Outcomes of Salvage Haploidentical Transplant with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Rescuing Graft Failure Patients: a Report on Behalf of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Salvage haploidentical transplantation for graft failure after first haploidentical allogeneic stem cell transplantation: an updated experience

Graft failure is a fatal complication following allogeneic stem cell transplantation where a second transplantation is usually required for salvage. However, there are no recommended regimens for second transplantations for graft failure, especially in the haploidentical transplant setting. We recently reported encouraging outcomes using a novel method (haploidentical transplantation from a different donor after conditioning with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide). Herein, we report updated outcomes in 30 patients using this method. The median time of the second transplantation was 96.5 (33-215) days after the first transplantation. Except for one patient who died at +19d and before engraftment, neutrophil engraftments were achieved in all patients at 11 (8-24) days, while platelet engraftments were achieved in 22 (75.8%) patients at 17.5 (9-140) days. The 1-year OS and DFS were 60% and 53.3%, and CIR and TRM was 6.7% and 33.3%, respectively. Compared with the historical group, neutrophil engraftment (100% versus 58.5%, p < 0.001) and platelet engraftment (75.8% versus 32.3%, p < 0.001) were better in the novel regimen group, and OS was also improved (60.0% versus 26.4%, p = 0.011). In conclusion, salvage haploidentical transplantation from a different donor using the novel regimen represents a promising option to rescue patients with graft failure after the first haploidentical transplantation.

Myelofibrosis and allogeneic transplantation: critical points and challenges

New available drugs allow better control of systemic symptoms associated with myelofibrosis (MF) and splenomegaly but they do not modify the natural history of progressive and poor prognosis disease. Thus, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is still considered the only available curative treatment for patients with MF. Despite the increasing number of procedures worldwide in recent years, HSCT for MF patients remains challenging. An increasingly complex network of the patient, disease, and transplant-related factors should be considered to understand the need for and the benefits of the procedure. Unfortunately, prospective trials are often lacking in this setting, making an evidence-based decision process particularly arduous. In the present review, we will analyze the main controversial points of allogeneic transplantation in MF, that is, the development of more sophisticated models for the identification of eligible patients; the need for tools offering a more precise definition of expected outcomes combining comorbidity assessment and factors related to the procedure; the decision-making process about the best transplantation time; the evaluation of the most appropriate platform for curative treatment; the impact of splenomegaly; and splenectomy on outcomes.

Prospects and Potential for Chimerism Analysis after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Chimerism analysis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation serves to confirm engraftment, indicate relapse of hematologic malignancy, and attribute graft failure to either immune rejection or poor graft function. Short tandem repeat PCR (STR-PCR) is the prevailing method, followed by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), with detection limits of 1-5% and 0.1%, respectively. Chimerism assays using digital PCR or next-generation sequencing, both of which are more sensitive than STR-PCR, are increasingly used. Stable mixed chimerism is usually not associated with poor outcomes in non-malignant diseases, but recipient chimerism may foretell relapse of hematologic malignancies, so higher detection sensitivity may be beneficial in such cases. Thus, the need for and the type of intervention, e.g., immunosuppression regimen, donor lymphocyte infusion, and/or salvage second transplantation, should be guided by donor chimerism in the context of the feature and/or residual malignant cells of the disease to be treated.

Graft failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric patients with acute leukemia: autologous reconstitution or second transplant?

BACKGROUND

Graft failure (GF) is a rare but serious complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Prevention of graft failure remains the most advisable approach as there is no clear recommendation for the best strategies for reversing this complication. Administration of growth factor, additional hematopoietic progenitor boost, or a salvage HSCT are current modalities recommended for the treatment of GF. Autologous recovery without evidence of disease relapse occurs rarely in patients with GF, and in the absence of autologous recovery, further salvage transplantation following a second conditioning regimen is a potential treatment option that offers the best chances of long-term disease-free survival. The preconditioning regimens of second HSCT have a significant impact on engraftment and outcome, however, currently there is no consensus on optimal conditioning regimen for second HSCT in patients who have developed GF. Furthermore, a second transplant from a different donor or the same donor is still a matter of debate.

OBSERVATIONS

We present our experience in managing pediatric patients with acute leukemia who encountered graft failure following stem cell transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Although a second transplantation is almost the only salvage method, we illustrate that some pediatric patients with acute leukemia who experience graft failure after an allogeneic stem cell transplant using Myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen may achieve long-term disease-free survival through autologous hematopoiesis recovery.

CD3+TCRαβ/CD19+ depleted mismatched family or unrelated donor salvage stem cell transplantation for graft dysfunction in inborn errors of immunity

BACKGROUND

A minority of children experience significant graft dysfunction after an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) for inborn errors of immunity (IEI). The optimal approach to salvage HSCT is unclear with respect to conditioning regimen and stem cell source. This single-centre retrospective case series reports the outcomes of salvage CD3+TCRαβ/CD19 depleted mismatched family or unrelated donor stem cell transplantation (TCRαβ-SCT) between 2013 - 2022 for graft dysfunction in 12 children with IEI.

OBJECTIVES

Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS), graft-versus-host disease (GvHD)-free and event-free survival (GEFS), toxicities, GvHD, viremia and long-term graft function.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective audit of patients who underwent second CD3+TCRαβ/CD19 depleted mismatched donor graft using Treosulfan-based reduced toxicity myeloablative conditioning.

RESULTS

Median age at first HSCT was 8.76 months (range, 2.5 months - 6 years) and at second TCRαβ-SCT was 3.6 years (1.2 - 11 years). Median interval between first and second HSCT was 1.7 years (3 months - 9 years). The primary diagnoses were: severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) (n=5) and non-SCID IEI (n=7). The indications for second HSCT were: primary aplasia (n=1), secondary autologous reconstitution (n=6), refractory aGVHD (n=3) and secondary leukemia (n=1). Donors were either haploidentical parental donors (n=10) or mismatched unrelated donors (n=2). All received TCRαβ/CD19-depleted-PBSC with a median CD34+ cell dose of 9.3 × 10⁶/kg (2.8-32.3 × 10⁶/kg) and a median TCRαβ+ cell dose of 4 × 10⁴/kg (1.3-19.2 × 10⁴/kg). All engrafted with median days to neutrophil and platelet recovery of 15 (12-24) and 12 (9-19). One developed secondary aplasia and one had secondary autologous reconstitution, but both underwent a successful third HSCT. Four (33%) had grade II aGvHD and none had grade III-IV aGvHD. None had cGvHD but one developed extensive cutaneous cGVHD after third HSCT using PBSC and ATG. Nine (75%) were noted to have at least one episode of blood viremia with HHV6 (n=6, 50%), adenovirus (n=6, 50%), EBV (n=3, 25%) or CMV (n=3; 25%). Median duration of follow-up was 2.3 years (range: 0.5 - 10 years) and the 2-year OS, EFS and GEFS were 100% (95% confidence interval, 0-100%), 73% (37-90%) and 73% (37%-90%) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TCRαβ-SCT from mismatched family or unrelated donors, using a chemotherapy only regimen, is a safe alternative donor salvage transplant strategy for second HSCT in patients without a suitably matched donor.

[Graft failure, poor graft function erythroblastopenia: Actualization of definitions, diagnosis and treatment: Guidelines from the SFGM-TC]

In this article, we discuss again the definition, the risk factor and guideline to treat the graft failure, the poor graft function and erythrobalstopenia. Graft failure is a severe but rare complication after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Despite disparity in the literature, we defined this complication and discussed the factor risks and recommendation for treatment based on new studies. Poor graft function is also a more frequent complication after HCT. New studies will soon be available to prove or not the current recommendation suggested in this article based on therapeutics medicine or cellular therapy. Erythroblastopenia, is a rarer complication post HCT. Despite anticipation for a better choice of compatibility donor/recipient, some patients still suffer from this complication.

Abatacept-based Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Haplo-identical Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in a High-risk Cohort

BACKGROUND

There is insufficient guidance in using posttransplant cyclophosphamide in patients with organ dysfunctions. Abatacept (Aba), a T cell costimulation blockade, has recently been shown to prevent severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

OBSERVATION

We report adding Aba as GVHD prophylaxis in 4 pediatrics patients who received haplo-hematopoietic cell transplantation. Two patients had grade 2 acute GVHD and 2 had mild chronic GVHD. All 4 patients are alive with full donor chimerism, and 3 are off immunosuppressants.

CONCLUSION

An Aba-based regimen can result in reliable engraftment and acceptable GVHD when concerns of organ dysfunction prevents the use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide in haplo-hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Outcomes of salvage haploidentical transplantation using posttransplant cyclophosphamide for graft failure following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Haploidentical donors have emerged as an alternative donor source for salvage stem cell transplantation (SCT) after graft failure; however, data regarding salvage haploidentical SCT using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) are limited. Using nationwide data (2011-2019), we retrospectively investigated transplant outcomes after salvage haploidentical SCT using PTCy for graft failure (n = 33, median age 34 years). The total dose of PTCy was 75-100 mg/kg (standard dose) in 26 patients (78.8%) and 40-50 mg/kg (lower dose) in 5 patients (15.2%). The neutrophil engraftment rate at 30 days was 81.8%. One-year overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates were 47.4% and 46.0%, respectively. The standard-dose group exhibited better OS (61.1% vs. 0.0% at 1 year, P = 0.022) and NRM (35.1% vs. 80.0% at 1 year, P = 0.052) than the lower-dose group. Moreover, the standard-dose group was less prone to both grades II-IV (11.5% vs. 40.0%) and III-IV (0.0% vs. 40.0%) acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Use of cyclophosphamide in previous SCT and conditioning did not affect OS or NRM. In conclusion, haploidentical salvage SCT using PTCy offers promising survival outcomes. Prospective studies are required to validate the efficacy of salvage haploidentical SCT using PTCy.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children receiving haematopoietic cell transplantation and immune effector cell therapy: an international and multidisciplinary consensus statement

Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in children receiving haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and immune effector cell therapy is controversial and evidence-based guidelines have not been established. Remarkable advancements in HCT and immune effector cell therapies have changed expectations around reversibility of organ dysfunction and survival for affected patients. Herein, members of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network (HCT and cancer immunotherapy subgroup), the Pediatric Diseases Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), the supportive care committee of the Pediatric Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Consortium (PTCTC), and the Pediatric Intensive Care Oncology Kids in Europe Research (POKER) group of the European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) provide consensus recommendations on the use of ECMO in children receiving HCT and immune effector cell therapy. These are the first international, multidisciplinary consensus-based recommendations on the use of ECMO in this patient population. This Review provides a clinical decision support tool for paediatric haematologists, oncologists, and critical care physicians during the difficult decision-making process of ECMO candidacy and management. These recommendations can represent a base for future research studies focused on ECMO selection criteria and bedside management.

Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation after Graft Failure from a Previous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Graft failure (GF) is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). In the absence of autologous recovery, a second HCT is necessary to attempt to prevent death due to prolonged pancytopenia. Previous studies describing outcomes of second HCT performed after GF with different types of donor sources report widely ranging overall survival (OS) and transplantation-related mortality (TRM); however, studies including a large number of patients undergoing a second HCT with umbilical cord blood (UCB) as the graft source are scarce. This study examined UCB transplantation (UCBT) performed after GF following a previous HCT. This retrospective registry-based study used data extracted from Eurocord and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) databases to evaluate outcomes of 247 UCBTs performed in EBMT transplant centers after GF following a previous HCT. Data were analyzed separately for patients with malignant diseases (n = 141) and those with nonmalignant diseases (n = 106). The most frequent HCT that resulted in GF was also UCBT (65.0% for patients with malignant diseases and 68.9% for those with nonmalignant diseases), and most GFs occurred within 100 days after transplantation (92.3% and 85.9%, respectively). The median follow-up was 47 months for surviving patients with malignant diseases and 38 months for those with nonmalignant diseases. We observed a similar cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment of 59.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51.4% to 67.9%) and 60.4% (95% CI, 51.7%-70.6%), respectively, at a median time of 23 days and 24 days, respectively. The 3-year OS was 28.9% (95% CI, 21.8% to 37.3%) in the malignant disease group and 49.1% (95% CI, 39.5%-58.8%) in the nonmalignant disease group. In patients with malignancies, TRM was 39.9% (95% CI, 32.5% to 49.1%) at 100 days and 57.5% (95% CI, 49.4%-66.8%) at 3 years. In multivariate analyses, none of the characteristics studied was statistically significantly associated with engraftment or OS. Although survival is not optimal in patients requiring a second HCT, UCBT remains a valid life-saving option for patients with GF.

Salvage HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide for graft failure in non-malignant disorders

Graft failure requires urgent salvage HSCT, but there is no universally accepted approach for this situation. We investigated T-cell replete haploidentical HSCT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide following serotherapy-based, radiation-free, reduced intensity conditioning in children with non-malignant disorders who had rejected their primary graft. Twelve patients with primary or secondary graft failure received T-cell replete bone marrow grafts from haploidentical donors and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide. The recommended conditioning regimen comprised rituximab 375 mg/m2, alemtuzumab 0.4 mg/kg, fludarabine 150 mg/m2, treosulfan 20-24 g/m2 and cyclophosphamide 29 mg/kg. After a median follow-up of 26 months (7-95), eleven of twelve patients (92%) are alive and well with complete donor chimerism in ten. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were observed in all patients after a median of 18 days (15-61) and 39 days (15-191), respectively. Acute GVHD grade I was observed in 1/12 patients (8%) and mild chronic GVHD in 1/12 patients (8%). Viral reactivations and disease were frequent complications at 75% and 42%, respectively, but no death from infectious causes occurred. In summary, this retrospective analysis demonstrates that a post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-based HLA-haploidentical salvage HSCT after irradiation-free conditioning results in excellent engraftment and overall survival in children with non-malignant diseases.

Graft Failure in Patients With Hematological Malignancies: A Successful Salvage With a Second Transplantation From a Different Haploidentical Donor

Graft failure (GF) is a fatal complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation, especially after haploidentical transplantation. The mortality of GF is nearly 100% without an effective salvage method. A second transplantation is usually necessary to save the patient's life. However, there is no standardized regimen, and the outcome is usually disappointing. We report on a prospective single-center study using a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen with different haploidentical donors (HIDs). Patients with GF after the first transplantation were enrolled in a prospective single-arm clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.Gov ID: NCT03717545) at the Peking University Institute of Hematology. The conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine (30 mg/m²) (days-6 to-2) and cyclophosphamide (1,000 mg/m²/day) (days-5 to-4). Patients underwent a second transplant from a different HID using a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor primed bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cells. The primary outcome was neutrophil engraftment at day 28. The secondary outcomes included platelet engraftment at day 100, transplant-related mortality (TRM) at day 30, TRM at day 100, and overall survival (OS) at 1 year. From March 2018 to June 2020, 13 patients were enrolled in this clinical trial. Of the 13 patients, five had acute myeloid leukemia, five had acute lymphoblastic leukemia, two had myelodysplastic syndromes, and one had a non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The median age at first transplantation was 38 years (range, 8-55 years). As for the first transplantation, 11 patients underwent haploidentical transplantations and two underwent unrelated donor transplantations. At the time of GF, three patients had complete donor chimerism, five had mixed chimerism, and five had complete recipient chimerism. The median time from the first transplantation to the second transplantation was 49 (range 35-120) days. The medians of infused cell doses were as follows: mononuclear cells 7.93 (5.95-12.51) × 10⁸/kg and CD34 + cells 2.28 (0.75-5.57) × 10⁶/kg. All 13 patients achieved neutrophil engraftment after the second transplantation, with a median engraftment time of 11 (range 10-20) days after transplantation. The platelet engraftment rate on day 100 after transplantation was 76.9%. The TRMs at day 30, day 100, and 1-year were 0, 0, and 23.1%, respectively. The OS and disease-free survival at 1-year were 56.6 and 48.4%, respectively. For patients with GF after first transplantation, a second transplantation using a fludarabine/cyclophosphamide regimen from a different HID was a promising salvage option. Further investigation is needed to confirm the suitability of this method.

The impact of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies in salvage haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide in patients with nonmalignant disorders

The presence of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) has been recognized as a major risk factor for graft failure (GF) after haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (haplo-PTCy). However, the role of DSAs in salvage haplo-PTCy for rescuing patients with nonmalignant disorders (NMDs) has not yet been reported. The present study retrospectively analyzed 22 patients with NMDs who underwent salvage haplo-PTCy from January 2008 to December 2017. The median age at the time of the rescue haplo-PTCy was 9 years (range, 1-26 years). Median time from the first transplant to second haplo-PTCy was 56 days (range, 37-591 days). Among all patients, six (27.3%) had DSAs, with a median DSA strength (mean fluorescence intensity [MFI]) of 5201 (range, 1412-11,543) in the first DSA testing. In addition, the median DSA MFI was 2672 (range, 832-10,498) before the bone marrow infusion. Overall, GF occurred in 5 (25%) of the 20 assessable patients. Three of four (75%) patients with DSAs experienced GF versus 2 of 16 (12.5%) DSA-negative patients (P = 0.032). The median DSA MFI for patients with GF was 6437 (range, 1412-10,498) versus 1845 (range, 832-2672) for those who engrafted or had early death (P = 0.030). One-year event-free survival was significantly lower in DSA-positive patients than in those without DSAs (16.7% vs. 62.5%, P = 0.002). DSA-negative patients had an acceptable 1-year survival of 62.5%. In conclusion, this study suggests that DSAs may be associated with deleterious outcomes after salvage haplo-PTCy in patients with NMDs.

Prognostic factors for neutrophil engraftment after haploidentical cell transplantation with PT-Cy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission, on behalf of the ALWP-EBMT

The use of haplo-HCT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is a new standard in the treatment of hematological diseases. A paucity of data exists on risk factors for engraftment failure in haplo-HCT with PT-Cy. We analyzed 1939 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received a first haplo-HCT from 2010 to 2019. Status at haplo-HCT was first complete remission (CR1) in 72.5% of patients, secondary AML was reported in 9.9%. Median follow-up was 24.4 months and median age at haplo-HCT was 51 years. Stem cell source was bone marrow (BM) in 42% and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) in 58%, and 64% of patients received a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen. Cumulative incidence of primary graft failure (GF) was 6%; GF was reported in 110 patients and 54 died before day +30 with no sign of cell recovery. Overall, 33 patients underwent a second HCT in a median time of 45 days and 13 were alive at last follow-up, the 2-year overall survival (OS) after second HCT being 32.4%. In multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with the risk of nonengraftment were: secondary AML (HR 1.30, p = 0.003), use of RIC (HR 1.22, p < 0.001), and use of BM (HR 1.21, p < 0.001). At 2 years, leukemia-free survival (LFS) and OS for the entire population was 55.2% (95% CI: 52.6-57.6) and 60.9% (95% CI: 58.4-63.3), respectively. Incidence of GF after haplo-HCT with PT-Cy is lower than reported T-cell-depleted haplo-HCT. Optimization of conditioning regimen and graft source should be considered for reducing the risk of GF in haplo-HCT recipients using PT-Cy.

Second haploidentical stem cell transplantation for primary graft failure

We report the outcome of 19 patients who experienced primary graft failure (PrGF) after a haploidentical (HAPLO), unmanipulated bone marrow transplant. The median age of patients was 52 years; the conditioning regimen of the first HAPLO transplant was either full dose total body irradiation (TBI) or fludarabine, busulfan, and thiotepa (TBF); PTCY was given to all patients together with cyclosporine and mycophenolate. All 19 patients with PrGF received a second HAPLO graft, at a median interval of 42 days (34-82) after HSCT, using the Baltimore protocol and G-CSF mobilized PB from the same (n = 13) or another HAPLO family donor (n = 6). GvHD prophylaxis was again PTCY-based; 14/19 patients had trilineage recovery (74%) and 1-year survival was 66%. Engraftment at second HAPLO was seen in 7/8 patient with, and in 5/7 patients without donor-specific antibodies (DSA). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis on the original group of 503 patients, there was a trend for a reduced dose of busulfan, to increase the risk of PrGF (p = 0.1). In conclusion, patients with PrGF following a HAPLO transplant, can be rescued with a second early HAPLO transplant, using the same or a different donor.

Impact of CD34 Cell Dose and Conditioning Regimen on Outcomes after Haploidentical Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Relapsed/Refractory Severe Aplastic Anemia

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening disease that can be cured with allogeneic cell transplantation (HCT). Haploidentical donor transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (haplo-PTCy) is an option for patients lacking an HLA-matched donor. We analyzed 87 patients who underwent haplo-PTCy between 2010 and 2019. The median patient age was 14 years (range, 1 to 69 years), most were heavily transfused, and all received previous immunosuppression (25% without antithymocyte globulin). Almost two-thirds (63%) received standard fludarabine (Flu)/cyclophosphamide (Cy) 29/total body irradiation (TBI) 200 cGy conditioning, and the remaining patients received an augmented conditioning: Flu/Cy29/TBI 300-400 (16%), Flu/Cy50/TBI 200 (10%), or Flu/Cy50/TBI 400 (10%). All patients received PTCy-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Most grafts (93%) were bone marrow (BM). The median duration of follow-up was 2 years and 2 months. The median time to neutrophil recovery was 17 days. Primary graft failure occurred in 15% of the patients, and secondary or poor graft function occurred in 5%. The incidences of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 14%, and that of chronic GVHD was 9%. Two-year overall survival and event-free survival (EFS) were 79% and 70%, respectively. EFS was higher for patients who received augmented Flu/Cy/TBI (hazard ratio [HR], .28; P = .02), and those who received higher BM CD34 cell doses (>3.2 × 10E6/kg) (HR, .29; P = .004). The presence of donor-specific antibodies before HSCT was associated with lower EFS (HR, 3.92; P = .01). Graft failure (HR, 7.20; P < .0001) was associated with an elevated risk of death. Cytomegalovirus reactivation was frequent (62%). Haploidentical HCT for SAA is a feasible procedure; outcomes are improved with augmented conditioning regimens and BM grafts with higher CD34 cell doses.

Comparison of immunosuppressant regimens in salvage cord blood transplantation for graft failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Graft failure (GF) is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Although salvage cord blood transplantation (CBT) is a curative therapy for GF, the optimal immunosuppression after salvage CBT remains unknown. Using nationwide registration data, we compared the transplant outcomes of patients who developed GF and underwent salvage CBT using immunosuppressants, including calcineurin (CNI) alone (n = 177); CNI plus methotrexate (CNI+MTX, n = 150); and CNI plus mycophenolate mofetil (CNI+MMF, n = 161). The CNI+MMF group, in comparison with the CNI+MTX and CNI alone groups, demonstrated better neutrophil recovery at 30 days (62.7 vs. 42.7 vs. 53.1%, P < 0.001); better overall survival (OS) at 12 months (48.4 vs. 33.5 vs. 28.3%, P < 0.001); and lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 12 months (35.2 vs. 53.9 vs. 56.5%, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, CNI+MMF had the best neutrophil recovery (hazard ratio (HR), 1.71; P < 0.001) and OS (HR, 0.64; P = 0.002) and the lowest NRM (HR, 0.53; P < 0.001). Hemorrhage was relatively less frequent in the CNI+MMF group. CNI+MMF can be a promising immunosuppressant regimen after salvage CBT for GF, with better engraftment and survival outcomes, compared with CNI alone and CNI+MTX.

Comparison of the outcomes after haploidentical and cord blood salvage transplantations for graft failure following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Graft failure (GF) is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Although salvage SCTs can be performed with haploidentical donor (HID) or cord blood (CB), no study has compared the performances of these two sources. Using nationwide registration data, we compared the transplant outcomes of patients who developed GF and underwent salvage transplantation from HID (n = 129) and CB (n = 570) from 2007 to 2016. The HID group demonstrated better neutrophil recovery (79.7 vs. 52.5% at 30 days, P < 0.001). With a median follow-up of 3 years, both groups demonstrated similar overall survival (OS) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM; 1-year OS, 33.1 vs. 34.6% and 1-year NRM, 45.1 vs. 49.8% for the HID and CB groups). After adjustments for other covariates, OS did not differ in both groups. However, HID was associated with a lower NRM (hazard ratio, 0.71; P = 0.038) than CB. The incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-related deaths was significantly higher in the HID group, although infection-related deaths were observed more frequently in the CB group. HID may be a promising salvage SCT option after GF due to its faster engraftment and low NRM.