Mastrotheodoros S, Boks MP, Rousseau C, Meeus W, Branje S. Negative parenting, epigenetic age, and psychological problems: prospective associations from adolescence to young adulthood.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2023;
64:1446-1461. [PMID:
37203368 DOI:
10.1111/jcpp.13821]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Epigenetic clocks are based on DNA methylation levels of several genomic loci and have been developed as indices of biological aging. Studies examining the effects of stressful environmental exposures have shown that stress is associated with differences between epigenetic age and chronological age (i.e., Epigenetic Age acceleration, EA). This pre-registered longitudinal study examined the long-term effects of negative parenting and psychological problems throughout adolescence (ages 13-17 years) on EA in late adolescence (age 17 years) and EA changes from late adolescence to young adulthood (age 25 years). Further, it examined how (change in) EA is related to changes in psychological problems from adolescence to young adulthood.
METHODS
We used data from a sample of 434 participants followed from age 13 to age 25, with saliva collected at ages 17 and 25. We estimated EA using four commonly used epigenetic clocks and analyzed the data using Structural Equation Modeling.
RESULTS
While negative parenting was not related to EA nor change in EA, (change in) EA was related to developmental indices such as externalizing problems and self-concept clarity.
CONCLUSIONS
Declining psychological well-being during young adulthood was preceded by EA.
Collapse