A retrospective comparison of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine with methotrexate for immunosuppression after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with mobilized blood cells

Neurologic Complications of the Central Nervous System after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: The Role of Transplantation-Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy as a Potential Underreported Cause

Neurologic complications (NCs), especially those of the central nervous system (CNS), represent a severe complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and are associated with relevant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to characterize the potential risk factors for the development of CNS-NC, with a special focus on the role of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) as a predisposing factor. For this purpose, we compared cyclosporin A (CsA) versus tacrolimus (TAC) with respect to their influence on the incidence and type of CNS-NC after allo-HSCT. We retrospectively analyzed the incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcomes of CNS-NC diagnosed during the post-transplantation follow-up in patients with different high-risk hematologic malignancies who underwent allo-HSCT at our institution over a 20-year period. All patients included in the analysis received CNI (CsA or TAC) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We evaluated a total of 739 consecutive patients who underwent transplantation between December 1999 and April 2019. During a median follow-up of 6.8 years, we observed a CNS-NC incidence of 17%. The development of CNS-NC was associated with decreased overall survival (OS) and increased transplantation-related mortality (TRM). The most frequent CNS-NCs were infections (30%) and neurologic adverse events related to the administration of CNI, TAC, or CsA as GVHD prophylaxis (42%). In the multivariable analysis, age, total body irradiation (TBI), and severe acute GVHD and chronic GVHD were significant risk factors in the development of CNS-NCs. TAC compared with CsA emerged as an independent predisposing factor for CNS-NCs. The TAC-associated risk of CNS-NCs was related mostly to the occurrence of transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) with neurologic manifestations (neuro-TA-TMA), although the general TA-TMA incidence was comparable in the 2 CNI subgroups. CNS-NCs are associated with poor prognosis after allo-HSCT, with TAC emerging as a potential yet insufficiently characterized predisposing factor.

Risk factors for adverse outcomes following haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide: a two-center analysis

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative therapy for several malignant hematologic diseases and alternative donors, including haploidentical, play a significant role in HCT. Despite the increasing use of haplo-HCT with PTCy, some questions remain open. The objective of the present study was to investigate risk factors for adverse outcomes after haplo-HCT with PTCy. This is a retrospective study conducted at two Brazilian centers. A total of 103 patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent first allogeneic, haploidentical HCT with PTCy were included. Risk factors for death were age at transplant (HR = 1.03 for each year; p = 0.002) and high/very high disease risk index (DRI; HR = 2.77; p = 0.0007) and mother as the donor compared with other donors (HR = 3.53; p = 0.005). In multivariate analysis, PFS was significantly poorer for older patients (HR = 1.02; p = 0.006), high/very high DRI (HR = 2.39; p = 0.003), and mother as the donor compared with other donors (HR = 3.18; p = 0.006). Relapse rate was higher for high/very high DRI (HR = 4.01; p = 0.002) and mother as the donor compared with other donors (HR = 2.52; p = 0.05). NRM was higher for older patients (HR = 1.03 for each year; p = 0.03). Tacrolimus was a protective factor for grades II-IV aGVHD (HR = 0.46; p = 0.04) compared with cyclosporine. Peripheral blood (PBSC) was a risk factor for cGVHD (HR = 3.48; p = 0.006), while tacrolimus was protective (HR = 0.30; p = 0.009). Mother as the donor compared with other donors was also a risk factor for poorer OS, PFS, and relapse, suggesting that this combination should be avoided. Tacrolimus was protective for both grades II-IV aGVHD and cGVHD, suggesting that tacrolimus may be more effective than cyclosporine in preventing GVHD. PBSC was a risk factor for cGVHD without any impact on relapse. Prospective studies comparing tacrolimus with cyclosporine are awaited.

Omission of day +11 methotrexate dose and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes: results of a systematic review/meta-analysis

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is potentially curative for patients with malignant and benign hematologic conditions. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a known complication of allo-HCT that results in significant morbidity and mortality. A common GVHD prophylaxis strategy combines a calcineurin inhibitor with methotrexate. When mucositis and organ toxicity develop, the day +11 dose is frequently omitted to limit further organ damage. The potential impact of this practice on allo-HCT outcomes is unclear as published data show conflicting results. Thus, we performed a systematic review/meta-analysis of the available literature to assess the impact of omitting day +11 methotrexate on allo-HCT recipients. Data were extracted in relation to benefits (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS]) and harms (acute and chronic GVHD, non-relapse mortality [NRM], and relapse). Pooled OS rate favored those who received day +11 methotrexate vs. those who did not (HR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.02-1.43; p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in pooled rates of PFS (HR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.60-1.52; p = 0.85), acute GVHD (HR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.35-2.98; p = 0.96), chronic GVHD (HR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.44-1.57; p = 0.57), NRM (HR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.67-1.11; p = 0.25), and relapse (HR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.75-1.26; p = 0.83) between the two groups. Large prospective multicenter studies are needed to better define the significance of day +11 methotrexate omission.

Immunosuppressive activity of daphnetin on the humoral immune responses in ovalbumin-sensitized BALB/c mice

INTRODUCTION

Most of the immunosuppressive drugs are used for the treatment of autoimmune disease, allergic diseases, and transplant rejection, but toxicity is the major obstacle for the potent drugs in the wide use of these immunosuppressive drugs. Daphnetin, a Chinese herbal product, has been reported that daphnetin possesses antimicrobial, anticoagulation, antimalarial, anticancer, and antioxidant activity. In a previous study, we found that daphnetin exhibited a potential immunosuppressive effect on LPS-induced B lymphocyte cells in vitro, therefore, in this research, we investigated the immunosuppressive effects of daphnetin in BALB/c mice use OVA as a prototype antigen.

METHODS

Sixty BALB/c mice were divided into six groups. The emulsion (100 μL containing 100 μg OVA) was injected subcutaneously with OVA + CFA into the shaved backs of the BALB/c mice on day 1, and a boosting injection was administered in OVA + IFA 2 weeks later. Beginning on the day of immunization, the immunized mice were administered intraperitoneally with daphnetin at a dose of 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg in saline solution for 28 consecutive days. We measured the effect of daphnetin on OVA-specific antibody, cytokine production, and Splenocyte proliferation in vivo.

RESULTS

The results revealed that daphnetin significantly suppressed serum immunoglobulin G levels (IgG), and the OVA-specific IgG subclasses IgG1 and IgG2b, daphnetin was also significantly decreased the Th1 and Th2 cytokine productions, inhibited the splenocytes proliferation rate in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

It proved that daphnetin could suppress humoral response activity on OVA-sensitized mice, suggesting a potential role on daphnetin as a new immunosuppressive drug.

Comparison of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine Combined With Methotrexate for Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

After patients receive hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), both cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus (TAC) in combination with methotrexate (MTX) are recommended as the standard prophylaxis strategy for graft versus host disease (GVHD) by the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. However, the advantage of TAC combined with MTX lacks conclusive evidence.

METHODS

We searched online databases for studies comparing CsA + MTX and TAC + MTX in patients who received HSCT. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were applied to compare the pooled data.

RESULTS

We found a significant reduction in the grade II to IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) rate (OR, 0.42; CI, 0.28-0.61; P < 0.00001), grade III to IV aGVHD rate (OR, 0.59; CI, 0.38-0.92; P = 0.02), chronic GVHD rate (OR, 0.79; CI, 0.62-1.00; P = 0.05), and nonrelapse mortality rate (OR, 0.62; CI, 0.40-0.95; P = 0.03) and an increase in the overall survival (OS) rate (only in those received from unrelated donor) (OR, 1.30; CI, 1.15-1.48; P < 0.0001) in the TAC + MTX group. Similar outcomes occurred for the relapse rate and disease-free survival rate in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TAC + MTX has a superior effect in the prevention of aGVHD in patients who received HSCT and further prolongs the OS in patients who received from unrelated donor transplants. CsA + MTX prolongs the OS in patients who received HSCT from HLA-identical sibling donors. The leukemic relapse and disease-free survival rate were not different between the 2 regimens. Thus, we conclude that TAC + MTX was superior to CsA + MTX, especially for HSCT patients with nonmalignant disorders. Further studies are still required to evaluate the effect of TAC or CsA combined with other suppressors in the treatment regimen following HSCT.

Impact of Rituximab and Host/Donor Fc Receptor Polymorphisms after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for CD20+ B Cell Malignancies

We previously reported a 24% 1-year relapse rate in 93 older or medically unfit patients with CD20⁺ B cell malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with low-intensity conditioning. The current prospective study tested the hypothesis that disease relapse could be reduced and overall survival (OS) improved by peritransplantation administration of rituximab (RTX). Sixty-three patients received RTX (375 mg/m²/day) on days -3, +10, +24, and +38 along with 2 to 3 Gy total body irradiation with or without fludarabine (30 mg/m² for 3 days). Median RTX levels of >25 μg/mL were achieved through day +84 after transplantation, but RTX level was not correlated with relapse or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). HCT recipients with F/F and V/F FCγRIIIa polymorphisms showed a trend toward a higher relapse rate compared with those with V/V polymorphism (P= .15). No difference in outcome was found based on V/V donor pairing. Five-year relapse rates were similar between RTX-treated patients and historical controls (32% versus 28%; P = .94). RTX-treated patients had greater 5-year OS (47% versus 38%; P = .13) and progression-free survival (41% versus 32%; P = .12) compared with historical controls who underwent HCT without RTX, although the difference was not statistically significant. The incidence of acute GVHD was similar in the 2 groups (grade II-IV, 57% versus 56%; grade III-IV, 13% versus 17%), but the 5-year incidence of chronic GVHD was higher among RTX-treated patients (62% versus 47%). In patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, peritransplantation RTX neither reduced relapse nor improved GVHD. The role of donor-recipient pairing by FCγRIIIa polymorphisms in outcomes remains to be determined.

Prophylaxis and management of graft versus host disease after stem-cell transplantation for haematological malignancies: updated consensus recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major factor contributing to mortality and morbidity after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Because of the small number of results from well designed, large-scale, clinical studies there is considerable variability in the prevention and treatment of GVHD worldwide. In 2014, to standardise treatment approaches the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation published recommendations on the management of GVHD in the setting of HLA-identical sibling or unrelated donor transplantation in adult patients with haematological malignancies. Here we update these recommendations including the results of study published after 2014. Evidence was searched in three steps: first, a widespread scan of published trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews; second, expert opinion was added for specific issues following several rounds of debate; and third, a refined search to target debated or rapidly updating issues. On the basis of this evidence and the 2014 recommendations, five members of the EBMT Transplant Complications Working Party created 38 statements on GVHD prophylaxis, drug management, and treatment of acute and chronic GVHD. Subsequently, they created the EBMT GVHD management recommendation expert panel by recruiting 20 experts with expertise in GVHD management. An email-based, two-round Delphi panel approach was used to manage the consensus. Modified National Comprehensive Cancer Network categories for evidence and consensus were applied to the approved statements. We reached 100% consensus for 29 recommendations and 95% consensus for nine recommendations. Key updates to these recommendations include a broader use of rabbit anti-T-cell globulin; lower steroid doses for the management of grade 2 acute GVHD with isolated skin or upper gastrointestinal tract manifestations; fluticasone, azithromycin, and montelukast should be used for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome; and the addition of newer treatment options for resteroid-refractory acute and chronic GVHD. In addition, we discuss specific aspects of GVHD prophylaxis and management in the setting of haploidentical transplantation and in paediatric patients, but no formal recommendations on those procedures have been provided in this Review. The European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation proposes to use these recommendations as a basis for the routine management of GVHD during stem-cell transplantation.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation with CD34+ Cell Selection

The success of allogeneic stem cell transplant is hampered by the development of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) which has direct impact on treatment-related mortality and morbidity. As a result, T cell depletion through positive selection of CD34+ cells has emerged as a promising strategy to reduce acute and chronic GvHD in these patients.

In this review, we summarize the main characteristics of allogeneic stem cell transplant with CD34+ cell selection including risks of graft failure, GvHD, infection, organ toxicity, and long-term survival. Moreover, we highlight future strategies to improve the results of this platform and to consolidate its use in clinical practice.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in the Outpatient Setting

Conditioning with fludarabine and low-dose total-body irradiation before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) enabled treating older or medically infirm patients with advanced hematologic malignancies in the outpatient setting. Between December 1997 and June 2017, 1037 patients with hematologic malignancies received peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts from HLA-matched or 1 HLA antigen/allele-mismatched related or unrelated donors. Median age was 58 (range, 18 to 80) years. Serious comorbidities with Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) scores ≥3 were present in 52% of patients. We found that 47% of patients were either never hospitalized or only had an overnight hospital stay for infusion of late-arriving PBSCs while 53% were admitted for a median of 6 days. Main reasons for admission were infection, fever, graft-versus-host disease, and regimen-related toxicity. Two thirds of admissions occurred within 3 weeks of HCT. The 5-year risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 26% among hospitalized patients and 13% among nonhospitalized patients. Significant risk factors for hospitalization included unrelated transplants, 1 HLA antigen-mismatched transplant, high HCT-CI scores, and diagnosis of nonmyeloma malignancies. Significant risk factors for NRM were hospitalization, older age, unrelated transplants, and high HCT-CI scores. Ambulatory allogeneic HCT is feasible and safe.

Advances in Ex Vivo T Cell Depletion - Where Do We Stand?

Graft-versus-host (GVHD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). As donor T cells are recognized as key drivers of GVHD, some approaches to prevent GVHD have focused on T cell depletion of the allograft. In this review we summarize methods and outcomes of ex vivo T cell depleted (TCD) HCT with a focus on CD34+ selection. This platform is efficacious in preventing acute and chronic GVHD across a wide range of hematologic malignancies, and with the exception of chronic myeloid leukemia, is not associated with adverse relapse or survival outcomes compared to conventional GVHD prophylaxis platforms. In retrospective comparisons recipients of CD34+ selected HCT have higher rates of GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) than conventional HCT counterparts. Although CD34+ selected allografts require myeloablative and antithymocyte-globulin based conditioning to support engraftment, abrogation of calcineurin inhibitors and methotrexate in this approach reduces its toxicity such that it can be considered in select older and more comorbid patients who could benefit from ablative HCT. A trial comparing GVHD prophylaxis regimens (BMT CTN 1301, NCT02345850) has completed accrual and will be the first to compare CD34+ selected HCT with conventional HCT in a randomized prospective setting. Its findings have potential to establish CD34+ selected HCT as a new standard-of-care platform for GVHD prevention.

Dynamical system modeling to simulate donor T cell response to whole exome sequencing-derived recipient peptides: Understanding randomness in alloreactivity incidence following stem cell transplantation

Quantitative relationship between the magnitude of variation in minor histocompatibility antigens (mHA) and graft versus host disease (GVHD) pathophysiology in stem cell transplant (SCT) donor-recipient pairs (DRP) is not established. In order to elucidate this relationship, whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on 27 HLA matched related (MRD), & 50 unrelated donors (URD), to identify nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). An average 2,463 SNPs were identified in MRD, and 4,287 in URD DRP (p<0.01); resulting peptide antigens that may be presented on HLA class I molecules in each DRP were derived in silico (NetMHCpan ver2.0) and the tissue expression of proteins these were derived from determined (GTex). MRD DRP had an average 3,670 HLA-binding-alloreactive peptides, putative mHA (pmHA) with an IC50 of <500 nM, and URD, had 5,386 (p<0.01). To simulate an alloreactive donor cytotoxic T cell response, the array of pmHA in each patient was considered as an operator matrix modifying a hypothetical cytotoxic T cell clonal vector matrix; each responding T cell clone’s proliferation was determined by the logistic equation of growth, accounting for HLA binding affinity and tissue expression of each alloreactive peptide. The resulting simulated organ-specific alloreactive T cell clonal growth revealed marked variability, with the T cell count differences spanning orders of magnitude between different DRP. Despite an estimated, uniform set of constants used in the model for all DRP, and a heterogeneously treated group of patients, higher total and organ-specific T cell counts were associated with cumulative incidence of moderate to severe GVHD in recipients. In conclusion, exome wide sequence differences and the variable alloreactive peptide binding to HLA in each DRP yields a large range of possible alloreactive donor T cell responses. Our findings also help understand the apparent randomness observed in the development of alloimmune responses.

Acute graft-versus-host disease of the gut: considerations for the gastroenterologist

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is central to the management of many haematological disorders. A frequent complication of HSCT is acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a condition in which immune cells from the donor attack healthy recipient tissues. The gastrointestinal system is among the most common sites affected by acute GVHD, and severe manifestations of acute GVHD of the gut portends a poor prognosis in patients after HSCT. Acute GVHD of the gastrointestinal tract presents both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Although the clinical manifestations are nonspecific and overlap with those of infection and drug toxicity, diagnosis is ultimately based on clinical criteria. As reliable serum biomarkers have not yet been validated outside of clinical trials, endoscopic and histopathological evaluation continue to be utilized in diagnosis. Once a diagnosis of gastrointestinal acute GVHD is established, therapy with systemic corticosteroids is typically initiated, and non-responders can be treated with a wide range of second-line therapies. In addition to treating the underlying disease, the management of complications including profuse diarrhoea, severe malnutrition and gastrointestinal bleeding is paramount. In this Review, we discuss strategies for the diagnosis and management of acute GVHD of the gastrointestinal tract as they pertain to the practising gastroenterologist.

Pharmacokinetic comparison of cyclosporin A and tacrolimus in graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis

A number of studies were published with contradictory results comparing tacrolimus (Tac) and cyclosporine A (CsA) for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, but there are only few that accounted for pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. In this study, we created a model based on median concentrations, variability of concentrations, and failures to maintain target levels that distinguished patients with low, intermediate, and high risks of acute GVHD (hazard ratios (HR) 1.77, 95%CI 1.36-2.32, p < 0.0001). This model was used to compare 95 patients with CsA and 239 with Tac GVHD prophylaxis. In the multivariate analysis, incorporating PK risk, no differences were observed for grade II-IV acute GVHD (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.48-1.10, p = 0.13), but grade III-IV acute GVHD was lower in the Tac group (HR 0.47, 95%CI 0.28-0.78, p = 0.004). The observed difference was due to patients with high PK risk (HR 0.377, 95%CI 0.19-0.75, p = 0.005), but not with low and intermediate PK risk (p > 0.05). Patients in the Tac group had better GVHD relapse-free survival (HR = 0.659, p = 0.01) and comparable overall survival (p > 0.05). In conclusion, PK risk should be accounted for in comparisons of GVHD prophylaxis regimens with calcineurin inhibitors, and Tac was superior to CsA in patients with high, but not intermediate and low PK risk.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacogenomics of Immunosuppressants in Allogeneic Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Part I

Although immunosuppressive treatments and target concentration intervention (TCI) have significantly contributed to the success of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), there is currently no consensus on the best immunosuppressive strategies. Compared with solid organ transplantation, alloHCT is unique because of the potential for bidirectional reactions (i.e. host-versus-graft and graft-versus-host). Postgraft immunosuppression typically includes a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) and a short course of methotrexate after high-dose myeloablative conditioning, or a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil after reduced-intensity conditioning. There are evolving roles for the antithymyocyte globulins (ATGs) and sirolimus as postgraft immunosuppression. A review of the pharmacokinetics and TCI of the main postgraft immunosuppressants is presented in this two-part review. All immunosuppressants are characterized by large intra- and interindividual pharmacokinetic variability and by narrow therapeutic indices. It is essential to understand immunosuppressants' pharmacokinetic properties and how to use them for individualized treatment incorporating TCI to improve outcomes. TCI, which is mandatory for the calcineurin inhibitors and sirolimus, has become an integral part of postgraft immunosuppression. TCI is usually based on trough concentration monitoring, but other approaches include measurement of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over the dosing interval or limited sampling schedules with maximum a posteriori Bayesian personalization approaches. Interpretation of pharmacodynamic results is hindered by the prevalence of studies enrolling only a small number of patients, variability in the allogeneic graft source and variability in postgraft immunosuppression. Given the curative potential of alloHCT, the pharmacodynamics of these immunosuppressants deserves to be explored in depth. Development of sophisticated systems pharmacology models and improved TCI tools are needed to accurately evaluate patients' exposure to drugs in general and to immunosuppressants in particular. Sequential studies, first without and then with TCI, should be conducted to validate the clinical benefit of TCI in homogenous populations; randomized trials are not feasible, because there are higher-priority research questions in alloHCT. In Part I of this article, we review the alloHCT process to facilitate optimal design of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics studies. We also review the pharmacokinetics and TCI of calcineurin inhibitors and methotrexate.

A comparison of tacrolimus and cyclosporine combined with methotrexate for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, stratified by stem cell source: a retrospective nationwide survey

This nationwide, retrospective study compared the efficacy of cyclosporine and tacrolimus with methotrexate (CsA/MTX and TAC/MTX) for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prevention and transplant-related outcomes. Data were obtained from the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for ≥ 16-year-old leukemia patients who received CsA/MTX or TAC/MTX after bone marrow transplantation and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from serological HLA-matched related donors (MRD), HLA 8/8 allele-matched, or one allele-mismatched unrelated bone marrow (UBM), or 0-2 antigen-mismatched unrelated cord blood (UCB) transplantation between January 2005 and December 2009. Separate analyses were performed for each cohort. Adjusted multivariate analyses indicated that in the MRD (n = 1524) and the UBM (n = 1466) cohorts, TAC/MTX significantly reduced grade II-IV aGVHD risk (HR 0.58, P = 0.006 and HR 0.77, P = 0.015, respectively) without affecting the other transplant-related outcomes. In the UCB cohort (n = 925), TAC/MTX significantly reduced the risk of non-relapse mortality (HR 0.63, P = 0.027) and chronic GVHD (HR 0.60, P = 0.02) without significant effects on grade II-IV aGVHD (HR 0.83, P = 0.21). Our results may provide the most up-to-date data regarding GVHD prevention in Japan.

Mismatched unrelated alternative donors for hematological malignancies

For the majority of hematologic malignancies allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative treatment option. Sibling donors have been the standard for adult patients. Since there is not a suitable family donor for all patients, the need for alternative donors for HCT is great. Fortunately, the availability of unrelated volunteer donor registries has expanded over the years and the results of HCT with matched unrelated donors (MUD) are comparable to the results with matched related donors (MRD). Nevertheless, there are many patients lacking a well-matched donor. To increase the applicability of transplantation, alternative donors such as mismatched unrelated donors (MMURD), cord blood stem cell products and haploidentical related donors have been widely used. This review seeks to give insights into the use of MMUD donors for HCT and summarize the existing data.

Tacrolimus versus Cyclosporine after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acquired Aplastic Anemia

Combinations of cyclosporine (CSP) with methotrexate (MTX) have been widely used for immunosuppression after allogeneic transplantation for acquired aplastic anemia. We compared outcomes with tacrolimus (TAC)+MTX versus CSP+MTX after transplantation from HLA-identical siblings (SIB) or unrelated donors (URD) in a retrospective cohort of 949 patients with severe aplastic anemia. Study endpoints included hematopoietic recovery, graft failure, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), chronic GVHD, and mortality. TAC+MTX was used more frequently in older patients and, in recent years, in both SIB and URD groups. In multivariate analysis, TAC+MTX was associated with a lower risk of mortality in URD recipients and with slightly earlier absolute neutrophil count recovery in SIB recipients. Other outcomes did not differ statistically between the 2 regimens. No firm conclusions were reached regarding the relative merits of TAC+MTX versus CSP+MTX after hematopoietic cell transplantation for acquired aplastic anemia. Prospective studies would be needed to determine whether the use of TAC+MTX is associated with lower risk of mortality in URD recipients with acquired aplastic anemia.

Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Analysis of Late Relapse Using Comparative Karyotype and Chromosome Genome Array Testing

Relapse is a major cause of failure after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We analyzed the relapse pattern in 1007 patients who underwent transplantation for MDS to identify factors that may determine the timing of relapse. Overall, 254 patients relapsed: 213 before 18 months and 41 later than 18 months after HCT, a time point frequently used in clinical trials. The hazard of relapse declined progressively with time since transplantation. A higher proportion of patients with early relapse had high-risk cytogenetics compared with patients with late relapse (P = .009). Patients with late relapse had suggestively longer postrelapse survival than patients who relapsed early, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = .07). Among 41 late relapsing patients, sequential cytogenetic data were available in 36. In 41% of these, new clonal abnormalities in addition to pre-HCT findings were identified at relapse; in 30% pre-HCT abnormalities were replaced by new clones, in 17.3% the same clone was present before HCT and at relapse, and in 9.7%, no abnormalities were present either before HCT or at relapse. Comparative chromosomal genomic array testing in 3 patients with late relapse showed molecular differences not detectable by cytogenetics between the pre-HCT clones and the clones at relapse. These data show that late relapses are not infrequent in patients who undergo transplantation for MDS. The pattern of new cytogenetic alterations at late relapse is similar to that observed in patients with early relapse and supports the concept that MDS relapse early and late after HCT is frequently due to the emergence of clones not detectable before HCT.

Sirolimus, tacrolimus and low-dose methotrexate based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after non-ablative or reduced intensity conditioning in related and unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant

Encouraging results have been reported with sirolimus, tacrolimus and low-dose methotrexate after non-myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 71 patients with lymphoid malignancies treated with this prophylaxis regimen after non-myeloablative or reduced intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Grafts were human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related in 29 (41%), matched unrelated in 36 (51%) and 9/10 HLA-matched unrelated in six (8%) patients. The regimen was well tolerated and over 90% of patients completed the planned treatment. The cumulative incidences of 1-year grade B-D and C-D acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 0.28 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.39) and 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03-0.15), respectively, and of 1- and 2-year chronic GVHD (National Institutes of Health criteria) in 70 evaluable patients were 0.15 (95% CI, 0.08-0.24) and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.22-0.44), respectively. The median day of onset of acute GVHD was 123 days (range, 17-268 days). Peri-transplant rituximab or anti-thymocyte globulin did not affect GVHD. The cumulative incidence of 1-year non-relapse mortality and relapse were 4% and 20%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 3.5 (range: 0.18-5.1) years, overall survival and progression-free survival at 2 years were 82% and 66%, respectively. This GVHD regimen results in a low incidence and severity of acute and chronic GVHD after reduced intensity and non-myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for lymphoid malignancies. The study also highlights the incidence of late onset acute GVHD in non-myeloablative/reduced intensity conditioning, and the contribution of the new GVHD staging system that more accurately reflects clinical outcomes.

Graft-versus-host disease and graft-versus-tumor effects after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

PURPOSE

We designed a minimal-intensity conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies unable to tolerate high-intensity regimens because of age, serious comorbidities, or previous high-dose HCT. The regimen allows the purest assessment of graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effects apart from conditioning and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) not augmented by regimen-related toxicities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received low-dose total-body irradiation ± fludarabine before HCT from HLA-matched related (n = 611) or unrelated (n = 481) donors, followed by mycophenolate mofetil and a calcineurin inhibitor to aid engraftment and control GVHD. Median patient age was 56 years (range, 7 to 75 years). Forty-five percent of patients had comorbidity scores of ≥ 3. Median follow-up time was 5 years (range, 0.6 to 12.7 years).

RESULTS

Depending on disease risk, comorbidities, and GVHD, lasting remissions were seen in 45% to 75% of patients, and 5-year survival ranged from 25% to 60%. At 5 years, the nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate was 24%, and the relapse mortality rate was 34.5%. Most NRM was a result of GVHD. The most significant factors associated with GVHD-associated NRM were serious comorbidities and grafts from unrelated donors. Most relapses occurred early while the immune system was compromised. GVT effects were comparable after unrelated and related grafts. Chronic GVHD, but not acute GVHD, further increased GVT effects. The potential benefit associated with chronic GVHD was outweighed by increased NRM.

CONCLUSION

Allogeneic HCT relying on GVT effects is feasible and results in cures of an appreciable number of malignancies. Improved results could come from methods that control progression of malignancy early after HCT and effectively prevent GVHD.

Pharmacologic prophylaxis regimens for acute graft-versus-host disease: past, present and future

Abstract Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) has compromised and continues to compromise the benefits associated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant to cure malignant and non-malignant diseases. Pharmacologic interventions to prevent GVHD have emerged as a major objective of research in the immunology and transplant fields. A better understanding of the pathobiology behind the GVHD process has led the way to novel approaches and medications. Here we review the present arsenal of medications used to prevent GVHD, focusing on past experience and the current evidence, and discuss future potential targets.

Pre-engraftment syndrome after myeloablative dual umbilical cord blood transplantation: risk factors and response to treatment

High fevers and/or rashes prior to neutrophil engraftment are frequently observed after umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation, and the condition is referred to as pre-engraftment syndrome (PES). Few studies have evaluated the risk factors for and treatment response to PES. Therefore, we retrospectively characterized PES in 57 consecutive engrafted patients (≥ 12 years old) who received myeloablative dual UCB transplantation. All patients received TBI (≥ 13.2 Gy)-based myeloablative conditioning. Tacrolimus (n=35) or CYA (n=22) combined with mycophenolate mofetil was used as GVHD prophylaxis. PES was defined as the presence of non-infectious fever (≥ 38.5 °C) and/or rash prior to or on the day of neutrophil engraftment. The incidence (95% confidence interval) of PES was 77% (66-88%). The incidence of PES was significantly higher in patients who received CYA as a GVHD prophylaxis than those who received tacrolimus (P<0.001), and this association was confirmed in the multivariate analysis. The occurrence of PES did not impact OS or tumor relapse, although it may have increased non-relapse mortality (P=0.071). The incidence of acute GHVD or treatment-related mortality was not influenced by the choice to use corticosteroids to treat PES. This study suggests that use of CYA for GVHD prophylaxis increases the risk of PES following dual UCB transplantation.

Prevention of graft-vs.-host disease

INTRODUCTION

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a curative treatment for many malignant and non-malignant hematologic disorders. However, graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) remains a major complication of allogeneic HCT and limits the success of this approach.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews recent developments in the prevention of acute and chronic GVHD. In the setting of acute GVHD prevention, recent trials of T-cell depletion using Fresenius-ATG are reviewed, as well as studies testing total lymphoid irradiation, mesenchymal stromal cells, rituximab, statins, sirolimus and other investigational agents. In the setting of chronic GVHD, results with Fresenius-ATG are reviewed, as well as B-cell depletion with rituximab, and the potential role of the B-cell regulatory cytokine BAFF in chronic GVHD is also discussed. Finally, the emerging role of resident skin and gut bacterial flora-the so-called microbiome-in the pathogenesis of GVHD is covered.

EXPERT OPINION

Current methods of acute GVHD prevention are highly successful, and a number of investigational approaches promise to further reduce the risk of this complication. By contrast, chronic GVHD is more poorly understood and more difficult to prevent. Future studies are required to delineate the roles of these approaches and to abrogate GVHD without sacrificing the beneficial immunologic graft-vs.-tumor effect.