Varying reinforcer duration produces behavioral interactions during multiple schedules

Within- and between-session variety effects in a food-seeking habituation paradigm

Appetitive behavior is stronger when organisms are given a variety of foods than when they are repeatedly given the same food (the variety effect). Two experiments examined the variety effect in an operant food-seeking task. In both experiments, rats received a 45-mg food pellet for every 4th lever press over a series of daily 30-min sessions. The rats responded at a high rate early in the session, but the rate declined systematically over time within the session. In Experiment 1, alternating unpredictably between grain and sucrose pellets caused a higher level of responding, and a slower within-session decline in responding, than presenting either type of pellet consistently. In groups receiving one pellet consistently, a switch to the alternate pellet caused lawful changes in response rate that reflected both habituation and incentive contrast processes. In Experiment 2, an experimental group received grain only and sucrose only in daily alternating sessions. In sucrose sessions, they responded more than controls that always received either sucrose or grain (a type of variety effect); in grain sessions, they responded less than the controls. The results indicated a within-session variety effect that was controlled by habituation processes and a between-session variety effect that was controlled by incentive contrast. Both types of processes can come into play when organisms are exposed to food variety.

Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: satiation and habituation have different implications for theory and practice

Reinforcers lose their effectiveness when they are presented repeatedly. Early researchers labeled this loss of effectiveness as satiation without conducting an experimental analysis. When such an analysis is conducted, habituation provides a more precise and empirically accurate label for the changes in reinforcer effectiveness. This paper reviews some of the data that suggest that habituation occurs to repeatedly presented reinforcers. It also argues that habituation has surprisingly different implications than satiation for theory and practice in behavior analysis. For example, postulating that habituation occurs to repeatedly presented reinforcers suggests ways for maintaining the strength of an existing reinforcer and for weakening the strength of a problematic reinforcer that differ from those implied by an account in terms of satiation. An habituation account may also lead to different ways of conceptualizing the regulation of behavior. For example, habituation may be a single-process contributor to the termination of behaviors that are usually attributed to satiation (e.g., ingestive behaviors such as eating and drinking), fatigue (e.g., energetic behaviors such as running), the waning of attention (e.g., cognitive behaviors such as studying), and pharmacodynamic factors (e.g., drug taking).

Within-session patterns in variable-interval schedule performance: Variation with deprivation level

Previous research has shown that patterns in operant responding may change within the course of individual experimental sessions. The proper interpretation of such changes is controversial. At least one source of this controversy may lie in unstated experimental practices across laboratories, as published reports often have failed to detail important particulars of deprivation operations. The present study was aimed at gathering descriptive data on the contribution of deprivation operations to the observation of within-session changes. In two experiments, four food deprived pigeons were exposed to a multiple variable-interval 30-s variable-interval 30-s schedule of grain presentation, wherein each grain presentation was kept constant at 5s. In Condition I, a session-entry criterion was in place that permitted the pigeon access to the daily session only if its body weight fell within controlled limits. Within-session rates of responding were generally stable. In Condition II, the entry criterion was removed and experimental sessions were conducted 6 days per week. The effect of removing the session-entry criterion was to increase body weight for all birds and decrease food intake across conditions. With no session entry criterion, robust within-session changes were observed for three of the four pigeons. The results suggest that rich schedules of reinforcement often used in the analysis of within-session changes can produce substantial reductions in deprivation levels that require up to several days to reverse. Future experiments in this area should take precautions to insure that deprivation is tightly controlled and report such measures to eliminate potential errors in replication.