1
|
Wu X, Chen Y, Luo T, Liu Y, Zeng L. The Study of Remazolam Combined With Propofol on Painless Gastroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Perianesth Nurs 2024:S1089-9472(24)00130-8. [PMID: 39101863 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gastroscopy is one of the most commonly used diagnostic modalities for upper gastrointestinal disorders. Remazolam besylate, a new type of ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine drug, has been less studied in gastroscopy. In this study, we studied the efficacy and safety of remazolam combined with propofol for painless gastroscopy. DESIGN This was a single-center, placebo-controlled randomized trial. METHODS One hundred patients undergoing painless gastroscopy were included in this study and randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 50 per group): the control group (Con group) and the remazolam group (Rem group). Sufentanil, remazolam, and propofol were used to anesthetize the patients, and then, the effects of different solutions on these patients were compared and analyzed. The patient's general condition, vital signs at different times, the dosage of propofol (mg) and additional times, complications, duration of gastroscopy (minutes), recovery time (minutes), length of stay in the recovery room (minutes), and adverse reactions were recorded. FINDINGS Rem group systolic blood pressure was more stable (P < .05). The amount of additional propofol in Rem group was less (P < .05). The incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, and dizziness was lower in Rem group, as well as the time of awakening and stay in the recovery room were shorter (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Remazolam combined with sufentanil and propofol has less effect on hemodynamics in painless gastroscopy, and the patients have shorter awakening times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaohong Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, China National Nuclear Corporation 416 Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Yali Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shifang People's Hospital, Shifang, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Tuo Luo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shifang People's Hospital, Shifang, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yusong Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shifang People's Hospital, Shifang, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Lin Zeng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shifang People's Hospital, Shifang, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zheng L, Ye M, Ma J, Jin C, Yang Y, Li H, Zheng R, Wang Y. Effects of adding adjuvants to propofol on the post-anesthesia cognitive function in patients undergoing gastroscopy/colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2024; 23:995-1005. [PMID: 38217432 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2305705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to elucidate the effects of propofol plus adjuvants on postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and patient satisfaction. METHODS Studies published up to September 2023 on the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, Sinomed, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Clinictrials.gov websites were searched. Binary summary of results was used for meta-analyses. RESULTS We included 18 studies (2691 patients). The combined sedation did not affect the processing speed (ES = 0.02, 95%CI: -0.01, 0.04; I2 = 79.3%, p < 0.001), attention (ES = 0.02, 95%CI: -0.02, 0.05; I2 = 95.0%, p < 0.001), nor working memory (ES = 0.02, 95%CI: -0.03, 0.06; I2 = 94.4%, p < 0.001) in CogState brief battery tool. A significant effect of combined sedation was observed in the domain of visual learning in CogState tool (ES = -0.03, 95%CI: -0.04, -0.02; I2 = 15.8%, p = 0.306). The TDT (ES = 4.96, 95%CI: 2.92, 7.00) indicates that combined sedation would increase error rates in the tests of cognitive function. The DSST (ES = 0.16, 95% CI: -0.44, 0.75) shown that combined sedation does not affect cognitive function. In addition, an insignificant difference in patient satisfaction between combined sedation and propofol alone was observed (ES = -0.03, 95%CI: -0.09, 0.02). CONCLUSION The available evidence suggests that propofol combined with adjuvants may affect POCD but not patient satisfaction. REGISTRATION NUMBER INPLASY2023110092.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liupu Zheng
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Mengqian Ye
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jun Ma
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Chen Jin
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yan Yang
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Haoqi Li
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Rongyuan Zheng
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yi Wang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu Y, Deng J, Tong K, Yin Y, Yu R, Tan C. Efficacy and safety of esketamine for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1379101. [PMID: 38725661 PMCID: PMC11079169 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1379101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The role of esketamine in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy is still unclear. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esketamine for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods Clinical trials of esketamine for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy were searched in eight common databases, up to October 2023. These clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). The risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were used as the effect sizes for dichotomous variables and continuity variables, respectively. When the heterogeneity test showed I2 < 50%, the fixed effects model was used for the meta-analysis and TSA; Otherwise, the random effects model was used for them. Results In terms of efficacy endpoints, the meta-analysis showed that compared with placebo or blank, esketamine significantly decreased recovery time by 2.34 min (WMD -2.34; 95% Confidence interval [CI] -3.65, -1.02; p = 0.0005) and propofol consumption by 0.70 mg/kg (WMD -0.70; 95% CI -0.98, -0.43; p < 0.00001), and increased mean heart rate by 4.77 beats/min (WMD 4.77; 95% CI 2.67, 6.87; p < 0.00001) and mean arterial pressure by 3.10 mmHg (WMD 3.10; 95% CI 1.52, 4.67; p = 0.0001), while induction time and mean blood oxygen remained comparable. TSA indicated conclusive evidence for these benefits. In terms of safety endpoints, the meta-analysis revealed that esketamine significantly reduced involuntary movements by 59% (RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.22, 0.76; p = 0.005) and choking by 51% (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26, 0.92; p = 0.03), while significantly increasing dizziness by 98% (RR 1.98; 95% CI 1.11, 3.56; p = 0.02) and there were no significant differences in total adverse events, respiratory depression, and vomiting. TSA demonstrated conclusive evidence for involuntary movements and dizziness. Low-dose analysis showed that esketamine at ≤0.3 mg/kg significantly reduced recovery time, propofol consumption and involuntary movements, and significantly increasing mean heart rate, with no increase in dizziness. The Begg's test (p = 0.327) and the Egger's test (p = 0.413) indicated no significant publication bias, yet the funnel plot suggested potential publication bias. Conclusion Esketamine is an effective adjuvant anesthesia for children undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. However, the general dose of esketamine may increase the risk of dizziness, which can be avoided by administering a low dose (≤0.3 mg/kg).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunfeng Yu
- The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Huanan, China
| | - Juan Deng
- The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Huanan, China
- The Third Hospital of Changsha, Changsha, Huanan, China
| | - Keke Tong
- College of Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yuman Yin
- College of Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Rong Yu
- The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Huanan, China
| | - Chuanchuan Tan
- The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Huanan, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tang L, Lv W, Sun J, Chen L. Effect of intravenous lidocaine on the ED50 of propofol induction dose in elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study. Perioper Med (Lond) 2024; 13:15. [PMID: 38444044 PMCID: PMC10916234 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-024-00370-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intravenous lidocaine could be a potential alternative adjuvant to propofol-based sedation for gastroscopy in elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intravenous lidocaine on the median effective dose (ED50) of propofol induction dose in elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy. METHODS The study included 70 patients aged ≥ 60 years undergoing painless gastroscopy with 64 randomly assigned to either group L (2% lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg, n = 31) or group N (equal volume normal saline, n = 33). All patients received propofol induction following 0.1 μg/kg intravenous sufentanil. The Dixon "up-and-down" sequential method was used, with a 1.5 mg/kg initial induction dose of propofol followed by a 0.1 mg/kg sequential variable dose. The primary endpoint was the ED50 of the propofol induction dose. The total propofol dose, recovery time, adverse events, and local anesthetic intoxication reactions were also recorded. RESULTS The ED50 of propofol induction dose was 0.670 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.216-0.827) mg/kg in group L and 1.118 (95% CI 0.803-1.232) mg/kg in group N. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.001). The incidence of hypotension and propofol injection pain were lower in group L than in group N (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the orientation recovery time in group L was shorter compared to group N (p < 0.05). None of the participants in group L observed local anesthetic intoxication reactions after receiving lidocaine. CONCLUSIONS The administration of intravenous lidocaine to elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy resulted in a significant 40% reduction in the ED50 of propofol induction dose, which may be related to the decreased incidence of hypotension and injection pain, as well as the improved post-gastroscopy orientation recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION ChiCTR, ChiCTR2200065530. Registered on 08 November 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lili Tang
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Wenhui Lv
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Jingjing Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Lijian Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu F, Zhan L, Xu W, Bian J. Effect of intravenous lidocaine on outcomes in patients receiving propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2024; 80:39-52. [PMID: 37962581 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-023-03589-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures (GEPs) are frequently employed for the diagnosis and treatment of various gastrointestinal ailments. While propofol sedation is widely used during these procedures, there is a concern regarding its potential negative effects. Intravenous (IV) lidocaine has been suggested as an add-on to propofol sedation for GEPs, but current evidence on its efficiency and safety is limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of IV lidocaine on outcomes in patients receiving propofol during GEPs. METHODS Electronic databases were screened for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published up to 31 March 2023, investigating the effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine addition to propofol sedation during GEPs. RESULTS A total of 12 RCTs involving 712 patients that received IV lidocaine and propofol for GEF and 719 patients that received propofol were analyzed. Adding IV lidocaine to propofol sedation led to significant reduction in pain after the procedure (standardized mean difference (SMD) = - 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]; - 1.51 to - 0.32), decreased propofol usage (SMD = - 0.89; 95% CI, - 1.31 to - 0.48), lower recovery time (SMD = - 0.95 min; 95% CI, - 1.48 to - 0.43), and decreased pain score (SMD = - 0.91; 95% CI, - 1.51 to - 0.32). The overall rate of adverse events was markedly less in the lidocaine group than in the control group (RR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.99). CONCLUSION Our results show that IV lidocaine improves patient outcomes by reducing post-procedural pain, decreasing propofol usage, shortening recovery time, and lowering pain scores. This study provides compelling evidence supporting the use of intravenous lidocaine as an adjunct to propofol sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. However, further research is necessary to optimize the use of lidocaine and fully understand its long-term effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangpu Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China
| | - Linsen Zhan
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, No.100, Minjiang Avenue, Kecheng District, Quzhou, China
| | - Jun Bian
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, No.100, Minjiang Avenue, Kecheng District, Quzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Silva A, Mourão J, Vale N. A Review of the Lidocaine in the Perioperative Period. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1699. [PMID: 38138926 PMCID: PMC10744742 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13121699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
This review analyzes the controversies surrounding lidocaine (LIDO), a widely recognized local anesthetic, by exploring its multifaceted effects on pain control in the perioperative setting. The article critically analyzes debates about lidocaine's efficacy, safety, and optimal administration methods. While acknowledging its well-documented analgesic attributes, the text highlights the ongoing controversies in its application. The goal is to provide clinicians with a comprehensive understanding of the current discourse, enabling informed decisions about incorporating lidocaine into perioperative protocols. On the other hand, emphasizes the common uses of lidocaine and its potential role in personalized medicine. It discusses the medication's versatility, including its application in anesthesia, chronic pain, and cardiovascular diseases. The text recognizes lidocaine's widespread use in medical practice and its ability to be combined with other drugs, showcasing its adaptability for individualized treatments. Additionally, it explores the incorporation of lidocaine into hyaluronic acid injections and its impact on pharmacokinetics, signaling innovative approaches. The discussion centers on how lidocaine, within the realm of personalized medicine, can offer safer and more comfortable experiences for patients through tailored treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Silva
- PerMed Research Group, Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Rua Doutor Plácido da Costa, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal;
- CINTESIS@RISE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal;
| | - Joana Mourão
- CINTESIS@RISE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal;
- Department of Anesthesiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- Surgery and Physiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Rua Doutor Plácido da Costa, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
| | - Nuno Vale
- PerMed Research Group, Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Rua Doutor Plácido da Costa, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal;
- CINTESIS@RISE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal;
- Department of Community Medicine, Health Information and Decision (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Rua Doutor Plácido da Costa, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wehrmann T, Riphaus A, Eckardt AJ, Klare P, Kopp I, von Delius S, Rosien U, Tonner PH. Updated S3 Guideline "Sedation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy" of the German Society of Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS) - June 2023 - AWMF-Register-No. 021/014. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023; 61:e654-e705. [PMID: 37813354 DOI: 10.1055/a-2165-6388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Till Wehrmann
- Clinic for Gastroenterology, DKD Helios Clinic Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Andrea Riphaus
- Internal Medicine, St. Elisabethen Hospital Frankfurt Artemed SE, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Alexander J Eckardt
- Clinic for Gastroenterology, DKD Helios Clinic Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Peter Klare
- Department Internal Medicine - Gastroenterology, Diabetology, and Hematology/Oncology, Hospital Agatharied, Hausham, Germany
| | - Ina Kopp
- Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany e.V. (AWMF), Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan von Delius
- Medical Clinic II - Internal Medicine - Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology, Hematology, and Oncology, RoMed Clinic Rosenheim, Rosenheim, Germany
| | - Ulrich Rosien
- Medical Clinic, Israelite Hospital, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter H Tonner
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Clinic Leer, Leer, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wehrmann T, Riphaus A, Eckardt AJ, Klare P, Kopp I, von Delius S, Rosien U, Tonner PH. Aktualisierte S3-Leitlinie „Sedierung in der gastrointestinalen Endoskopie“ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS). ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023; 61:1246-1301. [PMID: 37678315 DOI: 10.1055/a-2124-5333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Till Wehrmann
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, DKD Helios Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Deutschland
| | - Andrea Riphaus
- Innere Medizin, St. Elisabethen Krankenhaus Frankfurt Artemed SE, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - Alexander J Eckardt
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, DKD Helios Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Deutschland
| | - Peter Klare
- Abteilung Innere Medizin - Gastroenterologie, Diabetologie und Hämato-/Onkologie, Krankenhaus Agatharied, Hausham, Deutschland
| | - Ina Kopp
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V. (AWMF), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Stefan von Delius
- Medizinische Klinik II - Innere Medizin - Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Endokrinologie, Hämatologie und Onkologie, RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim, Rosenheim, Deutschland
| | - Ulrich Rosien
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Peter H Tonner
- Anästhesie- und Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Leer, Leer, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wu X, Zeng L, Zhang T, Wu W, Tian Y, Dong S. The study of different dosages of remazolam combined with sufentanil and propofol on painless gastroscopy: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e34731. [PMID: 37653789 PMCID: PMC10470722 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000034731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroscopy is one of the most commonly used diagnostic modalities for upper gastrointestinal disorders. Remazolam besylate, a new type of ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine drug, has been less studied in gastroscopy. In this study, we studied the efficacy and safety of remazolam combined with propofol for painless gastroscopy. METHODS This is a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. Hundred patients undergoing painless gastroscopy were included in this study and randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 50 per group): the remazolam 3 mg group (R3 group) and the remazolam 6 mg group (R6 group). Sufentanil, remazolam, and propofol are used to anesthetize the patients, and then, the effects of different dosages of remazolam on these patients are compared and analyzed. The patient's general condition, vital signs at different times, the dosage of propofol (mg) and additional times, complications, duration of gastroscopy (minute), awakening time (minute), residence time in the resuscitation room (minute), and adverse reactions were recorded. RESULTS R3 group systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure are more stable (P < .05); The number of additional propofol in R6 group was less (P < .05). The incidence of hypotension was lower in R3 group, as well as the time of awakening and staying in the resuscitation room were shorter (P < .05). CONCLUSION Remazolam 3mg combined with sufentanil and propofol have less effect on hemodynamics in painless gastroscopy, and the patients have shorter awakening time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaohong Wu
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, China National Nuclear Corporation 416 Hospital, Chengdu, China
- Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Lin Zeng
- Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
- Shifang People’s Hospital, Shifang, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Tianyao Zhang
- Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
- Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Wei Wu
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, China National Nuclear Corporation 416 Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Ying Tian
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, China National Nuclear Corporation 416 Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Shuhua Dong
- Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
- Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Karki Y, Sarna R, Singh N, Chauhan R, Meena SC, Luthra A, Thappa P. Prevention of pain on injection of propofol using ice gel pack versus pre-treatment with lignocaine: a randomized controlled trial. J Anesth 2023:10.1007/s00540-023-03216-1. [PMID: 37314584 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-023-03216-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Regardless of the positive attributes of propofol, it is frequently associated with pain on injection. We compared the efficacy of topical cold thermotherapy using an ice gel pack with intravenous lignocaine pre-treatment for reducing pain on propofol injection. METHODS This single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted in 200 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I, II, and III patients scheduled for elective/emergency surgery under general anesthesia. The patients were randomized into two groups: the Thermotherapy group- receiving an ice gel pack proximal to the intravenous cannula for 1 min, or the Lignocaine group-receiving 0.5 mg/kg of lignocaine administered intravenously, with occlusion proximal to the site of the intravenous cannula for 30 s. The primary objective was to compare the overall incidence of pain after propofol injection. The secondary objectives included the incidence of discomfort on the application of an ice gel pack, comparison of dose of propofol needed for induction, and hemodynamic changes at induction, between the two groups. RESULTS Fourteen patients in the lignocaine group and 15 patients in the thermotherapy group reported pain. The incidence of pain and the distribution of pain scores were comparable among groups (p = 1.00). Patients of the lignocaine group required significantly less amount of propofol for induction as compared to the thermotherapy group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION Topical thermotherapy using an ice gel pack was not found superior to lignocaine pre-treatment in alleviating pain on injection of propofol injection. However, topical cold therapy using an ice pack remains a non-pharmacological technique that is easily available, reproducible, and cost-effective. Further studies are required to prove its equivalence to lignocaine pre-treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION CTRI (CTRI/2021/04/032950).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rashi Sarna
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Nidhi Singh
- Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226014, India
| | - Rajeev Chauhan
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
| | - Shayam Charan Meena
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Ankur Luthra
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shafa A, Abediny R, Shetabi H, Shahhosseini S. The Effect of Preoperative Combined with Intravenous Lidocaine and Ketamine vs. Intravenous Ketamine on Pediatric Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Anesth Pain Med 2023; 13:e130991. [PMID: 37645009 PMCID: PMC10461382 DOI: 10.5812/aapm-130991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Ketamine is widely used in pediatric sedation. New studies have recommended combination therapy to reduce the side effects of ketamine. Objectives This study investigated the effect of adding intravenous (IV) lidocaine to ketamine on hemodynamic parameters, endoscopist satisfaction, and recovery time of children undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods This triple-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted in Isfahan, Iran (2021). One hundred twenty children between the ages of 1 and 6 were enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups. The intervention group received 1.0 mg/kg of IV lidocaine and 1.0 mg/kg of IV ketamine, and the placebo group received 1.0 mg/kg of IV ketamine and placebo 2 minutes before entering the endoscopic room. Patients in both groups were sedated with 1.0 mg/kg of propofol, 0.1 mg/kg of midazolam, and 2.0 ug/kg of fentanyl for the procedure. The pulse rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation were recorded 1 minute before injection and every 5 minutes afterward. Results The mean (SD) ages of the intervention and control groups were 3.4 (1.5) and 3.4 (1.7), respectively. The mean difference in hemodynamic parameters between the 2 groups was insignificant during the investigation (P > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant differences were found regarding endoscopist satisfaction scores and length of recovery room stay (P > 0.05). Conclusions Adding low-dose IV lidocaine to ketamine for pediatric sedation does not significantly affect the hemodynamic status, endoscopist satisfaction, and recovery time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Shafa
- Department of Anesthesiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Reza Abediny
- Department of Anesthesiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Hamidreza Shetabi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Sedighe Shahhosseini
- Department of Anesthesiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang J, Wang X, Liu H, Han R. Effect of butorphanol on visceral pain in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2023; 23:93. [PMID: 36977981 PMCID: PMC10044711 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02053-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Butorphanol slightly influences the respiratory and circulatory systems, has a better effect on relieving the discomfort caused by mechanical traction, and has a low incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Combined butorphanol and propofol may suppress postoperative visceral pain, which is avoidable in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Thus, we hypothesized that butorphanol could decrease the incidence of postoperative visceral pain in patients undergoing gastroscopy and colonoscopy. METHODS This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blinded trial. Patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomized to intravenously receive either butorphanol (Group I) or normal saline (Group II). The primary outcome was visceral pain after the procedure 10 min after recovery. The secondary outcomes included the rate of safety outcomes and adverse events. Postoperative visceral pain was defined as a visual analog scale (VAS) score ≥ 1. RESULTS A total of 206 patients were enrolled in the trial. Ultimately, 203 patients were randomly assigned to Group I (n = 102) or Group II (n = 101). In total, 194 patients were included in the analysis: 95 in Group I and 99 in Group II. The incidence of visceral pain at 10 min after recovery was found to be statistically lower with butorphanol than with the placebo (31.5% vs. 68.5%, respectively; RR: 2.738, 95% CI [1.409-5.319], P = 0.002), and the notable difference was in pain level or distribution of visceral pain (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS The trial indicated that adding butorphanol to propofol results in a lower incidence of visceral pain after surgery without noticeable fluctuations in circulatory and respiratory functions for gastrointestinal endoscopy patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04477733 (PI: Ruquan Han; date of registration: 20/07/2020).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, Southwest 4Th Ring RD, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, PR , China
- Department of Anesthesiology, DaxingDistrict, Beijing Daxing People's Hospital, No. 26, Huangcun West Street, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xinyan Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, Southwest 4Th Ring RD, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, PR , China
| | - Haiyang Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, Southwest 4Th Ring RD, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, PR , China
| | - Ruquan Han
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, Southwest 4Th Ring RD, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, PR , China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Kumari P, Kumar A. Evaluation of Propofol-Sparing Effect of Intravenous Lignocaine in Patients Undergoing Daycare Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures. Cureus 2022; 14:e32090. [PMID: 36601143 PMCID: PMC9803997 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Propofol is the most common sedative for endoscopies. Propofol alone may require larger doses for adequate level of sedation. Lignocaine is known for its anesthetic-sparing effect. We tested whether the addition of intravenous lignocaine to propofol-based sedation reduces its dose. Methods This prospective, randomized study was performed on 90 patients of 18 to 60 years of age, of either sex of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade-I & II, and was divided into two groups. Group L + P received IV bolus of 1.5 mg/kg 2% lignocaine over 10 minutes followed by 1.5 mg/ kg/ h infusion and group NS + P- received the equivalent volumes of normal saline in bolus and infusion. Patients were induced with fentanyl (2 µg/kg) and propofol (1 mg/kg). To maintain an adequate sedation level, a supplemental bolus of 0.5 mg /kg propofol was administered. The outcomes recorded were the total and supplemental amount of propofol administered, as well as recovery time. Results The mean supplemental propofol for group L + P and group NS + P- 37.00 ± 29.93 and 58.67 ± 19.49 mg, respectively and mean total propofol consumption was 98.22 ± 34.00 mg and 131.11 ± 23.18 mg, respectively, (p < 0.001). Mean recovery time in group L + P was also shorter (5.22 ± 2.14 versus 9.96 ± 2.14). The incidence of adverse events like gag reflux, upper airway obstruction, pain on injection, and hypotension was significantly lower in group L + P (p < 0.05). Conclusion The addition of lignocaine to propofol-based sedation reduced the overall propofol requirement at the same time maintaining hemodynamic stability, spontaneous respiration, and early recovery.
Collapse
|
14
|
Qi XR, Sun JY, An LX, Zhang K. Effect of intravenous lidocaine on the ED 50 of propofol for inserting gastroscope without body movement in adult patients: a randomized, controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22:319. [PMID: 36253717 PMCID: PMC9575225 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01861-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Circulatory and respiratory depression are common problems that occur in propofol alone sedation during gastroscopy. As a widely used analgesic adjuvant, intravenous lidocaine can reduce the consumption of propofol during Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or colonoscopy. However, it is still unknown the median effective dose (ED50) of propofol when combined with lidocaine intravenously. This study aimed to compare the ED50 of propofol with or without intravenous lidocaine for inserting gastrointestinal endoscope successfully. Methods Fifty nine patients undergoing gastroscopy or gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy were randomly divided into control group (Group C, normal saline + propofol) or lidocaine group (Group L, lidocaine + propofol). Patients were initially injected a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine in Group L, whereas equivalent volume of 0.9% saline in Group C. Anaesthesia was then induced with a single bolus of propofol in all subjects. The induction dose of propofol was determined by the modified Dixon’s up-and-down method, and the initial dose was 1.5 mg/kg in both groups. The primary outcome was the ED50 of propofol induction dose with or without intravenous lidocaine. The secondary outcomes were the induction time, the first propofol bolus time (FPBT: from MOAA/S score ≤ 1 to first rescue bolus propofol), and adverse events (AEs: hypoxemia, bradycardia, hypotension, and body movements). Results Totally, 59 patients were enrolled and completed this study. The ED50 of propofol combined with lidocaine was 1.68 ± 0.11 mg/kg, significantly reduced compared with the normal saline group, 1.88 ± 0.13 mg/kg (P = 0.002). There was no statistical difference in induction time (P = 0.115) and the FPBT (P = 0.655) between the two groups. There was no significantly difference about the AEs between the two groups. Conclusion The ED50 of propofol combined with intravenous lidocaine for successful endoscope insertion in adult patients, was 1.68 ± 0.11 mg/kg significantly reduced compared with the control group. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, No: ChiCTR2200059450. Registered on 29 April 2022. Prospective registration. http://www.chictr.org.cn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiu-Ru Qi
- Department of Anesthesia, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Jing-Yi Sun
- Department of Anesthesia, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Li-Xin An
- Department of Anesthesia, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
| | - Ke Zhang
- Department of Anesthesia, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nongnuang K, Limprasert N, Munjupong S. Can intravenous lidocaine definitely attenuate propofol requirement and improve outcomes among colonoscopic patients under intravenous sedation?: A double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30670. [PMID: 36181015 PMCID: PMC9524969 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Propofol-sparing effect of lidocaine has not been fully elucidated because propofol is usually mixed with many medications in anesthetic practice. Therefore, the study aimed to verify the additive effect of intravenous lidocaine to propofol without other sedative medications and control the depth of anesthesia using the bispectral index (BIS) during colonoscopy in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial. METHODS Sixty-eight patients scheduled and undergoing colonoscopy were randomly allocated to receive intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg then 4 mg/kg/h) (Group L) or a similar volume of normal saline (Group C) with propofol administration guided by BIS monitoring. The primary outcome was total propofol requirements between group comparisons. The secondary outcomes included the number of hypoxemic periods, hemodynamic changes, duration in returning of BIS > 85, sedation scores, pain scores, postoperative opioid requirement, and patient satisfaction between group comparisons. RESULTS Intravenous lidocaine showed significantly reduced total propofol use (151.76 ± 50.78 mg vs 242.06 ± 50.86 mg, Group L vs Group C, respectively, P < .001). Duration in returning to BIS > 85, sedation scores, and patient satisfaction scores were significantly superior in Group L (P < .05). The number of hypoxemic episodes, changes of hemodynamic response, pain scores, and postoperative opioid requirement were similar in both groups. No adverse effects were detected in both groups. CONCLUSION Intravenous lidocaine produced a definitely effective reduced propofol requirement without other sedative agents and improved outcomes including patient satisfaction, duration in returning to BIS > 85, and sedation score during colonoscopy without adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krisana Nongnuang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Natirat Limprasert
- Department of Anesthesiology, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sithapan Munjupong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
- *Correspondence: Sithapan Munjupong, Department of Anesthesiology, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok 10400, Thailand (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Qi XR, Sun JY, An LX, Zhang K, Xue FS. Effects of intravenous lidocaine on hypoxemia induced by propofol-based sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:800. [PMID: 36153625 PMCID: PMC9509543 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06719-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Oxygen-desaturation episodes, blood pressure drops, and involuntary body movement are common problems that occur in propofol-based sedation in the procedure of painless gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. As a widely used analgesic adjuvant, intravenous lidocaine can reduce the consumption of propofol during ERCP or colonoscopy. However, it is still unknown how lidocaine affects the incidence of oxygen-desaturation episodes and cardiovascular events, and involuntary movement during painless GI endoscopy. Therefore, we aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of intravenous lidocaine in propofol-based sedation for GI endoscopy.
Methods
We will conduct a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, saline-controlled trial. A total number of 300 patients undergoing painless GI procedures will be enrolled and randomly divided into the lidocaine group (Group L) and the control group (Group C). After midazolam and sufentanil intravenous injection, a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine was immediately injected and followed by a continuous infusion of 4 mg/kg/h in the lidocaine group, whereas the same volumes of saline solution in the control group. Then, propofol was titrated to produce unconsciousness during the procedure. The primary outcome will be the incidence of oxygen-desaturation episodes. Secondary outcomes will be the incidence of involuntary body movement, discomfort symptoms, propofol consumption, endoscopist, and patient satisfaction.
Discussion
Propofol-based deep sedation without intubation is widely used in painless GI endoscopy. However, adverse events such as hypoxemia often occur clinically. We expect to assess the effect of lidocaine on reducing the incidence of oxygen-desaturation episodes, cardiovascular events, and involuntary body movement. We believe that the results of this trial will provide an effective and safe method for painless GI endoscopy.
Trial registration
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100053818. Registered on 30 November 2021.
Collapse
|
17
|
Yang L, He T, Liu MX, Han SQ, Wu ZA, Hao W, Lu ZX. The effect of intravenous lidocaine on propofol dosage in painless bronchoscopy of patients with COPD. Front Surg 2022; 9:872916. [PMID: 36189388 PMCID: PMC9520192 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.872916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundWe tested the hypothesis that intravenous (IV) lidocaine reduces propofol requirements in painless bronchoscopy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).MethodsA total of 93 patients who underwent bronchoscopy were included in this randomized placebo-controlled study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. After the IV doses of nalbuphine, patients were given a bolus of propofol, which was titrated if necessary until loss of consciousness. Then patients were given IV lidocaine (2 mg/kg then 4 mg/kg/h) or the same volume of saline. The primary endpoint was the propofol requirements. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of hypoxemia, the incidence of cough during glottis examination, the systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) during bronchoscopy procedures, the bronchoscopist's comforts, and the time for wakefulness before recovery.ResultsLidocaine infusion resulted in a significant reduction in propofol requirements (p < .0001), and the incidence of hypoxemia (p = .001) and cough (p = .003) during examination decreased significantly in the lidocaine group. During the examination, the fluctuation of SBP and HR was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < .05). Bronchoscopist's comforts were higher in the lidocaine group (p < .001), and time for wakefulness (p < .001) were significantly lower in the lidocaine group.ConclusionIn painless bronchoscopy in patients with COPD, IV infusion of lidocaine resulted in a reduction in propofol dose requirements and reduce the incidence of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hebei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Tao He
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hebei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Min-Xiao Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hebei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Shi-Qiang Han
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hebei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Zhi-Ang Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Luquan Second People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Wei Hao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hebei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, China
- Correspondence: Zhi-Xia Lu Wei Hao
| | - Zhi-Xia Lu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hebei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, China
- Correspondence: Zhi-Xia Lu Wei Hao
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhang J, Kong L, Ni J. ED50 and ED95 of Propofol Combined with Different Doses of Intravenous Lidocaine for First-Trimester Uterine Aspiration: A Prospective Dose-Finding Study Using Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Method. Drug Des Devel Ther 2022; 16:3343-3352. [PMID: 36199630 PMCID: PMC9527702 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s382412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to test the effect of different doses of intravenous lidocaine on the median effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) of propofol-induction dose and identify the optimal dose. Patients and Methods Patients undergoing first-trimester uterine aspiration were screened and randomly enrolled into the following groups: saline (L0), 0.5 mg/kg lidocaine (L0.5), 1.0 mg/kg lidocaine (L1.0), and 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine (L1.5). Anesthesia was induced with 1.0 µg/kg fentanyl. Prepared lidocaine or saline solution was injected later according to allocation, followed by propofol. The dose of propofol for each patient was determined using the up-and-down sequential study design. The primary end point was the ED50 and ED95 of the propofol-induction dose. The total propofol doses, awakening time, and adverse events were recorded. Results The ED50 (95% confidence interval) of propofol was significantly lower in groups L1.0 and L1.5 than group L0 (1.6 [1.5–1.7] mg/kg and 1.8 [1.6–1.9] mg/kg, versus 2.4 [2.3–2.5] mg/kg, respectively; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in ED50 between groups L1.0 and L1.5 (p>0.05). However, surprisingly, the ED50 was significantly higher in group L0.5 than L0 (2.8 [2.6–3.0] mg/kg vs 2.4 [2.3–2.5] mg/kg; p<0.05). The total doses of propofol in groups L1.0 and L1.5 were lower than those in groups L0 and L0.5 (p<0.05). The systolic blood pressure (SBP) decline after anesthesia induction in group L0.5 was greater than that in group L0 (p<0.01). The incidence of respiratory depression in group L0.5 was greater than that in groups L0 and L1.0 (p<0.05). Conclusion In patients who underwent first-trimester uterine aspiration, intravenous lidocaine 1.0 mg/kg prior to propofol injection significantly reduced the ED50 of propofol induction dose without severe side effects, equivalent to the effect of 1.5 mg/kg dose. We recommend 1.0 mg/kg as the optimal dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingwen Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Linglingli Kong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Juan Ni
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Juan Ni, Department of Anesthesiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, No. 20, Section 3, South of Renmin Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 18180609890, Fax +86 2885503752, Email
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hu S, Wang M, Li S, Zhou W, Zhang Y, Shi H, Ye P, Sun J, Liu F, Zhang W, Zheng L, Hou Q, Wang Y, Sun W, Chen Y, Lu Z, Ji Z, Liao L, Lv X, Wang Y, Wang X, Yang H. Intravenous Lidocaine Significantly Reduces the Propofol Dose in Elderly Patients Undergoing Gastroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Drug Des Devel Ther 2022; 16:2695-2705. [PMID: 35983429 PMCID: PMC9381011 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s377237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Propofol-based sedation has been widely used for gastroscopy, but the risk of respiratory suppression in elderly patients should not be overlooked. Intravenous (IV) lidocaine during surgery can reduce the demand for propofol and the incidence of cardiopulmonary complications. We examined whether IV lidocaine reduces the dose of propofol and the occurrence of adverse events during gastroscopy in elderly patients. Methods We conducted a prospective, single-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial in elderly patients aged ≥65 years with ASA I-II. Subjects were randomly assigned to the lidocaine group (Group L, n=70), who received IV 1.5 mg kg−1 lidocaine followed by a continuous infusion of 4 mg kg−1 h−1 lidocaine, or the normal saline group (Group N, n=70), who received an equal volume of saline in the same way. Results IV lidocaine reduced the total and maintenance propofol dose in Group L (p<0.001), with no significant effect on the induction dose. The incidence of intraoperative hypoxia (p=0.035), emergency airway management events (p=0.005), duration of gastroscopy (p<0.05), consciousness recovery time (p<0.001), and postoperative pain (p=0.009) were all reduced in Group L. Patient (p=0.025) and gastroscopist (p=0.031) satisfaction was higher in Group L. Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, the respiratory rate, the incidence of sedation-related events and anesthesiologist satisfaction were similar between the two groups. Conclusion IV lidocaine can significantly reduce the amount of propofol, the incidence of hypoxia and postoperative pain during gastroscopy in elderly patients, with a higher patient and gastroscopist satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Song Hu
- Graduate School, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, 241002, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China
| | - Mingxia Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China
| | - Siyu Li
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wenyu Zhou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yi Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| | - Haobing Shi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| | - Pengcheng Ye
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jixiong Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| | - Feng Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| | - Li Zheng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qianhao Hou
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yue Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| | - Weixin Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yuanli Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhenzhen Lu
- Department of Biostatistics, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhonghua Ji
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lijun Liao
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xin Lv
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yinglin Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiangrui Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hao Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Hao Yang; Xiangrui Wang, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 150 Jimo Road, Shanghai, 200120, People’s Republic of China, Email ;
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Song N, Shan XS, Yang Y, Zheng Z, Shi WC, Yang XY, Li Y, Tan AP, Liu H, Peng K, Ji FH. Low-Dose Esketamine as an Adjuvant to Propofol Sedation for Same-Visit Bidirectional Endoscopy: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Gen Med 2022; 15:4733-4740. [PMID: 35571286 PMCID: PMC9091685 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s365068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Same-visit bidirectional endoscopy (esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy) is widely performed under sedation. At present, the optimal sedation regimen remains unclear. This study aims to test the hypothesis that a low-dose esketamine added to propofol sedation reduces hemodynamic and respiratory adverse events in these procedures. Methods In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 660 adult patients scheduled for same-visit bidirectional endoscopy under sedation from 3 teaching hospitals in China will be recruited. Patients will be randomly allocated, in a 1:1 ratio, to an esketamine group or a normal saline group (n = 330 in each group), stratified by study center. All patients will receive intravenous propofol 0.5 mg/kg and sufentanil 0.1 μg/mL for induction of sedation, followed by intravenous esketamine 0.15 mg/kg or the same volume of normal saline. Propofol will be titrated to the target sedation levels during the procedures. The primary endpoint is a composite of desaturation (peripheral oxygen saturation < 90%) and hypotension (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg or decrease >30% of baseline). Secondary endpoints include desaturation, hypotension, total dose of propofol, pain scores and fatigue scores on the 0-10 numerical rating scale, dizziness or headache, hallucination or nightmare, nausea or vomiting, endoscopist satisfaction, and patient satisfaction. All analyses will be intention-to-treat. Discussion We expect that a low-dose esketamine adjunct to propofol-based sedation will improve cardiorespiratory stability in patients undergoing same-visit bidirectional endoscopy, providing reference for clinical sedation practice during these procedures. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Identifier: ChiCTR-ChiCTR2200055938).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Song
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xi-Sheng Shan
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yi Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, the People’s Hospital of SND, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhong Zheng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Taicang First People’s Hospital, Taicang, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wen-Cheng Shi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Taicang First People’s Hospital, Taicang, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Yan Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, the People’s Hospital of SND, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, the People’s Hospital of SND, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ai-Ping Tan
- Department of Anesthesiology, the People’s Hospital of SND, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hong Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Ke Peng
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fu-Hai Ji
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Prabhakar NK, Chadwick AL, Nwaneshiudu C, Aggarwal A, Salmasi V, Lii TR, Hah JM. Management of Postoperative Pain in Patients Following Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review. Int J Gen Med 2022; 15:4535-4549. [PMID: 35528286 PMCID: PMC9075013 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s292698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Perioperative pain management is a unique challenge in patients undergoing spine surgery due to the increased incidence of both pre-existing chronic pain conditions and chronic postsurgical pain. Peri-operative planning and counseling in spine surgery should involve an interdisciplinary approach that includes consideration of patient-level risk factors, as well as pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic pain management techniques. Consideration of psychological factors and patient focused education as an adjunct to these measures is paramount in developing a personalized perioperative pain management plan. Understanding the currently available body of knowledge surrounding perioperative opioid management, management of opioid use disorder, regional/neuraxial anesthetic techniques, ketamine/lidocaine infusions, non-opioid oral analgesics, and behavioral interventions can be useful in developing a comprehensive, multi-modal treatment plan among patients undergoing spine surgery. Although many of these techniques have proved efficacious in the immediate postoperative period, long-term follow-up is needed to define the impact of such approaches on persistent pain and opioid use. Future techniques involving the use of precision medicine may help identify phenotypic and physiologic characteristics that can identify patients that are most at risk of developing persistent postoperative pain after spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitin K Prabhakar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Andrea L Chadwick
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Perioperative Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Chinwe Nwaneshiudu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anuj Aggarwal
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Vafi Salmasi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Theresa R Lii
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer M Hah
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
He T, Liu C, Lu ZX, Kong LL, Li Y, Xu Z, Dong YJ, Hao W. Effect of wrist-ankle acupuncture on propofol dosage during painless colonoscopy: A randomized controlled prospective study. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:3764-3772. [PMID: 35647164 PMCID: PMC9100732 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i12.3764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical advantages of painless colonoscopy can reduce the fear and discomfort of patients and increase the detection rate of diseases. Propofol has the characteristics of fast effect and short action time. It is a common choice for painless endoscopic sedation and anesthetics. However, propofol can cause severe respiratory and circulatory depression. Therefore, it is important to find a way to reduce the dose of propofol.
AIM To explore the effect of wrist-ankle acupuncture on propofol dose during colonoscopy.
METHODS Two hundred patients who were going to receive selective painless colonoscopy in Hebei Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were selected and divided into wrist-ankle acupuncture group (WAA group, n = 100) and control group (CON group, n = 100). After entering the operation room, patients were given 0.025 mg/kg nabufine intravenously and propofol at the initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg. In patients who did not fall asleep, propofol (10 mg/time) was given until loss of consciousness. Prior to anesthesia, patients in WAA group were punctured by specialist in the inferior 1, 2 and 3 regions according to the zoning principle of wrist-ankle acupuncture. The primary endpoint was required dose of propofol, and the secondary endpoints were the incidence of hypoxemia and hypotension. Furthermore, the following data were recorded: The operation time, wake-up time, incidence of nausea and vomiting, incidence of abdominal distention, post-colonoscopy pain, examiners' satisfaction, patients' satisfaction and Borg fatigue index. This study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration Code: ChiCTR1900022177).
RESULTS The induced dose of propofol and the total dose of propofol in WAA group were 80 mg and 110 mg, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in CON group (P < 0.05). The incidences of hypoxemia and hypotension in the WAA group were 2.2% and 3.3%, respectively, significantly lower than those in the CON group (P < 0.05). The incidence of abdominal distension in the WAA group was 8.8%, which was significantly lower than that in the CON group (P < 0.05, 28.9%). The waking time of WAA group was 3.26 ± 0.87 min, which was significantly lower than that of CON group (6.06 ± 0.88 min, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION Wrist-ankle acupuncture can reduce the induction dose and total dose of propofol as well as the incidence of adverse reactions in painless colonoscopy without affecting the satisfaction of examiners and patients. This procedure is simple in operation and easy to promote in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao He
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hebei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Chan Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hebei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Zhi-Xia Lu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hebei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Li-Li Kong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hebei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hebei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Zhe Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hebei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Ya-Jing Dong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hebei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Wei Hao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hebei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine for Gastroenterology Research (Hebei), Key Laboratory of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine for Gastroenterology Research (Hebei), Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhao K, Dong Y, Su G, Wang Y, Ji T, Wu N, Cui X, Li W, Yang Y, Chen X. Effect of Systemic Lidocaine on Postoperative Early Recovery Quality in Patients Undergoing Supratentorial Tumor Resection. Drug Des Devel Ther 2022; 16:1171-1181. [PMID: 35496368 PMCID: PMC9041358 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s359755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Lidocaine has been gradually used in general anesthesia. This study was designed to investigate the effect of systemic lidocaine on postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) in patients undergoing supratentorial tumor resection, and to explore its brain-injury alleviation effect in neurosurgical anesthesia. Patients and Methods Sixty adult patients undergoing elective supratentorial tumor resection. Patients were randomly assigned either to receive lidocaine (Group L: 1.5 mg/kg bolus completed 10 min before anesthesia induction followed by an infusion at 2.0 mg/kg/h) or to receive normal saline (Group C: received volume-matched normal saline at the same infusion rate). Primary outcome measures were Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) scores on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 2. Plasma concentrations of S100B protein (S100B), neuron specific enolase (NSE), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) before anesthesia induction and at the end of surgery were assessed. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were assessed at 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery. Perioperative parameters and adverse events were also recorded. Results Patients between two groups had comparable baseline characteristics. Global QoR-40 scores on POD 1 and POD 2 were significantly higher (P <0.001) in group L (165.5±3.8 vs 173.7±4.7) than those in group C (155.6±4.0 vs 163.2±4.5); and scores of physical comfort, emotional state, and pain in group L were superior to those in group C (P <0.05). In group L, patients possessed lower plasma concentration of pro-inflammatory factors (IL-6, TNF-α) and brain injury-related factors (S100B, NSE) (P <0.05), consumed less remifentanil and propofol, and experienced lower pain intensity. Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated age and pain were correlated with postperative recovery quality. Conclusion Systemic lidocaine improved early recovery quality after supratentorial tumor resection with general anesthesia, and had certain brain-injury alleviation effects. These benefits may be attributed to the inflammation-alleviating and analgesic properties of lidocaine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Zhao
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yushan Dong
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Gaowei Su
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yaolin Wang
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tao Ji
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Nanling Wu
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaojie Cui
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wenzhan Li
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yanming Yang
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiuxia Chen
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Xiuxia Chen, Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221000, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 18052268332, Fax +0516-8346-9496, Email
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Long YQ, Feng CD, Ding YY, Feng XM, Liu H, Ji FH, Peng K. Esketamine as an Adjuvant to Ciprofol or Propofol Sedation for Same-Day Bidirectional Endoscopy: Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial With Factorial Design. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:821691. [PMID: 35370640 PMCID: PMC8975265 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.821691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Same-day esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy procedures under sedation have been increasingly performed. This study aims to assess the effects of esketamine combined with ciprofol (a novel anesthetic/sedative agent) or propofol on respiratory and hemodynamic adverse events in patients undergoing same-day bidirectional endoscopy. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial. A total of 180 adult patients scheduled for same-day bidirectional endoscopy under sedation will be randomized, in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, to receive 1 of 4 sedation regimens: 1) ciprofol and esketamine, 2) propofol and esketamine, 3) ciprofol and normal saline placebo, or 4) propofol and normal saline placebo. The primary outcome is a composite of desaturation [peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) < 95%] and hypotension [mean blood pressure (MBP) < 65 mmHg or decrease in MBP ≥20% of baseline] during the sedation and in the recovery room. Secondary outcomes include episodes of desaturation, severe desaturation (SpO2 < 90%), hypotension, severe hypotension (decrease in MBP ≥30% of baseline), bradycardia, postoperative nausea and vomiting, dizziness or headache, hallucination or nightmare, injection pain, pain scores and fatigue scores, endoscopist satisfaction, and patient satisfaction. Data will be analyzed on the modified intention-to-treat basis. Discussion: We hypothesize that esketamine as an adjuvant to ciprofol or propofol sedation would improve cardiorespiratory stability. In addition, the potential interactions between interventions will be explored using the factorial design. The results of this trial will provide evidence for daily practice of sedation regimens for same-day bidirectional endoscopy. Clinical Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, Identifier ChiCTR2100052523.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-qin Long
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Chang-dong Feng
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yun-ying Ding
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Xiao-mei Feng
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Hong Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | - Fu-hai Ji
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Ke Peng, ; Fu-hai Ji,
| | - Ke Peng
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Ke Peng, ; Fu-hai Ji,
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fattah Kamel AA, Abdel Naby SM, Elmesallamy WARA, Salem DAE. Opioid sparing analgesia: Continuous intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine versus lidocaine for intracranial surgeries in children: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/11101849.2022.2048580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alshaimaa Abdel Fattah Kamel
- Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management Department, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Alsharkia, Egypt
| | - Sara Mohamed Abdel Naby
- Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management Department, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Alsharkia, Egypt
| | | | - Dina Abdelhameed Elsadek Salem
- Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management Department, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Alsharkia, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Li M, Ke W, Zhuang S. Effect of intravenous lidocaine on propofol consumption in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22:61. [PMID: 35246030 PMCID: PMC8895527 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01601-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy with propofol as sedation are prone to respiratory or cardiovascular complications. Intravenous lidocaine has analgesic efficacy and reduces propofol consumption during surgery. Here, the effect of intravenous lidocaine on propofol consumption was evaluated in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS Patients were randomly allocated to receive intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg bolus dose, followed by a 2 mg/kg/h continuous infusion during the procedure; Group L) or a placebo (saline; Group N). During the procedure, sedation was achieved by propofol. The following outcomes were recorded: total propofol consumption; time to loss of consciousness; number of airway modifications; time to the first airway intervention; incidence of sedation-related events; pain score after awakening; endoscopists' and patients' satisfaction scores; memory level of the procedure; and adverse events within 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS Compared with Group N, propofol consumption was reduced by 13.2% in Group L (100.30 ± 25.29 mg vs. 115.58 ± 27.52 mg, respectively, p = 0.008). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the median time to the loss of consciousness episode was shorter in Group L than in Group N (40 s vs. 55 s, respectively, log rank p < 0.0001). The number of airway modifications, time to the first airway intervention, incidence of sedation-related events, time to awakening, pain score after awakening, endoscopists' and patients' satisfaction scores, memory level of the procedure and adverse events within 24 h postoperatively did not differ between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Intravenous lidocaine can reduce propofol consumption in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy, with quicker time to loss of consciousness. TRIAL REGISTRATION The clinical trial was registered at (12/01/2021, ChiCTR2100042001 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meizhen Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, No. 57 Changping Road, Jinping District, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Weiqi Ke
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, No. 57 Changping Road, Jinping District, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shaohui Zhuang
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, No. 57 Changping Road, Jinping District, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhou L, Wu R, Cai C, Qi Y, Bi X, Hang Q. The effects of target-controlled infusion of lidocaine undergoing vocal cord polypectomy: A randomized controlled trial (CONSORT compliant). Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e27642. [PMID: 35147085 PMCID: PMC8830819 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000027642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of general anesthesia-assisted target-controlled plasma infusion of lidocaine in patients with vocal cord polypectomy using a supporting laryngoscope. METHODS In total, 80 patients undergoing vocal cord polypectomy using a supporting laryngoscope were randomly divided into an intervention group and a control group; each group contained 40 subjects: both groups received general anesthesia; subjects in the intervention also received an additional 3 mg/L of lidocaine by target-controlled plasma infusion during induction and maintenance of anesthesia; heart rate (HR) mean arterial pressure (MAP), propofol and urapidil consumption (Uradil, which is a blood pressure drug that blocks alpha-1, is called Urapidi Hydrochloride Injection. It is produced by Germany, the enterprise name is Nycomed Deutschland GmbH, the import drug registration number is H20090715, and it is widely used in China), recovery time, and cough score (measured by Minogue et al's 5-grade scoring method) during extubation, and throat pain score (measured by visual analogue scale,[VAS]) after extubation and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS Significant differences were observed in HR (P < .05) and MAP (P < .05) immediately after intubation (T2), immediately after the operation starting to support laryngoscope exposure (T3), immediately after operation field adrenergic tampon hemostasis (T4), and 5 minutes after hemostasis (T5) between the 2 groups, and significant differences were also observed in HR (P < .05) before intubation (T1). Moreover, significant differences were observed in propofol consumption (P < .05), urapidil consumption (P < .05), cough score during extubation (P < .05), and throat pain score after extubation (P < .05). However, no significant difference was observed in the recovery time (P > .05). Furthermore, no adverse events were detected in either group. CONCLUSION The results of this study showed that target-controlled plasma infusion of lidocaine can reduce propofol consumption in patients undergoing vocal cord polypectomy by supporting laryngoscopy, and the hemodynamics are more stable and reduce the coughing reaction in the wake period and throat pain after extubation without adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Qi Hang
- Department of otolaryngology, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Guo H, Ao T, Wang J, Zhang X, Zheng J, Xiao Y, Xue R, Kalika P, Ran R. Clinical Efficacy of Perioperative Intravenous Dexmedetomidine and Lidocaine Combined Infusion for Thyroidectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Clin J Pain 2022; 38:264-270. [PMID: 35125385 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative dexmedetomidine (DEX) combined with lidocaine intravenous infusion on relieving postoperative pain and improving recovery for patients undergoing thyroidectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 138 patients undergoing thyroidectomy with general anesthesia were randomly divided into 4 groups: lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg bolus followed by 2 mg/kg/h infusion) in the group L, DEX (0.5 µg/kg) in the group D, lidocaine (same as the group L) with DEX (0.5 µg/kg) in the group L+D, and placebo as normal saline in the group C. All drugs were infused until the end of the surgery. The visual analog scale (VAS) scores of patients at 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours following surgery, opioid requirement, propofol consumption, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, awaking time, hemodynamic variables, and any adverse effects were assessed. RESULTS Compared with the group C, the VAS scores in the group L+D were significantly lower until 8 hours after surgery (P<0.05), while the VAS scores were significantly decreased just until 4 hours in the group L and 1 hour in the group D after surgery (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in opioid consumption between 4 groups. Propofol consumption in the group L+D was significantly lower than other groups (P<0.05). Compared with the group C, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the group L+D was lower (P<0.05), and awaking time in the group L+D and the group L was shorter (P<0.05). CONCLUSION DEX combined with lidocaine infusion can effectively attenuate the postoperative pain without any serious adverse events, which may improve postoperative recovery in patients undergoing thyroidectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Guo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Tingting Ao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Jiagao Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Xi Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Junwei Zheng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Yun Xiao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Rui Xue
- Department of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Prakash Kalika
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Om Hospital and Research Center, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Ran Ran
- Department of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Edalatkhah S, Hazrati E, Hashemi M, Golaghaei A, Kheradmand B, Rafiei M. Evaluation of anesthesia quality with three methods: "propofol + fentanyl" vs. "propofol + fentanyl + lidocaine" vs. "propofol + fentanyl + lidocaine + ketamine" in patients referred to the scoping ward. J Family Med Prim Care 2022; 11:672-676. [PMID: 35360792 PMCID: PMC8963641 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1387_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Toleration of the complexity and pain of interventions such as endoscopy and colonoscopy is highly difficult for patients. Considering the disagreement on the method of injection of propofol, this study was performed to evaluate the quality of anesthesia using the three methods of propofol + fentanyl, propofol + fentanyl + lidocaine, and propofol + fentanyl + lidocaine + ketamine. Methods: This one-way blind clinical trial study included 99 patients who were admitted in three groups by block randomization method. In a group of patients that were sedated with propofol + fentanyl + lidocaine + ketamine, the dose of all drugs is reduced by half the amount of the other groups. Variables included age, sex, frequency of cough, apnea, need for jaw thrust maneuver, O2 saturation, duration of recovery, and procedural satisfaction. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0. P value of < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Results: The three groups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics. The effects of the three sedation protocols on the variables showed that patient’s apnea, cough, O2 saturation, and also proceduralist satisfaction in the group of the patient that sedated with four drugs was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than other groups. But there was no significant difference between the three groups when comparing the recovery time and need for jaw thrust during the procedure. Conclusion: The findings of the present study showed that the use of combination of “propofol + fentanyl + lidocaine + ketamine” with lower doses, significantly results in higher quality sedation compared with higher doses of “propofol + fentanyl + lidocaine” or “propofol + fentanyl” for scoping procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sepehr Edalatkhah
- Research Center of Surgery and Trauma, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ebrahim Hazrati
- Research Center of Surgery and Trauma, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahmoodreza Hashemi
- Research Center of Surgery and Trauma, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alireza Golaghaei
- Research Center of Surgery and Trauma, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Behroz Kheradmand
- Research Center of Surgery and Trauma, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohamadreza Rafiei
- Research Center of Surgery and Trauma, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kovačević M, Rizvanović N, Adilović A, Smajić J, Sijerčić S. Ketamine as the main analgesic agent during analgesia-based sedation for elective colonoscopy – A randomised, double-blind, control study. Saudi J Anaesth 2022; 16:423-429. [PMID: 36337425 PMCID: PMC9630668 DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_488_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the analgesic effects of ketamine over fentanyl combined with propofol in analgesia-based elective colonoscopy with purpose of patient safety and satisfaction. Methods: This is a double-blinded prospective randomized controlled trial. Ninety patients were included and randomized to either fentanyl-propofol (Group FP, n: 30), ketamine-propofol (Group KP, n: 30) or propofol-control group (Group C, n: 30). Group FP patients received fentanyl and propofol, Group KP received ketamine and propofol and Group C, propofol. In all groups, incremental doses of propofol were used to maintain a Ramsay sedation score (RSS) of 5. Respiratory depression and hemodynamic parameters were monitored for the first minute and every 5 min during endoscopy. Fifteen minutes after the procedure, the degree of pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), the quality of recovery according to the Aldrete score (ARS), complications during and after the procedure and additional doses of propofol were recorded. Results: Mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 5 and 30 min (p < 0.05), heart rate (HR) at 15, 25 and 30 min (p < 0.05) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) at 30 min (p < 0.05) were statistically significant for Group FP. Desaturation (*p = 0.033), and weakness (*p = 0.004) was also significant for Group FP at 20, 25 and 30 min (p < 0.05). Pain was lower assessed for the Group KP according to the VAS (**p = 0.025). Conclusion: In analgesia-based colonoscopy, ketamine provides appropriate analgesia and less incidence of complications compared to fentanyl.
Collapse
|
31
|
Yao W, Zhang L, Lu G, Wang J, Zhang L, Wang Y, Xiao P, Chen X, Chen C, Zhou M. Use of intravenous lidocaine for dose reduction of propofol in paediatric colonoscopy patients: a randomised placebo-controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol 2021; 21:299. [PMID: 34852767 PMCID: PMC8638197 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01525-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Propofol, a widely used sedative in endoscopic procedures, sometimes causes cardiopulmonary complications. Intravenous lidocaine can diminish visceral pain and decrease the dose of propofol. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine in reducing propofol dosage during paediatric colonoscopy. METHODS Forty children who underwent colonoscopy were divided into two groups. Lidocaine hydrochloride (1.5 mg/kg induction and 2 mg/kg/h maintenance) was given intravenously to the lidocaine group, and the same amount of saline was given to the control group after they received lidocaine induction. Propofol initial plasma concentration of 5 μg/mL was targeted, and the procedure was performed after the bispectral index value reached 55. The primary outcome was propofol requirement. RESULTS The propofol requirement in the lidocaine group was decreased by 35.5% (128.6 ± 30.4 mg vs. 199.4 ± 57.6 mg; p < 0.001; 95%CI: - 100.60, - 41.02). The incidence of involuntary body movements was significantly lower in the lidocaine group (p = 0.028; OR = 0.17; 95%CI: 0.03, 0.92). The awakening time (p < 0.001; 95%CI: - 7.67, - 5.13) and recovery times (p < 0.001; 95%CI: - 7.45, - 4.35) were significantly lower in the lidocaine group. Pain was significantly less at 30 min and 60 min after the procedure in the lidocaine group (0 [0-4] vs. 3 [0-5], p < 0. 001; 0 [0-2] vs. 1 [0-3], p = 0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of bradycardia, hypotension, or hypoxia between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS For colonoscopy procedures in paediatric patients, intravenous lidocaine reduces the amount of propofol needed, provides better sedation and postprocedural pain management, as well as a reduction in recovery time. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered on November 6, 2020 at China Clinical Trials Registration Center ( www.chictr.org.cn ) ref.: ChiCTR 2,000,039,706.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenshui Yao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Longxin Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
| | - Guolin Lu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yuping Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Peihan Xiao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Xiaofen Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Chanjuan Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Min Zhou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 18 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Yuan C, Wang C, Wu J, Gao N, Li K, Li Y, Huang X, Huang W, Hu Z. Continuous infusion of lidocaine in pediatric colonoscopy: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2021; 28:54-59. [PMID: 34806658 PMCID: PMC8919925 DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_275_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Propofol is commonly used for providing procedural sedation during pediatric colonoscopy. Intravenous (i.v.) lidocaine can mitigate visceral pain and reduce propofol requirements during surgery. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of i.v. lidocaine on perioperative propofol and sufentanil dose, pulse oxygen saturation, postoperative pain score, and recovery time during pediatric colonoscopy. METHODS We designed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study and enrolled 40 children aged from 3 to 10 years who underwent colonoscopy. After titration of propofol to achieve unconsciousness, the patients were given i.v. lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg later 2 mg/kg/hour) or the same volume of saline. Sedation was standardized and combined propofol with sufentanil. The primary outcome variables were intraoperative propofol and sufentanil requirements, and the number of oxygen desaturation episodes. Secondary outcome variables were recovery time after colonoscopy and post-colonoscopy pain. RESULTS Lidocaine infusion resulted in a significant reduction in propofol requirements: (median (quartile) 1.8 (1.5-2.0) vs. 3.0 (2.8-3.3) mg/kg respectively; P < 0.001) and sufentanil requirements: (median (quartile) 0.06 (0.05-0.08) vs. 0.1 (0.1-0.1) μg/kg respectively; P < 0.001). The number of subjects who experienced oxygen desaturation below 95% in the lidocaine group was also significantly less than that in the control group: 1 vs. 6 (P = 0.04). The mean (SD) recovery time was significantly shorter in the lidocaine group: (19.2 (2.6) vs. 13.3 (2.6) min respectively; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in post-colonoscopy pain. CONCLUSION Continuous infusion of lidocaine resulted in reduction of propofol and sufentanil requirements, recovery time, and risk of hypoxemia during pediatric colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Yuan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, China
| | - Chengli Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, China
| | - Jiayao Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, China
| | - Ningyang Gao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, China
| | - Kunwei Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, China
| | - Yongle Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, China
| | - Xizhao Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, China
| | - Wei Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, China
| | - Zurong Hu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, China,Address for correspondence: Dr. Zurong Hu, Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China, No. 13 Guangyuan West Road, Guangzhou, 510010, China. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hung KC, Yew M, Lin YT, Chen JY, Wang LK, Chang YJ, Chang YP, Lan KM, Ho CN, Sun CK. Impact of intravenous and topical lidocaine on clinical outcomes in patients receiving propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Anaesth 2021; 128:644-654. [PMID: 34749993 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.08.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of i.v. or topical lidocaine as an anaesthesia adjunct in improving clinical outcomes in patients receiving gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under propofol sedation remains unclear. METHODS Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) were searched for RCTs comparing the clinical outcomes with or without lidocaine application (i.v. or topical) in patients receiving propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures from inception to 29 March 2021. The primary outcome was propofol dosage, while secondary outcomes included procedure time, recovery time, adverse events (e.g. oxygen desaturation), post-procedural pain, and levels of endoscopist and patient satisfaction. RESULTS Twelve trials (1707 patients) published between 2011 and 2020 demonstrated that addition of i.v. (n=7) or topical (n=5) lidocaine to propofol sedation decreased the level of post-procedural pain (standardised mean difference [SMD]=-0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.8 to -0.14), risks of gag events (risk ratio [RR]=0.51, 95% CI: 0.35-0.75), and involuntary movement (RR=0.4, 95% CI: 0.16-0.96). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that only i.v. lidocaine reduced propofol dosage required for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures (SMD=-0.83, 95% CI: -1.19 to -0.47), increased endoscopist satisfaction (SMD=0.75, 95% CI: 0.21-1.29), and shortened the recovery time (SMD=-0.83, 95% CI: -1.45 to -0.21). Intravenous or topical lidocaine did not affect the incidence of oxygen desaturation (RR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.41-1.24) or arterial hypotension (RR=0.6, 95% CI: 0.22-1.65) and procedure time (SMD=0.21, 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.51). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis demonstrated that i.v. or topical lidocaine appears safe to use and may be of benefit for improving propofol sedation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. Further large-scale trials are warranted to support our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuo-Chuan Hung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan; Department of Hospital and Health Care Administration, College of Recreation and Health Management, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Ming Yew
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Hospital, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Tsung Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan; Department of Hospital and Health Care Administration, College of Recreation and Health Management, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Yin Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Li-Kai Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan; Department of Hospital and Health Care Administration, College of Recreation and Health Management, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Jen Chang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan; Department of Recreation and Health-Care Management, College of Recreation and Health Management, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Yang-Pei Chang
- Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Mao Lan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Ning Ho
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Cheuk-Kwan Sun
- Department of Emergency Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan; College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gur STA, Ahiskalioglu EO, Aydin ME, Kocak AO, Aydin P, Ahiskalioglu A. Intravenous lidocaine vs. NSAIDs for migraine attack in the ED: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 78:27-33. [PMID: 34528122 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-021-03219-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although different forms of lidocaine are used for migraine attack headaches, the effect of intravenous lidocaine is still limited. This study aimed to investigate the effects of intravenous lidocaine infusion for the treatment of migraine attack headaches. METHODS A hundred patients with migraine attacks, aged between 18 and 65, were randomly divided into two groups. The lidocaine group (n = 50) received a 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine bolus and a 1 mg/kg infusion (first 30 min), followed by a 0.5 mg/kg infusion for a further 30 min intravenously. The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) group (n = 50) received 50 mg dexketoprofen trometamol and saline at the same volume as the lidocaine at the same time intervals intravenously. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, additional analgesia requirement, side effects, and revisits to the emergency department were recorded. RESULTS The VAS score was significantly lower in the lidocaine group than in the NSAID group for the first 20th and 30th minutes (p = 0.014 and p = 0.024, respectively). There was no difference between the VAS scores for the remaining evaluation times (p > 0.05). In terms of secondary outcomes, rescue medication requirement was not different between the two groups at both the 60th and 90th minutes (p > 0.05). However, the number of patients revisiting ED within 48-72 h was statistically less in the lidocaine group than in the NSAID group (1/50 vs. 8/50; p = 0.031). CONCLUSION Intravenous lidocaine may be an alternative treatment method for patients with migraine attack headaches in the emergency department.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sultan Tuna Akgol Gur
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Elif Oral Ahiskalioglu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University School of Medicine, 25070, Erzurum, Turkey. .,Clinical Research, Development and Design Application and Research Center, Ataturk University School of Medicine, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.
| | - Muhammed Enes Aydin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University School of Medicine, 25070, Erzurum, Turkey.,Clinical Research, Development and Design Application and Research Center, Ataturk University School of Medicine, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Abdullah Osman Kocak
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Pelin Aydin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Erzurum State Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Ali Ahiskalioglu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University School of Medicine, 25070, Erzurum, Turkey.,Clinical Research, Development and Design Application and Research Center, Ataturk University School of Medicine, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Aalbers T, van den Heuvel S, Bronkhorst E, van Esch A, Scheffer G, Vaneker M. Effects of intravenous lidocaine on alfentanil consumption during procedural sedation for colonoscopy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a randomized controlled trial. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA BELGICA 2021. [DOI: 10.56126/72.3.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background: Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is used during colonoscopy to facilitate the procedure and relieve patient’s discomfort. The foremost risk of PSA is respiratory depression. Lidocaine could be a promising additional analgesic in IBD patients to minimise side effects of PSA.
Objective: Our primary objective was to investigate whether i.v. lidocaine reduces the amount of alfentanil used during PSA in IBD patients. Additionally, we investigated whether lidocaine reduces cardiorespiratory incidents and the amount of propofol required during the procedure.
Design: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study.
Setting: Single-center study from November 2016 to December 2018.
Methods: Seventy-six patients with IBD, ASA 1 or 2, between 18 and 65 years, scheduled for colonoscopy with PSA were included. Exclusion criteria were: pregnancy, emergency colonoscopy, allergies for study medication, rhythm disorders, cardiomyopathy, BMI < 18 kg m -2 , BMI > 35 kg m -2 , obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and uncontrolled hypertension. Patients received lidocaine 1.5 mg kg -1 followed by a continuous infusion of 2 mg kg -1 h -1 (intervention group, n=38) or 0.9% saline in equivalent volumes (control group, n=38) during colonoscopy.
Main outcome measures: Amount of alfentanil and propofol used during the interventional procedure. Cardiorespiratory events as defined in methods during the colonoscopy.
Results: There was a not statistically significant reduction in the use of alfentanil [327 µg (95%CI=-31-505, p=0.082)] and propofol [39 mg (95%CI=-5-83, p=0.083)] in the lidocaine group compared with the control group. Ten patients (26%) in the control group and 8 patients in the lidocaine group (21%) experienced a period of hypoxia (p=0.788). In both groups, no periods of hypotension were noted.
Conclusion: Our investigation has shown a trend for reduced alfentanil and propofol consumption in patients receiving lidocaine during colonoscopy under sedation. The differences were not statistically significant. Lidocaine did not reduce the incidence of cardiorespiratory events.
Collapse
|
36
|
Kamal F, Khan MA, Lee-Smith W, Sharma S, Imam Z, Jowhar D, Henry C, Khan Z, Petryna E, Patel JR, Qualkenbush EAV, Howden CW. Efficacy and safety of supplemental intravenous lidocaine for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:1241-1249.e6. [PMID: 33485876 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Some studies have shown that intravenous (IV) lidocaine reduces the dose requirement of propofol in GI endoscopic procedures. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of IV lidocaine and propofol compared with propofol alone in GI endoscopic procedures. METHODS We reviewed several databases from inception to October 13, 2020, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the role of IV propofol and lidocaine with IV propofol plus placebo for sedation in endoscopic procedures. Our outcomes of interest were the differences in total dose of propofol administered, procedure time, and intraoperative adverse events. For categorical variables, we calculated pooled risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI); for continuous variables, we calculated standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI. Data were analyzed using a random effect model. We used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) framework to ascertain the quality of evidence. RESULTS We included 5 randomized controlled trials with 318 patients. We found that the total dose of propofol administered was significantly lower in the lidocaine group than the control group (SMD, -0.76; 95% CI, -1.09 to -0.42). We found no significant difference in procedure time (SMD, 0.16; 95% CI, -0.26 to 0.57) or adverse events (risk ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.35-1.03) between the groups. There was moderate to substantial heterogeneity in the data. Quality of evidence based on the GRADE framework ranged from low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS Moderate quality of evidence suggests that IV lidocaine decreases the dose of propofol administered for GI endoscopic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal Kamal
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Muhammad Ali Khan
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wade Lee-Smith
- Mulford Health Sciences Library, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA
| | - Sachit Sharma
- Department of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA
| | - Zaid Imam
- Division of Gastroenterology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Dawit Jowhar
- Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Collin Henry
- Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Zubair Khan
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ellen Petryna
- Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jay R Patel
- Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Eric A V Qualkenbush
- Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Colin W Howden
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Stasiowski MJ, Starzewska M, Niewiadomska E, Król S, Marczak K, Żak J, Pluta A, Eszyk J, Grabarek BO, Szumera I, Nycz M, Missir A, Krawczyk L, Jałowiecki P. Adequacy of Anesthesia Guidance for Colonoscopy Procedures. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14050464. [PMID: 34069155 PMCID: PMC8157001 DOI: 10.3390/ph14050464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In patients undergoing colonoscopy procedures (CPs), inadequate dosing of hypnotic drugs (HD) and opioid analgesics (OA) during intravenous sedoanalgesia (ISA) may lead to intraprocedural awareness with recall (IAwR), intraprocedural (IPP) and postprocedural pain (PPP), as well as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the titration of HD and OA based on the observance of changing values of state entropy (SE) and surgical pleth index (SPI) (adequacy of anesthesia-AoA), state entropy alone, or standard practice may reduce the number of adverse events. One hundred and fifty-eight patients were included in the final analysis. The rate of IAwR and IPP was statistically more frequent in patients from the C group in comparison with the AoA and SE groups (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). In turn, the rate of PPP, PONV, and patients' and operators' satisfaction with ISA between groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Changes in hemodynamic parameters, demand for HD, and OA were statistically significant, but of no clinical value. In patients undergoing CPs under ISA using propofol and FNT, as compared to standard practice, intraprocedural SE monitoring reduced the rate of IAwR and IPP, with no influence on the rate of PPP, PONV, or patients' and endoscopists' satisfaction. AoA guidance on propofol and FNT titration, as compared to SE monitoring only, did not reduce the occurrence of the aforementioned studied parameters, imposing an unnecessary extra cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michał Jan Stasiowski
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-555 Katowice, Poland; (J.Ż.); (A.P.); (I.S.); (L.K.); (P.J.)
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, 5th Regional Hospital, Medykow Square 1, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland; (S.K.); (K.M.); (A.M.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Małgorzata Starzewska
- Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland;
| | - Ewa Niewiadomska
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School Health Sciences in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia, Piekarska 18 Street, 41-902 Bytom, Poland;
| | - Seweryn Król
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, 5th Regional Hospital, Medykow Square 1, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland; (S.K.); (K.M.); (A.M.)
- Department of General, Colorectal and Polytrauma Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-555 Katowice, Poland;
| | - Kaja Marczak
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, 5th Regional Hospital, Medykow Square 1, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland; (S.K.); (K.M.); (A.M.)
| | - Jakub Żak
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-555 Katowice, Poland; (J.Ż.); (A.P.); (I.S.); (L.K.); (P.J.)
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, 5th Regional Hospital, Medykow Square 1, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland; (S.K.); (K.M.); (A.M.)
| | - Aleksandra Pluta
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-555 Katowice, Poland; (J.Ż.); (A.P.); (I.S.); (L.K.); (P.J.)
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, 5th Regional Hospital, Medykow Square 1, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland; (S.K.); (K.M.); (A.M.)
| | - Jerzy Eszyk
- Unit of Endoscopy by the Department of Gastroenterology, 5th Regional Hospital, Medykow Square 1, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland;
| | - Beniamin Oskar Grabarek
- Department of Histology, Cytophysiology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine in Zabrze, University of Technology in Katowice, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland;
- Department of Nursing and Maternity, High School of Strategic Planning in Dąbrowa Górnicza, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
| | - Izabela Szumera
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-555 Katowice, Poland; (J.Ż.); (A.P.); (I.S.); (L.K.); (P.J.)
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, 5th Regional Hospital, Medykow Square 1, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland; (S.K.); (K.M.); (A.M.)
| | - Michał Nycz
- Department of General, Colorectal and Polytrauma Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-555 Katowice, Poland;
| | - Anna Missir
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, 5th Regional Hospital, Medykow Square 1, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland; (S.K.); (K.M.); (A.M.)
| | - Lech Krawczyk
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-555 Katowice, Poland; (J.Ż.); (A.P.); (I.S.); (L.K.); (P.J.)
| | - Przemysław Jałowiecki
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-555 Katowice, Poland; (J.Ż.); (A.P.); (I.S.); (L.K.); (P.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ates I, Aydin ME, Albayrak B, Disci E, Ahiskalioglu EO, Celik EC, Baran O, Ahiskalioglu A. Pre-procedure intravenous lidocaine administration on propofol consumption for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36:1286-1290. [PMID: 33217031 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedure is generally performed in patients with high comorbidity. We aimed to reduce the consumption of propofol by adding lidocaine before ERCP. METHODS Eighty ERCP patients with ASA I-III, aged between 45-75 years, were randomly divided into two groups. Lidocaine group (group L, n = 40), received 1-mg midazolam, 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine, and 1 mg/kg propofol intravenously. The control group (group C, n = 40) received 1-mg midazolam, saline in the same volume as the lidocaine group, and 1 mg/kg propofol intravenously. Propofol was administered with intermittent bolus doses. Propofol consumption, oropharyngeal reflex, recovery time, endoscopist satisfaction, ketamine need, and side-effects were recorded. RESULTS Propofol consumption during the procedure was statistically lower in group L than in the control group (157.25 ± 39.16 mg vs 228.75 ± 64.62 mg respectively, P < 0.001). Additionally, recovery time was statistically faster in group L compared with the control group (7.78 ± 3.95 min vs 11.92 ± 3.24 min respectively, P < 0.001). The oropharyngeal reflex was less in group L than control group (6/40 vs 15/40 respectively, P = 0.042). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding visual analogue scale scores and endoscopist satisfaction (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS We recommend the use of intravenous lidocaine before the ERCP procedure as it reduces propofol consumption, recovery times, and oropharyngeal reflex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irem Ates
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Muhammed Enes Aydin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.,Clinical Research, Development and Design Application and Research Center, School of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Bulent Albayrak
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Esra Disci
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Elif Oral Ahiskalioglu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Erkan Cem Celik
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.,Clinical Research, Development and Design Application and Research Center, School of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Onur Baran
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Palandoken State Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Ali Ahiskalioglu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.,Clinical Research, Development and Design Application and Research Center, School of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Xie C, Wang Q, Huai D. Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine Can Accelerate Postoperative Early Recovery in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e926990. [PMID: 33529177 PMCID: PMC7870156 DOI: 10.12659/msm.926990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is defined by intermittent and recurrent episodes of partial or complete obstruction of the upper airway during sleep. Intermittent and recurrent hypoxia/reoxygenation is the main pathophysiological mechanism of OSA. Its consequences include systemic inflammation, activation of the sympathetic nervous system, and release of oxygen free radicals. Infusion of intravenous (IV) lidocaine has anti-inflammatory, antihyperalgesic, and analgesic properties, supporting its use as an anesthetic adjuvant. Lidocaine can reduce nociception and/or cardiovascular responses to surgical stress, as well as postoperative pain and/or analgesic requirements. Because of the high prevalence of OSA in obese patients, the use of opioids to manage postoperative pain in that population is often accompanied by the development of adverse respiratory events, such as hypoventilation and hypoxemia. IV infusion of lidocaine has been shown to enhance the quality of early recovery after laparoscopic bariatric and upper airway surgery. However, limited evidence exists regarding its use in patients undergoing surgery for OSA. In addition, whether IV infusion of lidocaine can improve postoperative early recovery in patients undergoing surgery for OSA remains unknown. Therefore, we hypothesized that IV infusion of lidocaine can improve postoperative early recovery in patients undergoing surgery for OSA. Perioperative infusion also may be a promising analgesic adjunct to enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenglan Xie
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Huaian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and Huaian Second People’s Hospital, Huaian, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Qiao Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Huaian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and Huaian Second People’s Hospital, Huaian, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - De Huai
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, The Affiliated Huaian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and Huaian Second People’s Hospital, Huaian, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Liu H, Chen M, Lian C, Wu J, Shangguan W. Effect of intravenous administration of lidocaine on the ED50 of propofol induction dose during gastroscopy in adult patients: A randomized, controlled study. J Clin Pharm Ther 2020; 46:711-716. [PMID: 33351197 DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE Propofol provides a prominent sedation effect in gastroscopy. However, sedation with propofol alone during gastroscopy might result in circulatory and respiratory depression. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the addition of intravenous lidocaine to propofol-based sedation could decrease the ED50 of propofol induction dose during gastroscopy in adult patients while the respiratory and haemodynamic stability were not compromised. METHODS Patients undergoing gastroscopy were randomly enrolled into lidocaine + propofol (L + P) group or normal saline + propofol (NS + P) group. Subjects were initially administered intravenous bolus of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine in L + P group or equivalent volume of 0.9% saline in NS + P group. Anaesthesia was then induced with a single bolus of 1.0 μg sufentanil followed by injection of propofol in all patients. The induction dose of propofol for each individual patient was determined by the protocol of Dixon "up-and-down" method for both groups. The primary end point was the ED50 of propofol induction dose. RESULTS Totally, 48 patients were enrolled and completed this study. Compared with the NS + P group, the ED50 of propofol induction dose was significantly reduced in the L + P group (2.01 mg/kg vs. 1.69 mg/kg) (U = 61.5, p < 0.001). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION The addition of intravenous lidocaine significantly reduced the ED50 of propofol induction dose during gastroscopy in adult patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION The present clinical trial was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn/ (registration No. ChiCTR1900024025, 23 June 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haoran Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Mengmeng Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Chaohui Lian
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Junzheng Wu
- Department of Anesthesia and Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Wangning Shangguan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Procedure-specific and patient-specific pain management for ambulatory surgery with emphasis on the opioid crisis. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2020; 33:753-759. [PMID: 33027075 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000000922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Postoperative pain is frequent while, on the other hand, there is a grooving general concern on using effective opioid pain killers in view of the opioid crisis and significant incidence of opioid abuse. The present review aims at describing nonopioid measures in order to optimize and tailor perioperative pain management in ambulatory surgery. RECENT FINDINGS Postoperative pain should be addressed both preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively. The management should basically be multimodal, nonopioid and procedure-specific. Opioids should only be used when needed on top of multimodal nonopioid prophylaxis, and then limited to a few days at maximum, unless strict control is applied. The individual patient should be screened preoperatively for any risk factors for severe postoperative pain and/or any abuse potential. SUMMARY Basic multimodal analgesia should start preoperatively or peroperatively and include paracetamol, cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 specific inhibitor or conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and in most cases dexamethasone and local anaesthetic wound infiltration. If any of these basic analgesics are contraindicated or there is an extra risk of severe postoperative pain, further measures may be considered: nerve-blocks or interfascial plane blocks, gabapentinnoids, clonidine, intravenous lidocaine infusion or ketamine infusion. In the abuse-prone patient, a preferably nonopioid perioperative approach should be aimed at.
Collapse
|
42
|
Li X, Lv X, Jiang Z, Nie X, Wang X, Li T, Zhang L, Liu S. Application of Intravenous Lidocaine in Obese Patients Undergoing Painless Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study. Drug Des Devel Ther 2020; 14:3509-3518. [PMID: 32943843 PMCID: PMC7468415 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s266062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) for colonoscopy can result in a high prevalence of severe respiratory depression. Studies have shown that intravenous (IV) infusion of lidocaine can reduce propofol requirements significantly and increase the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide in humans. We tested the hypothesis that IV lidocaine could improve propofol-induced respiratory depression in obese patients during colonoscopy. METHODS Ninety obese patients scheduled for painless colonoscopy were randomized to receive lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg, then 2 mg/kg/h, IV) or the same volume of 0.9% saline. Intraoperative sedation was provided by propofol. The primary outcome was the number of oxygen-desaturation episodes. Secondary outcomes were: the number of apnea episodes; total propofol consumption; time to the first hypoxia episode; time to consciousness loss; intraoperative hemodynamic parameters; awakening time; adverse events; duration of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay; satisfaction of endoscopists and patients. RESULTS Demographic characteristics between the two groups were comparable. The number of oxygen-desaturation episodes in group L (1.49±1.12) decreased by 0.622 (P=0.018) compared with that in group N (2.11±1.32), and the number of apnea episodes in group L decreased by 0.533 (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the median time to the first hypoxia episode was longer in group L (86.78 s) than that in group N (63.83 s) (Log rank P=0.0008). The total propofol consumption, awakening time, and duration of PACU stay were reduced in group L. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of adverse events (P>0.05 for all). Satisfaction scores for endoscopists and patients in group L were higher than that in group N (P<0.001). CONCLUSION Intravenous infusion of lidocaine could significantly reduce the number of oxygen-desaturation and apnea episodes in obese patients during painless colonoscopy. This method is worthy of clinical promotion. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION ChiCTR2000028937.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoxiao Li
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xueli Lv
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhenfei Jiang
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xinrui Nie
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xinghe Wang
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tong Li
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lianyi Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Su Liu
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Liu J, Liu X, Peng LP, Ji R, Liu C, Li YQ. Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine in propofol-based sedation for ERCP procedures: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:293-300. [PMID: 32156544 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.02.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Propofol-based sedation is widely used in ERCP procedures, but adverse respiratory or cardiovascular events commonly occur. Intravenous injection of lidocaine has an analgesic effect and can reduce the requirements of fentanyl and propofol during abdominal surgery. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine on propofol requirements during ERCP procedures. METHODS Forty-eight patients scheduled for ERCP were randomly divided into 2 groups, the lidocaine group and the control group. All patients received .02 mg/kg midazolam and .1 μg/kg sufentanil intravenously as premedication. A bolus of propofol was applied for induction of sedation, and perfusion of propofol was applied for maintenance. Patients in the lidocaine group received a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine intravenously followed by continuous infusion of 2 mg/kg/h, whereas the control group received the same volumes of saline solution. The primary outcome was the propofol requirement during ERCP. RESULTS Compared with the control group, propofol requirements were reduced by 33.8% in the lidocaine group (212.0 ± 118.2 mg vs 320.0 ± 189.6 mg, P = .023). Involuntary movement was less common in the lidocaine group than in the control group (12.5% vs 41.7%, P = .049). In the lidocaine group, postprocedure pain and fatigue, as measured by the visual analog scale, were significantly reduced (0 [range, 0-4] vs 3 [range, 0-5], P = .005; 2 [range, 0-4] vs 5 [range, 2-8], P < .001).The incidence of oxygen desaturation, hypotension, and bradycardia tended to be lower in the lidocaine group. CONCLUSIONS Intravenous lidocaine can significantly decrease propofol requirements during ERCP, with higher sedation quality and endoscopist satisfaction. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03996577.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China; Department of Anesthesiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaoping Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Li-Ping Peng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Rui Ji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Chao Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Yan-Qing Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China; Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China; Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI Tumor, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Adamsen S, Vargo JJ. Propofol and lidocaine for ERCP: Two is better than one? Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:308-309. [PMID: 32703365 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Adamsen
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John J Vargo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
|
46
|
Chen M, Lu Y, Liu H, Fu Q, Li J, Wu J, Shangguan W. The propofol-sparing effect of intravenous lidocaine in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol 2020; 20:132. [PMID: 32473649 PMCID: PMC7260845 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-020-01049-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Propofol provides a prominent sedation effect in colonoscopy. However, anesthesia and sedation induced with propofol in the elderly might result in cardiopulmonary complications, especially when it is combined with opoids in the regimen. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the addition of intravenous lidocaine to propofol-based sedation could decrease the overall propofol requirement in elderly patients during colonoscopy while the procedural sedation satisfaction and the hemodynamic stability were not compromised. Methods Ninety-two patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomly enrolled into lidocaine+propofol (L + P) group or normal saline+propofol (NS + P) groups. Subjects received intravenous bolus of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine followed by 4 mg kg− 1 h− 1 lidocaine continuous infusion in L + P group or equivalent volumes of normal saline for boluses and infusion in NS + P group. Anesthesia was induced with 2.5 μg sufentanil followed by injection of 1.2 mg kg− 1 propofol in all patients. A single supplemental bolus of 0.6 mg kg− 1 propofol was administered whenever MOAA/S score > 1 or had body movement during the colonoscopy. The recorded primary endpoints included: the total amount of propofol administered during entire procedure, the supplemental amount of propofol after induction, and the frequencies of boluses of supplemental propofol. Results A total of 79 patients were included in the final analysis. Compared with NS + P group, the total amounts of propofol (induction plus supplemental) were no significant differences in L + P group; however, the required supplemental propofol was less (69.9 ± 39.2 mg vs. 51.5 ± 38.6 mg) (P = 0.039); the average frequencies of boluses of supplemental propofol given after induction were lower (2.1 ± 1.1 vs. 1.4 ± 0.9) (P = 0.003); the calculated “unit propofol” infusion rate was lower (0.18 ± 0.05 vs. 0.14 ± 0.04 mg kg− 1 min− 1) (P = 0.002). Conclusions The addition of intravenous lidocaine to propofol-based sedation resulted in a remarked reduction of supplemental propofol in the elderly during colonoscopy. Trial registration The present clinical trial was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn on 11th March 2019 (registration No. ChiCTR1900021818).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengmeng Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 109 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, China
| | - Yi Lu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 109 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, China
| | - Haoran Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 109 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, China
| | - Qingxia Fu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 109 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, China
| | - Jun Li
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 109 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, China
| | - Junzheng Wu
- Department of Anesthesia and Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Wangning Shangguan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 109 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, China.
| |
Collapse
|