared to the mutational landscape of variants in the gnomAD control population database.

RESULTS

We identified seven unrelated individuals with intellectual disability, developmental regression and ASD-like behavioral profile, and notably without epilepsy, who had de novo heterozygous putatively pathogenic variants in CACNA1E. Age of onset of clinical manifestation, presence or absence of regression and degree of severity were variable, and no clear-cut genotype-phenotype association could be recognized. The analysis of disease-associated variants and their comparison to benign variants from the control population allowed for the identification of regions in the CACNA1E protein that seem to be intolerant to substitutions and thus more likely to harbor pathogenic variants. As in a few reported cases with CACNA1E variants and epilepsy, one patient showed a positive clinical behavioral response to topiramate, a specific calcium channel modulator.

LIMITATIONS

The significance of our study is limited by the absence of functional experiments of the effect of identified variants, the small sample size and the lack of systematic ASD assessment in all participants. Moreover, topiramate was given to one patient only and for a short period of time.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that CACNA1E variants may result in neurodevelopmental disorders without epilepsy and expand the mutational and phenotypic spectrum of this gene. CACNA1E deserves to be included in gene panels for non-specific developmental disorders, including ASD, and not limited to patients with seizures, to improve diagnostic recognition and explore the possible efficacy of topiramate.

In Silico Predictions of KCNQ Variant Pathogenicity in Epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Variants in KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 may cause benign neonatal familial seizures and early infantile epileptic encephalopathy. Previous reports suggest that in silico models cannot predict pathogenicity accurately enough for clinical use. Here we sought to establish a model to accurately predict the pathogenicity of KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 missense variants based on available in silico prediction models.

METHODS

ClinVar and gnomAD databases of reported KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 missense variants in patients with neonatal epilepsy were accessed and classified as benign, pathogenic, or of uncertain significance. Sensitivity, specificity, and classification accuracy for prediction of pathogenicity were determined and compared for 10 widely used prediction algorithms program. A mathematical model of the variants (KCNQ Index) was created using their amino acid location and prediction algorithm scores to improve prediction accuracy.

RESULTS

Using clinically characterized variants, the free online tool PROVEAN accurately predicted pathogenicity 92% of the time and the KCNQ Index had an accuracy of 96%. However, when including the gnomAD database as benign variants, only the KCNQ Index was able to predict pathogenicity with an accuracy greater than 90% (sensitivity = 93% and specificity = 98%). No model could accurately predict the phenotype of variants.

CONCLUSION

We show that KCNQ channel variant pathogenicity can be predicted by a novel KCNQ Index in neonatal epilepsy. However, more work is needed to accurately predict the patient's epilepsy phenotype from in silico algorithms.