Cord Haploidentical Non-In Vitro T Cell Depletion Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Reduces Relapse of Refractory Acute Leukemia

Haplo-cord transplant. Realizing the potential of umbilical cord blood grafts. - A review of techniques and analysis of outcomes

The combination of cord blood transplant with progenitor cells from partially HLA-matched adult donors (haplo-cord transplant) has been used over the past two decades. In Europe and the US the adult donor graft is CD34 selected and provides early hematopoiesis, but durable engraftment derives from the cord blood graft (CD34 selected haplo-cord). Neutrophil recovery is prompt and rates of acute and chronic GVHD are low. Recent Chinese studies combine cord blood grafts with T-replete haplo-identical grafts (unmodified haplo-cord). The haplo graft usually establishes dominance and UCB chimerism is rarely detected. Comparison studies suggest considerably decreased rates of relapse and improved outcomes, compared with either haplo-identical transplant or CBU transplant, particularly in patients with advanced leukemia. A recent prospective randomized study confirms this. Haplo-cord mitigates the engraftment delay of UCB transplant. The unique biology of UCB grafts results in low GVHD and improved GVL especially beneficial in high-risk disease.

Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation with or without an unrelated cord blood unit for adult acute myeloid leukemia: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial

Coinfusion of unrelated cord blood (UCB) units in haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) (haplo-cord HCT) for hematopoietic malignancies showed promising results in previous reports, but the efficiency of haplo-cord HCT in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) still lacks sufficient evidence. This multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03719534) aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of haplo-cord HCT in AML patients. A total of 268 eligible patients aged 18-60 years, diagnosed with measurable residual disease in AML (excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia), with available haploidentical donors and suitable for allotransplantation, were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive haplo-cord HCT (n = 134) or haplo-HCT (n = 134). The 3-year overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint in this study. Overall median follow-up was 36.50 months (IQR 24.75-46.50). The 3-year OS of Haplo-cord HCT group was better than haplo-HCT group (80.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 73.7-87.9 vs. 67.8% 95% CI 60.0-76.5, p = 0.013). Favorable progression-free survival (70.3%, 95% CI 62.6-78.8 vs. 57.6%, 95% CI 49.6-67.0, p = 0.012) and cumulative incidence of relapse (12.1%, 95% CI 12.0-12.2 vs. 30.3%, 95% CI 30.1-30.4, p = 0.024) were observed in haplo-cord HCT group. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) within two years posttransplantation in the two groups were similar. Haplo-cord HCT patients exhibited a faster cumulative incidence of neutrophil recovery (p = 0.026) and increased T-cell reconstitution in the early period posttransplantation. Haplo-cord HCT can improve OS in AML patients without excessive AEs, which may exert additional benefits for recipients of haplo-HCT.

Haploidentical Cord Blood Transplantation with 8 mg/kg Antithymocyte Globulin as Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis Compared to Haploidentical Transplantation with 10 mg/kg Antithymocyte Globulin in the Treatment of Acute Leukemia

Clinical outcomes of the transplantation strategy combined with a haploidentical stem cell graft and an unrelated umbilical cord blood unit (haplo-cord HSCT) with low-dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for the treatment of acute leukemia remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the clinical outcomes of haplo-cord HSCT in acute leukemia patients with the GVHD prevention strategy of 8 mg/kg ATG compared with haploidentical transplantation with 10 mg/kg ATG. A total of 130 patients with acute leukemia who underwent allogeneic HSCT between January 2016 and December 2020 were included in this study, including 70 patients who received haploidentical stem cell grafts and unrelated umbilical cord blood units (haplo-cord HSCT) with 8 mg/kg ATG (haplo-cord-ATG8 group) and haploidentical HSCT with 10 mg/kg ATG (haplo-ATG10 group) in 60 patients. Clinical data were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Patients in the haplo-cord-ATG8 group were significantly older compared with the haplo-ATG10 group (P = .000). Haplo-cord HSCT with reduced ATG to 8 mg/kg results in more rapid neutrophil recovery (P = .036). No between-group differences were observed in platelet recovery or the incidences of Epstein-Barr virus viremia, bloodstream infection, or hemorrhagic cystitis. The rate of grade II-IV acute GVHD by day 100 post-transplantation was higher in the haplo-ATG10 group (27.16% versus 11.48%; P = .033), as was the rate of chronic GVHD at 1 year (14.60% versus 3.36%; P = .048). The rate of cytomegalovirus reaction was higher in the haplo-ATG10 group (48.31% versus 26.30%; P = .022). With a median follow-up of 27.4 months for the haplo-cord-ATG8 group and 27.5 months for the haplo-ATG10 group, overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 79.4% versus 62.8% (P = .005), event-free survival (EFS) was 76.3% versus 55.9% (P = .001), the cumulative incidence of relapse was 10.11% versus 25.97% (P = .164), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 14.33% versus 24.43% (P = .0040). Multivariate analysis identified Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Disease Risk Index was the sole significant predictor of relapse, NRM, OS, and EFS. Haplo-cord HSCT supported by cord blood with 8 mg/kg ATG as GVHD prophylaxis results in better outcomes compared with haplo-HSCT with 10 mg/kg ATG.

Haplo-Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Plus Cord Blood Grafts for Hematologic Malignancies Might Lead to Lower Relapse Compared with Haplo-Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Plus Bone Marrow Grafts

To compare the outcomes between peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC)+cord blood and PBSC+bone marrow (BM) grafts in the setting of haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation, 110 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study, including 54 recipients of haplo-PBSC+cord transplants and 56 recipients of haplo-PBSC+BM transplants. Chimerism analyses revealed that by day 30 post-transplantation, 94.3% of surviving patients in the haplo-PBSC+cord group had achieved full haploidentical chimerism and 5.7% had <10% cord chimerism, whereas 100% of surviving patients in the haplo-PBSC+BM group had achieved full donor chimerism. The cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment at 30 days was 92.6% in the haplo-PBSC+cord group versus 89.3% in the haplo-PBSC+BM group (P =.024), that of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 100 days was 31.5% versus 48.2% (P =.060), and 1-year relapse was 13.0% versus 25.0% (P =.027), nonrelapse mortality was 9.3% versus 12.5% (P =.76), disease-free survival (DFS) was 77.7% versus 62.5% (P =.028), and overall survival (OS) was 81.4% versus 69.6% (P =.046). Multivariate analysis identified haplo-PBSC+cord transplantation as a protective factor for relapse (hazard ratio [HR], .31; P =.007), DFS (HR, .40; P =.007), and OS (HR, .44; P =.016). Overall, haplo-PBSC+cord transplantation led to faster platelet engraftment, lower relapse, and superior DFS and OS compared with haplo-PBSC+BM transplantation and thus might be a better transplant mode in the setting of HID transplantation.

Association between haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation combined with an umbilical cord blood unit and graft-versus-host disease in pediatric patients with acquired severe aplastic anemia

Background:

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) based on granulocyte colony-stimulating factor plus anti-thymocyte regimens (‘Beijing Protocol’) provides a salvage treatment for patients of acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA) in China. However, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major impediment of haplo-HSCT due to human leukocyte antigen disparity. Recently, haplo-HSCT combined with umbilical cord blood (UCB) (haplo-cord HSCT) is performed in clinical trials to potentially reduce the risk of severe GVHD. Nevertheless, studies comparing GVHD in pediatric patients receiving haplo and haplo-cord HSCT for SAA are limited.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of UCB co-infusion on GVHD in pediatric patients receiving haplo-HSCT for SAA.

Design:

We conducted a retrospective study of 91 consecutive SAA children undergoing haploidentical transplantation based on the ‘Beijing Protocol’ with or without co-infusion of UCB in our center.

Methods:

All patients received uniform non-myeloablative conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis. We compared baseline characteristics and transplant outcomes between the haplo (n = 35) and haplo-cord (n = 56) recipients.

Results:

All 91 patients achieved hematopoietic recovery from haploidentical donors, with a higher incidence of peri-engraftment syndrome observed with the haplo-cord group as compared with the haplo group (75.0% versus 48.6%, p = 0.029). Notably, the haplo-cord group showed a lower incidence of II–IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) than the haplo group (16.1% versus 42.9%, p = 0.002). Observed incidences of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and moderate to severe cGVHD in the haplo-cord group were also lower than that in the haplo group (25.6% versus 51.3%, p = 0.019; 16.2% versus 41.3%, p = 0.016, respectively). Haplo-cord HSCT was identified as the only factor associated with a lower incidence of II–IV aGVHD and cGVHD in multivariate analysis. However, no differences were observed between the two groups for infections and survival outcomes.

Conclusion:

Our data indicated that co-infusion of UCB in ‘Beijing Protocol’-based haplo-HSCT may be effective for reducing the risk of severe GVHD in SAA children.

Unrelated umbilical cord blood can improve the prognosis of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Background

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) is widely used as a curative treatment strategy for most types of hematological diseases. However, strategies for enhancing the graft versus leukemia (GVL) effect without aggravating the graft versus host disease (GVHD) effect are still being pursued.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed to compare the outcomes between combined unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB-haplo HSCT) and haplo HSCT.

Results

The results showed that neither acute GVHD (aGVHD) nor chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was increased in the UCB-haplo HSCT group, and the engraftment and infection rates were similar between the two groups. However, overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly improved, while transplantation-related mortality and relapse were significantly decreased in the UCB-haplo HSCT group by both univariate and multivariate analyses.

Conclusion

Our results indicated that the addition of a UCB unit could improve the prognosis of haplo-HSCT and enhance the GVL effect without increasing the incidence of GVHD.

Trial registration

The cohort study was retrospectively registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn as ChiCTR2100046681.

Comparison of Outcomes of Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Supported by Third-Party Cord Blood Versus Human Leukocyte Antigen-Matched Sibling Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Hematologic Malignancy Patients

Recent studies have shown that haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation supported by third-party cord blood (haplo-cord-HSCT) results in rapid hematopoietic recovery, low incidences of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and relapse of hematologic malignancies. However, few reports on haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation supported by third-party cord blood (haplo-cord-PBSCT) have been published. To evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent haplo-cord-PBSCT or human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (MSD-PBSCT), we retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent haplo-cord-PBSCT (n = 93) or MSD-PBSCT (n = 72) in our hospital from March 2017 to December 2020. In the haplo-cord-PBSCT and MSD-PBSCT groups, the median time for neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 13 vs. 12 days (p = 0.07) and 16 vs. 13 days (p = 0.06), respectively. The 30-day cumulative incidences of neutrophil engraftment were 100.0% and 98.6% (p = 0.12). The 100-day cumulative incidences of platelet engraftment were 96.8% and 98.6% (p = 0.01). The 100-day cumulative incidences of grade II–IV and grade III–IV acute GVHD were 29.1% vs. 23.6% (p = 0.42) and 9.7% vs. 4.2% (p = 0.18). The cumulative incidences of total and moderate/severe chronic GVHD at 1 year were 26.5% vs. 17.4% and 8.1% vs. 4.5%, respectively, and at 3 years were 34.7% vs. 34.3% (p = 0.60) and 13.6% vs. 10.6% (p = 0.49), respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse at 1 year were 9.3% and 7.2% and at 3 years were 17.0% and 17.0% (p = 0.98). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year was 14.6% and 8.6% and at 3 years was 17.4% and 8.6% (p = 0.13) in two groups. The probabilities of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) at 1 year were 81.7% vs. 88.6%, 76.1% vs. 84.2%, and 71.7% vs. 79.7%, respectively, and at 3 years were 78.7% vs. 79.0%, 65.6% vs. 74.4%, and 55.5% vs. 63.6%, respectively, in the corresponding group, p > 0.05. In conclusion, for patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS) and acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL), haplo-cord-PBSCT results in similar outcomes compared with MSD-PBSCT, and it may be a valid alternative transplantation method.

Comparison of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant With or Without Unrelated Cord Blood Infusion in Severe Aplastic Anemia: Outcomes of a Multicenter Study

The purpose of this study in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients was to compare the feasibility and efficacy of haploidentical hematological stem cell transplantation combined with a single unrelated cord blood (UCB) infusion (Haplo-cord-HSCT) or haplo-identical HSCT (Haplo-HSCT) alone. The five-year graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free or failure-free survival (GFFS) was similar between the two groups (72.4 ± 3.4% vs. 65.4 ± 5.2%, P = 0.178); however, the five-year overall survival (OS) was more favorable in the Haplo-cord-HSCT group than that in the Haplo-HSCT group (84.0 ± 2.8% vs. 72.6 ± 4.9%, P = 0.022), as was transplantation-related mortality (16.4% vs. 27.4%, P = 0.039). Multivariate analysis showed that Haplo-cord HSCT was the only independent determinant of increased OS (P = 0.013). Explorative subgroup analysis showed that only an Human leukocyte antigen-A (HLA-A) allele match between UCB and the recipient was a beneficial factor for GFFS in the Haplo-cord-HSCT group (P = 0.011). In the haplo-cord with an HLA-A match (n = 139) or mismatch (n = 32) or Haplo-HSCT groups, a haplo-cord HLA-A allele match was associated with lower I-IV and III-IV acute GVHD. The haplo-cord with an HLA-A match subgroup also had higher five-year OS than the Haplo-HSCT group (85.4 ± 3.0% vs. 72.6 ± 4.9%, P = 0.013), and higher five-year GFFS than the Haplo-cord HLA-A allele mismatch subgroup (76.2 ± 3.6% vs. 56.3 ± 8.8%, P = 0.011). These findings suggest that the coinfusion of a single UCB potentially improves survival of Haplo-HSCT in SAA patients and that an HLA-A allele-matched UCB is the preferred option.

Sequential Transplantation of Haploidentical Stem Cell and Unrelated Cord Blood With Using ATG/PTCY Increases Survival of Relapsed/Refractory Hematologic Malignancies

Allogeneic haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) and unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation(UCBT)are used in patients lacking HLA-identical sibling or unrelated donors. With myeloablative condition and GVHD prophylaxis of using low-dose ATG and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY), we conducted a prospective clinical trial. Of eligible 122 patients from February 2015 to December 2019 in the study, 113 patients were involved. Forty-eight patients were in the group of sequential haplo-cord transplantation (haplo-cord HSCT), and 65 patients were in the group of single UCBT. The primary endpoint of 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) was no statistical difference between groups (64.1 vs. 56.5%), p>0.05. The analysis of subgroup patients with relapsed/refractory showed haplo-cord HSCT was associated with better OS (HR 0.348, 95% CI, 0.175–0.691; p=0.0025), DFS (HR 0.402, 95% CI, 0.208–0.779; p=0.0069), and GRFS (HR 0.235, 95% CI, 0.120–0.457, p<0.0001) compared to the single cord group. The 2-year’s probability in OS, DFS, and GRFS was 64.9 vs. 31.6%, 64.5 vs. 31.6%, and 60.8 vs. 15.0% in the haplo-cord group and single cord group, respectively. III-IV acute GVHD 8.3 vs. 6.2%, chronic GVHD 25.8 vs. 13.7%, and extensive chronic GVHD 5.3 vs. 1.8% were shown in corresponding group, p>0.05. The patients engrafted persistently with UCB showed better survival outcomes. Our sequential Haplo-cord HSCT with ATG/PTCY improved the survival of patients and might be an alternative transplantation approach for patients with relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies.

CMV Infection and CMV-Specific Immune Reconstitution Following Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation: An Update

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) has advanced to a common procedure for treating patients with hematological malignancies and immunodeficiency diseases. However, cure is seriously hampered by cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections and delayed immune reconstitution for the majority of haploidentical transplant recipients compared to HLA-matched stem cell transplantation. Three major approaches, including in vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) using antithymocyte globulin for haploSCT (in vivo TCD-haploSCT), ex vivo TCD using CD34 + positive selection for haploSCT (ex vivo TCD-haploSCT), and T-cell replete haploSCT using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy-haploSCT), are currently used worldwide. We provide an update on CMV infection and CMV-specific immune recovery in this fast-evolving field. The progress made in cellular immunotherapy of CMV infection after haploSCT is also addressed. Groundwork has been prepared for the creation of personalized avenues to enhance immune reconstitution and decrease the incidence of CMV infection after haploSCT.

MRD abnormal expression predict poor outcomes for refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

We retrospectively analyzed data from 197 patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (r/rAML) who underwent allo‐HCT between January 2013 and February 2020 in our center (patients with promyelocytic leukemia were excluded). Of all patients, 86 achieved a complete morphological remission (CR) before transplant, while 111 failed to do so (NR). In the CR group, 32 patients displayed minimal residual disease (MRD‐positive). According to their immunophenotype pre‐HCT, we divided the MRD‐positive group and NR group into three subgroups: MRD 0+ group (without any antigen abnormal expression of CD7+, CD56+, CD38−, or HLA‐DR−) 28 patients, MRD 1+ group (with one abnormal antigen expression of CD7+, CD56+, CD38−, or HLA‐DR−) 63 patients, MRD 2+ group (with two or more abnormal antigens expression of CD7+, CD56+, CD38‐, or HLA‐DR‐) 52 patients. 3‐year estimates of disease‐free survival (DFS) for MRD 0+, MRD 1+ and MRD 2+ patients were 59.5 ± 9.5%, 29.9 ± 6.1%, and 9.4 ± 5.1%, and 3‐year estimates of overall survival (OS) were 59.5 ± 9.5%, 34.5 ± 6.3%, and 14.5 ± 10.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis adjusted for genetic risk, blast cell level, secondary disease, age, sex, and donor relationship pre‐HCT, the hazard ratios of abnormal expression of CD7+, CD56+, HLA‐DR−, and CD38^‐ were 6.69 (range 2.08–21.52; p = 0.001) for DFS, 2.24 (range 1.21–4.14; p = 0.010) for OS, and 7.18 (range 2.23–23.10; p = 0.001) for relapse compared with CD7−, CD56−, HLA‐DR+, and CD38+ patients. Our finding suggested that abnormal expression of CD7+, CD56+, HLA‐DR−, and CD38− is associated with poor outcomes, and the more number of abnormal antigens expression predict worse outcomes.

Haploidentical vs haplo-cord transplant in adults under 60 years receiving fludarabine and melphalan conditioning

Haplo-identical transplant with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (haplo) and umbilical cord blood transplant supported by third-party CD34 cells (haplo-cord) are competing approaches to alternative donor transplant. We compared, in adults younger than age 60 years, the outcomes of 170 haplo at 1 institution with that of 137 haplo-cord at 2 other institutions. All received reduced intensity conditioning with fludarabine and melphalan ± total body irradiation. GVHD prophylaxis for haplo consisted of cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate, whereas haplo-cord received antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate. Haplo transplant used mostly bone marrow, and peripheral blood stem cells were used in haplo-cord transplants. Haplo-cord were older and had more advanced disease. Haplo-cord hastened median time to neutrophil (11 vs 18 days, P = .001) and platelet recovery (22 vs 25 days, P = .03). At 4 years, overall survival (OS) was 50% for haplo-cord vs 49% for haplo. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 40% for haplo-cord vs 45% for haplo. In multivariate analysis, the disease risk index was significant for OS (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-2.17; P = .00) and PFS. Total body irradiation was associated with decreased recurrence and improved PFS, age >40 with increased nonrelapse mortality. The type of transplant had no effect on OS, PFS, relapse, or nonrelapse mortality. Cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) by day 100 was 16% after haplo-cord vs 33% after haplo (P < .0001), but grade 3-4 GVHD was similar. Chronic GVHD at 1 year was 4% after haplo-cord vs 16% after haplo (P < .0001). Haplo or haplo-cord results in similar and encouraging outcomes. Haplo-cord is associated with more rapid neutrophil and platelet recovery and lower acute and chronic GVHD. Institutional review board authorization for this retrospective study was obtained at each institution. Some patients participated in trials registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01810588 and NCT01050946.