Quantitative measures of rheumatic diseases for clinical research versus standard clinical care: differences, advantages and limitations

Intense symptoms of pain are associated with poor sleep, fibromyalgia, depression and sleep apnea in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. A register-based study

OBJECTIVES

To study whether poor sleep and comorbidities are associated with high symptom levels of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) pain, patient global assessment and fatigue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), in a nation-wide cross-sectional setting.

METHODS

Clinical data were extracted from The Finnish Rheumatology Quality Register between 1.2021 and 9.2022. Self-reported sleep was categorized as "good" (little/no difficulties) or "poor" (great difficulties/can't) sleep. Data concerning comorbidities were collected from national registers. Descriptive statistics were used. Regression analyses were applied to analyze independent associations of sleep status, comorbidities and disease activity with pain in RA and PsA, adjusting for age and sex.

RESULTS

Among 13,512 patients with RA, 6052 [mean (SD) age 62 (13), 71% female] had sleep status reported; in PsA 1861/3636 [age 55 (13), 48% female]. In RA, 5072 (84%) reported good and 980 (16%) poor sleep; the corresponding numbers in PsA were 1460 (78%) and 401 (22%). Median values for objective disease activity were low and similar in patients with poor sleep and good sleep in both diseases. Among patients with no swollen joints, the median values for PROs were approximately three times higher for patients with poor sleep vs. good sleep in both diagnoses (P<0.001). In regression analyses, "poor" sleep was independently associated with higher symptoms in pain [B (95%CI) 20 (18,22) in RA and 23 (19, 26) in PsA], followed by comorbid fibromyalgia, as well as depression in RA and sleep apnea in PsA.

CONCLUSION

"Poor" sleep quality and comorbidities are independently associated with pain. Patient's sleep status is important to know especially in patients with severe symptoms without objective disease activity.

Impact of Tofacitinib on Components of the ACR Response Criteria: Posthoc Analysis of Phase III and Phase IIIb/IV Trials

Objective

Evaluate the impact of tofacitinib on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria components in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

This posthoc analysis pooled data from RA phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), adalimumab, or placebo, with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and a phase IIIb/IV RCT assessing tofacitinib 5 mg BID monotherapy, tofacitinib 5 mg BID with methotrexate, or adalimumab with methotrexate. Outcomes included: proportions of patients achieving ACR20/50/70 responses and ≥20/50/70% improvement rates in ACR components at Week 2 and Months 1, 3, and 6; mean percent improvement in ACR components and Clinical or Simplified Disease Activity Index (CDAI or SDAI) low disease activity or remission rates, at Month 3, for ACR20/50/70 responders.

Results

Across treatment groups, ≥20/50/70% improvement rates were numerically higher for most physician- versus patient-reported measures. In phase III RCTs, at earlier timepoints, ≥50/70% improvements in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Pain and Clinician Global Assessment were similar. Among ACR20 responders receiving tofacitinib, mean percent improvements for tender and swollen joint counts were >70% at Month 3. CDAI/SDAI remission was achieved by 27.8–45.0% of ACR70 responders receiving tofacitinib at Month 3.

Conclusion

Among ACR20 responders treated with tofacitinib, physician-reported components particularly exceeded 20% response improvement. At Month 3, disease state generally did not corroborate ACR70 response criteria. Divergences between physician- and patient-reported measures highlight the importance of identifying appropriate patient-reported outcome targets to manage RA symptoms in clinical practice.

Reduced cardiorespiratory fitness is a mediator of excess all-cause mortality in rheumatoid arthritis: the Trøndelag Health Study

Objectives

Investigate if low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) was associated with and acted as a mediator of excess all-cause mortality rate in persons suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared with the general population.

Methods

All-cause mortality was analysed using Cox regression modelling in patients with RA (n=348) and controls (n=60 938) who took part in the second (1995–1997) and third (2006–2008) waves of the longitudinal population-based Trøndelag Health Study in Norway. A mediation analysis was performed to investigate if excess relative risk of mortality in RA was mediated by low estimated CRF (eCRF).

Results

During the follow-up until 31 December 2018 (mean 19.3 years), the mortality rate among patients with RA (n=127, 36.5%) was higher than among controls (n=12 942, 21.2%) (p<0.001). Among controls and patients with RA, 51% and 26%, respectively, had eCRF above the median for their age and sex (p<0.001). The final Cox model included RA status and eCRF, adjusted for hypertension, body mass index, smoking, cholesterol, diabetes and creatinine. eCRF below median for sex and age category was associated with increased mortality (p<0.001). The total excess relative risk of mortality in patients with RA was 28% (95% CI 2% to 55%, p=0.035), in which RA itself contributed 5% and the direct and indirect contributions of low eCRF accounted for 23%.

Conclusions

Low eCRF was an important mediator of the increased all-cause mortality rate found in RA. Our data indicate that patients with RA should be given advice to perform physical activity that increases CRF, along with optimised treatment with antirheumatic drugs, from the time of diagnosis.

Validation of a Quality of Life Instrument in Spanish Patients With Rheumatic Diseases: The Rosser Classification System

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Rosser classification system for disease states in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

METHODS

Our study was based on a questionnaire validation design. Patients were attended at an outpatient rheumatology clinic at Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain. The Rosser classification system was completed by the physician from the research team (PMQ) and by the patient (HMQ). Criterion standards: The EuroQol-5D for the HMQ and the physician global estimate (DOCGL) for the PMQ. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach α. Test-retest reliability and interobserver reliability were analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. The criterion validity between HMQ and EuroQol-5D and between PMQ and DOCGL was assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The full analysis was based on 4 samples of patients (104 to 266 patients), most of whom were middle-aged women. For HMQ, Cronbach α was 0.70. Test-retest reproducibility was 0.7. With respect to criterion validity, significant correlations in the expected direction were observed. For PMQ, Cronbach α was 0.70, indicating excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability. With respect to criterion validity, strong correlations were observed between the PMQ and the DOCGL.

CONCLUSIONS

The Rosser classification system showed satisfactory reliability and suitable criterion validity for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The instrument seems to be suitable for clinical decision making and research.

Correlation between rapid-3, DAS28, CDAI and SDAI as a measure of disease activity in a cohort of Colombian patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The objective of this study is to correlate the patient-driven tool Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID-3) with other common tools used in daily practice to measure disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).One hundred nineteen RA patients according to 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria who consecutively attended a RA outpatient clinic between August and December 2015 were evaluated. Data was stored in an electronic form that included demographic information, comorbidities, concomitant medication, and laboratory results. The disease activity was determined by tender and swollen joint count, pain and disease activity visual analog scales (VAS), disease activity score 28 (DAS28), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ). Correlations between RAPID-3 and other disease activity tools were assessed. Mean age was 61 ± 13.8 years with a median disease duration of 14 years (IQR 5-21), 77% were females. Median scores were MDHAQ 0.5 (IQR 0.1-1.2), DAS 28 3.8 (IQR 2.7-5.1), and RAPID-3 12.3 (IQR 6-19). A strong correlation was obtained between RAPID-3 and DAS 28 (r 0.719, p < 0.001), CDAI (r 0.752, p < 0.001), and SDAI (r 0.758, p < 0.001). RAPID-3 had a high correlation with tools regularly used for disease activity assessment of RA patients in daily practice. The ease of its application favors routine use as it does not require laboratory results and joint counts.

A bibliometric study of the scientific publications on patient-reported outcomes in rheumatology

INTRODUCTION

We have conducted a bibliometric study of the scientific publications on patient-reported outcomes in the field of rheumatology.

METHODS

SCOPUS was the database used in this bibliometric study. We performed two searches. The main search involved selecting the documents published between 2000 and 2014 limited to top-tier journals addressing rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, using specific descriptors together with the operator and main descriptor "patient-reported outcomes" (PROs), and we performed a secondary search, with the following specific descriptors: "pain," "functional capacity," and "fatigue." We used bibliometric indicators for articles distribution (Price's law for the increase of scientific literature and Bradford's law for dispersion of articles). We also calculated the participation index of the different countries.

RESULTS

A total of 983 original articles were published between 2000 and 2014. Our results confirmed the fulfilment of Price's law (correlation coefficient r = 0.9385 after linear adjustment). The average number of articles per Bradford Zone was 327.6. A total of 30 different journals were published. The type of growth for the descriptors "pain" (r² = 0.5417 compared to r² = 0.4839) and "fatigue" (r² = 06276 compared to r² = 0.5544) is exponential, whereas it is linear for the descriptor "functional capacity" (r² = 0.6769 compared to r² = 0.3779).

DISCUSSION

This study revealed significant linear growth of patient-related outcomes in global terms, as well as upward trends for most of the citation-based bibliometric indices, especially significant from 2010 to 2014. Pain and fatigue have greater growth as PRO concepts.

Variability in the frequency of rheumatology consultations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Spain

The aim of this work was to assess the variability in the use of health-care resources, based on the number of visits to rheumatology departments by rheumatoid arthritis patients, in Spain, and its association with patient, physician and center characteristics. The sample consisted of patient records of men and women (aged 16 or older), with a clinical diagnosis of RA, who met the American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria and who had been treated in a rheumatology department at a Spanish hospital with at least one visit to a rheumatologist during the two years preceding the date of the study. To analyze which variables were independently associated with the number of consultations, those with a statistically significant result in the bivariate analysis, or which were clinically relevant or deemed confounders, were used in the construction of a linear regression model. The records of 1188 RA patients were studied. The linear regression model explained the 26.67 % of the variability in the number of visits. The number of csDMARDs prescribed, the administration of biological therapy, corticoid prescription, the presence of nursing consultation, mean time to first visit in the department and attended population showed a positive significant association, while the presence of telephone consultation, distance from the hospital to the patient´s residence (≥20 km) and drug monitoring by rheumatology department + primary care physician or by other specialists were negatively associated with the number of consultations. We observed a high variability in the number of visits, which remains partially unexplained even after taking into account individual, physician and center characteristics.

Prevalence and risk factors for patient-reported joint pain among patients with HIV/hepatitis C coinfection, hepatitis C monoinfection, and HIV monoinfection

BACKGROUND

To determine the prevalence of patient-reported joint pain among patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection, chronic HCV monoinfection, and HIV monoinfection followed in hepatology and infectious disease outpatient practices.

METHODS

Standardized interviews were performed among 79 HIV/HCV-coinfected, 93 HCV-monoinfected, and 30 HIV-monoinfected patients in a cross-sectional study within hepatology and infectious disease clinics at three centers. The Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire was used to ascertain joint pain and associated symptoms. Information on potential risk factors for joint pain was obtained during the interview and by chart review. Logistic regression was used to determine adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of joint pain associated with risk factors of interest among chronic HCV-infected and HIV-infected patients.

RESULTS

Joint pain was more commonly reported in HCV-monoinfected than HIV/HCV-coinfected (71% versus 56%; p = 0.038) and HIV-monoinfected (71% versus 50%; p = 0.035) patients. A previous diagnosis of arthritis and current smoking were risk factors for joint pain among HCV-infected patients (arthritis: aOR, 4.25; 95% CI, 1.84-9.81; smoking: aOR, 5.02; 95% CI, 2.15-11.74) and HIV-infected (arthritis: aOR, 5.36; 95% CI, 2.01-14.25; smoking: aOR, 6.07; 95% CI, 2.30-16.00) patients.

CONCLUSION

Patient-reported joint pain was prevalent among all three groups, but more common among chronic HCV-monoinfected than either HIV/HCV-coinfected or HIV-monoinfected patients. A prior diagnosis of arthritis and current smoking were risk factors for patient-reported joint pain among both HCV-infected and HIV-infected patients.

PROMs in inflammatory arthritis: moving from static to dynamic

There are several advantages in using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in standard clinical practice, particularly if a questionnaire is distributed to each patient at each visit as a standard in the infrastructure usual care. The patients, being the most knowledgeable persons concerning their pain and global estimate, do most of the work by completing a questionnaire. Completion of the questionnaire helps the patients prepare for their visit as well as improving doctor-patient communication. Recently, the role of PROMs has expanded from the static phase of capturing and measuring outcomes at a single point of time to a more dynamic role. This dynamic role is aiming at driving improvement not only in the quality of inflammatory arthritis care but also in the patients' reported experience. Therefore, in addition to its value in tailoring treatment targets adapted to the patient's needs, PROMs also have the potential of modifying the disease impact through improving the patients' adherence to therapy and allowing the patients to monitor the changes in their condition. Though more attention has been given to the use of PROMs in routine clinical care, little was published regarding what could be done with the plethora of data gained from PROMs and how dynamic it can be enhancing the "patient-centered care" approach and improving patients' experience. This article highlights the value of adopting PROMs for arthritic patients in standard clinical practice and its impact on long-term patients' management.

Usefulness of patients-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis focus group

Objective. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have become an essential part of the assessment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to evaluate the agreement and correlation between PROs and the physician's measurements. Methods. This was a cross-sectional analytical study in which 135 patients with RA were clinically evaluated during two different sessions of focus group interviews. Rheumatologist recorded 28 swollen (SJCs) and tender joint counts (TJCs). The patients filled out the PROs instruments (MDHAQ, RADAI, RAPID3, 4, and 5 and self-report articular index (SAI) diagram for pain and joint swelling). DAS28 was calculated (C-reactive protein). An adjusted multiple lineal regression model was done (DAS28 as dependent variable). Results. Highly significant agreements were found between SJC and TJC registered by the physician and patient. There was moderate correlation between DAS28 with patient SJC (r = 0.52), patient TJC (r = 0.55), RADAI (r = 0.56), RAPID3 (r = 0.52), RAPID4 (r = 0.56), RAPID5 (r = 0.66), and VAS-Global (r = 0.51). Likewise, we found moderate to high correlations between CDAI and SDAI with all variable measurements done by the patients. The resulting predictive equation was DAS28(CRP) = 2.02 + 0.037 × RAPID4 + 0.042× patient SJC. Conclusion. PROs applied in focus groups interview are a useful tool for managing patients with RA regardless of gender, educational level, and duration of disease.

Evaluation of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis by Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) and its correlation to Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI): an Indian experience

Serial objective assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is imperative to achieve remission. Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), an index without formal joint counts, appears attractive for evaluation of disease activity in RA patients in a busy clinical setting. This study aims to evaluate correlation and agreement of RAPID3 with Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) in RA patients. All patients completed a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) at each visit. A physician/assessor 28-joint count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were completed in 200 literate patients with RA to score DAS28, CDAI, and RAPID3. RAPID3 includes the three MDHAQ patient self-report RA core dataset measures for physical function, pain, and patient global estimate. Proposed RAPID3 (range, 0-30) severity categories of high (>12), moderate (6.1-12.0), low (3.1-6.0), and near remission (≤3) were compared to DAS28 (0-10) activity categories of high (> 5.1), moderate (3.21-5.1), low (2.61-3.2), and remission (≤ 2.6), and CDAI (0-76) categories of >22, 10.1-22.0, 2.9-10.0, and ≤2.8. Statistical significance was analyzed using Spearman correlations, cross-tabulations, and kappa statistics. Comparison of RAPID3 with DAS28 and CDAI indicated Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients for DAS28 with RAPID3 of 0.910, and for CDAI with RAPID3 of 0.907, all highly significant (P < 0.001). There was substantial agreement between RAPID3 and DAS28 (kappa value = 0.634, P < 0.001) and also between RAPID3 and CDAI (kappa value = 0.690, P < 0.001). Overall, 89-94 % of patients who met DAS28 or CDAI moderate/high activity criteria met similar RAPID severity criteria and 84-88 % who met DAS28 or CDAI remission/low activity criteria also met similar RAPID criteria. RAPID3 scores provide similar quantitative information to DAS28 and CDAI, and hence, is an informative index for evaluation of disease activity in RA in busy clinical settings.

Touchscreen questionnaire patient data collection in rheumatology practice: development of a highly successful system using process redesign

OBJECTIVE

While questionnaires have been developed to capture patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology practice, these instruments are not widely used. We developed a touchscreen interface designed to provide reliable and efficient data collection. Using the touchscreen to obtain PROs, we compared 2 different workflow models implemented separately in 2 rheumatology clinics.

METHODS

The Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology was used in 2 cycles of workflow redesign. Cycle 1 relied on off-the-shelf questionnaire builder software, and cycle 2 relied on a custom programmed software solution.

RESULTS

During cycle 1, clinic 1 (private practice model, resource replete, simple flow) demonstrated a high completion rate at the start, averaging between 74% and 92% for the first 12 weeks. Clinic 2 (academic model, resource deficient, complex flow) did not achieve a consistent completion rate above 60%. The revised cycle 2 implementation protocol incorporated a 15-minute "nurse visit," an instant messaging system, and a streamlined authentication process, all of which contributed to substantial improvement in touchscreen questionnaire completion rates of ∼80% that were sustained without the need for any additional clinic staff support.

CONCLUSION

Process redesign techniques and touchscreen technology were used to develop a highly successful, efficient, and effective process for the routine collection of PROs in a busy, complex, and resource-depleted academic practice and in typical private practice. The successful implementation required both a touchscreen questionnaire, human behavioral redesign, and other technical solutions.

Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in patients with low back pain

PURPOSE

To conduct a cross-cultural adaptation of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) into French according to established guidelines.

METHODS

Seventy outpatients with chronic low back pain were recruited from six spine centres in Switzerland and France. They completed the newly translated COMI, and the Roland Morris disability (RMQ), Dallas Pain (DPQ), adjectival pain rating scale, WHO Quality of Life, and EuroQoL-5D questionnaires. After ~14 days RMQ and COMI were completed again to assess reproducibility; a transition question (7-point Likert scale; "very much worse" through "no change" to "very much better") indicated any change in status since the first questionnaire.

RESULTS

COMI whole scores displayed no floor effects and just 1.5% ceiling effects. The scores for the individual COMI items correlated with their corresponding full-length reference questionnaire with varying strengths of correlation (0.33-0.84, P < 0.05). COMI whole scores showed a very good correlation with the "multidimensional" DPQ global score (Rho = 0.71). 55 patients (79%) returned a second questionnaire with no/minimal change in their back status. The reproducibility of individual COMI 5-point items was good, with test-retest differences within one grade ranging from 89% for 'social/work disability' to 98% for 'symptom-specific well-being'. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the COMI whole score was 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the French version of this short, multidimensional questionnaire showed good psychometric properties, comparable to those reported for German and Spanish versions. The French COMI represents a valuable tool for future multicentre clinical studies and surgical registries (e.g. SSE Spine Tango) in French-speaking countries.

Morning stiffness and other patient-reported outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice

Morning stiffness has been recognized in traditional approaches to assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although morning stiffness is not specific to RA, changes in morning stiffness for an individual patient are helpful when monitoring health status. Health professionals can ask about morning stiffness but the most accurate and consistent approach to assessment from one visit to the next appears to be a patient self-report questionnaire. However, quantitative measures of patient-reported data are not an integral part of clinical monitoring in most clinics. No single measure is adequate for all individual patients, so quantitative measurement of patient-reported data should include many elements such as pain, functional status, fatigue, sleep, morning stiffness, work capacity, and physical and emotional well-being. In daily clinical practice, patient-reported outcomes can be collected easily using a standard questionnaire that patients can complete with pencil and paper or electronically on a touch screen in the waiting room. The results are then immediately available to the rheumatologists, to facilitate doctor-patient communication to improve the quality of patient care, leading to better patient outcomes.

Measures of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity in Australian clinical practice

Objectives. To investigate which rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity measures are being collected in patients receiving glucocorticoids, non-biologic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in Australian rheumatology practice. Methods. A retrospective audit of medical records was conducted from eight rheumatology practices around Australia. Each rheumatologist recruited 30 consecutive eligible patients into the review, 10 of whom must have been receiving a biological agent for rheumatoid arthritis. Disease activity measures and radiographic assessments were collected from each patient's last consultation. For biologic patients, disease activity measures were also collected from when the patient was first initiated on the biological agent. Results. At last consultation, the disease measures that were recorded most often were ESR (89.2%), haemoglobin (87.5%), and CRP (84.2%). DAS28 was infrequently recorded (16.3%). The rate of recording disease activity measures for patients receiving biologic DMARDs decreased over time (mean 27 months). Conclusion. This review has shown inconsistency of RA activity measures being recorded in Australian rheumatology clinical practice. An accurate assessment of the disease process is necessary to effectively target rheumatoid arthritis patients to treat in order to achieve optimal outcomes.

Improving the routine management of rheumatoid arthritis: the value of tight control

Evidence is mounting that adopting a tight control approach to the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) yields superior clinical outcomes including inhibition of progressive structural damage. While this approach has been successfully implemented in other chronic diseases, such as diabetes, its use in RA is less straightforward as there is not a simple "gold standard" measure for disease activity. A key component of the tight control approach is the availability of easily implemented and clinically relevant assessment measures of disease activity that allow physicians to monitor progress toward preset goals. This article summarizes the evidence from clinical trials demonstrating the benefits of achieving tight control and surveys the instruments available to assess patient progress in a consistent manner. A case study clearly demonstrates the benefits of the tight control approach in routine clinical practice.

Patient questionnaires in rheumatoid arthritis: advantages and limitations as a quantitative, standardized scientific medical history

In many chronic diseases, objective gold standard measures such as blood pressure, cholesterol, and bone densitometry often provide most of the information used to establish a diagnosis and guide therapy. By contrast, in inflammatory rheumatic diseases, information from a patient history usually is considerably more prominent in clinical management. Patient history data can be recorded as standardized, quantitative scientific data through use of validated self-reported questionnaires. Patient questionnaires address the primary concerns of patients and their families. Questionnaire scores distinguish active from control treatments in clinical trials at similar levels to swollen and tender joint counts or laboratory tests. Patient questionnaire data are correlated significantly with joint counts, radiographic scores, and laboratory tests, but usually are far more significant than these measures in the prognosis of severe outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including work disability, costs, and premature death. Limitations of patient questionnaires are based on cultural features involving variation in responses among ethnic groups, and a need for translation, although translated questionnaires can be as valuable as a translator. Patient questionnaires do not replace further medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging data, and they require interpretation in a context of these standard sources of information at any clinical encounter. Patient questionnaires are useful to monitor patient status in usual clinical care, with almost no effort on the part of the physician and staff if distributed by the receptionist in the infrastructure of office practice.

Abatacept in biologic-naïve patients and TNF inadequate responders: clinical data in focus

BACKGROUND

Advances in the understanding of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) immunopathogenesis support the hypothesis for a 'window of opportunity' for therapeutic intervention in RA and the need for rapid and effective treatment strategies, with the ultimate goal of alleviating symptoms and halting progressive joint damage. Biologic therapies targeting pro-inflammatory cytokines have significantly improved the outlook for patients with RA; however, some patients still experience inadequate treatment responses. Recently, therapeutic agents targeting alternative pathways have been developed. One such therapy--abatacept--targets T-cell activation and is approved in the United States for treatment of moderate-to-severe RA and juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE

To overview the efficacy and safety of abatacept in the treatment of adult patients with active RA and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists. SEARCH METHODOLOGY: A comprehensive literature search was performed using the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE), EMBASE and BIOSIS databases (restricted to articles in the English language posted between January 2000 and February 2007). The search terms 'CTLA-4Ig', 'abatacept' and 'ORENCIA' were used, and data from randomized clinical trials were summarized.

RESULTS

Abatacept provided clinically meaningful improvements in the signs and symptoms of RA in both MTX and TNF antagonist inadequate responders in Phase II and III studies. Health-related quality of life was also improved with abatacept, which demonstrated an acceptable safety and tolerability profile in both patient populations. Additionally, when assessed in patients with an inadequate response to MTX, abatacept inhibited structural damage progression.

CONCLUSION

Although longer-term data are required and differing study designs preclude direct comparisons with other RA therapies, results of clinical trials to date suggest that abatacept has an acceptable safety profile and is an effective treatment option for patients with RA, whether treating biologic-naïve patients or those who have already had an inadequate response to TNF antagonists.