Bone Marrow WT1 Levels in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Myelodysplasia: Clinically Relevant Time Points and 100 Copies Threshold Value

Measurable residual disease assessment prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes: a 20-year monocentric study

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (alloHSCT) can have divergent survival outcomes while all in morphological complete remission (CR). Techniques of measurable residual disease (MRD) have allowed us to refine their prognosis in two categories: MRD-positive and MRD-negative patients. We conducted a monocentric retrospective study (01/2000-12/2020) to assess the prognosis of pretransplant MRD status measured by multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) and molecular biology assessed by PCR. 192 patients were included. The median follow-up period was 77 months. Among patients undergoing alloHSCT in CR, overall survival (median-OS: 130.6 vs. 16.0 months, P < 0.001), disease-free survival (median-DFS: 109.6 vs. 7.1 months, P < 0.001) and cumulative incidence of relapse (12-month CIR: 7.3% vs. 33.7%, P < 0.0001) were significantly different between MRD-negative and MRD-positive patients. Patients with discordant intermethod results had intermediate DFS. MRD-negative patients according to molecular PCR-based techniques, WT1 overexpression and MFC had longer median-DFS, compared to MRD-positive patients (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Looking into subgroups, MRD-positive patients among the ELN2017 adverse-category (P < 0.0001), myeloablative and reduced-intensity conditioning regimens (P < 0.0001, P = 0.005), < 60-year patients (P < 0.001) and AML patients (P < 0.001) were associated with lower DFS. This difference was not found in ≥ 60-year patients (P = 0.27) and MDS patients (P = 0.70). MRD-positive patients within the favorable/intermediate ELN2017 category trended toward lower DFS (P = 0.05). We confirmed that MRD status prior to alloHSCT is a strong prognostic factor for OS, DFS and CIR. Combining MFC and molecular-PCR techniques to assess MRD seems primordial as inter-method discordance can be consequential.

Wilms' tumor gene 1 in hematological malignancies: friend or foe?

Wilms' tumor gene 1 (WT1) is a transcription and post-translational factor that has a crucial role in the biological and pathological processes of several human malignancies. For hematological malignancies, WT1 overexpression or mutation has been found in leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. About 70-90% of acute myeloid leukemia patients showed WT1 overexpression, and 6-15% of patients carried WT1 mutations. WT1 has been widely regarded as a marker for monitoring minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. Many researchers were interested in developing WT1 targeting therapy. In this review, we summarized biological and pathological functions, correlation with other genes and clinical features, prognosis value and targeting therapy of WT1 in hematological features.

Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease-associated Membranous Nephropathy Following Bone Marrow Transplantation, Successfully Treated with Rituximab

A 67-year-old woman who had undergone bone marrow transplantation 2 years previously for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) developed complications of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). She thereafter also developed nephrotic syndrome, and membranous nephropathy (MN) was diagnosed by a renal biopsy. Although the causative antigens of the MN were not detected, immunofluorescence staining showed codominant deposition of immunoglobulins G2 and G3, a finding indicating secondary MN, thereby suggesting an association between MN and cGVHD. Rituximab treatment was initiated, and her nephrotic syndrome gradually improved without relapse of AML. Our present case suggests that rituximab is a safe and effective therapeutic option for cGVHD-associated MN.

The present and future of measurable residual disease testing in acute myeloid leukemia

Considerable progress has been made in the past several years in the scientific understanding of, and available treatments for, acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Achievement of a conventional remission, evaluated cytomorphologically via small bone marrow samples, is a necessary but not sufficient step toward cure. It is increasingly appreciated that molecular or immunophenotypic methods to identify and quantify measurable residual disease (MRD) - populations of leukemia cells below the cytomorphological detection limit - provide refined information on the quality of response to treatment and prediction of the risk of AML recurrence and leukemia-related deaths. The principles and practices surrounding MRD remain incompletely determined however and the genetic and immunophenotypic heterogeneity of AML may prevent a one-sizefits- all approach. Here, we review the current approaches to MRD testing in AML, discuss strengths and limitations, highlight recent technological advances that may improve such testing, and summarize ongoing initiatives to generate the clinical evidence needed to advance the use of MRD testing in patients with AML.

Depth of Response to Intensive Chemotherapy Has Significant Prognostic Value among Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation with Intermediate or Adverse Risk at Diagnosis Compared to At-Risk Group According to European Leukemia Net 2017 Risk Stratification

We evaluated the prognostic efficiency of the European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2017 criteria on the post-transplant outcomes of 174 patients with intermediate (INT; n = 108, 62%) or adverse (ADV) risk (n = 66, 38%) of acute myeloid leukemia; these patients had received the first allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) at remission. After a median follow-up period of 18 months, the 2 year OS, RFS, and CIR after HSCT were estimated to be 58.6% vs. 64.4% (p = 0.299), 50.5% vs. 53.7% (p = 0.533), and 26.9% vs. 36.9% (p = 0.060) in the INT and ADV risk groups, respectively. Compared to the ELN 2017 stratification, pre-HSCT WT1 levels (cutoff: 250 copies/104 ABL) more effectively segregated the post-HSCT outcomes of INT risk patients compared to ADV risk patients regarding their 2 year OS (64.2% vs. 51.5%, p = 0.099), RFS (59.4% vs. 32.4%, p = 0.003), and CIR (18.9% vs. 60.0% p < 0.001). Indeed, high WT1 levels were more prominent in INT risk patients than in ADV risk patients. Notably, FLT3-ITD had the greatest impact on post-HSCT outcomes among all the ELN 2017 criteria components; patients in the FLT3-ITD mutant subgroups exhibited the worst outcomes regardless of their allelic ratios or NPM1 status compared to the pre-HSCT WT1 level of other INT and ADV risk patients.

The Role of Wilms' Tumor Gene (WT1) Expression as a Marker of Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The Minimal Residual Disease(MRD) monitoring in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is crucial to guide treatment after morphologic complete remission, to define the need for consolidation with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT), and to detect impending relapse allowing early intervention. However, more than 50% of patients with AML lack a specific or measurable molecular marker to monitor MRD. We reviewed the key studies on WT1 overexpression as a marker of MRD in AML patients undergoing an intensive chemotherapy program, including Allo-SCT. In addition, we provided some practical considerations on how to properly use WT1 expression as an MRD marker, considering its strengths and weaknesses. In order to achieve the best sensitivity and specificity, it is recommended to refer to the standardized method of European LeukemiaNet and its defined threshold (250 WT1 copies/10⁴ Abelson (ABL) on Bone Marrow-BM and 50 WT1 copies/10⁴ ABL on Peripheral Blood-PB), which has been validated in a large and multicenter cohort of patients and normal controls.

Preemptive Interferon-α Therapy Could Protect Against Relapse and Improve Survival of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Long-Term Results of Two Registry Studies

For allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients, preemptive interferon-α (IFN-α) therapy is considered as a useful method to eliminate the minimal residual disease (MRD). Our purpose is to assess the long-term efficacy of preemptive IFN-α therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients following allo-HSCT based on two registry studies (#NCT02185261 and #NCT02027064). We would present the final data and unpublished results of long-term clinical outcomes with extended follow-up. We adopted polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) to monitor MRD, and a positive result of bone marrow specimen examined by either of them would be identified as the MRD-positive status. Subcutaneous injections of recombinant human IFN-α-2b were performed for 6 cycles, and prolonged IFN-α therapy could be permitted at the request of patients. The median cycles were 3.5 (range, 0.5-30.5) cycles. A total of 9 patients suffered from grade ≥3 toxicities (i.e., infectious: n = 6; hematologic: n = 3). The 6-year cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality following IFN-α therapy were 13.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4-20.6%) and 3.9% (95%CI, 0.0-17.6%), respectively. The probability of disease-free survival at 6 years following IFN-α therapy was 83.1% (95%CI, 75.2-91.9%). The probability of overall survival at 6 years following IFN-α therapy was 88.3% (95%CI, 81.4-95.8%). The cumulative incidences of total chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) and severe cGVHD at 6 years following IFN-α therapy were 66.2% (95%CI, 55.5-77.0%) and 10.4% (95%CI, 3.6-17.2%), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that an alternative donor was associated with a lower risk of relapse and the better disease-free survival. Thus, preemptive IFN-α therapy could clear MRD persistently, prevent relapse truly, and improve long-term survival in AML patients following allo-HSCT.

Early detection of WT1 measurable residual disease identifies high-risk patients, independent of transplantation in AML

Postinduction WT1 measurable residual disease is associated with shorter survival and higher risk of relapse in younger patients with AML.

Postinduction WT1 residual disease is an independent prognostic factor in patients eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

WT1 overexpression is frequently identified in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and has been reported to be a potential marker for monitoring measurable residual disease (MRD). We evaluated the use of postinduction WT1 MRD level as a prognostic factor, as well as the interaction between postinduction WT1 MRD response and the effect of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in the first complete remission (CR). In the ALFA-0702 trial, patients with AML, aged 18 to 59, had a prospective quantification of WT1 MRD. The occurrence of a WT1 MRD ratio >2.5% in bone marrow or >0.5% in peripheral blood was defined as MRD^high, and ratios below these thresholds were defined as MRD^low. The prognostic value of MRD after induction chemotherapy was assessed in 314 patients in first CR by comparing the risk of relapse, the relapse-free survival (RFS), and the overall survival (OS). Interaction between MRD response and the allo-SCT effect was evaluated in patients by comparing the influence of allo-SCT on the outcomes of patients with MRD^high with those with MRD^low. The results showed that patients with MRD^high after induction had a higher risk of relapse and a shorter RFS and OS. The MRD response remained of strong prognostic value in the subset of 225 patients with intermediate-/unfavorable-risk AML who were eligible for allo-SCT, because patients with MRD^high had a significantly higher risk of relapse resulting in worse RFS and OS. The effect of allo-SCT was higher in patients with MRD^low than in those with MRD^high, but not significantly different. The early WT1 MRD response highlights a population of high-risk patients in need of additional therapy.

Measurable residual disease status and outcome of transplant in acute myeloid leukemia in second complete remission: a study by the acute leukemia working party of the EBMT

Measurable residual disease (MRD) prior to hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete morphological remission (CR1) is an independent predictor of outcome, but few studies address CR2. This analysis by the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry assessed HCT outcomes by declared MRD status in a cohort of 1042 adult patients with AML CR2 at HCT. Patients were transplanted 2006–2016 from human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched siblings (n = 719) or HLA 10/10 matched unrelated donors (n = 293). Conditioning was myeloablative (n = 610) or reduced-intensity (n = 432) and 566 patients (54%) had in-vivo T cell depletion. At HCT, 749 patients (72%) were MRD negative (MRD NEG) and 293 (28%) were MRD positive (MRD POS). Time from diagnosis to HCT was longer in MRD NEG than MRD POS patients (18 vs. 16 months (P < 0.001). Two-year relapse rates were 24% (95% CI, 21–28) and 40% (95% CI, 34–46) in MRD NEG and MRD POS groups (P < 0.001), respectively. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 57% (53–61) and 46% (40–52%), respectively (P = 0.001), but there was no difference in terms of overall survival. Prognostic factors for relapse and LFS were MRD NEG status, good risk cytogenetics, and longer time from diagnosis to HCT. In-vivo T cell depletion predicted relapse.

Isoform-specific and signaling-dependent propagation of acute myeloid leukemia by Wilms tumor 1

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is caused by recurrent mutations in members of the gene regulatory and signaling machinery that control hematopoietic progenitor cell growth and differentiation. Here, we show that the transcription factor WT1 forms a major node in the rewired mutation-specific gene regulatory networks of multiple AML subtypes. WT1 is frequently either mutated or upregulated in AML, and its expression is predictive for relapse. The WT1 protein exists as multiple isoforms. For two main AML subtypes, we demonstrate that these isoforms exhibit differential patterns of binding and support contrasting biological activities, including enhanced proliferation. We also show that WT1 responds to oncogenic signaling and is part of a signaling-responsive transcription factor hub that controls AML growth. WT1 therefore plays a central and widespread role in AML biology.

How I treat measurable (minimal) residual disease in acute leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is currently the standard curative treatment of acute leukemia, relapse remains unacceptably high. Measurable (minimal) residual disease (MRD) after allo-HCT may be used as a predictor of impending relapse and should be part of routine follow-up for transplanted patients. Patients with MRD may respond to therapies aiming to unleash or enhance the graft-versus-leukemia effect. However, evidence-based recommendations on how to best implement MRD testing and MRD-directed therapy after allo-HCT are lacking. Here, I describe our institutional approach to MRD monitoring for preemptive MRD-triggered intervention, using patient scenarios to illustrate the discussion.

Pharmacologic Therapies to Prevent Relapse of Acute Myeloid Leukemia After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Relapse is the main cause of mortality in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Adverse cytogenetic or molecular risk factors, as well as refractory disease or persistent measurable residual disease (MRD) at the time of transplantation are associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Salvage therapy for AML relapse after allo-HSCT is often limited to chemotherapy, donor lymphocyte infusions and/or second transplants and is rarely successful. Effective post-transplant preventive intervention in high risk AML may be crucial. The most frequent and promising approach is the use of post-transplant maintenance with hypomethylating agents or with FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors when the target is present. Moreover, IDH1/IDH2 inhibitors and BCL-2 inhibitors in combination with other strategies are promising approaches in the maintenance setting. Here we summarize the current knowledge about the preemptive and prophylactic use of pharmacologic agents after allo-HSCT to prevent relapse of AML.

WT1 Gene Expression in Peripheral Blood Before and After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation is a Clinically Relevant Prognostic Marker in AML - A Single-center 14-year Experience

BACKGROUND

This work summarizes our experience with WT1 monitoring before and after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The expression of WT1 gene was measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction in peripheral blood according to the European Leukemia Net recommendations. Between May 2005 and August 2019, we analyzed 147 consecutive patients with acute myeloid leukemia with high WT1 expression at diagnosis, transplanted in first (CR1) or second (CR2) complete remission.

RESULTS

At the time of allo-HSCT, 107 patients had WT1-normal expression (WT1 ≤ 50 copies), and 40 patients had WT1-high expression. The median follow-up was 21 months. The estimated 5-year overall survival and event-free survival was significantly better in the WT1-normal cohort (65% and 57% vs. 37% and 25%; P = .0003 and P < .0001, respectively) and 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly lower in the WT1-normal group (19% vs. 53%; P < .0001). Five-year non-relapse mortality was not significantly different (20% and 23%). Multivariate analysis revealed WT1-high expression and acute graft-versus-host disease grade 3/4 as significantly negative prognostic factors for OS. Overall, 49 patients developed WT1 molecular relapse in the post-transplant period; in 14 cases, the therapeutic intervention was done. In all but 1 relapsed patient where WT1 minimal residual disease (MRD) was monitored (38 patients), we detected WT1-high levels (sensitivity of 97%).

CONCLUSION

The results of the analysis confirmed our previous experience that WT1 status before allo-HSCT is a strong prognostic factor for both OS and relapse risk. In addition, we confirmed the usefulness of this marker for MRD monitoring after allo-HSCT. The main advantage is the possibility of frequent MRD monitoring in peripheral blood and early bone marrow examination based on WT1-high expression.

WT1 Expression in Peripheral Blood at Diagnosis and During the Course of Early Consolidation Treatment Correlates With Survival in Patients With Intermediate and Poor-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND

Up to 55% of non-APL acute myeloid leukemias (AML) lack a molecular target suitable for standardized disease monitoring. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of WT1 gene expression at early stages of intensive treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 106 consecutive patients with intermediate and high-risk AML who had WT1 expression at diagnosis >500 copies/10⁴ABL and who achieved remission after 1 to 2 cycles of induction treatment were analyzed. WT1 expression was measured in peripheral blood using a standardized European LeukemiaNet method. Overexpression was defined as >50 copies/10⁴ABL. The median follow-up was 30 months.

RESULTS

Patients with normal versus high WT1 expression after 2 cycles of chemotherapy had overall survival (OS) at 3 years of 66% versus 41% (P = .01); event-free survival (EFS) 45% versus 22% (P = .01). Prognostic significance of WT1 expression after 2 cycles of treatment was maintained in the group of patients treated with chemotherapy alone without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in first line treatment (OS 70% vs. 36%, P = .02; EFS 35% vs. 0%, P = .03). Significant prognostic factors for EFS on multivariate analysis were the achievement of molecular remission (<50 copies of WT1) at any time during treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, P = .04) and increased WT1 expression after 2 cycles of chemotherapy (HR 2.0, P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Increased WT1 expression after 2 cycles of chemotherapy is a negative prognostic factor for survival. WT1 remains a valuable molecular marker in AML without any leukemia-specific mutation, especially if next generation sequencing and/or digital polymerase chain reaction are not routinely available.

Comparison of Myeloablative (CyTBI, BuCy) versus Reduced-Intensity (FluBu2TBI400) Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Pretransplant Low WT1 Expression

Relapse is a major concern with reduced-intensity conditioning. We analyzed 257 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) and fulfilled the following criteria: intermediate- or poor-risk disease by National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (2017, version 3), in first complete remission (CR1) at SCT, received either myeloablative conditioning (MAC; busulfan plus cyclophosphamide or cyclophosphamide plus total body irradiation) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC; FluBu2TBI400) peripheral blood SCT from 8/8 matched sibling or unrelated donor, and having bone marrow Wilms tumor gene 1 (WT1) expression results before transplant. We and other groups serially published a predictive value for pretransplant WT1 expression in patients with AML to identify patients at higher risk of relapse. Among the total 257 patients, 191 (74.3%) and 66 (25.7%) patients received MAC and RIC transplants, respectively. WT1 ≥250 copies/10⁴ABL was defined as WT1^high. WT1^high before SCT was found to be an independent prognostic factor for inferior overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). There were 201 patients with WT1 low expression based upon pretransplant analysis. There was no significant difference in OS, DFS, CIR, and nonrelapse mortality between MAC and RIC patients. To conclude, post-transplant survival or relapse was not different by conditioning intensity in AML CR1 patients whose WT1 level was below 250 copies per 10⁴ABL at transplantation.

Application of a digital PCR method for WT1 to myeloid neoplasms in CR and deep ELN WT1 molecular response (< 10 copies)

Bone marrow WT1 mRNA levels assessed by the ELN method are useful to establish prognostic correlations in myeloid malignancies treated with chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Those patients with WT1 levels below ten copies have a good outcome. However, some of these patients relapse. To further characterize this group of cases, we applied a new and sensitive digital (ddPCR) WT1 method. A consecutive series of 49 patients with treated myeloid malignancies and with an ELN WT1 quantitation of < 10 copies were included in the study. All cases (47 AML and 2 MDS) have received intensive chemotherapy or HCT. One to four micrograms of total RNA were retrotranscribed to obtain ≥ 10,000 ABL1 copies using the ELN protocol. Only those cases with a good quality cDNA were used in the ddPCR WT1 test. The ddPCR Gene Expression WT1 Assay of Bio-Rad© was used to perform the PCR amplification, and the microdroplets were quantified in the Bio-Rad's QX200 droplet reader. Eighteen patients showed a negative WT1 ddPCR assay (0 copies/μl), whereas 31 cases were positive (results ranged from 1 to 15.2 copies/μl). Survival analysis showed statistically significant differences in terms of OS between both groups, 83 ± 8% vs. 46 ± 9% (p = 0.024). A statistically significant correlation was also found between ddPCRWT1 results and CD123+ cell number detected by flow cytometry (p = 0.024). Larger series of patients tested with the current ddPCRWT1 method will solve whether it could be used to stratify patients with myeloid malignancies achieving deep WT1 molecular response (< 10 copies).

Strategies for minimal residual disease detection: current perspectives

Currently, the post-remission treatment in acute leukemia is based on the genetic profile of leukemic cells at diagnosis (ie, FLT3 ITD positivity) and on the level of measurable residual disease (MRD) after induction and consolidation chemotherapy. Two methods are currently preferred for MRD evaluation in many centers: multiparameter flow cytometry and real-time quantitative PCR. Additional methods such as next-generation sequencing and digital PCR are under investigation, in an attempt to increase the sensitivity and thus allowing the detection of small clones. Many studies suggest that MRD positivity after chemotherapy is associated with negative prognosis, and the reappearance of MRD during follow-up allows impending relapse to be identified and consequently enables early intervention. Finally, MRD positivity before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is predictive of the outcome. Although the significance of MRD in acute leukemia has been widely explored, the assessment of molecular MRD is not yet a routine practice. In this review, we describe the significance of MRD in different settings and the main markers and methods used for MRD detection.

Subgroup Analysis Can Optimize the Relapse-Prediction Cutoff Value for WT1 Expression After Allogeneic Hematologic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

High WT1 expression after allogeneic hematologic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) can strongly predict relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the cutoff values obtained have been inconsistent. Precise cutoff values may be optimized through subtype analysis; the RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion transcript provides an ideal reference. RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and WT1 transcript levels were simultaneously measured in 1299 bone marrow samples serially collected from 176 t(8;21) AML patients after allo-HSCT. The upper limit of the normal bone marrow WT1 level was 0.6%, which we previously reported to be the cutoff value for significant relapse prediction in AML as a whole. WT1 cutoff values of 0.6%, 1.2%, and 1.8% significantly differentiated patients in relapse after allo-HSCT. Nonetheless, patients with WT1 levels of 0.6% to 1.2% and those with levels of >1.2% and 1.8% after HSCT had rates of cumulative incidence of relapse similar to those with a continuous WT1 level of ≤0.6%, and both were significantly lower than that in patients with a WT1 level of >1.8%. WT1 expression was significantly related to RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcript levels at WT1 levels of >1.8% but not at levels of 0.6% to 1.2% or >1.2% to 1.8%. Therefore, subgroup analysis can optimize the relapse-prediction cutoff value of WT1 expression. A cutoff level of 1.8% more accurately differentiates t(8;21) AML patients in relapse after allo-HSCT than does a cutoff level of 0.6%.

Quality of Response in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The Role of Minimal Residual Disease

In the acute myeloid leukemia (AML) setting, research has extensively investigated the existence and relevance of molecular biomarkers, in order to better tailor therapy with newly developed agents and hence improve outcomes and/or save the patient from poorly effective therapies. In particular, in patients with AML, residual disease after therapy does reflect the sum of the contributions of all factors associated with diagnosis and post-diagnosis resistance. The evaluation of minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) can be considered as a key tool to guide patient’s management and a promising endpoint for clinical trials. In this narrative review, we discuss MRD evaluation as biomarker for tailored therapy in AML patients; we briefly report current evidence on the use of MRD in clinical practice, and comment on the potential ability of MRD in the assessment of the efficacy of new molecules.

[The effect of WT1 expression on the prognosis of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute leukemia]

Objective: To study the effect of WT1 expression on the prognosis of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in acute leukemia (AL) and its significance as molecular marker to dynamically monitor minimal residual disease (MRD) . Methods: Retrospectively analyzed those AL patients who underwent allo-HSCT in the First Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine during Jan 2016 to Dec 2017, a total number of 314 cases, 163 males and 151 females, median age was 30 (9-64) years old. Comparing the difference of WT1 expression at diagnosed, pre-HSCT and after HSCT. Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the WT1 threshold at different time so as to predict relapse. The threshold of WT1 expression before transplantation was 1.010%, within 3 months after HSCT was 0.079% and 6 months after HSCT was 0.375%. According to these thresholds, WT1 positive patients were divided into low expression groups and high expression groups. Analyzed the relationship between overall survival (OS) , disease-free survival (DFS) , cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and WT1 expression. Results: The OS and DFS of high expression group pre-HSCT were lower than low expression group [69.2% (9/13) vs 89.1% (57/64) , χ(2)=4.086, P=0.043; 53.8% (7/13) vs 87.5% (56/64) , χ(2)=9.766, P=0.002], CIR was higher than low expression group [30.8% (4/13) vs 7.8% (5/64) , P=0.017]. There was no significant difference of OS and DFS between high expression and low expression group of 3 months after HSCT (P=0.558, P=0.269) . The OS and DFS of high expression group of 6 months after transplantation were both lower than low expression group (P=0.049, P=0.035) . Multivariate analysis showed that WT1>0.375% when 6 months after transplantation was the only independent prognostic factor for shorter DFS (P=0.022) . There was no statistically significant difference in CIR between the high-expression group and the low-expression group 3 months after transplantation and 6 months after transplantation (P=0.114, P=0.306) . Conclusion: High expression of WT1 before and after HSCT was an adverse prognosis factor. It is of clinical practical value to use WT1 as a transplant recommendation index for patients with acute leukemia and as a marker to monitor MRD dynamically.

Measurable residual disease, conditioning regimen intensity, and age predict outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: A registry analysis of 2292 patients by the Acute Leukemia Working Party European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in morphological first complete remission (CR1) pre-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) may have measurable residual disease (MRD) by molecular and immunophenotyping criteria. We assessed interactions of MRD status with HCT conditioning regimen intensity in patients aged <50 years (y) or ≥50y. This was a retrospective study by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. Patients were >18y with AML CR1 MRD NEG/POS and recipients of HCT in 2000-2015. Conditioning regimens were myeloablative (MAC), reduced intensity (RIC) or non-myeloablative (NMA). Outcomes included leukemia free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), chronic graft-vs-host (cGVHD), and GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS). The 2292 eligible patients were categorized into four paired groups: <50y MRD POS MAC (N = 240) vs RIC/NMA (N = 58); <50y MRD NEG MAC (N = 665) vs RIC/NMA (N = 195); ≥50y MRD POS MAC (N = 126) vs RIC/NMA (N = 230), and ≥50y MRD NEG MAC (N = 223) vs RIC/NMA (N = 555). In multivariate analysis RIC/NMA was only inferior to MAC for patients in the <50y MRD POS group, with worse RI (HR 1.71) and LFS (HR 1.554). Patients <50Y MRD NEG had less cGVHD after RIC/NMA HCT (HR 0.714). GRFS was not significantly affected by conditioning intensity in any group. Patients aged <50y with AML CR1 MRD POS status should preferentially be offered MAC allo-HCT. Prospective studies are needed to address whether patients with AML CR1 MRD NEG may be spared the toxicity of MAC regimens. New approaches are needed for ≥50y AML CR1 MRD POS.

Outcomes of Measurable Residual Disease in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia before and after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: Validation of Difference from Normal Flow Cytometry with Chimerism Studies and Wilms Tumor 1 Gene Expression

We enrolled 150 patients in a prospective multicenter study of children with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to compare the detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) by a "difference from normal" flow cytometry (ΔN) approach with assessment of Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) gene expression without access to the diagnostic specimen. Prospective analysis of the specimens using this approach showed that 23% of patients screened for HSCT had detectable residual disease by ΔN (.04% to 53%). Of those patients who proceeded to transplant as being in morphologic remission, 10 had detectable disease (.04% to 14%) by ΔN. The disease-free survival of this group was 10% (0 to 35%) compared with 55% (46% to 64%, P < .001) for those without disease. The ΔN assay was validated using the post-HSCT specimen by sorting abnormal or suspicious cells to confirm recipient or donor origin by chimerism studies. All 15 patients who had confirmation of tumor detection relapsed, whereas the 2 patients with suspicious phenotype cells lacking this confirmation did not. The phenotype of the relapse specimen was then used retrospectively to assess the pre-HSCT specimen, allowing identification of additional samples with low levels of MRD involvement that were previously undetected. Quantitative assessment of WT1 gene expression was not predictive of relapse or other outcomes in either pre- or post-transplant specimens. MRD detected by ΔN was highly specific, but did not identify most relapsing patients. The application of the assay was limited by poor quality among one-third of the specimens and lack of a diagnostic phenotype for comparison.

Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Monitoring measurable (minimal) residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has greatly increased our ability to assess chemosensisitivity to treatment as well as the duration of treatment responses. There is strong evidence to support its prognostic value for long-term outcomes at different time points and across assays and targets. It's role as a surrogate endpoint to define risk-adapted strategies is still under evaluation. In this chapter, we will discuss the definition of MRD in AML, the potential contribution of leukemia stem cells (LSCs) to MRD and we will review all the current approaches to assess residual disease including the 2018 European Leukemia Network (ELN) working group recommendations for MRD standardization in AML. In addition, a summary of MRD studies associated to prognosis will be described.