Atorvastatin for the Prophylaxis of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Patients Undergoing HLA-Matched Related Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-HCT)

Impact of Donor Statin Treatment on Graft-versus-Host Disease after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Some retrospective studies have suggested that long-term donor statin use may protect against graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients receiving cyclosporine (CSP)-based immunosuppression after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but prospective studies of short-term treatment of donors with statin have shown conflicting results. We conducted 2 consecutive prospective clinical trials to assess whether donor statin treatment was associated with protection against severe acute GVHD (aGVHD). In a single-arm phase II trial (study 1), we evaluated whether short-term statin treatment of HLA-matched related donors for 14 days before HCT prevented grade III-IV aGVHD. In a prospective observational cohort study (study 2), we evaluated whether longer-term (>14 days) donor statin use was required for GVHD-protective effects. Study 1 was terminated after 6 of the 35 recipients (17%) developed grade III-IV GVHD. For study 2, we identified 135 patients whose unrelated donors had received long-term treatment with statins up to the time of HCT and 4942 patients whose donors had not received long-term statin treatment. The adjusted odds ratio for grade III-IV aGVHD (statin versus no statin) was .83 (95% confidence interval [CI], .46 to 1.50; P = .54). Multivariable analysis showed no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in the risk of grade II-IV aGVHD, chronic GVHD, nonrelapse mortality, recurrent malignancy, or overall mortality. Among patients receiving CSP-based immunosuppression, including 35 with donors receiving long-term statin treatment and 973 with donors who did not receive statins, the adjusted odds ratio of grade III-IV aGVHD was .30 (95% CI, .07 to 1.35; P = .12). In study 1, short-term statin treatment of donors was ineffective in preventing grade III-IV GVHD. In study 2, in the prespecified subgroup of recipients given CSP-based immunosuppression, nondefinitive evidence suggested that donor statin use was associated with a reduced risk of severe aGVHD.

From support to therapy: rethinking the role of nutrition in acute graft-versus-host disease

Allogeneic Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers a potential cure for patients with hematologic malignancies. Unfortunately, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major obstacle to the greater success of this treatment. Despite intensive research efforts over the past several decades, GVHD is still a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients receiving allogeneic HSCT. The genetic disparity between donor and recipient is the primary factor that dictates the extent of alloimmune response and the severity of acute GVHD (aGVHD). However, some nongenetic factors are also actively involved in GVHD pathogenesis. Thus, identifying host factors that can be readily modified to reduce GVHD risk is of important clinical significance. We are particularly interested in the potential role of nutrition, as a nongenetic factor, in the etiology and management of aGVHD. In this article, we summarize recent findings regarding how different routes of nutritional support and various dietary factors affect aGVHD. Since diet is one of the most important factors that shape gut microbiota, we also provide evidence for a potential link between certain nutrients and gut microbiota in recipients of allogeneic HSCT. We propose a shifting role of nutrition from support to therapy in GVHD by targeting gut microbiota.

Statin-based endothelial prophylaxis and outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) often remains the only curative therapy for hematologic malignancies. Although the management of transplant-associated adverse events considerably improved over the last decades, nonrelapse mortality (NRM) remains a challenge, and endothelial dysfunction was identified as a major contributor to NRM.

METHODS

Statin-based endothelial prophylaxis (SEP) has been implemented in the standard of care in our transplant centre to reduce NRM caused by endothelial injury. Here, we retrospectively analysed the impact of SEP on clinical outcome in a cohort of 347 alloSCT patients.

RESULTS

SEP (n = 209) was associated with significantly reduced NRM (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.38-0.96) and better overall survival (OS) after acute graft-versus-host disease (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.93). Subgroup analyses showed that the NRM benefit was mainly found in patients with an intermediate endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX), while relapse risk was not affected. On day 100 post-alloSCT, patients receiving SEP had significantly higher levels of the rate-limiting enzyme of tryptophan metabolism, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), higher kynurenine to tryptophan ratios as a proxy of IDO activity and tended to have lower levels of the endothelial injury marker ST2 (p = .055). No significant differences in interferon-gamma or IL18 levels were observed. These biomarker signatures suggest that the beneficial effects of SEP might be mediated by both endothelial protection and immunomodulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, these data suggest that SEP improves NRM and OS post-alloSCT in particular in patients with intermediate endothelial risk and provide first mechanistic clues about its potential mode of action.

Longitudinal Survival Outcomes in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: An Institutional Experience

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a potentially curative treatment for many hematological disorders, but is often complicated by relapse of the underlying disease, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and infectious complications. We conducted a retrospective analysis on patients undergoing allo-SCT from 1984 to 2018 to better understand how survival has changed longitudinally with therapeutic advancements made to mitigate these complications. Method: We analyzed data from 1943 consecutive patients who received allo-SCT. Patients were divided into groups (gps) based on the year (yr) of transplant. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS). Secondary endpoints were the cumulative incidences of grade II−IV and grade III−IV acute GVHD (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Results: Our study found statistically significant improvements in OS, PFS, and GRFS. Five-year PFS among the groups increased from 24% to 48% over the years. Five-year OS increased from 25% to 53%. Five-year GRFS significantly increased from 6% to 14%, but remained relatively unchanged from 2004 to 2018. Cumulative incidences of grade II−IV aGVHD increased since 2009 (p < 0.001). However, cumulative incidence of NRM decreased since 2004 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our data show improved OS, PFS, and GRFS post allo-SCT over decades. This may be attributed to advances in supportive care and treatments focused on mitigation of GVHD and relapse.

Management of dyslipidemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Dyslipidemia is one of the complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), and it is often underestimated and undertreated. Dyslipidemia in allo-HSCT recipients has been confirmed to be associated with endocrine dysfunction, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD and cGVHD), immunosuppressive agent application, etc. However, few studies have illustrated the accurate molecular signaling pathways involved in dyslipidemia, and there are no standard guidelines for dyslipidemia management after HSCT. This review will discuss the pathogenesis of dyslipidemia, especially the association with aGVHD and/or cGVHD. Comprehensive treatment methods for dyslipidemia after HSCT will also be summarized.

Putting function back in dysfunction: Endothelial diseases and current therapies in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and cellular therapies

Endothelial dysfunction is characterized by altered vascular permeability and prothrombotic, pro-inflammatory phenotypes. Endothelial dysfunction results in end-organ damage and has been associated with diverse disease pathologies. Complications observed after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) and chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CAR-T) therapy for hematologic and neoplastic disorders share overlapping clinical manifestations and there is increasing evidence linking these complications to endothelial dysfunction. Despite advances in supportive care and treatments, end-organ toxicity remains the leading cause of mortality. A new strategy to mitigate endothelial dysfunction could lead to improvement of clinical outcomes for patients. Statins have demonstrated pleiotropic effects of immunomodulatory and endothelial protection by various molecular mechanisms. Recent applications in immune-mediated diseases such as autoimmune disorders, chronic inflammatory conditions, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) have shown promising results. In this review, we cover the mechanisms underlying endothelial dysfunction in GVHD and CAR-T cell-related toxicities. We summarize the current knowledge about statins and other agents used as endothelial protectants. We propose further studies using statins for prophylaxis and prevention of end-organ damage related to extensive endothelial dysfunction in HCT and CAR-T.

Current approaches to prevent and treat GVHD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a potentially curative therapy for many malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication after transplantation and remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, limiting the success of a potentially curative transplant. This paper reviews the current and emerging strategies in GVHD prevention and treatment. New insights are leading the way to the development of novel targeted approaches to minimize the risk of disease relapse and infection. Continued collaborative efforts to conduct high-quality, multicenter clinical trials with standard end points and risk stratification are needed to determine the optimal approach to minimize GVHD and limit toxicities.

Immune modulatory effects of statins

Despite major advances in recent years, immunosuppressive regimens for multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and graft-versus-host disease still have major adverse effects and immunomodulation rather than immune paralysis would be desirable. Statins inhibit the rate-limiting enzyme of the l-mevalonate pathway, the 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase. It was shown that blocking the l-mevalonate pathway reduces inflammation through effects on downstream metabolites of the pathway including farnesylpyrophosphates and geranylgeranylpyrophosphates, which are essential for the attachment of GTPases like RhoA, Rac and Ras to the cell membrane. Therefore, l-mevalonate pathway downstream products play critical roles in the different steps of an immune response including immune cell activation, migration, cytokine production, immune metabolism and survival. This review discusses the relevance of the different metabolites for the immunomodulatory effect of statins and connects preclinical results with data from clinical studies that tested statins for the treatment of different inflammatory diseases.

Recipient Immune Modulation with Atorvastatin for Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis after Allogeneic Transplantation

Atorvastatin administration to both the donors and recipients of matched related donor (MRD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) as acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has been shown to be safe and effective. However, its efficacy as acute GVHD prophylaxis when given only to allo-HCT recipients is unknown. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of atorvastatin-based acute GVHD prophylaxis given only to the recipients of MRD (n = 30) or matched unrelated donor (MUD) (n = 39) allo-HCT, enrolled in 2 separate cohorts. Atorvastatin (40 mg/day) was administered along with standard GVHD prophylaxis consisting of tacrolimus and methotrexate. All patients were evaluable for acute GVHD. The cumulative incidences of grade II to IV acute GVHD at day +100 in the MRD and MUD cohorts were 9.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0 to 20%) and 29.6% (95% CI,15.6% to 43.6%), respectively. The cumulative incidences of grade III and IV acute GVHD at day +100 in the MRD and MUD cohorts were 3.4% (95% CI, 0 to 9.7%) and 18.3% (95% CI, 6.3% to 30.4%), respectively. The corresponding rates of moderate/severe chronic GVHD at 1 year were 28.1% (95% CI, 11% to 45.2%) and 38.9% (95% CI, 20.9% to 57%), respectively. In the MRD cohort, the 1-year nonrelapse mortality, relapse rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 6.7% (95% CI, 0 to 15.4%), 43.3% (95% CI, 24.9% to 61.7%), 50% (95% CI, 32.1% to 67.9%), and 66.7% (95% CI, 49.8% to 83.6%), respectively. The respective figures for the MUD cohort were 10.3% (95% CI, 8% to 19.7%), 20.5% (95% CI, 7.9% to 33.1%), 69.2% (95% CI, 54.7% to 83.7%), and 79.5% (95% CI, 66.8% to 92.2%), respectively. No grade 4 toxicities attributable to atorvastatin were seen. In conclusion, the addition of atorvastatin to standard GVHD prophylaxis in only the recipients of MRD and MUD allo-HCT appears to be feasible and safe. The preliminary efficacy seen here warrants confirmation in randomized trials.

Pathogenesis of acute graft-versus-host disease: from intestinal microbiota alterations to donor T cell activation

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a major life-threatening complication of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Here we discuss the aGVHD pathophysiology initiated by multiple signals that cause alloreactive T-cell activation. The outcome of such donor T-cell activation is influenced by T-cell receptor-signal strength, anatomical location, co-stimulatory/co-inhibitory signals and differentiation stage (naive, effector/memory) of T-cells. Additionally, cross-priming of T cells to antigens expressed by pathogens can contribute to aGVHD-mediated tissue injury. In addition to the properties of donor T-cell activation, highly specialized tissue resident cell types, such as innate lymphoid cells, antigen-presenting cells, immune regulatory cells and various intestinal cell populations are critically involved in aGVHD pathogenesis. The role of the thymus and secondary lymphoid tissue injury, non-haematopoietic cells, intestinal microflora, cytokines, chemokines, microRNAs, metabolites and kinases in aGVHD pathophysiology will be highlighted. Acute GVHD pathogenic mechanisms will be connected to novel therapeutic approaches under development for, and tested in, the clinic.

Preclinical models of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease: how predictive are they for a successful clinical translation?

Despite major advances in recent years, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major life-threatening complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). To improve our therapeutic armory against GVHD, preclinical evidence is most frequently generated in mouse and large animal models of GVHD. However, because every model has shortcomings, it is important to understand how predictive the different models are and why certain findings in these models could not be translated into the clinic. Weaknesses of the animal GVHD models include the irradiation only-based conditioning regimen, the homogenous donor/recipient genetics in mice, canine or non-human primates (NHP), anatomic site of T cells used for transfer in mice, the homogenous microbial environment in mice housed under specific pathogen-free conditions, and the lack of pharmacologic GVHD prevention in control groups. Despite these major differences toward clinical allo-HCT, findings generated in animal models of GVHD have led to the current gold standards for GVHD prophylaxis and therapy. The homogenous nature of the preclinical models allows for reproducibility, which is key for the characterization of the role of a new cytokine, chemokine, transcription factor, microRNA, kinase, or immune cell population in the context of GVHD. Therefore, when carefully balancing reasons to apply small and large animal models, it becomes evident that they are valuable tools to generate preclinical hypotheses, which then have to be rigorously evaluated in the clinical setting. In this study, we discuss several clinical approaches that were motivated by preclinical evidence, novel NHP models and their advantages, and highlight the recent advances in understanding the pathophysiology of GVHD.