Modulation of G-protein-coupled receptor 55-mediated signaling by regulator of G-protein signaling 2

Function and regulation of RGS family members in solid tumours: a comprehensive review

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play a key role in regulating the homeostasis of the internal environment and are closely associated with tumour progression as major mediators of cellular signalling. As a diverse and multifunctional group of proteins, the G protein signalling regulator (RGS) family was proven to be involved in the cellular transduction of GPCRs. Growing evidence has revealed dysregulation of RGS proteins as a common phenomenon and highlighted the key roles of these proteins in human cancers. Furthermore, their differential expression may be a potential biomarker for tumour diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Most importantly, there are few systematic reviews on the functional/mechanistic characteristics and clinical application of RGS family members at present. In this review, we focus on the G-protein signalling regulator (RGS) family, which includes more than 20 family members. We analysed the classification, basic structure, and major functions of the RGS family members. Moreover, we summarize the expression changes of each RGS family member in various human cancers and their important roles in regulating cancer cell proliferation, stem cell maintenance, tumorigenesis and cancer metastasis. On this basis, we outline the molecular signalling pathways in which some RGS family members are involved in tumour progression. Finally, their potential application in the precise diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of different types of cancers and the main possible problems for clinical application at present are discussed. Our review provides a comprehensive understanding of the role and potential mechanisms of RGS in regulating tumour progression. Video Abstract.

Interactions between lysophosphatidylinositol receptor GPR55 and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor S1P5 in live cells

Lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI) and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) are bioactive lipids implicated in various cellular events including proliferation, migration, and cancer progression. LPI and S1P act as ligands for G-protein coupled GPR55 and S1P receptors, respectively, and activate specific signaling pathways. Both receptors are highly expressed in various cancer tissues and associated with tumor progression. However, physical and functional crosstalk between the two receptors has not been elucidated to date. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) experiments in the current study showed that S1P₅ strongly and specifically interacts with GPR55. We observed co-internalization of both receptors upon agonist stimulation. Notably, activation of one receptor induced co-internalization of the partner receptor. Next, we examined functional crosstalk of the two receptors. Interestingly, while activation of the individual receptors augmented cell proliferation, ERK phosphorylation and cancer-associated gene expression in HCT116 cells, co-activation of both receptors inhibited these stimulatory effects. Our collective findings indicate that GPR55 and S1P₅ form a heterodimer and their co-activation attenuates the stimulatory activity of each receptor on colon cancer progression.

Transcriptomic Changes in Mouse Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages Exposed to Neuropeptide FF

Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) is a neuropeptide that regulates various biological activities. Currently, the regulation of NPFF on the immune system is an emerging field. However, the influence of NPFF on the transcriptome of primary macrophages has not been fully elucidated. In this study, the effect of NPFF on the transcriptome of mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) was explored by RNA sequencing, bioinformatics, and molecular simulation. BMDMs were treated with 1 nM NPFF for 18 h, followed by RNA sequencing. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained, followed by GO, KEGG, and PPI analysis. A total of eight qPCR-validated DEGs were selected as hub genes. Subsequently, the three-dimensional (3-D) structures of the eight hub proteins were constructed by Modeller and Rosetta. Next, the molecular dynamics (MD)-optimized 3-D structure of hub protein was acquired with Gromacs. Finally, the binding modes between NPFF and hub proteins were studied by Rosetta. A total of 2655 DEGs were obtained (up-regulated 1442 vs. down-regulated 1213), and enrichment analysis showed that NPFF extensively regulates multiple functional pathways mediated by BMDMs. Moreover, the 3-D structure of the hub protein was obtained after MD-optimization. Finally, the docking modes of NPFF-hub proteins were predicted. Besides, NPFFR2 was expressed on the cell membrane of BMDMs, and NPFF 1 nM significantly activated NPFFR2 protein expression. In summary, instead of significantly inhibiting the expression of the immune-related gene transcriptome of RAW 264.7 cells, NPFF simultaneously up-regulated and down-regulated the gene expression profile of a large number of BMDMs, hinting that NPFF may profoundly affect a variety of cellular processes dominated by BMDMs. Our work provides transcriptomics clues for exploring the influence of NPFF on the physiological functions of BMDMs.