Comparison of Outcomes after Peripheral Blood Haploidentical versus Matched Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective Single-Center Review

Characterization of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease After Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation With Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide: A Study on Behalf of GETH-TC

BACKGROUND

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a cause of late morbidity and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Although studies evaluating haploidentical allo-HSCT (haplo-HSCT) using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) demonstrate lower cGVHD rates, comprehensive data describing the clinical profile, risk factors, or outcomes of cGVHD within this platform are scarce.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of 389 consecutive patients who underwent haplo-HSCT PTCy in 7 transplant centers of the Spanish Group Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyético y Terapia Celular (GETH-TC) between 2008 and 2020 describing incidence, clinical profile, risk factors, and cGVHD outcomes.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients of 389 developed cGVHD. Our data revealed that the incidence and severity of cGVHD are lower than those reported for HLA-identical transplantation with conventional prophylaxis and that the strongest predictor for cGVHD was previous acute GVHD (P = 0.031). Also, recipient age ≥60 y (P = 0.044) was protective against cGVHD. Moreover, patients with moderate cGVHD had longer event-free survival at 3 y than other patients (P = 0.016) and a lower relapse rate at 3 y (P = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the fact that the incidence and severity of cGVHD are lower than those reported for HLA-identical transplantation with conventional prophylaxis. In this series, patients who develop moderate cGVHD after haplo-HSCT PTCy had a higher overall survival and event-free survival, and lower relapse, suggesting higher graft-versus-leukemia effect. Although this is the largest series focused on characterizing cGVHD in haplo-HSCT PTCy, further prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings.

Impact of CD34 positive cell dose in donor graft on the outcomes after haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide - A retrospective single-center study with a Japanese cohort

BACKGROUND

Haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is an important therapeutic option for patients lacking an HLA-matched donor. However, the significance of CD34+ cell dose in grafts has not been fully elucidated.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore the impact of CD34+ cell dose on outcomes after haplo-PBSCT with PTCy.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively investigated 111 consecutive patients who underwent haplo-PBSCT with PTCy or HLA-matched PBSCT from related donors.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in 3-year overall survival (p = 0.559) or progression-free survival (p = 0.974) between haplo-PBSCT and matched PBSCT. Delayed neutrophil engraftment and a lower incidence of graft-versus-host disease were observed in haplo-PBSCT. The median dose of CD34+ cells was 4.9 × 106 /kg in 57 haplo-PBSCT and 4.5 × 106 /kg in 54 matched PBSCTs. Importantly, patients who underwent haplo-PBSCT with the administration of CD34+ cell at a dose of ≥4.0 × 106 /kg significantly had improved OS (p = 0.015) and decreased incidence of disease relapse (p = 0.001) without increasing incidence of GVHD.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that a higher dose of CD34+ cells in haplo-PBSCT with PTCy positively impacts the outcomes without an increase of GVHD.

Peripheral Blood Haploidentical Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Older Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes Demonstrates Long Term Survival, Results from Australia and New Zealand Transplant and Cellular Therapies

There is a limited body of evidence for haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) in older patients. Previous studies have used a high proportion of bone marrow-derived grafts and a variety of conditioning regimens. In Australia and New Zealand, haplo-HCST is predominantly performed using peripheral blood (PB) with universal use of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy). To characterize the outcomes of older recipients undergoing haplo-HSCT for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Data were collected through the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry (ABMTRR) for patients aged 65 or older receiving a PB haplo-HSCT for AML/MDS between January 2010 and July 2020. A total of 44 patients were included in the analysis. The median follow-up time was 377 days. The median age was 68 (range 65-74) with a median Karnofsky performance status of 90. Thirty patients (68.2%) had AML, whereas 14 (31.8%) had MDS. The median donor age was 40. The most common conditioning regimen was nonmyeloablative fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation (75%); the remainder of the patients received either melphalan- or busulfan-based regimens, and the majority were reduced intensity, with only 2 patients undergoing myeloablative conditioning. All patients received post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil, with the majority also receiving tacrolimus (90.5%) and the remainder receiving cyclosporine (9.5%). No patients received anti-thymocyte globulin. Neutrophil engraftment was achieved in 97.6% of patients at a median of 18 days, whereas platelet engraftment was achieved in 92.7% of patients at a median of 28 days. The cumulative incidences of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and CMV disease were 52.5% and 5.1% at 1 year. The incidence of grade 2-4 acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) was 18.2%. The incidence of chronic GVHD at 2 years was 40.7%, with extensive chronic GVHD occurring in 17.7% of patients. The incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 2 years were 8.8% and 20.7% respectively. The leading causes of death were infection (64.7%) followed by relapse (14.2%). The 2-year overall survival was 74%. Relapse free survival and GVHD free, relapse free survival at 2 years was 70% and 48%. Haplo-HSCT using a peripheral blood graft and PTCy GVHD prophylaxis demonstrates long-term disease control with acceptable rates of NRM for older patients with AML/MDS.

Phase I-II Trial of Early Azacitidine after Matched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). The hypomethylating agent azacitidine (AZA) has been shown to be effective in preclinical and clinical studies for the prevention of acute GVHD (aGVHD). We sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AZA when given on days 1 to 5 of a 28-day cycle for 4 cycles, starting on day +7 after allo-HCT, as well as its impact on aGVHD and chronic GVHD (cGVHD), relapse, and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing matched unrelated donor allo-HCT. This study was a single-arm, single-center, open-label phase I-II study with a total of 15 and 38 patients enrolled in the phase I and II portions of the trial, respectively. A standard 3+3 study design was used in phase I, and all patients in phase II received AZA at the MTD determined in phase I. The MTD of AZA starting at day +7 post-transplantation was 45 mg/m2. Phase II of the study was halted after enrolling 38 of the planned 46 patients following an interim analysis that suggested futility. Overall, AZA at 45 mg/m2 exhibited a side effect profile consistent with prior reports and had a minimal impact on engraftment. The cumulative incidence of clinically significant aGVHD by day +180 was 39.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22% to 53.7%). The incidence of all-grade cGVHD was 61.4% (95% CI, 40.3% to 75%). At 1 year, OS was 73.7% (95% CI, 60.9% to 89.1%), and the disease relapse rate was 11.4% (95% CI, .2% to 21.3%). Our results suggest that early post-allo-HCT AZA has limited efficacy in preventing aGVHD and cGVHD but could have a beneficial effect in preventing disease relapse.

Outcomes of haploidentical peripheral stem cell transplantation with combination of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) compared to unrelated donor transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: A retrospective 10-year experience

In the evolution of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT), In vivo T-cell modulation with concomitant use of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) provides a novel promising method on transplant outcomes; however, the long-term effects of this therapy are mostly unknown. We retrospectively compared the long-term outcomes of adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients undergoing a haplo-HSCT (n = 92) with a new modified combination of ATG and PTCy in the context of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) and myeloablative conditioning (MAC) with an otherwise similar group of AML patients who received an unrelated donor (URD) HSCT (n = 57) with ATG protocol from February 2010 to December 2020 at our single-center (HORCSCT). Median follow-up was 3.73 and 4.28 years for haploidentical and URD-HSCT, respectively. In haplo-HSCT, the cumulative incidence of grades II-IV and III-IV acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) and extensive chronic GvHD (cGvHD) was much lower than in URD (27% versus 56% for grades II-IV, 8.7% versus 24.5% for grades III-IV, and 15.4% versus 34.7% for extensive cGvHD, respectively). Five-year overall survival (OS) was 54.03% for haplo and 54.48% for URD (p = 0.927); GvHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 44.1% and 29.86% (p = 0.149); relapse incidence was 15.79% and 26.95% (p = 0.72); and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 29.48% and 26.32% (p = 0.73), respectively. Using multivariable analyses, when compared to Haplo, URD was a significant predictor of relapse (HR=1.80, p = 0.039); however, no difference in OS, GRFS, and NRM was noted between haplo and URD. Therefore, given the favorable results with haplo-HSCT and considering donor availability promptly with low cost, it conservatively suggested that haplo-HSCT with the introduced protocol could be viewed as the first alternative for patients with AML in the absence of matched sibling donors.

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation vs matched unrelated donor transplantation in adults with hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) and matched unrelated donor transplantation (MUD-SCT) are two important options when a matched sibling donor (MSD) is unavailable. Several studies comparing Haplo-SCT and MUD-SCT have reported inconsistent clinical outcomes. Therefore, it is necessary to synthesize the existing evidence regarding outcomes of stem cell transplantations comparing Haplo-SCT with MUD-SCT.

METHODS

We searched for titles of articles in MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane library, EMBASE database that compared transplantation with Haplo-SCT versus MUD-SCT. To compare clinical outcomes between Haplo-SCT and MUD-SCT, we performed a meta-analysis of 17 studies and reported the pooled odd ratios (OR) of 6 endpoints including overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse rate (RR), acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and chronic graft- versus-host disease (cGVHD).

RESULTS

We found that Haplo-SCT was associated with a comparable OS (pooled OR of 0.99, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.86-1.14), PFS (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.88-1.15), NRM (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.65-1.04) and RR (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.95-1.22) compared to MUD-SCT. We also found a significantly decreased risk of aGVHD (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.88) and cGVHD (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.66) in Haplo-SCT group.

CONCLUSION

Results of this meta-analysis demonstrates that Haplo-SCT achieves comparable clinical outcomes compared to MUD-SCT in terms of OS, PFS, TRM and RR, but is better than MUD-SCT in terms of decreased aGVHD and cGVHD risk. Haplo-SCT is a valid option for patient needing urgent transplantation.

Comparative Efficacy and Clinical Outcomes of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation to Other Stem Sources for Treatment in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is recommended during the first complete remission of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, only 30% of these cases have fully matched sibling donors (MSDs). Alternatively, matched unrelated donors (MUDs) and haploidentical (haplo) donors from first-degree relatives increase the access to transplantation, with some reported differences in outcomes. The current systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim of summarizing the results of those studies to compare the efficacy and toxicity of MSD-HSCT and MUD-HSCT versus haplo-HSCT for patients with AML or MDS. Articles published before September 15, 2018, were individually searched for in two databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) by two investigators. The effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each eligible study were combined using the Mantel–Haenszel method. A total of 14 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The overall survival rates were not significantly different between the groups, with pooled odds ratios of the chance of surviving at the end of the study when comparing haplo-HSCT to MSD-HSCT and comparing haplo-HSCT to MUD-HSCT of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.70 to 1.04; I² = 0%) and 1.12 (95% CI: 0.89 to 1.41; I² = 33%), respectively. The pooled analyses of other outcomes also showed comparable results, except for the higher grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) for patients who received haplo-HSCT than those who received MSD-HSCT, and the better GvHD-free, relapse-free survival and the lower chronic GvHD than the patients in the MUD-HSCT group. These observations suggest that haplo-HSCT is a reasonable alternative with comparable efficacy if MSD-HSCT and MUD-HSCT cannot be performed. Nonetheless, the primary studies included in this meta-analysis were observational in nature, and randomized-controlled trials are still needed to confirm the efficacy of haplo-HSCT.

Panobinostat and decitabine prior to donor lymphocyte infusion in allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is adversely affected by relapse to a considerable degree. To exploit the graft-versus-leukemia effect more effectively, we assessed the feasibility of early initiation of epigenetic therapy with panobinostat and decitabine after allo-HSCT and before donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in poor-risk patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or refractory anemia with excess blasts with International Prognostic Scoring System score ≥1.5. A total of 140 poor-risk patients with AML aged 18 to 70 years were registered, and 110 proceeded to allo-HSCT. Three dose levels were evaluated for dose-limiting toxicities, including panobinostat monotherapy 20 mg at days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 4-week cycle (PNB mono group) and panobinostat combined with either decitabine 20 mg/m2 (PNB/DAC20 group) or decitabine 10 mg/m2 (PNB/DAC10 group) at days 1 to 3 of every 4-week cycle. After phase 1, the study continued as phase 2, focusing on completion of protocol treatment and treatment outcome. PNB mono and PNB/DAC10 were feasible, whereas PNB/DAC20 was not related to prolonged cytopenia. Sixty of 110 patients who underwent transplantation were eligible to receive their first DLI within 115 days after allo-HSCT. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events related to panobinostat and decitabine were observed in 23 (26%) of the 87 patients, and they received epigenetic therapy. Cumulative incidence of relapse was 35% (standard error [SE] 5), and overall survival and progression-free survival at 24 months were 50% (SE 5) and 49% (SE 5). Post-allo-HSCT epigenetic therapy with panobinostat alone or in combination with low-dose decitabine is feasible and is associated with a relatively low relapse rate. The trial was registered at the European Clinical Trial Registry, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu, as ECT2012-003344-74.

Considerations for haploidentical versus unrelated donor transplants

Haploidentical transplantation is increasingly performed worldwide due to novel methods to control alloreactivity between the donor and recipient. This major advancement has increased donor availability to almost all patients in need. Outcomes with haploidenitcal donors have also improved and prompted many groups to compare outcomes between haploidentical and HLA-matched donor transplants. In this review, we provide a summary of available data on haploidentical transplants performed with post transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and HLA-matched unrelated donor transplants.

Outcomes of haploidentical vs matched sibling transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission

HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (Haplo-HCT) using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) has improved donor availability. However, a matched sibling donor (MSD) is still considered the optimal donor. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we compared outcomes after Haplo-HCT vs MSD in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). Data from 1205 adult CR1 AML patients (2008-2015) were analyzed. A total of 336 patients underwent PT-Cy-based Haplo-HCT and 869 underwent MSD using calcineurin inhibitor-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The Haplo-HCT group included more reduced-intensity conditioning (65% vs 30%) and bone marrow grafts (62% vs 7%), consistent with current practice. In multivariable analysis, Haplo-HCT and MSD groups were not different with regard to overall survival (P = .15), leukemia-free survival (P = .50), nonrelapse mortality (P = .16), relapse (P = .90), or grade II-IV acute GVHD (P = .98). However, the Haplo-HCT group had a significantly lower rate of chronic GVHD (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.48; P < .001). Results of subgroup analyses by conditioning intensity and graft source suggested that the reduced incidence of chronic GVHD in Haplo-HCT is not limited to a specific graft source or conditioning intensity. Center effect and minimal residual disease-donor type interaction were not predictors of outcome. Our results indicate a lower rate of chronic GVHD after PT-Cy-based Haplo-HCT vs MSD using calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis, but similar other outcomes, in patients with AML in CR1. Haplo-HCT is a viable alternative to MSD in these patients.

Natural Killer Cells Expanded and Preactivated Exhibit Enhanced Antitumor Activity against Different Tumor Cells in Vitro

One of the emerging treatment strategies for cancer particularly for haematological malignancies is natural killer (NK) cell therapy. However, the availability of a best approach to maximize NK cell anticancer potential is still awaited. It is well established that cytokine-induced memory-like NK cells have the potential to differentiate after a short period of preactivation with interleukins-IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18 and exhibit increased responses to cytokine or activating receptor restimulation for weeks to months after preactivation. We demonstrated that NK cells differentiated from CD34+ cells isolated from cord blood show increased antitumor potential in vitro against different cancer cells. Using flow cytometry, we found that NK cells were able to induce apoptosis in cancer cells in vitro. We further analysed surviving gene expression by quantitative real time PCR and reported that NK cells cause down regulation of survivin gene expression in tumor cells. Therefore, NK cell therapy represents a promising immunotherapy for cancers like AML and other haematological malignancies. It concluded that NK cells can be differentiated from CD34+ cells isolated from cord blood ,are able to induce apoptosis and induce increased antitumor potential in vitro against different cancer cells besides cause downregulation of survivin gene expression in tumor cells. Therefore, NK cell therapy represents a promising immunotherapy for different cancer types and haematological malignancies. Furthers studies are necessary to confirm our findings.

Risk Factors for Graft-versus-Host Disease in Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has significantly increased the successful use of haploidentical donors with a relatively low incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Given its increasing use, we sought to determine risk factors for GVHD after haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) using PTCy. Data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research on adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or chronic myeloid leukemia who underwent PTCy-based haplo-HCT (2013 to 2016) were analyzed and categorized into 4 groups based on myeloablative (MA) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB) graft source. In total, 646 patients were identified (MA-BM = 79, MA-PB = 183, RIC-BM = 192, RIC-PB = 192). The incidence of grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD at 6 months was highest in MA-PB (44%), followed by RIC-PB (36%), MA-BM (36%), and RIC-BM (30%) (P = .002). The incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year was 40%, 34%, 24%, and 20%, respectively (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, there was no impact of stem cell source or conditioning regimen on grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD; however, older donor age (30 to 49 versus <29 years) was significantly associated with higher rates of grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 2.12; P = .01). In contrast, PB compared to BM as a stem cell source was a significant risk factor for the development of chronic GVHD (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.62; P = .01) in the RIC setting. There were no differences in relapse or overall survival between groups. Donor age and graft source are risk factors for acute and chronic GVHD, respectively, after PTCy-based haplo-HCT. Our results indicate that in RIC haplo-HCT, the risk of chronic GVHD is higher with PB stem cells, without any difference in relapse or overall survival.

The Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA Epitopes (PIRCHE) Score for HLA Class I Graft-versus-Host Disparity Is Associated with Increased Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Haploidentical Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide

The Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA Epitopes (PIRCHE) score quantifies the number of PIRCHEs in patient-donor pairs and represents an in silico measure of indirect alloreactivity. This biologic process is defined as T cell recognition of epitopes derived from mismatched, allogeneic HLA peptides that are subsequently presented by shared HLA molecules. Its association with clinical outcome has not been examined in haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We hypothesized that the PIRCHE score (PS) would correlate with indirect alloreactivity and predict graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) risk and the incidence of relapse after haplo-HCT with PTCy. We retrospectively analyzed 148 patients who underwent peripheral blood stem cell T cell-replete haplo-HCT with PTCy at a single center between 2009 and 2016. For each patient-donor pair, the PS was calculated using the PIRCHE online matching tool. PSs were categorized by class and vector. The median class I graft-versus-host (GVH) PS was 11 (range, 0 to 56), and the median class I host-versus-graft (HVG) PS was 10 (range, 0 to 51). Class I GVH PS was associated with increased risk of grade II-IV acute GVHD (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.03 per PS unit increase; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.05; P= .008) but not of chronic GVHD or relapse. Our data show that use of the PS is a novel strategy for predicting clinical outcome in haplo-HCT; further studies using registry data and prospective cohorts are warranted to validate these findings.

How we perform haploidentical stem cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide

HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is now one of the most commonly employed alternative donor techniques, with most centers applying T-cell-replete strategies such as that developed by the Baltimore group using high-dose posttransplant cyclophosphamide. HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using posttransplant cyclophosphamide is associated with low rates of severe graft-versus-host disease and nonrelapse mortality and does not require graft manipulation or storage, which results in a low graft acquisition cost. Its remarkable safety when used with reduced-intensity conditioning has been demonstrated in patients up to 75 years old with outcomes similar to those of patients in their 50s. Several large, registry-based retrospective studies have confirmed the efficacy of HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide, achieving results comparable to those of HLA-matched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In this article, we describe our approach to this rapidly available and clinically simple platform and address some of the key clinical questions associated with its use.

Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation With Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide Therapy vs Other Donor Transplantations in Adults With Hematologic Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Use of haploidentical (HAPLO) stem cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide is rapidly increasing in adults with hematologic cancers. However, its specific role compared with other transplant strategies has yet to be identified.

Objective

To synthesize the existing evidence regarding outcomes of stem cell transplantations comparing HAPLO stem cell transplantation and posttransplant cyclophosphamide therapy with transplantations from matched related donors (MRDs), matched unrelated donors (MUDs), or mismatched unrelated donors (MMUDs).

Data Sources

PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and meeting abstracts were searched for the key words haploidentical and cyclophosphamide from inception through March 1, 2019.

Study Selection

Studies comparing HAPLO stem cell transplantation and posttransplant cyclophosphamide therapy with transplantations from other donors in adults with hematologic cancers were eligible for meta-analysis.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Main outcomes were all-cause mortality, nonrelapse mortality, and relapse.

Results

A total of 30 studies including 22 974 participants were analyzed. HAPLO stem cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide therapy was associated with increased all-cause mortality compared with MRDs (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05-1.30), similar all-cause mortality compared with MUDs (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.96-1.18), and reduced all-cause mortality compared with MMUDs (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92). Regarding nonrelapse mortality, HAPLO stem cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide was associated with worse outcomes compared with MRDs (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.40) but better outcomes compared with MUDs (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92) and MMUDs (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.25-1.02). In terms of relapse, HAPLO stem cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide was associated with similar outcome compared with MRDs (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.86-1.17) and MMUDs (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.77-1.47) but showed increased relapse compared with MUDs (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.03-1.40).

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this meta-analysis suggest that MRDs, if available, remain the optimal donors regarding mortality and HAPLO stem cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide may be preferred over MMUDs. Prospective comparisons with MUDs are needed.

How we perform haploidentical stem cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide

HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is now one of the most commonly employed alternative donor techniques, with most centers applying T-cell-replete strategies such as that developed by the Baltimore group using high-dose posttransplant cyclophosphamide. HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using posttransplant cyclophosphamide is associated with low rates of severe graft-versus-host disease and nonrelapse mortality and does not require graft manipulation or storage, which results in a low graft acquisition cost. Its remarkable safety when used with reduced-intensity conditioning has been demonstrated in patients up to 75 years old with outcomes similar to those of patients in their 50s. Several large, registry-based retrospective studies have confirmed the efficacy of HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide, achieving results comparable to those of HLA-matched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In this article, we describe our approach to this rapidly available and clinically simple platform and address some of the key clinical questions associated with its use.

Impact of CD34+ cell dose on reduced intensity conditioning regimen haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant (haplo-SCT) has been associated with higher rates of graft rejection, and a higher dose of CD34+ cell dose is frequently requested. We aim to explore the impact of CD34+ cell dose in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts using reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in haplo-SCT.

METHODS

Sixty-eight consecutive haplo-SCT in adult patients were included. Graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted on ATG, PTCy, and CsA. The cohort was divided in two groups using CD34+ dose of ≥ 9 × 10⁶ CD34+/Kg as cutoff point. Median follow-up was 8.9 months.

RESULTS

Median cell dose infused was 9.32 × 10⁶ CD34+/Kg. Forty (58.8%) recipients received grafts with CD34+ cells ≥9 × 10⁶ /kg. The infusion ≥ 9 × 10⁶ CD34+/Kg cell dose had a negative impact in overall survival (P = .03) after adjusting for age at transplant. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD and graft failure were not significantly influenced per CD34+ cell dose. Only four recipients had grade III aGVHD, and all of them received grafts with a CD34+ cell dose ≥ 9 × 10⁶ .

CONCLUSION

In RIC haplo-SCT, recipients may not benefit from PBSC grafts with a CD34+/kg cell dose higher than 9 × 10⁶ cells/kg, as it can have an adverse impact in post-transplant outcome.

HLA epitope mismatch in haploidentical transplantation is associated with decreased relapse and delayed engraftment

HLA disparity is traditionally measured at the antigen or allele level, and its impact on haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) with high-dose posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is unclear. To the best of our knowledge, the relationship between HLA eplet-derived epitope mismatch (EM) and clinical outcome has not been examined in haplo-HCT. We retrospectively analyzed 148 patients who received a peripheral blood, T-cell-replete haplo-HCT with PTCy at a single center. HLA EM was quantified using an HLAMatchmaker-based method and was stratified by class and vector. The primary outcome was incidence of relapse. The total number of mismatched epitopes (MEs) per patient-donor pair in our patient population ranged from 0 to 51 (median, 24) in the graft-versus-host (GVH) direction and 0 to 47 (median, 24) in the host-versus-graft (HVG) direction. Higher HLA class II EM in the GVH direction was associated with a significantly reduced risk of relapse (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.952 per ME; P = .002) and improved relapse-free survival (adjusted HR, 0.974 per ME; P = .020). Higher HLA class II EM in the HVG direction was associated with longer time to neutrophil (adjusted HR, 0.974 per ME; P = .013) and platelet (adjusted HR, 0.961 per ME; P = .001) engraftment. In peripheral blood haplo-HCT patients, increased HLA EM was associated with a protective effect on the risk of relapse in the GVH direction but a negative effect on time to count recovery in the HVG direction. HLA EM based on the HLA Matchmaker represents a novel strategy to predict clinical outcome in haplo-HCT.

Haploidentical versus unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a report on 1578 patients from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

Primary refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia is associated with a dismal prognosis. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is the only therapeutic option that offers prolonged survival and cure in this setting. In the absence of a matched sibling donor, transplantation from unrelated 10/10 HLA allele-matched or 9/10 HLA allele-mismatched donors and haploidentical donors are potential alternatives. The current study aimed to compare the outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia patients with active disease who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation from a haploidentical donor with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (n=199) versus an unrelated 10/10-matched donor (n=1111) and versus an unrelated 9/10-mismatched donor (n=383) between 2007 and 2014 and who were reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. Propensity score weighted analysis was conducted in order to control for disease risk imbalances between the groups. The leukemia-free survival rates at 2 years of recipients of grafts from a haploidentical donor, an unrelated 10/10-matched donor and an unrelated 9/10-mismatched donor were 22.8%, 28% and 22.2%, respectively (P=NS). In multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in leukemia-free survival, overall survival, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, or graft-versus-host-disease-free relapse-free survival between the three groups. Two predictive factors were associated with a higher relapse incidence: transplantation during first or second relapse compared to primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia and poor cytogenetics. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation may rescue about 25% of acute myeloid leukemia patients with active disease. Importantly, the outcomes of transplants from haploidentical donors were comparable to those from 10/10-matched and 9/10-mismatched unrelated donors. Therefore, a haploidentical donor is a valid option for acute myeloid leukemia patients with active disease.

Haploidentical versus matched donor stem cell transplantation for patients with hematological malignancies: a systemic review and meta-analysis

We compared the safety and efficacy of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) to matched donor SCT (matched-SCT) in treating hematological malignancies. The Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched through 21 June 2017 using the search term "(hematological disease) AND matched AND (haploidentical OR haplo-identical OR haplo identical OR haplo transplantation OR haplo transplant OR haplo-SCT OR haplo-HSCT OR haplo-HCT)." Twenty-five studies enrolling 11,359 patients (haplo-SCT: 2677; matched-SCT: 8682) were included. The primary outcomes were acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), non-relapse mortality, and 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse. Haplo-SCT was associated with similar risks as matched-SCT for all primary endpoints. Subgroup analysis of patients who received a matched-SCT from a related donor revealed that patients who received haplo-SCT had a lower risk of acute GVHD. Among patients who received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), those who received haplo-SCT had a higher risk of acute grade II-IV GVHD and non-relapse mortality than did patients who received a matched-SCT from a related or unrelated donor. Haplo-SCT should continue to be considered as a safe and effective transplant option when a matched donor is unavailable, but it may not be suitable for patients who receive RIC.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Older Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease that affects adults aged 65 years and above, and survival in this population is poor. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative therapy for these patients but is underutilized due to frequent comorbidities and perceived higher risk of treatment-related mortality and non-relapse mortality. Increasing data supports the utility of allo-HCT in fit older patients after intensive chemotherapy resulting in improvement of outcomes. With the development of reduced intensity and non-myeloablative conditioning regimens that are associated with lower rates of treatment-related toxicity and mortality, this has allowed more older patients with AML to receive allo-HCT. In this review, we provide some guidance on appropriate selection of older patients as transplant candidates, benefits and risks associated with allo-HCT, conditioning regimen choice, and stem cell transplant sources as they relate to the conduct of stem cell transplantation in older patients.

Propensity Score Analysis of Conditioning Intensity in Peripheral Blood Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

T cell replete HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide was originally described using a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen. Given that myeloablative conditioning (MAC) is more effective at preventing disease relapse, we compared outcomes of patients receiving MAC and RIC regimens. We evaluated overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of 148 patients that underwent haplo-HCT with either MAC (n = 61) or RIC (n = 87). Propensity score adjustment (PSA) was used to balance baseline characteristics between groups and more effectively compare outcomes based on conditioning intensity. After the PSA analysis, relapse was significantly decreased with MAC (hazard ratio [HR], .47; 95% confidence interval [CI], .31 to .70), but was associated with higher NRM (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.67). OS and DFS were not significantly different between groups (HRs for MAC versus RIC were .87 [95% CI, .64 to 1.18] and .90 [95% CI, .68 to 1.18] for OS and DFS, respectively). Rates of acute and chronic GVHD were not significantly different between groups. This analysis suggests that both MAC and RIC regimens are effective in haplo-HCT and that MAC regimens may result in less relapse in selected patients. These results need to be verified in a larger registry study.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy after T-cell replete HLA-haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis

A 52-year-old man suffered from progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) after human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY). Mirtazapine, mefloquine, and cytarabine failed to improve his symptoms, and he finally died 4.5 months after PML onset. This is the first case report of a patient with PML after HLA-haploidentical transplantation with PTCY. Although T-cell replete HLA-haploidentical transplantation with PTCY has enabled early immune reconstitution, PML should be considered if a patient's mental condition deteriorates.

Donor-lymphocyte infusion following haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation with peripheral blood stem cell grafts and PTCy

Donor-lymphocyte infusion (DLI) for relapse following haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haploHCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has been described in recipients of bone marrow grafts, but not recipients of G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood (PB) grafts. We retrospectively identified patients who underwent DLI following PB-haploHCT with PTCy for relapse, or loss of chimerism (LOC). Twelve patients (57%) received DLI for hematologic relapse/persistent disease, seven (33%) for extramedullary relapse and two (10%) for LOC. Sixteen (76%) received chemotherapy prior to DLI, which did not correlate with response. The most common first dose was 1 × 10⁶ CD3⁺ cells/kg. Two patients developed grade I aGvHD post DLI, one had grade II and two had grade III. One developed mild skin cGvHD 1361 days post DLI. Pre-DLI aGvHD predicted post-DLI aGvHD (P=0.025). Six patients achieved CR after DLI for overt relapse, one achieved full donor chimerism after LOC. Patients with LOC or EM relapse had superior relapse-free survival following DLI (P=0.029). DLI following PB-haploHCT with PTCy is a viable salvage therapy for overt relapse or LOC without a substantial increase in GvHD, and donor lymphocytes may be collected simultaneously with graft collection to facilitate availability in patients at high risk of relapse.

Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult acute myeloid leukemia: a position statement from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Allogeneic blood or marrow hematopoietic cell transplantation continues to be the most potent anti-leukemic treatment for adult patients with standard, high-risk, or chemo-refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Until recently, this procedure was generally limited to those recipients who had an available matched-sibling donor or matched-unrelated donor. Technical advances in graft cell processing and manipulation, control of bidirectional T cell alloreactivity, graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, and other supportive measures in haploidentical transplantation now enable nearly all patients with acute myeloid leukemia to benefit from the graft-versus-leukemia effect with substantial reduction in procedure-related mortality. Over recent years, haploidentical donors have been increasingly adopted as a valid donor source in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in the absence of an HLA-matched donor. Among centers of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, the use of haploidentical related donor transplantation has increased by 250% since 2010, and 291% since 2005. On behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, we summarize recent utilization trends in haploidentical transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia and describe the transformative changes in haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation techniques over the past decade, which have led to the current widespread use of this procedure. Furthermore, we review the efficacy of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia from available studies, including preliminary comparative studies, and bring attention to remaining unanswered questions and directions for future research. We conclude this report with our recommendations for the role of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia.

Similar outcomes after haploidentical transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus HLA-matched transplantation: a meta-analysis of case-control studies

Background

Outcomes of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) have greatly improved. It remains unknown whether haplo-HCT with PT-Cy was associated with poor outcomes when compared with HLA-matched HCT. To address this issue, we performed a meta-analysis to compare outcomes of haplo-HCT with PT-Cy with those of HLA-matched HCT.

Methods

A systematic search for case-control studies were performed in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Using a random model, the risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were pooled for the final analysis.

Results

Nine case-control studies including 2258 patients (827 patients in the haplo-HCT with PT-Cy group, 748 controls from HLA-matched related donors (MRD), and 683 controls from HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUD)) met the inclusion criteria. No differences were found between haplo-HCT with PT-Cy and HLA-matched HCT with regard to acute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), non-relapse mortality, relapse, progression free survival and overall survival. However, haplo-HCT with PT-Cy was found to be associated with a lower incidence of moderate to severe chronic GVHD (Haplo vs MRD: RR=0.54; 95% CI=0.39-0.75; Haplo vs MUD: RR=0.70; 95% CI=0.56-0.88).

Conclusions

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that haplo-HCT with PT-Cy can achieve comparable outcomes with those of HLA-matched HCT. Haploidentical donors can be a feasible and valid alternative when conventional HLA-matched donors are unavailable.

Alternative Donor Graft Sources for Adults with Hematologic Malignancies: A Donor for All Patients in 2017!

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is potentially curative for a wide variety of malignant diseases, including acute and leukemias, lymphoma, and myelodysplasia. Choice of a stem cell donor is dependent on donor availability, donor compatibility and health, recipient disease type, and recipient condition. Current sources of stem cell donation for HSCT are matched sibling donors (MSDs), matched unrelated donors (MUDs), 1-antigen mismatched unrelated donors (MMUDs), haploidentical donors (haplo), and umbilical cord blood (UCB) units. Historically, preferred donors for HSCT have been human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donors; however, only about 30% of U.S. patients will have a MSD available. The majority of patients referred for HSCT will require an alternative donor graft: MUD, MMUD, UCB, or haplo. The likelihood of finding a MUD varies depending on the ethnicity of the recipient. White Caucasians of European descent have the greatest chance of finding a MUD. Chances of finding a MUD are significantly less for African-American or Hispanic recipients due to HLA polymorphisms. Therefore, MMUD, UCB, and haplo donor graft sources expand the donor pool for recipients who do not have a MSD or MUD available. Given the variety of different donor stem cell sources available today, nearly every patient who needs an allogeneic HSCT has a potential donor in 2017. All transplant-eligible patients with hematologic malignancies should be evaluated by a transplant center to determine if HSCT is a viable treatment option for their underlying disease process.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The goal of this review is to increase the awareness of oncology practitioners to the availability of alternative donor stem cell transplants for patients with hematologic malignancies. Despite new agents, stem cell transplant remains the only curative therapy for many patients with acute and chronic leukemia, myelodysplasia, and lymphoma. Given the variety of different donor stem cell sources available today, nearly every patient who needs an allogeneic stem cell transplant will have a donor.

Related haploidentical donors are a better choice than matched unrelated donors: Point

Publisher's Note: This article has a companion Counterpoint by Shaw. Publisher's Note: Join in the discussion of these articles at Blood Advances Community Conversations.

T Cell-Replete Peripheral Blood Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Results in Outcomes Similar to Transplantation from Traditionally Matched Donors in Active Disease Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who fail to achieve complete remission remain poor. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been shown to induce long-term survival in AML patients with active disease. HCT is largely performed with HLA-matched unrelated or HLA-matched related donors. Recently, HCT with HLA-haploidentical related donors has been identified as a feasible option when HLA-matched donors are not immediately available. However, there are little data comparing outcomes for AML patients with active disease who receive haploidentical versus traditionally matched HCT. We retrospectively analyzed data from 99 AML patients with active disease undergoing allogeneic HCT at a single institution. Forty-three patients received unrelated donor HCT, 32 patients received matched related donor HCT, and 24 patients received peripheral blood haploidentical HCT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide. We found no significant differences between treatment groups in terms of overall survival (OS), event-free survival, transplantation-related mortality, cumulative incidence of relapse, and cumulative incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We performed univariate regression analysis of variables that modified OS in all patients and found only younger age at transplantation and development of chronic GVHD significantly improved outcome. Although limited by our relatively small sample size, these results indicate that haploidentical HCT in active AML patients have comparable outcomes to HCT with traditionally matched donors. Haploidentical HCT can be considered in this population of high-risk patients when matched donors are unavailable or when wait times for transplantation are unacceptably long.