ABO mismatch is associated with increased nonrelapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Impact of myelofibrosis on patients with myelodysplastic syndromes following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of myelofibrosis (MF) grade in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) following an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains elusive.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 153 patients with MDS who underwent allo-HSCT and divided the patients into the MF-0/1 (N = 119) and MF-2/3 (N = 34) cohorts to explore the impact of MF on outcomes of allo-HSCT.

RESULTS

The 2-year rates of relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were 10.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.9%-17.7%), 16.3% (95% CI 10.2%-23.6%), 76.6% (95% CI 69.0%-85.1%), and 72.8% (95% CI 65.0%-81.5%) in the MF-0/1 cohort, and 16.9% (95% CI 5.8%-32.9%), 14.7% (95% CI 5.3%-28.7%), 71.8% (95% CI 57.6%-89.6%), and 68.4% (95% CI 53.6%-87.2%) in the MF-2/3 cohort, respectively. No significant difference in the outcomes of allo-HSCT was observed between the two cohorts. Both univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that MF-2/3 in patients with MDS had no effect on the prognosis of transplantation. In addition, major/bidirectional ABO blood type between donors and recipients was an independent risk factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.55; 95% CI 1.25-5.21; P = 0.010) and PFS (HR, 2.21; 95% CI 1.10-4.42; P = 0.025) in the multivariate analysis. In the subgroup of patients diagnosed with MDS with increased blasts (MDS-IB), it was consistently demonstrated that the clinical outcomes of the MF-2/3 cohort were comparable with those of the MF-0/1 cohort. The risk factors for OS and PFS in patients with MDS-IB were non-complete remission at transplantation and major/bidirectional ABO blood type.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, MF grade had no significant effect on prognosis of allo-HSCT in patients diagnosed with MDS. Major/bidirectional ABO blood type should be carefully considered in the context of more than one available donor.

Donor Selection for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

In Germany, each year over 3000 patients with malignant and non-malignant hematologic and systemic diseases are treated by allo - geneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Genetic donor-recipient disparities, especially those concerning variable human leukocyte antigens (HLA), mediate both an immunotherapeutic effect and the risk of damage to healthy tissues ("graft-versus-host disease"). The adoption of evidencebased strategies for donor selection has been crucial for the continuous improvement of survival rates after allogeneic HCT, with over 50% of patients transplanted for standard indications-such as early-stage acute myeloid leukemia-alive at three years post-transplant.

METHODS

The PubMed database was selectively searched for literature on immunogenetic and clinical factors relevant to allogeneic HCT, as part of the process of establishing a German consensus statement on HCT donor selection.

RESULTS

The most important factor in donor selection is a match for the five major HLA loci (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DR, -DQ), either in genetically HLAidentical siblings or in unrelated but fully HLA-compatible donors from international registries. Additional selection criteria for the latter include com - patibility for the HLA-DP locus, donor age and sex, cytomegalovirus serostatus, and blood group. Related donors identical for only 50% of the HLA genes (haploidentical donors) as well as unrelated donors with a single HLA mismatch are both valid alternatives although they are associated with an up to 10% higher risk of mortality.

CONCLUSION

The refinement of donor selection strategies has been instrumental for the continuous improvement of patient survival rates after allogeneic HCT witnessed over the past decades. An interdisciplinary approach to donor selection based on up-to-date scientific evidence is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Association of ABO mismatch with the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). While many factors influence the outcomes of allo-HCT, the independent impact of donor-recipient ABO mismatching remains unclear. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we identified patients aged ≥18 years with AML or ALL who underwent allo-HCT between 2008 and 2018. Our objectives were to analyze the outcomes of allo-HCT based on the donor-recipient ABO status (match, minor mismatch, major mismatch, bidirectional mismatch). Among 4946 eligible patients, 2741 patients (55.4%) were ABO matched, 1030 patients (20.8%) had a minor ABO mismatch, 899 patients (18.1%) had a major ABO mismatch, and 276 patients (5.6%) had a bidirectional ABO mismatch. In multivariable analyses, compared to ABO matched allo-HCT, the presence of a major ABO mismatch was associated with worse overall survival (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.29; p = 0.005), inferior platelet engraftment (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.90; p < 0.001), and higher primary graft failure (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.12-2.30, p = 0.01). Relapse, acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) grades III-IV and chronic GVHD were not significantly associated with ABO status. While donor age was not significantly associated with outcomes, older recipient age was associated with worse survival and non-relapse mortality. Our study demonstrates that donor-recipient ABO status is independently associated with survival and other post-transplantation outcomes in acute leukemia. This underscores the importance of considering the ABO status in donor selection algorithms and its impact in acute leukemia.

[ABO incompatibility and complications in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]

Background

Hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) can be performed regardless of the ABO group compatibility between donor and recipient. ABO incompatibility in HSCT is related to pure red cell aplasia (PRCA), or passenger lymphocyte syndrome. The impact of ABO incompatibility on graft-versus-host disease and transplant-related mortality is controversial due to the heterogeneity of procedures carried out in different transplant centers.

Objective

To determine the prevalence of ABO incompatibility and its complications in a hematopoietic stem transplant unit.

Material and methods

An observational, retrospective study was carried out in patients undergoing HSCT from January 2014 to January 2020. All trasplant patients were included. Qualitative variables were analyzed using chi-squared test, and Wilcoxon and Student's t tests were used for quantitative variables. A p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

124 patients undergoing HSCT were analyzed, out of which 31 had ABO incompatibility, with a punctual prevalence of 24.4%; among them, 54% presented with major incompatibility, 32% minor incompatibility and 13% bidirectional incompatibility. Three cases of PRCA were reported. There were no differences in survival at one year in both groups.

Conclusions

The ABO incompatibility ant its complications were not related to the increase in mortality. Randomized prospective studies are required to define the role of ABO incompatibility in HSCT prognosis.

Impact of Donor-to-Recipient ABO Mismatch on Outcomes of Antithymocyte Globulin-Based Peripheral Blood Stem Cell-Derived Myeloablative Conditioning Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation

ABO incompatibility is common in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); however, the impact of donor-recipient ABO compatibility on transplantation outcomes in different HSCT settings is controversial. Moreover, haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) with peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC)-derived grafts has not been well investigated. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of ABO incompatibility on post-transplantation outcomes, engraftment kinetics, blood product requirements, transfusion independence, and the incidence of poor graft function (PGF) in antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based haplo-SCT with PBSC grafts during long-term follow-up. We prospectively evaluated 510 patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent haplo-SCT after myeloablative conditioning (MAC). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were nonrelapse mortality (NRM), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), relapse, neutrophil and platelet engraftment, blood transfusion requirements, transfusion independence, and the incidence of PGF. There was no significant association between ABO matching and OS, disease-free survival (DFS), relapse, NRM, grade II-IV acute GVHD, grade III-IV acute GVHD, and moderate and severe chronic GVHD. There were also no significant differences in neutrophil and platelet engraftment, blood transfusion independence, and transfusion requirements at 30, 60, 90, 180, and 365 days post-transplantation among patients with ABO matching and those with minor, major, or bidirectional ABO incompatibility. Donor-recipient ABO matching did not differ significantly according to graft function (good versus poor). ABO incompatibility status has no major impact on patient outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing ATG-based MAC haplo-SCT with PBSC-derived grafts.

Thoracic Air Leak Syndrome, Pulmonary Aspergillosis, and COVID-19 Pneumonia After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in a Child With Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Thoracic air leak syndromes (TALS) are very rare among the noninfectious pulmonary complications (PCs). They can either be idiopathic or have several risk factors such as allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), graft versus host disease and rarely pulmonary aspergillosis. We present a 14-year-old girl with hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndrome who developed graft versus host disease on day 60, TALS on day 150, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome on day 300, pulmonary aspergillosis on day 400 and COVID-19 pneumonia on day 575 after allo-HSCT. This is the first report of a child who developed these subsequent PCs after allo-HSCT. Therefore, the manifestations of these unfamiliar PCs like TALS and COVID-19 pneumonia, and concomitant pulmonary aspergillosis with management options are discussed.

Post-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Immune-Mediated Anemia: A Literature Review and Novel Therapeutics

Anemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can be immune or non–immune mediated. Auto- or alloimmunity resulting from blood group incompatibility remains an important cause in post-HSCT immune-mediated anemia. ABO incompatibility is commonly encountered in HSCT and may lead to serious clinical complications, including acute hemolysis, pure red cell aplasia, and passenger lymphocyte syndrome. It remains controversial whether ABO incompatibility may affect HSCT outcomes, such as relapse, nonrelapse mortality, graft-versus-host disease, and survival. Non-ABO incompatibility is less frequently encountered but can have similar complications to ABO incompatibility, causing adverse clinical outcomes. It is crucial to identify the driving etiology of post-HSCT anemia in order to prevent and treat this condition. This requires a comprehensive understanding of the mechanism of anemia in blood group–incompatible HSCT and the temporal association between HSCT and anemia. In this review, we summarize the literature on post-HSCT immune-mediated anemia with a focus on ABO and non-ABO blood group incompatibility, describe the underlying mechanism of anemia, and outline preventive and treatment approaches.

Effect of donor characteristics on T cell-replete haploidentical stem cell transplantation over the last 10 years at a single institution

One of the most complex issues with haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) is donor selection, given that multiple haploidentical donors are often available for a given recipient. To develop evidence-based guidance for donor selection in the setting of anti-thymocyte globulin-based haplo-SCT, we performed a prospective cohort study of 512 patients with haematological malignancies who had haplo-SCT to determine which donor variables were most important in favouring transplant outcomes. Increasing donor age was associated with poorer overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) 1·08, P = 0·044]. Female donors to male recipients was significantly associated with higher non-relapse mortality (NRM; HR 2·05, P = 0·006). Furthermore, increasing donor age had a higher risk of Grades 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD; HR 1·17, P = 0·005), female donors to male recipients was associated with a higher risk of Grades 2-4 aGVHD (HR 1·50, P = 0·022). Sibling donors had superior OS, disease-free survival, and NRM than parental donors in patients aged <35 years. However, sibling donors had higher NRM than offspring donors in patients aged ≥35 years. A younger donor, usually a young sibling in younger recipients (aged <35 years) or a young offspring in older patients (aged ≥35 years) and avoiding female donors to male recipients should be preferred when multiple haploidentical donors are available.

A novel Iowa-Mayo validated composite risk assessment tool for allogeneic stem cell transplantation survival outcome prediction

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative option for many hematologic conditions and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Therefore, prognostic tools are essential to navigate the complex patient, disease, donor, and transplant characteristics that differentially influence outcomes. We developed a novel, comprehensive composite prognostic tool. Using a lasso-penalized Cox regression model (n = 273), performance status, HCT-CI, refined disease-risk index (rDRI), donor and recipient CMV status, and donor age were identified as predictors of disease-free survival (DFS). The results for overall survival (OS) were similar except for recipient CMV status not being included in the model. Models were validated in an external dataset (n = 378) and resulted in a c-statistic of 0.61 and 0.62 for DFS and OS, respectively. Importantly, this tool incorporates donor age as a variable, which has an important role in HSCT outcomes. This needs to be further studied in prospective models. An easy-to-use and a web-based nomogram can be accessed here: https://allohsctsurvivalcalc.iowa.uiowa.edu/ .

ABO Mismatch in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: Effect on Short- and Long-term Outcomes

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

The impact of ABO incompatibility (ABO-I) on hematopoietic stem cell transplant outcomes is still debated.

Methods.

We retrospectively investigated 432 consecutive transplants performed at our center (2012–2020). All patients but 6 were affected by hematologic malignancies. The effect of different ABO match combinations on engraftment rate, transfusion support, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease incidences, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), disease-free survival, and overall survival was assessed in univariate and multivariate analysis. Significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results.

ABO match distribution among transplants was as follows: 223 ABO-compatible, 94 major ABO-I, 82 minor ABO-I, and 33 bidirectional ABO-I. At univariate analysis, major ABO-I delayed the engraftment of neutrophils, platelets, and erythroid cells. At multivariate analysis, major ABO-I transplants displayed delayed erythroid engraftment (odds ratio [OR], 0.51; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.38-0.70; P < 0.0001) and hindered transfusion independence for both red blood cells (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.72; P = 0.0001) and platelets (0.60; 95% CI, 0.45-0.86; P = 0.0048). Moreover, major ABO-I transplants received greater amounts of blood products (P < 0.0001 for red blood cells and P = 0.0447 for platelets). In comparison with other ABO matches, major ABO-I was associated with an increased NRM (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.01-2.75; P = 0.0427). No effects of ABO-mismatch were found on graft-versus-host disease, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

Conclusions.

Major ABO mismatch delays multilineage engraftment hinders transfusion independence and increases NRM. The prognostic impact of transfusion burden in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation deserves to be explored.

Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy in pediatric patients: pre-HSCT risk stratification and prophylaxis

Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is an endothelial injury syndrome that complicates hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Morbidity and mortality from TA-TMA remain high, making prevention critical. We describe our retrospective single-center experience of TA-TMA after pediatric allogeneic HSCT and present a novel pre-HSCT risk-stratification system and prophylaxis regimen. From January 2012 through October 2019, 257 patients underwent 292 allogeneic HSCTs. Prospective risk stratification was introduced in December 2016. High-risk (HR) patients were treated with combination prophylaxis with eicosapentaenoic acid and N-acetylcysteine. The 1-year cumulative incidence of TA-TMA was 6.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2-9.4). Age ≥10 years, myeloablative conditioning with total body irradiation, HLA mismatch, diagnosis of severe aplastic anemia or malignancy, prior calcineurin inhibitor exposure, and recipient cytomegalovirus seropositivity were found to be pre-HSCT risk factors for development of TA-TMA. Before routine prophylaxis, TA-TMA rates were significantly different between the HR and standard-risk groups, at 28.2% (95% CI, 0-12.7) vs 3.2% (0.1-6.3), respectively (P < .001). After introduction of prophylaxis, the 1-year cumulative incidence of TA-TMA in the HR group decreased to 4.5% (95% CI, 0-13.1; P = .062, compared with the incidence before prophylaxis). Multicenter pediatric studies are needed to validate these risk criteria and to confirm the efficacy of the prophylactic regimen.

Optimizing selection of double cord blood units for transplantation of adult patients with malignant diseases

Double-unit unrelated cord blood transplantation (DUCBT) is an option in patients for whom a single unit is not sufficient to provide an adequate number of cells. As current guidelines on UCB unit selection are mainly based on single-unit UCB data, we performed a retrospective analysis of 1375 adult recipients of DUCBT for hematologic malignancies to determine optimal criteria for graft selection. Cryopreserved total nucleated cells (TNCs; ≤3.5 vs >3.5 × 107/kg: hazard ratio [HR], 1.53; 30% vs 45%; P = .01), number of HLA mismatches (≥2 vs 0-1: HR, 1.28; 42% vs 48%; P = .01), and ABO compatibility (minor/major ABO incompatibility vs compatibility: HR, 1.28; P = .04) were independent risk factors for OS. Cryopreserved CD34+ cell dose ≥0.7 × 105/kg in the winning UCB was associated with improved OS (HR, 1.34; P = .03). Low TNC (≤3.5 × 107/kg) and CD34+ (≤1.4 × 105/kg) cell doses were related to decreased neutrophil recovery (HR, 0.65 [P = .01] and HR, 0.81 [P = .01], respectively). DUCBT recipients with ≥2 HLA mismatches had a higher incidence of grade II-IV and III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (HR, 1.26 [P = .03] and 1.59 [P = .02], respectively). Low TNC dose (HR, 1.57; P = .02) and receiving UCB with ≥2 HLA mismatches (HR, 1.35; P = .03) were associated with increased transplant-related mortality. Our data support selecting adequately HLA-matched UCB units with a double-unit cryopreserved TNC dose >3.5 × 107/kg and CD34+ cell dose of ≥0.7 × 105/kg per unit in DUCBT candidates.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Sickle Cell Disease

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a severe autosomal recessively inherited disorder of the red blood cell characterized by erythrocyte deformation caused by the polymerization of the abnormal hemoglobin, which leads to erythrocyte deformation and triggers downstream pathological changes. These include abnormal rheology, vaso-occlusion, ischemic tissue damage, and hemolysis-associated endothelial dysfunction. These acute and chronic physiologic disturbances contribute to morbidity, organ dysfunction, and diminished survival. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from HLA-matched or unrelated donors or haploidentical related donors or genetically modified autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells is performed with the intent of cure or long-term amelioration of disease manifestations. Excellent outcomes have been observed following HLA-identical matched related donor HCT. The majority of SCD patients do not have an available HLA-identical sibling donor. Increasingly, however, they have the option of undergoing HCT from unrelated HLA matched or related haploidentical donors. The preliminary results of transplantation of autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells genetically modified by adding a non-sickling gene or by genomic editing to increase expression of fetal hemoglobin are encouraging. These approaches are being evaluated in early-phase clinical trials. In performing HCT in patients with SCD, careful consideration must be given to patient and donor selection, conditioning and graft-vs.-host disease regimen, and pre-HCT evaluation and management during and after HCT. Sociodemographic factors may also impact awareness of and access to HCT. Further, there is a substantial decisional dilemma in HCT with complex tradeoffs between the possibility of amelioration of disease manifestations and early or late complications of HCT. The performance of HCT for SCD requires careful multidisciplinary collaboration and shared decision making between the physician and informed patients and caregivers.

[Relevance of antibodies in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Antibodies anti-HLA, anti-platelets, anti-granulocytes, anti-erythrocytes and anti-MICA. Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]

The presence of allo-antibodies in the serum of a recipient awaiting hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may have an impact on transfusion efficiency and/or donor choice, especially in the absence of an identical sibling donor. Prior to transplantation, donor specific anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) antibodies (DSA) have a recognized effect on transplant outcome, correlated with the increasing MFI value and with the ability of such antibody to fix the complement fraction. Anti-platelet antibodies (anti-HLA class I and anti-HPA [Human Platelet Antigen]) are better involved in transfusion inefficiency and can be responsible for refractory status. ABO incompatibilities require a specific treatment of the graft in presence of high titer to avoid hemolytic adverse effects. Investigations of these antibodies should be carried out on a regular basis in order to establish appropriate transfusion recommendation, select an alternative donor when possible or adapt the source of cells. After transplantation, in case of delayed recovery or graft rejection, long term aplasia, persistent mixed chimerism or late release, and after elimination of the main clinical causes, a biological assessment targeted on the different type of antibodies will have to be performed in order to orient towards the cause or the appropriate therapy. Further studies should be carried out to determine the impact of anti-MICA antibodies and recipient specific anti-HLA antibodies, on the outcome of the transplantation.

How I treat sickle cell disease with hematopoietic cell transplantation

Sickle cell disease (SCD) leads to significant morbidity and early mortality, and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only widely available cure, with impacts seen on SCD-related organ dysfunction. Outcomes are excellent following matched-related donor (MRD) HCT, leading to significantly expanded application of this treatment over the past decade. The majority of SCD patients lack an MRD, but outcomes following alternative donor HCT continue to improve on clinical trials. Within this framework, we aim to provide our perspective on how to apply research findings to clinical practice, for an individual patient. We also emphasize that the preparation of SCD recipients for HCT and supporting them through HCT have special nuances that require awareness and close attention. Through the use of clinical vignettes, we provide our perpsective on the complex decision-making process in HCT for SCD as well as recommendations for the evaluation and support of these patients through HCT.

ABO Blood Type Incompatibility Is Not a Risk Factor of Outcomes for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients After Unmanipulated Haplo-identical Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND Haplo-identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has provided potential donors for patients lacking available HLA-matched donors. ABO blood type compatibility has been reported to be associated with HSCT outcomes. However, few studies have investigated the role of ABO compatibility in haplo-identical HSCT of AML patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 42 adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who received unmanipulated haplo-identical peripheral blood HSCT at the Chinese PLA General Hospital between Jan 2013 and Dec 2017. We analyzed the role of ABO compatibility in engraftment, transfusion requirements, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viremia, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), overall survival (OS), transplantation-related mortality (TRM), relapse, chronic GVHD, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). RESULTS There were no significant differences between the ABO-matched group and the ABO-mismatched group in terms of engraftment, transfusion requirements, CMV and EBV viremia, OS, TRM, relapse, PTLD, and chronic GVHD. Univariate analysis revealed ABO incompatibility is not an independent risk factor of engraftment, transfusion requirements, CMV and EBV viremia, OS, TRM, relapse, PTLD, and chronic GVHD. We found a significantly higher cumulative incidence of aGVHD in the matched group compared with the mismatched group (80.95% vs. 42.86%, p=0.020). In multivariate analysis, ABO mismatch was associated with decreased risk of acute GVHD within 100 days after transplant (hazard ratio 0.492, 95% confidence interval 0.2123-1.14). However, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.099). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated ABO incompatibility is not an independent risk factor of outcomes for AML patients who received unmanipulated haplo-identical peripheral blood HSCT. ABO compatibility might have limited value in haplo-identical donor selection.

ABO blood type incompatibility lost the unfavorable impact on outcome in unrelated bone marrow transplantation

The effects of ABO incompatibility on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remain controversial. Large cohorts are required to obtain findings that allow for definite conclusions. We previously demonstrated poor overall survival and increased treatment-related mortality (TRM) in ABO-incompatible unrelated bone marrow transplantation (UR-BMT) performed during the period from 1993 to 2005. To improve our understanding of ABO-incompatible transplantation, we reanalyzed the effects of ABO mismatch in a UR-BMT cohort in Japan after 2000. Multivariate analyses for the 2000-2006 cohort showed that major ABO mismatch was associated with poor overall survival (HR, 1.211; 95% CI, 1.062 to 1.381; p = 0.004) and increased TRM (HR, 1.357; 95% CI, 1.146 to 1.608; p < 0.001). In the 2007-2015 cohort, major incompatibility had no effect on overall survival (HR, 0.987, p = 0.804) or TRM (HR, 1.020, p = 0.790). Delayed engraftment of erythrocytes, platelets, and neutrophils in cases of major mismatch was common between the two cohorts. In conclusion, the adverse effect of ABO major incompatibility has become less significant over time.

The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) consensus recommendations for donor selection in haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation

The number of HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplants continues to increase worldwide due to recent improvements in outcomes, allowing more patients with hematological malignancies and non-malignant disorders to benefit from this procedure and have a chance to cure their disease. Despite these encouraging results, questions remain as multiple donors are usually available for transplantation, and choosing the best HLA-haploidentical donor for transplantation remains a challenge. Several approaches to haploidentical transplantation have been developed over time and, based on the graft received, can be grouped as follows: T-cell depleted haploidentical transplants, either complete or partial, or with T-cell replete grafts, performed with post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, or G-CSF-primed bone marrow graft and enhanced GVHD prophylaxis. Carefully selecting the donor can help optimize transplant outcomes for recipients of haploidentical donor transplants. Variables usually considered in the donor selection include presence of donor-specific antibodies in the recipient, donor age, donor/recipient gender and ABO combinations, and immunogenic variables, such as natural killer cell alloreactivity or KIR haplotype. Here we provide a comprehensive review of available evidence for selecting haploidentical donors for transplantation, and summarize the recommendations from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) on donor selection for different transplant platforms.

Transplant-Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy in Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Practical Approach to Diagnosis and Management

Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is an endothelial damage syndrome that is increasingly identified as a complication of both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in children. If not promptly diagnosed and treated, TA-TMA can lead to significant morbidity (e.g., permanent renal injury) or mortality. However, as the recognition of the early stages of TA-TMA may be difficult, we propose a TA-TMA "triad" of hypertension, thrombocytopenia (or platelet transfusion refractoriness), and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). While not diagnostic, this triad should prompt further evaluation for TA-TMA. There is increased understanding of the risk factors for the development of TA-TMA, including those which are inherent (e.g., race, genetics), transplant approach-related (e.g., second HCT, use of HLA-mismatched donors), and related to post-transplant events (e.g., receipt of calcineurin inhibitors, development of graft-vs. -host-disease, or certain infections). This understanding should lead to enhanced screening for TA-TMA signs and symptoms in high-risk patients. The pathophysiology of TA-TMA is complex, resulting from a cycle of activation of endothelial cells to produce a pro-coagulant state, along with activation of antigen-presenting cells and lymphocytes, as well as activation of the complement cascade and microthrombi formation. This has led to the formulation of a "Three-Hit Hypothesis" in which patients with either an underlying predisposition to complement activation or pre-existing endothelial injury (Hit 1) undergo a toxic conditioning regimen causing endothelial injury (Hit 2), and then additional insults are triggered by medications, alloreactivity, infections, and/or antibodies (Hit 3). Understanding this cycle of injury permits the development of a specific TA-TMA treatment algorithm designed to treat both the triggers and the drivers of the endothelial injury. Finally, several intriguing approaches to TA-TMA prophylaxis have been identified. Future work on the development of a single diagnostic test with high specificity and sensitivity, and the development of a robust risk-scoring system, will further improve the management of this serious post-transplant complication.

Who is the best donor for haploidentical stem cell transplantation?

Recent advances in haploidentical stem cell transplantation have enabled the use of human leukocyte antigen-half matched related donors for allogeneic stem cell transplantation and helped overcome one of the most important limitation in transplantation, which is donor availability, especially for the non-Caucasian population and mixed race individuals, extending allogeneic stem cell transplant for almost all patients in need. As many multiple potential related donors may now be available, it is increasingly clear that not all of these donors can provide equivalent transplant outcomes. Here we review the current available evidence of donor characteristics known to be associated with transplant outcomes for different types of haploidentical transplants using unmanipulated grafts (with post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-vs-host prophylaxis and G-CSF and anti-thymocyte globulin approach) as well as modified grafts (with either selective or complete T-cell depletion). While various platforms use haploidentical donors, graft manipulation and approach to prevent graft-vs-host post-transplant may impact on donor selection and transplant outcomes.

Infusion hemolysis after pediatric major ABO-mismatched bone marrow transplant: Comparison of two red blood cell depletion techniques

BACKGROUND

During major ABO-mismatched bone marrow transplant (BMT), the infusion of incompatible red blood cells (RBCs) that are present in the bone marrow graft can cause adverse events from hemolysis. RBC depletion of the bone marrow graft can decrease this risk, but the optimal method to prevent hemolysis is unclear.

PROCEDURE

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent major ABO-mismatched BMT at a pediatric center and had RBC depletion with either hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sedimentation or Ficoll density gradient separation. Postinfusion hemoglobinuria and creatinine values were compared.

RESULTS

Between 2002 and 2016, 37 patients received HES-treated and 16 patients received Ficoll-treated major ABO-mismatched bone marrow grafts. The median residual volume of RBCs was significantly greater with HES-treated grafts (HES 21.0 ml vs. Ficoll 1.4 ml, P < 0.0001). Patients who received HES-treated grafts had a higher prevalence of postinfusion hemoglobinuria (HES 57% vs. Ficoll 6%, P = 0.0009), but renal impairment was rare. Considering only HES-treated grafts, the volume of RBCs was not associated with either postinfusion hemoglobinuria or a creatinine increase.

CONCLUSIONS

Ficoll density gradient separation achieves smaller RBC volumes and less postinfusion hemoglobinuria than HES sedimentation, but both can prevent significant hemolysis. Further studies are needed to determine the residual incompatible RBC volume threshold in major ABO-mismatched BMT.

Peritransplantation Red Blood Cell Transfusion Is Associated with Increased Risk of Graft-versus-Host Disease after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

More than 90% of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients receive red blood cell (RBC) or platelet transfusions in the peritransplantation period. We tested the hypothesis that transfusions are associated with the development of severe (grade III-IV) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) or mortality after allo-HSCT in a retrospective study of 322 consecutive patients receiving an allogeneic bone marrow or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized blood stem cell graft for a hematologic malignancy. Counting transfused RBC and platelet units between day -7 pretransplantation and day +27 post-transplantation, but excluding transfusions administered after a diagnosis of aGVHD, yielded medians of 5 RBC units and 2 platelet units transfused. Sixty-three patients (20%) developed a maximal grade III-IV aGVHD with onset up to day +150 post-transplantation (median aGVHD onset of 28 days). HLA mismatch (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 4.7; P = .01), and transfusion of more than the median number of RBC units (HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.7; P = .02) were independently associated with greater risk of grade III-IV aGVHD in a multivariable analysis model. Disease risk strata (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.4 for high risk versus low risk; P = .005) and transfusion of more than the median number of RBC units (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.0; P = .054) were independently associated with inferior overall survival. These data support our hypothesis that peritransplantation RBC transfusions are associated with the risk of developing severe aGVHD and worse overall survival following allo-HSCT, and suggest that strategies to reduce routine RBC transfusion may favorably reduce the incidence and severity of GVHD.

Advances in chronic lymphocytic leukemia pharmacotherapy

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a lymphoproliferative disease that affects B lymphocytes in most cases. Leukemic lymphocytes have prolonged longevity, defined by resistance to apoptosis. These cells can accumulate in peripheral blood, bone marrow, and solid lymphoid organs. CLL may be indolent or aggressive and has a range of prognostic factors such as expression of CD38 and ZAP-70, immunophenotypic and cytogenetic changes, imbalanced apoptosis proteins, and others. Although CLL has a low mortality rate, this disease is generally not considered curable until today. CLL treatment involves alkylating agents and glucocorticoids, purine analogs, monoclonal antibody therapies, and bone marrow transplantation. In recent decades, new drugs have appeared focusing on new targets and specific molecules, such as the BCR receptor, Bruton's tyrosine kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, spleen tyrosine kinase, apoptosis proteins and microRNAs. The most appropriate treatment for CLL is one that involves in its protocol a combination of drugs according to the prognostic factors presented by each patient. In this sense, treatment individualization is essential. This article examines standard treatments for CLL and explores new treatments and potential new targets, as well as schematic protocols to understand where we are, how the treatment has evolved, and the advantages and disadvantages of new targets for CLL therapy.

ABO Incompatibility and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Outcomes

Introduction: The increased risk of hemolytic reactions and erythrocyte recovery delay in ABO incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are well established. Effects of ABO incompatibility on other transplantation outcomes are evaluated in this study. Subjects and Methods: We prospectively followed 501 patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation regarding their ABO compatibility groups for a median time of 34.7 months. Patients were studied in minor, major and bidirectional mismatched and matched groups. Results: Mean survival time (OS) was lower in minor mismatched group (p-value= 0.017). Minor and bidirectional mismatched groups received significantly more packed cell units than matched group (p-value < 0.0001 and p-value =0.002, respectively).Mean number of platelet unit infusion was significantly more in major mismatched recipients than matched group (p- value=0.031). Death rate was much more than expected in minor mismatched group. Two cases of PRCA (pure red cell aplasia) were found in major mismatched group. No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, time to neutrophil recovery, relapse- free survival, non-relapse mortality and relapse rate among groups. Conclusion: In order to prevent complications of ABO-incompatible SCT such as decrease in OS and the need for more transfusions, choosing ABO-compatible donors would improve transplantation outcomes.

Impact of ABO incompatibility on patients' outcome after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia - a report from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

A significant proportion of hematopoietic stem cell transplants are performed with ABO-mismatched donors. The impact of ABO mismatch on outcome following transplantation remains controversial and there are no published data regarding the impact of ABO mismatch in acute myeloid leukemia patients receiving haploidentical transplants. Using the European Blood and Marrow Transplant Acute Leukemia Working Group registry we identified 837 patients who underwent haploidentical transplantation. Comparative analysis was performed between patients who received ABO-matched versus ABO-mismatched haploidentical transplants for common clinical outcome variables. Our cohort consisted of 522 ABO-matched patients and 315 ABO-mismatched patients including 150 with minor, 127 with major, and 38 with bi-directional ABO mismatching. There were no significant differences between ABO matched and mismatched patients in terms of baseline disease and clinical characteristics. Major ABO mismatching was associated with inferior day 100 engraftment rate whereas multivariate analysis showed that bi-directional mismatching was associated with increased risk of grade II–IV acute graft-versus-host disease [hazard ratio (HR) 2.387; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22–4.66; P=0.01). Non-relapse mortality, relapse incidence, leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and chronic graft-versus-host disease rates were comparable between ABO-matched and -mismatched patients. Focused analysis on stem cell source showed that patients with minor mismatching transplanted with bone marrow grafts experienced increased grade II–IV acute graft-versus-host disease rates (HR 2.03; 95% CI: 1.00–4.10; P=0.04). Patients with major ABO mismatching and bone marrow grafts had decreased survival (HR=1.82; CI 95%: 1.048 – 3.18; P=0.033). In conclusion, ABO incompatibility has a marginal but significant clinical effect in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing haploidentical transplantation.

Donor-to-Recipient ABO Mismatch Does Not Impact Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Regardless of Graft Source

The impact of ABO mismatch has been studied on various hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) outcomes, including neutrophil and platelet engraftment, pure red cell aplasia, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival (OS). Yet conflicting results have been reported. However, the impact of ABO mismatch on transplant outcomes with various graft types has not been carefully investigated. We analyzed the impact of various graft sources and type of ABO mismatch on transplant outcomes for 1502 patients who underwent HCT at the University of Minnesota between 2000 and 2014: 312 receiving marrow (BM), 475 filgrastim-mobilized blood (peripheral blood stem cell [PBSC]), and 715 umbilical cord blood (UCB) grafts. Neutrophil engraftment by day 28 was marginally less frequent in the bidirectional ABO mismatched transplants receiving UCB, whereas ABO matching had no influence on engraftment in the BM or PBSC cohorts. ABO mismatch led to no significant differences in platelet engraftment irrespective of stem cell source. We observed a modest but not significantly lower incidence of grades II/IV acute GVHD in the bidirectional ABO mismatched transplants in the UCB and the PBSC cohorts but not in the BM group. We found a higher incidence of chronic GVHD in the PBSC group, but it was not significantly lower in the minor ABO mismatched transplants. The incidence of chronic GVHD was similar in the major ABO mismatched transplants receiving BM. We found no significant difference in the OS and NRM between ABO matched and ABO mismatched transplants within each of the 3 graft source groups. Multivariable analysis adjusting for other relevant factors confirmed that ABO match status did not significantly influence the outcomes of either engraftment, acute or chronic GVHD or NRM. We conclude that ABO mismatch does not influence the outcomes of allogeneic HCT, regardless of stem cell source.

ABO blood group antigen mismatch has an impact on outcome after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

ABO blood group antigen incompatibility (ABO mismatch) is not an obstacle to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). However, the impact on clinical outcome after allo-SCT remains controversial. We analyzed 512 patients after allogeneic peripheral blood SCT (allo-PBSCT) for an association of ABO mismatch with transfusion requirements, myeloid and platelet engraftment, the incidence of GvHD, relapse, transplant-related mortality (TRM), and overall survival (OS). A total of 260 patients underwent ABO-mismatched transplantation and the control group consisted of 252 patients with ABO-matched allo-PBSCT. We found a significant association between major-0 ABO mismatch (group 0 recipient/group A, B, or AB donor) and increased red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusion requirements (both P<.001) as well as delayed platelet engraftment (P<.001). Minor-A (group A recipient/group 0 donor) and minor-AB (group AB recipient/group 0, A, or B donor) ABO mismatch was significantly associated with an increased TRM after allo-PBSCT (P=.001 and P=.02). In multivariate analysis performed using Cox regression, minor ABO mismatch appeared as independent risk factor for TRM after allo-PBSCT. No association was found for ABO mismatch with the incidence of GvHD, relapse, and OS. Our results suggest that ABO blood group mismatch has a significant impact on the outcome and that minor-A and minor-AB ABO mismatch represents a risk factor for increased TRM after allo-PBSCT.

YKL-40 in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation after AML and myelodysplastic syndrome

YKL-40, also called chitinase-3-like-1 protein, is an inflammatory biomarker that has been associated with disease severity in inflammatory and malignant diseases, including AML, multiple myeloma and lymphomas. The objective of the current study was to assess the prognostic value of pretransplant recipient and donor plasma YKL-40 concentrations in patients with AML (n=624) or myelodysplastic syndrome (n=157) treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In recipients, the plasma YKL-40 concentrations were increased when the HCT-comorbidity index was ⩾5 (P=0.028). There were no significant associations between plasma YKL-40 concentrations in recipients and any outcome measures. In donors with YKL-40 plasma concentrations above the age-adjusted 95th percentile, a trend toward increased grade II-IV acute GvHD in recipients was observed (adjusted hazard ratio 1.39 (95% confidence interval 1.00-1.94), P=0.050), with no significant associations with overall survival, treatment-related mortality or relapse. In conclusion, our study shows that YKL-40 does not aid risk stratification of patients undergoing allogeneic HCT, but suggests that YKL-40 may aid donor selection when multiple, otherwise equal, donors are available.

ABO blood group incompatibility as an adverse risk factor for outcomes in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia undergoing HLA-matched peripheral blood hematopoietic cell transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning

BACKGROUND

ABO incompatibility is not a contraindication to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but it has been associated with additional risks including delayed engraftment, pure red cell aplasia (PRCA), and higher transfusion needs. Data on these events and on patient survival after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) HCT are limited.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 127 consecutive patients, 86 with acute myeloid leukemia and 41 with myelodysplastic syndromes, who underwent HLA-matched peripheral blood RIC allogenic HCT between 2005 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighty ABO-compatible, 26 major/bidirectional, and 21 minor-ABO-mismatch HCT were identified. Compared to the ABO-compatible group, major/bidirectional mismatches had increased red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirement during the first 100 days (p = 0.009), delayed RBC and PLT engraftment (p = 0.0011 and p = 0.005, respectively), and higher incidence of grade II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD; p = 0.037). In multivariable analysis, major/bidirectional mismatches had significantly higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) and inferior disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with ABO-compatible patients (p = 0.01, p = 0.04, and p = 0.035, respectively). Minor ABO mismatch had no impact on survival (p = 0.99). Four (15%) of 26 major/bidirectional mismatches developed PRCA. There was a significant association between fludarabine plus busulfan conditioning and PRCA (p = 0.0046).

CONCLUSION

Major/bidirectional ABO mismatch is associated with higher NRM and shortened DFS and OS in the setting of RIC HCT. Increased transfusion need, delayed RBC and platelet engraftment, PRCA, and increased severity of aGVHD are additional complications contributing to the morbidity.

Allogeneic HY antibodies detected 3 months after female-to-male HCT predict chronic GVHD and nonrelapse mortality in humans

Allogeneic antibodies against minor histocompatibility antigens encoded on the Y chromosome (HY-Abs) develop after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) of male recipients with female donors (F→M). However, the temporal association between HY-Ab development and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) has yet to be elucidated. We studied 136 adult F→M HCT patients, with plasma prospectively collected through 3 years posttransplant, and measured immunoglobulin G against 6 H-Y antigens. Multiple HY-Abs were frequently detected beginning at 3 months posttransplant: 78 (57%) of F→M patients were seropositive for at least 1 of the 6 HY-Abs, and 3-month seropositivity for each HY-Ab was associated with a persistent seropositive response throughout the posttransplant follow-up period (P < .001 in each). There were no associations between pretransplant features and 3-month overall HY-Ab development. Detection of multiple HY-Abs at 3 months (represented by HY score) was significantly associated with an increased risk of cGVHD (P < .0001) and nonrelapse mortality (P < .01). Compared to clinical factors alone, the addition of HY score to clinical factors improved the predictive potential of cGVHD (P < .01). Monitoring HY-Ab development thus stratifies cGVHD risk in F→M HCT patients and may support preemptive prophylaxis therapy for cGVHD beginning at 3 months posttransplant.