Myeloablative reduced-toxicity i.v. busulfan-fludarabine and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome in the sixth through eighth decades of life

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Management of Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Retrospective, Current, and Future Perspective

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal disorder that affects hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), primarily occurring in the elderly population. Lower-risk MDS is characterized by a decrease in blood cells, whereas higher-risk MDS is associated with an increased risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Currently, the treatment of MDS is still unsatisfactory, although demethylating agents, azacitidine (AZA), and decitabine (Dec) have been successfully used to treat MDS and improve survival rates. However, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative treatment for MDS patients, effectively increasing patient survival and quality of life. Nevertheless, treatment-related toxicity, graft-versus-host disease, infectious complications, and relapse are still major post-transplant issues. In this review, through a retrospective analysis of past and present HSCT for the treatment of MDS, we provide insights for the future.

Busulfan Plus Fludarabine Compared With Busulfan Plus Cyclophosphamide for AML Undergoing HLA-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial

PURPOSE

The busulfan plus fludarabine (BuFlu) conditioning regimen has lower transplant-related mortality (TRM) than busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (BuCy) in HLA-matched transplantation. We aimed to compare outcomes of the BuFlu regimen with those of the BuCy regimen in HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT).

METHODS

We performed an open-label, randomized phase III trial at 12 hospitals in China. Eligible patients with AML (18-65 years) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive BuFlu (busulfan 0.8 mg/kg four times per day on days -6 to -3; fludarabine 30 mg/m2 once daily on days -7 to -3) or BuCy (same dose of busulfan; cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg once daily on days -3 and -2). The primary end point was 1-year TRM in the intention-to-treat population and safety in the per-protocol population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02487069) and is complete.

RESULTS

From November 20, 2015, to September 30, 2019, 386 patients were randomly assigned to receive the BuFlu (n = 194) or BuCy (n = 192) regimen. The median follow-up was 55.0 (IQR, 46.5-69.0) months after random assignment. The 1-year TRM was 7.2% (95% CI, 4.1 to 11.4) and 14.1% (95% CI, 9.6 to 19.4; hazard ratio [HR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.97; P = .041), the 5-year relapse was 17.9% (95% CI, 9.6 to 28.3) and 14.2% (95% CI, 9.1 to 20.5; HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.95; P = .670), and the 5-year overall survival was 72.5% (95% CI, 62.2 to 80.4) and 68.2% (95% CI, 58.9 to 75.9; HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.26; P = .465) in two groups, respectively. Grade 3 regimen-related toxicity (RRT) was reported for 0 of 191 patients following the BuFlu regimen and 9 (4.7%) of 190 patients following the BuCy regimen (P = .002). At least one type of grade 3-5 adverse event was reported for 130 (68.1%) of the 191 patients and 147 (77.4%) of the 190 patients in two groups, respectively (P = .041).

CONCLUSION

The BuFlu regimen has a lower TRM and RRT and similar relapse for patients with AML undergoing haplo-HCT compared with the BuCy regimen.

Effects of combined test dose and therapeutic drug monitoring strategy in exposure-directed busulfan

Although exposure-directed busulfan (BU) dosing can improve allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation outcomes, there is still large variability in BU exposure with test dose alone due to changes in BU clearance caused by drug interactions. We conducted a single-arm phase II trial using the combined test dose and therapeutic drug monitoring strategy (PK-guided group) and compared the outcomes with an external historical cohort receiving a fixed-dose (fixed-dose group). The first eight and second eight doses were adjusted based on the area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of the test and first doses, respectively, targeting a total AUC of 82.1 mg·h/L. All patients received either BU and cyclophosphamide conditioning (BU/CY) or fludarabine (FLU)-containing conditioning. The BU clearance at the first dose decreased more in patients receiving FLU than in those receiving BU/CY; however, BU clearance also declined over time in patients who received BU/CY. The simulated total AUC (sAUC) with test dose only was significantly higher in patients who received FLU than in those who received BU/CY, but sAUC with the combined strategy was comparable. The 100-day progression-free survival was 85.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71.9-92.8%), and was not inferior to that in the fixed-dose group. For the FLU-containing regimens, the PK-guided group showed decreased relapse (0.0% vs. 26.9%, p = 0.03), and favorable overall survival (75.1% vs. 57.0%, p = 0.07) at 1 year. The combined strategy effectively controlled the BU exposure close to the target levels, potentially improving efficacy, especially in patients receiving the FLU-containing regimen. Clinical evaluation of efficacy of dose-modified intravenous busulfan in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancy (#UMIN000014077, June 15th, 2014).

Low Incidence of Relapse with a Moderate Conditioning Regimen of Fludarabine, Busulfan, and Melphalan for Patients with Myeloid Malignancies: A Single-Center Analysis of 100 Patients

Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with standard myeloablative conditioning regimens such as fludarabine (Flu) and busulfan (Bu) remains a major concern in patients with myeloid malignancies. A low relapse rate has been reported when thiotepa or melphalan (Mel) is added to Flu-Bu, but at a possible increased risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Here we evaluated the outcomes of 100 patients (70 with acute myeloid leukemia, 23 with myelodysplastic syndrome, 4 with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and 3 with granulocytic sarcoma) who underwent their first allo-HSCT after a moderate-dose FBM conditioning regimen consisting of Flu 150 mg/m2, Bu 6.4 mg/kg, and Mel 140 mg/m2 (n = 69), with Mel 100 mg/m2 for patients age >55 years and/or with a Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) ≥3 (n = 31). Donors were HLA-matched siblings (n = 19), matched unrelated donors (n = 4), and haploidentical donors (n = 77). The majority of patients (88%) had an intermediate or high Disease Risk Index. Out of 96 evaluable patients, 94 achieved neutrophil engraftment and had full donor chimerism on day +30 post-transplantation. After a median follow-up of 468 days (range, 55 to 1039 days), only 4 patients relapsed, with a 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) of 5.3% ± 3.6%. The 100-day and 2-year NRM were 6.8% ± 4.4% and 12.3% ± 3.6%, respectively. At the last follow-up, the 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 82.4% ± 4.2% and 80.3% ± 6.0%, respectively. Comparing the transplantation outcomes between patients receiving Mel 100 mg/m2 and those receiving Mel 140 mg/m2, showed no significant differences in NRM and CIR between the 2 groups and similar 2-year DFS and OS in the 2 groups, although the Mel 100 group had a higher median age (58 years versus 42 years; P < .001) and a higher percentage of patients with an HCT-CI ≥3 (P = .005). In the total cohort, the sole independent factor associated with transplantation outcomes was HCT-CI ≥3, which correlated with higher NRM and inferior DFS and OS. Our study suggests that moderate-intensity FBM conditioning is feasible for patients with myeloid malignancies, with a low relapse rate without increased NRM. A lower Mel dose of 100 mg/m2 maintained the low risk of relapse without excess NRM in older adults. However, the FBM regimen should be used with caution in patients with high-risk HCT-CI (≥3).

Conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: Real-world data from the Japanese registry studies

Conditioning regimens play a crucial role in preventing relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In early times, myeloablative conditioning was used exclusively, but it was associated with significant toxicity. However, the advent of reduced-intensity conditioning has allowed allogeneic HCT to be performed more safely, leading to an expansion of our choices for conditioning regimens. As the transplantation methods have become highly diversified, it is reasonable to determine an optimal conditioning regimen in consideration of patient-, disease-, and transplantation-related factors. In this context, large-scale registry-based studies provide real-world data to allow for a detailed evaluation of the utility of individual conditioning regimens in specific clinical settings. The Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy has been conducting a nationwide survey for HCT since 1993 that currently covers >99% of all the transplantation centers nationwide, and >1,000 allogeneic HCTs performed for adults with AML are registered per year. We have been using the registry data to implement a number of studies focusing on adults with AML, and the large number of patients registered consecutively from nearly all transplantation centers nationwide represent real-world practice in Japan. This article reviews and discusses the results obtained from our registry-based studies pertaining to various conditioning regimens.

Evolving Therapeutic Approaches for Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in 2021

Simple Summary

The better understanding of disease biology, the availability of new effective drugs and the increased awareness of patients’ heterogeneity in terms of fitness and personal expectations has made the current treatment paradigm of AML in the elderly very challenging. Here, we discuss the evolving criteria used to define eligibility for induction chemotherapy and transplantation, the introduction of new agents in the treatment of patients with very different clinical conditions, the implications of precision medicine and the importance of quality of life and supportive care, proposing a simplified algorithm that we follow in 2021.

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older patients is characterized by unfavorable prognosis due to adverse disease features and a high rate of treatment-related complications. Classical therapeutic options range from intensive chemotherapy in fit patients, potentially followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), to hypomethylating agents or palliative care alone for unfit/frail ones. In the era of precision medicine, the treatment paradigm of AML is rapidly changing. On the one hand, a plethora of new targeted drugs with good tolerability profiles are becoming available, offering the possibility to achieve a prolonged remission to many patients not otherwise eligible for more intensive therapies. On the other hand, better tools to assess patients’ fitness and improvements in the selection and management of those undergoing allo-HCT will hopefully reduce treatment-related mortality and complications. Importantly, a detailed genetic characterization of AML has become of paramount importance to choose the best therapeutic option in both intensively treated and unfit patients. Finally, improving supportive care and quality of life is of major importance in this age group, especially for the minority of patients that are still candidates for palliative care because of very poor clinical conditions or unwillingness to receive active treatments. In the present review, we discuss the evolving approaches in the treatment of older AML patients, which is becoming increasingly challenging following the advent of new effective drugs for a very heterogeneous and complex population.

UPLC-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Quantification of Busulfan in Human Plasma: Application to Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Busulfan (Bu) is an alkylating agent commonly used in preparative regimens for hematologic malignant and non-malignant patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The objective of the present study was to develop an UPLC-MS/MS method for quantification of Bu in human plasma. A total of 55 patients with hematologic malignancies (n = 34) and non- malignancies (n = 21) received myeloablative Bu therapy prior to HSCT. A tandem mass spectrometric method was developed and validated to quantify Bu levels in these patients. The method was fully validated over the concentration range of 25–2000 ng/mL (r > 0.99). The assay method demonstrated good precision and accuracy. Stability studies indicated that the drug was stable in various conditions. Incurred sample reanalysis findings were within acceptable ranges (<15% of the nominal concentration). Based on the 1^st dose AUC results, one third of hematologic malignant patients and half of non-malignant patients needed dose adjustment. However, in subsequent doses (5^th, 9^th, and 13^th), 77%, 82% and 82%, respectively, of hematologic malignant patients and 71%, 67% and 86%, respectively, of non-malignant patients achieved the target range of Bu AUC. The suitability of the developed method for routine TDM of Bu in HSCT patients was demonstrated. The study suggests that the pharmacokinetic profile of Bu varies in both groups.

Allogeneic Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplants in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Prepared with Busulfan and Fludarabine (BUFLU) or Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Fludarabine (TBF): A Retrospective Study

This is a multicenter retrospective comparison of 2 myeloablative conditioning regimens in 454 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission: busulfan (4 days) and fludarabine (BUFLU) versus thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine (TBF). Eligible for this study were patients allografted between January 2008 and December 2018 in 10 transplant centers, with AML in first or second remission: 201 patients received BUFLU, whereas 253 received TBF. The 2 groups (BUFLU and TBF) were comparable for age (P = .13) and adverse AML risk factors (P = .3). The TBF group had more second remissions and more haploidentical grafts. The donor type included HLA-identical siblings, unrelated donors, and family haploidentical donors. The 5-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 19% for BUFLU and 22% for TBF (P = .8), and the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 30% and 15%, respectively (P = .0004). The 5-year actuarial survival was 51% for BUFLU and 68% for TBF (P = .002). In a multivariate Cox analysis, after correcting for confounding factors, the use of TBF reduced the risk of relapse compared with BUFLU (P = .03) and the risk of death (P = .03). In a matched pair analysis of 108 BUFLU patients matched with 108 TBF patients, with the exclusion of haploidentical grafts, TBF reduced the risk of relapse (P = .006) and there was a trend for improved survival (P = .07). Superior survival of patients receiving TBF as compared with BUFLU is due to a reduced risk of relapse, with comparable NRM. The survival advantage is independent of donor type and AML risk factors.

Clinical outcomes in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A comparison between young and elderly patients. Observational study

OBJECTIVES

To analyse clinical outcomes comparing two age groups of patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), and to identify risk factors associated with older patients' mortality.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, the medical charts of all consecutive patients admitted in one hospital for allo-HSCT were reviewed. Overall survival (OS) and other outcomes were compared between patients aged up to 55 years (YG) and older than 55 (EG).

RESULTS

From January 2007 to August 2014, 111 adult patients were admitted for allo-HSCT and were included 75 in the YG and 36 in the EG group. The OS rate at D+ 100 was 84% for YG individuals in contrast to 75% in the EG (p = 0.01), and 71% vs. 50% at one year after HSCT (p = 0.01) respectively. Therapy-related mortality (TRM) rates for the YG and EG were, respectively, 14% vs. 17% (p = 0.04) at D+ 100 and 17% vs. 32% (p = 0.04) at one year. Haploidentical donor type and active disease status significantly increased mortality risk in the EG (hazard ratio 2.42; p = 0.018; and 2.04; p = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

YG and EG have similar TRM rates early after allo-HSCT, but the elderly had higher TRM during the critical period from 100 days to one year.

Intravenous Busulfan Compared with Treosulfan-Based Conditioning for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Study on Behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Dose intensity of the conditioning regimen has significant impact on the outcomes after stem cell transplantation (SCT) for acute myeloid leukemia. Most studies have shown more relapse, less nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and similar overall survival after reduced-intensity and myeloablative conditioning. There are limited data on the dose equivalence and expected outcomes of treosulfan-based compared with busulfan-based conditioning. We compared SCT outcomes after fludarabine with either intravenous busulfan at a myeloablative dose (FB4, 12.8 mg/kg, n = 1265) or a reduced dose (FB2, 6.4 mg/kg, n = 1456) or treosulfan at 42 g/m² (FT14, n = 403) or 36 g/m² (FT12, n = 168). Median patient age was 48, 60, 57, and 60 years in the FB4, FB2, FT14, and FT12 groups, respectively (P < .0001). Two-year overall survival was 58%, 53%, 53%, and 51%, respectively (P = .25). Multivariate analysis identified advanced age, advanced disease status, and secondary leukemia to be associated with worse survival. Relapse rate was 30%, 35%, 34%, and 40%, respectively. Relapse was more common after FB2, advanced age and disease status, secondary leukemia, and sibling donors. NRM was 17%, 18%, 21%, and 16%, respectively. NRM was least common after FT12 and more common with advanced age and disease status and unrelated donors. Treosulfan-based regimens were associated with lower rates of graft-versus-host disease. There was no difference in any outcome among patients in first complete remission at transplantation. However, there was better survival with treosulfan-based conditioning in advanced leukemia. In conclusion, survival is determined mostly by disease biology and is similar after various regimens. Treosulfan-based conditioning is more similar to myeloablative than to reduced-intensity conditioning but can be administered safely in older patients, with lower rates of graft-versus-host disease and possibly better outcomes in patients with active leukemia.

T Cell Depletion as an Alternative Approach for Patients 55 Years or Older Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation as Curative Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies

T cell-depleted (TCD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is curative treatment for hematologic malignancies in adults, shown to reduce graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) without increased relapse. We retrospectively reviewed a single-center, 11-year experience of 214 patients aged ≥ 55 years to determine tolerability and efficacy in the older adult. Most patients (70%) had myeloid diseases, and most acute leukemias were in remission. Median age was 61 years, with related and unrelated donors ≥8/10 HLA matched. Hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index scores were intermediate and high for 84%. Conditioning regimens were all myeloablative. Grafts were peripheral blood stem cells (97%) containing CD3 dose ≤103-4/kg body weight, without pharmacologic GVHD prophylaxis. With median follow-up of 70 months among survivors, Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall and relapse-free survival were 44% and 41%, respectively (4 years). Cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality at day +100 was only 10%. Incidence of GVHD for acute (grades II to IV) was 9% at day +100 and for chronic was 7% at 2 and 4 years (8 extensive, 1 overlap). Median Karnofsky performance status for patients > 2 years post-transplant was 90%. As 1 of the largest reports for patients ≥2 aged ≥55 years receiving TCD HSCTs, it demonstrates curative therapy with minimal GVHD, similar to that observed in a younger population.

Reduced intensity conditioning of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia in patients older than 50 years of age: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to explore the efficacy and safety of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with a reduced intensity conditioning regimen in elderly patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

METHODS

Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were established as the primary endpoints for directly assessing the efficacy, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) for safety. The eligible patients were at or above 50 years of age, and the outcomes of the typical elderly patients (≥60 years) were analyzed individually.

RESULTS

The pooled estimates (95% confidence interval (CI)) for 1-year OS, EFS and NRM were 65 (55-74)  %, 50 (44-55)  % and 26 (21-30)  %, respectively; as for the patients ≥60 years of age, these were 63 (53-72) %, 46 (41-50)  % and 28 (23-32) %, respectively. No significantly statistical difference achieved between MDS and AML patients in 1-year EFS and NRM [relative risk (RR) 0.91, 95% CI 0.80-1.04; P = 0.172 and RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.82-1.69; P = 0.365]. The patients with lower diseases risk had the possibility of higher OS rate at ≥ 3 years than those with higher diseases risk (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.95-1.97; P = 0.088). The patients had significantly higher 2-year OS and EFS rates in complete remission (CR, CR1 and CR2) at transplantation compared to those with advanced diseases (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

RIC-alloHSCT is a feasible treatment option for the patients older than 50 year of age with MDS and AML. Advanced diseases status and higher diseases risk may be the poor factors for prognosis.

Impact of Fluid Overload as New Toxicity Category on Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Outcomes

Fluid overload (FO) commonly occurs during hospitalization for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We hypothesized that FO is associated with transplantation outcomes and evaluated this complication in 2 cohorts of patients. FO was graded based on post-transplantation weight gain, symptoms, and need for treatment, scored in real time by an independent team. The first cohort (study cohort; n = 145) underwent haploidentical transplantation for hematologic malignancies following a melphalan-based conditioning regimen. In univariate analysis, factors associated with day +100 nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were FO grade ≥2 (hazard ratio [HR], 15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2 to 55; P < .001), creatinine >1 mg/dL (HR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.6 to 14; P = .005), and age >55 years (HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.5 to 13; P = .008). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with day +100 NRM were FO grade ≥2 (HR, 13.1; 95% CI, 3.4 to 50; P < .001) and serum creatinine level >1 mg/dL at transplantation admission (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 11; P = .03). These findings were verified in a separate cohort (validation cohort) of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome who underwent HLA-matched transplantation with busulfan-based conditioning (n = 449). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with day +100 NRM were FO grade ≥2 (HR, 34; 95% CI, 7.2 to 158; P < .001) and, in patients with FO grade <2, advanced disease status (HR, 5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 22; P = .03). A higher NRM translated to significantly poorer 1-year overall survival rates for patients with FO ≥2 than for patients without FO (70% versus 42%, P < .001 in the study cohort and 64% versus 38%, P < .001 in the validation cohort). In conclusion, FO grade ≥2 is strongly associated with higher NRM and shorter survival and should be considered an important prognostic factor in transplantation.

Impact of in vivo T cell depletion in HLA-identical allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission conditioned with a fludarabine iv-busulfan myeloablative regimen: a report from the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party

Background

The impact of the use of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in allogeneic stem cell transplantation performed with HLA-identical sibling donors following fludarabine and 4 days intravenous busulfan myeloablative conditioning regimen has been poorly explored.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 566 patients who underwent a first HLA-identical allogeneic stem cell transplantation with this conditioning regimen for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission between 2006 and 2013 and compared the outcomes of 145 (25.6%) patients who received ATG (ATG group) to 421 (74.4%) who did not (no-ATG group). The Kaplan-Meier estimator, the cumulative incidence function, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used where appropriate.

Results

Patients in the ATG group were older, received more frequently peripheral blood stem cell grafts from older donors, and were transplanted more recently. With a median follow-up of 19 months, patients in the ATG group had reduced 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (31 vs. 52%, p = 0.0002) and of its extensive form (8 vs. 26%, p < 0.0001) but similar relapse incidence (22 vs. 27%, p = 0.23) leading to improved GVHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS) (60 vs. 40%, p = 0.0001). In multivariate analyses, the addition of ATG was independently associated with lower chronic GVHD (HR = 0.46, p = 0.0001), improved leukemia-free survival (HR = 0.67, p = 0.027), overall survival (HR = 0.65, p = 0.027), and GRFS (HR = 0.51, p = 4 × 10⁻⁵). Recipient age above 50 years was the only other factor associated with worse survivals.

Conclusions

These results suggest that the use of ATG with fludarabine and 4 days intravenous busulfan followed by HLA-identical sibling donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia improves overall transplant outcomes due to reduced incidence of chronic GVHD without increased relapse risk.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13045-016-0389-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Brazilian guidelines on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) accounts for 90% of all cases of acute leukemia in adults. In Brazil, the mortality from myeloid leukemia is 1.74/100 000 men and 1.37/100 000 women. Our aim was to review and update guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation on indications of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for the treatment AML.

CONCLUSIONS

(i) Allo-HSCT is recommended for high-risk AML (IA); (ii) allo-HSCT is recommended for AML of intermediate risk (IA); (iii) allo-HSCT is recommended for AML relapsed/refractory (C4); (iv) auto-HSCT is recommended for AML after 1 consolidation (C4); (v) auto-HSCT is recommended for AML in CR1 (higher than QT in the Brazilian experience) (C4); (vi) auto-HSCT is accepted for AML M3 in second molecular complete remission (2B); (vii) peripheral blood instead of Bone Marrow HSC for advanced disease (2A); (viii) recommended conditioning protocols: Bu-Cy/Bu-Mel, Bu-Flu, TBI-Cy. In umbilical cord HSCT, consider ATG-based protocols (2A); (ix) allogeneic HSCT for the treatment of AML can be used in patients between 60 and 80 yr with good performance status and the absence of significant comorbidities (C4).

Toxicity and efficacy of busulfan and fludarabine myeloablative conditioning for HLA-identical sibling allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in AML and MDS

The safety and efficacy of a 4-day myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen consisting of Bu 3.2 mg/kg and fludarabine 40 mg/m(2)/day for HLA-identical sibling allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in myeloid malignancies was investigated in 133 patients (median age, 47 years; range 19-74 years) with de novo AML (60%), secondary AML (20%) or myelodysplastic syndrome (20%). All patients engrafted. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease occurred in five patients (4%), and severe toxicities, mostly mucositis, occurred in twenty-three (17%) patients. The non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days was 1.5%. The incidences of acute GVHD grade 2-4 and grade 3-4 were 32 and 13%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 38 months, the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 67%. The relapse incidence was 30% (27 and 31%, respectively, in patients with early- and late-stage disease), and the overall NRM was 15%. The actuarial 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 54 and 62%, respectively. Patients aged <50 years had better outcomes compared with older patients (DFS 64 vs 42%, P=0.006; OS 73 vs 47%, P<0.001, respectively).

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide versus conventional graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in mismatched unrelated donor haematopoietic cell transplantation

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is an effective strategy to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after haploidentical haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We determined the efficacy of PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis in human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) HCT. We analysed 113 adult patients with high-risk haematological malignancies who underwent one-antigen MMUD transplantation between 2009 and 2013. Of these, 41 patients received PTCy, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for GVHD prophylaxis; 72 patients received conventional prophylaxis with anti-thymocyte globulin, tacrolimus and methotrexate. Graft source was primarily bone marrow (83% PTCy vs. 63% conventional group). Incidence of grade II-IV (37% vs. 36%, P = 0·8) and grade III-IV (17% vs. 12%, P = 0·5) acute GVHD was similar at day 100. However, the incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD by day 30 was significantly lower in the PTCy group (0% vs. 15%, P = 0·01). Median time to neutrophil (18 days vs. 12 days, P < 0·001) and platelet (25·5 days vs. 18 days, P = 0·05) engraftment was prolonged in PTCy group. Rates of graft failure, chronic GVHD, 2-year non-relapse mortality, relapse, progression-free survival or overall survival were similar. Our results demonstrate that PTCy, tacrolimus and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis is safe and produced similar results as conventional prophylaxis in patients with one antigen HLA-MMUD HCT.

The efficacy and safety of a new reduced-toxicity conditioning with 4 days of once-daily 100 mg/m(2) intravenous busulfan associated with fludarabine and antithymocyte globulins prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome or acute leukemia

The optimal intensity of myeloablation associated with a reduced-toxicity conditioning (RTC) regimen in order to decrease the relapse rate without increasing non-relapse mortality (NRM), is not well established yet. This retrospective analysis was done on 30 patients with hematological malignancies. The aim was to assess the safety of a RTC regimen based on the busulfan at a dose of 100 mg/m(2)/d intravenously for 4 d, fludarabine at a dose of 30 mg/m(2)/d for 5 d, and anti-thymoglobulins at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg/d for 2 d. The cumulative incidences of grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and all grades chronic GVHD were 37% and 42%, respectively. Median 1-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 66% and 50%, respectively. At 1 year, the cumulative incidence of relapse/disease progression was 33%. NRM was 3% and 17% at day 100 and 1 year, respectively. This RTC conditioning regimen can lead to a long-term disease control. Moreover, it appears to be safe with a low NRM rate among high-risk patients.

Reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission - a review from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

Acute myeloid leukemia is the most common indication for an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. The introduction of reduced intensity conditioning has expanded the recipient pool for transplantation, which has importantly made transplant an option for the more commonly affected older age groups. Reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation is currently the standard of care for patients with intermediate or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia and is now most often employed in older patients and those with medical comorbidities. Despite being curative for a significant proportion of patients, post-transplant relapse remains a challenge in the reduced intensity conditioning setting. Herein we discuss the studies that demonstrate the feasibility of reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplants, compare the outcomes of reduced intensity conditioning versus chemotherapy and conventional myeloablative conditioning regimens, describe the optimal donor and stem cell source, and consider the impact of post-remission consolidation, comorbidities, center experience, and more intensive (reduced toxicity conditioning) regimens on outcomes. Additionally, we discuss the need for further prospective studies to optimize transplant outcomes.

Combination Therapy for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis with Etanercept and Extracorporeal Photopheresis: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens minimize early toxicity after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) by placing greater reliance on establishing a graft-versus-leukemia effect (GVL). Because graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and GVL are tightly linked, inhibition of T cell populations that cause GVHD may lead to an unintended increased risk of relapse in the RIC setting. Although not completely understood, etanercept and extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) are thought to ameliorate GVHD without direct T cell inhibition. We hypothesized that adding these 2 agents to a standard GVHD prophylaxis regimen of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) would improve survival by reducing GVHD-related mortality without increasing relapse rates. Therefore, we conducted a prospective phase II clinical trial that incorporated tacrolimus, MMF, etanercept, and ECP as GVHD prophylaxis in 48 patients undergoing RIC unrelated donor transplantation. The preferred RIC was fludarabine 160 mg/m(2) + busulfan 6.4 mg/kg to 12.8 mg/kg ± total body irradiation 200 cGy. Etanercept .4 mg/kg (maximum dose, 25 mg) was given subcutaneously twice weekly for 8 weeks after HCT and ECP was given for 12 treatments, starting weekly on day 28 weekly and tapering off by day 180. The median age of the study patients was 60 (range, 18 to 71) years. Donors were 7/8 (n = 14, 29%) or 8/8 (n = 34, 71%) HLA matched. All patients engrafted neutrophils at a median of 12 days. The cumulative incidence of grades II to IV acute GVHD at day 100 was 46%, but it was typically sensitive to initial steroid treatment (84% day 56 complete response/partial response rate). Overall survival at 1 year in this older, frequently mismatched unrelated donor setting was excellent (73%) because of low rates of nonrelapse mortality (21%) and relapse (19%). However, this strategy was not effective at preventing a high incidence of chronic GVHD and late deaths led to a drop in 2-year survival, declining to 56%, reflecting a high incidence of chronic GVHD.

Busulfan fludarabine vs busulfan cyclophosphamide as a preparative regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity profile of busulfan-fludarabine (Bu-Flu) compared with busulfan-cyclophosphamide (Bu-Cy) as a preparative regimen for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all comparative trials, both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized. Our search yielded 15 trials recruiting 1830 patients. Four trials were RCTs and 11 were either one-arm intervention trials compared with historical controls or retrospective studies. There was a lower risk for non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days in patients given Bu-Flu regimen compared with those given Bu-Cy regimen (relative risk (RR) 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.92, 8 trials); however, there were no differences in all-cause mortality at 100 days (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.56-1.30, 9 trials) and at the end of study (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.64-1.02, 13 trials). The risks of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) and microbiologically documented infections were lower in patients given Bu-Flu regimen (RR 0.34; 95% CI 0.19-0.62, 8 trials and RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.64-0.97, 2 trials, respectively); however, risk for SOS was no longer lower when performing sensitivity analysis according to RCTs. Engraftment kinetics, risk of grade 3-4 mucositis, GvHD, relapse and NRM at the end of the study were all similar between the two groups. We conclude that both regimens have similar efficacy profiles, whereas toxicity is lower with the Bu-Flu regimen.

Pushing the envelope-nonmyeloablative and reduced intensity preparative regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was originally developed to allow delivery of myeloablative doses of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. With better understanding of disease pathophysiology, the graft vs malignancy (GVM) effect of allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation and toxicities associated with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens, the focus shifted to developing less toxic conditioning regimens to reduce treatment-related morbidity without compromising survival. Although HCT with MAC is preferred to reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) for most patients ⩽60 years with AML/myelodysplastic syndrome and ALL, RIC and nonmyeloablative (NMA) regimens allow HCT for many otherwise ineligible patients. Reduced intensity preparative regimens have produced high rates of PFS for diagnoses, which are highly sensitive to GVM. Relapse of the malignancy is the major cause of treatment failure with RIC/NMA HCT. Incorporation of novel agents like bortezomib or lenalidomide, addition of cellular immunotherapy and use of targeted radiation therapies could further improve outcome. In this review, we discuss commonly used RIC/NMA regimens and promising novel regimens.

Patient age, remission status and HCT-CI in a combined score are prognostic for patients with AML undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in CR1 and CR2

For AML, older age, advanced disease and increased hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index (HCT-CI) are associated with worse prognosis following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). This single-center retrospective study investigated the influence of pre-transplant characteristics on outcomes of 387 patients undergoing allogeneic HCT for AML in CR1 and CR2. The multivariable analysis model for overall survival (OS) included age (hazard ratio (HR)=2.24 for ages 31-64 years and HR=3.23 for age ⩾65 years compared with age ⩽30 years, P=0.003), remission status (HR=1.49 for CR2 compared with CR1, P=0.005) and HCT-CI score (HR=1.47 for ⩾3 compared with <3, P=0.005). Transplant year was significantly associated with OS (P=0.001) but this did not influence the model. A weighted score was developed with age ⩽30, CR1 and HCT-CI score <3 receiving 0 points each, and CR2 and HCT-CI score ⩾3 receiving 1 point each. Ages 31-64 received 2 points, age ⩾65 received 3 points. Scores were grouped as follows: scores 0-1 (low risk, n=36), score 2 (intermediate-low risk, n=147), score 3 (intermediate-high risk, n=141) and scores 4-5 (high risk, n=63) with 3-year OS of 71%, 55%, 42% and 29% for scores 0-1, 2, 3 and 4-5, respectively (P<0.0001). The score predicted nonrelapse mortality (P=0.03) but not cumulative incidence of relapse (P=0.18). This model should be validated for the pre-HCT assessment of AML patients in CR1 and CR2.

Higher busulfan dose intensity appears to improve leukemia-free and overall survival in AML allografted in CR2: An analysis from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a potentially curative treatment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Recent advances in the field of hematopoietic cell allografting have resulted in a practice shift, favoring less intense preparative regimens. We present results of a retrospective comparative analysis of two preparative regimens, namely FB2 (IV fludarabine plus IV busulfan 6.4mg/kg±10%) and FB4 (IV fludarabine plus IV busulfan 12.8mg/kg ±10%), in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing hematopoietic cell allografting in second complete remission at EBMT participating centers. Between 2003 and 2010, 128 AML patients in second complete remission were allografted following a preparative regimen of FB2 (n=88) or FB4 (n=40). The median time-to-neutrophil engraftment was similar whether patients received FB2 (16 (5-38) days) or FB4 (16 (9-29) days), p=0.45. A multivariate analysis showed that use of FB4 resulted in improved 2-year leukemia-free (HR=0.44 (95%CI=0.21, 0.94), p=0.03) and overall survival (HR=0.38 (95%CI=0.16, 0.86), p=0.02). Cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (2-year) for all patients was 21% (95%CI=14-28%). Our analysis suggests that FB4 improves 2-year leukemia-free and overall survival in AML allografted in second complete remission. A confirmatory randomized controlled trial that compares these two preparative regimens (FB2 vs. FB4) in AML in CR2 is definitely warranted.

Allogeneic transplantation with myeloablative FluBu4 conditioning improves survival compared to reduced intensity FluBu2 conditioning for acute myeloid leukemia in remission

The optimal intensity of conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains undefined. Traditionally, myeloablative conditioning regimens improve disease control, but at the risk of greater nonrelapse mortality. Because fludarabine with myeloablative doses of intravenous busulfan using pharmacokinetic monitoring has excellent tolerability, we reasoned that this regimen would limit relapse without substantially elevating toxicity when compared to reduced intensity conditioning. We retrospectively analyzed 148 consecutive AML patients in remission receiving T cell replete HCT conditioned with fludarabine and intravenous busulfan at doses defined as reduced (6.4 mg/kg; FluBu2, n = 63) or myeloablative (12.8 mg/kg; FluBu4, n = 85). Early and late nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was similar among FluBu4 and FluBu2 recipients, respectively (day + 100: 4 vs 0 %; 5 years: 19 vs 22 %; p = 0.54). NRM did not differ between FluBu4 and FluBu2 in patients >50 years of age (24 vs 22 %, p = 0.75). Relapse was lower in recipients of FluBu4 (5 years: 30 vs 49 %; p = 0.04), especially in patients with poor risk cytogenetics (22 vs 59 %; p = 0.02) and those >50 years of age (28 vs 51 %; p = 0.02). Overall survival favored FluBu4 recipients at 5 years (53 vs 34 %, p = 0.02), a finding confirmed in multivariate analysis (HR: 0.57; 95 % CI: 0.34-0.95; p = 0.03). These data suggest that myeloablative FluBu4 may provide equivalent NRM, reduced relapse, and improved survival compared to FluBu2, emphasizing the importance of busulfan dose in conditioning for AML.

Reduced-intensity conditioned allogeneic SCT in adults with AML

AML is currently the most common indication for reduced-intensity conditioned (RIC) allo-SCT. Reduced-intensity regimens allow a potent GVL response to occur with minimized treatment-related toxicity in patients of older age or with comorbidities that preclude the use of myeloablative conditioning. Whether RIC SCT is appropriate for younger and more standard risk patients is not well defined and the field is changing rapidly; a prospective randomized trial of myeloablative vs RIC (BMT-CTN 0901) was recently closed when early results indicated better outcomes for myeloablative regimens. However, detailed results are not available, and all patients in that study were eligible for myeloablative conditioning. RIC transplants will likely remain the standard of care as many patients with AML are not eligible for myeloablative conditioning. Recent publication of mature results from retrospective and prospective cohorts provide contemporary efficacy and toxicity data for these attenuated regimens. In addition, recent studies explore the use of alternative donors, introduce regimens that attempt to reduce toxicity without reducing intensity, and identify predictive factors that pave the way to personalized approaches. These studies paint a picture of the future of RIC transplants. Here we review the current status of RIC allogeneic SCT in AML.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: are we closer to knowing who needs it?

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a very heterogeneous disease. Prognosis is related not only to intrinsic characteristics such as cytogenetics and molecular markers, but also the patient's ability to tolerate therapy, and treatment response. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has been traditionally indicated for poor-risk disease in first complete remission (CR1) or for treatment of relapsed or refractory AML. 'Poor-risk' disease is now better defined due to genetic subtyping, particularly in chromosomally normal AML. In addition, the presence of comorbid conditions should be included in the decision-making process. Improvements in supportive care and the use of modern conditioning regimens have been associated with improved outcomes, mostly due to a reduction in treatment-related mortality. Therefore, a significant proportion of patients with AML-CR1 can potentially benefit from allo-HCT. We give general guidelines on how to incorporate cytogenetic and molecular risk factors, donor selection, and patient characteristics in order to determine when allo-HCT should be indicated in CR1.

Low non-relapse mortality and long-term preserved quality of life in older patients undergoing matched related donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a prospective multicenter phase II trial

Allogeneic transplantation is a challenge in patients of advanced age because of a high risk of non-relapse mortality and potential long-lasting impairment of health-related quality of life. The development of reduced-intensity conditioning regimens has allowed the use of allogeneic transplantation in this population, but the optimal regimen remains undefined. We conducted a multicenter phase II trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen combining fludarabine, intravenous busulfan, and rabbit antithymocyte globulins in patients older than 55 years of age transplanted from matched-related donor. In addition, health-related quality of life was prospectively measured. Seventy-five patients with a median age of 60 years (range 55-70) were analyzed. Grade III-IV acute and extensive chronic graft-versus-host diseases were found in 3% and 27% of patients, respectively. The day 100 and 1-year non-relapse mortality incidences were 1% and 9%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse, progression-free survival and overall survival at two years were 36%, 51% and 67%, respectively, with a median follow up of 49 months. Global health-related quality of life, physical functioning, emotional functioning, and social functioning were not impaired compared to baseline for more than 75% of the patients (75%, 81.4%, 82.3%, and 75%, respectively). Thirty-four of the 46 (74%) progression-free patients at one year were living without persistent extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease. We conclude that the reduced-intensity conditioning regimen combining fludarabine, intravenous busulfan, and rabbit antithymocyte globulins is well tolerated in patients older than 55 years with low non-relapse mortality and long-term preserved quality of life.

Effect of age on the pharmacokinetics of busulfan in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation; an alliance study (CALGB 10503, 19808, and 100103)

PURPOSE

Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome have often been excluded from myeloablative-conditioning regimens containing busulfan because of non-disease-related morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that busulfan clearance (BuCL) in older patients (>60 years) would be reduced compared to that in younger patients, potentially explaining observed differences in busulfan tolerability.

METHODS

AML patients in three CALGB hematopoietic cell transplantation studies were treated with a conditioning regimen using IV busulfan, dosed at 0.8 mg/kg. Plasma busulfan concentrations were determined by LC-MS and analyzed by non-compartmental methods. BuCL was normalized to actual (ABW), ideal (IBW), or corrected (CBW) body weight (kg). Differences in BuCL between age groups were examined using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-five patients were accrued; 174 provided useable pharmacokinetic data. Twenty-nine patients ≥ 60 years old (median 66; range 60-74) had a significantly higher BuCL versus those <60 years old (median 50; range 18-60): BuCL 236 versus 168 mL/min, p = 0.0002; BuCL/ABW 3.0 versus 2.1 mL/min/kg, p = 0.0001; BuCL/IBW 3.8 versus 2.6 mL/min/kg, p = 0.0035; BuCL/CBW 3.4 versus 2.6 mL/min/kg, p = 0.0005. Inter-patient variability in clearance (CV %) was up to 48 % in both age groups. Phenytoin administration, a potential confounder, did not affect BuCL, regardless of weight normalization (p > 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our hypothesis, BuCL was significantly higher in older patients compared to younger patients in these studies and does not explain the previously reported increase in busulfan toxicity observed in older patients.

Reduced-toxicity conditioning with fludarabine, once-daily intravenous busulfan, and antithymocyte globulins prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation: results of a multicenter prospective phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal intensity of myeloablation delivered as part of a reduced-intensity/toxicity conditioning (RIC/RTC) regimen to decrease the recurrence rate, without increasing nonrecurrence mortality (NRM), remains to be established.

METHODS

The current phase 2, prospective, multicenter trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of an RIC/RTC regimen based on busulfan at a dose of 130 mg/m(2) /day intravenously for 3 days, fludarabine at a dose of 30 mg/m(2) /day for 5 days, and antithymocyte globulins at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day for 2 days. A total of 80 patients (median age, 53 years; range, 25-64 years) with hematological malignancies were included.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 21 months (range, 12-36.5 months), the Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall and disease-free survival at 2 years were 62% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 51%-73%) and 50% (95% CI, 33%-57%), respectively. The cumulative incidences of grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD (all grades) were 29% (95% CI, 19%-39%) and 35% (95% CI, 24%-46%), respectively. At 2 years, the cumulative incidence of recurrence/disease progression and NRM were 44% (95% CI, 31%-56%) and 11% (95% CI, 6%-19%), respectively. Patient age, diagnosis, donor type, sex, presence of comorbidities, and the Hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidities index did not appear to have any statistically significant impact on NRM, recurrence/disease progression, disease-free survival, or overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The RIC/RTC regimen used in the current study appeared to be safe, with a low NRM rate at 2 years noted among high-risk patients, and efficient disease control, warranting prospective phase 3 trials.

Multi-institutional study of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as single-agent graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation using myeloablative busulfan and fludarabine conditioning

PURPOSE

The clinical safety and efficacy of intravenous busulfan and fludarabine (IV Bu/Flu) myeloablative conditioning as well as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with high-dose, post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) have been demonstrated independently in several single-institutional studies. We hypothesized that combining these two promising approaches in a multi-institutional study of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) -matched bone marrow transplantation would provide low rates of severe acute and chronic GVHD, low toxicity, and effective disease control.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-two adult patients (median age, 49 years; range, 21 to 65 years) with high-risk hematologic malignancies were enrolled at three centers (clinical trial No. NCT00809276). Forty-five patients received related allografts, and 47 received unrelated allografts. GVHD prophylaxis was solely with PTCy at 50 mg/kg/day on post-transplantation days +3 and +4.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidences of grades 2 to 4 acute, grades 3 to 4 acute, and chronic GVHD were 51%, 15%, and 14%, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days and 1 year were 9% and 16%, respectively. With a median follow-up period of 2.2 years, the 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 62% and 67%, respectively. Donor relatedness did not affect NRM, DFS, or OS. Patients in complete remission (CR) without evidence of minimal residual disease (MRD) had markedly better DFS (80%) and OS (80%) than patients in CR with MRD or with active disease at the time of transplantation (DFS, P = .0005; OS, P = .019).

CONCLUSION

This multi-institutional study demonstrates that PTCy can be safely and effectively combined with IV Bu/Flu myeloablative conditioning and confirms PTCy's efficacy as single-agent, short-course GVHD prophylaxis for both acute and chronic GVHD after bone marrow transplantation from HLA-matched donors.

Reduced-toxicity conditioning prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation improves outcome in patients with myeloid malignancies

The introduction of reduced intensity/toxicity conditioning regimens has allowed allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation to be performed in patients who were previously considered too old or otherwise unfit. Although it led to a reduction in non-relapse mortality, disease control remains a major challenge. We studied the outcome of 165 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (n=124) or myelodysplastic syndrome (n=41) transplanted after conditioning with fludarabine (30 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days), intravenous busulfan (either 260 mg/m(2): reduced intensity conditioning, or 390-520 mg/m(2): reduced toxicity conditioning), and rabbit anti-thymoglobulin (2.5 mg/kg/day for 2 days). The median age of the patients at transplantation was 56.8 years. The 2-year relapse incidence was 29% (23% versus 39% for patients transplanted in first complete remission and those transplanted beyond first complete remission, respectively; P=0.008). The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 57% (95% CI: 49.9-65). It was higher in the groups with favorable or intermediate cytogenetics than in the group with unfavorable cytogenetics (72.7%, 60.5%, and 45.7%, respectively; P=0.03). The cumulative incidence of grades 2-4 and 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease at day 100 was 19.3% and 7.9%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease at 1 year was 21.6% (severe forms: 7.8%). Non-relapse mortality at 1 year reached 11%. The 2-year overall survival rate was 61.8% (95% CI: 54.8-69.7). Unfavorable karyotype and disease status beyond first complete remission were associated with a poorer survival. This well-tolerated conditioning platform can lead to long-term disease control and offers possibilities of modulation according to disease stage or further development.