A differential evolution approach to estimate parameters in a temperature-dependent kinetic model for second generation ethanol production under high cell density with Spathaspora passalidarum

First- and second-generation integrated process for bioethanol production: Fermentation of molasses diluted with hemicellulose hydrolysate by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The integration of first- (1G) and second-generation (2G) ethanol production by adding sugarcane juice or molasses to lignocellulosic hydrolysates offers the possibility to overcome the problem of inhibitors (acetic acid, furfural, hydroxymethylfurfural and phenolic compounds), and add nutrients (such as salts, sugars and nitrogen sources) to the fermentation medium, allowing the production of higher ethanol titers. In this work, an 1G2G production process was developed with hemicellulosic hydrolysate (HH) from a diluted sulfuric acid pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse and sugarcane molasses. The industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae CAT-1 was genetically modified for xylose consumption and used for co-fermentation of sucrose, fructose, glucose, and xylose. The fed-batch fermentation with high cell density that mimics an industrial fermentation was performed at bench scale fermenter, achieved high volumetric ethanol productivity of 1.59 g L-1 h-1, 0.39 g g-1 of ethanol yield, and 44.5 g L-1 ethanol titer, and shown that the yeast was able to consume all the sugars present in must simultaneously. With the results, it was possible to establish a mass balance for the global process: from pretreatment to the co-fermentation of molasses and HH, and it was possible to establish an effective integrated process (1G2G) with sugarcane molasses and HH co-fermentation employing a recombinant yeast.

An overview on fermentation strategies to overcome lignocellulosic inhibitors in second-generation ethanol production using cell immobilization

The development of technologies to ferment carbohydrates (mainly glucose and xylose) obtained from the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass for the production of second-generation ethanol (2G ethanol) has many economic and environmental advantages. The pretreatment step of this biomass is industrially performed mainly by steam explosion with diluted sulfuric acid and generates hydrolysates that contain inhibitory compounds for the metabolism of microorganisms, harming the next step of ethanol production. The main inhibitors are: organic acids, furan, and phenolics. Several strategies can be applied to decrease the action of these compounds in microorganisms, such as cell immobilization. Based on data published in the literature, this overview will address the relevant aspects of cell immobilization for the production of 2G ethanol, aiming to evaluate this method as a strategy for protecting microorganisms against inhibitors in different modes of operation for fermentation. This is the first overview to date that shows the relation between inhibitors, cells immobilization, and fermentation operation modes for 2G ethanol. In this sense, the state of the art regarding the main inhibitors in 2G ethanol and the most applied techniques for cell immobilization, besides batch, repeated batch and continuous fermentation using immobilized cells, in addition to co-culture immobilization and co-immobilization of enzymes, are presented in this work.

Secretome analysis as a tool to elucidate bacterial contamination influence during second-generation ethanol production in a Melle-Boinot process

Melle-boinot fermentation process can be used to increase the ethanol productivity in second-generation ethanol process (2G). However, bacterial contamination can result in decreased ethanol production and sugars consumption. The available literature on microbial contamination in the 2G at the secretome level, microbial interactions and their impacts on ethanol production are scarce. In this context, the cultivation of Spathaspora passalidarum was studied in pure and co-culture with Lactobacillus fermentum under conditions that mimic the Melle-boinot process. Glucose consumption and ethanol production by S. passalidarum were not affected by bacterial contamination. Xylose consumption was higher in pure culture (11.54 ± 2.62, 16.23 ± 1.76 and 6.50 ± 1.68 g) than in co-culture fermentation (11.89 ± 0.38, 7.29 ± 0.49 and 5.54 ± 2.63 g) in cycle 2. The protein profile of the fermented broth was similar in pure and co-culture fermentation. The low effect of L. fermentum on fermentation and protein profile may be associated with the inhibition of the bacteria by the low nutrient fermentation broth, with centrifugation and/or with sulfuric acid washing. Thereby, considering that research on microbial contamination in the 2G fermentation process is very limited, particularly at the omics level, these findings may contribute to the lignocellulosic biomass fermentation industry.