1
|
Qu HT, Li Q, Hao L, Ni YJ, Luan WY, Yang Z, Chen XD, Zhang TT, Miao YD, Zhang F. Esophageal cancer screening, early detection and treatment: Current insights and future directions. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:1180-1191. [PMID: 38660654 PMCID: PMC11037049 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i4.1180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Esophageal cancer ranks among the most prevalent malignant tumors globally, primarily due to its highly aggressive nature and poor survival rates. According to the 2020 global cancer statistics, there were approximately 604000 new cases of esophageal cancer, resulting in 544000 deaths. The 5-year survival rate hovers around a mere 15%-25%. Notably, distinct variations exist in the risk factors associated with the two primary histological types, influencing their worldwide incidence and distribution. Squamous cell carcinoma displays a high incidence in specific regions, such as certain areas in China, where it meets the cost-effectiveness criteria for widespread endoscopy-based early diagnosis within the local population. Conversely, adenocarcinoma (EAC) represents the most common histological subtype of esophageal cancer in Europe and the United States. The role of early diagnosis in cases of EAC originating from Barrett's esophagus (BE) remains a subject of controversy. The effectiveness of early detection for EAC, particularly those arising from BE, continues to be a debated topic. The variations in how early-stage esophageal carcinoma is treated in different regions are largely due to the differing rates of early-stage cancer diagnoses. In areas with higher incidences, such as China and Japan, early diagnosis is more common, which has led to the advancement of endoscopic methods as definitive treatments. These techniques have demonstrated remarkable efficacy with minimal complications while preserving esophageal functionality. Early screening, prompt diagnosis, and timely treatment are key strategies that can significantly lower both the occurrence and death rates associated with esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Tao Qu
- Department of Emergency, Yantai Mountain Hospital, Yantai 264000, Shandong Province, China
| | - Qing Li
- Cancer Center, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, The 2nd Medical College of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264100, Shandong Province, China
| | - Liang Hao
- Cancer Center, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, The 2nd Medical College of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264100, Shandong Province, China
| | - Yan-Jing Ni
- Cancer Center, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, The 2nd Medical College of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264100, Shandong Province, China
| | - Wen-Yu Luan
- Cancer Center, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, The 2nd Medical College of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264100, Shandong Province, China
| | - Zhe Yang
- Cancer Center, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, The 2nd Medical College of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264100, Shandong Province, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Chen
- Cancer Center, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, The 2nd Medical College of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264100, Shandong Province, China
| | - Tong-Tong Zhang
- Cancer Center, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, The 2nd Medical College of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264100, Shandong Province, China
| | - Yan-Dong Miao
- Cancer Center, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, The 2nd Medical College of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264100, Shandong Province, China
| | - Fang Zhang
- Cancer Center, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, The 2nd Medical College of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264100, Shandong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moldovan N, van der Pol Y, van den Ende T, Boers D, Verkuijlen S, Creemers A, Ramaker J, Vu T, Bootsma S, Lenos KJ, Vermeulen L, Fransen MF, Pegtel M, Bahce I, van Laarhoven H, Mouliere F. Multi-modal cell-free DNA genomic and fragmentomic patterns enhance cancer survival and recurrence analysis. Cell Rep Med 2024; 5:101349. [PMID: 38128532 PMCID: PMC10829758 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
The structure of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is altered in the blood of patients with cancer. From whole-genome sequencing, we retrieve the cfDNA fragment-end composition using a new software (FrEIA [fragment end integrated analysis]), as well as the cfDNA size and tumor fraction in three independent cohorts (n = 925 cancer from >10 types and 321 control samples). At 95% specificity, we detect 72% cancer samples using at least one cfDNA measure, including 64% early-stage cancer (n = 220). cfDNA detection correlates with a shorter overall (p = 0.0086) and recurrence-free (p = 0.017) survival in patients with resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma. Integrating cfDNA measures with machine learning in an independent test set (n = 396 cancer, 90 controls) achieve a detection accuracy of 82% and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96. In conclusion, harnessing the biological features of cfDNA can improve, at no extra cost, the diagnostic performance of liquid biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Moldovan
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ymke van der Pol
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tom van den Ende
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dries Boers
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra Verkuijlen
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Aafke Creemers
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jip Ramaker
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Neurosurgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Trang Vu
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sanne Bootsma
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kristiaan J Lenos
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Louis Vermeulen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke F Fransen
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pulmonology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel Pegtel
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Idris Bahce
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pulmonology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke van Laarhoven
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Florent Mouliere
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Paolini F, Campo F, Iocca O, Manciocco V, De Virgilio A, De Pascale V, Moretto S, Dalfino G, Vidiri A, Blandino G, Pimpinelli F, Venuti A, Pellini R. It is time to improve the diagnostic workup of oropharyngeal cancer with circulating tumor HPV DNA: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck 2023; 45:2945-2954. [PMID: 37715656 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The possibility of detecting circulating tumor HPV DNA (ctHPVDNA) in plasma in patients with oropharyngeal cancer has been demonstrated in several reports. However, these data are from small cohorts and available tests for detection of ctHPVDNA are not fully validated. The aim is to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ctHPVDNA by ddPCR to define its efficacy in the clinical setting for the diagnosis of HPV + OPSCC. A comprehensive search of three different databases: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. A total of 998 patients were evaluated from the 13 studies. OPSSC p16+ were 729, while controls p16- were 269. The meta-analytic study estimated the diagnostic performance of ctHPVDNA as follows: pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82-0.94) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.85-0.98), respectively; positive and negative likelihood ratios of 12.6 (95% CI: 4.9-32.1) and 0.05 (95% CI: 0.02-0.13), respectively. ddPCR for ctHPVDNA has good accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for diagnosis of HPV + OPSCC. ctHPVDNA kinetic represents a great reliable opportunity to improve diagnostic and therapeutic management of cancer patients and could open new perspectives for understanding tumor biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Paolini
- HPV-Unit, UOSD Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
- Department of Biochemical Sciences A. Rossi Fanelli, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Flaminia Campo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Oreste Iocca
- Division of Maxillofacial Surgery, Surgical Science Department, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Valentina Manciocco
- HPV-Unit, UOSD Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Armando De Virgilio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina De Pascale
- Translational oncologic research, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Moretto
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Dalfino
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Antonello Vidiri
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Blandino
- Oncogenomic and Epigenetic Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Fulvia Pimpinelli
- Department of Microbiology and Virology, IRCCS San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Aldo Venuti
- HPV-Unit, UOSD Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| | - Raul Pellini
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO), Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chapin WJ, Till JE, Hwang WT, Eads JR, Karasic TB, O'Dwyer PJ, Schneider CJ, Teitelbaum UR, Romeo J, Black TA, Christensen TE, Redlinger Tabery C, Anderson A, Slade M, LaRiviere M, Yee SS, Reiss KA, O'Hara MH, Carpenter EL. Multianalyte Prognostic Signature Including Circulating Tumor DNA and Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2200060. [PMID: 35939771 PMCID: PMC9384952 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a poor prognosis. Multianalyte signatures, including liquid biopsy and traditional clinical variables, have shown promise for improving prognostication in other solid tumors but have not yet been rigorously assessed for PDAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a prospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) or metastatic PDAC (mPDAC) who were planned to undergo systemic therapy. We collected peripheral blood before systemic therapy and assessed circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA concentration (cfDNA), and circulating tumor KRAS (ctKRAS)-variant allele fraction (VAF). Association of variables with overall survival (OS) was assessed in univariate and multivariate survival analysis, and comparisons were made between models containing liquid biopsy variables combined with traditional clinical prognostic variables versus models containing traditional clinical prognostic variables alone. RESULTS One hundred four patients, 40 with LAPC and 64 with mPDAC, were enrolled. CTCs, cfDNA concentration, and ctKRAS VAF were all significantly higher in patients with mPDAC than patients with LAPC. ctKRAS VAF (cube root; 0.05 unit increments; hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.21; P = .01), and CTCs ≥ 1/mL (hazard ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.69; P = .002) were significantly associated with worse OS in multivariate analysis while cfDNA concentration was not. A model selected by backward selection containing traditional clinical variables plus liquid biopsy variables had better discrimination of OS compared with a model containing traditional clinical variables alone (optimism-corrected Harrell's C-statistic 0.725 v 0.681). CONCLUSION A multianalyte prognostic signature containing CTCs, ctKRAS, and cfDNA concentration outperformed a model containing traditional clinical variables alone suggesting that CTCs, ctKRAS, and cfDNA provide prognostic information complementary to traditional clinical variables in advanced PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J. Chapin
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jacob E. Till
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Wei-Ting Hwang
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jennifer R. Eads
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Thomas B. Karasic
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Charles J. Schneider
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ursina R. Teitelbaum
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Janae Romeo
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Taylor A. Black
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Theresa E. Christensen
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Colleen Redlinger Tabery
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Michael LaRiviere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Stephanie S. Yee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kim A. Reiss
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark H. O'Hara
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Erica L. Carpenter
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pijnappel EN, Suurmeijer JA, Koerkamp BG, Kos M, Siveke JT, Salvia R, Ghaneh P, van Eijck CHJ, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, Abrams R, Brasiuniene B, Büchler MW, Casadei R, van Laethem JL, Berlin J, Boku N, Conroy T, Golcher H, Sinn M, Neoptolemos JP, van Tienhoven G, Besselink MG, Wilmink JW, van Laarhoven HWM. Consensus Statement on Mandatory Measurements for Pancreatic Cancer Trials for Patients With Resectable or Borderline Resectable Disease (COMM-PACT-RB): A Systematic Review and Delphi Consensus Statement. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:929-937. [PMID: 35446336 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Pancreatic cancer is the third most common cause of cancer death; however, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of survival in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer lack mandatory measures for reporting baseline and prognostic factors, which hampers comparisons between outcome measures. Objective To develop a consensus on baseline and prognostic factors to be used as mandatory measurements in RCTs of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Evidence Review We performed a systematic literature search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, and Embase for RCTs on resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with overall survival as the primary outcome. We produced a systematic summary of all baseline and prognostic factors identified in the RCTs. A Delphi panel that included 13 experts was surveyed to reach a consensus on mandatory and recommended baseline and prognostic factors. Findings The 42 RCTs that met inclusion criteria reported a total of 60 baseline and 19 prognostic factors. After 2 Delphi rounds, agreement was reached on 50 mandatory baseline and 20 mandatory prognostic factors for future RCTs, with a distinction between studies of neoadjuvant vs adjuvant treatment. Conclusion and Relevance This findings of this systematic review and international expert consensus have produced this Consensus Statement on Mandatory Measurements in Pancreatic Cancer Trials for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Disease (COMM-PACT-RB). The baseline and prognostic factors comprising the mandatory measures will facilitate better comparison across RCTs and eventually will enable improved clinical practice among patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther N Pijnappel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Annelie Suurmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Milan Kos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jens T Siveke
- Institute for Developmental Cancer Therapeutics, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
- Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, German Cancer Consortium and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Paula Ghaneh
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | - Ross Abrams
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Birute Brasiuniene
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Lithuania
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jean-Luc van Laethem
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jordan Berlin
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, US
| | - Narikazu Boku
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Thierry Conroy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Henriette Golcher
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marianne Sinn
- Charite-Universitatsmedizin Berlin, CONKO study group, Berlin, Germany
- University Medical Center of Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - John P Neoptolemos
- Department of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yang Q, Mao Y, Xie H, Qin T, Mai Z, Cai Q, Wen H, Li Y, Zhang R, Liu L. Identifying Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and RECIST Stable Disease Using Radiomics Analysis. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2100362. [PMID: 35319966 PMCID: PMC8966975 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Few studies have explored the biomarkers for predicting the heterogeneous outcomes of patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma showing stable disease (SD) on the initial postchemotherapy computed tomography. We aimed to devise a radiomics signature (RS) to predict these outcomes for further risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiuxia Yang
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yize Mao
- Department of Pancreatic-Biliary Surgical Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Xie
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tao Qin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhijun Mai
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qian Cai
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Hailin Wen
- Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shenzhen Center, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yong Li
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rong Zhang
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lizhi Liu
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ferguson SD, Fomchenko EI, Guerrieri RA, Glitza Oliva IC. Challenges and Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment of Leptomeningeal Disease (LMD). Front Oncol 2022; 11:800053. [PMID: 35096602 PMCID: PMC8789647 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.800053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating category of CNS metastasis with a very poor prognosis and limited treatment options. With maximal aggressive therapy, survival times remain short and, without treatment, prognosis is measured in weeks. Both LMD diagnosis and treatment are challenging topics within neuro-oncology. In this review, we discuss the advances in LMD diagnosis with a focus on the role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and discuss the role of targeted and immunotherapy in LMD treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherise D Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Elena I Fomchenko
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Renato A Guerrieri
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Impact of Biomarkers in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma on Diagnosis, Surveillance and Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14010217. [PMID: 35008381 PMCID: PMC8750069 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Due to the frequently late diagnosis, early metastasis and high therapy resistance curation is rare and prognosis remains poor overall. To provide early diagnostic and therapeutic predictors, various molecules from blood, tissue and other origin e.g., saliva, urine and stool, have been identified as biomarkers. This review summarizes current trends in biomarkers for diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still difficult to treat due to insufficient methods for early diagnosis and prediction of therapy response. Furthermore, surveillance after curatively intended surgery lacks adequate methods for timely detection of recurrence. Therefore, several molecules have been analyzed as predictors of recurrence or early detection of PDAC. Enhanced understanding of molecular tumorigenesis and treatment response triggered the identification of novel biomarkers as predictors for response to conventional chemotherapy or targeted therapy. In conclusion, progress has been made especially in the prediction of therapy response with biomarkers. The use of molecules for early detection and recurrence of PDAC is still at an early stage, but there are promising approaches in noninvasive biomarkers, composite panels and scores that can already ameliorate the current clinical practice. The present review summarizes the current state of research on biomarkers for diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|
9
|
van Velzen MJM, Creemers A, van den Ende T, Schokker S, Krausz S, Reinten RJ, Dijk F, van Noesel CJM, Halfwerk H, Meijer SL, Mearadji B, Derks S, Bijlsma MF, van Laarhoven HWM. Circulating tumor DNA predicts outcome in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer. Gastric Cancer 2022; 25:906-915. [PMID: 35763187 PMCID: PMC9365750 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-022-01313-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has predictive and prognostic value in localized and metastatic cancer. This study analyzed the prognostic value of baseline and on-treatment ctDNA in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer (mGEC) using a region-specific next generation sequencing (NGS) panel. METHODS Cell free DNA was isolated from plasma of patients before start of first-line palliative systemic treatment and after 9 and 18 weeks. Two NGS panels were designed comprising the most frequently mutated genes and targetable mutations in GEC. Tumor-derived mutations in matched metastatic biopsies were used to validate that the sequencing panels assessed true tumor-derived variants. Tumor volumes were calculated from baseline CT scans and correlated to variant allele frequency (VAF). Survival analyses were performed using univariable and multivariable Cox-regression analyses. RESULTS ctDNA was detected in pretreatment plasma in 75% of 72 patients and correlated well with mutations in metastatic biopsies (86% accordance). The VAF correlated with baseline tumor volume (Pearson's R 0.53, p < 0.0001). Detection of multiple gene mutations at baseline in plasma was associated with worse overall survival (OS, HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.10-4.28; p = 0.027) and progression free survival (PFS, HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.28-5.73; p = 0.009). OS and PFS were inferior in patients with residual detectable ctDNA after 9 weeks of treatment (OS: HR 4.95, 95% CI 1.53-16.04; p = 0.008; PFS: HR 4.08, 95% CI 1.31-12.75; p = 0.016). CONCLUSION Based on our NGS panel, the number of ctDNA mutations before start of first-line chemotherapy has prognostic value. Moreover, residual ctDNA after three cycles of systemic treatment is associated with inferior survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel J. M. van Velzen
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aafke Creemers
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.7177.60000000084992262Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tom van den Ende
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandor Schokker
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah Krausz
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roy J. Reinten
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike Dijk
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carel J. M. van Noesel
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Halfwerk
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sybren L. Meijer
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Banafsche Mearadji
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah Derks
- grid.12380.380000 0004 1754 9227Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten F. Bijlsma
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.12380.380000 0004 1754 9227Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Spoor J, Eyck BM, Atmodimedjo PN, Jansen MPHM, Helmijr JCA, Martens JWM, van der Wilk BJ, van Lanschot JJB, Dinjens WNM. Liquid biopsy in esophageal cancer: a case report of false-positive circulating tumor DNA detection due to clonal hematopoiesis. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:1264. [PMID: 34532401 PMCID: PMC8421960 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is a promising non-invasive technique for active surveillance after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced resectable esophageal carcinoma. In other malignancies false-positive results in ctDNA analysis have been reported due to clonal hematopoiesis. In this case, we present a 66-year-old male who had adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction for which he received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and underwent a transhiatal esophagectomy. Postoperatively our patient received follow-up with ctDNA analysis using next generation sequencing (NGS) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). This case report illustrates a number of the current challenges in ctDNA diagnostics in esophageal carcinoma. Firstly, the TP53 c.524G>A; p.R175H mutation that was found in preoperative tumor biopsies became detectable in ctDNA only after distant metastases had already been confirmed by clinical symptoms and standard imaging- and biopsy techniques. Secondly our patient repeatedly had false-positive outcomes of ctDNA analysis. Genomic analysis of white blood cells revealed that the origin of these discordant mutations lies in clonal hematopoiesis. Failure to detect TP53 c.524G>A; p.R175H in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is most likely due to the amount of ctDNA in the cfDNA fraction being below the limit of detection for NGS and ddPCR analyses. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of finding mutations originating from clonal hematopoiesis when using ctDNA analysis during active surveillance for esophageal carcinoma. We recommend correlation of mutations in cfDNA with mutations in tumor biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Spoor
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben M Eyck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peggy N Atmodimedjo
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice P H M Jansen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jean C A Helmijr
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berend J van der Wilk
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Jan B van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Winand N M Dinjens
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chidambaram S, Markar SR. Clinical utility and applicability of circulating tumor DNA testing in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 2021; 35:6324875. [PMID: 34286823 PMCID: PMC8832526 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is an aggressive malignancy with a relatively poor prognosis even after multimodality therapy. Currently, patients undergo a series of investigations that can be invasive and costly or pose secondary risks to their health. In other malignancies, liquid biopsies of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are used in clinical practice for diagnostic and surveillance purposes. This systematic review summarizes the latest evidence for the clinical applicability of ctDNA technology in esophageal cancer. A systematic review of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Review and Scopus databases. Articles were evaluated for the use of ctDNA for diagnosis and monitoring of patients with esophageal cancer. Quality assessment of studies was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of sequencing methodologies. We included 15 studies that described the use of ctDNA technology in the qualitative synthesis and eight studies involving 414 patients in the quantitative analysis. Of these, four studies assessed its utility in cancer diagnosis, while four studies evaluated its use for prognosis and monitoring. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for diagnostic studies were 71.0% (55.7-82.6%) and 98.6% (33.9-99.9%), while the pooled sensitivity and specificity for surveillance purposes were 48.9% (29.4-68.8%) and 95.5% (90.6-97.9%). ctDNA technology is an acceptable method for diagnosis and monitoring with a moderate sensitivity and high specificity that is enhanced in combination with current imaging methods. Further work should demonstrate the practical integration of ctDNA in the diagnostic and surveillance clinical pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swathikan Chidambaram
- Address correspondence to: Sheraz R. Markar, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Academic Surgical Unit, 10th Floor QEQM, St Mary’s Hospital, South Wharf Road, London W2 1NY, UK.
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang S, Zheng Y, Yang F, Zhu L, Zhu XQ, Wang ZF, Wu XL, Zhou CH, Yan JY, Hu BY, Kong B, Fu DL, Bruns C, Zhao Y, Qin LX, Dong QZ. The molecular biology of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: translational challenges and clinical perspectives. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2021; 6:249. [PMID: 34219130 PMCID: PMC8255319 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-021-00659-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is an increasingly common cause of cancer mortality with a tight correspondence between disease mortality and incidence. Furthermore, it is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage with a very dismal prognosis. Due to the high heterogeneity, metabolic reprogramming, and dense stromal environment associated with pancreatic cancer, patients benefit little from current conventional therapy. Recent insight into the biology and genetics of pancreatic cancer has supported its molecular classification, thus expanding clinical therapeutic options. In this review, we summarize how the biological features of pancreatic cancer and its metabolic reprogramming as well as the tumor microenvironment regulate its development and progression. We further discuss potential biomarkers for pancreatic cancer diagnosis, prediction, and surveillance based on novel liquid biopsies. We also outline recent advances in defining pancreatic cancer subtypes and subtype-specific therapeutic responses and current preclinical therapeutic models. Finally, we discuss prospects and challenges in the clinical development of pancreatic cancer therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shun Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Cancer Metastasis Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Cancer Metastasis Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Yang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Institute, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Le Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Cancer Metastasis Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Qiang Zhu
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Zhe-Fang Wang
- General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Xiao-Lin Wu
- General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Cheng-Hui Zhou
- General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jia-Yan Yan
- General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bei-Yuan Hu
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Cancer Metastasis Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bo Kong
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - De-Liang Fu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Institute, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Christiane Bruns
- General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Yue Zhao
- General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Lun-Xiu Qin
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Cancer Metastasis Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Qiong-Zhu Dong
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Cancer Metastasis Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- Key laboratory of whole-period monitoring and precise intervention of digestive cancer, Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (SMHC), Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Smithy JW, O'Reilly EM. Pancreas cancer: Therapeutic trials in metastatic disease. J Surg Oncol 2021; 123:1475-1488. [PMID: 33831245 PMCID: PMC8606164 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a major cause of cancer-related mortality in 2021. Cytotoxic therapies are the therapeutic mainstay for PDAC. The recent approval of olaparib as maintenance therapy for germline BRCA1/2-mutated PDAC and pembrolizumab for mismatch repair deficient PDAC represent molecularly targeted approaches for this disease. Investigational therapeutic strategies include targeting the stroma, metabolism, tumor microenvironment, and the immune system, and selected approaches are reviewed herein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W Smithy
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li J, Li Z, Ding Y, Xu Y, Zhu X, Cao N, Huang C, Qin M, Liu F, Zhao A. TP53 mutation and MET amplification in circulating tumor DNA analysis predict disease progression in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PeerJ 2021; 9:e11146. [PMID: 33959414 PMCID: PMC8054733 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gastric cancer (GC) is a heterogeneous disease that encompasses various molecular subtypes. The molecular mutation characteristics of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC), especially the clinical utility of TP53 mutation and MET amplification in ctDNA need to be further explored. Objectives The aim of this study was mainly to assess the clinical utility of TP53 mutation and MET amplification in ctDNA as biomarkers for monitoring disease progression of AGC. Patients and Methods We used multigene NGS-panel technology to study the characteristics of ctDNA gene mutations and screen the key mutant genes in AGC patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival probability and log-rank test was used to compare the survival curves of TP53 mutation and MET amplification in ctDNA of AGC patients. The survival time was set from the blood test time to the follow-up time to observe the relationship between the monitoring index and tumor prognosis. Results We performed mutation detection on ctDNA in 23 patients with AGC and identified the top 20 mutant genes. The five most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (55%), EGFR (20%), ERBB2 (20%), MET (15%) and APC (10%). TP53 was the most common mutated gene (55%) and MET had a higher frequency of mutations (15%) in our study. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with TP53 mutant in ctDNA had shorter overall survival (OS) than these with TP53 wild (P < 0.001). The Allele frequency (AF) of TP53 mutations in patient number 1 was higher in the second time (0.94%) than in the first time (0.36%); the AF of TP53 mutations in patient number 16 was from scratch (0∼0.26%). In addition, the AF of TP53 mutations in patients who survive was relatively low (P = 0.047). Simultaneously, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with MET amplification also had shorter OS than these with MET without amplification (P < 0.001). Conclusion TP53 and MET are the two common frequently mutant genes in ctDNA of AGC patients.TP53 mutation and MET amplification in ctDNA could predict disease progression of AGC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Li
- Department of Oncology, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Shanghai, China.,Department of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Zhaoyan Li
- Department of Oncology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Shanghai, China
| | - Yajie Ding
- Department of Oncology, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Xu
- Department of Oncology, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaohong Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Shanghai, China
| | - Nida Cao
- Department of Oncology, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Shanghai, China
| | - Chen Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengmeng Qin
- Department of Oncology, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Liu
- Department of Oncology, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Shanghai, China
| | - Aiguang Zhao
- Department of Oncology, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Strijker M, van Veldhuisen E, van der Geest LG, Busch OR, Bijlsma MF, Haj Mohammad N, Homs MY, van Hooft JE, Verheij J, de Vos-Geelen J, Wilmink JW, Steyerberg WEW, Besselink MG, van Laarhoven HW. Readily available biomarkers predict poor survival in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Biomarkers 2021; 26:325-334. [PMID: 33663300 DOI: 10.1080/1354750x.2021.1893814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identification of metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) patients with the worst prognosis could help to tailor therapy. We evaluated readily available biomarkers for the prediction of 90-day mortality in a nationwide cohort of mPC patients. METHODS Patients with synchronous mPC were included from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (2015-2017). Baseline CA19-9, albumin, CRP, LDH, CRP/albumin ratio, and (modified) Glasgow Prognostic Score ((m)GPS composed of albumin and CRP) were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of 90-day mortality. Prognostic value per predictor was quantified by Nagelkerke's partial R2. RESULTS Overall, 4248 patients were included. Median overall survival was 2.2 months and 90-day mortality was 59.4% (n = 1629). All biomarkers predicted 90-day mortality in univariable analysis, and remained statistically significant after adjustment for clinically relevant factors and all other biomarkers (all p < 0.001). The prognostic value of the biomarkers combined was similar to WHO performance status. Patients who received chemotherapy had better outcomes than those who did not, regardless of biomarker levels. CONCLUSIONS In mPC patients, albumin, CA19-9, CRP, LDH, CRP/albumin ratio, and (m)GPS are prognostic for poor survival. Biomarkers did not predict response to chemotherapy. These readily available biomarkers can be used to better inform patients and to stratify in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marin Strijker
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eran van Veldhuisen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lydia G van der Geest
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten F Bijlsma
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Y Homs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne Verheij
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tan X, Yan H, Chen L, Zhang Y, Sun C. Clinical Value of ctDNA in Hematological Malignancies (Lymphomas, Multiple Myeloma, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, and Leukemia): A Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:632910. [PMID: 33747954 PMCID: PMC7970179 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.632910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has offered a minimally invasive approach for the detection and measurement of cancer. However, its diagnostic and prognostic value in hematological malignancies remains unclear. Materials and methods: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for relating literature. Diagnostic accuracy variables and disease progression prediction data were pooled by the Meta-Disc version 1.4 software. Review Manager version 5.4 software was applied for prognostic data analysis. Results: A total of 11 studies met our inclusion criteria. In terms of diagnosis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.51 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.38–0.64) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.88–1.00), respectively. The AUSROC (area under the SROC) curve was 0.89 (95%CI 0.75–1.03). When it comes to the prediction of disease progression, the overall sensitivity and specificity was 0.83 (95% CI 0.67–0.94) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.93–1.00), respectively. Moreover, a significant association also existed between the presence of ctDNA and worse progression-free survival (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.27–5.43, p = 0.009), as well as overall survival (HR 2.92, 95% CI 1.53–5.57, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The use of ctDNA in clinical practice for hematological malignancies is promising, as it may not only contribute to diagnosis, but could also predict the prognosis of patients so as to guide treatment. In the future, more studies are needed to realize the standardization of sequencing techniques and improve the detection sensitivity of exploration methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangyu Tan
- Department of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Han Yan
- Department of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yuyang Zhang
- Department of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Chunyan Sun
- Department of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wallander K, Eisfeldt J, Lindblad M, Nilsson D, Billiau K, Foroughi H, Nordenskjöld M, Liedén A, Tham E. Cell-free tumour DNA analysis detects copy number alterations in gastro-oesophageal cancer patients. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0245488. [PMID: 33539436 PMCID: PMC7861431 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Analysis of cell-free tumour DNA, a liquid biopsy, is a promising biomarker for cancer. We have performed a proof-of principle study to test the applicability in the clinical setting, analysing copy number alterations (CNAs) in plasma and tumour tissue from 44 patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer. METHODS DNA was isolated from blood plasma and a tissue sample from each patient. Array-CGH was applied to the tissue DNA. The cell-free plasma DNA was sequenced by low-coverage whole-genome sequencing using a clinical pipeline for non-invasive prenatal testing. WISECONDOR and ichorCNA, two bioinformatic tools, were used to process the output data and were compared to each other. RESULTS Cancer-associated CNAs could be seen in 59% (26/44) of the tissue biopsies. In the plasma samples, a targeted approach analysing 61 regions of special interest in gastro-oesophageal cancer detected cancer-associated CNAs with a z-score >5 in 11 patients. Broadening the analysis to a whole-genome view, 17/44 patients (39%) had cancer-associated CNAs using WISECONDOR and 13 (30%) using ichorCNA. Of the 26 patients with tissue-verified cancer-associated CNAs, 14 (54%) had corresponding CNAs in plasma. Potentially clinically actionable amplifications overlapping the genes VEGFA, EGFR and FGFR2 were detected in the plasma from three patients. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that low-coverage whole-genome sequencing without prior knowledge of the tumour alterations could become a useful tool for cell-free tumour DNA analysis of total CNAs in plasma from patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Wallander
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jesper Eisfeldt
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mats Lindblad
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Daniel Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kenny Billiau
- Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hassan Foroughi
- Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Nordenskjöld
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Agne Liedén
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Emma Tham
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zheng-Lin B, O'Reilly EM. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the era of precision medicine. Semin Oncol 2021; 48:19-33. [PMID: 33637355 PMCID: PMC8355264 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2021.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The paradigm for treatment of PDAC is shifting from a "one size fits all" of cytotoxic therapy to a precision medicine approach based on specific predictive biomarkers for a subset of patients. As the genomic landscape of pancreatic carcinogenesis has become increasingly defined, several oncogenic alterations have emerged as actionable targets and their use has been validated in novel approaches such as targeting mutated germline DNA damage response genes (BRCA) and mismatch deficiency (dMMR/MSI-H) or blockade of rare somatic oncogenic fusions. Chemotherapy selection based on transcriptomic subtypes and developing stroma- and immune-modulating strategies have yielded encouraging results and may open therapeutic refinement to a broader PDAC population. Notwithstanding, a series of negative late-stage trials over the last year continue to underscore the inherent challenges in the treatment of PDAC. Multifactorial therapy resistance warrants further exploration in PDAC "omics" and tumor-stroma-immune cells crosstalk. Herein, we discuss precision medicine approaches applied to the treatment of PDAC, its current state and future perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binbin Zheng-Lin
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Morningside and Mount Sinai West, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pang TCY, Po JW, Becker TM, Goldstein D, Pirola RC, Wilson JS, Apte MV. Circulating tumour cells in pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinicopathological implications. Pancreatology 2021; 21:103-114. [PMID: 33309014 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The detection and quantification of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in pancreatic cancer (PC) has the potential to provide prognostic information. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of the literature surrounding CTCs in PC. METHODS A systematic literature review on CTCs in PC between 2005-2020 was performed. Data based on peripheral vein samples were used to determine the positivity rate of CTCs, their prognostic significance and their relative numbers compared to portal vein (PV) samples. RESULTS The overall CTC detection rate in forty-four articles was 65% (95%CI: 55-75%). Detection rate for CellSearch was 26% (95%CI: 14-38%), which was lower than for both filtration and microfluidic techniques. In nine studies with >50 patients, overall survival was worse with CTC positivity (HR 1.82; 95%CI: 1.61-2.05). Five of seven studies which described PV CTC collection provided patient-level data. PV CTC yield was 7.7-fold (95%CI 1.35-43.9) that of peripheral blood. CONCLUSIONS CTCs were detected in the peripheral circulation of most patients with PC and may be related to prognosis and disease stage. PV blood contains more CTCs than peripheral blood sampling. This review points to the maturation of techniques of CTC enrichment, and its evidence base for eventual clinical deployment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony C Y Pang
- Pancreatic Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia; Surgical Innovations Unit, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia
| | - Joseph W Po
- Centre for Circulating Tumour Cell Diagnostics and Research, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Australia; Surgical Innovations Unit, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia
| | - Therese M Becker
- Centre for Circulating Tumour Cell Diagnostics and Research, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Australia
| | - David Goldstein
- Pancreatic Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Romano C Pirola
- Pancreatic Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeremy S Wilson
- Pancreatic Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Minoti V Apte
- Pancreatic Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gandini S, Zanna I, De Angelis SP, Cocorocchio E, Queirolo P, Lee JH, Carlino MS, Mazzarella L, Achutti Duso B, Palli D, Raimondi S, Caini S. Circulating tumour DNA and melanoma survival: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 157:103187. [PMID: 33276181 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
We reviewed and meta-analysed the available evidence (until December 2019) about circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) levels and melanoma patients survival. We included twenty-six studies (>2000 patients overall), which included mostly stage III-IV cutaneous melanoma patients and differed widely in terms of systemic therapy received and somatic mutations that were searched. Patients with detectable ctDNA before treatment had worse progression-free survival (PFS) (summary hazard ratio (SHR) 2.47, 95 % confidence intervals (CI) 1.85-3.29) and overall survival (OS) (SHR 2.98, 95 % CI 2.26-3.92), with no difference by tumour stage. ctDNA detectability during follow-up was associated with poorer PFS (SHR 4.27, 95 %CI 2.75-6.63) and OS (SHR 3.91, 95 %CI 1.97-7.78); in the latter case, the association was stronger (p = 0.01) for stage IV vs. III melanomas. Between-estimates heterogeneity was low for all pooled estimates. ctDNA is a strong prognostic biomarker for advanced-stage melanoma patients, robust across tumour (e.g. genomic profile) and patients (e.g. systemic therapy) characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Gandini
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ines Zanna
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Simone Pietro De Angelis
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Emilia Cocorocchio
- Division of Medical Oncology of Melanoma, Sarcoma and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Queirolo
- Division of Medical Oncology of Melanoma, Sarcoma and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Jenny H Lee
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Melanoma Institute of Australia and the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Luca Mazzarella
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Bruno Achutti Duso
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Domenico Palli
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Sara Raimondi
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Saverio Caini
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
van der Wilk BJ, Eyck BM, Doukas M, Spaander MCW, Schoon EJ, Krishnadath KK, Oostenbrug LE, Lagarde SM, Wijnhoven BPL, Looijenga LHJ, Biermann K, van Lanschot JJB. Residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer: locations undetected by endoscopic biopsies in the preSANO trial. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1791-1800. [PMID: 32757307 PMCID: PMC7689829 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Active surveillance has been proposed for patients with oesophageal cancer in whom there is a complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). However, endoscopic biopsies have limited negative predictive value in detecting residual disease. This study determined the location of residual tumour following surgery to improve surveillance and endoscopic strategies. Methods The present study was based on patients who participated in the prospective preSANO trial with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction treated in four Dutch hospitals between 2013 and 2016. Resection specimens and endoscopic biopsies taken during clinical response evaluations after nCRT were reviewed by two expert gastrointestinal pathologists. The exact location of residual disease in the oesophageal wall was determined in resection specimens. Endoscopic biopsies were assessed for the presence of structures representing the submucosal layer of the oesophageal wall. Results In total, 119 eligible patients underwent clinical response evaluations after nCRT followed by standard surgery. Residual tumour was present in endoscopic biopsies from 70 patients, confirmed on histological analysis of the resected organ. Residual tumour was present in the resection specimen from 27 of the other 49 patients, despite endoscopic biopsies being negative. Of these 27 patients, residual tumour was located in the mucosa in 18, and in the submucosa beneath tumour‐free mucosa in eight. One patient had tumour in muscle beneath tumour‐free mucosa and submucosa. Conclusion Most residual disease after nCRT missed by endoscopic biopsies was located in the mucosa. Active surveillance could be improved by more sampling and considering submucosal biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - B M Eyck
- Departments of Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Doukas
- Pathology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M C W Spaander
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E J Schoon
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - K K Krishnadath
- Amsterdam University Medical Centres - location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cancer Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - S M Lagarde
- Departments of Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - L H J Looijenga
- Pathology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Princess Maxima Centre for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chen L, Chen Y, Feng YL, Zhu Y, Wang LQ, Hu S, Cheng P. Tumor circulome in the liquid biopsies for digestive tract cancer diagnosis and prognosis. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8:2066-2080. [PMID: 32548136 PMCID: PMC7281040 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i11.2066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Digestive tract cancer is one of the main diseases that endanger human health. At present, the early diagnosis of digestive tract tumors mainly depends on serology, imaging, endoscopy, and so on. Although tissue specimens are the gold standard for cancer diagnosis, with the rapid development of precision medicine in cancer, the demand for dynamic monitoring of tumor molecular characteristics has increased. Liquid biopsy involves the collection of body fluids via non-invasive approaches, and analyzes biological markers such as circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA, circulating cell-free DNA, microRNAs, and exosomes. In recent years, liquid biopsy has become more and more important in the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer in clinical practice due to its convenience, non-invasiveness, high specificity and it overcomes temporal-spatial heterogeneity. Therefore, this review summarizes the current evidence on liquid biopsies in digestive tract cancers in relation to diagnosis and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Chen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 310014, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yu Chen
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou 511400, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yuan-Ling Feng
- Department of Obstetrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310052, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yan Zhu
- Department of Respiratory, Shulan Hospital, Hangzhou 310004, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Li-Quan Wang
- Department of Obstetrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310052, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Shen Hu
- Department of Obstetrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310052, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Pu Cheng
- Department of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310052, Zhejiang Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Tumor Microenvironment and Immune Therapy of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310052, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Liquid Biopsy Serial Monitoring of Treatment Responses and Relapse in Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12061352. [PMID: 32466419 PMCID: PMC7352685 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Early predictive markers to track treatment responses are needed for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. We examined the prognostication and risk stratification role of liquid biopsy serial monitoring for this deadly cancer. (2) Methods: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) were isolated from 60 ESCC patients treated by chemotherapy (CT) at five serial timepoints: baseline (CTC1/cfDNA1), CT pre-cycle III (CTC2/cfDNA2), CT post-cycle IV, end of CT and relapse. (3) Results: In 45/57 ESCC patients with evaluable CTC counts at CT pre-cycle III, positive CTC2 (≥3 CTCs) is independently associated with response at interim reassessment and progression-free survival (PFS) in multivariate analysis. In 42/57 ESCC patients with changes of CTC1/CTC2 and cfDNA1/cfDNA2, patients categorized into four risk groups based on the number of favorable and unfavorable changes of CTC1/CTC2 and cfDNA1/cfDNA2, were independently associated with overall survival (OS) by multivariate analysis. (4) Conclusions: CTC counts at pre-cycle III are independently associated with response at interim reassessment and PFS. Combined changes of CTC counts and cfDNA levels from baseline to pre-cycle III are independently associated with OS. Longitudinal liquid biopsy serial monitoring provides complementary information for prediction and prognosis for CT responses in advanced ESCC.
Collapse
|
24
|
Dell'Aquila E, Fulgenzi CAM, Minelli A, Citarella F, Stellato M, Pantano F, Russano M, Cursano MC, Napolitano A, Zeppola T, Vincenzi B, Tonini G, Santini D. Prognostic and predictive factors in pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget 2020; 11:924-941. [PMID: 32206189 PMCID: PMC7075465 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Its high mortality rate has remained unchanged for years. Radiotherapy and surgery are considered standard treatments in early and locally advanced stages. Chemotherapy is the only option for metastatic patients. Two treatment regimens, i. e. the association of 5-fluorouracil- irinotecan-oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) and the association of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine, have been shown to improve outcomes for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. However, there are not standardized predictive biomarkers able to identify patients who benefit most from treatments. CA19-9 is the most studied prognostic biomarker, its predictive role remains unclear. Other clinical, histological and molecular biomarkers are emerging in prognostic and predictive settings. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of prognostic and predictive markers used in clinical practice and to explore the most promising fields of research in terms of treatment selection and tailored therapy in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alessandro Minelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome 00128, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Citarella
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome 00128, Italy
| | - Marco Stellato
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome 00128, Italy
| | - Francesco Pantano
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome 00128, Italy
| | - Marco Russano
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome 00128, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Napolitano
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome 00128, Italy
| | - Tea Zeppola
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome 00128, Italy
| | - Bruno Vincenzi
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome 00128, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome 00128, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome 00128, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Preoperative detection of KRAS G12D mutation in ctDNA is a powerful predictor for early recurrence of resectable PDAC patients. Br J Cancer 2020; 122:857-867. [PMID: 31969677 PMCID: PMC7078253 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0704-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background About 25–37% of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) had a great chance of early recurrence after radical resection, which is mainly due to preoperative micrometastasis. We herein demonstrated the profiles of ctDNA in resectable PDAC and use of ctDNA to identify patients with potential micrometastasis. Methods A total of 113 and 44 resectable PDACs were enrolled in discovery and validation cohorts, separately. A panel containing 50 genes was used to screen ctDNA by an NGS-based assessment with high specificity. Results In the discovery cohort, the overall detection rate was 38.05% (43/113). Among positive ctDNA, KRAS mutation had the highest detection rate (23.01%, 26/113), while the others were <5%. Survival analysis showed that plasma KRAS mutations, especially KRAS G12D mutation, had significant association with OS and RFS of resectable PDAC. Plasma KRAS G12D mutation showed a strong correlation with early distant metastasis. In the validation cohort, survival analysis showed similar association between plasma KRAS G12D mutation and poor outcomes. Conclusions This study demonstrated that plasma KRAS mutations, especially KRAS G12D mutation, served as a useful predictive biomarker for prognosis of resectable PDAC. More importantly, due to high correlation with micrometastasis, preoperative detection of plasma KRAS G12D mutation helps in optimising surgical selection of resectable PDAC.
Collapse
|
26
|
Defining and Predicting Early Recurrence in 957 Patients With Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2020; 269:1154-1162. [PMID: 31082915 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 217] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To establish an evidence-based cut-off to differentiate between early and late recurrence and to compare clinicopathologic risk factors between the two groups. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA A clear definition of "early recurrence" after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resection is currently lacking. METHODS Patients undergoing pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma between 2000 and 2013 were included. Exclusion criteria were neoadjuvant therapy and incomplete follow-up. A minimum P-value approach was used to evaluate the optimal cut-off value of recurrence-free survival to divide the patients into early and late recurrence cohorts based on subsequent prognosis. Potential risk factors for early recurrence were assessed with logistic regression models. RESULTS Of 957 included patients, 204 (21.3%) were recurrence-free at last follow-up. The optimal length of recurrence-free survival to distinguish between early (n = 388, 51.5%) and late recurrence (n = 365, 48.5%) was 12 months (P < 0.001). Patients with early recurrence had 1-, and 2-year post-recurrence survival rates of 20 and 6% compared with 45 and 22% for the late recurrence group (both P < 0.001). Preoperative risk factors for early recurrence included a Charlson age-comorbidity index ≥4 (OR 1.65), tumor size > 3.0 cm on computed tomography (OR 1.53) and CA 19-9 > 210 U/mL (OR 2.30). Postoperative risk factors consisted of poor tumor differentiation grade (OR 1.66), microscopic lymphovascular invasion (OR 1.70), a lymph node ratio > 0.2 (OR 2.49), and CA 19-9 > 37 U/mL (OR 3.38). Adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 0.28) and chemoradiotherapy (OR 0.29) were associated with a reduced likelihood of early recurrence. CONCLUSION A recurrence-free interval of 12 months is the optimal threshold for differentiating between early and late recurrence, based on subsequent prognosis.
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhao Y, He JY, Zou YL, Guo XS, Cui JZ, Guo L, Bu H. Evaluating the cerebrospinal fluid ctDNA detection by next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of meningeal Carcinomatosis. BMC Neurol 2019; 19:331. [PMID: 31856745 PMCID: PMC6924020 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-019-1554-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Meningeal carcinomatosis (MC) is the most severe form of brain metastasis and causes significant morbidity and mortality. Currently, the diagnosis of MC is routinely confirmed on the basis of clinical manifestation, positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology, and/or neuroimaging features. However, negative rate of CSF cytology and neuroimaging findings often result in a failure to diagnose MC from the patients who actually have the disease. Here we evaluate the CSF circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the diagnosis of MC. Methods A total of 35 CSF samples were collected from 35 patients with MC for CSF cytology examination, CSF ctDNA extraction and cancer-associated gene mutations detection by next-generation sequencing (NGS) at the same time. Results The most frequent primary tumor in this study was lung cancer (26/35, 74%), followed by gastric cancer (2/35, 6%), breast cancer (2/35, 6%), prostatic cancer (1/35, 3%), parotid gland carcinoma (1/35, 3%) and lymphoma (1/35, 3%) while no primary tumor could be found in the remaining 2 patients in spite of using various inspection methods. Twenty-five CSF samples (25/35; 71%) were found neoplastic cells in CSF cytology examination while all of the 35 CSF samples (35/35; 100%) were revealed having detectable ctDNA in which cancer-associated gene mutations were detected. All of 35 patients with MC in the study underwent contrast-enhanced brain MRI and/or CT and 22 neuroimaging features (22/35; 63%) were consistent with MC. The sensitivity of the neuroimaging was 88% (95% confidence intervals [95% CI], 75 to 100) (p = 22/25) and 63% (95% CI, 47 to 79) (p = 22/35) compared to those of CSF cytology and CSF ctDNA, respectively. The sensitivity of the CSF cytology was 71% (95% CI, 56 to 86) (n = 25/35) compared to that of CSF ctDNA. Conclusions This study suggests a higher sensitivity of CSF ctDNA than those of CSF cytology and neuroimaging findings. We find cancer-associated gene mutations in ctDNA from CSF of patients with MC at 100% of our cohort, and utilizing CSF ctDNA as liquid biopsy technology based on the detection of cancer-associated gene mutations may give additional information to diagnose MC with negative CSF cytology and/or negative neuroimaging findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Zhao
- Department of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 215 Heping West Road, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China
| | - Jun-Ying He
- Department of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 215 Heping West Road, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China
| | - Yue-Li Zou
- Department of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 215 Heping West Road, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China
| | - Xiao-Su Guo
- Department of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 215 Heping West Road, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China
| | - Jun-Zhao Cui
- Department of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 215 Heping West Road, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China
| | - Li Guo
- Department of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 215 Heping West Road, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China.
| | - Hui Bu
- Department of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 215 Heping West Road, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
|
29
|
Strijker M, Soer EC, de Pastena M, Creemers A, Balduzzi A, Beagan JJ, Busch OR, van Delden OM, Halfwerk H, van Hooft JE, van Lienden KP, Marchegiani G, Meijer SL, van Noesel CJ, Reinten RJ, Roos E, Schokker S, Verheij J, van de Vijver MJ, Waasdorp C, Wilmink JW, Ylstra B, Besselink MG, Bijlsma MF, Dijk F, van Laarhoven HW. Circulating tumor DNA quantity is related to tumor volume and both predict survival in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer 2019; 146:1445-1456. [PMID: 31340061 PMCID: PMC7004068 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is assumed to reflect tumor burden and has been suggested as a tool for prognostication and follow‐up in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). However, the prognostic value of ctDNA and its relation with tumor burden has yet to be substantiated, especially in mPDAC. In this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected samples, cell‐free DNA from plasma samples of 58 treatment‐naive mPDAC patients was isolated and sequenced using a custom‐made pancreatobiliary NGS panel. Pathogenic mutations were detected in 26/58 (44.8%) samples. Cross‐check with droplet digital PCR showed good agreement in Bland–Altman analysis (p = 0.217, nonsignificance indicating good agreement). In patients with liver metastases, ctDNA was more frequently detected (24/37, p < 0.001). Tumor volume (3D reconstructions from imaging) and ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) were correlated (Spearman's ρ = 0.544, p < 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) was 3.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6–4.9) versus 8.4 (95% CI 1.6–15.1) months in patients with detectable versus undetectable ctDNA (p = 0.005). Both ctDNA VAF and tumor volume independently predicted OS after adjustment for carbohydrate antigen 19.9 and treatment regimen (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, 95% CI 1.01–1.09, p = 0.005; HR 1.00, 95% CI 1.01–1.05, p = 0.003). In conclusion, our study showed that ctDNA detection rates are higher in patients with larger tumor volume and liver metastases. Nevertheless, measurements may diverge and, thus, can provide complementary information. Both ctDNA VAF and tumor volume were strong predictors of OS. What's new? Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) attracts much interest as a possible prognostic tool for cancer. Here, the authors showed that the quantity of ctDNA correlated strongly with tumor volume in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). They conducted a retrospective analysis using samples collected from 58 untreated mPDAC patients. For this study, the authors designed a pancreatobiliary NGS panel, which they used to test the patients’ cell‐free DNA, along with droplet digital PCR. Both ctDNA variant allele frequency and tumor volume predicted overall survival, they found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marin Strijker
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eline C Soer
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matteo de Pastena
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Aafke Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto Balduzzi
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Jamie J Beagan
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Halfwerk
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Sybren L Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carel J van Noesel
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roy J Reinten
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Roos
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandor Schokker
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne Verheij
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc J van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cynthia Waasdorp
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bauke Ylstra
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten F Bijlsma
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike Dijk
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lee J, Park SS, Lee YK, Norton JA, Jeffrey SS. Liquid biopsy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: current status of circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA. Mol Oncol 2019; 13:1623-1650. [PMID: 31243883 PMCID: PMC6670020 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Reliable biomarkers are required to evaluate and manage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA are shed into blood and can be relatively easily obtained from minimally invasive liquid biopsies for serial assays and characterization, thereby providing a unique potential for early diagnosis, forecasting disease prognosis, and monitoring of therapeutic response. In this review, we provide an overview of current technologies used to detect circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA and describe recent advances regarding the multiple clinical applications of liquid biopsy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jee‐Soo Lee
- Department of Laboratory MedicineHallym University Sacred Heart HospitalAnyangKorea
- Department of Laboratory MedicineSeoul National University College of MedicineSeoulKorea
| | - Sung Sup Park
- Department of Laboratory MedicineSeoul National University College of MedicineSeoulKorea
| | - Young Kyung Lee
- Department of Laboratory MedicineHallym University Sacred Heart HospitalAnyangKorea
- Department of Laboratory MedicineHallym University College of MedicineAnyangKorea
| | - Jeffrey A. Norton
- Department of SurgeryStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Daamen LA, Groot VP, Intven MPW, Besselink MG, Busch OR, Koerkamp BG, Mohammad NH, Hermans JJ, van Laarhoven HWM, Nuyttens JJ, Wilmink JW, van Santvoort HC, Molenaar IQ, Stommel MWJ. Postoperative surveillance of pancreatic cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1770-1777. [PMID: 31204168 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.05.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Revised: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to collect the best available evidence for diagnostic modalities, frequency, and duration of surveillance after resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS PDAC guidelines published after 2015 were collected. Furthermore, a systematic search of the literature on postoperative surveillance was performed in PubMed and Embase from 2000 to 2019. Articles comparing different diagnostic modalities and frequencies of postoperative surveillance in PDAC patients with regard to survival, quality of life, morbidity and cost-effectiveness were selected. RESULTS The literature search resulted in 570 articles. A total of seven guidelines and twelve original clinical studies were eventually evaluated. PDAC guidelines increasingly recommend a combination of tumor marker testing and computed tomography (CT) imaging every three to six months during the first two years after resection. These guidelines are, however, based on expert opinion and other low-level evidence. Prospective studies comparing different surveillance strategies are lacking. According to recent studies, surveillance with tumor markers and imaging at regular intervals results in the detection of PDAC recurrence before the onset of symptoms and more frequent administration of further therapy, such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy. CONCLUSION Current evidence for recurrence-focused surveillance after PDAC resection is limited and contradictory. Consequently, recommendations on surveillance are conflicting. To define the clinical merit of recurrence-focused surveillance, patients who are most likely to benefit from early detection and treatment of PDAC recurrence need to be identified. To this purpose, well-designed prospective studies are needed, accounting for both economical and psychosocial implications of surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L A Daamen
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dept. of Radiation Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - V P Groot
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M P W Intven
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - O R Busch
- Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - N Haj Mohammad
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - J J Hermans
- Dept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - H W M van Laarhoven
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J J Nuyttens
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J W Wilmink
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H C van Santvoort
- Dept. of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - I Q Molenaar
- Dept. of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - M W J Stommel
- Dept. of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Groot VP, Mosier S, Javed AA, Teinor JA, Gemenetzis G, Ding D, Haley LM, Yu J, Burkhart RA, Hasanain A, Debeljak M, Kamiyama H, Narang A, Laheru DA, Zheng L, Lin MT, Gocke CD, Fishman EK, Hruban RH, Goggins MG, Molenaar IQ, Cameron JL, Weiss MJ, Velculescu VE, He J, Wolfgang CL, Eshleman JR. Circulating Tumor DNA as a Clinical Test in Resected Pancreatic Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:4973-4984. [PMID: 31142500 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-0197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In research settings, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) shows promise as a tumor-specific biomarker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aims to perform analytical and clinical validation of a KRAS ctDNA assay in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) and College of American Pathology-certified clinical laboratory. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Digital-droplet PCR was used to detect the major PDAC-associated somatic KRAS mutations (G12D, G12V, G12R, and Q61H) in liquid biopsies. For clinical validation, 290 preoperative and longitudinal postoperative plasma samples were collected from 59 patients with PDAC. The utility of ctDNA status to predict PDAC recurrence during follow-up was assessed. RESULTS ctDNA was detected preoperatively in 29 (49%) patients and was an independent predictor of decreased recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy were less likely to have preoperative ctDNA than were chemo-naïve patients (21% vs. 69%; P < 0.001). ctDNA levels dropped significantly after tumor resection. Persistence of ctDNA in the immediate postoperative period was associated with a high rate of recurrence and poor median RFS (5 months). ctDNA detected during follow-up predicted clinical recurrence [sensitivity 90% (95% confidence interval (CI), 74%-98%), specificity 88% (95% CI, 62%-98%)] with a median lead time of 84 days (interquartile range, 25-146). Detection of ctDNA during postpancreatectomy follow-up was associated with a median OS of 17 months, while median OS was not yet reached at 30 months for patients without ctDNA (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS Measurement of KRAS ctDNA in a CLIA laboratory setting can be used to predict recurrence and survival in patients with PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent P Groot
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stacy Mosier
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Molecular Pathology Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jonathan A Teinor
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Georgios Gemenetzis
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ding Ding
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lisa M Haley
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Molecular Pathology Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jun Yu
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Alina Hasanain
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Marija Debeljak
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Molecular Pathology Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hirohiko Kamiyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Amol Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Daniel A Laheru
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ming-Tseh Lin
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Molecular Pathology Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Christopher D Gocke
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Molecular Pathology Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Elliot K Fishman
- Department of Radiology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael G Goggins
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - John L Cameron
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Victor E Velculescu
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - James R Eshleman
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. .,Molecular Pathology Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Egyud M, Sridhar P, Devaiah A, Yamada E, Saunders S, Ståhlberg A, Filges S, Krzyzanowski PM, Kalatskaya I, Jiao W, Stein LD, Jalisi S, Godfrey TE. Plasma circulating tumor DNA as a potential tool for disease monitoring in head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2019; 41:1351-1358. [PMID: 30554450 PMCID: PMC6467749 DOI: 10.1002/hed.25563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recommendations for perioperative therapy in head and neck cancer are not explicit and recurrence occurs frequently. Circulating tumor DNA is an emerging cancer biomarker, but has not been extensively explored for detection of recurrence in head and neck cancer. METHODS Patients diagnosed with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were recruited into the study protocol. Tumors were sequenced to identify patient-specific mutations. Mutations were then identified in plasma circulating tumor DNA from pre-treatment blood samples and longitudinally during standard follow-up. Circulating tumor DNA status during follow-up was correlated to disease recurrence. RESULTS Samples were taken from eight patients. Tumor mutations were verified in seven patients. Baseline circulating tumor DNA was positive in six patients. Recurrence occurred in four patients, two of whom had detectable circulating tumor DNA prior to recurrence. CONCLUSION Circulating tumor DNA is a potential tool for disease and recurrence monitoring following curative therapy in head and neck cancer, allowing for better prognostication, and/or modification of treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Egyud
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical CenterBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Praveen Sridhar
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical CenterBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anand Devaiah
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Boston Medical CenterBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emiko Yamada
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical CenterBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stefanie Saunders
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Boston Medical CenterBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anders Ståhlberg
- Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Genetics, Institute of BiomedicineSahlgrenska Academy at University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational MedicineUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and GeneticsSahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
| | - Stefan Filges
- Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Genetics, Institute of BiomedicineSahlgrenska Academy at University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | | | | | - Wei Jiao
- Ontario Institute for Cancer ResearchTorontoOntarioCanada
| | | | - Scharukh Jalisi
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck SurgeryBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tony E. Godfrey
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical CenterBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pizzi MP, Bartelli TF, Pelosof AG, Freitas HC, Begnami MD, de Abrantes LLS, Sztokfisz C, Valieris R, Knebel FH, Coelho LGV, da Costa WL, Coimbra FJF, da Silva IT, de Amorim MG, Nunes DN, Dias-Neto E. Identification of DNA mutations in gastric washes from gastric adenocarcinoma patients: Possible implications for liquid biopsies and patient follow-up. Int J Cancer 2019; 145:1090-1098. [PMID: 30779121 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Revised: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Whereas cancer patients have benefited from liquid biopsies, the scenario for gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is still dismal. We used next-generation deep sequencing of TP53-a highly mutated and informative gene in GAC-to assess mutations in tumor biopsies, plasma (PL) and stomach fluids (gastric wash-GW). We evaluated their potential to reveal tumor-derived mutations, useful for monitoring mutational dynamics at diagnosis, progression and treatment. Exon-capture libraries were constructed from 46 patients including tumor biopsies, GW and PL pre and post-treatment (196 samples), with high vertical coverage >8,000×. At diagnosis, we detected TP53 mutations in 15/46 biopsies (32.6%), 7/46 GW- (15.2%) and 6/46 PL-samples (13%). Biopsies and GW were concordant in 38/46 cases (82.6%) for the presence/absence of mutations and, furthermore, four GW-exclusive mutations were identified, suggesting tumor heterogeneity. Considering the combined analysis of GW and PL, TP53 mutations found in biopsies were also identified in 9/15 (60%) of cases, the highest detection level reported for GAC. Our study indicates that GW could be useful to track DNA alterations, especially if anchored to a comprehensive gene-panel designed for this malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Pool Pizzi
- Laboratory of Medical Genomics, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | - Helano Carioca Freitas
- Laboratory of Medical Genomics, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Department of Clinical Oncology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Renan Valieris
- Laboratory of Computational Biology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Luiz Gonzaga Vaz Coelho
- Instituto Alfa de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
| | - Wilson Luiz da Costa
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Felipe J F Coimbra
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Israel Tojal da Silva
- Laboratory of Computational Biology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Diana Noronha Nunes
- Laboratory of Medical Genomics, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Emmanuel Dias-Neto
- Laboratory of Medical Genomics, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Laboratory of Neurosciences Alzira Denise Hertzog Silva (LIM-27), Instituto de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kosovec JE, Zaidi AH, Pounardjian TS, Jobe BA. The Potential Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: From Early Detection to Therapy. Front Oncol 2018; 8:610. [PMID: 30619750 PMCID: PMC6297385 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a lethal cancer requiring improved screening strategies and treatment options due to poor detection methods, aggressive progression, and therapeutic resistance. Emerging circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) technologies may offer a unique non-invasive strategy to better characterize the highly heterogeneous cancer and more clearly establish the genetic modulations leading to disease progression. The presented review describes the potential advantages of ctDNA methodologies as compared to current clinical strategies to improve clinical detection, enhance disease surveillance, evaluate prognosis, and personalize treatment. Specifically, we describe the ctDNA-targetable genetic markers of prognostic significance to stratify patients into risk of progression from benign to malignant disease and potentially offer cost-effective screening of established cancer. We also describe the application of ctDNA to more effectively characterize the heterogeneity and particular mutagenic resistance mechanisms in real-time to improve prognosis and therapeutic monitoring strategies. Lastly, we discuss the inconsistent clinical responses to currently approved therapies for EAC and the role of ctDNA to explore the dynamic regulation of novel targeted and immunotherapies to personalize therapy and improve patient outcomes. Although there are clear limitations of ctDNA technologies for immediate clinical deployment, this review presents the prospective role of such applications to potentially overcome many of the notable hurdles to treating EAC patients. A deeper understanding of complex EAC tumor biology may result in the progress toward improved clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliann E Kosovec
- Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Ali H Zaidi
- Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Tamar S Pounardjian
- Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Blair A Jobe
- Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Borggreve AS, Mook S, Verheij M, Mul VEM, Bergman JJ, Bartels-Rutten A, Ter Beek LC, Beets-Tan RGH, Bennink RJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Brosens LAA, Defize IL, van Dieren JM, Dijkstra H, van Hillegersberg R, Hulshof MC, van Laarhoven HWM, Lam MGEH, van Lier ALHMW, Muijs CT, Nagengast WB, Nederveen AJ, Noordzij W, Plukker JTM, van Rossum PSN, Ruurda JP, van Sandick JW, Weusten BLAM, Voncken FEM, Yakar D, Meijer GJ. Preoperative image-guided identification of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer (PRIDE): a multicenter observational study. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:1006. [PMID: 30342494 PMCID: PMC6195948 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4892-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nearly one third of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced esophageal cancer have a pathologic complete response (pCR) of the primary tumor upon histopathological evaluation of the resection specimen. The primary aim of this study is to develop a model that predicts the probability of pCR to nCRT in esophageal cancer, based on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT). Accurate response prediction could lead to a patient-tailored approach with omission of surgery in the future in case of predicted pCR or additional neoadjuvant treatment in case of non-pCR. METHODS The PRIDE study is a prospective, single arm, observational multicenter study designed to develop a multimodal prediction model for histopathological response to nCRT for esophageal cancer. A total of 200 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer - of which at least 130 patients with adenocarcinoma and at least 61 patients with squamous cell carcinoma - scheduled to receive nCRT followed by esophagectomy will be included. The primary modalities to be incorporated in the prediction model are quantitative parameters derived from MRI and 18F-FDG PET-CT scans, which will be acquired at fixed intervals before, during and after nCRT. Secondary modalities include blood samples for analysis of the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at 3 time-points (before, during and after nCRT), and an endoscopy with (random) bite-on-bite biopsies of the primary tumor site and other suspected lesions in the esophagus as well as an endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine needle aspiration of suspected lymph nodes after finishing nCRT. The main study endpoint is the performance of the model for pCR prediction. Secondary endpoints include progression-free and overall survival. DISCUSSION If the multimodal PRIDE concept provides high predictive performance for pCR, the results of this study will play an important role in accurate identification of esophageal cancer patients with a pCR to nCRT. These patients might benefit from a patient-tailored approach with omission of surgery in the future. Vice versa, patients with non-pCR might benefit from additional neoadjuvant treatment, or ineffective therapy could be stopped. TRIAL REGISTRATION The article reports on a health care intervention on human participants and was prospectively registered on March 22, 2018 under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03474341 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A S Borggreve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - S Mook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Verheij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V E M Mul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GW, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J J Bergman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Bartels-Rutten
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L C Ter Beek
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R J Bennink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - I L Defize
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J M van Dieren
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Dijkstra
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GW, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M C Hulshof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G E H Lam
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A L H M W van Lier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C T Muijs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GW, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - W B Nagengast
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GW, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - A J Nederveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Noordzij
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GW, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J T M Plukker
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GW, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - P S N van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J P Ruurda
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J W van Sandick
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F E M Voncken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D Yakar
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GW, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - G J Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Battaglin F, Naseem M, Puccini A, Lenz HJ. Molecular biomarkers in gastro-esophageal cancer: recent developments, current trends and future directions. Cancer Cell Int 2018; 18:99. [PMID: 30008616 PMCID: PMC6042434 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-018-0594-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastro-esophageal adenocarcinomas (GEA) represent a severe global health burden and despite improvements in the multimodality treatment of these malignancies the prognosis of patients remains poor. HER2 overexpression/amplification has been the first predictive biomarker approved in clinical practice to guide patient selection for targeted treatment with trastuzumab in advanced gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancers. More recently, immunotherapy has been approved for the treatment of GEA and PD-L1 expression is now a biomarker required for the administration of pembrolizumab in these diseases. Significant progress has been made in recent years in dissecting the genomic makeup of GEA in order to identify distinct molecular subtypes linked to distinct patterns of molecular alterations. GEA have been found to be highly heterogeneous malignances, representing a challenge for biomarkers discovery and targeted treatment development. The current review focuses on an overview of established and novel promising biomarkers in GEA, covering recent molecular classifications from TCGA and ACRG. Main elements of molecular heterogeneity are discussed, as well as emerging mechanisms of primary and secondary resistance to HER2 targeted treatment and recent biomarker-driven trials. Future perspectives on the role of epigenetics, miRNA/lncRNA and liquid biopsy, and patient-derived xenograft models as a new platform for molecular-targeted drug discovery in GEA are presented. Our knowledge on the genomic landscape of GEA continues to evolve, uncovering the high heterogeneity and deep complexity of these tumors. The availability of new technologies and the identification of promising novel biomarker will be critical to optimize targeted treatment development in a setting where therapeutic options are currently lacking. Nevertheless, clinical validation of novel biomarkers and treatment strategies still represents an issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Battaglin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 5410, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, Clinical and Experimental Oncology Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Madiha Naseem
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 5410, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
| | - Alberto Puccini
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 5410, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
- Oncologia Medica 1, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 5410, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
| |
Collapse
|