A randomised double-blind dose–response study of weight-adjusted infusions of norepinephrine for preventing hypotension during combined spinal–epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery

Intravenous initial bolus during prophylactic norepinephrine infusion to prevent spinal hypotension for cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled, dose-finding trial

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that a 0.05 μg/kg/min of norepinephrine infusion in combination with an initial bolus reduces the incidence of spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery. The initial norepinephrine bolus influences the incidence of spinal hypotension during continuous norepinephrine infusion; however, the ideal initial bolus dose for 0.05 μg/kg/min of continuous infusion remains unknown.

METHODS

This randomized, controlled, dose-finding study randomly allocated 120 parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery to receive initial bolus doses of 0, 0.05, 0.10, and 0.15 μg/kg of norepinephrine, followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 0.05 μg/kg/min. The primary outcome was the dose-response relationship of the initial norepinephrine bolus in preventing the incidence of spinal hypotension. Spinal hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased to <80% of the baseline value or to an absolute value of <90 mmHg from intrathecal injection to delivery, and severe spinal hypotension was defined as SBP decreased to <60% of the baseline value. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of nausea and/or vomiting, hypertension, and bradycardia, as well as the Apgar scores and results of the umbilical arterial blood gas analysis. The effective dose (ED) 90 and ED95 were estimated using probit regression.

RESULTS

The per-protocol analysis included 117 patients. The incidence of spinal hypotension varied significantly among the groups: Group 0 (51.7%), Group 0.05 (44.8%), Group 0.10 (23.3%), and Group 0.15 (6.9%). The ED90 and ED95 values were 0.150 μg/kg (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.114-0.241 μg/kg) and 0.187 μg/kg (95% CI, 0.141-0.313 μg/kg), respectively. However, the ED95 value fell outside the dose range examined in this study. The incidence of severe spinal hypotension differed significantly (P = 0.02) among Groups 0 (17.2%), 0.05 (10.3%), 0.10 (3.3%), and 0.15 (0.0%); however, the incidence of hypertension and bradycardia did not. The incidence of nausea and/or vomiting decreased with an increase in the initial bolus dose (P = 0.03). The fetal outcomes were comparable among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

An initial bolus of 0.150 μg/kg of norepinephrine may be the optimal dose for preventing spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery with a continuous infusion rate of 0.05 μg/kg/min, and does not significantly increase the incidence of hypertension but substantially reduces the risk of nausea and/or vomiting.

Norepinephrine or phenylephrine for the prevention of post-spinal hypotension after caesarean section: A double-blinded, randomized, controlled study of fetal heart rate and fetal cardiac output

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Spinal anesthesia often causes hypotension, with consequent risk to the fetus. The use of vasopressor agents has been highly recommended for the prevention of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during caesarean delivery. Many studies have shown that norepinephrine can provide more stable maternal hemodynamics than phenylephrine. We therefore tested the hypothesis that norepinephrine preserves fetal circulation better than phenylephrine when used to treat maternal hypotension consequent to spinal anesthesia.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.

SETTING

Operating room.

PATIENTS

We recruited 223 parturients with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies who were scheduled for elective caesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients received prophylactic intravenous infusion of either 0.08 μg/kg/min norepinephrine or 0.5 μg/kg/min phenylephrine for prevention of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension.

MEASUREMENTS

Changes in fetal heart rate and fetal cardiac output before and after spinal anesthesia were measured using noninvasive Doppler ultrasound.

MAIN RESULTS

90 subjects who received norepinephrine infusion and 93 subjects who received phenylephrine infusion were ultimately analyzed in the present study. The effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on the change of fetal heart rate and fetal cardiac output at 3 and 6 min after spinal block were similar. Although there was a statistically significant decrease in fetal cardiac output at 6 min after subarachnoid block initiation in both the norepinephrine group (mean difference 0.02 L/min; 95% CI, 0-0.04 L/min; P = 0.03) and the phenylephrine group (mean difference 0.02 L/min; 95% CI, 0-0.04 L/min; P = 0.02), it remained within the normal range.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic infusion of comparable doses of phenylephrine or norepinephrine has similar effects on fetal heart rate and cardiac output changes after spinal anesthesia. Neither phenylephrine nor norepinephrine has meaningful detrimental effects on fetal circulation or neonatal outcomes.

Dose-Response Study of Norepinephrine Infusion for Maternal Hypotension in Preeclamptic Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Spinal anesthesia remains the preferred mode of anesthesia for preeclamptic patients during cesarean delivery. We investigated the incidence of maternal hypotension under spinal anesthesia during cesarean delivery, by comparing different prophylactic infusion rates of norepinephrine with normal saline.

METHODS

We randomly allocated 180 preeclamptic patients (45 in each groups) aged 18-45 scheduled for cesarean delivery to receive one of four prophylactic norepinephrine infusions at doses of 0 (normal saline group), 0.025 (0.025 group), 0.05 (0.05 group), or 0.075 (0.075 group) µg/kg/min following spinal anesthesia. The primary endpoint was the incidence of maternal hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 80% of baseline).

RESULTS

The incidence of maternal hypotension was reduced with different prophylactic infusion rates of norepinephrine (26.7%, 15.6%, and 6.7%) compared with normal saline (37.8%) with a significant decreasing trend (p = 0.002). As the infusion doses of norepinephrine increased, there is a significant decreasing trend in deviation of systolic blood pressure control (median performance error; median absolute performance error) from baseline (p < 0.001; p < 0.001) and need for rescue norepinephrine boluses (p = 0.020). The effective dose 50 and effective dose 90 of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion were - 0.018 (95% confidence interval - 0.074, 0.002) µg/kg/min and 0.065 (95% confidence interval 0.048, 0.108) µg/kg/min, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic infusion of norepinephrine, as compared to no preventive measures, can effectively reduce the incidence of maternal hypotension in preeclamptic patients under spinal anesthesia during cesarean delivery, without increasing other adverse events for either the mother or neonate.

REGISTRATION

Clinical trials.gov identifier number NCT04556370.

Prophylactic norepinephrine combined with 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) co-load infusion for preventing postspinal anesthesia hypotension during cesarean section: a randomized, controlled, dose-finding trial

PURPOSE

Colloid and/or co-load may be more effective than crystalloid for preventing postspinal anesthesia hypotension. We tested five different prophylactic norepinephrine dosages combined with colloid co-load infusion in patients receiving cesarean section and spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

Patients were randomly allocated to receive different prophylactic norepinephrine dosages (0 [NE 0 group], 0.025 [NE 25 group], 0.05 [NE 50 group], 0.075 [NE 75 group], or 0.1 [NE 100 group] µg/kg/min) combined with 500 mL 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) immediately following spinal anesthesia (n = 35 per group). The primary endpoint was the incidence of postspinal anesthesia hypotension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] < 80% of baseline). Secondary endpoints included severe hypotension, bradycardia, nausea or vomiting, hypertension, SBP stability control versus baseline, the 50% (effective dose, ED50) and 90% (ED90) dose effective for preventing postspinal anesthesia hypotension, Apgar scores, and umbilical cord blood gases.

RESULTS

The incidence of postspinal anesthesia hypotension was 48.6%, 31.3%, 17.1%, 14.3%, and 5.7% in the respective groups. As the prophylactic norepinephrine dosage increased, the incidence of postspinal anesthesia hypotension declined (p < 0.001), and SBP remained stable relative to baseline (median performance error [MDPE], p < 0.001; median absolute performance error [MDAPE], p = 0.001). The ED50 and ED90 values were -0.006 (95% CI -0.046-0.013) and 0.081 (95% CI 0.063-0.119) µg/kg/min. Other endpoints were comparable across the groups.

CONCLUSION

An initial prophylactic norepinephrine dosage of 0.05 µg/kg/min combined with 500 mL 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) co-load infusion was optimal for preventing postspinal anesthesia hypotension during cesarean section.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05133817, registration date: 12 Nov, 2021.

Use of vasopressors to manage spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during cesarean delivery

Cesarean sections are commonly performed under spinal anesthesia, which can lead to hypotension, adversely affecting maternal and fetal outcomes. Hypotension following spinal anesthesia is generally defined as a blood pressure of 80-90% below the baseline value. Various strategies have been implemented to reduce the incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. The administration of vasopressors is a crucial method for preventing and treating hypotension. In the past decade, phenylephrine, a primarily alpha-adrenergic agonist, has been the preferred vasopressor for cesarean sections. Recently, norepinephrine, a potent alpha-agonist with modest beta-agonist activity, has gained popularity owing to its advantages over phenylephrine. Vasopressors can be administered via a bolus or continuous infusion. Although administering boluses alone is simpler in a clinical setting, continuous prophylactic infusion initiated immediately after spinal anesthesia is more effective in reducing the incidence of hypotension. Tailoring the infusion dose based on the patient's body weight and adjusting the rate in response to blood pressure changes, in addition to using a prophylactic or rescue bolus, helps reduce blood pressure variability during cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia until neonatal delivery.

Comparative dose-response study on the infusion of norepinephrine combined with intravenous ondansetron versus placebo for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Ondansetron has been reported to attenuate the incidence of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH) and norepinephrine requirement during caesarean section. However, no quantitative study has evaluated the extent of this effect. This study aimed to determine the dose-response of prophylactic infusion of norepinephrine to prevent SAIH in parturients who received intravenous ondansetron or placebo before spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. The median effective dose (ED 50 ) and 90% effective dose (ED 90 ) were compared to evaluate the effect of ondansetron versus placebo on the norepinephrine requirement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty parturients undergoing caesarean section were randomized to receive either 0.1 mg/kg ondansetron (group O) or saline control (group C) 10 min before spinal anaesthesia. The parturients were randomly assigned to one of five different norepinephrine infusion groups: 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08 or 0.10 µg/kg/min. An effective infusion dose of norepinephrine was defined as non-occurrence of hypotension during the study period. The values for ED 50 and ED 90 of norepinephrine infusion were determined using probit regression. Differences between the two groups were evaluated by comparing the relative median potency with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

The ED 50 values were 0.033 (95% CIs, 0.024-0.043) µg/kg/min in group C and 0.021 (95% CIs, 0.013-0.029) µg/kg/min in group O. The ED 90 values were 0.091 (95% CIs 0.068-0.147) µg/kg/min in group C and 0.059 (95% CIs 0.044-0.089) µg/kg/min in group O, respectively. The estimate of the relative median potency for norepinephrine in group C versus group O was 0.643 (95% CIs, 0.363-0.956). The incidence of side effects was comparable between groups. No significant difference in neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous ondansetron 0.1 mg/kg before spinal anaesthesia significantly reduced the dose requirement of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion in parturients undergoing elective caesarean section. This finding is potentially useful for clinical practice and further research.

Predicting fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing parturients undergoing caesarean section via carotid artery blood flow and velocity time integral measured by carotid ultrasound: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Present evidence suggests that the Doppler ultrasonographic indices, such as carotid artery blood flow (CABF) and velocity time integral (VTI), had the ability to predict fluid responsiveness in non-obstetric patients. The purpose of this study was to assess their capacity to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneous breathing parturients undergoing caesarean section and to determine the effect of detecting and management of hypovolemia (fluid responsiveness) on the incidence of hypotension after anaesthesia.

METHODS

A total of 72 full term singleton parturients undergoing elective caesarean section were enrolled in this study. CABF, VTI, and hemodynamic parameters were recorded before and after fluid challenge and assessed by carotid artery ultrasonography. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in stroke volume index (SVI) of 15% or more after the fluid challenge.

RESULTS

Thirty-one (43%) patients were fluid responders. The area under the ROC curve to predict fluid responsiveness for CABF and VTI were 0.803 (95% CI, 0.701-0.905) and 0.821 (95% CI, 0.720-0.922). The optimal cut-off values of CABF and VTI for fluid responsiveness was 175.9 ml/min (sensitivity of 74.0%; specificity of 78.0%) and 8.7 cm/s (sensitivity of 67.0%; specificity of 90.0%). The grey zone for CABF and VTI were 114.2-175.9 ml/min and 6.8-8.7 cm/s. The incidence of hypotension after the combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia (CSEA) was significantly higher in the Responders group 25.8% (8/31) than in the Non-Responders group 17.1(7/41) (P < 0.001). The total incidence of hypotension after CSEA of the two groups was 20.8% (15/72).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound evaluation of CABF and VTI seem to be the feasible parameters to predict fluid responsiveness in parturients undergoing elective caesarean section and detecting and management of hypovolemia (fluid responsiveness) could significantly decrease incidence of hypotension after anaesthesia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) ( www.chictr.org ), registration number was ChiCTR1900022327 (The website link: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=37271 ) and the date of trial registration was in April 5, 2019. This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (20,180,120).

Prophylactic infusion of norepinephrine does not affect the rostral spread of spinal anesthesia in pregnancy: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study

Background: The infusion of phenylephrine to prevent spinal-induced hypotension (SIH) in cesarean delivery may decrease the rostral spread of a spinal local anesthetic. We hypothesized that infusion of norepinephrine may decrease the rostral spread of spinal anesthesia, similar to that caused by phenylephrine. The aim of this study was to compare the block height of spinal anesthesia in the presence or absence of norepinephrine infusion administered to prevent SIH during cesarean delivery. Methods: Eighty patients were enrolled and allocated into groups receiving a norepinephrine infusion (group N) or saline infusion (group C). After intrathecal injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg, the block height for cold and pinprick sensation was checked 10 and 20 min after the injection. The demographic characteristics, spinal anesthesia, side effects, and neonatal outcomes were also recorded. Results: The block height for cold and pinprick sensation was similar between the two groups, although the incidence of hypotension was significantly lower (p < 0.00) in group N than in group C. Systolic blood pressure was also more stable in group N than in group C, with the incidence of interventions being significantly lower in group N. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction between the two groups. Conclusion: Evidence from this study suggested that prophylactic norepinephrine infusion does not reduce the rostral spread of spinal anesthesia in pregnancy. We suggest that it is not necessary to increase the dose of an intrathecal local anesthetic for cesarean delivery when prophylactic norepinephrine is administered. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=152899, identifier [ChiCTR2200057439].

Norepinephrine prevents hypotension in older patients under spinal anesthesia with intravenous propofol sedation: a randomized controlled trial

Reducing hypotension is crucial as hypotension is the most common side effect of spinal anesthesia, and in older patients with various comorbidities, it can lead to fatality. We hypothesized that continuous infusion of norepinephrine could effectively prevent hypotension in older patients undergoing hip surgery under spinal anesthesia with propofol sedation. The study randomly assigned patients aged ≥ 70 years to either a control (Group C, n = 35) or a norepinephrine group (Group N, n = 35). After spinal anesthesia, continuous infusion of propofol and normal saline or norepinephrine was initiated. The number of hypotensive episodes, the primary outcome, as well as other intraoperative hemodynamic events and postoperative complications were compared. In total, 67 patients were included in the final analysis. The number of hypotensive episodes was significantly higher in Group C than in Group N (p < 0.001). Furthermore, Group C required a greater amount of fluid to maintain normovolemia (p = 0.008) and showed less urine output (p = 0.019). However, there was no difference in postoperative complications between the two groups. Continuous intravenous infusion of prophylactic norepinephrine prevented hypotensive episodes, reduced the requirement of fluid, and increased the urine output in older patients undergoing unilateral hip surgery under spinal anesthesia with propofol sedation.Clinical trial registration number: KCT0005046 ( https://cris.nih.go.kr ). IRB number: 2020-0533 (Institutional Review Board of Asan Medical Center, approval date: 13/APR/2020).

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Graded Dose-Response Study of Norepinephrine Administration for Prevention of Post-Spinal Hypotension during Elective Cesarean Delivery

Norepinephrine has been recently introduced for prophylaxis against post-spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery; however, no data are available regarding its optimum dosing scheme. The primary objective of this study is to compare three different infusion and bolus dose combinations of norepinephrine for prophylaxis against post-spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery. This randomized, double-blind study was performed between February 2021 and May 2022. The study protocol was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov with the identification number NCT04701190. A total of 192 parturients were enrolled into this study. Patients were assigned to three groups-Zero-Bolus High-Infusion (Group ZBHI, 0 µg/0.1 µg kg-1 min-1, n = 61), Moderate-Bolus Moderate-Infusion (Group MBMI, 5 µg/0.075 µg kg-1 min-1, n = 61) and High-Bolus Low-Infusion (Group HBLI, 10 µg/0.05 µg kg-1 min-1, n = 61)-according to different combinations of norepinephrine infusion and bolus doses. All patients received spinal anesthesia with 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 12.5 µg fentanyl. Immediately after cerebrospinal fluid was obtained, patients underwent a norepinephrine protocol corresponding to the randomized group. The primary outcome was the incidence of post-spinal hypotension. Secondary outcomes were post-delivery hypotension, frequency of post-spinal hypertension and bradycardia, and neonatal outcomes. The incidence of post-spinal hypotension was 11.7% in Group HBLI, 6.7% in Group ZBHI and 1.7% in Group MBMI (p = 0.1). The overall incidence of post-delivery hypotension in parturients was 41.1% (p = 0.797). The lowest frequency of post-spinal bradycardia (8.3%) and hypertension (11.7%) was seen in Group HBLI. The neonatal APGAR scores at 1st minute were higher in Group MBMI than in Group ZBHI (8.58 vs. 8.23, p = 0.001). All three infusion and bolus dose combinations of norepinephrine effectively reduced the incidence of post-spinal hypotension. However, high-dose bolus (10 µg) followed by low-dose infusion (0.05 µg kg-1 min-1) of norepinephrine can be preferred due to the reduced frequency of bradycardia and hypertension during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.

Prophylactic intravenous norepinephrine for the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Introduction: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the potential dose-response relationship between prophylactic norepinephrine (NE) infusion rates and the risks of hypotension during cesarean section following spinal anesthesia. Methods: Randomized controlled trials with two or more NE doses for post-spinal hypotension prophylaxis during cesarean section were systematically searched in the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and US Clinical Trials Registry databases until 31 July 2022. The primary outcome was the relative risk of maternal hypotension with different NE regimens (infusion rates or bolus doses). Secondary outcomes included the relative risks of maternal and fetal adverse events with different NE regimens. Results: Ten studies with 1,144 parturients were included for final analysis using restricted cubic splines and random-effects dose-response meta-analysis models. A significant dose-response relationship existed between NE infusion rates and the relative risks of maternal hypotension. Every 0.01 μg/kg/min increment in the NE infusion rate was associated with a 14% decrease in the incidence of post-spinal hypotension. ED50 and ED95 of NE infusion rates for post-spinal hypotension prophylaxis were estimated to be 0.046 (95% CI from 0.032 to 0.085) and 0.2 (95% CI from 0.14 to 0.37) μg/kg/min, respectively. However, a higher NE infusion rate was associated with a higher incidence of maternal hypertension. Conclusion: An increased NE infusion rate was associated with a decreased incidence of post-spinal hypotension but an increased incidence of hypertension. Therefore, 0.07 μg/kg/min was recommended as the initial NE infusion rate for clinical practice, as it was associated with the lowest risk of physician intervention for unstable hemodynamics after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Systematic Review Registration: (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=349934), identifier (CRD42022349934).

Anesthesia during delivery in pregnant women with dilated cardiomyopathy

Emergency cesarean delivery in patients with heart failure increases maternal and fetal mortality. The present study aimed to identify the relationship between the use of anesthesia for delivery and progressive cardiac deterioration in women with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and to examine its implications on maternal and fetal outcomes. Twenty-nine pregnancies in 25 women with DCM from the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Hospital (Suita, Japan) were included in this retrospective longitudinal study. Fourteen of the patients (48.3%) delivered via cesarean section. Among these, 4 patients (13.8%) experienced heart failure within 42 days of delivery. The indication for cesarean delivery was heart failure in 3 patients and induction failure in 1 patient. The types of anesthesia used for these patients included general (n = 1), combined spinal-epidural (n = 2), and epidural (n = 1). Two of these cesarean deliveries were performed preterm. The left ventricular ejection fraction of patients with heart failure was ≤ 35% before 34 weeks gestation. Among the 25 patients without heart failure, 2 exhibited a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤ 35% before 34 weeks gestation. Meanwhile, the types of anesthesia used for remaining 10 patients who did not experience heart failure included general (n = 1), combined spinal-epidural (n = 8), and epidural (n = 1). The rate of general anesthesia was 25% in patients who experienced heart failure and 4% in others. There was no incidence of maternal or fetal death. A preterm anesthetic evaluation may be warranted to optimize anesthetic management when the ejection fraction decreases to ≤ 35% before 34 weeks gestation in patients with DCM.

Dexmedetomidine Combined with Low-Dose Norepinephrine Continuous Pumping to Prevent Hypotension after Cesaresan Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective

The aim of the study is to explore the clinical effect of dexmedetomidine combined with low-dose norepinephrine (NE) continuous pumping in preventing supine hypotension.

Methods

A total of 160 puerperaes who underwent elective cesarean section were selected. The puerperaes were equally divided into S group (saline), D group (dexmedetomidine), N group (norepinephrine), and DN group (dexmedetomidine combined with norepinephrine) by a random number table method. Apgar scores and umbilical cord venous blood gas values were recorded at 1 and 5 minutes.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in the age, gestational age, body mass index, bleeding volume, fluid supplement volume, Apgar scores of new borns at the 1st and 5th minute, the blood gas values of umbilical cord arterial and venous in the four groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the S group, the incidence of supine hypotension, the number of NE supplements, the supplementary doses of NE, and the incidence of adverse reactions were significantly reduced in the D, N, and DN groups after spinal anesthesia (P < 0.05). Compared with group D, the incidence of supine hypotension, the number of additional NE, additional dose of NE, and the incidence of adverse reactions in the DN group after spinal anesthesia were significantly reduced (P < 0.05). Compared with the N group, the incidence of supine hypotension, the number of additional NE, the additional dose of NE, and the incidence of adverse reactions in the DN group after spinal anesthesia were significantly reduced (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Dexmedetomidine combined with continuous pumping of low-dose norepinephrine can effectively prevent the occurrence of supine hypotension, reduce the occurrence of other adverse reactions, and have no obvious adverse effects on neonates. Registration. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn/enIndex.aspx; ChiCTR2000040979).

Effect of Weight-Adjusted Phenylephrine, Norepinephrine, and Metaraminol for Elective Cesarean Delivery on Neonatal Acid–Base Status: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

Many previous trials have compared the effects of different vasoactive drugs on cesarean section patients, but their infusion rate is based on experience rather than high-quality evidence. It is difficult to judge whether the effect of vasoactive drug comes from the better choice or a more appropriate at rates of vasoactive drugs. The effect of vasoactive drugs at the rates of the 90% effective dose needs to be verified and compared.

Patients and Methods

Women undergoing elective caesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia were randomized to receive phenylephrine or norepinephrine or metaraminol infusion at the rate that was assumed to be the 90% effective dose. Anesthetic management was standardized and included fluid loading with 10 mL/kg of Ringer. The primary outcome was the umbilical artery pH.

Results

78 patients were included. The umbilical artery pH was not significantly different among the three groups (phenylephrine group: 7.33 ± 0.03 vs norepinephrine group: 7.33 ± 0.04 vs metaraminol group: 7.33 ± 0.04, P = 0.99). There were no significant differences in the incidence of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and nausea and vomiting among the three groups. The SBP of the phenylephrine group was significantly higher than that of the metaraminol group (adjustive P value = 0.005).

Conclusion

Phenylephrine (0.54 μg/kg/min) or metaraminol (2 μg/kg/min) or norepinephrine (0.08 μg/kg/min) administered to healthy patients with elective cesarean section after spinal anesthesia has no significant effect on the acid-base balance of the fetus.

Dose Selection of Ropivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture: An Up-Down Sequential Allocation Study

Objective

The dose selection of ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia in clinical work mainly depends on the experience of the anesthesiologist. In this study, a prospective and modified up-down sequential allocation design was used to provide the optimal dose selection of ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia.

Patients and methods

This study was divided into two stages, and a total of 164 elderly patients with elective hip fractures were included. In stage I, the dose of ropivacaine was selected using the up-down sequential method of height correction, and the 50% effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) were obtained. A nomogram for predicting satisfactory anesthesia and a formula for predicting the optimal dose was also given in this stage. In stage II, the dose of ropivacaine was calculated by using the optimal dose prediction formula, so as to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the model.

Results

The ED50 and ED95 of the stage I were 7.036 mg (95%CI 6.549–7.585 mg) and 8.709 mg (95%CI 7.902–14.275 mg), respectively. And provided a nomogram predicting satisfactory anesthesia with a C-index of 0.847 (95%CI 0.774–0.92). The optimal dose prediction formula of ropivacaine was calculated, including variables for age, gender, height, and weight. This formula was found to be 90% efficient. It is worth mentioning that the incidence of direct transfer to the ward in the two stages was as high as 86.84% and 93.33%, respectively, and no patients were transferred to the ICU in stage II.

Conclusion

The ED50 and ED95 of ropivacaine were 7.036 mg and 8.709 mg, respectively, and the nomograms are sufficiently accurate to predict satisfactory anesthesia. Beyond that, the dose prediction equation provided in this study has high efficacy and safety, and can guide the dose selection of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with hip fracture in clinical practice.

Clinical trials registration

ChiCTR2100046982

Comparative Dose–Response Study on the Infusion of Norepinephrine Combined with Crystalloid Coload versus Colloid Coload for Preventing Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

Background

Although the optimal infusion dose of norepinephrine combined with crystalloid coload for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH) for cesarean delivery has been established, the infusion regimen of norepinephrine combined with colloid coload has not been fully quantified. The objective of this study was to compare and determine the median effective dose (ED₅₀) and 90% effective dose (ED₉₀) of norepinephrine infusion combined with crystalloid coload versus colloid coload for preventing SAIH during cesarean delivery.

Methods

Two hundred parturients were randomly assigned to receive norepinephrine infusion at 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, or 0.10 µg/kg/min in combination with 10 mL/kg crystalloid coload or colloid coload to prevent SAIH. The study period was defined as the interval from the commencement of intrathecal injection to delivery of the neonate. The primary outcome was non-occurrence of hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 80% of the baseline before delivery. The ED₅₀ and ED₉₀ of norepinephrine infusion dose were determined using probit regression analysis. By calculating the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of relative median potency to determine whether the prophylactic infusion of norepinephrine requirement was different between the two groups.

Results

The derived ED₅₀ and ED₉₀ of norepinephrine infusion combined with crystalloid coload were 0.030 (95% CIs 0.020 to 0.038) and 0.097 (95% CIs 0.072 to 0.157) µg/kg/min, respectively. The ED₅₀ and ED₉₀ of norepinephrine infusion combined with colloid coload were 0.021 (95% CIs 0.013 to 0.029) and 0.070 (95% CIs 0.053 to 0.107) µg/kg/min, respectively. The estimate of relative median potency for norepinephrine between the two groups was 1.37 (95% CIs 0.94 to 2.23).

Conclusion

Under the conditions of this study, 10 mL/kg colloid coload reduced the dose of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion by approximately 30% in parturients during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery compared with the crystalloid coload.

Determination of the Relative Potency of Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Given as Infusions for Preventing Hypotension During Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Up-And-Down Sequential Allocation Study

Purpose: The relative potency of norepinephrine and phenylephrine given as boluses to treat hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery has been reported but few data are available for infusions. This study aimed to determine the relative potency of norepinephrine and phenylephrine when given by infusion for preventing hypotension during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, up-and-down sequential allocation study. Patients were randomly allocated to receive a prophylactic infusion of norepinephrine or phenylephrine started immediately after induction of anesthesia. The first patients received either norepinephrine 0.1 μg/kg/min or phenylephrine 0.5 μg/kg/min. An effective infusion rate was defined when no hypotension occurred before delivery. For each subsequent patient, the norepinephrine infusion rate was decreased or increased by 0.01 μg/kg/min or the phenylephrine infusion rate was decreased or increased by 0.05 μg/kg/min according to whether the infusion was effective or ineffective respectively in the previous patient. Values for the infusion rate that was effective in preventing hypotension in 50% of patients (ED50) for norepinephrine and phenylephrine were estimated using up-and-down sequential analysis and relative potency was estimated. Probit regression was used as a backup and sensitivity analysis.

Results: The ED50 values for norepinephrine and phenylephrine calculated by the up-and-down method were 0.061 (95% CI 0.054–0.068) μg/kg/min and 0.368 (95% CI 0.343–0.393) μg/kg/min respectively. The estimated relative potency ratio for ED50 for norepinephrine to phenylephrine was 6.03:1 (95% CI 5.26:1 to 6.98:1).

Conclusion: Under the conditions of this study, norepinephrine given by infusion was about 6 times more potent than phenylephrine. This information is useful for clinical practice and further comparative studies of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine.

Clinical Trial Registration:http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx, identifier [ChiCTR2200056237]

Hemodynamic and antiemetic effects of prophylactic hyoscine butyl-bromide during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Abrupt bradycardia and hemodynamic instability during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section are not uncommon and are considered as one of the primary causes of intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV). We hypothesized that prophylactic use of hyoscine butyl-bromide (HBB) could improve hemodynamics and reduce IONV in parturients undergoing cesarean section.

Methods

A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial was carried out in a tertiary university hospital, patients scheduled for elective cesarean section were equally randomized to receive either IV HBB 20 mg in 1 ml (Hyoscine group) or the same volume of 0.9% saline (Control group), one minute after spinal anesthesia. The primary endpoint was the incidence of intraoperative bradycardia (HR < 50 beats min⁻¹). Secondary endpoints included changes in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), the incidence of Intraoperative and Postoperative nausea or vomiting (IONV & PONV), the fetal heart rate and, Apgar score.

Results

Of the 160 subjects randomized, 80 received HBB and 80 received placebo. There was a significant reduction in the incidence of the primary endpoint of intraoperative bradycardia (HR < 50 beats min⁻¹) in the Hyoscine group (0% vs 10%; OR = 0.05, 95% CI = [0.003, 0.93]; P = 0.004) compared with placebo. MAP showed an insignificant difference between groups over time. HBB significantly decreased incidences of IONV and PONV (p = 0.002 & 0.004) respectively.

Conclusions

In parturients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, pretreatment with intravenous HBB was a safe measure for both the mother and the baby to reduce the risk of severe intraoperative bradycardia, but not hypotension. Furthermore, it was associated with less incidence of both IONV and PONV.

Trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04069078

Norepinephrine versus phenylephrine infusion for preventing postspinal hypotension during cesarean section for twin pregnancy: a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial

Background

Compared with singleton pregnancy, twin gestation is featured by a greater increase in cardiac output. Therefore, norepinephrine might be more suitable than phenylephrine for maintaining blood pressure during cesarean section for twins, as phenylephrine causes reflex bradycardia and a resultant decrease in cardiac output. This study was to determine whether norepinephrine was superior to phenylephrine in maintaining maternal hemodynamics during cesarean section for twins.

Methods

Informed consent was obtained from all the patients before enrollment. In this double-blinded, randomized clinical trial, 100 parturients with twin gestation undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive prophylactic norepinephrine (3.2 μg/min) or phenylephrine infusion (40 μg/min). The primary outcome was the change of heart rate and blood pressure during the study period. The secondary outcomes were to compare maternal complications, neonatal outcomes, Apgar scores and umbilical blood acid-base status between the two vasopressors.

Results

There was no significant difference observed for the change of heart rate between two vasopressors. The mean standardized area under the curve of heart rate was 78 ± 12 with norepinephrine vs. 74 ± 11 beats/min with phenylephrine (mean difference 4.4, 95%CI − 0.1 to 9.0; P = .0567). The mean standardized area under the curve of systolic blood pressure (SBP) was significantly lower in parturients with norepinephrine, as the mean of differences in standardized AUC of SBP was 6 mmHg, with a 95% CI from 2 to 9 mmHg (P = .0013). However, requirements of physician interventions for correcting maternal hemodynamical abnormalities (temporary cessation of vasopressor infusion for reactive hypertension, rescuing vasopressor bolus for hypotension and atropine for heart rate less < 50 beats/min) and neonatal outcomes were also not significantly different between two vasopressors.

Conclusion

Infusion of norepinephrine was not associated with less overall decrease in heart rate during cesarean section for twins, compared with phenylephrine.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900021281).

The impact of height on the spread of spinal anesthesia and stress response in parturients undergoing caesarean section: a prospective observational study

Background

The spread of spinal anesthesia was influenced by many factors, and the effect of body height on spinal anesthesia is still arguable. This study aimed to explore the impact of height on the spread of spinal anesthesia and the stress response in parturients.

Methods

A total of ninety-seven parturients were allocated into two groups according to their height: the shorter group (body height was shorter than 158 cm) and taller group (body height was taller than 165 cm). Spinal anesthesia was performed with the same amount of 12 mg plain ropivacaine in mothers of different heights. The primary outcome of the study was the success or failure of the spinal anesthesia. The secondary outcomes of the study were stress response, time to T6 sensory level, the incidence of hypotension, the satisfaction of abdominal muscle relaxation and patient VAS scores.

Results

The rate of successful spinal anesthesia in the shorter group was significantly higher than that in the taller group (p = 0.02). The increase of maternal cortisol level in the shorter group was lower than that in the taller group at skin closure (p = 0.001). The incidence of hypotension (p = 0.013), time to T6 sensory block (p = 0.005), the quality of abdominal muscle relaxation (p <  0.001), and VAS values in stretching abdominal muscles and uterine exteriorization (p <  0.001) in the shorter group were significantly different from those in the taller group. Multivariate analysis showed that vertebral column length (p <  0.001), abdominal girth (p = 0.022), amniotic fluid index (p = 0.022) were significantly associated with successful spinal anesthesia.

Conclusions

It’s difficult to use a single factor to predict the spread of spinal anesthesia. Patient’s vertebral column length, amniotic fluid index and abdominal girth were the high determinant factors for predicting the spread of spinal anesthesia.

Trials registration

ChiCTR-ROC-17012030 (Chictr.org.cn), registered on 18/07/2017.

Continuous epidural anesthesia with double catheters for cesarean section in a patient with severe pulmonary hypertension: A case report

RATIONALE

Pregnancy in a woman with pulmonary hypertension (PH) carries prohibitively high risks of cardiopulmonary complications and high maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Anaesthetic management during delivery or cesarean section is very important for the prognosis of pregnant women with PH. The choice between general anesthesia or intraspinal anesthesia is controversial. There have been few case reports of anesthetic management under continuous epidural anesthesia with double catheters in such patients.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 35-year-old pregnant woman presented to the emergency department with fatigue and shortness of breath for 10 days at 16 weeks of gestation.

DIAGNOSIS

According to transthoracic echocardiogram, her pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) was 75 mm Hg, and she had a dilated left ventricle (67 mm) and a ventricular septal defect (1.7 mm) with a bidirectional shunt.

INTERVENTIONS

Elective cesarean section under continuous epidural anesthesia with double catheters to terminate a pregnancy in order to avoid development of cardiac failure.

OUTCOMES

The pregnant woman underwent cesarean section safely and steadily under continuous epidural anesthesia with double catheters. She was discharged on the seventh postoperative day.

LESSONS

The advantages of continuous epidural anesthesia with double catheters are stable hemodynamics and complete analgesia. The continuous epidural anesthesia with double catheters can be applied to patients with cardiopulmonary disease like severe PH. Compared with general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, and single-catheter epidural anesthesia continuous epidural anesthesia is a better option for patients with both PH and heart failure.

The ED50 and ED95 of Prophylactic Norepinephrine for Preventing Post-Spinal Hypotension During Cesarean Delivery Under Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia: A Prospective Dose-Finding Study

Background: Hypotension commonly occurs with spinal anesthesia during cesarean delivery. Norepinephrine is an alternative to phenylephrine which can be used to prevent or treat hypotension, with better maintained cardiac output and less bradycardia. However, an appropriate initial prophylactic infusion dose of norepinephrine remains unclear. The aim of this study was to describe the dose-response relationship of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion during cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blinded dose-finding study. One hundred patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to receive an infusion of norepinephrine at 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075 or 0.1 μg/kg/min initiated immediately after intrathecal injection of 10 mg bupivacaine combined with 5 µg sufentanil. An effective dose was considered when there was no hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg or < 80% of baseline) during the time period from injection of intrathecal local anesthetic to delivery of the neonate. The primary aim was to determine the dose-response relationship of norepinephrine to prevent spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. The median effective dose (ED₅₀) and 95% effective dose (ED₉₅) for norepinephrine were calculated utilizing probit analysis. Results: The proportion of patients with hypotension was 80, 70, 40, 15 and 5% at norepinephrine doses of 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075 and 0.1 μg/kg/min, respectively. The ED₅₀ and ED₉₅ were 0.042 (95% CI, 0.025-0.053) µg/kg/min and 0.097 (95% CI, 0.081-0.134) µg/kg/min, respectively. There were no differences in the Apgar scores (p = 0.685) or umbilical arterial pH (p = 0.485) measurements of the newborns among the treatment groups. Conclusion: A norepinephrine infusion of 0.1 μg/kg/min as an initial starting dose was effective for the prevention of spinal-induced hypotension.

A Randomized Double-Blinded Dose-dependent Study of Metaraminol for Preventing Spinal-Induced Hypotension in Caesarean Delivery

Purpose: Prophylactic infusion of a vasopressor is preferred as a rational choice in clinical practice in Cesarean delivery. Metaraminol is one of most common vasopressors used in obstetric clinical practice. However, the dose-response of metaraminol has not been fully determined and the optimal infusion dose is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the median effective dose (ED50) and 90% effective dose (ED90) of weight-based fixed-rate metaraminol infusions for preventing spinal-anesthesia-induced hypotension in patients having combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for elective Caesarean delivery.

Methods: One hundred and seventeen patients with singleton pregnancies were enrolled and randomly allocated into one of five groups in this study. Patients received prophylactic metaraminol infusion at a fixed rate of 0, 0.25, 1.0, 1.75 or 2.5 μg/kg/min in each group immediately after induction with intrathecal 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine mixed with 5 μg of sufentanil. An effective prophylactic dose was defined as no occurrence of hypotension during the period of spinal introduction and neonatal delivery. Values for ED50 and ED90 of prophylactic infusion of metaraminol were calculated using probit regression. Characteristics of spinal anesthesia and side effects were recorded.

Results: The ED50 and ED90 values of weight-based fixed rate of metaraminol infusion were 0.64 (95% CI, 0.04–1.00) μg/kg/min and 2.00 (95% CI, 1.58–2.95) μg/kg/min respectively. The incidence of hypotension decreased with an increased infusion rate of metaraminol in the five groups (test for trend, p < 0.001). The incidence of hypotension was similar between group 0 and 0.25, but significant higher than other groups; the incidence of hypotension was also similar between group 1.0 and 1.75, but higher than group 2.5. The incidence of reactive hypertension was significantly higher in group 2.5 compared to the other groups. Physician interventions were more frequent in group 0, 0.25 and 2.5 than in group 1.0 and 1.75 (adjusted p < 0.001). No difference was found in neonatal outcomes, including Apgar score and pH value of the umbilical artery.

Conclusion: In summary, we have compared four different prophylactic weight-based infusion doses of metaraminol for preventing post-spinal hypotension in Cesarean delivery. The ED₅₀ and ED₉₀ values of metaraminol infusion for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension were 0.64 μg/kg/min and 2.00 μg/kg/min, respectively. This finding may be helpful for guiding clinical practice and further research.

Comparison of General, Epidural, and Spinal Anesthesia in Laparoscopic TEP (Total Extraperitoneal Repair) for Inguinal Hernia

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) is one of the most preferred minimally invasive methods for inguinal hernia repair. In our study, we aimed to compare the advantages and disadvantages of general anesthesia (GA), spinal anesthesia (SA), and epidural anesthesia (EA) for TEP operations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study involving 221 patients who underwent TEP surgery for inguinal hernia between January 2018 and July 2020. Patients were divided into 3 groups as GA (n=77), SA (n=70), and EA (n=74). Demographic data of the patients, duration of anesthesia and surgery, perioperative and postoperative complications, postoperative pain, anatomical delineation, hospital stay and quality of life were evaluated.

RESULTS

Anesthesia time was the longest in the EA group (23.1±2.32 min) and significantly prolonged the operation time (P<0.001). When the visual analog scale scores were compared, it was observed that the patients in the GA group felt significantly more pain (P<0.001). While the rates of hypotension and headache were higher in regional anesthesia (P<0.001 and P<0.002), there was no significant difference in urinary retention, postoperative nausea/vomiting, and shoulder pain (P=0.274, 0.262, and 0.314, respectively). SA and EA groups were found to be superior compared with the GA group in terms of patient satisfaction (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Regional anesthesia (SA and EA) can be safely performed in TEP surgeries, gives results similar to the anatomical delineation satisfactory and complication rates of GA, and results in less postoperative pain.

Prophylactic norepinephrine infusion for postspinal anesthesia hypotension in patients undergoing cesarean section: A randomized, controlled, dose-finding trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Prophylactic norepinephrine infusion effectively lowers the incidence of postspinal anesthesia hypotension. The optimal prophylactic dose of norepinephrine remains undefined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the optimal prophylactic dose of norepinephrine to prevent postspinal anesthesia hypotension in patients undergoing cesarean section.

DESIGN

Prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled, dose-finding trial.

SETTING

Operating room from March 2020 to June 2020.

PATIENTS

Ninety nine primipara or multipara women 18 - 40 years of age, singleton pregnancy ≥ 37 weeks, American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status 1 or 2, scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were included in this study.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomly assigned into groups to receive normal saline (NS) or one of four different prophylactic doses (0.025 [NE25], 0.05 [NE50], 0.075 [NE75], and 0.1 [NE100] ug/kg/min) of norepinephrine. The primary end point was the incidence of postspinal anesthesia hypotension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] < 80% of baseline) within 15 min after spinal anesthesia. Secondary outcomes included the overall stability of SBP control versus baseline (median performance error [MDPE] and median absolute performance error [MDAPE]), the dose that would be effective in preventing postspinal anesthesia hypotension in 50% (effective dose, ED 50) and 90% (ED90) of patients, other adverse events (bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, hypertension, and the total additional bolus of norepinephrine and atropine), and neonatal outcomes (blood gas values and Apgar scores).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The incidence of postspinal anesthesia hypotension in NS, NE25, NE50, NE75, and NE100 groups was 68.42% (13/19), 40.00% (8/20), 20.00% (4/20), 15.00% (3/20), and 10.00% (2/20), respectively. With increasing prophylactic doses of norepinephrine, the incidence of postspinal anesthesia hypotension decreased (p < 0.001), SBP was maintained closer to the baseline (MDPE, p < 0.001; MDAPE, p = 0.001), and the total additional bolus of norepinephrine decreased (p < 0.001). The ED50 and ED90 values of norepinephrine were 0.016 (95% CI: -0.014 - 0.033) and 0.088 (95% CI: 0.068 - 0.133) ug/kg/min, respectively. Other adverse effects, neonatal outcomes, and the total additional bolus of atropine did not differ among the five groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A prophylactic dose of 0.05 or 0.075 μg/kg/min norepinephrine prevents postspinal anesthesia hypotension in patients undergoing cesarean section.

Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses to Administration of Vasopressin and Norepinephrine Under General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The authors performed a meta-analysis to determine if vasopressin improves hypotension more than norepinephrine under general anesthesia.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

SETTING

Operating room.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent surgery, with general anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

Administration of vasopressin or norepinephrine in order to increase blood pressure.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome of this study was to determine if vasopressin increased mean blood pressure more effectively compared with norepinephrine for patients under general anesthesia. The secondary outcome was to see if vasopressin increased heart rate (HR), central venous pressure (CVP), cardiac output (CO), and cardiac index (CI) more significantly compared with norepinephrine under general anesthesia. The authors calculated the weighted mean difference, with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model, and calculated the required information size (RIS) by performing trial sequential analysis (TSA). The authors selected 6 studies for analysis. Vasopressin did not improve hypotension compared with norepinephrine under general anesthesia. (weighted mean difference = -0.84 mmHg, 95% CI: -5.90 to 4.23, p = 0.75, Cochran Q = 24.6, I² = 84%) In TSA, only 35.5% of RIS was achieved. Similarly, vasopressin and norepinephrine were not significantly different in terms of HR, CVP, CO, and CI. In TSA, only 23.7% of the RIS was reached for HR but RIS was almost achieved for CVP and CO.

CONCLUSIONS

Vasopressin did not improve hypotension compared with norepinephrine under general anesthesia. The RIS was not reached in TSA, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation is very low. Therefore, further research is needed to reach more robust conclusions.

Control of Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Adults

Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH) occurs frequently, particularly in the elderly and in patients undergoing caesarean section. SAIH is caused by arterial and venous vasodilatation resulting from the sympathetic block along with a paradoxical activation of cardioinhibitory receptors. Bradycardia after spinal anesthesia (SA) must always be treated as a warning sign of an important hemodynamic compromise. Fluid preloading (before initiation of the SA) with colloids such as hydroxyethyl starch (HES) effectively reduces the incidence and severity of arterial hypotension, whereas crystalloid preloading is not indicated. Co-loading with crystalloid or colloid is as equally effective to HES preloading, provided that the speed of administration is adequate (ie, bolus over 5 to 10 minutes). Ephedrine has traditionally been considered the vasoconstrictor of choice, especially for use during SAIH associated with bradycardia. Phenylephrine, a α₁ adrenergic receptor agonist, is increasingly used to treat SAIH and its prophylactic administration (ie, immediately after intrathecal injection of local anesthetics) has been shown to decrease the incidence of arterial hypotension. The role of norepinephrine as a possible alternative to phenylephrine seems promising. Other drugs, such as serotonin receptor antagonists (ondansetron), have been shown to limit the blood pressure drop after SA by inhibiting the Bezold–Jarisch reflex (BJR), but further studies are needed before their widespread use can be recommended.

Comparison of two Norepinephrine rescue bolus for Management of Post-spinal Hypotension during Cesarean Delivery: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Data on the best norepinephrine bolus dose for management of hypotension are limited. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two norepinephrine bolus doses in the rescue management of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery.

Methods

This randomized, controlled trial included mothers scheduled for cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia with a prophylactic norepinephrine infusion. Following spinal anaesthesia administration, a participant was considered hypotensive if systolic blood pressure was ≤80% compared to the baseline reading. Participants were allocated to receive either 6 mcg or 10 mcg norepinephrine bolus for the management of hypotensive episodes. The hemodynamic response after administration of norepinephrine bolus was recorded. The episode was considered successfully managed if systolic blood pressure returned to within 80% from the baseline reading within 2 min after norepinephrine bolus administration, and did not drop again within 6 min after the norepinephrine bolus. The primary outcome was the incidence of successful management of the first hypotensive episode. Other outcomes included systolic blood pressure, heart rate, incidence of maternal bradycardia, and reactive hypertension.

Results

One hundred and ten mothers developed hypotensive episodes and received norepinephrine boluses for management. The number of successfully managed first hypotensive episodes was 50/57 (88%) in the 6 mcg-treated episodes and 45/53 (85%) in the 10 mcg-treated episodes (p = 0.78). Systolic blood pressure was comparable after administration of either bolus dose. Heart rate was lower after administration of 10 mcg bolus compared to 6 mcg bolus, without significant bradycardia requiring atropine administration. The incidence of reactive hypertension was comparable between both groups.

Conclusion

In mothers undergoing elective cesarean delivery under prophylactic norepinephrine infusion at 0.05 mcg/kg/min, there was no advantage to the use of 10 mcg norepinephrine bolus over 6 mcg norepinephrine bolus for the rescue management of first hypotensive episode. Neither of the 2 bolus doses reached a 100% success rate. The incidences of bradycardia and reactive hypertension were comparable between both norepinephrine doses.

Trial registration

At clinicaltrial.gov registry system on January 4, 2019 Clinical trial identifier: NCT03792906.