Fresh or Cryopreserved CD34+-Selected Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem and Progenitor Cells for the Treatment of Poor Graft Function after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Active infection at the time of CD34+ selected stem cell boost is associated with treatment failure and poor overall survival

ABSTRACT

The use of CD34+ selected stem cell boost (SCB) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) has been increasing. Predictors of treatment failure after SCB, both in the context of poor graft function (PGF) or other settings, are not well characterized. We report among the largest single-center retrospective experiences of the use of SCB and evaluate potential predictors of response and outcomes. A total of 58 patients who underwent HCT between 2015 and 2022 and who received SCB, were identified. The indication for SCB was predominantly PGF, defined as the presence of ≥2 cytopenias for at least 2 consecutive weeks beyond day +14 after allo-HCT in the presence of ≤30% bone marrow cellularity and ≥90% donor myeloid chimerism in the absence of morphologic disease. The median dose of infused CD34+ selected SCB products was 3.88 × 106 CD34+ cells per kg (range, 0.99 × 106 to 9.92 × 106). The median 2-year overall survival and nonrelapse mortality after SCB was 47% and 38%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of 6-month grade 3 to 4 acute and 2-year moderate-severe chronic graft-versus-host disease after SCB were 3.4% and 12%, respectively. Overall response (complete response + partial response) was attained in 36 of 58 patients (62%) and in 69% of patients with PGF. On multivariable analysis, an active infection at the time of SCB was the greatest predictor of poor response and survival (P = .013) after SCB. SCB can restore hematopoiesis in the majority of patients, particularly for those with PGF and in whom there is no active infection at the time of infusion.

Progress on Electro-Enhancement of Cell Manufacturing

With the long persistence of complex, chronic diseases in society, there is increasing motivation to develop cells as living medicine to treat diseases ranging from cancer to wounds. While cell therapies can significantly impact healthcare, the shortage of starter cells meant that considerable raw materials must be channeled solely for cell expansion, leading to expensive products with long manufacturing time which can prevent accessibility by patients who either cannot afford the treatment or have highly aggressive diseases and cannot wait that long. Over the last three decades, there has been increasing knowledge on the effects of electrical modulation on proliferation, but to the best of the knowledge, none of these studies went beyond how electro-control of cell proliferation may be extended to enhance industrial scale cell manufacturing. Here, this review is started by discussing the importance of maximizing cell yield during manufacturing before comparing strategies spanning biomolecular/chemical/physical to modulate cell proliferation. Next, the authors describe how factors governing invasive and non-invasive electrical stimulation (ES) including capacitive coupling electric field may be modified to boost cell manufacturing. This review concludes by describing what needs to be urgently performed to bridge the gap between academic investigation of ES to industrial applications.

Prospects and Potential for Chimerism Analysis after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Chimerism analysis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation serves to confirm engraftment, indicate relapse of hematologic malignancy, and attribute graft failure to either immune rejection or poor graft function. Short tandem repeat PCR (STR-PCR) is the prevailing method, followed by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), with detection limits of 1-5% and 0.1%, respectively. Chimerism assays using digital PCR or next-generation sequencing, both of which are more sensitive than STR-PCR, are increasingly used. Stable mixed chimerism is usually not associated with poor outcomes in non-malignant diseases, but recipient chimerism may foretell relapse of hematologic malignancies, so higher detection sensitivity may be beneficial in such cases. Thus, the need for and the type of intervention, e.g., immunosuppression regimen, donor lymphocyte infusion, and/or salvage second transplantation, should be guided by donor chimerism in the context of the feature and/or residual malignant cells of the disease to be treated.

Eltrombopag treatment in thrombocytopenia following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A multicenter real-world experience

INTRODUCTION

Thrombocytopenia is among the most common complications following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity with no standard treatment yet. In this multicenter and retrospective study, we aim to present our multi-center experience of Eltrombopag treatment in patients with isolated thrombocytopenia following HSCT.

MATERIAL-METHOD

A total of 73 patients from 5 centers who underwent autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation, had no primary disease relapse, all of whom had neutrophil engraftment, complete chimerism, and who were diagnosed with Prolonged Isolated Thrombocytopenia (PIT) or Secondary Failure Of Platelet Recovery (SFPR) were included in the study. The patients were initiated on Eltrombopag at a dose of 50-150 mg. Complete response was defined as a platelet count >50×109/L for 7 consecutive days with no transfusion support.

RESULTS

A total of 50.3% of the patients underwent Autologous and 49.7% Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, 54.8% were diagnosed with PIT, and 45.2% were diagnosed with SFPR, and the treatment with 50-150 mg/day Eltrombopag was initiated on the median day +42. Complete response was achieved in 71.2% of these patients on the median day 23 of the treatment. No significant effects of the initial dose (50-150 mg/day) were detected in the Complete Response in the multivariate analysis on response. An insufficient number of Megakaryocytes in the bone marrow before Eltrombopag treatment was determined as an independent risk factor in determining the response (OR 3.57, 95% CI 1.21-10.55). The overall survival of the patients who did not respond to Eltrombopag was found to be significantly worse than that of patients who responded (p=0.022, HR:2.74, 95% CI 1.12-6.54).

CONCLUSION

As a result of the present study, Eltrombopag treatment was found to be effective and safe in thrombocytopenia that develops following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. It was concluded that its use may be more effective in patients with sufficient bone marrow megakaryocytes before the treatment and an initial dose of 50 mg/day may be appropriate in terms of cost, effectiveness, and toxicity. Large-scale randomized and controlled prospective studies are needed to determine the roles of Eltrombopag treatment in patients with post-transplant PIT and SFPR.

Janus kinase inhibition in the treatment and prevention of graft-versus-host disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). For many years, corticosteroids have been the mainstay treatment for GVHD, but cases of steroid-refractory GVHD and the severe adverse effects of high-dose corticosteroids have increased the need for preventative and therapeutic strategies for GVHD. Due to the nature of alloreactive T cells, GVHD is inherently linked to the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect, the therapeutic driving force behind stem cell transplantation. A considerable clinical challenge is to preserve GVL while suppressing GVHD. The field of GVHD research has greatly expanded over the past decades, including advancements in T cell modulation and depletion, antibody therapies, chemotherapeutics, cellular therapies, and Janus kinase inhibition. In this review, we discuss current approaches and advances in the prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD with a focus on new emerging advancements in Janus kinase inhibitor therapy.

Fresh or frozen grafts for allogeneic stem cell transplantation: conceptual considerations and a survey on the practice during the COVID-19 pandemic from the EBMT Infectious Diseases Working Party (IDWP) and Cellular Therapy & Immunobiology Working Party (CTIWP)

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on medical practices, including the delivery of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In response, transplant centers have made changes to their procedures, including an increased use of cryopreservation for allogeneic haematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) grafts. The use of cryopreserved grafts for allogeneic HCT has been reviewed and analysed in terms of potential benefits and drawbacks based on existing data on impact on cell subsets, hematological recovery, and clinical outcomes of approximately 2000 patients from different studies. A survey of European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centers was also conducted to assess changes in practice during the pandemic and any unnecessary burdens on HPC donors. Before the pandemic, only 7.4% of transplant centers were routinely cryopreserving HPC products, but this percentage increased to 90% during the pandemic. The results of this review and survey suggest that cryopreservation of HPC grafts is a viable option for allogeneic HCT in certain situations, but further research is needed to determine long-term effects and ethical discussions are required to balance the needs of donors and patients when using frozen allografts.

Eltrombopag for the Treatment of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation-Related Poor Graft Function

INTRODUCTION

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a crucial therapeutic strategy for hematological and non-hematological disorders. Poor graft function (PGF) after ASCT presents a critical challenge that does not have a standardized treatment approach. A thrombopoietin-mimetic oral drug eltrombopag shows promise in some bone failure syndromes. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of eltrombopag in treating PGF after ASCT.

METHODS

Patients receiving eltrombopag for PGF after ASCT between 2017 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients' characteristics, details for ASCT, timing, treatment, and possible contributors for PGF, response to eltrombopag treatment, and overall response rate (ORR) were analyzed.  Results: Eighteen patients were assessed. Eltrombopag treatment yielded a favorable response in 11 patients, resulting in an ORR of 61%. The ORR in secondary PGF was better than that in primary PGF (83% and 17% respectively). There was a marked enhancement in platelet and hemoglobin levels following eltrombopag treatment (p=0.001 and p=0.030, respectively), while neutrophil values exhibited no significant change (p=0.8). Among the responding patients, four individuals (22%) underwent a tapering and discontinuation of eltrombopag. No toxicity was observed above grade one, and no patient discontinued eltrombopag because of intolerability or adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Our findings affirm that eltrombopag can treat poor graft function after allogeneic stem cell transplantation without significant toxicities. These results contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of eltrombopag in poor graft function after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, providing insights into its potential benefits and limitations.

Definitions, incidence and outcome of poor graft function after hematopoietic cell transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Poor graft function (PGF) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is a serious complication with high morbidity and mortality. The reported incidence of PGF, its risk factors and outcome vary substantially between studies. This variability may be explained by heterogeneity in patient cohorts and HCT strategies, differences in the underlying causes of cytopenia, as well as by differences in PGF definition. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we provide an overview of the various PGF definitions used and determined the impact of this variability on the reported incidence and outcome. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science up to July 2022, for any study on PGF in HCT recipients. We performed random-effect meta-analyses for incidence and outcome and subgroup analyses based on different PGF criteria. Among 69 included studies (14.265 HCT recipients), we found 63 different PGF definitions, using various combinations of 11 common criteria. The median incidence of PGF was 7% (IQR: 5-11%, 22 cohorts). The pooled survival of PGF patients was 53% (95% CI: 45-61%, 23 cohorts). The most commonly reported risk factors associated with PGF were history of cytomegalovirus infection and prior graft-versus-host disease. Incidence was lower in studies with strict cytopenic cutoffs, while survival was lower for primary compared to secondary PGF. This work indicates that a standardized, quantitative definition of PGF is needed to facilitate clinical guideline development and to advance scientific progress.

CD34 Stem Cell Boost in Pediatric Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Case Series and Review of Literature

Patients with poor graft function (PGF) or declining donor chimerism (DC) post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) may benefit from a CD34-selected stem cell boost (SCB). We retrospectively studied outcomes of fourteen pediatric patients (PGF: 12 and declining DC: 2), with a median age of 12.8 (range 0.08-20.6) years at HCT, who received a SCB. Primary and secondary endpoints included resolution of PGF or improvement in DC (≥ 15% increase), overall survival (OS) and transplant-related mortality (TRM), respectively. The median CD34 dose infused was 7.47 × 10⁶/kg (range 3.51 × 10⁶-3.39 × 10⁷/kg). Among patients with PGF who survived ≥ 3 months post-SCB (n = 8), we observed a non-significant decrease in the cumulative median number of red cell transfusions, platelet transfusions, and GCSF but not intravenous immunoglobulin doses in the 3 months before and after SCB. Overall response rate (ORR) was 50%, with 29% complete and 21% partial responses. ORR was better in recipients who received lymphodepletion (LD) pre-SCB versus none (75% versus 40%; p = 0.56). The incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease was 7% and 14%, respectively. The 1-year OS was 50% (95% CI 23-72%) and TRM was 29% (95% CI 8-58%). SCB was effective in half of our cohort with possible benefit of LD pre-SCB.

Efficacy and safety of avatrombopag for thrombocytopenia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A real-world data evaluation on 14 cases

OBJECTIVES

Thrombocytopenia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a common and serious complication that leads to an increased risk of bleeding and poor prognosis. Traditional strategies consist of platelet transfusion, glucocorticoid therapy, intravenous human immunoglobulin, recombinant human thrombopoietin injection, and CD34+-selected hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, but the effects of these treatments are not satisfactory and the treatment continues to be challenged. This study aims to determine the treating efficacy of avatrombopag, a novel thrombopoietin receptor agonist, on thrombocytopenia after allo-HSCT, and to increase the evidence-based medical evidence for the clinical use of this drug.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with thrombocytopenia after allo-HSCT underwent avatrom-bopag treatment from September 2020 to September 2021 were retrospectively studied. Of these patients, 8 patients had delayed platelet engraftment (DPE) and 6 cases had secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR). The efficacy and safety of the treatment and the survival of the patients were assessed.

RESULTS

The median treatment time of avatrombopag was 34 days, and no patients stopped treatment due to adverse reactions or drug intolerance. Compared with the treatment before, the levels of platelet count, megakaryocytes, and hemoglobin in patients were significantly increased (P=0.000 1, P=0.001 0, and P=0.001 7, respectively). The optimal platelet count of 13 patients reached the complete response standard after drug withdrawal. The median follow-up time of 14 patients was 371 days, and the 2-year overall survival rate was 78.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Avatrombopag is effective on increasing platelet counts in patients with thrombocytopenia after allo-HSCT, with a good safety profile. It is a suitable therapeutic option for thrombocytopenia after allo-HSCT.

Eltrombopag for the Treatment of Poor Graft Function Following Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Real-Life Data

Background

Eltrombopag has an off-label indication for haematopoietic cell transplantation in patients experiencing delayed thrombocyte recovery and/or thrombocytopaenia.

Aims

To present our centre’s experience of using this agent not only for post- haematopoietic cell transplantation thrombocytopaenia but also for poor graft functioning in the post-haematopoietic cell transplantation setting.

Study Design

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Methods

Thirty-nine patients who had persistent cytopaenia following haematopoietic cell transplantation and treated with eltrombopag at our centre between October 2011 and December 2021 were retrospectively identified. During this period, 9 (23.1%) and 30 (76.9%) patients who underwent allogeneic transplantations, respectively, received eltrombopag.

Results

The female-to-male ratio was 12:27, and the median transplant age was 49 (18-70) years. Eight (20.5%) patients had isolated thrombocytopaenia, 19 (49.4%) had bi-lineage cytopaenia and 12 (30.1%) had pancytopaenia. Patients received a median of 50 mg/day (25-150 mg/day) of eltrombopagfor a median duration of 82 (24-386) days. Nine (23.1%) patients had autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation, and 30 (76.9%) had allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (14 unrelated, 9 sibling and 7 haploidentical). The median donor age was 32 (20-67) years. The median follow-up was 16.4 (1.8-84.3) months. The median pre-treatment platelet count was 11x10⁹/l (1-23), which increased to 41x10⁹/l (6-150). The median platelet count increment was 29.5x10⁹/l (p = 0.001). The pre-treatment median neutrophil count was 1.19x10⁹/l (0.39-5.1), which increased to 2.35 x10⁹/l (0.1-5.33) (p = 0.05), and the pre-treatment median haemoglobin was 8.3 (6.2-14) g/dl, which increased to 10 (6.2-14) g/dl (p = 0.001) with eltrombopag. No eltrombopag-related hepatotoxicity occurred; however, 1 (2.6%) patient failed to continue treatment because of two consecutive episodes of deep venous thrombosis. Six (15.4%) patients were unresponsive to eltrombopag and dependent on blood product transfusions. After a median time of 82 days, 61.5% of the patients discontinued eltrombopag successfully.

Conclusion

The results confirmed that eltrombopag could provide a rapid, sustained response in patients with poor graft functioning after haematopoietic cell transplantation. This finding is essential given the high rate of non-relapse mortality caused by poor graft functioning after haematopoietic cell transplantation.

Graft failure in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients: diagnosis and treatment

Graft failure is a group of complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which occurs according to different data up to 30%. The group of complications includes primary and secondary graft failure, primary, secondary and transient poor graft function and graft rejection. Diagnostic difficulties consist in the lack of unified diagnostic criteria accepted in the transplantation community and in the dual interpretation of these complications according to the foreign literature. The purpose of this literature review was to identify the most common criteria of different types of graft failure and determine the tactics of diagnosis and treatment. In this review we analyzed data from various literature sources, gave definitions of graft failure and poor graft function. We analyzed the literature data on the methods used to treat these conditions.

Durable Engraftment and Excellent Overall Survival After CD34-Selected Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Boost in Pediatric Patients With Poor Graft Function Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Poor graft function (PGF) is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Historically, outcomes of patients with PGF have been very poor, and there are no standardized approaches to treatment. Furthermore, few outcomes after CD34-selected stem cell boost (CD34+SCB) for PGF in pediatric alloSCT recipients have been reported. Here we report on a single center experience with CD34+SCB for PGF after alloSCT in patients treated on the Pediatric Transplant and Cellular Therapy Service at MSK Kids, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. A retrospective analysis of patients transplanted for malignant and nonmalignant disorders who received a CD34+SCB between 2008 to 2020 for treatment of PGF defined as the need for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and/or packed red blood cell or platelet transfusion support with bone marrow donor chimerism ≥85%. Peripheral blood stem cells from the original donor were the source for CD34+SCB. Durable complete recovery (durable CR) was defined as recovery of peripheral blood counts without recurrent need for G-CSF or transfusion support. The main outcomes of interest were recovery of hematopoiesis and overall survival. Development of graft versus host disease (GVHD) was an additional outcome of interest. Fourteen patients with PGF received a boost. Six patients had no known infection, while 8 patients had PGF associated with an infection. The probability of CR at 60 days was 79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57%-100%). The overall survival at both 2 and 5 years was 78% (95% CI, 56%-100%). One patient developed GVHD, which was fatal. No other CD34+SCB-related toxicities were observed. While including patients with PGF as recently defined by the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, as well as PGF in patients with concomitant infections, we demonstrate that CD34+SCB is safe and can provide for durable trilineage hematopoietic recovery and long-term survival in pediatric patients after alloSCT.

Recent Advancements in Poor Graft Function Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Poor graft function (PGF) is a life-threatening complication that occurs after transplantation and has a poor prognosis. With the rapid development of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the pathogenesis of PGF has become an important issue. Studies of the pathogenesis of PGF have resulted in some success in CD34⁺-selected stem cell boosting. Mesenchymal stem cells, N-acetyl-l-cysteine, and eltrombopag have also been investigated as therapeutic strategies for PGF. However, predicting and preventing PGF remains challenging. Here, we propose that the seed, soil, and insect theories of aplastic anemia also apply to PGF; CD34⁺ cells are compared to seeds; the bone marrow microenvironment to soil; and virus infection, iron overload, and donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies to insects. From this perspective, we summarize the available information on the common risk factors of PGF, focusing on its potential mechanism. In addition, the safety and efficacy of new strategies for treating PGF are discussed to provide a foundation for preventing and treating this complex clinical problem.

Clinical features, pathophysiology, and therapy of poor graft function post-allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Poor graft function (PGF), defined by the presence of multilineage cytopenias in the presence of 100% donor chimerism, is a serious complication of allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). Inducers or potentiators of alloimmunity such as cytomegalovirus reactivation and graft-versus-host disease are associated with the development of PGF, however, more clinical studies are required to establish further risk factors and describe outcomes of PGF. The pathophysiology of PGF can be conceptualized as dysfunction related to the number or productivity of the stem cell compartment, defects in bone marrow microenvironment components such as mesenchymal stromal cells and endothelial cells, or immunological suppression of post-alloSCT hematopoiesis. Treatment strategies focused on improving stem cell number and function and microenvironment support of hematopoiesis have been attempted with variable success. There has been limited use of immune manipulation as a therapeutic strategy, but emerging therapies hold promise. This review details the current understanding of the causes of PGF and methods of treatment to provide a framework for clinicians managing this complex problem.

Outcomes with CD34-Selected Stem Cell Boost for Poor Graft Function after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Poor graft function (PGF) is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) characterized by multilineage cytopenia in the absence of mixed donor chimerism (<95% donor), relapse, or severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We present a systemic review and meta-analysis aimed at assessing the outcomes with CD34-selected stem cell boost (SCB) for PGF in adult allo-HSCT recipients. We screened a total of 1753 records identified from 4 databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, using the search terms "hematological malignancies," "hematopoietic stem cell transplantation," "CD34 antigen(s)," "graft failure," and "poor graft function," from the date of inception to January 2021. After excluding review, duplicate, and nonrelevant articles, we included 7 studies reporting outcomes following administration of CD34-selected SCB for PGF after allo-HSCT, including hematologic complete response (CR) and overall response rate (ORR), GVHD, and overall survival (OS). Quality evaluation was done using the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool. Pooled analysis was done using the R 'meta' package, and proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. The inter-study variance was calculated using the Der Simonian-Laird estimator. We identified 209 patients who received CD34-selected SCB for PGF after allo-HSCT. The median age was 49 years (range, 18 to 69 years), and 61% were men. Primary graft sources included peripheral blood stem cells (72%) and bone marrow (28%). Donor types were matched sibling (37%), matched unrelated (36%), mismatched unrelated (22%), and haploidentical donors (5%). The median time from allo-HSCT to SCB was 138 days (range, 113 to 450 days). The median SCB dose was 3.45 × 10⁶ CD34 cells/kg (range, 3.1 to 4.9 × 10⁶ cells/kg). CR and ORR were 72% (95% CI, 63% to 79%; I² = 26%) and 80% (95% CI, 74% to 85%; I² = 0%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 42 months (range, 30 to 77 months), the actuarial survival rate was 54% (95% CI, 47% to 61%; I² = 0%). OS ranged from 80% at 1 year to 40% at 9 years. The incidences of acute and chronic GVHD after SCB were 17% (95% CI, 13% to 23%; I² = 0%) and 18% (95% CI, 8% to 34%; I² = 76%), respectively. Nonrelapse mortality was reported in 42 patients, with a pooled rate of 27% (95% CI, 17% to 40; I² = 59%), and death due to relapse was reported in 25 patients, with a pooled rate of 17% (95% CI, 11% to 23%; I² = 0%). Our data show that CD34-selected SCB improves outcomes after PGF post allo-HSCT with an acceptable toxicity profile. The literature lacks high-quality randomized evidence, and there remains an unmet need for prospective studies to address the optimal dosing and manipulation of SCB. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Eltrombopag for the treatment of poor graft function following allogeneic stem cell transplant: a retrospective multicenter study

This retrospective study assessed the effectiveness of eltrombopag (EPAG), a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, in the treatment of poor graft function (PGF) following an allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Complete response was defined as normalization of blood counts, whereas partial response was defined as transfusion independence. A total of 48 patients with full donor chimerism after HSCT, received EPAG for a median of 120 days (range 10-591). Patients with uni- bi- or tri-lineage cytopenia started treatment at a median of 95 days (range 17-877) after HSCT. The overall response rate was 75%: 24 patients had a complete response and 12 had a partial response. Positive predictors of response were an HLA-matched donor, a CD34⁺ dose at transplant > 4 × 10⁶/kg, and starting EPAG treatment at least 90 days after HSCT. Patients with more than one positive predictor had a response rate of 92% for the overall patient cohort and 94% for patients with tri-lineage cytopenia. One-year survival was 89% for complete responders, 60% for partial responders and 20% for non-responders (p = 0.0004). EPAG improves peripheral blood counts in patients with poor graft function following HSCT. Response to EPAG can be predicted and has a significant impact on survival.

Evaluation of risk factors for and subsequent mortality from poor graft function (PGF) post allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Poor Graft Function (PGF) is defined by multi-lineage cytopenias with complete donor chimerism post allogeneic transplantation, Risk factors for and subsequent mortality from PGF were assessed in our transplant cohort. Non-sibling donor [OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.02-3.70], ICU admission [OR 5.28; 95% CI 2.29-11.88] or blood culture positivity within the first 30 days [OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.07-2.62], grade III-IV acute graft vs host disease (GVHD) [OR 4.082; 95% CI 2.31-7.16] and CMV viremia [OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.53-3.88] and were significantly associated with development of PGF. PGF patients without count recovery had a 2 year OS of 6%. Severe GVHD, thrombocytopenia and anemia portended inferior survival and were used to develop a prognostic score for mortality from PGF. This analysis identifies risk factors predictive of PGF and poor survival in those without recovery.

Predictors of recovery following allogeneic CD34+-selected cell infusion without conditioning to correct poor graft function

Poor graft function is a serious complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Infusion of CD34+-selected stem cells without pre-conditioning has been used to correct poor graft function, but predictors of recovery are unclear. We report the outcome of 62 consecutive patients who had primary or secondary poor graft function who underwent a CD34+-selected stem cell infusion from the same donor without further conditioning. Forty-seven of 62 patients showed hematological improvement and became permanently transfusion and growth factor-independent. In multivariate analysis, parameters significantly associated with recovery were shared CMV seronegative status for recipient/donor, the absence of active infection and matched recipient/donor sex. Recovery was similar in patients with mixed and full donor chimerism. Five -year overall survival was 74.4% (95% CI 59-89) in patients demonstrating complete recovery, 16.7% (95% CI 3-46) in patients with partial recovery and 22.2% (CI 95% 5-47) in patients with no response. In patients with count recovery, those with poor graft function in 1-2 lineages had superior 5-year overall survival (93.8%, 95% CI 82-99) than those with tri-lineage failure (53%, 95% CI 34-88). New strategies including cytokine or agonist support, or second transplant need to be investigated in patients who do not recover.

Rescue treatment with eltrombopag in refractory cytopenias after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Background:

Patients with post-transplant cytopenias due to poor graft function or primary engraftment failure show poor prognosis with a high mortality rate mainly because of graft versus host disease (GVHD), infection and/or bleeding. Treatment options are scarce and a CD34+ stem cell boost or a second bone marrow transplantation may be required to restore adequate haematopoiesis.

Methods:

In the present study patients with primary engraftment failure (n = 1) and refractory poor graft function (n = 11) were treated with eltrombopag in a single centre. The reason for eltrombopag treatment was trilineage cytopenia in six patients, bilineage cytopenia in three patients and single lineage cytopenia in three patients. Eltrombopag was initiated at a median of 214 (range: 120–877) days after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCST) and administered for a median time of 114 (range: 12 days to >490) days. In 8/12 patients eltrombopag was introduced at a dose of 75 mg/day and then increased to 150 mg/day after 1 week; 1 patient was given 50 mg eltrombopag per day, and 3 patients received 75 mg daily.

Results:

In 10/12 patients eltrombopag significantly enhanced blood count values and patients became transfusion independent. Once stable haematological response was obtained, treatment was tapered until final discontinuation in 9/10 responding patients. No grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. At time of last follow up, 3/12 patients were dead, 2 due to disease relapse, 1 due to GVHD and pneumonia. All patients except one maintained their complete response and remain transfusion independent at a median of 858 (range: 429–1119) days.

Conclusion:

These preliminary data confirm that eltrombopag is able to rescue multilineage haematopoiesis in patients with treatment-refractory cytopenias after allogeneic HSCT.

Advances in the understanding of poor graft function following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation

Poor graft function (PGF) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a life-threatening complication and is characterized by bilineage or trilineage blood cell deficiency and hypoplastic marrow with full chimerism. With the rapid development of allo-HSCT, especially haploidentical-HSCT, PGF has become a growing concern. The most common risk factors illustrated by recent studies include low dose of infused CD34+ cells, donor-specific antibody, cytomegalovirus infection, graft versus host disease (GVHD), iron overload and splenomegaly, among others. Because of the poor prognosis of PGF, it is crucial to uncover the underlying mechanism, which remains elusive. Recent studies have suggested that the bone marrow microenvironment may play an important role in the pathogenesis of PGF. Deficiency and dysfunction of endothelial cells and mesenchymal stem cells, elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, and immune abnormalities are believed to contribute to PGF. In this review, we also discuss recent clinical trials that evaluate the safety and efficacy of new strategies in patients with PGF. CD34+-selected stem-cell boost (SCB) is effective with an acceptable incidence of GVHD, despite the need for a second donation. Alternative strategies including the applications of mesenchymal stem cells, N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC), and eltrombopag have shown favorable outcomes, but further large-scale studies are needed due to the small sample sizes of the recent clinical trials.

Eltrombopag treatment promotes platelet recovery and reduces platelet transfusion for patients with post-transplantation thrombocytopenia

Post-transplantation thrombocytopenia (PT) is a common and severe complication which usually leads to poor prognosis. Eltrombopag (EPAG), a novel oral thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist, has shown promising effects in thrombocytopenia due to immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and refractory severe aplastic anemia (rSAA), while the effectiveness of EPAG for PT patients still needs to be evaluated. A total of 32 PT patients receiving EPAG were retrospectively analyzed between September 2017 and July 2019, including 15 patients with poor graft function (PGF) and 17 patients with secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR). To date, 21 (65.6%) patients achieved overall recovery (OR) and 14 (43.8%) patients achieved complete recovery (CR). Among responders, 18 (85.7%) patients discontinued or tapered the drug and 16 (76.2%) patients successfully maintained their best response. During the EPAG treatment, responders received much lower median platelet transfusion units than non-responders (11 vs. 95, P < 0.001). After a median follow-up time of 364 days (range, 24-842), the overall survival in these patients was 78.1% (100% for responders and 36.4% for non-responders, P < 0.001). In the univariate and multivariate analysis, PGF was identified as the independent risk factor for OR (P = 0.041, HR = 5.333). Megakaryocyte (Megk) amounts (P = 0.025, HR = 14.638) and splenomegaly (P = 0.042, HR = 11.278) were identified as independent risk factors for CR. Besides, PGF patients tended to take a longer time to achieve PR and CR than SFPR patients. In conclusion, our data suggest that EPAG can promote platelet recovery and reduce platelet transfusion in PT patients.

Comparison of allogenic stem cell transplantations performed with frozen or fresh stem cell products with regard to GVHD and mortality

PURPOSE

Stem cells are collected from donors and infused to the recipient in allogenic peripheral stem cell transplantations. The use of frozen stem cells can promote donor compatibility, and overcoming possible problems due to insufficient stem cell mobilization will also be easier. Nevertheless, studies about the use of frozen peripheral stem cells in allogenic transplantation are extremely rare. In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of allogenic stem cell transplants from frozen or fresh stem cell products.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis was conducted between April 2004 and September 2018 in the bone marrow transplantation unit of Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital. Clinical data of patients who received allogenic peripheral stem cell transplantations from fully matched sibling donors were compared for 42 fresh and 30 frozen stem cell transplants.

RESULTS

While the platelet engraftment period, febrile neutropenia period, hospitalization period, and 100-day mortality rates did not show any differences, the neutrophil engraftment period was longer in the frozen group (mean: 14 days vs. 16 days, p = 0.006). Acute and chronic graftversus-host disease (GVHD) rates were similar in both groups; however, the rate of grade 3 or4 chronic liver GVHD was slightly higher in transplants performed with fresh stem cells compared to the frozen group (p = 0.046). Overall survival was similar between the groups (p = 0.700).

CONCLUSION

The use of frozen peripheral stem cells in allogenic stem cell transplantation may be a reasonable option that can be applied without causing a significant change in clinical results.

Long-Term Stability and Differentiation Potential of Cryopreserved cGMP-Compliant Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

The clinical effectiveness of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) is highly dependent on a few key quality characteristics including the generation of high quality cell bank, long-term genomic stability, post-thaw viability, plating efficiency, retention of pluripotency, directed differentiation, purity, potency, and sterility. We have already reported the establishment of iPSC master cell banks (MCBs) and working cell banks (WCBs) under current good manufacturing procedure (cGMP)-compliant conditions. In this study, we assessed the cellular and genomic stability of the iPSC lines generated and cryopreserved five years ago under cGMP-compliant conditions. iPSC lines were thawed, characterized, and directly differentiated into cells from three germ layers including cardiomyocytes (CMs), neural stem cells (NSCs), and definitive endoderm (DE). The cells were also expanded in 2D and 3D spinner flasks to evaluate their long-term expansion potential in matrix-dependent and feeder-free culture environment. All three lines successfully thawed and attached to the L7^TM matrix, and formed typical iPSC colonies that expressed pluripotency markers over 15 passages. iPSCs maintained their differentiation potential as demonstrated with spontaneous and directed differentiation to the three germ layers and corresponding expression of specific markers, respectfully. Furthermore, post-thaw cells showed normal karyotype, negative mycoplasma, and sterility testing. These cells maintained both their 2D and 3D proliferation potential after five years of cryopreservation without acquiring karyotype abnormality, loss of pluripotency, and telomerase activity. These results illustrate the long-term stability of cGMP iPSC lines, which is an important step in establishing a reliable, long-term source of starting materials for clinical and commercial manufacturing of iPSC-derived cell therapy products.

Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor-Primed Unmanipulated Haploidentical Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), a growth factor for neutrophils, has been successfully used for stem cell mobilization and T cell immune tolerance induction. The establishment of G-CSF-primed unmanipulated haploidentical blood and marrow transplantation (The Beijing Protocol) has achieved outcomes for the treatment of acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and severe aplastic anemia with haploidentical allografts comparable to those of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor transplantation. Currently, G-CSF-mobilized bone marrow and/or peripheral blood stem cell sources have been widely used in unmanipulated haploidentical transplant settings. In this review, we summarize the roles of G-CSF in inducing T cell immune tolerance. We discuss the recent advances in the Beijing Protocol, mainly focusing on strategies that have been used to improve transplant outcomes in cases of poor graft function, virus infections, and relapse. The application of G-CSF-primed allografts in other haploidentical modalities is also discussed.

A matched-pair analysis reveals marginally reduced CD34+ cell mobilization on second occasion in 27 related donors who underwent peripheral blood stem cell collection twice at the same institution

BACKGROUND

In a small proportion of cases, hematopoietic function is insufficient after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, as a result of poor graft function or graft failure. These complications are common indications of re-mobilization of the initial donor, either for a second allograft or for an infusion of CD34+ Selected stem Cell Boost (SCB).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed the results of two cycles of CD34+ cell mobilization and collection. CD34+ cells mobilized and collected at each cycle were compared. When CD34+ cell selection from the collected allogeneic mononuclear cells was indicated, it was performed with the Clinimacs Plus® medical device, and results from in-process and final quality checks were analyzed. To assess the efficacy of CD34+ SCB, transfusion needs before and after the infusion of selected CD34+ cells were calculated.

RESULTS

The median peripheral blood concentration of CD34+ cells/μL was marginally reduced during the second cycle (35.6 vs 33.8, p < 0.05); results revealed a strong correlation between paired values (r = 0.85). The cumulative number of collected CD34+ cells were similar for both cycles; the total processed blood volume was higher during the second cycle (p = 0.023). For CD34+ immune-selection procedures, CD34+ cell recovery and purity were respectively 57% and 95%, with a median T-cell depletion of 6.7 log. Recipients' needs for platelet and red blood cell transfusions were significantly reduced after CD34+ SCB.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the feasibility of a second cycle of mobilization in healthy related donors and the benefits of CD34+ SCB on hematopoietic reconstitution.

Robust Selections of Various Hematopoietic Cell Fractions on the CliniMACS Plus Instrument

Cell separation technologies play a vital role in the graft engineering of hematopoietic cellular fractions, particularly with the rapid expansion of the field of cellular therapeutics. The CliniMACS Plus Instrument (Miltenyi Biotec) utilizes immunomagnetic techniques to isolate hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs), T cells, NK cells, and monocytes. These products are ultimately used for HPC transplantation and for the manufacture of adoptive immunotherapies. We evaluated the viable cell recovery and cell purity of selections and depletions performed on the CliniMACS Plus over a 10-year period at our facility, specifically assessing for the isolation of CD34+, CD4+, CD3+/CD56+, CD4+/CD8+, and CD25+ cells. Additionally, patient- and instrument-related factors affecting these parameters were examined. Viable cell recovery ranged from 32.3 ± 10.2% to 65.4 ± 15.4%, and was the highest for CD34+ selections. Cell purity ranged from 86.3 ± 7.2% to 99.0 ± 1.1%, and was the highest for CD4+ selections. Undesired cell fractions demonstrated a range of 1.2 ± 0.45 to 5.1 ± 0.4 log reductions. Red cell depletions averaged 2.12 ± 0.68 logs, while platelets were reduced by an average of 4.01 ± 1.57 logs. Donor characteristics did not impact viable cell recovery or cell purity for CD34+ or CD4+ cell enrichments; however, these were affected by manufacturing variables, including tubing size, bead quantity, and whether preselection platelet washes were performed. Our data demonstrate the efficient recovery of hematopoietic cellular fractions on the CliniMACS Plus that may be optimized by adjusting manufacturing variables.

[Effects of CD34(+) selected stem cells for the treatment of poor graft function after allogeneic stem cell transplantation]

目的

观察输注纯化供者CD34⁺细胞治疗单倍型造血干细胞移植后移植物功能不良的疗效和安全性。

方法

对2014年1月至2018年3月期间接受供者纯化CD34⁺细胞治疗的12例单倍型造血干细胞移植后移植物功能不良患者进行回顾性分析。

结果

12例患者中男9例、女3例，中位年龄26（14~54）岁；急性淋巴细胞白血病4例，急性髓系白血病5例，慢性髓性白血病2例，慢性粒-单核细胞白血病1例。分选产物CD34⁺细胞纯度为92.0%（44.0%~97.0%），回收率为55.0%（45.0%~96.7%），回输CD34⁺细胞的中位数为1.9（0.9~4.4）×10⁶/kg，CD3⁺细胞中位数为0.6（0.3~2.0）×10⁴/kg。中性粒细胞恢复中位时间为18（14~39）d，血小板恢复中位时间为29（16~153）d，红细胞恢复中位时间为60（9~124）d。12例患者输注过程中未发生严重不良反应，10例获得完全缓解，1例患者获得部分缓解，1例患者无效，未发生重症感染和重度GVHD。

结论

回输供者纯化CD34⁺细胞是单倍型造血干细胞移植后植入功能不良的一种安全、有效治疗方法。

[Second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant: Guidelines from the francophone Society of bone marrow transplantation and cellular therapy (SFGM-TC)]

Disease recurrence and graft dysfunction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) currently remain among the major causes of treatment failure in malignant and non-malignant hematological diseases. A second allo-HSCT is a valuable therapeutic option to salvage those situations. During the 8th annual harmonization workshops of the french Society of bone marrow transplantation and cellular therapy (SFGM-TC), a designated working group reviewed the literature in order to elaborate unified guidelines on feasibility, indications, donor choice and conditioning in the case of a second allo-HSCT. In case of relapse, a second allo-HSCT with reduced intensity or non-myeloablative conditioning is a reasonable option, particularly in patients with a good performance status (Karnofsky/Lansky>80%), low co-morbidity score (EBMT score≤3), a longer remission duration after the first allo-HSCT (>6 months), and who present low disease burden at the time of second allo-HSCT. Matched related donors tend to be associated with better outcomes. In the presence of graft dysfunction (primary and secondary graft rejection), an immunoablative conditioning regimen is recommended. A donor change remains a valid option, especially in the absence of graft-versus-host disease after the first allo-HSCT.

Platelet number and graft function predict intensive care survival in allogeneic stem cell transplantation patients

Despite significant advances in the treatment of complications requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU mortality remains high for patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. We evaluated the role of thrombocytopenia and poor graft function in allogeneic stem cell recipients receiving ICU treatments along with established prognostic ICU markers in order to identify patients at risk for severe complications. At ICU admission, clinical and laboratory data of 108 allogeneic stem cell transplanted ICU patients were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Platelet counts (≤ 50,000/μl, p < 0.0005), hemoglobin levels (≤ 8.5 mg/dl, p = 0.019), and leukocyte count (≤ 1500/μl, p = 0.025) along with sepsis (p = 0.002) and acute myeloid leukemia (p < 0.0005) correlated significantly with survival. Multivariate analysis confirmed thrombocytopenia (hazard ratio (HR) 2.79 (1.58-4.92, 95% confidence interval (CI)) and anemia (HR 1.82, 1.06-3.11, 95% CI) as independent mortality risk factors. Predominant ICU diagnoses were acute respiratory failure (75%), acute kidney injury (47%), and septic shock (30%). Acute graft versus host disease was diagnosed in 42% of patients, and 47% required vasopressors. Low platelet (≤ 50,000/μl) and poor graft function are independent prognostic factors for impaired survival in critically ill stem cell transplanted patients. The underlying pathophysiology of poor graft function is not fully understood and currently under investigation. High-risk patients may be identified and ICU treatments stratified according to allogeneic stem cell patients' individual risk profiles. In contrast to previous studies involving medical or surgical ICU patients, the fraction of thrombocytopenic patients was larger and low platelets were a better differentiating factor in multivariate analysis than any other parameter.

Successful treatment of secondary poor graft function post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with eltrombopag

Poor graft function (PGF) is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Current treatment strategies include the use of growth factors, CD34⁺-selected stem cell boost, mesenchymal stem cell transfusion, and second allo-HSCT, but these treatments are not effective in all patients. Eltrombopag, an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist, which showed promising results in severe aplasia anemia, may be an alternative choice for PGF patients. Therefore, we treated 12 patients who responded poorly to standard treatments for secondary PGF after allo-HSCT with eltrombopag. The median duration was 116 (35–1000) days from transplantation to PGF diagnosis and 59 (30–180) days from PGF diagnosis to eltrombopag treatment. Eltrombopag was started at a dose of 25 mg/d for 3 days and then increased to 50 or 75 mg/d. Median treatment duration was 8 (2–23) weeks. Ten patients (83.3%) responded to the treatment: 8 achieved complete response (CR), and the remaining 2 achieved partial response. In the 10 responding subjects, median platelet count was 18 (5–27) × 10⁹/L vs 74 (30–117) × 10⁹/L prior to and after treatment. Neutrophil count was 0.51 (0.28–0.69) × 10⁹/L vs 1.84 (0.78–4.90) × 10⁹/L. Hemoglobin was 88 (63–123) vs 101 (78–134) g/L. In the 8 patients who achieved CR, the time from eltrombopag initiation to achieving CR was 29 (10–49) days; the response lasted until the last follow-up in all 8 CR subjects (10–18 months). The 12-month overall survival rate was 83.3%. There was no treatment-related mortality and no evidence of cataract, thrombosis, or any other grade 3/4 toxicities.