Lysophosphatidic acid receptor-2 (LPA2) and LPA5 regulate cellular functions during tumor progression in fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells

Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor Antagonists and Cancer: The Current Trends, Clinical Implications, and Trials

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a bioactive lipid mediator primarily derived from membrane phospholipids. LPA initiates cellular effects upon binding to a family of G protein-coupled receptors, termed LPA receptors (LPAR1 to LPAR6). LPA signaling drives cell migration and proliferation, cytokine production, thrombosis, fibrosis, angiogenesis, and lymphangiogenesis. Since the expression and function of LPA receptors are critical for cellular effects, selective antagonists may represent a potential treatment for a broad range of illnesses, such as cardiovascular diseases, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, voiding dysfunctions, and various types of cancers. More new LPA receptor antagonists have shown their therapeutic potentials, although most are still in the preclinical trial stage. This review provided integrative information and summarized preclinical findings and recent clinical trials of different LPA receptor antagonists in cancer progression and resistance. Targeting LPA receptors can have potential applications in clinical patients with various diseases, including cancer.

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptor modulators: Structural features and recent development

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) activates six LPA receptors (LPAR_1-6) and regulates various cellular activities such as cell proliferation, cytoprotection, and wound healing. Many studies elucidated the pathological outcomes of LPA are due to the alteration in signaling pathways, which include migration and invasion of cancer cells, fibrosis, atherosclerosis, and inflammation. Current pathophysiological research on LPA and its receptors provides a means that LPA receptors are new therapeutic targets for disorders associated with LPA. Various chemical modulators are developed and are under investigation to treat a wide range of pathological complications. This review summarizes the physiological and pathological roles of LPA signaling, development of various LPA modulators, their structural features, patents, and their clinical outcomes.

Six Immune Associated Genes Construct Prognostic Model Evaluate Low-Grade Glioma

Background

The immunotherapy of Glioma has always been a research hotspot. Although tumor associated microglia/macrophages (TAMs) proves to be important in glioma progression and drug resistance, our knowledge about how TAMs influence glioma remains unclear. The relationship between glioma and TAMs still needs further study.

Methods

We collected the data of TAMs in glioma from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) that included 20 glioma samples and 15 control samples from four datasets. Six genes were screened from the Differential Expression Gene through Gene ontology (GO) analysis, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis, protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and single-cell sequencing analysis. A risk score was then constructed based on the six genes and patients' overall survival rates of 669 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The efficacy of the risk score in prognosis and prediction was verified in Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA).

Results

Six genes, including CD163, FPR3, LPAR5, P2ry12, PLAUR, SIGLEC1, that participate in signal transduction and plasma membrane were selected. Half of them, like CD163, FPR3, SIGLEC1, were mainly expression in M2 macrophages. FPR3 and SIGLEC1 were high expression genes in glioma associated with grades and IDH status. The overall survival rates of the high risk score group was significantly lower than that of the low risk score group, especially in LGG.

Conclusion

Joint usage of the 6 candidate genes may be an effective method to diagnose and evaluate the prognosis of glioma, especially in Low-grade glioma (LGG).

Establishment of a Jaw Fibrosarcoma Patient-Derived Xenograft and Evaluation of the Tumor Suppression Efficacy of Plumbagin Against Jaw Fibrosarcoma

Background: Head and neck fibrosarcoma is a rare malignant tumor, accounting for about 1% of all head and neck tumors. It can also occur in the jaw bone, for which surgical resection is the main treatment but the recurrence rate is high and the prognosis is usually poor. Due to the lack of models mimicking the biological characteristics of the tumor, there is little progress in the research of the pathogenesis and treatment of fibrosarcoma. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore a high-fidelity model that can reflect the biological characteristics of fibrosarcoma for the sake of improving the therapeutic outcome and prognosis, and preventing recurrence. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) may more accurately reflect the human disease, and is an attractive platform to study disease biology and develop treatments and biomarkers. In this study we describe the establishment of jaw fibrosarcoma PDX models and compare PDX tumors to those of human origin.

Methods: Tumor biopsies from a patient with jaw fibrosarcoma were implanted in immunodeficient mice. Primary and PDX tumors were characterized extensively by histology, immunohistochemistry and humanized identification. Based on the finding of our previous preliminary research that plumbagin had an anti-tumor effect against head and neck cancer, we used this model in the present study to evaluate the anti-tumor effect of plumbagin on jaw fibrosarcoma.

Results: The established PDX model maintained the histological and immunohistochemical characteristics of the primary tumor. Plumbagin significantly inhibited the tumor growth in the jaw fibrosarcoma PDX model.

Conclusion: We successfully established a PDX model of jaw fibrosarcoma and demonstrated that this PDX model preserved the important molecular characteristics of the human primary tumor, thus providing a powerful tool for treatment research and new drug development of jaw fibrosarcoma. In addition, plumbagin was found to have an inhibitory effect on the growth of PDX modeled jaw fibrosarcoma, which provides a preliminary research basis for its clinical application.

Cooperation of G12/13 and Gi proteins via lysophosphatidic acid receptor-2 (LPA2) signaling enhances cancer cell survival to cisplatin

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) through six subtypes of G protein-coupled LPA receptors (LPA₁ to LPA₆) mediates a variety of cancer cell functions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cooperative effects of G12/13 and Gi proteins through LPA₂ on cancer cell survival to cisplatin (CDDP). In cell survival assay, cells were treated with CDDP every 24 h for 2 days. The long-term CDDP treated (HT-CDDP) cells established from fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells were pretreated with an LPA₂ agonist, GRI-977143. The cell survival rate to CDDP of HT-CDDP cells was significantly increased by GRI-977143. The elevated cell survival to CDDP was suppressed by LPA₂ knockdown. Since G12/13 protein stimulates Rho-mediated signaling, RhoA and RhoC knockdown cells were generated from HT1080 cells (HT1080-RhoA and HT1080-RhoC cells, respectively). In the presence of GRI-977143, HT1080-RhoA and HT1080-RhoC cells showed the low cell survival rates to CDDP. On the other hand, Gi protein inhibits adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity. Before cell survival assay, cells were treated with a Gi protein inhibitor, pertussis toxin (PTX) for 24 h. The cell survival rate to CDDP of HT1080 cells was significantly reduced by PTX. Furthermore, when HT1080-RhoA and HT1080-RhoC cells were pretreated with PTX, the cell survival rates to CDDP of both cells were markedly inhibited by PTX. The present results suggest that cooperation of G12/13 and Gi proteins activated by LPA₂ enhances the cell survival of HT1080 cells treated with CDDP.

Lysophosphatidic Acid Regulates the Differentiation of Th2 Cells and Its Antagonist Suppresses Allergic Airway Inflammation

BACKGROUND

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), a prototypic member of a large family of lysophospholipids, has been recently shown to play a role in immune responses to respiratory diseases. The involvement of LPA in allergic airway inflammation has been reported, but the mechanism remains unclear.

OBJECT

We analyzed the biological activity of LPA in vitro and in vivo and investigated its role in allergic inflammation in mice using an LPA receptor 2 (LPA2) antagonist.

METHODS

We used a murine model with acute allergic inflammation, in which mice are sensitized and challenged with house dust mite, and analyzed airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), pathological findings, Th2 cytokines, and IL-33 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and lung homogenates. The effect of LPA on Th2 differentiation and cytokine production was examined in vitro using naive CD4+ T cells isolated from splenocytes. We also investigated in vivo the effects of LPA on intranasal administration in mice.

RESULTS

The LPA2 antagonist suppressed the increase of AHR, the number of total cells, and eosinophils in BALF and lung tissue. It also decreased the production of IL-13 in BALF and IL-33 and CCL2 in the lung. LPA promoted Th2 cell differentiation and IL-13 production by Th2 cells in vitro. Nasal administration of LPA significantly increased the number of total cells and IL-13 in BALF via regulating the production of IL-33 and CCL-2-derived infiltrating macrophages.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that LPA plays an important role in allergic airway inflammation and that the blockade of LPA2 might have therapeutic potential for bronchial asthma.

Different effects of lysophosphatidic acid receptor-2 (LPA2) and LPA5 on the regulation of chemoresistance in colon cancer cells

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a simple physiological lipid and exhibits several biological functions by binding to G-protein-coupled LPA receptors (LPA receptor-1 (LPA₁) to LPA₆). The present study aimed to evaluate whether LPA signaling via LPA₂ and LPA₅ is involved in the chemoresistance to anticancer drugs in colon cancer DLD1 cells. In cell survival assay, cells were treated with fluorouracil (5-FU) every 24 h for 2 days. The cell survival rate to 5-FU of DLD1 cells was significantly decreased by LPA treatment. In the presence of LPA, the cell survival rate to 5-FU was significantly elevated by LPA₅ knockdown. Before initiation of the cell survival assay, cells were pretreated with an LPA₂ agonist, GRI-977143. The cell survival rate to 5-FU was markedly increased in DLD1 cells treated with GRI-977143. In the presence of GRI-977143, the elevated cell survival rate of DLD1 cells was reduced by LPA₂ knockdown. To assess the effects of LPA₂ and LPA₅ on the enhancement of chemoresistance, long-term 5-FU treated (DLD-5FU) cells were generated from DLD1 cells. The cell survival rate to 5-FU of DLD-5FU cells were significantly elevated by LPA₅ knockdown. GRI-977143 treatment increased the cell survival rate to 5-FU of DLD-5FU cells. These results suggest that LPA₂ promotes and LPA₅ suppresses the acquisition of chemoresistance in colon cancer cells treated with anticancer drugs.

Effects of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptor-2 (LPA2) and LPA3 on the regulation of chemoresistance to anticancer drug in lung cancer cells

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) mediates a variety of biological functions via the binding of G protein-coupled LPA receptors (LPA receptor-1 (LPA₁) to LPA₆). This study aimed to investigate the roles of LPA₂ and LPA₃ in the modulation of chemoresistance to anticancer drug in lung cancer A549 cells. In cell survival assay, cells were treated with cisplatin (CDDP) every 24 h for 2 days. The cell survival rate to CDDP of A549 cells was significantly elevated by an LPA₂ agonist, GRI-977143. To evaluate the roles of LPA₂-mediated signaling in cell survival during tumor progression, highly migratory (A549-R10) cells were generated from A549 cells. In the presence of GRI-977143, the cell survival rate to CDDP of A549-R10 cells were markedly higher than that of A549 cells, correlating with LPAR2 expression level. Moreover, to assess the effects of long-term anticancer drug treatment on cell survival, the long-term CDDP treated (A549-CDDP) cells were established from A549 cells. The cell survival rate to CDDP of A549-CDDP cells was elevated by GRI-977143. Since LPAR3 expression level was significantly higher in A549-CDDP cells than in A549 cells, we investigated the roles of LPA₃ in the cell survival to CDDP of A549 cells, using an LPA₃ agonist, 1-oleoyl-2-methyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphothionate ((2S)-OMPT). The cell survival rate to CDDP of A549 cells was significantly reduced by (2S)-OMPT treatment. In the presence of (2S)-OMPT, the cell survival rate to CDDP of A549 cells was elevated by LPA₃ knockdown. These results suggest that LPA signaling via LPA₂ and LPA₃ is involved in the regulation of chemoresistance in A549 cells treated with CDDP.

Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor 5 (LPAR5) Plays a Significance Role in Papillary Thyroid Cancer via Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Pathway

Background

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine system malignancy. Scientists have done considerable research into the molecular mechanisms involved, but many mechanisms remain undiscovered.

Material/Methods

We performed a comprehensive analysis of the whole-transcriptome resequencing derived from thyroid tissues and paired papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and showed that lysophosphatidic acid receptor 5 (LPAR5) is strongly overexpressed in thyroid carcinoma. Then, we used TPC-1 and KTC-1 to explore the effect of LPAR5 knockdown on colony formation, migration, proliferation, invasion, and apoptosis of PTC cell line cells. AKT activator was used for the recovery test. Finally, we designed proteomic experiments to explore the role of LPAR5 in the AKT pathway and the EMT process.

Results

Cell function experiments showed that LPAR5 knockdown can significantly induce apoptosis of KTC-1 and TPC-1 cells. Furthermore, LPAR5 can promote PTC metastasis and tumorigenesis by activating the PI3K/AKT pathway and decreasing its cancer-promoting effect when using AKT agonist. We also found that LPAR5 can regulate the expression of EMT-related proteins, which affect invasion and migration.

Conclusions

In summary, downregulation of LPAR5 expression can inhibit the physiological process of PTC, and this phenomenon is related to the PI3K/AKT pathway and EMT.

LPA receptor1 antagonists as anticancer agents suppress human lung tumours

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), as a bioactive lipid, plays a variety of physiological and pathological roles via activating six types of G-protein-coupled LPA receptors (LPA1-6). Our preliminary study found that LPA1 is highly expressed in lung cancer tissues compared with paracancerous tissues, but the role of LPA1 in lung carcinoma is unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the association between LPA1 and lung tumour behaviour at the cellular and animal model levels. We found that LPA promoted the migration, proliferation and colony formation of a lung cancer cell line (A549). LPA1 and LPA3 are preferentially expressed in A549 cells, and both Ki16425 (LPA1 and LPA3 antagonist) and ono7300243 (LPA1 antagonist) completely blocked the LPA-induced actions. These results were further verified by experiments of the LPA1/3 overexpression and LPA1 knockdown A549 cells. Furthermore, LPA1 overexpression and knockdown A549 cells were used to assess the in vivo tumour-bearing animal model and the mechanism underlying LPA-induced actions. In the animal model, A549 cell-derived tumour volume was significantly increased by LPA1 overexpression and significantly decreased by LPA1 knockdown respectively, suggesting that LPA1 is a regulator of in vivo tumour formation. Our results also indicated that the LPA1/Gi/MAP kinase/NF-κB pathway is involved in LPA-induced oncogenic actions in A549 cells. Thus, targeting LPA1 may be a novel strategy for treating lung carcinoma.

An Updated Review of Lysophosphatidylcholine Metabolism in Human Diseases

Lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) is increasingly recognized as a key marker/factor positively associated with cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. However, findings from recent clinical lipidomic studies of LPC have been controversial. A key issue is the complexity of the enzymatic cascade involved in LPC metabolism. Here, we address the coordination of these enzymes and the derangement that may disrupt LPC homeostasis, leading to metabolic disorders. LPC is mainly derived from the turnover of phosphatidylcholine (PC) in the circulation by phospholipase A₂ (PLA₂). In the presence of Acyl-CoA, lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase (LPCAT) converts LPC to PC, which rapidly gets recycled by the Lands cycle. However, overexpression or enhanced activity of PLA₂ increases the LPC content in modified low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and oxidized LDL, which play significant roles in the development of atherosclerotic plaques and endothelial dysfunction. The intracellular enzyme LPCAT cannot directly remove LPC from circulation. Hydrolysis of LPC by autotaxin, an enzyme with lysophospholipase D activity, generates lysophosphatidic acid, which is highly associated with cancers. Although enzymes with lysophospholipase A₁ activity could theoretically degrade LPC into harmless metabolites, they have not been found in the circulation. In conclusion, understanding enzyme kinetics and LPC metabolism may help identify novel therapeutic targets in LPC-associated diseases.