Comparison of the effects between lasers applied to myofascial trigger points and to classical acupoints for patients with cervical myofascial pain syndrome

The effect of therapeutic physical modalities on pain, function, and quality of life in patients with myofascial pain syndrome: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction, which is characterised by myofascial trigger points. Therapeutic physical modalities, as potentially effective treatment options, are commonly used in the clinical setting for the patients with MPS.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of therapeutic physical modalities in the treatment of MPS, investigate its therapeutic mechanisms and provide a scientific evidence-based decision.

METHODS

According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, the PubMed, Cochrane Central Library, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched for randomized controlled clinical studies published from database inception to October 30, 2022. A total of 25 articles met the study inclusion criteria. Data were extracted from these studies and a qualitative analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, laser therapy, and other therapeutic physical modalities have been demonstrated to improve the pain symptoms, joint mobility, psychological state, and quality of life in the patients with MPS and no side effects have been reported. The curative effect of therapeutic physical modalities was found to be possibly associated with increased blood perfusion and oxygen supply in ischaemic tissues, reduced hyperalgesia in the peripheral and central nerves, and decreased involuntary muscle contractions.

CONCLUSION

The systematic review has shown that therapeutic physical modalities could provide a safe and effective therapeutic option for MPS. However, the consensus is currently lacking regarding the optimal treatment paradigm, therapeutic parameters, and mutual combination of therapeutic physical modalities. The clinical trials with robust quality are required to further promote the evidence-based application of therapeutic physical modalities for MPS.

Creation of myofascial pain syndrome-like muscle by artificial electrical stimulation and stretching treatment

BACKGROUND

Myofascial pain syndrome（MPS）is a common chronic pain disorder characterized by muscle hardness, low extensibility, restriction of range of motion (ROM)　and pain with trigger point (TP). Eccentric contraction has been used in past animal studies of MPS. However, clinical experience suggests that concentric contraction is also involved in MPS formation.

NEW METHODS

In this study, we adopted artificial electrical stimulation to create artificial concentric contraction (ACC) in rat gastrocnemius muscle. After ACC, muscle hardness, torsion and range of motion (ROM) were compared between before ACC, after ACC, and stretching group. To clarify the association with pain, the expression of pERK in DRG were analyzed.

COMPARISON TO EXISTING METHODS

Previous animal studies have created MPS models by inducing eccentric contractions in muscles. In this study, full tetanus contraction of the gastrocnemius muscle was achieved via tibial nerve stimulation. This method substituted muscle contraction due to abnormal excitation.

RESULTS

We found that artificial abnormal contraction (ACC) induced muscle hardness and ROM restriction. The pERK expression in DRG was increased by ACC. Analysis of muscle tissue sections revealed a meandeling structure in muscle fibers. The stretching treatment improved these indicators. These results were similar to feature of the MPS muscles.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACC caused by artificial electrical stimulation leads to the characteristic of MPS in rat gastrocnemius muscle. This ACC model can be one of the useful options for MPS analysis.

Comparative effectiveness research on proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw in patients with trochanteric fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Background

The treatments for trochanteric fractures try to regain early mobility and limit morbidity and risk of reoperations. The most currently used dynamic hip screw (DHS) and the proximal femoral nail (PFN) are both with pros and cons. We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of these interventions for trochanteric fractures by evaluating the surgical performance and postoperative outcomes.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register were searched for RCTs comparing DHS and PFN for trochanteric fractures. All selected studies and the risk of bias were assessed. Clinical data including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, successful closed reduction and complications like nonunion, implant failure and reoperation were recorded. Random-effects models were used in Review Manager software, and GRADE was applied for the interpretation of the evidence.

Results

From 286 identified trials, twelve RCTs including 1889 patients were eligible for inclusion; six RCTs directly comparing DHS with PFN, while other six compared DHS with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). Compared to DHS, PFN had shorter operative time and led to less intraoperative blood loss. However, DHS need less intraoperative fluoroscopy time than PFN. No difference was seen for the achievement of closed reduction. For risk of postoperative complications, no difference was seen between PFN and DHS for non-union, risk of implant failure and revision surgery.

Conclusions

PFN(A) resulted in a shorter operative time and less intraoperative blood loss compared to DHS. However, no difference was seen for postoperative complications.

Trial registration PROSPERO: CRD42021239974.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03189-z.

After me, the deluge: The intricacies of pulmonary surfactant

This issue of the Biomedical Journal provides a comprehensive insight into the role of pulmonary surfactant and influencing its components as well as involved molecules to treat a variety of respiratory distress disorders. We also discover how epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) could be targeted as part of a therapeutic strategy against lung cancer. Furthermore, a method is described to eliminate chemoresistance against gemcitabine, a drug administered to treat pancreatic cancer. We gain an insight into the composition of salivary calcium particles in periodontitis, a technique to circumvent complications in hip surgery, and a potential treatment to accelerate diabetic wound healing. Moreover, we get to know an essential oil that exerts a similar effect as diazepam on the central nervous system. A trial in patients with myofascial pain syndrome demonstrates how laser assisted trigger point therapy leads to immediate relief. Finally, a case study outlines the discovery of a genetic mutation that plays a role in intellectual disability.