1
|
Baumrin E, Shin DB, Mitra N, Pidala J, El Jurdi N, Lee SJ, Loren AW, Gelfand JM. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Mortality in Cutaneous Chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease. JAMA Dermatol 2024; 160:393-401. [PMID: 38416506 PMCID: PMC10902778 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.6277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
Importance Chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) is associated with impaired quality of life and symptom burden. The independent association of skin involvement with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and their utility as a clinical prognostic marker remain unknown. Identification of patients with cutaneous chronic GVHD and impaired PROs could assist in initial risk stratification and treatment selection. Objective To compare the association of sclerotic and epidermal-type chronic GVHD with longitudinal PROs and to evaluate whether PROs can identify patients with cutaneous chronic GVHD at high risk for death. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter prospective cohort study involved patients from the Chronic GVHD Consortium of 9 US medical centers, enrolled between August 2007 and April 2012, and followed up until December 2020. Participants included adults 18 years and older with a diagnosis of chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppression and with skin involvement during the study period. Main Outcomes and Measures Patient-reported symptom burden was assessed using the Lee Symptom Scale (LSS) skin subscale with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. Quality of life was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplantation (FACT-BMT) instrument with lower scores indicating worse outcomes. Nonrelapse mortality, overall survival, and their association with PROs at diagnosis were also assessed. Results Among 436 patients with cutaneous chronic GVHD (median [IQR] age at transplant, 51 [41.5-56.6] years; 261 [59.9%] male), 229 patients had epidermal-type chronic GVHD (52.5%), followed by 131 with sclerotic chronic GVHD (30.0%), and 76 with combination disease (17.4%). After adjusting for confounders, patients with sclerotic chronic GVHD had mean FACT-BMT scores 6.1 points worse than those with epidermal disease (95% CI, 11.7-0.4; P = .04). Patients with combination disease had mean LSS skin subscale scores 9.0 points worse than those with epidermal disease (95% CI, 4.2-13.8; P < .001). Clinically meaningful differences were defined as at least 7 points lower for FACT-BMT and 11 points higher for LSS skin subscale. At diagnosis, clinically meaningful worsening in FACT-BMT score was associated with an adjusted odds of nonrelapse mortality increased by 9.1% (95% CI, 2.0%-16.7%; P = .01). Similarly, for clinically meaningful worsening in LSS skin subscale score, adjusted odds of nonrelapse mortality increased by 16.4% (95% CI, 5.4%-28.5%; P = .003). These associations held true after adjusting for clinical severity by the National Institutes of Health Skin Score. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this cohort study demonstrated that skin chronic GVHD was independently associated with long-term PRO impairment, with sclerotic and combination disease carrying the highest morbidity. The degree of impairment at skin chronic GVHD diagnosis was a prognostic marker for mortality. Therefore, PROs could be useful for risk stratification and treatment selection in clinical practice and clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Baumrin
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Daniel B. Shin
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Nandita Mitra
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Joseph Pidala
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Immunotherapy, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Najla El Jurdi
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Stephanie J. Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Alison W. Loren
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Joel M. Gelfand
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Im A, Pusic I, Onstad L, Kitko CL, Hamilton BK, Alousi AM, Flowers ME, Sarantopoulos S, Carpenter P, White J, Arai S, El Jurdi N, Chen G, Cutler C, Lee S, Pidala J. Patient-reported treatment response in chronic graft- versus-host disease. Haematologica 2024; 109:143-150. [PMID: 37226713 PMCID: PMC10772515 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2023.282734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) treatment response is assessed using National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria in clinical trials, and by clinician assessment in routine practice. Patient-reported treatment response is central to the experience of chronic GvHD manifestations as well as treatment benefit and toxicity, but how they correlate with clinician- or NIH-responses has not been well-studied. We aimed to characterize 6-month patientreported response, determine associated chronic GvHD baseline organ features and changes, and evaluate which patientreported quality of life and chronic GvHD symptom burden measures correlated with patient-reported response. From two nationally representative Chronic GVHD Consortium prospective observational studies, 382 subjects were included in this analysis. Patient and clinician responses were categorized as improved (completely gone, very much better, moderately better, a little better) versus not improved (about the same, a little worse, moderately worse, very much worse). At six months, 270 (71%) patients perceived chronic GvHD improvement, while 112 (29%) perceived no improvement. Patient-reported response had limited correlation with either clinician-reported (kappa 0.37) or NIH chronic GvHD response criteria (kappa 0.18). Notably, patient-reported response at six months was significantly associated with subsequent failure-free survival. In multivariate analysis, NIH responses in eye, mouth, and lung had significant association with 6-month patient-reported response, as well as a change in Short Form 36 general health and role physical domains and Lee Symptom Score skin and eye changes. Based on these findings, patient-reported responses should be considered as an important complementary endpoint in chronic GvHD clinical trials and drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Im
- University of Pittsburgh/UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Iskra Pusic
- Division of Medicine and Oncology, Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Lynn Onstad
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Carrie L Kitko
- Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Betty K Hamilton
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Amin M Alousi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mary E Flowers
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Stefanie Sarantopoulos
- Division of Hematological Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Paul Carpenter
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jennifer White
- Leukemia/Bone Marrow Transplant Program of British Columbia, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC
| | - Sally Arai
- Department of Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Najla El Jurdi
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN
| | - George Chen
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Corey Cutler
- Division of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Stephanie Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Joseph Pidala
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Immunotherapy, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baumrin E, Baker LX, Byrne M, Martin PJ, Flowers ME, Onstad L, El Jurdi N, Chen H, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Lee SJ, Tkaczyk ER. Prognostic Value of Cutaneous Disease Severity Estimates on Survival Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease. JAMA Dermatol 2023; 159:393-402. [PMID: 36884224 PMCID: PMC9996455 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.6624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
Importance Prior studies have demonstrated an association between cutaneous chronic graft-vs-host disease (cGVHD) and mortality. Assessment of the prognostic value of different measures of disease severity would assist in risk stratification. Objective To compare the prognostic value of body surface area (BSA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) Skin Score on survival outcomes stratified by erythema and sclerosis subtypes of cGVHD. Design, Setting, and Participants Multicenter prospective cohort study from the Chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease Consortium including 9 medical centers in the US, enrolled from 2007 through 2012 and followed until 2018. Participants were adults and children with a diagnosis of cGVHD requiring systemic immunosuppression and with skin involvement during the study period, who had longitudinal follow-up. Data analysis was performed from April 2019 to April 2022. Exposures Patients underwent continuous BSA estimation and categorical NIH Skin Score grading of cutaneous cGVHD at enrollment and every 3 to 6 months thereafter. Main Outcomes and Measures Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS), compared between BSA and NIH Skin Score longitudinal prognostic models, adjusted for age, race, conditioning intensity, patient sex, and donor sex. Results Of 469 patients with cGVHD, 267 (57%) (105 female [39%]; mean [SD] age, 51 [12] years) had cutaneous cGVHD at enrollment, and 89 (19%) developed skin involvement subsequently. Erythema-type disease had earlier onset and was more responsive to treatment compared with sclerosis-type disease. Most cases (77 of 112 [69%]) of sclerotic disease occurred without prior erythema. Erythema-type cGVHD at first follow-up visit was associated with NRM (hazard ratio, 1.33 per 10% BSA increase; 95% CI, 1.19-1.48; P < .001) and OS (hazard ratio, 1.28 per 10% BSA increase; 95% CI, 1.14-1.44; P < .001), while sclerosis-type cGVHD had no significant association with mortality. The model with erythema BSA collected at baseline and first follow-up visits retained 75% of the total prognostic information (from all covariates including BSA and NIH Skin Score) for NRM and 73% for OS, with no statistical difference between prognostic models (likelihood ratio test χ2, 5.9; P = .05). Conversely, NIH Skin Score collected at the same intervals lost significant prognostic information (likelihood ratio test χ2, 14.7; P < .001). The model incorporating NIH Skin Score instead of erythema BSA accounted for only 38% of the total information for NRM and 58% for OS. Conclusions and Relevance In this prospective cohort study, erythema-type cutaneous cGVHD was associated with increased risk of mortality. Erythema BSA collected at baseline and follow-up predicted survival more accurately than the NIH Skin Score in patients requiring immunosuppression. Accurate assessment of erythema BSA may assist in identifying patients with cutaneous cGVHD at high risk for mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Baumrin
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Laura X. Baker
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Michael Byrne
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Paul J. Martin
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Mary E. Flowers
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Lynn Onstad
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Najla El Jurdi
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Heidi Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Stephanie J. Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Eric R. Tkaczyk
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Nashville, Tennessee
- Department of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nonrelapse mortality among patients diagnosed with chronic GVHD: an updated analysis from the Chronic GVHD Consortium. Blood Adv 2021; 5:4278-4284. [PMID: 34521116 PMCID: PMC8945647 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
NRM increases without apparent plateau in patients with cGVHD. The most common reported causes of death were cGVHD and infection.
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is the leading cause of late morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. To better understand patients at highest risk for nonrelapse mortality (NRM), we analyzed patient-, transplant-, and cGVHD-related variables, risk factors, and causes of nonrelapse deaths in an updated cohort of 937 patients enrolled on 2 prospective, longitudinal observational studies through the Chronic GVHD Consortium. The median follow-up of survivors was 4 years (range, 0.1 months to 12.5 years). Relapse accounted for 25% of the 333 deaths. The cumulative incidence of NRM was 22% at 5 years, and it increased over time at a projected 40% (95% confidence interval, 30%-50%) at 12 years. Centers reported that cGVHD (37.8%) was the most common cause of NRM and was associated with organ failure, infection, or additional causes not otherwise specified. The next most frequent causes without mention of cGVHD were infection (17%) and respiratory failure (10%). In multivariable analysis, an increased risk for NRM was significantly associated with the use of reduced intensity conditioning, higher total bilirubin, National Institutes of Health (NIH) skin score of 2 to 3, NIH lung score of 1 to 3, worse modified Human Activity Profile adjusted activity score, and decreased distance on walk test. To summarize, cGVHD NRM does not plateau but increases over time and is most commonly attributed to GVHD or infection, presumably associated with immunocompromised status. Severe skin and lung cGVHD remain challenging manifestations associated with increased NRM, for which novel therapeutic options that do not predispose patients to infections are needed.
Collapse
|
5
|
Inamoto Y, Martin PJ, Onstad LE, Cheng GS, Williams KM, Pusic I, Ho VT, Arora M, Pidala J, Flowers MED, Gooley TA, Lawler RL, Hansen JA, Lee SJ. Relevance of Plasma Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 for Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther 2021; 27:759.e1-759.e8. [PMID: 34126278 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a highly morbid form of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Several plasma proteins have been identified as biomarkers for BOS after lung transplantation. The relevance of these biomarkers in BOS patients after allogeneic HCT has not been examined. We hypothesized that biomarkers associated with BOS after lung transplantation are also associated with BOS after allogeneic HCT. We tested plasma samples from 33 adult HCT patients who participated in a phase II multicenter study of fluticasone, azithromycin, and montelukast (FAM) treatment for new-onset BOS (NCT01307462), and matched control samples of HCT patients who had non-BOS chronic GVHD (n = 31) and those who never experienced chronic GVHD (n = 29) (NCT00637689 and NCT01902576). Candidate biomarkers included matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), MMP-3, and chitinase-3-like-1 glycoprotein (YKL-40). MMP-9 concentrations were higher in the patients with BOS compared with those with non-BOS chronic GVHD (P = .04) or no chronic GVHD (P < .001). MMP-3 concentrations were higher in patients with BOS (P < .001) or non-BOS chronic GVHD (P < .001) compared with those with no chronic GVHD. YKL-40 concentrations did not differ statistically among the 3 groups. MMP-9 concentrations before starting FAM therapy were higher in patients who experienced treatment failure within 6 months compared with those with treatment success (P = .006), whereas MMP-3 or YKL-40 concentrations did not differ statistically between these 2 groups. Patients with an MMP-9 concentration ≥200,000 pg/mL before starting FAM therapy had worse overall survival compared with those with lower MMP-9 concentrations. Our data suggest that plasma MMP-9 concentration could serve as a relevant biomarker at diagnosis of BOS after allogeneic HCT for prognostication of survival and for prediction of treatment response. Further validation is needed to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihiro Inamoto
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Paul J Martin
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lynn E Onstad
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Guang-Shing Cheng
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kirsten M Williams
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Iskra Pusic
- Division of Medicine and Oncology, Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Vincent T Ho
- Division of Hematological Malignancies, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mukta Arora
- Division of Hematology/Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Joseph Pidala
- Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Mary E D Flowers
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ted A Gooley
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Richard L Lawler
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - John A Hansen
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Stephanie J Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Refined National Institutes of Health response algorithm for chronic graft-versus-host disease in joints and fascia. Blood Adv 2021; 4:40-46. [PMID: 31899796 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Implementation of the 2014 National Institutes of Health (NIH) response algorithm for joint/fascia graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) has identified real-world limits to its application. To refine the 2014 NIH response algorithm, we analyzed multicenter prospective observational data from the Chronic GVHD Consortium. The training cohort included 209 patients and the replication cohort included 191 patients with joint/fascia involvement during their course of chronic GVHD. Linear mixed models with random patient effect were used to evaluate correlations between response categories and clinician- or patient-perceived changes in joint status as an anchor of response. Analysis of the training cohort showed that a 2-point change in total photographic range of motion (P-ROM) score was clinically meaningful. The results also suggested that a change from 0 to 1 on the NIH joint/fascia score should not be considered as worsening and suggested that both the NIH joint/fascia score and total P-ROM score, but not individual P-ROM scores, should be used for response assessment. On the basis of these results, we developed an evidence-based refined algorithm, the utility of which was examined in an independent replication cohort. Using the refined algorithm, ∼40% of responses were reclassified, largely mitigating most divergent responses among individual joints and changes from 0 to 1 on the NIH joint/fascia score. The refined algorithm showed robust point estimates and tighter 95% confidence intervals associated with clinician- or patient-perceived changes, compared with the 2014 NIH algorithm. The refined algorithm provides a superior, evidence-based method for measuring therapeutic response in joint/fascia chronic GVHD.
Collapse
|
7
|
Dickkopf-related protein 3 is a novel biomarker for chronic GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood Adv 2021; 4:2409-2417. [PMID: 32492155 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
To identify plasma biomarkers associated with fibrotic mechanisms of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), we used multiplex mass spectrometry with pooled samples for biomarker discovery in comparing proteomic profiles between patients with newly diagnosed sclerotic chronic GVHD (n = 21), those with newly diagnosed nonsclerotic chronic GVHD (n = 33), and those without chronic GVHD (n = 20). Immunoassay was used to measure protein concentrations of individual discovery samples and 186 independent verification samples. The discovery mass spectrometry analysis identified 2 candidate proteins with at least 1.5-fold difference in sclerotic GVHD: Dickkopf-related protein 3 (DKK3) and interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP). Analysis of individual discovery samples by immunoassay showed that DKK3, a modulator of the Wnt signaling pathway, was a biomarker for both sclerotic and nonsclerotic chronic GVHD. Verification analysis of 186 patients confirmed that elevated plasma DKK3 concentrations were associated with chronic GVHD, regardless of the presence or absence of sclerosis, and that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85 for association of DKK3 concentrations with chronic GVHD. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that chronic GVHD with or without steroid treatment and patient age were independently associated with DKK3 concentrations. Patients with high DKK3 concentrations had a higher nonrelapse mortality than those with low concentrations. The lower IL1RAP concentrations in patients with sclerotic GVHD compared with other conditions in the discovery cohort were not confirmed in the verification cohort. DKK3 is a novel biomarker for chronic GVHD. Further studies are needed to determine the biological functions of DKK3 in the pathogenesis of chronic GVHD.
Collapse
|
8
|
Shaw BE. Graft Versus Host Disease Clinical Trials: Is it Time for Patients Centered Outcomes to Be the Primary Objective? Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2020; 14:22-30. [PMID: 30637541 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-019-0494-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a common complication following hematopoietic cell transplant and is associated with a high symptom burden, reduced functional status, and impaired quality of life (QOL). QOL is best assessed by patient-reported outcomes (PRO). Numerous clinical trials for the prevention and treatment of GVHD are available. This review aims to understand the landscape of PRO inclusion in clinical trials for GVHD over the last decade. RECENT FINDINGS Consensus bodies, including experts in GVHD, PRO, and clinical trials have made recommendations for a standardized approach for the inclusion of PRO in clinical trials including as primary outcomes, however, these have yet to be implemented in a consistent manner in practice. Consistently applying consensus recommendation in chronic GVHD will ensure that PROs are appropriately included in clinical trials. Development of validated measures in acute GVHD and composite outcomes for all GVHD trials are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bronwen E Shaw
- CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research)/Froedtert, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Ave., Suite C5500, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Teh C, Onstad L, Lee SJ. Reliability and Validity of the Modified 7-Day Lee Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Symptom Scale. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019; 26:562-567. [PMID: 31759158 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Revised: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) adversely affects patient quality of life, functional status, and survival after allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The Lee Symptom Scale is a 30-item scale developed to measure the symptoms of cGVHD. Although the original 30-item scale uses a 1-month recall period, we tested the reliability and validity of a 28-item scale (deleting 2 items based on supportive care needs rather than symptoms) with a 7-day recall period, a format that is more appropriate for use in clinical trials. Results show the modified 7-day scale is reliable and valid in the modern era and may be used to assess the symptom burden of cGVHD in clinical trials. Using the distribution method, a 5- to 6-point difference (half a standard deviation) is considered clinically meaningful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Teh
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lynn Onstad
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Stephanie J Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Diaz MA, Zubicaray J, Molina B, Abad L, Castillo A, Sebastian E, Galvez E, Ruiz J, Vicario JL, Ramirez M, Sevilla J, González-Vicent M. Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation in Children With Hematological Malignancies Using αβ + T-Cell Receptor and CD19 + Cell Depleted Grafts: High CD56 dim/CD56 bright NK Cell Ratio Early Following Transplantation Is Associated With Lower Relapse Incidence and Better Outcome. Front Immunol 2019; 10:2504. [PMID: 31736949 PMCID: PMC6831520 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We prospectively analyzed outcomes of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using αβ+ T-cell receptor/CD19+ depleted grafts. Sixty-three transplantations were performed in 60 patients. Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), 27 patients were diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukemia, and in eight other hematological malignancies were diagnosed. Twenty-three were in first complete remission (CR), 20 in second CR, 20 beyond second CR. Four patients developed graft failure. Median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery was 14 (range 9–25) and 10 days (range 7–30), respectively. The probability of non-relapse mortality (NRM) by day +100 after transplantation was 10 ± 4%. With a median follow-up of 28 months, the probability of relapse was 32 ± 6% and disease-free survival was 52 ± 6%. Immune reconstitution was leaded by NK cells. As such, a high CD56dim/CD56bright NK cell ratio early after transplantation was associated with better disease-free survival (DFS) (≥3.5; 77 ± 8% vs. <3.5; 28 ± 5%; p = 0.001) due to lower relapse incidence (≥3.5; 15 ± 7% vs. <3.5; 37 ± 9%; p = 0.04). T-cell reconstitution was delayed and associated with severe infections after transplant. Viral reactivation/disease and presence of venooclusive disease of liver in the non-caucasian population had a significant impact on NRM. αβ+ T-cell receptor/CD19+ cell-depleted haploidentical transplant is associated with good outcomes especially in patients in early phase of disease. A rapid expansion of “mature” natural killer cells early after transplantation resulted on lower probability of relapse, suggesting a graft vs. leukemia effect independent from graft-vs.-host reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel A Diaz
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Infantil Universitario "Niño Jesus", Madrid, Spain
| | - Josune Zubicaray
- Blood Bank and Graft Manipulation Unit, Division of Hematology, Hospital Infantil Universitario "Niño Jesus", Madrid, Spain
| | - Blanca Molina
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Infantil Universitario "Niño Jesus", Madrid, Spain
| | - Lorea Abad
- Oncology/Hematology Laboratory, Hospital Infantil Universitario "Niño Jesus", Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Castillo
- Oncology/Hematology Laboratory, Hospital Infantil Universitario "Niño Jesus", Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Sebastian
- Blood Bank and Graft Manipulation Unit, Division of Hematology, Hospital Infantil Universitario "Niño Jesus", Madrid, Spain
| | - Eva Galvez
- Blood Bank and Graft Manipulation Unit, Division of Hematology, Hospital Infantil Universitario "Niño Jesus", Madrid, Spain
| | - Julia Ruiz
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Infantil Universitario "Niño Jesus", Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Luis Vicario
- Histocompatibility Laboratory, Community Transfusion Center of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel Ramirez
- Oncology/Hematology Laboratory, Hospital Infantil Universitario "Niño Jesus", Madrid, Spain
| | - Julian Sevilla
- Blood Bank and Graft Manipulation Unit, Division of Hematology, Hospital Infantil Universitario "Niño Jesus", Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta González-Vicent
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Infantil Universitario "Niño Jesus", Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Martin PJ, Storer BE, Palmer J, Jagasia MH, Chen GL, Broady R, Arora M, Pidala JA, Hamilton BK, Lee SJ. Organ Changes Associated with Provider-Assessed Responses in Patients with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019; 25:1869-1874. [PMID: 31085305 PMCID: PMC6755054 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Revised: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Assessments of overall improvement and worsening of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) manifestations by the algorithm recommended by National Institutes of Health (NIH) response criteria do not align closely with those reported by providers, particularly when patients have mixed responses with improvement in some manifestations but worsening in others. To elucidate the changes that influence provider assessment of response, we used logistic regression to generate an overall change index based on specific manifestations of chronic GVHD measured at baseline and 6 months later. We hypothesized that this overall change index would correlate strongly with overall improvement as determined by providers. The analysis included 488 patients from 2 prospective observational studies who were randomly assigned in a 3:2 ratio to discovery and replication cohorts. Changes in bilirubin and scores of the lower gastrointestinal tract, mouth, joint/fascia, lung, and skin were correlated with provider-assessed improvement, suggesting that the main NIH response measures capture relevant information. Conversely, changes in the eye, esophagus, and upper gastrointestinal tract did not correlate with provider-assessed response, suggesting that these scales could be modified or dropped from the NIH response assessment. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve in the replication cohort was 0.72, indicating that the scoring algorithm for overall change based on NIH response measures is not well calibrated with provider-assessed response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J Martin
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Barry E Storer
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Madan H Jagasia
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - George L Chen
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Raewyn Broady
- Leukemia/Bone Marrow Transplant Program of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mukta Arora
- Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Joseph A Pidala
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Betty K Hamilton
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Stephanie J Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gandelman JS, Byrne MT, Mistry AM, Polikowsky HG, Diggins KE, Chen H, Lee SJ, Arora M, Cutler C, Flowers M, Pidala J, Irish JM, Jagasia MH. Machine learning reveals chronic graft- versus-host disease phenotypes and stratifies survival after stem cell transplant for hematologic malignancies. Haematologica 2018; 104:189-196. [PMID: 30237265 PMCID: PMC6312024 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.193441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2018] [Accepted: 08/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The application of machine learning in medicine has been productive in multiple fields, but has not previously been applied to analyze the complexity of organ involvement by chronic graft-versus-host disease. Chronic graft-versus-host disease is classified by an overall composite score as mild, moderate or severe, which may overlook clinically relevant patterns in organ involvement. Here we applied a novel computational approach to chronic graft-versus-host disease with the goal of identifying phenotypic groups based on the subcomponents of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria. Computational analysis revealed seven distinct groups of patients with contrasting clinical risks. The high-risk group had an inferior overall survival compared to the low-risk group (hazard ratio 2.24; 95% confidence interval: 1.36-3.68), an effect that was independent of graft-versus-host disease severity as measured by the National Institutes of Health criteria. To test clinical applicability, knowledge was translated into a simplified clinical prognostic decision tree. Groups identified by the decision tree also stratified outcomes and closely matched those from the original analysis. Patients in the high- and intermediate-risk decision-tree groups had significantly shorter overall survival than those in the low-risk group (hazard ratio 2.79; 95% confidence interval: 1.58-4.91 and hazard ratio 1.78; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-3.01, respectively). Machine learning and other computational analyses may better reveal biomarkers and stratify risk than the current approach based on cumulative severity. This approach could now be explored in other disease models with complex clinical phenotypes. External validation must be completed prior to clinical application. Ultimately, this approach has the potential to reveal distinct pathophysiological mechanisms that may underlie clusters. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00637689.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jocelyn S Gandelman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.,Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.,Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Michael T Byrne
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Akshitkumar M Mistry
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Hannah G Polikowsky
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.,Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Kirsten E Diggins
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.,Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Heidi Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Stephanie J Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Mukta Arora
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Corey Cutler
- Stem Cell/Bone Marrow Transplantation Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Mary Flowers
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Joseph Pidala
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jonathan M Irish
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN .,Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.,Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Madan H Jagasia
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN .,Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gandelman JS, Zic J, Dewan AK, Lee SJ, Flowers M, Cutler C, Pidala J, Chen H, Jagasia MH, Tkaczyk ER. The Anatomic Distribution of Skin Involvement in Patients with Incident Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2018; 25:279-286. [PMID: 30219700 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Little is known about the anatomic distribution of cutaneous chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Using data from the cGVHD Consortium Improving Outcomes Assessment Study, we describe the frequency and extent of erythema and superficial and deep sclerosis in 8 anatomic sites in patients with incident disease (ie, new cGVHD diagnosis within 3 months of study entry) receiving systemic therapy. Of 339 patients with incident disease, 182 (54%) had skin involvement. When an extremity was involved, the same type of disease was present contralaterally in 92% of cases, revealing a high level of symmetry. As anticipated, erythema was the most common incident feature; however, sclerotic skin involvement at the time of cGVHD diagnosis was more common than has been suggested by previous studies. Erythema occurred in 155 (85%) and sclerosis in 53 (29%) of the patients with skin involvement (46% and 16%, respectively, of the entire cohort of 339 incident cGVHD cases). Erythema was least common on the lower extremities (n = 71; 39% of patients with skin involvement). Moveable sclerosis was rare on the head, neck, and scalp (n = 4; 2%). Deep sclerosis did not occur in this region, and instead was most likely to occur on the upper extremities (n = 14; 8%) and lower extremities (n = 14; 8%). More than one-half of patients with erythema (n = 107; 58.7%) had diffuse involvement (4 or more of 8 sites involved), compared with less than one-third of those with sclerosis (n = 16; 30.2%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jocelyn S Gandelman
- Department of Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - John Zic
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; Department of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Anna K Dewan
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; Department of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Stephanie J Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Mary Flowers
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Corey Cutler
- Stem Cell/Bone Marrow Transplantation Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joseph Pidala
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Heidi Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Madan H Jagasia
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Eric R Tkaczyk
- Department of Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; Department of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
El-Jawahri A, Pidala J, Khera N, Wood WA, Arora M, Carpenter PA, Palmer J, Flowers ME, Jagasia M, Chen YB, Lee SJ. Impact of Psychological Distress on Quality of Life, Functional Status, and Survival in Patients with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2018; 24:2285-2292. [PMID: 30031937 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Data on psychological distress and its association with clinical outcomes in patients with chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) are lacking. We used data of patients with chronic GVHD (N = 482) from the Chronic GVHD Consortium, a prospective observational multicenter cohort. We examined the relationship between self-reported depression or anxiety symptoms (measured by the Lee Symptom Scale) and patients' quality of life (QOL; measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General [FACT-G] and the Physical Component Scale [PCS] of the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey), physical functioning (measured by the Human Activity Profile), functional status (measured by the 2-minute walk test), and overall survival (OS). Overall, 19.3% of patients (93/481) reported being moderately to extremely bothered by depression, and 22.8% (110/482) reported being moderately to extremely bothered by anxiety, with 14.1% (68/482) of those reporting being bothered by both. In multivariable models adjusted for clinical covariates, patients with self-reported depression had worse QOL (FACT-G: β = -23.09, P < .001; PCS: β = -4.94, P < .001), physical functioning (β = -8.31, P < .001), functional status (β = -37.21, P = .025), and lower OS (hazard ratio, 1.62; P = .020) compared with those with no depression symptoms. Patients who reported anxiety also had lower QOL (FACT-G: β = -19.47, P < .001; PCS: β = -3.91, P < .001), physical functioning (β = -6.69, P < .001), and functional status (β = -32.42, P = .036) but no difference in OS. Patients with chronic GVHD who report depression or anxiety symptoms have significantly compromised QOL and physical functioning. Self-reported depression is associated with lower OS. Patients with chronic GVHD and self-reported depression or anxiety represent a highly vulnerable population at risk for poor clinical outcomes and substantial morbidity from their illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Areej El-Jawahri
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Joseph Pidala
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Nandita Khera
- Department of Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - William A Wood
- Department of Bone Marrow and Stem Cell Transplantation Program, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Mukta Arora
- Department of Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Paul A Carpenter
- Department of Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jeanne Palmer
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Mary E Flowers
- Department of Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Madan Jagasia
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Yi-Bin Chen
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephanie J Lee
- Department of Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Design and Patient Characteristics of the Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Response Measures Validation Study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2018; 24:1727-1732. [PMID: 29476954 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Accepted: 02/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In 2014, the National Institutes of Health sponsored the second Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD). The purpose was to update recommendations about key elements of chronic GVHD research, including definitions for diagnosis, severity scoring, and response measures, based on empirical data published since the first 2005 Consensus Conference. The most significant modifications were to the response assessments, based on studies demonstrating difficulty with the first consensus definitions. The Response Measures Validation Study is a multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients who are starting initial or subsequent treatments for chronic GVHD. The aim of the study is to evaluate the performance of the 2014 response measures and determine whether any other combination of assessments is superior. Clinical data, clinician assessments, patient-reported outcomes, and research samples are collected at enrollment and 3, 6, and 18 months later, and whenever another chronic GVHD systemic treatment is added. The target enrollment of 368 evaluable patients from 12 transplantation centers has been reached. This report describes the rationale, design, and methods of the Chronic GVHD Response Measures Validation Study, and invites other investigators to collaborate with the Consortium to analyze data or specimens.
Collapse
|
16
|
Lee SJ, Nguyen TD, Onstad L, Bar M, Krakow EF, Salit RB, Carpenter PA, Rodrigues M, Hall AM, Storer BE, Martin PJ, Flowers ME. Success of Immunosuppressive Treatments in Patients with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2017; 24:555-562. [PMID: 29133250 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.10.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Moderate to severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is treated with potent immunosuppressive therapy (IST) to modulate the allo-immune response, control symptoms, and prevent further organ damage. We sought to understand the types of treatments used in clinical practice and the likelihood of successful treatment associated with each. A chart review was performed for 250 adult patients at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center enrolled in a prospective observational study. After a median follow-up of 5.6 years for survivors, approximately one-third were still on IST (of whom half were on fourth or greater line of therapy), one-third were alive and off IST, and one-third had relapsed or died. Approximately half of survivors stopped all IST at least once, although half of these restarted IST after a median of 3.4 months (interquartile range, 2.3 to 8.0) off therapy. Successful discontinuation of IST for at least 9 months was associated with myeloablative conditioning (P = .04), more years since transplant (P = .009), and lack of oral (P < .001) and skin (P = .049) involvement compared with those who had to restart IST. We conclude that patients with chronic GVHD usually receive multiple lines and years of IST, with only a third off IST, alive, and free of malignancy at 5 years after chronic GVHD diagnosis. Patients stopping IST should be cautioned to self-monitor and continue close medical follow-up, especially for 3 to 6 months after stopping IST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie J Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Tam D Nguyen
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Lynn Onstad
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Merav Bar
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Elizabeth F Krakow
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rachel B Salit
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Paul A Carpenter
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Morgani Rodrigues
- Center for Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - A Marcie Hall
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Barry E Storer
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Paul J Martin
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Mary E Flowers
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Association of Socioeconomic Status with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Outcomes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2017; 24:393-399. [PMID: 29032275 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Chronic graft-versus host disease (GVHD) is a chronic and disabling complication after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). It is important to understand the association of socioeconomic status (SES) with health outcomes in patients with chronic GVHD because of the impaired physical health and dependence on intensive and prolonged health care utilization needs in these patients. We evaluated the association of SES with survival and quality of life (QOL) in a cohort of 421 patients with chronic GVHD enrolled on the Chronic GVHD Consortium Improving Outcomes Assessment study. Income, education, marital status, and work status were analyzed to determine the associations with patient-reported outcomes at the time of enrollment, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and overall mortality. Higher income (P = .004), ability to work (P < .001), and having a partner (P = .021) were associated with better mean Lee chronic GVHD symptom scores. Higher income (P = .048), educational level (P = .044), and ability to work (P < .001) also were significantly associated with better QOL and improved activity. In multivariable models, higher income and ability to return to work were both significantly associated with better chronic GVHD Lee symptom scores, but income was not associated with activity level, QOL, or physical/mental functioning. The inability to return to work (hazard ratio, 1.82; P = .019) was associated with worse overall mortality, whereas none of the SES indicators were associated with NRM. Income, race, and education did not have statistically significant associations with survival. In summary, we did not observe an association between SES variables and survival or NRM in patients with chronic GVHD, although we found some association with patient-reported outcomes, such as symptom burden. Higher income status was associated with less severe chronic GVHD symptoms. More research is needed to understand the psychosocial, biological, and environmental factors that mediate this association of SES with major HCT outcomes.
Collapse
|
18
|
An endpoint associated with clinical benefit after initial treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood 2017; 130:360-367. [PMID: 28495794 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-03-775767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
No gold standard has been established as a primary endpoint in trials of initial treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and evidence showing the association of any proposed primary endpoint with clinical benefit has not been conclusively demonstrated. To address this gap, we analyzed outcomes in a cohort of 328 patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, observational study within 3 months after diagnosis of chronic GVHD. Complete and partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were defined according to the 2014 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease. Success was defined as complete or partial response with no secondary systemic treatment or recurrent malignancy at 1 year after enrollment. Success was observed in fewer than 20% of the patients. The burden of disease manifestations at 1 year was lower for patients in this category than for those with stable or progressive disease. Systemic treatment ended earlier, and subsequent mortality was lower among patients with complete or partial response than among those with stable or progressive disease and those who had received secondary systemic treatment. We conclude that survival with a complete or partial response and no previous secondary systemic treatment or recurrent malignancy at 1 year after initial systemic therapy is associated with clinical benefit, a critical characteristic for consideration as a primary endpoint in a pivotal clinical trial. This prospective observational study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00637689.
Collapse
|
19
|
Facilitating Clinical Studies in Rare Diseases. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2017; 1031:125-140. [PMID: 29214568 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, there have been many scientific advances and new collaborations for rare diseases research and, ultimately, the health of patients living with rare diseases. However, for too many rare diseases, there still is no effective treatment, and our understanding of the incidence, prevalence, and underlying etiology is incomplete. To facilitate the studies needed to answer the many open questions there is a great need for the active involvement of all stakeholders, most importantly of patient groups. Also, the creation of streamlined infrastructure for performing multi-site clinical studies is critical, as is the engagement of multi-disciplinary teams with shared focus on a group of diseases. Another essential component of such efforts is to collect standardized data so that downstream meta-analyses and data sharing can be facilitated. To ensure high-quality protocols and datasets, a central data management and coordinating center is important. Since there are more than 6000 rare diseases, instead of focusing on single rare disease, it is more impactful to create platforms and methods that can support a group of rare diseases.
Collapse
|
20
|
Krupski C, Jagasia M. Quality of Life in the Chronic GVHD Consortium Cohort: Lessons Learned and the Long Road Ahead. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2016; 10:183-91. [PMID: 26303672 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-015-0265-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes are receiving increased attention as the search for successful treatment agents of chronic graft versus host disease continues. There is currently an ongoing multicenter, prospective cohort study lead by the Chronic GVHD Consortium of patients with chronic graft versus host disease. This paper summarizes published findings to date reporting factors impacting quality of life, symptom burden, and physical functioning in this cohort. Middle age, versus younger or older age, is associated with worse quality of life, despite lower symptom burden. The presence of chronic graft versus host disease at study enrollment was associated with lower quality of life, and improvement in severity does not always change quality of life. Other factors negatively impacting quality of life include the presence of overlap syndrome, specific gastrointestinal and joint and fascia manifestations, and poorer functional status and exercise tolerance. Collecting valid and concise quality of life data is essential in developing treatment strategies for chronic graft versus host disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christa Krupski
- Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 397 PRB, 2220 Pierce Avenue, Nashville, TN, 37232-6310, USA,
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yu J, Storer BE, Kushekhar K, Abu Zaid M, Zhang Q, Gafken PR, Ogata Y, Martin PJ, Flowers ME, Hansen JA, Arora M, Cutler C, Jagasia M, Pidala J, Hamilton BK, Chen GL, Pusic I, Lee SJ, Paczesny S. Biomarker Panel for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:2583-90. [PMID: 27217465 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.65.9615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify diagnostic and prognostic markers of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), the major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Using a quantitative proteomics approach, we compared pooled plasma samples obtained at matched time points after HCT (median, 103 days) from 35 patients with cGVHD and 18 without cGVHD (data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD002762). Of 105 proteins showing at least a 1.25-fold difference in expression, 22 were selected on the basis of involvement in relevant pathways and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay availability. Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9 (CXCL9) and suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) also were measured on the basis of previously determined associations with GVHD. Concentrations of the four lead biomarkers were measured at or after diagnosis in plasma from two independent verification cohorts (n = 391) to determine their association with cGVHD. Their prognostic ability when measured at approximately day +100 after HCT was evaluated in plasma of a second verification cohort (n = 172). RESULTS Of 24 proteins measured in the first verification cohort, nine proteins were associated with cGVHD, and only four (ST2, CXCL9, matrix metalloproteinase 3, and osteopontin) were necessary to compose a four-biomarker panel with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.89 and significant correlation with cGVHD diagnosis, cGVHD severity, and nonrelapse mortality. In a second verification cohort, this panel distinguished patients with cGVHD (AUC, 0.75), and finally, the panel measured at day +100 could predict cGVHD occurring within the next 3 months with an AUC of 0.67 and 0.79 without and with known clinical risk factors, respectively. CONCLUSION We conclude that the biomarker panel measured at diagnosis or day +100 after HCT may allow patient stratification according to risk of cGVHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Yu
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Barry E Storer
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Kushi Kushekhar
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Mohammad Abu Zaid
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Qing Zhang
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Philip R Gafken
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Yuko Ogata
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Paul J Martin
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Mary E Flowers
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - John A Hansen
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Mukta Arora
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Corey Cutler
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Madan Jagasia
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Joseph Pidala
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Betty K Hamilton
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - George L Chen
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Iskra Pusic
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Stephanie J Lee
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Sophie Paczesny
- Jeffrey Yu, Kushi Kushekhar, Mohammad Abu Zaid, and Sophie Paczesny, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Barry E. Storer, Paul J. Martin, Mary E. Flowers, John A. Hansen, Stephanie J. Lee, Qing Zhang, Philip R. Gafken, and Yuko Ogata, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Barry E. Storer, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Mukta Arora, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Madan Jagasia, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Joseph Pidala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Betty K. Hamilton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; George L. Chen, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; and Iskra Pusic, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2016; 11:66. [PMID: 27194034 PMCID: PMC4870759 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-016-0445-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2016] [Accepted: 05/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among the unique features of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) Program is the requirement for each Consortium to include patient advocacy groups (PAGs) as research partners. This development has transformed the work of the RDCRN and is a model for collaborative research. This article outlines the roles patients and PAGs play in the RDCRN and reports on the PAGs' impact on the Network's success. METHODS Principal Investigators from the 17 RDCRN Consortia and 28 representatives from 76 PAGs affiliated with these Consortia were contacted by email to provide feedback via an online RDCRN survey. Impact was measured in the key areas of 1) Research logistics; 2) Outreach and communication; and 3) Funding and in-kind support. Rating choices were: 1-very negative, 2-somewhat negative, 3-no impact, 4-somewhat positive, and 5-very positive. RESULTS Twenty-seven of the PAGs (96 %) disseminate information about the RDCRN within the patient community. The Consortium Principal Investigators also reported high levels of PAG involvement. Sixteen (94 %) Consortium Principal Investigators and 25 PAGs (89 %) reported PAGs participation in protocol review, study design, Consortium conference calls, attending Consortium meetings, or helping with patient recruitment. CONCLUSIONS PAGs are actively involved in shaping Consortia's research agendas, help ensure the feasibility and success of research protocols by assisting with study design and patient recruitment, and support training programs. This extensive PAG-Investigator partnership in the RDCRN has had a strongly positive impact on the success of the Network.
Collapse
|
23
|
Heterogeneity of chronic graft-versus-host disease biomarkers: association with CXCL10 and CXCR3+ NK cells. Blood 2016; 127:3082-91. [PMID: 27020088 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-09-668251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2015] [Accepted: 03/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains one of the most significant long-term complications after allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation. Diagnostic biomarkers for cGVHD are needed for early diagnosis and may guide identification of prognostic markers. No cGVHD biomarker has yet been validated for use in clinical practice. We evaluated both previously known markers and performed discovery-based analysis for cGVHD biomarkers in a 2 independent test sets (total of 36 cases ≤1 month from diagnosis and 31 time-matched controls with no cGVHD). On the basis of these results, 11 markers were selected and evaluated in 2 independent replication cohorts (total of 134 cGVHD cases and 154 controls). cGVHD cases and controls were evaluated for several clinical covariates, and their impact on biomarkers was identified by univariate analysis. The 2 replications sets were relatively disparate in the biomarkers they replicated. Only sBAFF and, most consistently, CXCL10 were identified as significant in both replication sets. Other markers identified as significant in only 1 replication set included intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), anti-LG3, aminopeptidase N, CXCL9, endothelin-1, and gelsolin. Multivariate analysis found that all covariates evaluated affected interpretation of the biomarkers. CXCL10 had an increased significance in combination with anti-LG3 and CXCL9, or inversely with CXCR3(+)CD56(bright) natural killer (NK) cells. There was significant heterogeneity of cGVHD biomarkers in a large comprehensive evaluation of cGVHD biomarkers impacted by several covariates. Only CXCL10 strongly correlated in both replication sets. Future analyses for plasma cGVHD biomarkers will need to be performed on very large patient groups with consideration of multiple covariates.
Collapse
|
24
|
Yuan A, Chai X, Martins F, Arai S, Arora M, Correa ME, Pidala J, Cutler CS, Lee SJ, Treister NS. Oral chronic GVHD outcomes and resource utilization: a subanalysis from the chronic GVHD consortium. Oral Dis 2015; 22:235-40. [PMID: 26708609 DOI: 10.1111/odi.12429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2015] [Revised: 11/25/2015] [Accepted: 12/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the extent to which oral chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) consensus assessments are predictive of management across institutions with and without oral medicine (OM) centers, and whether ancillary care guidelines are followed within clinical practice. METHODS Longitudinal oral cGVHD data were abstracted from the cGVHD Consortium, and additional mouth-specific management data were analyzed across five transplant centers. RESULTS Seventy-nine patients with 656 visits were observed for a median of 7.1 months with one visit per follow-up month. Ancillary therapies for oral cGVHD were prescribed for 67% of patients for a median of 0.46 months (per follow-up month) at OM centers and 0.78 months at non-OM centers. Patients treated with ancillary therapy were more likely to have an National Institutes of Health (NIH) mouth score of ≥1 (P < 0.001, odds ratio: 5.1) and mouth pain (P = 0.01, odds ratio: 2.6). The odds ratios of receiving ancillary therapy from OM experts were higher than transplant physicians (53%; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Oral cGVHD consensus assessments corresponding with ancillary therapy use were mouth pain and NIH mouth score, with higher odds ratios of receiving therapy from OM experts. Ancillary care guidelines for oral cGVHD are reflected in academic clinical practice with respect to utilization of recommended prescriptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Yuan
- Division of Oral Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Oral Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - X Chai
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - F Martins
- Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Diagnosis, University of São Paulo School of Dentistry, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - S Arai
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - M Arora
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M E Correa
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.,Oral Medicine Ambulatory, Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Hematology and Blood Transfusion Center, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - J Pidala
- Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - C S Cutler
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - S J Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - N S Treister
- Division of Oral Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Oral Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Predictors of survival, nonrelapse mortality, and failure-free survival in patients treated for chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood 2015; 127:160-6. [PMID: 26527676 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-662874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2015] [Accepted: 10/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a pleotropic syndrome that lacks validated methods of measuring response in clinical trials, although several end points have been proposed. To investigate the prognostic significance of these proposed end points, such as the 2005 National Institutes of Health (NIH) response measures, 2014 NIH response measures, clinician-reported response, and patient-reported response, we tested their ability to predict subsequent overall survival (OS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and failure-free survival (FFS). Patients (n = 575) were enrolled on a prospective chronic GVHD observational trial. At 6 months, clinician-reported response (P = .004) and 2014 NIH-calculated response (P = .001) correlated with subsequent FFS, and clinician-reported response predicted OS (P = .007). Multivariate models were used to identify changes in organ involvement, laboratory values, and patient-reported outcomes that were associated with long-term outcomes. At 6 months, a change in the 2005 NIH 0 to 3 clinician-reported skin score and 0 to 10 patient-reported itching score predicted subsequent FFS. Change in the Lee skin symptom score and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant score predicted subsequent OS. Change in the Lee skin symptom score predicted subsequent NRM. This study provides evidence that clinician-reported response and patient-reported outcomes are predictive of long-term survival. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00637689.
Collapse
|
26
|
DePalo J, Chai X, Lee SJ, Cutler CS, Treister N. Assessing the relationship between oral chronic graft-versus-host disease and global measures of quality of life. Oral Oncol 2015; 51:944-9. [PMID: 26277616 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2015] [Revised: 07/26/2015] [Accepted: 07/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) is a frequent complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and affects multiple organ systems, with the oral cavity being one of the most frequently affected sites. Patients with cGVHD experience reduced quality of life (QOL), yet the specific impact of oral cGVHD on QOL is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to characterize the impact of oral cGVHD on global measures of QOL. MATERIALS AND METHODS QOL data were collected using the FACT-BMT and SF-36 instruments for 569 patients enrolled in the Chronic GVHD Consortium, with a total of 1915 follow-up visits. At study enrollment, patients were categorized as isolated oral cGVHD (n=22), oral and concomitant extra-oral cGVHD (n=420), and only extra-oral cGVHD (n=127). Utilizing all longitudinal data, QOL scores were compared using a multivariable linear model controlling for demographic, transplant, and cGVHD characteristics. RESULTS Patients with isolated oral cGVHD reported better physical well-being (P=0.009), BMT well-being (P=0.01), and decreased bodily pain (P=0.01) compared to patients with oral and concomitant extra-oral cGVHD, but the differences in scores did not reach the defined threshold for clinical significance (6 points for FACT-BMT domains and 5 points for SF-36 domains). CONCLUSIONS Global QOL scores are similar in patients with isolated oral cGVHD and patients with oral and concomitant extra-oral cGVHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph DePalo
- Harvard School of Dental Medicine, 188 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Xiaoyu Chai
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Stephanie J Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Corey S Cutler
- Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Nathaniel Treister
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Oral Medicine and Dentistry, 1620 Tremont Street, Suite BC-3-028, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sun YC, Chai X, Inamoto Y, Pidala J, Martin PJ, Flowers MED, Shen TT, Lee SJ, Jagasia M. Impact of Ocular Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease on Quality of Life. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2015; 21:1687-91. [PMID: 26033283 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2015] [Accepted: 05/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Ocular involvement can be quite symptomatic in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The prevalence of and risk factors for ocular GVHD and its impact on quality of life (QOL) in patients with chronic GVHD were studied in a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal, observational study. This study enrolled 342 patients with 1483 follow-up visits after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. All patients in this analysis were diagnosed with chronic GVHD requiring systemic treatment and enrolled within 3 months of chronic GVHD diagnosis. The symptom burden of ocular GVHD was based on the degree of dry eye symptoms, frequency of artificial tear usage, and impact on activities of daily living. Patients' QOL was measured by self-administered questionnaires. Variables associated with ocular GVHD at enrollment and subsequent new-onset ocular GVHD and the associations with QOL were studied. Of the 284 chronic GVHD patients, 116 (41%) had ocular GVHD within 3 months of chronic GVHD diagnosis ("early ocular GVHD"). Late ocular GVHD (new onset > 3 months after chronic GVHD diagnosis) occurred in 64 patients. Overall cumulative incidence at 2 years was 57%. Female gender (P = .005), higher acute GVHD grade (P = .04), and higher prednisone dose at study entry (P = .04) were associated with early ocular GVHD. For patients who did not have ocular GVHD within 3 months of chronic GVHD diagnosis, presence of prior grades I to IV acute GVHD (HR 1.78, P = .04) was associated with shorter time to late ocular GVHD, whereas female donor-male recipient (HR .53, P = .05) was associated with longer time to late ocular GVHD onset. Using all visit data, patients with ocular GVHD had worse QOL, as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Bone Marrow Transplantation (P = .002), and greater chronic GVHD symptom burden, as measured by the Lee symptom overall score excluding the eye component (P < .001), compared with patients without ocular GVHD. In conclusion, this large, multicenter, prospective study shows that ocular GVHD affects 57% of patients within 2 years of chronic GVHD diagnosis. Women, patients on higher doses of prednisone at study entry, and those with a history of acute GVHD were at higher risk for ocular GVHD. Strong evidence suggests that ocular GVHD is associated with worse overall health-related QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chen Sun
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Xiaoyu Chai
- Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Yoshihiro Inamoto
- Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Division of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Joseph Pidala
- Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Paul J Martin
- Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Mary E D Flowers
- Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Tueng T Shen
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Stephanie J Lee
- Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Madan Jagasia
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Palmer J, Chai X, Martin PJ, Weisdorf D, Inamoto Y, Pidala J, Jagasia M, Pavletic S, Cutler C, Vogelsang G, Arai S, Flowers MED, Lee SJ. Failure-free survival in a prospective cohort of patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Haematologica 2015; 100:690-5. [PMID: 25715403 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2014.117283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2014] [Accepted: 02/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Failure-free survival, defined as the absence of relapse, non-relapse mortality or addition of another systemic therapy, has been proposed as a potential endpoint for clinical trials, but its use has only been reported for single-center studies. We measured failure-free survival in a prospective observational cohort of patients (n=575) with both newly diagnosed and existing chronic graft-versus-host disease from nine centers. Failure was observed in 389 (68%) patients during the observation period. The median follow up of all patients was 30.9 months, and the median failure-free survival was 9.8 months (63% at 6 months, 45% at 1 year, and 29% at 2 years). Of the variables measured at enrollment, ten were associated with shorter failure-free survival: higher National Institutes of Health 0-3 skin score, higher National Institutes of Health 0-3 gastrointestinal score, worse range of motion summary score, lower forced vital capacity (%), bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, worse quality of life, moderate to severe hepatic dysfunction, absence of treatment for gastric acid, female donor for male recipient, and prior grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease. Addition of a new systemic treatment, the major cause of failure, was associated with an increased risk of subsequent non-relapse mortality (hazard ratio=2.06, 95% confidence interval: 1.29-3.32; P<0.003) and decreased survival (hazard ratio=1.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-2.18; P<0.03). These results show that fewer than half of patients on systemic treatment will be failure-free survivors at 1 year, and fewer than a third will reach 2 years without experiencing failure. Better treatments are needed for chronic graft-versus-host disease. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00637689.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne Palmer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Xiaoyu Chai
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Paul J Martin
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Daniel Weisdorf
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Yoshihiro Inamoto
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA Division of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Joseph Pidala
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Madan Jagasia
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Steven Pavletic
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Corey Cutler
- Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sally Arai
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University Medical Center, CA, USA
| | - Mary E D Flowers
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Stephanie J Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
El-Jawahri A, Pidala J, Inamoto Y, Chai X, Khera N, Wood WA, Cutler C, Arora M, Carpenter PA, Palmer J, Flowers M, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Jaglowski S, Jagasia M, Lee SJ, Chen YB. Impact of age on quality of life, functional status, and survival in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014; 20:1341-8. [PMID: 24813171 PMCID: PMC4127362 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2014] [Accepted: 05/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Although older patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) may experience higher morbidity, the impact of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) on quality of life (QOL) and survival outcomes for older compared with younger patients is currently unknown. We utilized data of patients with moderate or severe chronic GVHD (N = 522, 1661 follow-up visits, a total of 2183 visits) from the Chronic GVHD Consortium, a prospective observational multicenter cohort. We examined the relationship between age group (adolescent and young adult, "AYA," 18 to 40 years; "middle-aged," 41 to 59 years; and "older," ≥ 60 years) and QOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplantation [FACT-BMT]), physical functioning (Human Activity Profile [HAP]), functional status (2-minute walk test [2MWT]), nonrelapse mortality, and overall survival. Because of multiple testing, P values < .01 were considered significant. This study included 115 (22%) AYA, 279 (53%) middle-aged, and 128 (25%) older patients with moderate (58%) or severe (42%) chronic GVHD. Despite more physical limitations in older patients as measured by worse functional status (shorter 2MWT [P < .001] and lower HAP scores [P < .001]) relative to AYA and middle-aged patients, older patients reported better QOL (FACT-BMT, P = .004) compared with middle-aged patients and similar to AYA patients (P = .99). Nonrelapse mortality and overall survival were similar between the age groups. Therefore, despite higher physical and functional limitations, older patients who are selected to undergo HSCT and survive long enough to develop moderate or severe chronic GVHD have preserved QOL and similar overall survival and nonrelapse mortality when compared with younger patients. Therefore, we did not find evidence that older age is associated with worse outcomes in patients with moderate or severe chronic GVHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Areej El-Jawahri
- Division of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Joseph Pidala
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Yoshi Inamoto
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Xiaoyu Chai
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nandita Khera
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - William A Wood
- Linenberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Corey Cutler
- Hematologic Malignancies, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mukta Arora
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Paul A Carpenter
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jeanne Palmer
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Mary Flowers
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Daniel Weisdorf
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Steven Pavletic
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Center for Cancer Research, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Samantha Jaglowski
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Madan Jagasia
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Stephanie J Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Yi-Bin Chen
- Division of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
The Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network's organization and approach to observational research and health outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med 2014; 29 Suppl 3:S739-44. [PMID: 25029976 PMCID: PMC4124127 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-2894-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Established in 2003 by the Office of Rare Diseases Research (ORDR), in collaboration with several National Institutes of Health (NIH) Institutes/Centers, the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) consists of multiple clinical consortia conducting research in more than 200 rare diseases. The RDCRN supports longitudinal or natural history, pilot, Phase I, II, and III, case-control, cross-sectional, chart review, physician survey, bio-repository, and RDCRN Contact Registry (CR) studies. To date, there have been 24,684 participants enrolled on 120 studies from 446 sites worldwide. An additional 11,533 individuals participate in the CR. Through a central data management and coordinating center (DMCC), the RDCRN's platform for the conduct of observational research encompasses electronic case report forms, federated databases, and an online CR for epidemiological and survey research. An ORDR-governed data repository (through dbGaP, a database for genotype and phenotype information from the National Library of Medicine) has been created. DMCC coordinates with ORDR to register and upload study data to dbGaP for data sharing with the scientific community. The platform provided by the RDCRN DMCC has supported 128 studies, six of which were successfully conducted through the online CR, with 2,352 individuals accrued and a median enrollment time of just 2 months. The RDCRN has built a powerful suite of web-based tools that provide for integration of federated and online database support that can accommodate a large number of rare diseases on a global scale. RDCRN studies have made important advances in the diagnosis and treatment of rare diseases.
Collapse
|
31
|
Inamoto Y, Martin PJ, Storer BE, Palmer J, Weisdorf DJ, Pidala J, Flowers MED, Arora M, Jagasia M, Arai S, Chai X, Pavletic SZ, Vogelsang GB, Lee SJ. Association of severity of organ involvement with mortality and recurrent malignancy in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Haematologica 2014; 99:1618-23. [PMID: 24997150 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2014.109611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The National Institutes of Health global score for chronic graft-versus-host disease was devised by experts but was not based on empirical data. We hypothesized that analysis of prospectively collected data would enable derivation of a more accurate model for estimating mortality risk. We analyzed 574 adult patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease enrolled in a multicenter, observational study, using multivariate time-varying analysis accounting for serial changes in severity of involvement of eight individual organ sites over time. In the training set, severity of skin, mouth, gastrointestinal tract, liver and lung involvement were independently associated with the risk of non-relapse mortality. Weighted mortality points were assigned to individual organs based on the hazard ratios and were summed. The population was divided into three risk groups based on the total mortality points. The three new risk groups were validated in an independent validation set, but did not show better discriminative performance than the National Institutes of Health global score. As compared to a moderate or mild global score, a severe global score was associated with increased risks of non-relapse and overall mortality across time but not with a decreased risk of recurrent malignancy. The National Institutes of Health global score predicts patients' mortality risk throughout the course of their chronic graft-versus-host disease. Further research is required in order to improve outcomes in patients with severe chronic graft-versus-host disease, since their risk of mortality remains elevated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihiro Inamoto
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Paul J Martin
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Barry E Storer
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jeanne Palmer
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Daniel J Weisdorf
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Joseph Pidala
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Mary E D Flowers
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mukta Arora
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Madan Jagasia
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sally Arai
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Xiaoyu Chai
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Stephanie J Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Inamoto Y, Pidala J, Chai X, Kurland BF, Weisdorf D, Flowers MED, Palmer J, Arai S, Jacobsohn D, Cutler C, Jagasia M, Goldberg JD, Martin PJ, Pavletic SZ, Vogelsang GB, Lee SJ, Carpenter PA. Assessment of joint and fascia manifestations in chronic graft-versus-host disease. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014; 66:1044-52. [PMID: 24757155 DOI: 10.1002/art.38293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2013] [Accepted: 11/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the usefulness of various scales for evaluating joint and fascia manifestations in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, and to compare the scales in terms of simplicity of use and ability to yield reliable and clinically meaningful results. METHODS In a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal, observational cohort of patients with chronic GVHD (n = 567), we evaluated 3 scales proposed for assessing joint status: the National Institutes of Health (NIH) joint/fascia scale, the Hopkins fascia scale, and the Photographic Range of Motion (P-ROM) scale. Ten other scales were also tested for assessment of symptoms, quality of life, and physical functions. RESULTS Joint and fascia manifestations were present at study enrollment in 164 (29%) of the patients. Limited range of motion was most frequent at the wrists or fingers. Among the 3 joint assessment scales, changes in the NIH scale correlated with both clinician- and patient-perceived improvement of joint and fascia manifestations, with higher sensitivity than the Hopkins fascia scale. Changes in all 3 scales correlated with clinician- and patient-perceived worsening, but the P-ROM scale was the most sensitive in this regard. Onset of joint and fascia manifestations was not associated with subsequent mortality. CONCLUSION Joint and fascia manifestations are common in patients with chronic GVHD and should be assessed carefully in these patients. Our results support the use of the NIH joint/fascia scale and P-ROM scale to assess joint and fascia manifestations. The NIH scale better captures improvement, while the P-ROM scale better captures worsening. The utility of these scales could also be tested in the rheumatic diseases.
Collapse
|
33
|
Goldberg JD, Giralt S. Assessing response of therapy for acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Expert Rev Hematol 2014; 6:103-7. [DOI: 10.1586/ehm.12.65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
34
|
Pidala J, Chai X, Martin P, Inamoto Y, Cutler C, Palmer J, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Arora M, Jagasia M, Jacobsohn D, Lee SJ. Hand grip strength and 2-minute walk test in chronic graft-versus-host disease assessment: analysis from the Chronic GVHD Consortium. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2013; 19:967-72. [PMID: 23542686 PMCID: PMC3966477 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2013] [Accepted: 03/25/2013] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Hand grip strength (HGS) and the 2-minute walk test (2MWT) have been proposed as elements of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) assessment in clinical trials. Using all available data (n = 584 enrollment visits, 1689 follow-up visits, total of 2273 visits) from a prospective observational cohort study, we explored the relationship between HGS and 2MWT and patient-reported measures (Lee symptom scale, MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36], and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy [FACT]-Bone Marrow Transplantation quality of life instruments and Human Activity Profile [HAP]), chronic GVHD global severity (National Institutes of Health global score, clinician global score, and patient-reported global score), calculated and clinician-reported chronic GVHD response, and mortality (overall survival, nonrelapse mortality, and failure-free survival) in multivariable analyses adjusted for significant covariates. 2MWT was significantly associated with intuitive domains of the Lee Symptom Scale (overall, skin, lung, energy), SF-36 domain and summary scores, FACT summary and domain scores, and HAP scores (all P < .001). Fewer associations were detected with the HGS. The 2MWT and HGS both had significant association with global chronic GVHD severity. In multivariable analysis, 2MWT was significantly associated with overall survival, nonrelapse mortality, and failure-free survival, whereas no association was found for HGS. 2MWT and HGS were not sensitive to National Institutes of Health or clinician-reported response. Based on independent association with mortality, these data support the importance of the 2MWT for identification of high-risk chronic GVHD patients. However, change in 2MWT is not sensitive to chronic GVHD response, limiting its usefulness in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Pidala
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Comorbidity burden in patients with chronic GVHD. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48:1429-36. [PMID: 23665819 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2013.70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2013] [Revised: 04/02/2013] [Accepted: 04/07/2013] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) is associated with mortality, disability and impaired quality of life. Understanding the role of comorbidity in patients with cGVHD is important both for prognostication and potentially for tailoring treatments based on mortality risks. In a prospective cohort study of patients with cGVHD (n=239), we examined the performance of two comorbidity scales, the Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) and the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI). Both scales detected a higher number of comorbidities at cGVHD cohort enrollment than pre-hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) (P<0.001). Higher HCT-CI scores at the time of cGVHD cohort enrollment were associated with higher non-relapse mortality (HR: 1.21:1.04-1.42, P=0.01). For overall mortality, we detected an interaction with platelet count. Higher HCT-CI scores at enrollment were associated with an increased risk of overall mortality when the platelet count was ≤ 100,000/μL (HR: 2.01:1.20-3.35, P=0.01), but not when it was >100,000/μL (HR: 1.05:0.90-1.22, P=0.53). Comorbidity scoring may help better to predict survival outcomes in patients with cGVHD. Further studies to understand vulnerability unrelated to cGVHD activity in this patient population are needed.
Collapse
|
36
|
Pidala J, Chai X, Kurland BF, Inamoto Y, Flowers MED, Palmer J, Khera N, Jagasia M, Cutler C, Arora M, Vogelsang G, Lee SJ. Analysis of gastrointestinal and hepatic chronic graft-versus-host [corrected] disease manifestations on major outcomes: a chronic graft-versus-host [corrected] disease consortium study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2013; 19:784-91. [PMID: 23395601 PMCID: PMC3896215 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2012] [Accepted: 02/01/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Although data support adverse prognosis of overlap subtype of chronic grant-versus-host disease (GVHD), the importance of site of gastrointestinal (GI) and type of hepatic involvement is not known. Using data from the Chronic GVHD Consortium observational cohort study (N = 567, total of 2115 visits), we examined whether the site of GI (esophageal, upper GI, or lower GI) and type of hepatic (bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase) involvement are associated with overall survival (OS) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM), symptoms, quality of life (QOL) and functional status measures. In multivariate analysis utilizing data from enrollment visits only, lower GI involvement (HR, 1.67; P = .05) and elevated bilirubin (HR, 2.46; P = .001) were associated with OS; both were also associated with NRM. In multivariable analysis using all visits (time-dependent covariates), GI score greater than zero (HR, 1.69; P = .02) and elevated bilirubin (HR, 3.73; P < .001) were associated with OS; results were similar for NRM. Any esophageal involvement and GI score greater than zero were associated with both symptoms and QOL, whereas elevated bilirubin was associated with QOL. We found no consistent evidence that upper GI involvement, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, or NIH liver score add prognostic value for survival, overall symptom burden, or QOL. These data support important differences in patient-reported outcomes according to GI and hepatic involvement among chronic GVHD-affected patients and identify those with elevated bilirubin or higher GI score at any time, or lower GI involvement at cohort enrollment, as patients at greater risk for mortality under current treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Pidala
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Treister N, Chai X, Kurland B, Pavletic S, Weisdorf D, Pidala J, Palmer J, Martin P, Inamoto Y, Arora M, Flowers M, Jacobsohn D, Jagasia M, Arai S, Lee SJ, Cutler C. Measurement of oral chronic GVHD: results from the Chronic GVHD Consortium. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48:1123-8. [PMID: 23353804 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2012] [Revised: 12/06/2012] [Accepted: 12/20/2012] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Oral chronic GVHD (cGVHD) is a serious complication of alloSCT. Scales and instruments to measure oral cGVHD activity and severity have not been prospectively validated. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of oral cGVHD and determine the measures most sensitive to change. Patients enrolled in the cGVHD Consortium with oral involvement were included. Clinicians scored oral changes according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria, and patients completed symptom and quality-of-life measures at each visit. Both rated change on an eight-point scale. Of the 458 participants, 72% (n=331) had objective oral involvement at enrollment. Lichenoid change was the most common feature (n=293; 89%). At visits where oral change could be assessed, 50% of clinicians and 56% of patients reported improvement, with worsening reported in 4-5% for both the groups (weighted kappa=0.41). Multivariable regression modeling suggested that the measurement changes most predictive of perceived change by clinicians and patients were erythema and lichenoid, NIH severity and symptom scores. Oral cGVHD is common and associated with a range of signs and symptoms. Measurement of erythema and lichenoid changes and symptoms may adequately capture the activity of oral cGVHD in clinical trials but require prospective validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Treister
- Division of Oral Medicine and Dentistry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is an effective immunotherapy for human cancer. More than 20 000 allo-HCTs are performed each year worldwide, primarily for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Several technical innovations implemented in allo-HCT over past 2 decades have reduced NRM by 50% and improved overall survival. The allo-HCT practice has changed with the introduction of peripheral blood, cord blood, and haploidentical transplantations and reduced-intensity conditioning, and the patient population is also different regarding age and diagnosis. However, both acute and chronic GVHD remain serious barriers to successful allo-HCT and it is not clear that a major improvement has occurred in our ability to prevent or treat GVHD. Nevertheless, there is an increasing knowledge of the biology and clinical manifestations and the field is getting better organized. These advances will almost certainly lead to major progress in the near future. As the long list of new potential targets and respective drugs are developed, systems need to be developed for rapid testing of them in clinical practice. The current reality is that no single agent has yet to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for GVHD prevention or therapy. Although a primary goal of these efforts is to develop better therapies for GVHD, the ultimate goal is to develop treatments that lead to effective prevention or preemption of life-threatening and disabling GVHD manifestations while harnessing the desirable graft-versus-tumor effects.
Collapse
|
39
|
Palmer JM, Lee SJ, Chai X, Storer BE, Flowers MED, Schultz KR, Inamoto Y, Cutler C, Pidala J, Arora M, Jacobsohn DA, Carpenter PA, Pavletic SZ, Martin PJ. Poor agreement between clinician response ratings and calculated response measures in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18:1649-55. [PMID: 22691695 PMCID: PMC3448865 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2012] [Accepted: 05/09/2012] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In 2005, a National Institutes of Health consensus conference was held to refine methods for research in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease, including proposed objective response measures and a provisional algorithm for calculating organ-specific and overall response. In this study, we used weighted kappa statistics to evaluate the level of agreement between clinician response ratings and calculated response categories in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease. The study included 290 patients who had paired enrollment and follow-up visits. Based on a set of objective measures, 37% of the patients had an overall complete or partial response, whereas clinicians reported an overall complete or partial response rate of 71% (slight to fair agreement, weighted kappa 0.20). Agreement rates between calculated organ-specific responses and clinician-reported changes in skin, mouth, and eyes were fair to moderate (weighted kappa, 0.28-0.54). We conclude that for both overall and organ-specific comparisons, clinician response ratings did not agree well with calculated response categories. Possible reasons for this discrepancy include a high clinical sensitivity for detecting response, a clinical predisposition to recognize selective improvements as overall response, the large change in objective measures proposed to define response, and the high incidence of progressive disease based on new manifestations. Conclusions from prior literature reporting high overall response rates based on clinician judgment would not be supported if the provisional algorithm had been applied to calculate response. Our analysis also highlights the need to define an overall response measure that incorporates both patient-reported and objective measures and accurately reflects the outcome in patients with a mixed response in which one organ or site improves, whereas another shows new involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne M Palmer
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
|
41
|
Tavares RDCBDS, Silva MDM, Bouzas LFDS, Rodrigues MC, Vigorito AC, Funke V, Mauad M, Correa MEP, de Souza CV, Nunes E, Ferrari A, Paixão A, Martins T, Pallottino E, Flowers MED. Brazilian workshop model to train investigators in chronic graft-versus-host disease clinical trials according to the 2005-2006 National Institutes of Health recommendations. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2012; 33:358-66. [PMID: 23049340 PMCID: PMC3415790 DOI: 10.5581/1516-8484.20110099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2011] [Accepted: 07/19/2011] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The lack of standardization of clinical diagnostic criteria, classification and severity scores of chronic graft-versus-host disease led the National Institutes of Health to propose consensus criteria for the purpose of clinical trials. Method Here we describe a one-day workshop model conducted by the Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Brazil-Seattle Consortium Study Group to train investigators interested in participating in multicenter clinical trials in Brazil. Workshop participants included eight transplant physicians, one dermatologist, two dentists, three physical therapists and one psychologist from five institutions. Workshop participants evaluated nine patients with varying degrees of severity of mucocutaneous lesions and other manifestations of the disease followed by a training session to review and discuss the issues encountered with the evaluation and scoring of patients and in the methods used to evaluate grip strength and the 2-minute walk test. Results Most participants had difficulties in rating the percentage of each type of mucocutaneous lesion and thought 20 minutes was insufficient to evaluate and record the scores of each patient using the National Institutes of Health criteria and other cutaneous assessments. Several specific areas of difficulties encountered by the evaluators were: 1) determining the percentage of erythema in movable and non-movable sclerosis, 2) whether to score all cutaneous findings in a particular area or just the dominant lesion; 3) clarification of the definition of poikiloderma in chronic graft-versus-host disease; 4) discrepant interpretation of the mouth score and 5) clarification on the methodology used for the evaluation of grip strength and the 2-minute walk tests. Conclusions Results of this workshop support the need to train investigators participating in clinical trials on chronic graft-versus-host disease.
Collapse
|
42
|
Arora M, Pidala J, Cutler CS, Chai X, Kurland B, Jacobsohn DA, Pavletic SZ, Palmer J, Vogelsang G, Jagasia M, Schultz K, Lee SJ. Impact of prior acute GVHD on chronic GVHD outcomes: a chronic graft versus host disease consortium study. Leukemia 2012; 27:1196-201. [PMID: 23047477 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2012.292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
43
|
Tecchio C, Mosna F, Andreini A, Paoli L, Di Bella R, de Sabata D, Sorio M, Pizzolo G, Benedetti F. The National Institutes of Health criteria for classification and scoring of chronic graft versus host disease: long-term follow-up of a single center series. Leuk Lymphoma 2012; 54:1020-7. [PMID: 23035648 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2012.733877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
We assessed the retrospective applicability and prognostic value of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) classification of chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) in 159 consecutive patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Seventy-four patients (46.5%) were affected by late-acute GVHD (n = 19; 25.7%), classic cGVHD (n = 44; 59.4%) and overlap syndrome (n = 11; 14.9%). Overall, patients with NIH-defined cGVHD (i.e. classic cGVHD and overlap syndrome) had better 10-year overall survival (OS) as compared to patients without GVHD (76.9% vs. 47.4%, p = 0.0002) or with late-acute GVHD (47.4%, p = 0.001). Relapse mortality (RM) was lower in patients with NIH-defined cGVHD than in patients without GVHD (14.5% vs. 38.7%, p = 0.001), but comparable to that of late-acute type (19.4%, p = 0.31). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was lower in patients with NIH-defined cGVHD as compared to late-acute GVHD (10.0% vs. 41.1%, p = 0.0005), as well as patients without GVHD (22.2%, p = 0.045). At multivariate analysis, NIH-defined cGVHD remained independently predictive for lower RM, but not for NRM. Thus, the new NIH classification identifies two subtypes of GVHD (late-acute and chronic) with different long-term outcomes and impact on RM and NRM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Tecchio
- Section of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona , Verona , Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Inamoto Y, Martin PJ, Chai X, Jagasia M, Palmer J, Pidala J, Cutler C, Pavletic SZ, Arora M, Jacobsohn D, Carpenter PA, Flowers MED, Khera N, Vogelsang GB, Weisdorf D, Storer BE, Lee SJ. Clinical benefit of response in chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18:1517-24. [PMID: 22683612 PMCID: PMC3443259 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2012] [Accepted: 05/31/2012] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
To determine whether changes in objective response measures proposed by the National Institutes of Health correlate with clinical benefit, such as symptom burden, quality of life, and survival outcomes, we analyzed data from a multicenter prospective cohort of 283 patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease requiring systemic treatment. The median follow-up time of survivors was 25.1 months (range, 5.4-47.7 months) after enrollment. Symptom measures included the Lee symptom scale and 10-point patient-reported symptoms. Quality-of-life measures included the Short Form-36, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplantation, and Human Activities Profile. Overall and organ-specific responses were calculated by comparing manifestations at the 6-month visit and those at the enrollment visit using a provisional algorithm. Complete or partial responses were considered "response," and stable or progressive disease was considered "no response." Overall response rate at 6 months was 32%. Organ-specific response rates were 45% for skin, 23% for eyes, 32% for mouth, and 51% for gastrointestinal tract. Response at 6 months, as calculated according to the provisional response algorithm, was correlated with changes in symptom burden in patients with newly diagnosed chronic graft-versus-host disease, but not with changes in quality of life or survival outcomes. Modification of the algorithm or validation of other more meaningful clinical endpoints is warranted for future clinical trials of treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihiro Inamoto
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Correlation between NIH composite skin score, patient-reported skin score, and outcome: results from the Chronic GVHD Consortium. Blood 2012; 120:2545-52; quiz 2774. [PMID: 22773386 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-04-424135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
There are no validated criteria to measure skin response in chronic GVHD. In a prospectively assembled, multicenter cohort of patients with chronic GVHD (N = 458), we looked for correlation of change in several different scales recommended by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus with clinician and patient perception of change and overall survival. Of the clinician scales, the NIH composite 0-3 skin score was the only one that correlated with both clinician and patient perception of improvement or worsening. Of the patient-reported scales, the skin subscale of the Lee Symptom Scale was the only one that correlated with both clinician and patient perception of improvement or worsening. At study entry, NIH skin score 3 and Lee skin symptom score > 15 were both associated with worse overall survival. Worsening of NIH skin score at 6 months was associated with worse overall survival. Improvement in the Lee skin symptom score at 6 months was associated with improved overall survival. Our findings support the use of the NIH composite 0-3 skin score and the Lee skin symptom score as simple and sensitive measures to evaluate skin involvement in clinical trials as well as in the clinical monitoring of patients with cutaneous chronic GVHD.
Collapse
|
46
|
Chronic GVHD: Where are we? Where do we want to be? Will immunomodulatory drugs help? Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 48:203-9. [DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
47
|
Kitko CL, White ES, Baird K. Fibrotic and sclerotic manifestations of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18:S46-52. [PMID: 22226112 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie L Kitko
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Levine JE, Paczesny S, Sarantopoulos S. Clinical applications for biomarkers of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18:S116-24. [PMID: 22226094 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD, cGVHD) are serious complications of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The complex pathophysiology of these disease processes is associated with immune system activation, the release of cytokines and chemokines, and alterations in cell populations. The blood levels of specific protein and cellular levels in patients with GVHD have correlated with the development, diagnosis, and prognosis of GVHD. Here, we review the most promising biomarkers for aGVHD and cGVHD with clinical relevance. The utility of GVHD biomarkers in clinical care of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients needs to be proven through clinical trials, and potential approaches to trial design are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John E Levine
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5941, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Inamoto Y, Chai X, Kurland BF, Cutler C, Flowers MED, Palmer JM, Carpenter PA, Heffernan MJ, Jacobsohn D, Jagasia MH, Pidala J, Khera N, Vogelsang GB, Weisdorf D, Martin PJ, Pavletic SZ, Lee SJ. Validation of measurement scales in ocular graft-versus-host disease. Ophthalmology 2011; 119:487-93. [PMID: 22153706 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2011] [Revised: 08/24/2011] [Accepted: 08/25/2011] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To validate measurement scales for rating ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Candidate scales were recommended for use in clinical trials by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Chronic GVHD Consensus Conference or have been previously validated in dry eye syndromes. DESIGN Prospective follow-up study. PARTICIPANTS Between August 2007 and June 2010, the study enrolled 387 patients with chronic GVHD in a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort. METHODS Using anchor-based methods, we compared clinician or patient-reported changes in eye symptoms (8-point scale) with calculated changes in 5 candidate scales: The NIH eye score, patient-reported global rating of eye symptoms, Lee eye subscale, Ocular Surface Disease Index, and Schirmer test. Change was examined for 333 follow-up visits where both clinician and patient reported eye involvement at the previous visit. Linear mixed models were used to account for within-patient correlation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES An 8-point scale of clinician or patient-reported symptom change was used as an anchor to measure symptom changes at the follow-up visits. RESULTS In serial evaluations, agreement regarding improvement, stability, or worsening between the clinician and patient was fair (weighted kappa = 0.34). Despite only fair agreement between evaluators, all scales except the Schirmer test correlated with both clinician-reported and patient-reported changes in ocular GVHD activity. Among all scales, changes in the NIH eye scores showed the greatest sensitivity to symptom change reported by clinicians or patients. CONCLUSIONS Our results support the use of the NIH eye score as a sensitive measure of eye symptom changes in clinical trials assessing treatment of chronic GVHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihiro Inamoto
- Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pidala J, Vogelsang G, Martin P, Chai X, Storer B, Pavletic S, Weisdorf DJ, Jagasia M, Cutler C, Palmer J, Jacobsohn D, Arai S, Lee SJ. Overlap subtype of chronic graft-versus-host disease is associated with an adverse prognosis, functional impairment, and inferior patient-reported outcomes: a Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Consortium study. Haematologica 2011; 97:451-8. [PMID: 22058206 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2011.055186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference proposed the term "overlap" graft-versus-host disease to describe the situation when both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease are present. DESIGN AND METHODS We examined whether the overlap subtype of graft-versus-host disease was associated with a different prognosis, functional limitations, or patient-reported outcomes compared to "classic" chronic graft-versus-host disease without any acute features. RESULTS Prospective data were collected from 427 patients from nine centers. Patients were classified as having overlap (n=352) or classic chronic (n=75) graft-versus-host disease based on reported organ involvement. Overlap cases had a significantly shorter median time from transplantation to cohort enrollment (P=0.01), were more likely to be incident cases (P<0.001), and had a lower platelet count at onset of the graft-versus-host disease (P<0.001). Patients with overlap graft-versus-host disease had significantly greater functional impairment measured by a 2-minute walk test, higher symptom burden and lower Human Activity Profile scores. Quality of life was similar, except patients with overlap graft-versus-host disease had worse social functioning, assessed by the Short Form-36. Multivariable analysis utilizing time-varying covariates demonstrated that the overlap subtype of graft-versus-host disease was associated with worse overall survival (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.7; P=0.03) and higher non-relapse mortality (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.2-8.3; P=0.02) than classic chronic graft-versus-host disease. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that the presence of acute features in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease is a marker of adverse prognosis, greater functional impairment, and higher symptom burden.
Collapse
|