1
|
Tran R, Pedersen K, Kolawole H, Roessler P, Scolaro R. Australian and New Zealand Anaesthetic Allergy Group/Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists perioperative anaphylaxis management guideline 2022. Anaesth Intensive Care 2024; 52:147-158. [PMID: 38587791 DOI: 10.1177/0310057x231215823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
Perioperative anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening emergency that requires prompt recognition and institution of life-saving therapy. The Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and Australian and New Zealand Anaesthetic Allergy Group have partnered to develop the anaphylaxis management guideline along with crisis management cards that are recommended for use in suspected anaphylaxis in the perioperative setting. This is the third version of these guidelines with the second version having been published in 2016. This article contains the revised Australian and New Zealand Anaesthetic Allergy Group/Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists perioperative anaphylaxis management guideline, with a brief review of the current evidence for the management of anaphylaxis in the perioperative environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Tran
- Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - Karen Pedersen
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Te Toka Tumai, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Helen Kolawole
- Department of Anaesthesia, Peninsula Health, Victoria, Australia
- Anaesthesia Teaching and Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter Roessler
- Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, Melbourne Victoria, Australia
| | - Richard Scolaro
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qureshi T, Hutton P, Pandit JJ. Sharpening PUMA's teeth: improving guidance for capnography to confirm tracheal intubation in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Anaesthesia 2023; 78:937-942. [PMID: 36947864 DOI: 10.1111/anae.16002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- T Qureshi
- Nuffield Department of Anaesthesia, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - P Hutton
- University of Birmingham, UK
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (Heart, Lung and Critical Care Clinical Group), London, UK
| | - J J Pandit
- Nuffield Department of Anaesthesia, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- University of Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gilbey T. Pro: We Should Routinely Intubate All Patients in Cardiac Arrest. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2023:S1053-0770(23)00056-3. [PMID: 36868906 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Gilbey
- Anaesthetic Registrar, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Russotto V, Rahmani LS, Parotto M, Bellani G, Laffey JG. Tracheal intubation in the critically ill patient. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2022; 39:463-472. [PMID: 34799497 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Tracheal intubation is among the most commonly performed and high-risk procedures in critical care. Indeed, 45% of patients undergoing intubation experience at least one major peri-intubation adverse event, with cardiovascular instability being the most common event reported in 43%, followed by severe hypoxemia in 9% and cardiac arrest in 3% of cases. These peri-intubation adverse events may expose patients to a higher risk of 28-day mortality, and they are more frequently observed with an increasing number of attempts to secure the airway. The higher risk of peri-intubation complications in critically ill patients, compared with the anaesthesia setting, is the consequence of their deranged physiology (e.g. underlying respiratory failure, shock and/or acidosis) and, in this regard, airway management in critical care has been defined as "physiologically difficult". In recent years, several randomised studies have investigated the most effective preoxy-genation strategies, and evidence for the use of positive pressure ventilation in moderate-to-severe hypoxemic patients is established. On the other hand, evidence on interventions to mitigate haemodynamic collapse after intubation has been elusive. Airway management in COVID-19 patients is even more challenging because of the additional risk of infection for healthcare workers, which has influenced clinical choices in this patient group. The aim of this review is to provide an update of the evidence for intubation in critically ill patients with a focus on understanding peri-intubation risks and evaluating interventions to prevent or mitigate adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Russotto
- From the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital San Luigi Gonzaga, University of Turin, Italy (VR), Department of Emergency and Intensive Care, University Hospital San Gerardo, Monza (GB), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy (GB), Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Children's Health Ireland at Temple Street, Dublin, Ireland (LSR), Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine; Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto (MP), Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada (MP), Regenerative Medicine Institute at CURAM Centre for Medical Devices, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland (JGL) and Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland (JGL) Correspondence to Vincenzo Russotto, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital San Luigi Gonzaga, Regione Gonzole, 10, 10043 Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 4:CD011136. [PMID: 35373840 PMCID: PMC8978307 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011136.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tracheal intubation is a common procedure performed to secure the airway in adults undergoing surgery or those who are critically ill. Intubation is sometimes associated with difficulties and complications that may result in patient harm. While it is traditionally achieved by performing direct laryngoscopy, the past three decades have seen the advent of rigid indirect videolaryngoscopes (VLs). A mounting body of evidence comparing the two approaches to tracheal intubation has been acquired over this period of time. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2016. OBJECTIVES To assess whether use of different designs of VLs in adults requiring tracheal intubation reduces the failure rate compared with direct laryngoscopy, and assess the benefits and risks of these devices in selected population groups, users and settings. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and Web of Science on 27 February 2021. We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings and conducted forward and backward citation searches. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs with adults undergoing laryngoscopy performed with either a VL or a Macintosh direct laryngoscope (DL) in any clinical setting. We included parallel and cross-over study designs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We collected data for the following outcomes: failed intubation, hypoxaemia, successful first attempt at tracheal intubation, oesophageal intubation, dental trauma, Cormack-Lehane grade, and time for tracheal intubation. MAIN RESULTS We included 222 studies (219 RCTs, three quasi-RCTs) with 26,149 participants undergoing tracheal intubation. Most studies recruited adults undergoing elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation. Twenty-one studies recruited participants with a known or predicted difficult airway, and an additional 25 studies simulated a difficult airway. Twenty-one studies were conducted outside the operating theatre environment; of these, six were in the prehospital setting, seven in the emergency department and eight in the intensive care unit. We report here the findings of the three main comparisons according to videolaryngoscopy device type. We downgraded the certainty of the outcomes for imprecision, study limitations (e.g. high or unclear risks of bias), inconsistency when we noted substantial levels of statistical heterogeneity and publication bias. Macintosh-style videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy (61 studies, 9883 participants) We found moderate-certainty evidence that a Macintosh-style VL probably reduces rates of failed intubation (risk ratio (RR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 0.65; 41 studies, 4615 participants) and hypoxaemia (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.99; 16 studies, 2127 participants). These devices may also increase rates of success on the first intubation attempt (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.09; 42 studies, 7311 participants; low-certainty evidence) and probably improve glottic view when assessed as Cormack-Lehane grade 3 and 4 (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.48; 38 studies, 4368 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We found little or no clear difference in rates of oesophageal intubation (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.21; 14 studies, 2404 participants) but this finding was supported by low-certainty evidence. We were unsure of the findings for dental trauma because the certainty of this evidence was very low (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.16 to 2.89; 18 studies, 2297 participants). We were not able to pool data for time required for tracheal intubation owing to considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 96%). Hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy (96 studies, 11,438 participants) We found moderate-certainty evidence that hyperangulated VLs probably reduce rates of failed intubation (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.76; 63 studies, 7146 participants) and oesophageal intubation (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.81; 14 studies, 1968 participants). In subgroup analysis, we noted that hyperangulated VLs were more likely to reduce failed intubation when used on known or predicted difficult airways (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.48; P = 0.03 for subgroup differences; 15 studies, 1520 participants). We also found that these devices may increase rates of success on the first intubation attempt (RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.05; 66 studies, 8086 participants; low-certainty evidence) and the glottic view is probably also improved (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.24; 54 studies, 6058 participants; data for Cormack-Lehane grade 3/4 views; moderate-certainty evidence). However, we found low-certainty evidence of little or no clear difference in rates of hypoxaemia (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.11; 15 studies, 1691 participants), and the findings for dental trauma were unclear because the certainty of this evidence was very low (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.59; 30 studies, 3497 participants). We were not able to pool data for time required for tracheal intubation owing to considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 99%). Channelled videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy (73 studies, 7165 participants) We found moderate-certainty evidence that channelled VLs probably reduce rates of failed intubation (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.61; 53 studies, 5367 participants) and hypoxaemia (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.50; 15 studies, 1966 participants). They may also increase rates of success on the first intubation attempt (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.15; 47 studies, 5210 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and probably improve glottic view (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.21; 40 studies, 3955 participants; data for Cormack-Lehane grade 3/4 views; moderate-certainty evidence). We found little or no clear difference in rates of oesophageal intubation (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.75; 16 studies, 1756 participants) but this was supported by low-certainty evidence. We were unsure of the findings for dental trauma because the certainty of the evidence was very low (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.12; 29 studies, 2375 participants). We were not able to pool data for time required for tracheal intubation owing to considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 98%). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS VLs of all designs likely reduce rates of failed intubation and result in higher rates of successful intubation on the first attempt with improved glottic views. Macintosh-style and channelled VLs likely reduce rates of hypoxaemic events, while hyperangulated VLs probably reduce rates of oesophageal intubation. We conclude that videolaryngoscopy likely provides a safer risk profile compared to direct laryngoscopy for all adults undergoing tracheal intubation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew M Rogers
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Trust, Bath, UK
| | - Sharon R Lewis
- Bone and Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Tim M Cook
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Trust, Bath, UK
- University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Andrew F Smith
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, UK
- Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Higgs A, Tham SM. Attenuated post intubation capnograph trace: Haemodynamic collapse or technical error? TRENDS IN ANAESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tacc.2022.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
7
|
Pandit JJ, Young P, Davies M. Why does oesophageal intubation still go unrecognised? Lessons for prevention from the coroner's court. Anaesthesia 2021; 77:123-128. [PMID: 34855200 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J J Pandit
- Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.,University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - P Young
- Department of Anaesthesia, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kings Lynn, UK
| | - M Davies
- Department of Anaesthesia, Peterborough City Hospital, Peterborough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Russotto V, Cook TM. Capnography use in the critical care setting: why do clinicians fail to implement this safety measure? Br J Anaesth 2021; 127:661-664. [PMID: 34503831 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Tracheal intubation is among the most frequently performed manoeuvres in the critical care setting, and can be life-saving in critical illness, though also associated with serious adverse events such as oesophageal intubation or tracheal tube obstruction, displacement, or disconnection from the ventilator. A key finding of the 4th National Audit Project (NAP4) was identification of waveform capnography as the single intervention with the highest potential for reducing morbidity and mortality during tracheal intubation and maintenance of an artificial airway. In the INTUBE study, penetration of capnography into ICUs was low, and was not in use in 70% of the episodes of oesophageal intubation. To reduce harm and avoidable death, there is a need for a global initiative to increase access to and use of capnography in ICUs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Russotto
- Department of Emergency and Intensive Care, University Hospital San Gerardo, Monza, Italy.
| | - Tim M Cook
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK; School of Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pandit JJ. 'No trace, wrong place' does not mean 'positive trace, right place'. Identifying and managing misplaced or displaced tracheal tubes in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Anaesthesia 2021; 77:16-21. [PMID: 34121176 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J J Pandit
- Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.,University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Soar J, Böttiger BW, Carli P, Couper K, Deakin CD, Djärv T, Lott C, Olasveengen T, Paal P, Pellis T, Perkins GD, Sandroni C, Nolan JP. [Adult advanced life support]. Notf Rett Med 2021; 24:406-446. [PMID: 34121923 PMCID: PMC8185697 DOI: 10.1007/s10049-021-00893-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
These European Resuscitation Council Advanced Life Support guidelines are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. This section provides guidelines on the prevention of and ALS treatments for both in-hospital cardiac arrest and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmeet Soar
- Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, Großbritannien
| | - Bernd W. Böttiger
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Pierre Carli
- SAMU de Paris, Center Hospitalier Universitaire Necker Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, Frankreich
| | - Keith Couper
- Critical Care Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Großbritannien
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, Großbritannien
| | - Charles D. Deakin
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Großbritannien
- South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Otterbourne, Großbritannien
| | - Therese Djärv
- Dept of Acute and Reparative Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Schweden
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Schweden
| | - Carsten Lott
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Theresa Olasveengen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norwegen
| | - Peter Paal
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hospitallers Brothers Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Österreich
| | - Tommaso Pellis
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Sanitaria Friuli Occidentale, Pordenone, Italien
| | - Gavin D. Perkins
- Warwick Medical School and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University of Warwick, Coventry, Großbritannien
| | - Claudio Sandroni
- Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rom, Italien
- Institute of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rom, Italien
| | - Jerry P. Nolan
- Warwick Medical School, Coventry, Großbritannien, Consultant in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Royal United Hospital, University of Warwick, Bath, Großbritannien
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Soar J, Böttiger BW, Carli P, Couper K, Deakin CD, Djärv T, Lott C, Olasveengen T, Paal P, Pellis T, Perkins GD, Sandroni C, Nolan JP. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 2021; 161:115-151. [PMID: 33773825 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 433] [Impact Index Per Article: 144.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
These European Resuscitation Council Advanced Life Support guidelines, are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. This section provides guidelines on the prevention of and ALS treatments for both in-hospital cardiac arrest and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmeet Soar
- Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
| | - Bernd W Böttiger
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Pierre Carli
- SAMU de Paris, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Necker Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Keith Couper
- Critical Care Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry,UK
| | - Charles D Deakin
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Otterbourne,UK
| | - Therese Djärv
- Dept of Acute and Reparative Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet,Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Carsten Lott
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz, Germany
| | - Theresa Olasveengen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Peter Paal
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hospitallers Brothers Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Tommaso Pellis
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Sanitaria Friuli Occidentale, Italy
| | - Gavin D Perkins
- University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Claudio Sandroni
- Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Institute of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Jerry P Nolan
- University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, CV4 7AL; Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Law JA, Duggan LV, Asselin M, Baker P, Crosby E, Downey A, Hung OR, Jones PM, Lemay F, Noppens R, Parotto M, Preston R, Sowers N, Sparrow K, Turkstra TP, Wong DT, Kovacs G. Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 1. Difficult airway management encountered in an unconscious patient. Can J Anaesth 2021; 68:1373-1404. [PMID: 34143394 PMCID: PMC8212585 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-021-02007-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Since the last Canadian Airway Focus Group (CAFG) guidelines were published in 2013, the literature on airway management has expanded substantially. The CAFG therefore re-convened to examine this literature and update practice recommendations. This first of two articles addresses difficulty encountered with airway management in an unconscious patient. SOURCE Canadian Airway Focus Group members, including anesthesia, emergency medicine, and critical care physicians, were assigned topics to search. Searches were run in the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL databases. Results were presented to the group and discussed during video conferences every two weeks from April 2018 to July 2020. These CAFG recommendations are based on the best available published evidence. Where high-quality evidence was lacking, statements are based on group consensus. FINDINGS AND KEY RECOMMENDATIONS Most studies comparing video laryngoscopy (VL) with direct laryngoscopy indicate a higher first attempt and overall success rate with VL, and lower complication rates. Thus, resources allowing, the CAFG now recommends use of VL with appropriately selected blade type to facilitate all tracheal intubations. If a first attempt at tracheal intubation or supraglottic airway (SGA) placement is unsuccessful, further attempts can be made as long as patient ventilation and oxygenation is maintained. Nevertheless, total attempts should be limited (to three or fewer) before declaring failure and pausing to consider "exit strategy" options. For failed intubation, exit strategy options in the still-oxygenated patient include awakening (if feasible), temporizing with an SGA, a single further attempt at tracheal intubation using a different technique, or front-of-neck airway access (FONA). Failure of tracheal intubation, face-mask ventilation, and SGA ventilation together with current or imminent hypoxemia defines a "cannot ventilate, cannot oxygenate" emergency. Neuromuscular blockade should be confirmed or established, and a single final attempt at face-mask ventilation, SGA placement, or tracheal intubation with hyper-angulated blade VL can be made, if it had not already been attempted. If ventilation remains impossible, emergency FONA should occur without delay using a scalpel-bougie-tube technique (in the adult patient). The CAFG recommends all institutions designate an individual as "airway lead" to help institute difficult airway protocols, ensure adequate training and equipment, and help with airway-related quality reviews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Adam Law
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax Infirmary Site, 1796 Summer Street, Room 5452, Halifax, NS B3H 3A7 Canada
| | - Laura V. Duggan
- grid.28046.380000 0001 2182 2255Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Civic Campus, University of Ottawa, Room B307, 1053 Carling Avenue, Mail Stop 249, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9 Canada
| | - Mathieu Asselin
- grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Département d’anesthésiologie et de soins intensifs, Université Laval, 2325 rue de l’Université, Québec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada ,grid.411081.d0000 0000 9471 1794Département d’anesthésie du CHU de Québec, Hôpital Enfant-Jésus, 1401 18e rue, Québec, QC G1J 1Z4 Canada
| | - Paul Baker
- grid.9654.e0000 0004 0372 3343Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142 New Zealand
| | - Edward Crosby
- grid.28046.380000 0001 2182 2255Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Suite CCW1401, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6 Canada
| | - Andrew Downey
- grid.1055.10000000403978434Department of Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Orlando R. Hung
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, 1796 Summer Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3A7 Canada
| | - Philip M. Jones
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, LHSC- University Hospital, 339 Windermere Rd., London, ON N6A 5A5 Canada
| | - François Lemay
- grid.417661.30000 0001 2190 0479Département d’anesthésiologie, CHU de Québec – Université Laval, Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, 11, Côte du Palais, Québec, QC G1R 2J6 Canada
| | - Rudiger Noppens
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, LHSC- University Hospital, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON N6A 5A5 Canada
| | - Matteo Parotto
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, EN 442 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4 Canada
| | - Roanne Preston
- grid.413264.60000 0000 9878 6515Department of Anesthesia, BC Women’s Hospital, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1 Canada
| | - Nick Sowers
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Department of Emergency Medicine, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, 1796 Summer Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3A7 Canada
| | - Kathryn Sparrow
- grid.25055.370000 0000 9130 6822Discipline of Anesthesia, St. Clare’s Mercy Hospital, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John’s, NL A1B V6 Canada
| | - Timothy P. Turkstra
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, LHSC- University Hospital, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON N6A 5A5 Canada
| | - David T. Wong
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Anesthesia, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399, Bathurst St, Toronto, ON M5T2S8 Canada
| | - George Kovacs
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Department of Emergency Medicine, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, 1796 Summer Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3A7 Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
van Schuppen H, Boomars R, Kooij FO, den Tex P, Koster RW, Hollmann MW. Optimizing airway management and ventilation during prehospital advanced life support in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A narrative review. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2020; 35:67-82. [PMID: 33742579 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Airway management and ventilation are essential components of cardiopulmonary resuscitation to achieve oxygen delivery in order to prevent hypoxic injury and increase the chance of survival. Weighing the relative benefits and downsides, the best approach is a staged strategy; start with a focus on high-quality chest compressions and defibrillation, then optimize mask ventilation while preparing for advanced airway management with a supraglottic airway device. Endotracheal intubation can still be indicated, but has the largest downsides of all advanced airway techniques. Whichever stage of airway management, ventilation and chest compression quality should be closely monitored. Capnography has many advantages and should be used routinely. Optimizing ventilation strategies, harmonizing ventilation with mechanical chest compression devices, and implementation in complex and stressful environments are challenges we need to face through collaborative innovation, research, and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans van Schuppen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Anesthesiology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - René Boomars
- Regional Ambulance Service Utrecht (RAVU), Jan van Eijcklaan 6, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Fabian O Kooij
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Anesthesiology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Helicopter Mobile Medical Team (MMT), De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul den Tex
- University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rudolph W Koster
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Resuscitation Studies (ARREST), Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Markus W Hollmann
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Anesthesiology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Smith C, McNarry AF. Airway Leads and Airway Response Teams: Improving Delivery of Safer Airway Management? CURRENT ANESTHESIOLOGY REPORTS 2020; 10:370-377. [PMID: 32837344 PMCID: PMC7369438 DOI: 10.1007/s40140-020-00404-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Airway management remains a source of significant morbidity and mortality. This review considers recent summaries of complications and looks toward strategies to improve practice using a coordinated approach. Recent Findings A safety gap can exist between national recommendations and local practice. A lack of attention to end tidal carbon dioxide has repeatedly contributed to airway mismanagement. Clinicians must be trained in newer airway devices (videolaryngoscopes or supraglottic airways) to use them effectively. Time must be found to teach rarely performed skills (e.g., front-of-neck access). Both larger and smaller hospitals have benefitted from an airway lead or response team, coordinating education programs, ensuring the adoption of guidelines, standardizing equipment, and recognizing the role of human factors and ergonomics. Summary Even in the twenty-first century, the incidence of airway-related morbidity and mortality can be reduced, by an institutionally supported, coordinated approach to the whole process of airway care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Smith
- South East Scotland School of Anaesthesia, St John's Hospital, Livingston, EH54 6PP UK
| | - Alistair F McNarry
- Department of Anaesthesia, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
McNarry AF, M Cook T, Baker PA, O'Sullivan EP. The Airway Lead: opportunities to improve institutional and personal preparedness for airway management. Br J Anaesth 2020; 125:e22-e24. [PMID: 32386835 PMCID: PMC7183994 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Paul A Baker
- Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Misra S, Behera BK, Mohanty MK, Sahoo SK. Diagnosis of inadvertent oesophageal intubation with H-type tracheo-oesophageal fistula. Br J Anaesth 2019; 122:e70-e71. [PMID: 30857614 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2018] [Revised: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
|