Peripheral blood eosinophilia has a favorable prognostic impact on transplant outcomes after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Acute graft-versus-host disease presenting as Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous manifestations resembling Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) have been reported in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD); however, the clinicopathological characteristics of SJS/TEN-like aGVHD remain unexplored.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinicopathology, complications, and outcomes of patients with SJS/TEN-like aGVHD.

METHODS

We analyzed a multicenter cohort of patients with aGVHD between 2000 and 2021.

RESULTS

We analyzed 31 patients with aGVHD, including SJS/TEN-like (n = 15) and non-SJS/TEN-like (n = 16). Patients with SJS/TEN-like aGVHD had significantly more extensive erythema and skin detachment/mucositis. SJS/TEN-like aGVHD was significantly associated with higher aGVHD grading and systemic complications, including pancytopenia, leukopenia, anemia, severe thrombocytopenia, coagulation abnormality, hepatitis, diarrhea, renal dysfunction, and bacteremia. A significantly lower hemoglobin/red cell distribution width ratio was identified in SJS/TEN-like aGVHD. Histopathology showed significant severe dyskeratosis and interface change. Patients with SJS/TEN-like aGVHD had lower 2-month survival rates and 5.35-fold higher 5-year mortality rates than those with non-SJS/TEN-like aGVHD. Total mortality rates of patients with SJS/TEN-like aGVHD reached 80% during follow-up; sepsis predominated the causes of death.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective, nonrandomized study with a small sample size.

CONCLUSION

SJS/TEN-like aGVHD is associated with multiple systemic complications and high mortality. Early recognition, differential diagnosis from drug-induced-SJS/TEN, and appropriate treatment are critical.

Methods to Assess Disease Activity and Severity in Cutaneous Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: A Critical Literature Review

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), a potentially debilitating complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation, confers increased risk for mortality. Whereas treatment decisions rely on an accurate assessment of disease activity/severity, validated methods of assessing cutaneous cGVHD activity/severity appear to be limited. In this study, we aimed to identify and evaluate current data on the assessment of disease activity/severity in cutaneous cGVHD. Using modified PRISMA methods, we performed a critical literature review for relevant articles. Our literature search identified 1741 articles, of which 1635 were excluded as duplicates or failure to meet inclusion criteria. Of the included studies (n = 106), 39 (37%) addressed clinical and/or histopathologic parameters, 53 (50%) addressed serologic parameters, 8 (7.5%) addressed imaging parameters, and 6 (5.5%) addressed computer-based technologies. The only formally validated metric of disease activity/severity assessment in cutaneous cGVHD is the National Institutes of Health consensus scoring system, which is founded on clinical assessment alone. The lack of an objective marker for cGVHD necessitates further studies. An evaluation of the potential contributions of serologic, imaging, and/or computer-based technologies is warranted.

Early-Phase Peripheral Blood Eosinophilia Predicts Lower Overall and Non-Relapse Mortality After Single-Unit Cord Blood Transplantation

Peripheral blood eosinophilia has been associated with the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, the impacts of eosinophilia on cord blood transplantation (CBT) outcomes remain unclear. The objective of this study was to examine the associations between eosinophilia and overall survival, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, and acute and chronic GVHD after single-unit CBT for adults. We retrospectively analyzed the data for 225 adult patients who received single-unit CBT at our institute between March 2004 and March 2020. The cumulative incidence of eosinophilia, defined as an absolute eosinophil count of ≥500 × 10⁶/L in peripheral blood, was 48.9% (95% confidence interval, 42.2% to 55.2%) at 60 days after CBT. Recipient cytomegalovirus seronegative status and higher cryopreserved cord blood CD34⁺ cell dose were significantly associated with a higher incidence of eosinophilia after CBT. Among patients who achieved neutrophil recovery, neutrophil recovery was significantly earlier in patient with eosinophilia compared to those without eosinophilia (P = .016). Serum levels of interleukin-5 at 4 weeks were significantly higher in patients with eosinophilia compared with those without eosinophilia (P = .041). Multivariate analysis, in which the development of eosinophilia was treated as a time-dependent covariate, showed that eosinophilia was significantly associated with lower overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], .58; P = .034) and non-relapse mortality (HR, .41; P = .029), but not relapse incidence or development of acute or chronic GVHD. Our data suggested that early-phase eosinophilia is a predictor of favorable outcomes in adult patients undergoing single-unit CBT.

Increased regulatory T cells and eosinophils characterize atopic dermatitis-like graft-versus-host disease compared with lichen planus-like graft-versus-host disease

BACKGROUND

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) has various cutaneous manifestations. Little is known about the mechanisms of cutaneous GVHD with different clinical features.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the immunologic features and skin barrier functions of cutaneous GVHD.

METHODS

The study included 19 patients with atopic dermatitis (AD)-like GVHD, 8 with lichen planus (LP)-like GVHD, 24 with AD, and 15 healthy controls. The subpopulation of T cells in peripheral blood and skin lesions was measured by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence, respectively. Filaggrin expression in skin lesions was measured by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. Transepidermal water loss was also measured using Tewameter TM 300 (Courage & Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Köln, Germany).

RESULTS

The number of peripheral blood eosinophils in AD-like GVHD was significantly higher than that in LP-like GVHD. Type 2 helper T cells in peripheral blood and skin lesions were increased in AD-like GVHD and LP-like GVHD. Regulatory T cells in peripheral blood and skin lesions were increased in AD-like GVHD. Filaggrin expression and transepidermal water loss were increased in skin lesions of AD-like GVHD and LP-like GVHD.

LIMITATIONS

The number of patients is limited.

CONCLUSION

Although AD-like GVHD and LP-like GVHD both had elevated type 2 helper T cells and impaired skin barrier, increased eosinophils and regulatory T cells were found only in AD-like GVHD.

[Clinical analysis of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after haplo- hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]

Objective: To investigate the incidence, risk factors and survival of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) in patients who had undergone haplo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) . Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 444 consecutive patients who underwent haplo-HSCT and survived at least 100 days after transplantation in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January 2013 and December 2015. Results: By the end of follow-up on January 1, 2018, 25 patients (5.63%) had BOS (BOS group) . The median onset time of BOS was 448 (165-845) d post transplantation, the 1-year, 2-year and 3-year cumulative incidence of BOS was 1.6% (95%CI 1.5%-1.6%) , 4.8% (95%CI 4.7%-4.8%) and 5.8% (95%CI 5.7%-5.8%) , respectively. Among patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) , the cumulative incidence at the same intervals was 2.8% (95%CI 2.7%-2.8%) , 9.5% (95%CI 9.4%-9.5%) and 11.5% (95%CI 11.4%-11.6%) , respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the risk factors for BOS were high-risk primary disease, Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD and preceding cGVHD with other organs. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was lower among patients with than those without BOS, but the difference was not significant [71.8% (95%CI 53.9%-89.6%) vs 72.4% (95%CI 68.1%-76.7%) , P=0.400]. Overall 1-year, 3-year survival of patients with BOS from the time of diagnosis was 78.4% (95%CI 61.5%-95.3%) and 37.0% (95%CI 2.5%-71.5%) , respectively, significantly less than those without (93.9% and 89.3%, from day 448 after transplantation, respectively, P<0.001) . Furthermore, we found a significantly higher incidence of transplantation-related mortality (TRM) in patients with compared with patients without BOS (28.2% vs 10.9%, P<0.001) . The main risk factor for OS of BOS patients was the severity of pulmonary impairment at the time of diagnosis. Patients who developed severe BOS had a worse OS than those with moderate and mild BOS (P=0.049) . Conclusion: BOS is a severe pulmonary complication of haplo-HSCT. High-risk primary disease, Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD and preceding cGVHD were independent risk factors for BOS. Patients who developed BOS had a worse OS than those without BOS. The main risk factor for OS of BOS patients was the severity of pulmonary impairment.

Canadian chronic myeloid leukemia outcomes post-transplant in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era

The majority of patients with TKI failure respond to HCT. However, the relapse risk remains high. This study has evaluated transplant outcomes in 223 CML patients with TKI failure due to resistance (n = 132) or intolerance (n = 29), as well as those that were TKI naïve/responding with advanced disease (n = 35) or with chronic phase (CP, n = 27). We studied outcomes according to post-transplant BCR-ABL transcript level within 3 months. With respect to transplant outcomes according to the post-transplant BCR/ABLtranscript level within 3 months, the group failing to achieve a 1.3 log reduction (n = 14, 12.4%) showed the highest relapse rate of 78.6% at 5 years, compared to 26.2% and 24.1% in the groups achieving 1.3-4.0 log reduction (n = 45, 39.8%), and ≥4.1 log reduction (n = 54, 47.8%) respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the group failing to achieve a 1.3 log reduction had a 2.3-fold higher risk of death and 6.6 times higher risk of relapse. Poor overall survival after HCT was associated with advanced disease at diagnosis, but not disease status prior to HCT. Of 61 patients who relapsed after HCT, 47 were treated with post-transplant TKI therapy; those receiving TKI after loss of MR2 or MMR showed higher rates of response and survival compared to those receiving TKI after hematologic relapse (p < 0.001). QPCR log reduction level within 3 months post transplantation is prognostic in this population.

Eosinophils from Physiology to Disease: A Comprehensive Review

Despite being the second least represented granulocyte subpopulation in the circulating blood, eosinophils are receiving a growing interest from the scientific community, due to their complex pathophysiological role in a broad range of local and systemic inflammatory diseases as well as in cancer and thrombosis. Eosinophils are crucial for the control of parasitic infections, but increasing evidence suggests that they are also involved in vital defensive tasks against bacterial and viral pathogens including HIV. On the other side of the coin, eosinophil potential to provide a strong defensive response against invading microbes through the release of a large array of compounds can prove toxic to the host tissues and dysregulate haemostasis. Increasing knowledge of eosinophil biological behaviour is leading to major changes in established paradigms for the classification and diagnosis of several allergic and autoimmune diseases and has paved the way to a "golden age" of eosinophil-targeted agents. In this review, we provide a comprehensive update on the pathophysiological role of eosinophils in host defence, inflammation, and cancer and discuss potential clinical implications in light of recent therapeutic advances.

Improved prognostic stratification power of CIBMTR risk score with the addition of absolute lymphocyte and eosinophil counts at the onset of chronic GVHD

The CIBMTR chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) risk score can be refined and improved for better prognostic stratification. Three hundred and seven consecutive patients diagnosed with cGVHD by the NIH consensus criteria were retrospectively reviewed and had the CIBMTR risk score applied and analyzed. The CIBMTR risk score was successfully validated in our cohort (n = 307). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates in each risk group (RG) were 82.5 ± 11.3% (RG1), 79.4 ± 3.0% (RG2), 71.8 ± 6.3% (RG3), and 27.3 ± 13.4% (RG4). A significantly lower OS rate and higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) were noted in RG4 compared to the other RGs. However, there were no differences in OS or NRM among RG1 to 3. To improve prognostic stratification power of the CIBMTR risk score, we incorporated the absolute lymphocyte (ALC) and eosinophil count (EC) at time of cGVHD into the CIBMTR risk score. Lower ALC (<1.0 × 10⁹/L, HR 1.94, p = 0.014) and lower EC (<0.5 × 10⁹/L, HR 3.27, p = 0.014) were confirmed as adverse risk factors for OS. Patients were stratified into four revised risk groups (rRG). The 3-year OS rates were 93.3 ± 6.4% (rRG1, score 0-3), 84.9 ± 3.4% (rRG2, score 4-6), 70.9 ± 4.4% (rRG3, score 7-9), and 32.0 ± 1.1% (rRG4, score ≥ 10) (p < 0.001). The 3-year NRM rates were 0.0% (rRG1), 6.7 ± 0.4% (rRG2), 18.4 ± 0.7% (rRG3), and 57.7 ± 5.1% (rRG4) (p < 0.001). The revised CIBMTR risk score was superior to the original CIBMTR risk score for OS (p < 0.001). The revised CIBMTR risk score including ALC and EC at the onset of cGVHD improved the prognostic stratification power of the CIBMTR risk score for long-term outcomes.

Retrospective Study of Incidence and Prognostic Significance of Eosinophilia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Influence of Corticosteroid Therapy

Objective:

The clinical significance of eosinophilia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is controversial. This study aimed to retrospectively study the impact of eosinophilia on the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation by taking into account the influence of corticosteroid therapy.

Materials and Methods:

We retrospectively studied 204 patients with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndrome who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from January 2001 to December 2010.

Results:

The median age was 43 years (minimum-maximum: 17-65 years). Myeloablative conditioning was used in 153 patients and reduced intensity conditioning was employed in 51 patients. Donor cells were from bone marrow in 132 patients, peripheral blood in 34, and cord blood in 38. Eosinophilia was detected in 71 patients and there was no significant predictor of eosinophilia by multivariate analysis. There was no relationship between occurrence of eosinophilia and the incidence or grade of acute graft-versus-host disease when the patients were stratified according to corticosteroid treatment. Although eosinophilia was a prognostic factor for 5-year overall survival by univariate analysis, it was not a significant indicator by multivariate analysis.

Conclusion:

These results suggest that the clinical significance of eosinophilia in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation should be assessed with consideration of systemic corticosteroid administration.

Eosinophils and cancer

Eosinophils have long been known to infiltrate tumors, and in most cases, this is associated with an improved prognosis. However, the reasons behind this infiltration and the mechanism of action of the eosinophil have remained elusive. In this article, we explore the biology of eosinophils and examine their function in homeostasis and disease states, specifically focusing on what is currently known about the association of the eosinophil with cancer.

Eosinophils in the blood of hematopoietic stem cell transplanted patients are activated and have different molecular marker profiles in acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease

While increased numbers of eosinophils may be detected in patients with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, it is not known if eosinophils play a role in GVHD. The aims of this study were to determine: whether eosinophils are activated during GVHD; whether the patterns of activation are similar in acute and chronic GVHD; and the ways in which systemic corticosteroids affect eosinophils. Transplanted patients (n = 35) were investigated for eosinophil numbers and the expression levels of 16 eosinophilic cell surface markers using flow cytometry; all the eosinophil data were analyzed by the multivariate method OPLS-DA. Different patterns of molecule expression were observed on the eosinophils from patients with acute, chronic, and no GVHD, respectively. The molecules that provided the best discrimination between acute and chronic GVHD were: the activation marker CD9; adhesion molecules CD11c and CD18; chemokine receptor CCR3; and prostaglandin receptor CRTH2. Patients with acute or chronic GVHD who received systemic corticosteroid treatment showed down-regulation of the cell surface markers on their eosinophils, whereas corticosteroid treatment had no effect on the eosinophil phenotype in the patients without GVHD. In summary, eosinophils are activated in GVHD, display different activation profiles in acute and chronic GVHD, and are highly responsive to systemic corticosteroids.

The prevalence and prognostic value of concomitant eosinophilia in chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

The prognostic significance of eosinophilia after myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains to be established. Patients, whom developed chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after ASCT, were included (n = 142). Eosinophil count was analyzed at cGVHD onset. We observed no significant association between EO and the grade of cGVHD, thrombocytopenia, nor extensive skin involvement. Importantly, we observed no significant association between cGVHD with concomitant eosinophilia and long-term clinical outcomes, and subgroup analyses revealed a considerable confounding effect of ongoing steroid treatment. In conclusion, we advocate that prognostic conclusions regarding cGVHD with concomitant eosinophilia after ASCT should be interpreted with caution.

Regression of eosinophil counts after diagnosis of chronic graft-versus-host disease as a potential marker for improved clinical outcome

Eosinophilia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been associated with the development of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). However, a limited number of studies have investigated the course of eosinophil counts in relation to the onset of cGVHD. In this study, the course of relative eosinophil counts (RECs) was retrospectively analyzed in 64 patients who developed cGVHD following allogeneic HSCT in relation to overall survival (OS), relapse rate and clinical course of cGVHD. At onset of cGVHD, eosinophilia was observed in 45% of the patients and developed one week prior to cGVHD diagnosis. Furthermore, a trend towards improved OS in patients with eosinophilia was observed. Beneficial effects were most evident in patients who exhibited decreasing eosinophil counts one week after diagnosis of cGVHD. By contrast, an increase in or stable eosinophil counts one week after diagnosis were associated with significantly impaired OS and a significantly higher rate of later aggravation of cGVHD. Findings of this study suggested that the course of eosinophil counts may provide a useful parameter in the assessment of cGVHD development and activity allowing the potential identification of patient subpopulations with a good outcome and reduced cGVHD-related mortality.

National Institutes of Health chronic graft-versus-host disease staging in severely affected patients: organ and global scoring correlate with established indicators of disease severity and prognosis

Between 2004 and 2010, 189 adult patients were enrolled on the National Cancer Institute's cross-sectional chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) natural history study. Patients were evaluated by multiple disease scales and outcome measures, including the 2005 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Project cGVHD severity scores. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of the NIH scoring variables as determinants of disease severity in severely affected patients in efforts to standardize clinician evaluation and staging of cGVHD. Out of 189 patients enrolled, 125 met the criteria for severe cGVHD on the NIH global score, 62 of whom had moderate disease, with a median of 4 (range, 1-8) involved organs. Clinician-assigned average NIH organ score and the corresponding organ scores assigned by subspecialists were highly correlated (r = 0.64). NIH global severity scores showed significant associations with nearly all functional and quality of life outcome measures, including the Lee Symptom Scale, Short Form-36 Physical Component Scale, 2-minute walk, grip strength, range of motion, and Human Activity Profile. Joint/fascia, skin, and lung involvement affected function and quality of life most significantly and showed the greatest correlation with outcome measures. The final Cox model with factors jointly predictive for survival included the time from cGVHD diagnosis (>49 versus ≤49 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.23; P = .0011), absolute eosinophil count at the time of NIH evaluation (0-0.5 versus >0.5 cells/μL, HR = 3.95; P = .0006), and NIH lung score (3 versus 0-2, HR = 11.02; P < .0001). These results demonstrate that NIH organs and global severity scores are reliable measures of cGVHD disease burden. The strong association with subspecialist evaluation suggests that NIH organ and global severity scores are appropriate for clinical and research assessments, and may serve as a surrogate for more complex subspecialist examinations. In this population of severely affected patients, NIH lung score is the strongest predictor of poor overall survival, both alone and after adjustment for other important factors.

Eosinophilia, regardless of degree, is related to better outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Several recent studies report that, after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), eosinophilia is a favorable factor for transplant outcomes. However, whether the degree of eosinophilia influences transplant outcomes is yet to be established.

METHODS

We studied 144 patients with hematological malignancy who received allo-HCT at our institution. The stem cell sources were bone marrow in 84 patients, peripheral blood stem cells in 32 patients, and cord blood in 28 patients. One hundred and twelve patients underwent myeloablative conditioning and 49 patients had high-risk disease. We performed semi-landmark analysis to examine the influence of eosinophilia.

RESULTS

Eosinophilia developed at a median of 47 days after transplantation in 63 patients (44%). The patients with eosinophilia showed significantly better overall survival (OS) and a lower relapse rate at three years, compared to those without eosinophilia (66% vs 55%, p=0.04 and 30% vs 50%, p=0.002). On analysis following division into groups with mild (500-1,500×10(6)/L) and hyper- (>1,500×10(6)/L) eosinophilia, three-year OS and relapse rates were 68% and 65% (p=0.92), and 31% and 28% (p=0.90), respectively. On multivariate analysis, eosinophilia was significantly associated with lower relapse rates [HR: 0.5 (95% CI: 0.3-0.9), p=0.01] and the same trend was preserved in the analysis of the mild and hyper-eosinophilic groups.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that eosinophilia after allo-HCT was associated with better OS and a lower relapse rate, regardless of the levels. The mechanism of this effect is still unclear, and requires study of the pathophysiological process to clarify the relationship between the higher levels of eosinophilia after allo-HCT and organ infiltration.