Tuning constitutive and pathological inflammation in the gut via the interaction of dietary nitrate and polyphenols with host microbiome

Do oral and gut microbiota communicate through redox pathways? A novel asset of the nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway

Nitrate may act as a regulator of •NO bioavailability via sequential reduction along the nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway with widespread health benefits, including a eubiotic effect on the oral and gut microbiota. Here, we discuss the molecular mechanisms of microbiota-host communication through redox pathways, via the production of •NO and oxidants by the family of NADPH oxidases, namely hydrogen peroxide (via Duox2), superoxide radical (via Nox1 and Nox2) and peroxynitrite, which leads to downstream activation of stress responses (Nrf2 and NFkB pathways) in the host mucosa. The activation of Nox2 by microbial metabolites is also discussed. Finally, we propose a new perspective in which both oral and gut microbiota communicate through redox pathways, with nitrate as the pivot linking both ecosystems.

Boosting nitric oxide in stress and respiratory infection: Potential relevance for asthma and COVID-19

Nitric oxide (NO) is a ubiquitous signaling molecule that is critical for supporting a plethora of processes in biological organisms. Among these, its role in the innate immune system as a first line of defense against pathogens has received less attention. In asthma, levels of exhaled NO have been utilized as a window into airway inflammation caused by allergic processes. However, respiratory infections count among the most important triggers of disease exacerbations. Among the multitude of factors that affect NO levels are psychological processes. In particular, longer lasting states of psychological stress and depression have been shown to attenuate NO production. The novel SARS-CoV-2 virus, which has caused a pandemic, and with that, sustained levels of psychological stress globally, also adversely affects NO signaling. We review evidence on the role of NO in respiratory infection, including COVID-19, and stress, and argue that boosting NO bioavailability may be beneficial in protection from infections, thus benefitting individuals who suffer from stress in asthma or SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Utilizing centralized biorepository samples for biomarkers of cystic fibrosis lung disease severity

BACKGROUND

Circulating biomarkers reflective of lung disease activity and severity have the potential to improve patient care and accelerate drug development in CF. The objective of this study was to leverage banked specimens to test the hypothesis that blood-based biomarkers discriminate CF children segregated by lung disease severity.

METHODS

Banked serum samples were selected from children who were categorized into two extremes of phenotype associated with lung function ('mild' or 'severe') based on CF-specific data and were matched on age, gender, CFTR genotype, and P. aeruginosa infection status. Targeted inflammatory proteins, lipids, and discovery metabolite profiles were measured in these serum samples.

RESULTS

The severe cohort, characterized by a lower CF-specific FEV1 percentile, had significantly higher circulating concentrations of high sensitivity C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A, granulocyte colony stimulating factor, and calprotectin compared to the mild cohort. The mild cohort tended to have higher serum linoleic acid concentrations. The metabolite arabitol was lower in the severe cohort while other CF relevant metabolic pathways showed non-significant differences after adjusting for multiple comparisons. A sensitivity analysis to correct for biased estimates that may result from selecting subjects using an extremes of phenotype approach confirmed the protein biomarker findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating inflammatory proteins differ in CF children segregated by lung function. These findings serve to demonstrate the value of maintaining centralized, high quality patient derived samples for future research, with linkage to clinical information to answer testable hypotheses in biomarker development.

Nitrate from diet might fuel gut microbiota metabolism: Minding the gap between redox signaling and inter-kingdom communication

The gut microbiota has been recently interpreted in terms of a metabolic organ that influences the host through reciprocal interactions, encompassing metabolic and immune pathways, genetic and epigenetic programming in host mammal tissues in a diet-depended manner, that shape virtually all aspects of host physiology. In this scenario, dietary nitrate, a major component of leafy green vegetables known for their health benefits, might fuel microbiota metabolism with ensued consequences for microbiota-host interaction. Cumulating evidence support that nitrate shapes oral microbiome communities with impact on the kinetics and systemic levels of both nitrate and nitrite. However, the impact of nitrate, which is steadily delivered into the lower gastrointestinal tract after a vegetable-rich meal, in the intestinal microbiome communities and their functional capacity remains largely elusive. Several mechanisms reinforce the notion that nitrate may be a nutrient for the lower microbiome and might participate in local redox interactions with relevance for bacteria-host interactions, among these nitric oxide-dependent mechanisms along the nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway. Also, by allowing bacteria to thrive, either by increasing microbial biomass or by acting as a respiratory substrate for the existing communities, nitrate ensures the production of bacterial metabolites (e.g., pathogen-associated molecular patterns, PAMP, short chain fatty acids, among other) that are recognised by host receptors (such as toll-like, TLR, and formyl peptide receptors, FPR) thereby activating local signalling pathways. Here, we elaborate on the notion that via modulation of intestinal microbiota metabolism, dietary nitrate impacts on host-microbiota metabolic and redox interactions, thereby contributing as an essential nutrient to optimal health.