Evaluation of lung and chest wall mechanics during anaesthesia using the PEEP-step method

Gas distribution by EIT during PEEP inflation: PEEP response and optimal PEEP with lowest trans-pulmonary driving pressure can be determined without esophageal pressure during a rapid PEEP trial in patients with acute respiratory failure

Objective. Protective ventilation should be based onlungmechanics and transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔPTP), as this 'hits' the lung directly.Approach. The change in end-expiratory lung volume (ΔEELV) is determined by the size of the PEEP step and the elastic properties of the lung (EL), ΔEELV/ΔPEEP. Consequently, EL can be determined as ΔPEEP/ΔEELV. By calibration of tidal inspiratory impedance change with ventilator inspiratory tidal volume, end-expiratory lung impedance changes were converted to volume changes and lung P/V curves were obtained during a PEEP trial in ten patients with acute respiratory failure. The PEEP level where ΔPTP was lowest (optimal PEEP) was determined as the steepest point of the lung P/V curve.Main results. Over-all EL ranged between 7.0-23.2 cmH₂O/L. Optimal PEEP was 12.9 cmH₂O (10-16) with ΔPTP of 4.1 cmH₂O (2.8-7.6). Patients with highest EL were PEEP non-responders, where EL increased in non-dependent and dependent lung at high PEEP, indicating over-distension in all lung. Patients with lower EL were PEEP responders with decreasing EL in dependent lung when increasing PEEP.Significance. PEEP non-responders could be identified by regional lung P/V curves derived from ventilator calibrated EIT. Optimal PEEP could be determined from the equation for the lung P/V curve.

A structured narrative review of clinical and experimental studies of the use of different positive end-expiratory pressure levels during thoracic surgery

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to present a review on the general effects of different positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels during thoracic surgery by qualitatively categorizing the effects into detrimental, beneficial, and inconclusive.

DATA SOURCE

Literature search of Pubmed, CNKI, and Wanfang was made to find relative articles about PEEP levels during thoracic surgery. We used the following keywords as one-lung ventilation, PEEP, and thoracic surgery.

RESULTS

We divide the non-individualized PEEP value into five grades, that is, less than 5, 5, 5-10, 10, and more than 10 cmH₂ O, among which 5 cmH₂ O is the most commonly used in clinic at present to maintain alveolar dilatation and reduce the shunt fraction and the occurrence of atelectasis, whereas individualized PEEP, adjusted by test titration or imaging method to adapt to patients' personal characteristics, can effectively ameliorate intraoperative oxygenation and obtain optimal pulmonary compliance and better indexes relating to respiratory mechanics.

CONCLUSIONS

Available data suggest that PEEP might play an important role in one-lung ventilation, the understanding of which will help in exploring a simple and economical method to set the appropriate PEEP level.

Association between intraoperative tidal volume and postoperative respiratory complications is dependent on respiratory elastance: a retrospective, multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

The impact of high vs low intraoperative tidal volumes on postoperative respiratory complications remains unclear. We hypothesised that the effect of intraoperative tidal volume on postoperative respiratory complications is dependent on respiratory system elastance.

METHODS

We retrospectively recorded tidal volume (Vt; ml kg^-1 ideal body weight [IBW]) in patients undergoing elective, non-cardiothoracic surgery from hospital registry data. The primary outcome was respiratory failure (requiring reintubation within 7 days of surgery, desaturation after extubation, or both). The primary exposure was defined as the interaction between Vt and standardised respiratory system elastance (driving pressure divided by Vt; cm H₂O/[ml kg^-1]). Multivariable logistic regression models, with and without interaction terms (which categorised Vt as low [Vt ≤8 ml kg^-1] or high [Vt >8 ml kg^-1]), were adjusted for potential confounders. Additional analyses included path mediation analysis and fractional polynomial modelling.

RESULTS

Overall, 10 821/197 474 (5.5%) patients sustained postoperative respiratory complications. Higher Vt was associated with greater risk of postoperative respiratory complications (adjusted odds ratio=1.42 per ml kg^-1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.50]; P<0.001). This association was modified by respiratory system elastance (P<0.001); in patients with low compliance (<42.4 ml cm H₂O^-1), higher Vt was associated with greater risk of postoperative respiratory complications (adjusted risk difference=0.3% [95% CI, 0.0-0.5] at 41.2 ml cm H₂O^-1 compliance, compared with 5.8% [95% CI, 3.8-7.8] at 14 ml cm H₂O^-1 compliance). This association was absent when compliance exceeded 41.2 ml cm H₂O^-1. Adverse effects associated with high Vt were entirely mediated by driving pressures (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The association of harm with higher tidal volumes during intraoperative mechanical ventilation is modified by respiratory system elastance. These data suggest that respiratory elastance should inform the design of perioperative trials testing intraoperative ventilatory strategies.

Myths and Misconceptions of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation: Getting Past the Noise and on to the Signal

In the pursuit of science, competitive ideas and debate are necessary means to attain knowledge and expose our ignorance. To quote Murray Gell-Mann (1969 Nobel Prize laureate in Physics): “Scientific orthodoxy kills truth”. In mechanical ventilation, the goal is to provide the best approach to support patients with respiratory failure until the underlying disease resolves, while minimizing iatrogenic damage. This compromise characterizes the philosophy behind the concept of “lung protective” ventilation. Unfortunately, inadequacies of the current conceptual model–that focuses exclusively on a nominal value of low tidal volume and promotes shrinking of the “baby lung” - is reflected in the high mortality rate of patients with moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. These data call for exploration and investigation of competitive models evaluated thoroughly through a scientific process. Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV) is one of the most studied yet controversial modes of mechanical ventilation that shows promise in experimental and clinical data. Over the last 3 decades APRV has evolved from a rescue strategy to a preemptive lung injury prevention approach with potential to stabilize the lung and restore alveolar homogeneity. However, several obstacles have so far impeded the evaluation of APRV’s clinical efficacy in large, randomized trials. For instance, there is no universally accepted standardized method of setting APRV and thus, it is not established whether its effects on clinical outcomes are due to the ventilator mode per se or the method applied. In addition, one distinctive issue that hinders proper scientific evaluation of APRV is the ubiquitous presence of myths and misconceptions repeatedly presented in the literature. In this review we discuss some of these misleading notions and present data to advance scientific discourse around the uses and misuses of APRV in the current literature.

Evaluation of Lung Aeration and Respiratory System Mechanics in Obese Dogs Ventilated With Tidal Volumes Based on Ideal vs. Current Body Weight

We describe the respiratory mechanics and lung aeration in anesthetized obese dogs ventilated with tidal volumes (VT) based on ideal (VTi) vs. current (VTc) body weight. Six dogs with body condition scores ≥ 8/9 were included. End-expiratory respiratory mechanics and end-expiratory CT-scan were obtained at baseline for each dog. Thereafter, dogs were ventilated with VT 15 ml kg⁻¹ based on VTi and VTc, applied randomly. Respiratory mechanics and CT-scan were repeated at end-inspiration during VTi and VTc. Data analyzed with linear mixed models and reported as mean ± SD or median [range]. Statistical significance p < 0.05. The elastance of the lung, chest wall and respiratory system indexed by ideal body weight (IBW) were positively correlated with body fat percentage, whereas the functional residual capacity indexed by IBW was negatively correlated with body fat percentage. At end-expiration, aeration (%) was: hyperaeration 0.03 [0.00–3.35], normoaeration 69.7 [44.6–82.2], hypoaeration 29.3 [13.6–49.4] and nonaeration (1.06% [0.37–6.02]). Next to the diaphragm, normoaeration dropped to 12 ± 11% and hypoaeration increased to 90 ± 8%. No differences in aeration between groups were found at end-inspiration. Airway driving pressure (cm H₂O) was higher (p = 0.002) during VTc (9.8 ± 0.7) compared with VTi (7.6 ± 0.4). Lung strain was higher (p = 0.014) during VTc (55 ± 21%) than VTi (38 ± 10%). The stress index was higher (p = 0.012) during VTc (SI = 1.07 [0.14]) compared with VTi (SI = 0.93 [0.18]). This study indicates that body fat percentage influences the magnitude of lung, chest wall, and total respiratory system elastance and resistance, as well as functional residual capacity. Further, these results indicate that obese dogs have extensive areas of hypoaerated lungs, especially in caudodorsal regions. Finally, lung strain and airway driving pressure, surrogates of lung deformation, are higher during VTc than during VTi, suggesting that in obese anesthetized dogs, ventilation protocols based on IBW may be advantageous.

Determining optimal positive end-expiratory pressure and tidal volume in children by intratidal compliance: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist regarding optimal intraoperative ventilation strategies for the paediatric population. This study aimed to determine the optimal combination of PEEP and tidal volume (V_T) based on intratidal compliance profiles in healthy young children undergoing general anaesthesia.

METHODS

During anaesthesia, infants (1 month-1 yr), toddlers (1-3 yr), and children (3-6 yr) were assigned serially to four ventilator settings: PEEP 8 cm H₂O/V_T 8 ml kg^-1 (PEEP8/V_T8), PEEP 10 cm H₂O/V_T 5 ml kg^-1 (PEEP10/V_T5), PEEP 10 cm H₂O/V_T 8 ml kg^-1 (PEEP10/V_T8), and PEEP 12 cm H₂O/V_T 5 ml kg^-1 (PEEP12/V_T5). The primary outcome was intratidal compliance profile, classified at each ventilator setting as horizontal (indicative of optimal alveolar ventilatory conditions), increasing, decreasing, or combinations of increasing/decreasing/horizontal compliance. Secondary outcomes were peak inspiratory, plateau, and driving pressures.

RESULTS

Intratidal compliance was measured in 15 infants, 13 toddlers, and 15 children (15/43 [35%] females). A horizontal compliance profile was most frequently observed with PEEP10/V_T5 (60.5%), compared with PEEP10/V_T8, PEEP8/V_T8, and PEEP12/V_T5 (23.3-34.9%; P<0.001). Decreasing compliance profiles were most frequent when V_T increased to 8 ml kg^-1, PEEP increased to 12 cm H₂O, or both. Plateau airway pressures were lower at PEEP8/V_T8 (16.9 cm H₂O [2.2]) and PEEP10/V_T5 (16.7 cm H₂O [1.7]), compared with PEEP10/V_T8 (19.5 cm H₂O [2.1]) and PEEP12/V_T5 (19.0 cm H₂O [2.0]; P<0.001). Driving pressure was lowest with PEEP10/V_T5 (4.6 cm H₂O), compared with other combinations (7.0 cm H₂O [2.0]-9.5 cm H₂O [2.1]; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

V_T 5 ml kg^-1 combined with 10 cm H₂O PEEP may reduce atelectasis and overdistension, and minimise driving pressure in the majority of mechanically ventilated children <6 yr. The effect of these PEEP and V_T settings on postoperative pulmonary complications in children undergoing surgery requires further study.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04633720.

Definition and clinical evaluation of a recruiting airway pressure based on the specific lung elastance in anesthetized dogs

OBJECTIVE

To determine the specific lung elastance (SE_L) in anesthetized dogs and to evaluate the efficacy of a SE_L-based recruiting airway pressure (RP_aw) at improving global and regional lung aeration.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective and prospective clinical study.

ANIMALS

A total of 28 adult dogs were included in the retrospective study and six adult dogs in the prospective study.

METHODS

Retrospective study: SE_L and SE_L-based RP_aw were determined using previously published data. In mechanically ventilated dogs undergoing thoracic computed tomography (CT), SE_L was calculated as ΔP_L/(V_T/EELV), where ΔP_L is the driving transpulmonary pressure, V_T is the tidal volume and EELV is the end-expiratory lung volume. The ratio of lung to respiratory system elastance (E_L/E_rs) was determined. SE_L and E_L/E_rs were used to calculate the SE_L-based RP_aw. Prospective study: dogs underwent thoracic CT at end-expiration and at end-inspiration using the SE_L-based RP_aw, and global and regional aeration was determined. For analysis of regional aeration, lungs were divided into cranial, intermediate and caudal regions. Regional compliance was also calculated. A p value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The SE_L and E_L/E_rs were 12.7 ± 3.1 cmH₂O and 0.54 ± 0.07, respectively. The SE_L-based RP_aw was 29.1 ± 7.6 cmH₂O. In the prospective study, the RP_aw was 28.2 ± 1.3 cmH₂O. During RP_aw, hyperinflation increased (p = 0.0003) whereas poorly aerated (p < 0.0001) and nonaerated (p = 0.01) tissue decreased. Normally aerated tissue did not change (p = 0.265). Regional compliance was higher in the intermediate (p = 0.0003) and caudal (p = 0.034) regions compared with the cranial region. Aeration did not differ between regions (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

An SE_L-based RP_aw reduces poorly and nonaerated lung tissue in anesthetized dogs. In nonsurgical anesthetized dogs, an RP_aw near 30 cmH₂O is effective at improving lung aeration.

Transpulmonary driving pressure during mechanical ventilation-validation of a non-invasive measurement method

BACKGROUND

Transpulmonary driving pressure plays an important role in today's understanding of ventilator induced lung injury. We have previously validated a novel non-invasive method based on stepwise increments of PEEP to assess transpulmonary driving pressure in anaesthetised patients with healthy lungs. The aim of this study was to validate the method in patients who were mechanically ventilated for different diagnoses requiring intensive care.

METHODS

We measured transpulmonary pressure (Ptp) and calculated transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔPtp) in 31 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit. Parallel triplicate measurements were performed with the PEEP step method (PtpPSM) and the conventional oesophageal balloon method (Ptpconv). Their agreement was compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland Altman plot.

RESULT

The coefficient of variation for the repeated measurements was 4,3 for ΔPtpPSM and 9,2 for ΔPtpconv. The ICC of 0,864 and the Bland Altman plot indicate good agreement between the two methods.

CONCLUSION

The non-invasive method can be applied in mechanically ventilated patients to measure transpulmonary driving pressure with good repeatability and accuracy comparable to the traditional oesophageal balloon method.

Driving Pressure and Transpulmonary Pressure: How Do We Guide Safe Mechanical Ventilation?

The physiological concept, pathophysiological implications and clinical relevance and application of driving pressure and transpulmonary pressure to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury are discussed.

Can we estimate transpulmonary pressure without an esophageal balloon?-yes

A protective ventilation strategy is based on separation of lung and chest wall mechanics and determination of transpulmonary pressure. So far, this has required esophageal pressure measurement, which is cumbersome, rarely used clinically and associated with lack of consensus on the interpretation of measurements. We have developed an alternative method based on a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) step procedure where the PEEP-induced change in end-expiratory lung volume is determined by the ventilator pneumotachograph. In pigs, lung healthy patients and acute lung injury (ALI) patients, it has been verified that the determinants of the change in end-expiratory lung volume following a PEEP change are the size of the PEEP step and the elastic properties of the lung, ∆PEEP × Clung. As a consequence, lung compliance can be calculated as the change in end-expiratory lung volume divided by the change in PEEP and esophageal pressure measurements are not needed. When lung compliance is determined in this way, transpulmonary driving pressure can be calculated on a breath-by-breath basis. As the end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure increases as much as PEEP is increased, it is also possible to determine the end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure at any PEEP level. Thus, the most crucial factors of ventilator induced lung injury can be determined by a simple PEEP step procedure. The measurement procedure can be repeated with short intervals, which makes it possible to follow the course of the lung disease closely. By the PEEP step procedure we may also obtain information (decision support) on the mechanical consequences of changes in PEEP and tidal volume performed to improve oxygenation and/or carbon dioxide removal.

Lung volumes, respiratory mechanics and dynamic strain during general anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

Driving pressure (ΔP) represents tidal volume normalised to respiratory system compliance (C_RS) and is a novel parameter to target ventilator settings. We conducted a study to determine whether C_RS and ΔP reflect aerated lung volume and dynamic strain during general anaesthesia.

METHODS

Twenty non-obese patients undergoing open abdominal surgery received three PEEP levels (2, 7, or 12 cm H₂O) in random order with constant tidal volume ventilation. Respiratory mechanics, lung volumes, and alveolar recruitment were measured to assess end-expiratory aerated volume, which was compared with the patient's individual predicted functional residual capacity in supine position (FRCp).

RESULTS

C_RS was linearly related to aerated volume and ΔP to dynamic strain at PEEP of 2 cm H₂O (intraoperative FRC) (r=0.72 and r=0.73, both P<0.001). These relationships were maintained with higher PEEP only when aerated volume did not overcome FRCp (r=0.73, P<0.001; r=0.54, P=0.004), with 100 ml lung volume increases accompanied by 1.8 ml cm H₂O^-1 (95% confidence interval [1.1-2.5]) increases in C_RS. When aerated volume was greater or equal to FRCp (35% of patients at PEEP 2 cm H₂O, 55% at PEEP 7 cm H₂O, and 75% at PEEP 12 cm H₂O), C_RS and ΔP were independent from aerated volume and dynamic strain, with C_RS weakly but significantly inversely related to alveolar dead space fraction (r=-0.47, P=0.001). PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment yielded higher C_RS and reduced ΔP only at aerated volumes below FRCp (P=0.015 and 0.008, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

During general anaesthesia, respiratory system compliance and driving pressure reflect aerated lung volume and dynamic strain, respectively, only if aerated volume does not exceed functional residual capacity in supine position, which is a frequent event when PEEP is used in this setting.