Access to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation among Pediatric Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Population-Based Analysis

Access to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Canada for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant is a complicated intervention only offered in specialized centers. Access to transplants may vary based on the location of primary residence, income levels, age, and reported race or ethnicity. Using data from the Canadian Institute of Health (CIH) Discharge abstract database (DAD), all non-Quebec Canadians under the age of 65 with a diagnosis of AML between 2004 and 2015 were included in this study. Descriptive statistics were produced for the variables of interest: time period, age, sex, rurality, transplant status, proportion of visible minorities, proportion identifying as indigenous, and proportion of low-income families. Transplant rates were compared and reported using univariable and multivariable analysis. In multivariable analysis, time period, province of residence, gender, and age were significantly associated with the receipt of an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. However, differences in transplant rates observed in indigenous patients, low-income families, and visible minorities were not found to be statistically significant. In non-Quebec Canada, transplant rates vary significantly with province of residence, with the highest rates recorded in Alberta. Contrary to findings previously reported in studies exploring access to transplant in the United States, a low-income level was not associated with lower rates of transplants. This might suggest that Canada’s universal health care insurance program is protective against socioeconomic barriers that impact access to health care services.

Outcomes of Lymphoma Among American Adolescent and Young Adult Patients Varied by Health Insurance-A SEER-based Study

INTRODUCTION

Impacts of health insurance status on survival outcomes among adolescent and young adult (AYA, 15 to 39 years of age) patients with lymphoma in the United States are insufficiently known. This study aimed to clarify associations between health insurance status and overall survival (OS) estimates in this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined 18 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries in the United States and analyzed American AYA patients with lymphoma diagnosed during January 2007 and December 2016. Health insurance status was categorized, and Kaplan-Meier and multifactor Cox regressions were adopted using hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval. Probable baseline confounding was modulated by multiple propensity score.

RESULTS

A total of 21,149 patients were considered; ~28% were 18 to 25 years old, and 63.5% and 7.5% had private and no insurance, respectively. Private insurance rates increased in the 18 to 25 age group (60.1% to 6.1%, P<0.001) following the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), and lymphoma survival rates improved slightly 1 to 5 years postdiagnosis. Five-year OS rates decreased with age (93.9%, 90.4%, and 87.0% at 15 to 17, 18 to 25, and 26 to 39, respectively) and differed among insurance conditions (81.7%, 79.2%, 89.2%, and 92.0% for uninsured, Medicaid, insured, and insured/no specifics, respectively). Risk of death was significantly higher for those with Medicaid or no insurance than for those with private insurance in multiple propensity score-adjusted models (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]=1.07 [1.03-1.12]), independent of stage at diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

No or insufficient insurance was linked to poor OS in our sample in exposure-outcome association analysis. Insurance coverage and health care availability may enhance disparate outcomes of AYAs with cancer. The ACA has improved insurance coverage and survival rates for out sample. Nevertheless, strategies are needed to identify causality and eliminate disparities.

Examining the Effect of Travel Distance to Pediatric Cancer Centers and Rurality on Survival and Treatment Experiences: A Systematic Review

Accessing pediatric cancer treatment remains problematic for rural families or those living at increased distances from specialized centers. Rural adult cancer patients or those living far removed from treatment may present with later stage disease, receive different treatments than their closer counterparts, and experience worsened survival. While the financial and psychosocial strain of increased travel is well documented, effects of travel distance on similar outcomes for pediatric cancer patients remain ill-defined. We conducted a systematic review to synthesize literature examining the effect of travel distance and/or rurality (as a proxy for distance) on pediatric cancer treatment experiences and survival outcomes. Included studies examined travel distance to specialized centers or rural status for patients above 21 years of age. Studies were excluded if they focused on financial or quality of life outcomes. We analyzed 24 studies covering myriad malignancies and outcomes, including location of care, clinical trial participation, and likelihood of receiving specialized treatments such as stem cell transplants or proton beam therapy. Most were retrospective, and 9 were conducted outside the United States. While some studies suggest rural patients may experience worsened survival and those traveling furthest may experience shorter hospitalization times/rates, the available evidence does not uniformly assert negative effects of increased distance.

Regional differences in access to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation among pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Indications for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are primarily dependent on risk stratification at diagnosis and relapse status. We sought to determine whether access to HSCT is influenced by regional and socioeconomic factors.

METHODS

Children with newly diagnosed AML aged < 15 years between 2001 and 2015 were identified using the Cancer in Young People in Canada national population-based registry. Factors potentially associated with the receipt of HSCT were studied using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Overall, 568 children with newly diagnosed AML were included and 262 (46%) received HSCT. A greater proportion of patients, 103/157 (65.6%), underwent HSCT after first or subsequent relapse compared to 159/411 (38.7%) patients who underwent transplant before relapse. Among patients for whom HSCT would be considered before relapse, factors associated with higher odds of HSCT in a multivariable analysis were: poor versus good-risk cytogenetics (Odds ratio [OR]: 30.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.7-117.0), diagnosis during 2012-2015 versus 2001-2006 (OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.6-6.3), diagnosis in eastern Canada versus central Canada (OR: 3.7, 95% CI: 1.9-7.3), and age 10-14 years versus age < 1 year (OR: 5.4, 95% CI: 2.3-12.8). Among patients for whom HSCT would be considered after first relapse, higher odds of HSCT was associated with diagnosis at a HSCT center (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.1-4.1).

CONCLUSION

Patients diagnosed at a HSCT performing center and patients from eastern Canada had higher odds of receiving HSCT. This may suggest preferential access to HSCT for certain patients.