Molecular characteristics supporting l-Type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1)-mediated translocation

The L-type amino acid transporter 1 enhances drug delivery to the mouse pancreatic beta cell line (MIN6)

l-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) is a membrane transporter responsible for carrying large, neutral l-configured amino acids as well as appropriate (pro)drugs into a cell. It has shown a great potential to improve drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier and to increase cell uptake into several brain and cancer cell types. However, besides the brain, the LAT1-utilizing compounds are also delivered more efficiently into the pancreas in vivo. In this study, we quantified the expression of LAT1 along several other membrane transporters in mouse pancreatic β-cell line (MIN6). Furthermore, we studied the function of LAT1 in MIN6 cells, and its ability to deliver non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-derived prodrugs there. The results showed that LAT1 was highly abundant in MIN6 cells, with an even expression on cell pseudoislets. The l-leucine uptake as a probe substrate was efficient, with comparable affinity and capacity to previously studied immortalized mouse microglia (BV2). The NSAID-derived prodrugs utilized LAT1 for their delivery and were uptaken into MIN6 cells 2-300 times more efficiently when compared to their parent drugs. A similar increase in pancreatic delivery was observed also in vivo, where the pancreatic exposure was 2-10 times higher with selected prodrugs, indicating an excellent correlation between in vitro uptake and in vivo pancreatic delivery. Finally, the LAT1-utilizing prodrugs were able to reverse the effects of cytokines on insulin secretion in MIN6 cells, showing that improved delivery via LAT1 can enhance drug effects in the mouse pancreatic β-cell line.

Specific transport of temozolomide does not override DNA repair-mediated chemoresistance

Temozolomide (TMZ) a DNA alkylating agent, is the standard-of-care for brain tumors, such as glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Although the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of TMZ, such as chemical stability and the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), have been questioned in the past, the acquired chemoresistance has been the main limiting factor of long-term clinical use of TMZ. In the present study, an L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1)-utilizing prodrug of TMZ (TMZ-AA, 6) was prepared and studied for its cellular accumulation and cytotoxic properties in human squamous cell carcinoma, UT-SCC-28 and UT-SCC-42B cells, and TMZ-sensitive human glioma, U-87MG cells that expressed functional LAT1. TMZ-AA 6 accumulated more effectively than TMZ itself into those cancer cells that expressed LAT1 (UT-SCC-42B). However, this did not correlate with decreased viability of treated cells. Indeed, TMZ-AA 6, similarly to TMZ itself, required adjuvant inhibitor(s) of DNA-repair systems, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyl transferase (MGMT) and base excision repair (BER), as well as active DNA mismatch repair (MMR), for maximal growth inhibition. The present study shows that improving the delivery of this widely-used methylating agent is not the main barrier to improved chemotherapy, although utilizing a specific transporter overexpressed at the BBB or glioma cells can have targeting advantages. To obtain a more effective anticancer prodrug, the compound design focus should shift to altering the major DNA alkylation site or inhibiting DNA repair systems.

Structural Features Affecting the Interactions and Transportability of LAT1-Targeted Phenylalanine Drug Conjugates

L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) transfers essential amino acids across cell membranes. Owing to its predominant expression in the blood-brain barrier and tumor cells, LAT1 has been exploited for drug delivery and targeting to the central nervous system (CNS) and various cancers. Although the interactions of amino acids and their mimicking compounds with LAT1 have been extensively investigated, the specific structural features for an optimal drug scaffold have not yet been determined. Here, we evaluated a series of LAT1-targeted drug-phenylalanine conjugates (ligands) by determining their uptake rates by in vitro studies and investigating their interaction with LAT1 via induced-fit docking. Combining the experimental and computational data, we concluded that although LAT1 can accommodate various types of structures, smaller compounds are preferred. As the ligand size increased, its flexibility became more crucial in determining the compound's transportability and interactions. Compounds with linear or planar structures exhibited reduced uptake; those with rigid lipophilic structures lacked interactions and likely utilized other transport mechanisms for cellular entry. Introducing polar groups between aromatic structures enhanced interactions. Interestingly, compounds with a carbamate bond in the aromatic ring's para-position displayed very good transport efficiencies for the larger compounds. Compared to the ester bond, the corresponding amide bond had superior hydrogen bond acceptor properties and increased interactions. A reverse amide bond was less favorable than a direct amide bond for interactions with LAT1. The present information can be applied broadly to design appropriate CNS or antineoplastic drug candidates with a prodrug strategy and to discover novel LAT1 inhibitors used either as direct or adjuvant cancer therapy.

A Historical Review of Brain Drug Delivery

The history of brain drug delivery is reviewed beginning with the first demonstration, in 1914, that a drug for syphilis, salvarsan, did not enter the brain, due to the presence of a blood-brain barrier (BBB). Owing to restricted transport across the BBB, FDA-approved drugs for the CNS have been generally limited to lipid-soluble small molecules. Drugs that do not cross the BBB can be re-engineered for transport on endogenous BBB carrier-mediated transport and receptor-mediated transport systems, which were identified during the 1970s-1980s. By the 1990s, a multitude of brain drug delivery technologies emerged, including trans-cranial delivery, CSF delivery, BBB disruption, lipid carriers, prodrugs, stem cells, exosomes, nanoparticles, gene therapy, and biologics. The advantages and limitations of each of these brain drug delivery technologies are critically reviewed.

Increased/Targeted Brain (Pro)Drug Delivery via Utilization of Solute Carriers (SLCs)

Membrane transporters have a crucial role in compounds’ brain drug delivery. They allow not only the penetration of a wide variety of different compounds to cross the endothelial cells of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), but also the accumulation of them into the brain parenchymal cells. Solute carriers (SLCs), with nearly 500 family members, are the largest group of membrane transporters. Unfortunately, not all SLCs are fully characterized and used in rational drug design. However, if the structural features for transporter interactions (binding and translocation) are known, a prodrug approach can be utilized to temporarily change the pharmacokinetics and brain delivery properties of almost any compound. In this review, main transporter subtypes that are participating in brain drug disposition or have been used to improve brain drug delivery across the BBB via the prodrug approach, are introduced. Moreover, the ability of selected transporters to be utilized in intrabrain drug delivery is discussed. Thus, this comprehensive review will give insights into the methods, such as computational drug design, that should be utilized more effectively to understand the detailed transport mechanisms. Moreover, factors, such as transporter expression modulation pathways in diseases that should be taken into account in rational (pro)drug development, are considered to achieve successful clinical applications in the future.

Targeting Transporters for Drug Delivery to the Brain: Can We Do Better?

Limited drug delivery to the brain is one of the major reasons for high failure rates of central nervous system (CNS) drug candidates. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) with its tight junctions, membrane transporters, receptors and metabolizing enzymes is a main player in drug delivery to the brain, restricting the entrance of the drugs and other xenobiotics. Current knowledge about the uptake transporters expressed at the BBB and brain parenchymal cells has been used for delivery of CNS drugs to the brain via targeting transporters. Although many transporter-utilizing (pro)drugs and nanocarriers have been developed to improve the uptake of drugs to the brain, their success rate of translation from preclinical development to humans is negligible. In the present review, we provide a systematic summary of the current progress in development of transporter-utilizing (pro)drugs and nanocarriers for delivery of drugs to the brain. In addition, we applied CNS pharmacokinetic concepts for evaluation of the limitations and gaps in investigation of the developed transporter-utilizing (pro)drugs and nanocarriers. Finally, we give recommendations for a rational development of transporter-utilizing drug delivery systems targeting the brain based on CNS pharmacokinetic principles.

Pharmacoproteomics of Brain Barrier Transporters and Substrate Design for the Brain Targeted Drug Delivery

One of the major reasons why central nervous system (CNS)-drug development has been challenging in the past, is the barriers that prevent substances entering from the blood circulation into the brain. These barriers include the blood-brain barrier (BBB), blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB), blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB), and blood-arachnoid barrier (BAB), and they differ from each other in their transporter protein expression and function as well as among the species. The quantitative expression profiles of the transporters in the CNS-barriers have been recently revealed, and in this review, it is described how they affect the pharmacokinetics of compounds and how these expression differences can be taken into account in the prediction of brain drug disposition in humans, an approach called pharmacoproteomics. In recent years, also structural biology and computational resources have progressed remarkably, enabling a detailed understanding of the dynamic processes of transporters. Molecular dynamics simulations (MDS) are currently used commonly to reveal the conformational changes of the transporters and to find the interactions between the substrates and the protein during the binding, translocation in the transporter cavity, and release of the substrate on the other side of the membrane. The computational advancements have also aided in the rational design of transporter-utilizing compounds, including prodrugs that can be actively transported without losing potency towards the pharmacological target. In this review, the state-of-art of these approaches will be also discussed to give insights into the transporter-mediated drug delivery to the CNS.

Comparison of Experimental Strategies to Study l-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1 (LAT1) Utilization by Ligands

l-Type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1), expressed abundantly in the brain and placenta and overexpressed in several cancer cell types, has gained a lot of interest in drug research and development, as it can be utilized for brain-targeted drug delivery, as well as inhibiting the essential amino acid supply to cancer cells. The structure of LAT1 is today very well-known and the interactions of ligands at the binding site of LAT1 can be modeled and explained. However, less is known of LAT1′s life cycle within the cells. Moreover, the functionality of LAT1 can be measured by several different methods, which may vary between the laboratories and make the comparison of the results challenging. In the present study, the usefulness of indirect cis-inhibition methods and direct cellular uptake methods and their variations to interpret the interactions of LAT1-ligands were evaluated. Moreover, this study also highlights the importance of understanding the intracellular kinetics of LAT1-ligands, and how they can affect the regular function of LAT1 in critical tissues, such as the brain. Hence, it is discussed herein how the selected methodology influences the outcome and created knowledge of LAT1-utilizing compounds.