Limitation in Patient-Reported Function Is Associated with Inferior Survival in Older Adults Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Frailty assessment in adults undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: insights from a multicenter GETH-TC study to optimize outcomes and care

Introduction

This multicenter prospective study sponsored by the Grupo Español de Transplante Hematopoyético y Terapia Celular (GETH-TC) explores the use of frailty assessments in allo-HCT candidates.

Methods

Frailty was measured using the HCT Frailty Scale at first consultation and HCT admission in 404 adults from 15 HCT programs in Spain. Based on the results, patients were classified into fit, pre-frail and frail categories. Allo-HCT outcomes were analyzed according to the results obtained from the HCT Frailty Scale. Data was collected prospectively and all patients signed informed consent.

Results

At first consultation, 102 (26.2%) patients were classified as fit, 248 (61.4%) as pre-frail, and 50 (12.4%) as frail. During the study, 62 (15.2%) patients participated in a pre-habilitation program. Among non-pre-habilitated patients (n=342), the proportion of fit patients decreased from 26.6% to 16.7%, while frail patients increased from 12.7% to 19.9%. In contrast, pre-habilitated patients (n=62) showed improvements, with fit patients increasing from 24.2% to 46.8%, and frail patients decreasing from 9.7% to 3.2%. Multivariate analysis confirmed lower OS (HR 2.52, P=0.002) and higher NRM (HR 2.69, P=0.013) in frail patients at HCT admission compared to fit ones, with a trend towards lower OS in pre-frail patients (HR 1.54, P=0.097).

Conclusion

This study highlights the feasibility of incorporating the HCT Frailty Scale into clinical practice, confirms its negative impact of frailty on transplant outcomes, and suggests that frailty is dynamic and potentially reversible through pre-transplant interventions.

Health professionals' perceptions of prehabilitation before haematopoietic cell transplantation to optimise candidacy in older adults

PURPOSE

Haematologic malignancies for the most part are diseases of the elderly. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only potentially curative strategy for many patients but carries substantial morbidity and mortality risks, particularly in frail or co-morbid patients. Pre-transplant optimisation of key targets through prehabilitation may have significant clinical impact.

METHODS

We utilised qualitative methodology (semi-structured interviews) to gain insights and understanding of the perceptions of medical, nursing and allied health professionals towards prehabilitation before haematopoietic cell transplantation to optimise candidacy in older adults. Thematic analysis was performed using a qualitative descriptive approach completed in duplicate by two researchers.

RESULTS

Between August and October 2023, eleven health professionals participated from four large cancer centres across the island of Ireland (n = 3 consultant haematologists, n = 7 specialist haematology nurses and n = 1 senior haematology physiotherapist). Four major themes were identified. The themes comprehensive biopsychosocial care and increasing demand for transplant in older patients highlight the unique challenges impacting older adults who receive HSCT. The multimodality pathways of care theme highlights the heterogeneity of treatment pathways across different clinical sites and disease types. This has implications for the prehabilitation: logistics and benefits theme, which indicated strong support for prehabilitation but emphasised that implementation must consider national reach and context.

CONCLUSIONS

There is broad national multidisciplinary interest in the development of prehabilitation programmes for patients being considered for transplant. Our results will inform the development of services in this area in consideration of national reach, malignancy-specific pathways and the unique factors associated with older age.

Assessment of Mobility Trajectories Using Wearable Inertial Sensors During Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to characterize mobility patterns using wearable inertial sensors and serial assessment across autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (autoHCT) and investigate the relation between mobility and perceived function in patients with hematologic cancer.

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study.

SETTING

Hospital adult transplant clinic followed by discharge.

PARTICIPANTS

78 patients with hematological cancer receiving autoHCT.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mobility was measured across 3 clinical phases (pretransplant, pre-engraftment, and post-engraftment) in using inertial sensors worn during prescribed performance tests in the hospital. Perceived function was assessed using validated provider-reported (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] Performance Status Scale) and patient-reported [European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ-C30]) measures. Trajectories of 5 selected mobility characteristics (turn duration, gait speed, stride time variability, double support time, and heel strike angle) across the clinical phases were also evaluated using piecewise linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

Using Principal Components Analysis, 4 mobility patterns were identified pretransplant: Gait Limitation, Sagittal Sway, Coronal Sway, and Balance Control. Gait Limitation measured pretransplant was significantly inversely associated with perceived function reported by the provider- (β = -0.11; 95% CI: -0.19, -0.02) and patient- (β = -4.85; 95% CI: -7.72, -1.99) post-engraftment in age-adjusted linear regression models. Mobility characteristics demonstrated immediate declines early pre-engraftment with stabilization by late pre-engraftment.

CONCLUSION

Patients with hematological cancer experiencing gait limitations pretransplant are likely to have worse perceived function post-engraftment. Mobility declines in early phases post-transplant and may not fully recover, indicating an opportunity for timely rehabilitation referrals. Wearable inertial sensors can be used to identify early mobility problems and patients who may be at risk for future functional decline who may be candidates for early physical rehabilitation.

Transplantation and Cellular Therapy for Older Adults-The MSK Approach

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hematologic malignances more commonly affect older individuals and often present with advanced, higher risk disease than younger patients. Allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation is well-established treatment modalities with curative potential following either frontline treatments for these diseases or salvage therapy in the relapsed or refractory setting. More recently, novel cellular immunotherapy such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has been shown to lead to high response rate and durable remission in many patients with advanced blood cancers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Given unique characteristics of older patients, how best to deliver these higher-intensity and time sensitive treatment modalities for them remains challenging. Moreover, their short-term and potential long-term impact on their functional status, cognitive status, and quality of life may be significant considerations for many older patients. All these issues contributed to the lack of access and significant underutilization of these potential curative treatment strategies. In this review, we present up to date evidence to support potential benefits of transplantation and cellular therapy for older adults, their steady improving outcomes, and most importantly, highlight the use of geriatric assessment to help select appropriate older patients and optimize them prior to and following transplantation and cellular therapy. We specifically describe our approach at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and encouraging early results from its implementation.

Geriatric assessment-guided interventions for older adults with multiple myeloma: A feasibility and acceptability study

INTRODUCTION

Geriatric assessment (GA)-guided supportive care programs have been successful in improving treatment outcomes for older adults with solid-organ cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a GA-guided supportive care program among older adults treated for multiple myeloma (MM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study utilized an existing registry of adults with plasma cell disorders at the University of North Carolina. Patients with MM, aged 60 or older, and having a GA-identified deficit in one or more problem area were offered referrals to supportive care resources during routine visits. Problem areas included physical function deficits, polypharmacy, and anxiety or depression. Patients with physical function deficits were offered referral to physical therapy (PT), those with polypharmacy to an Oncology Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner (CPP), and those with mental health symptoms to the Comprehensive Cancer Support Program (CCSP).

RESULTS

Of the 58 individuals identified as having at least one deficit on the GA, PT was the most commonly identified relevant resource (79%), followed by CPP visits (57%). Among individuals that were offered referral(s) to at least one new supportive care resource, the acceptance rate was 50%. Referral acceptance rates were highest among those recommended for a CPP visit (55% of those approached) and lowest for CCSP (0%).

DISCUSSION

The study examined the feasibility and acceptability of a referral program for supportive care resources among older adults with MM who have deficits on GA. The most commonly identified deficit was physical functioning, followed by polypharmacy and mental health. The study found that physical interventions and referrals to CPPs were the most accepted interventions. However, the low proportion of patients who accepted physical therapy referrals indicates the need for tailored and more personalized approaches. Further research is needed to explore the feasibility and impact of supportive care referral programs for older adults with MM.

Association of geriatric measures and global frailty with cognitive decline after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in older adults

INTRODUCTION

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is increasingly offered to older adults, and its potential impact on cognition in this population is understudied. This work aims to evaluate the ability of cancer-specific geriatric assessments (cGA) and a global frailty index based on accumulation of deficits identified in the cGA to predict the risk of cognitive decline after alloHCT in older adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

AlloHCT recipients aged 50 years or older completed a cGA, including a cognitive evaluation by the Blessed Orientation Memory Concentration (BOMC) test, at baseline prior to alloHCT and then at 3, 6, and 12 months after transplant. Baseline frailty was assessed using a deficit accumulation frailty index (DAFI) calculated from the cGA. A multinomial logit model was used to examine the association between predictors (individual cGA measures, DAFI) and the following three outcomes: alive with stable or improved cognition, alive with cognitive decline, and deceased. In post-hoc analyses, analysis of variance was used to compare BOMC scores at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months across frailty categories.

RESULTS

In total, 148 participants were included, with a median age of 62 (range 50-76). At baseline, 12% had cognitive impairment; at one year, 29% of survivors had improved BOMC scores, 33% had stable BOMC, and 37% had worse BOMC. Prior to transplant, 25% were pre-frail and 11% were frail. Individual baseline cGA measures were not associated with cognitive change at one year as assessed by BOMC. Adjusting for age, sex, and education, those who were frail at baseline were 7.4 times as likely to develop cognitive decline at one year than those who were non-frail, although this finding did not reach statistical significance (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-73.8, p = 0.09). The probability of being alive with stable/improved cognition at 12 months for the non-frail, pre-frail, and frail groups was 43%, 34%, and 8%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Baseline geriatric measures and frailty were not significantly associated with cognitive change as assessed by BOMC in adults aged 50 or older after alloHCT. However, the study was underpowered to detect clinically meaningful differences, and future work to elucidate potential associations between frailty and cognitive outcomes is warranted.

HCT frailty scale for younger and older adults undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

The HCT Frailty Scale is an easy prognostic tool composed of (a) Clinical Frailty Scale; (b) Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; (c) Timed-up-and-Go test; (d) Grip Strength; (e) Self-Health Rated Questionnaire; (f) Falls tests; (g) Albumin and C-reactive protein levels. This scale was designed to classify allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) candidates into fit, pre-frail and frail groups, irrespective of age. This study evaluates the ability of this frailty classification to predict overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in adult patients of all ages, in a prospective sample of 298 patients transplanted between 2018 and 2020. At first consultation, 103 (34.6%) patients were fit, 148 (49.7%) pre-frail, and 47 (15.8%) were frail. The 2-year OS and NRM of the three groups were 82.9%, 67.4%, and 48.3% (P < 0.001), and 5.4%, 19.2%, and 37.7% (P < 0.001). For patients younger than 60 years (n = 174), the 2-year OS and NRM of fit, pre-frail, and frail groups were 88.4%, 69.3% and 53.1% (P = 0.002), and 5.8%, 22.8%, and 34.8% (P = 0.005), respectively; and in patients older than 60 (n = 124), OS and NRM were 75.5%, 63.8% and 41.4% (P = 0.006), and 4.9%, 16.4%, and 42.1% (P = 0.001). In conclusion, frailty predicted worse transplant outcomes in both younger and older adults.

Geriatric assessment measures are predictive of outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) commonly affects older adults. However, few studies have examined the relationship between baseline geriatric domains and clinical outcomes in this population. Here, we aim to evaluate the use of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in older (>65 years) untreated patients with CLL to predict outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a planned analysis of 369 patients with CLL age 65 or older treated in a phase 3 randomized trial of bendamustine plus rituximab versus ibrutinib plus rituximab versus ibrutinib alone (A041202). Patients underwent evaluations of geriatric domains including functional status, psychological status, social activity, cognition, social support, and nutritional status. We examined associations among baseline geriatric domains with grade 3+ adverse events using multivariable logistic regression and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using multivariable Cox regression models.

RESULTS

In this study, the median age was 71 years (range: 65-87). In the combined multivariable model, the following geriatric domains were significantly associated with PFS: Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) - social activities survey score (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.974(0.961, 0.988), p = 0.0002) and nutritional status (≥5% weight loss in the preceding six months: (HR [95% CI] 2.717[1.696, 4.354], p < 0.001). MOS - social activities score [HR (95% CI) 0.978(0.958, 0.999), p = 0.038] was associated with OS. No geriatric domains were significantly associated with toxicity. There were no statistically significant interactions between geriatric domains and treatment.

DISCUSSION

Geriatric domains of social activity and nutritional status were associated with OS and/or PFS in older adults with CLL. These findings highlight the importance of assessing geriatric domains to identify high-risk patients with CLL who may benefit from additional support during treatment.

Impact of hematopoietic cell transplant frailty scale on transplant outcome in adults

This prospective study designs an HCT Frailty Scale to classify alloHCT candidates into groups of frail, pre-frail, and fit, and to be implemented in the first consultation at no additional cost. The present scale is composed of the following eight variables: Clinical Frailty Scale, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, Timed Up and Go Test, Grip Strength, Self-Health Rated, Falls, Albumin, and C-Reactive Protein. The Frailty score of a patient is the weighted sum of scores for each item, with weights assigned according to the hazard ratios of a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model estimated and validated with data on OS as the dependent variable, and the scores of the eight variables as explanatory ones, from 298 adults split into training (n = 200) and validation (n = 98) sets. For clinical use, the scale scores were transformed into three categories: scale score ≤1: fit; 1<scale score ≤5.5: pre-frail; scale score >5.5 frail. The estimated probabilities of 1-year OS in each group of frailty, were, respectively: 83.7%, 48.5%, and 16.5% (p < 0.001). In the validation cohort, the respective values were 90.3%, 69.5%, and 46.2% (p < 0.001). Pending further external validations, the HCT Frailty Scale is a low cost-highly informative prognostic signal of outcomes at the pre-transplant stage.

Using Wearable Inertial Sensors to Assess Mobility of Patients With Hematologic Cancer and Associations With Chemotherapy-Related Symptoms Before Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: Cross-sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Wearable sensors could be a simple way to quantify and characterize mobility in patients with hematologic cancer scheduled to receive autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (autoHSCT) and how they may be related to common treatment-related symptoms and side effects of induction chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to conduct a cross-sectional study comparing mobility in patients scheduled to receive autoHSCT with that in healthy, age-matched adult controls and determine the relationships between patient mobility and chemotherapy-related symptoms.

METHODS

Patients scheduled to receive autoHSCT (78/156, 50%) and controls (78/156, 50%) completed the prescribed performance tests using wearable inertial sensors to quantify mobility including turning (turn duration and number of steps), gait (gait speed, stride time, stride time variability, double support time, coronal trunk range of motion, heel strike angle, and distance traveled), and balance (coronal sway, coronal range, coronal velocity, coronal centroidal frequency, sagittal sway, sagittal range, sagittal velocity, and sagittal centroidal frequency). Patients completed the validated patient-reported questionnaires to assess symptoms common to chemotherapy: chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity subscale), nausea and pain (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire), fatigue (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue Short Form 8a), vertigo (Vertigo Symptom Scale-short form), and depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression). Paired, 2-sided t tests were used to compare mobility between patients and controls. Stepwise multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate associations between patient mobility and symptoms.

RESULTS

Patients aged 60.3 (SD 10.3) years had significantly worse turning (turn duration; P<.001), gait (gait speed, stride time, stride time variability, double support time, heel strike angle, stride length, and distance traveled; all P<.001), and balance (coronal sway; P<.001, range; P<.001, velocity; P=.02, and frequency; P=.02; and sagittal range; P=.008) than controls. In patients, high nausea was associated with worse stride time variability (ß=.001; P=.005) and heel strike angle (ß=-.088; P=.02). Pain was associated with worse gait speed (ß=-.003; P=.003), stride time variability (ß=.012; P=.02), stride length (ß=-.002; P=.004), and distance traveled (ß=-.786; P=.005). Nausea and pain explained 17% to 33% and 14% to 36% of gait variance measured in patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients scheduled to receive autoHSCT demonstrated worse mobility in multiple turning, gait, and balance domains compared with controls, potentially related in part to nausea and pain. Wearable inertial sensors used in the clinic setting could provide granular information about mobility before further treatment, which may in turn benefit from rehabilitation or symptom management. Future longitudinal studies are needed to better understand temporal changes in mobility and symptoms across the treatment trajectory to optimally time, design, and implement strategies, to preserve functioning in patients with hematologic cancer in the long term.

Geriatric Assessment Reveals Actionable Impairments in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Candidates Age 18 to 80 Years

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for both malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases; however, reported rates of treatment-related mortality approach 30%. Outcomes are worse in patients who begin HCT with functional impairments. To detect such impairments, a geriatric assessment (GA) is recommended in adults age ≥65 years. Younger HCT candidates also may be impaired because of chemotherapy regimens pre-HCT. Therefore, we hypothesized that GA can be beneficial for adult patients of all ages and subsequently created a clinical pretransplantation optimization program to assess all HCT candidates using a modified GA. One-hundred fifty-seven patients were evaluated in 4 functional domains- physical, cognitive, nutritional, and psychological-at 2 time points prior to HCT-new patient evaluation (NPE) and sign-off (SO)-between October 2017 and January 2020. At NPE, 80.9% of the patients had at least 1 domain with a functional impairment, and physical (P = .006), cognitive (P = .04), and psychological (P = .04) impairments were associated with an increased likelihood of not proceeding to HCT. In addition, patients age 18 to 39 years were more likely than older patients to have a physical function impairment (P = .001). Between NPE and SO, 51.9% of the patients had resolution of 1 or more impairments, and nutritional impairment at SO was predictive of worse overall survival (P = .01). Our study shows that GA can identify functional impairments in patients of all ages. Early identification of impairments could facilitate referrals to supportive care and resolution of impairments prior to HCT, suggesting that GA could be recommended for HCT candidates of all ages.

Patterns and predictors of functional decline after alloHCT in older adults

BACKGROUND

As allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is increasingly offered to older adults, geriatric assessments (GA) have been identified as a useful tool for predicting outcomes, particularly functional status. However, very few studies have examined the longitudinal change in GA measures in the post-alloHCT period.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study are to 1) describe the longitudinal change in GA and QOL measures after alloHCT and to 2) identify predictors of greater functional decline post-transplant.

STUDY DESIGN

In this single-center prospective cohort study, patients aged 50 years or older planning to undergo alloHCT completed a cancer-specific GA and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) survey at baseline prior to alloHCT and then at 3, 6, and 12 months after transplant. Changes in GA and QOL measures at each post-transplant time point (3, 6, or 12 months) compared to baseline were analyzed using paired t-tests. Exploration of potential predictors of greater post-transplant functional decline, as measured by instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and Medical Outcomes Study Physical Health scale (MOS-PH), were examined using linear regressions and chi-squared two-sample test of proportions.

RESULTS

Mean functional status generally exhibited a pattern of decline at 3 to 6 months post-alloHCT, with recovery to near baseline by 12 months. Mean mental health and emotional QOL were lowest at baseline and improved at all time points post-transplant. Differences in baseline clinical characteristics were not associated with any differences in functional trajectories. Differences in baseline GA measures (patient-rated KPS, IADL, MOS-PH, Timed-Up-and-Go, Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration test, Mental Health Inventory 5) also did not predict greater functional decline at 3 months. Patients whose IADL was improved or maintained at 3 months generally maintained their functional status at 6 and 12 months. Similarly, most patients who had IADL decline at 3 months still had functional decline at 6 months, though a portion did have functional recovery by 12 months. Compared to those with improved/maintained IADL at 3 months, those with declined IADL at 3 months were significantly more likely to have persistent functional decline at 6 months (p<0.0001) and 12 months (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In older alloHCT patients, mean functional status declines short-term after alloHCT with possibility of recovery by 6 to 12 months, while mean mental and emotional health improve post-alloHCT. Functional decline at 3 months post-alloHCT is associated with persistent functional decline at 12 months.

Haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in older adults: geriatric assessment, donor considerations, and optimisation of care

Haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) has seen substantial growth among older adults. Chronological age is no longer viewed as an absolute barrier to HSCT, and alternative methods for assessing pre-transplantation fitness are increasingly used. In this Series paper, we summarise the metrics for pre-transplantation risk assessment in older adults, including both traditional metrics and geriatric assessment, and the ability of these metrics to predict post-transplantation outcomes. We also discuss strategies to broaden the utility of geriatric assessment, including in chronologically younger HSCT candidates and to guide individualised pre-transplantation interventions. Finally, we discuss donor considerations in older adults, including use of older sibling donors, haploidentical donors, and emerging data for donor-associated clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential.

Replicated Risk Index of Patient Functional Status Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Predicts Healthcare Utilization and Survival

Poor physical functioning is associated with adverse outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Analytic tools to predict mortality in alloHCT recipients include the HCT Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) based on comorbidities and the Disease Risk Index (DRI) based on disease and disease status. We developed and replicated a risk model for overall survival (OS), early mortality (ie, death from any cause at or before day +100), initial hospital length of stay (LOS), and percentage of inpatient days within the first year post-alloHCT. In this study, we incorporated a physical therapy (PT) assessment with the HCT-CI and DRI to improve outcome predictions. The well-defined and feasible measure of functional status for assessing risk includes (1) the number of sit-to-stands performed in 30 seconds, (2) performance of 25 step-ups on the right/left side with (3) oxygen saturation recovery and (4) heart rate recovery, (5) weight-bearing ability, (6) assistance with ambulation, (7) motor and grip strength, (8) sensory and coordination impairment (eg, self-reported peripheral neuropathy, imbalance), (9) self-reported pain, and (10) limited endurance (ie, inability to complete step-ups and/or sit-to-stands). Our training cohort (TC) included 349 consecutive alloHCT recipients at Roswell Park treated between 2010 and 2016 and a subsequent replication cohort (RC; n = 163) treated between 2016 and 2019. Four of the 10 metrics-self-reported pain, limited endurance, self-reported neuropathy, and <10 sit-to-stands in 30 seconds-were identified as significant predictors and were included in the multivariable models with the HCT-CI and DRI to create a new risk index (HCT-PCDRI: HCT-physical, comorbidity, and DRI) for outcomes. Models were tested in the RC. Shorter OS was associated with self-reported pain, limited endurance, higher HCT-CI, and higher DRI. At a median follow-up of 34 months, the 3-year OS based on the HCT-PCDRI was 30% for the very-high-risk group, 54% for the high-risk group, 49% for the intermediate-risk group, and 80% for the low-risk group. The number of patients identified as very high risk increased from 55 using HCT-CI alone to 120 with the new HCT-PCDRI, whereas the number in the low-risk group decreased from 91 to 45. Early mortality and a higher percentage of inpatient days within the first year post-alloHCT (a proxy for poor quality of life and high healthcare utilization) were associated with self-reported pain, higher HCT-CI, and higher DRI. A shorter initial LOS (ie, initial low healthcare utilization) was associated with performance of >10 sit-to-stands in 30 seconds, no self-reported neuropathy, and lower HCT-CI. These PT metrics combined with the HCT-CI and DRI created the HCT-PCDRI, which resulted in more patients being categorized accurately as high risk versus low risk. The HCT-PCDRI results were replicated in an independent cohort. Pre-alloHCT PT metrics with self-reported symptoms (pain and neuropathy) were associated with survival post-alloHCT and prolonged hospital LOS. The HCT-PCDRI scoring system for risk stratification of alloHCT recipients more accurately identifies patients at potential risk of poor outcomes. The HCT-PCDRI can be tested in <15 minutes to identify patients for intervention before or during treatment to potentially improve outcomes.

Biobehavioral Research and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Expert Review from the Biobehavioral Research Special Interest Group of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for many hematologic conditions. Despite advances in conditioning and supportive measures, however, there remain significant comorbidities that threaten survivorship. Adverse effects of stress-related biobehavioral processes-defined here as the interactions of behavioral, psychological, and socioenvironmental factors with biology-impact immune recovery and function and are particularly salient in the HCT context, given the importance of immune reconstitution for improved survivorship. However, biobehavioral processes have been underinvestigated in this vulnerable group compared with other cancer populations. Here the Biobehavioral Research Special Interest Group (SIG) of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy provides an expert review to inform research directions explicating the biological correlates of behavioral symptoms and evaluate the impact of these on HCT outcomes. The goal of this expert review is to provide a foundation for advancing science that effectively integrates behavioral and biological processes to optimize quality of life and improve clinical outcomes for HCT recipients.

Characterize, Optimize, and Harmonize: Caring for Older Adults With Hematologic Malignancies

With the aging of the population, the number of older adults with hematologic malignancies is growing, and treatment paradigms for these patients are rapidly evolving. Use of allogeneic stem cell transplant has been expanding to include septuagenarians but remains a potentially morbid procedure, creating an opportunity for a geriatric-focused evaluation to improve assessment of the individual's risk in undergoing the procedure. Although age alone should not be the sole determinant for transplant eligibility, geriatric assessment often identifies vulnerabilities that are not captured in assessing performance status and comorbidities alone. Those vulnerabilities may be optimized in an approach employing three sequential steps: characterize resiliency, bolster resilience, and harmonize with patient goals. Data are emerging that show that this approach is associated with lower nonrelapse mortality, shorter length of stay, and better survival after transplant. In older adults with myeloma, treatment recommendations also aim to balance the expected efficacy and toxicity profile and incorporate the patient's goals and preferences. Assessment of frailty allows for more personalized estimates of risk of toxicity. Currently, the European Myeloma Network currently recommends using the International Myeloma Working Group frailty scale as a standard approach to defining frail or at-risk populations with myeloma. In addition to treatment selection, the care of older adults with myeloma must include consideration of other issues, including reducing early mortality with antibiotic prophylaxis, polypharmacy, depression, cognition, and falls. Overall, appreciation of the aging-associated vulnerabilities will allow for the ultimate personalized care and treatment of older adults with hematologic malignancies.

Recommendations and outcomes from a geriatric assessment guided multidisciplinary clinic prior to autologous stem cell transplant in older patients

BACKGROUND

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (autoHCT) is a mainstay of treatment for multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma but is underutilized in older adults. We investigated the association of vulnerabilities identified by a geriatric assessment (GA)-guided multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) on the receipt of autoHCT and evaluated its ability to predict outcomes in older autoHCT candidates.

METHODS

Patients 50+ years received GA-informed optimization recommendations: 'decline' if unlikely to realize benefits of autoHCT, 'defer' if optimization necessary before autoHCT, and 'proceed' if autoHCT could proceed without delay. We compared characteristics and outcomes of autoHCT recipients (n = 62) to non-autoHCT patients (n = 29) and evaluated GA deficits on outcomes.

RESULTS

91 patients were evaluated; the MDC recommendation was 'decline' for 5 (6%), 'defer' for 25 (27%), and 'proceed' for 61 (67%). AutoHCT recipients had fewer GA-rated impairments relative to non-autoHCT patients, as did patients with a 'proceed' recommendation relative to 'defer'. Among autoHCT recipients, 1-year and 3-year non-relapse morality (NRM) was 0% and 5%, and there was no difference in length of hospitalization, readmission rate, or mortality after transplant by MDC recommendation. Frail grip strength and poor performance status were associated with inferior post-autoHCT progression-free survival and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients pursuing autoHCT after MDC-directed optimization achieved excellent outcomes, including patients deferred but ultimately receiving autoHCT. GA-identified functional deficits, especially frail grip strength, may improve risk stratification in older autoHCT candidates. Employing a GA earlier in the disease trajectory to inform early referral to an MDC may increase autoHCT safety and utilization in older patients.

Serial comprehensive geriatric and quality of life assessments in adults age ≥ 50 years undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation

OBJECTIVES

We sought to examine the natural history of geriatric assessment (GA) and quality of life (QOL) domains among adults age ≥ 50 years undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A QOL tool and cancer-specific GA were completed before autoHCT in patients ≥50 years, and at 100 days, six months, and one year post-transplant.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-four patients completed the pre-transplant QOL/GA assessment, 169 (92%) completed the 100-day assessment, 162 (88%) completed the six-month assessment, and 145 (79%) completed the twelve-month assessment. Functional status, as measured by instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), decreased from baseline to day 101 (mean change -0.42 points, 95% CI, -0.75 to -0.09, p = 0.01) but returned to baseline by one year. Physical function as measured by Medical Outcomes Study-Physical Health (MOS-PH) increased by mean of 3.27 points (95% CI, -0.02 to 6.56, p = 0.05) by one year. Physician-rated KPS improved by one year, but patient-rated KPS did not. No QOL metric deteriorated from baseline. Baseline factors predictive of IADL and MOS-PH as measured over time included comorbidities and disease status at transplant. IADL and MOS-PH as measured over time were not significantly associated with age.

CONCLUSIONS

AutoHCT for adults age ≥ 50 years resulted in an initial decrease in functional status, with subsequent improvement back to baseline by one year. Physical health and QOL measures were improved or unchanged over time. AutoHCT is well tolerated in well selected older patients, using patient reported geriatric metrics as outcomes.

Results from a multidisciplinary clinic guided by geriatric assessment before stem cell transplantation in older adults

Limitations found on geriatric assessment (GA) track with worse outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We report on a multidisciplinary team clinic (MDC), consisting of a cancer-specific GA and a multidisciplinary team of providers, to assess candidacy and create an individualized optimization plan for allogeneic HCT candidates aged ≥60 years and autologous HCT and adoptive T-cell therapy candidates aged ≥70 years. Among the 247 patients evaluated in the MDC, allogeneic HCT candidates comprised the majority (60%), followed by autologous HCT (37%) with occasional older cellular therapy candidates (3%). Almost all patients meeting program-required minimum ages for MDC optimization at our institution were assessed (98%). Relative to historical control subjects undergoing GA alone, allogeneic HCT patients aged ≥60 years who underwent MDC appraisal had similar frequencies of high-risk disease, reduced intensity regimens, and high comorbidity but fewer GA-graded functional impairments. The MDC cohort experienced fewer inpatient deaths, shorter length of stay, and fewer discharges to nursing facilities compared with control subjects. Improvements in early mortality were observed over time; 1-year overall survival improved from 43% in the pre-MDC era to 70% in the recent MDC era, and 1-year nonrelapse mortality decreased from 43% to 18%. The 31 autologous HCT recipients aged ≥70 years optimized by the MDC achieved 0% nonrelapse mortality and 97% overall survival at 1 year. A GA-guided MDC for older HCT candidates is feasible and seems to reduce transplant-associated morbidity and mortality. An MDC should encourage broader and safer utilization of transplantation in older patients.

Pilot prospective study of Frailty and Functionality in routine clinical assessment in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

A Frailty and Functionality evaluation for alloHCT was implemented using existing resources. We describe the implementation of this evaluation across all ages and at first consultation, and correlate results with posttransplant outcomes in 168 patients. The evaluation consists of: Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), grip strength (GS), timed up and go test (TUGT), self-rated health question (SRH), Single question of Falls, albumin and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) levels. Median time to perform the evaluation was 5-6 min. Median age was 58 years (range: 19-77) and median follow-up was 5.3 months. TUGT > 10 s (HR 2.92; p = 0.003), raised CRP (HR 4.40; p < 0.001), and hypoalbuminemia (HR 2.10; p = 0.043) were significant risk factors for worse overal survival (OS). CFS ≥ 3 (HR 3.11; p = 0.009), TUGT > 10 s (HR 3.47; p = 0.003), GS (HR 2.56; p = 0.029), SRH (<excellent) (HR 3.8 × 10⁶; p < 0.001), elevated CRP (HR 11.8; p < 0.001), and hypoalbuminemia (HR 4.6; p < 0.001), were significant predictors for worse non relapse mortality (NRM). On multivariable analysis, TUGT > 10 s and raised CRP were significant predictors for worse OS and NRM. SRH (<excellent) was a significant predictor for higher NRM. Frailty and Functionality can be assessed in routine clinical practice in alloHCT and may be predictive of short-term outcomes.

Geriatric assessment in older patients with a hematologic malignancy: a systematic review

The aim of this systematic review is to give an update of all currently available evidence on the relevance of a geriatric assessment in the treatment of older patients with hematologic malignancies. A systematic search in MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed to find studies in which a geriatric assessment was used to detect impaired geriatric domains or to address the association between geriatric assessment and survival or clinical outcome measures. The literature search included 4,629 reports, of which 54 publications from 44 studies were included. Seventy-three percent of the studies were published in the last 5 years. The median age of the patients was 73 years (range, 58-86) and 71% had a good World Health Organization (WHO) performance status. The median prevalence of geriatric impairments varied between 17% and 68%, even in patients with a good WHO performance status. Polypharmacy, nutritional status and instrumental activities of daily living were most frequently impaired. Whereas several geriatric impairments and frailty (based on a frailty screening tool or summarized geriatric assessment score) were predictive for a shorter overall survival, WHO performance status lost its predictive value in most studies. The association between geriatric impairments and treatment-related toxicity varied, with a trend towards a higher risk of (non-)hematologic toxicity in frail patients. During the follow-up, frailty seemed to be associated with treatment non-completion, especially when patients were malnourished. Patients with a good physical capacity had a shorter stay in hospital and a lower rate of hospitalization. Geriatric assessment, even in patients with a good performance status, can detect impaired geriatric domains and these impairments may be predictive of mortality. Moreover, geriatric impairments suggest a higher risk of treatment-related toxicity, treatment non-completion and use of healthcare services. A geriatric assessment should be considered before starting treatment in older patients with hematologic malignancies.

Delivering intensive therapies to older adults with hematologic malignancies: strategies to personalize care

Intensive therapies are often medically indicated for older adults with hematologic malignancies. These may include induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as well as autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (autoHCT) and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT). However, it is not always clear how to best deliver these therapies, in terms of determining treatment eligibility, as well as adjusting or adding supportive measures to the treatment plan to maximize successful outcomes. Beyond performance status and presence of comorbidities, comprehensive geriatric assessment and individual geriatric metrics have increasingly been used to prognosticate in these settings and may offer the best approach to personalizing therapy. In the setting of AML induction, evidence supports the use of measures of physical function as independent predictors of survival. For patients undergoing alloHCT, functional status, as measured by instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and gait speed, may be an important pretransplant assessment. IADL has also been associated with post-autoHCT morbidity and mortality. Current best practice includes assessment of relevant geriatric metrics prior to intensive therapy, and work is ongoing to develop complementary interventions.

Delivering intensive therapies to older adults with hematologic malignancies: strategies to personalize care

Intensive therapies are often medically indicated for older adults with hematologic malignancies. These may include induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as well as autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (autoHCT) and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT). However, it is not always clear how to best deliver these therapies, in terms of determining treatment eligibility, as well as adjusting or adding supportive measures to the treatment plan to maximize successful outcomes. Beyond performance status and presence of comorbidities, comprehensive geriatric assessment and individual geriatric metrics have increasingly been used to prognosticate in these settings and may offer the best approach to personalizing therapy. In the setting of AML induction, evidence supports the use of measures of physical function as independent predictors of survival. For patients undergoing alloHCT, functional status, as measured by instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and gait speed, may be an important pretransplant assessment. IADL has also been associated with post-autoHCT morbidity and mortality. Current best practice includes assessment of relevant geriatric metrics prior to intensive therapy, and work is ongoing to develop complementary interventions.

Ready for prime time: role for geriatric assessment to improve quality of care in hematology practice

Older adults represent the growing majority of patients diagnosed with hematologic disorders, yet they remain underrepresented on clinical trials. Older patients of the same chronologic age differ from one another with varying comorbidity and functional reserve. The concepts of frailty and resilience are important to patient-centered care and are patient and setting specific. The use of geriatric assessment to inform tailored decision making and management can personalize care for older adults with hematologic malignancies. This article will highlight available evidence to support the role of geriatric assessment measures to enhance quality of care for older adults diagnosed with hematologic malignancies.

Ready for prime time: role for geriatric assessment to improve quality of care in hematology practice

These 2 reviews respectively examine the value and utility of geriatric assessment (GA) tools and discuss the role of GA in the clinical management of patients with hematologic malignancies.

Use of geriatric assessment in hematopoietic cell transplant

Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is an important aspect of treatment for many hematologic malignancies. As cancer is a disease associated with aging, and hematologic malignancies are no exception, rates of autologous and allogeneic HCT utilization in older adults are on the rise. The most common indications for autologous HCT are multiple myeloma and lymphoma, and for allogenic HCT are acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Older adults into their eighth decade of life can have favorable outcomes after autologous and allogeneic HCT, at least among select patients. Evaluation of older adults prior to HCT can be aided by utilizing a geriatric assessment (GA). GA can identify areas of vulnerability in older adults prior to HCT not captured by more traditional measures. In the future, GA may be utilized to guide interventions prior to HCT to improve outcomes of older adults. Further studies are needed to expand the paucity of data in utilizing GA to identify three groups of patients: those who clearly benefit from HCT, those who would clearly be harmed, and those who might benefit but would require additional support during and after HCT.

Impact of geriatric vulnerabilities on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes in older patients with hematologic malignancies

Older patients are at increased risk for complications and death following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Traditional transplant-specific prognostic indices such as hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index (HCT-CI) may not capture all underlying geriatric vulnerabilities, and in-depth evaluation by a geriatrician prior to transplant may not always be available. We hypothesize that routine pretransplant interdisciplinary clinical assessment may uncover prognostically important geriatric deficits. Using an institutional database of 457 adults aged 60 years and older who underwent first allo-HCT for hematological malignancies from 2010 to 2017, we examined the prognostic impact of pretransplant deficits in geriatric domains of function, mobility, mood, medication, nutrition, and relevant biochemical markers. We found that impairment in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) was associated with reduced survival through increased nonrelapse mortality (NRM, HR = 1.82; 95% CI, 1.04-3.19). The combination of IADL impairment with either HCT-CI/age index or disease risk index readily stratified NRM and overall survival, respectively. In addition, we found that even mild renal dysfunction adversely impacted survival in older transplant patients. Our findings establish important geriatric vulnerabilities in older patients prior to allo-HCT and may provide an entry point for prospective, interventional trials to improve their outcomes.