Continuous ward monitoring: the selection, monitoring, alarms, response, treatment (SMART) road map

Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring in Patients Having Surgery: A Narrative Review

Hypotension can occur before, during, and after surgery and is associated with postoperative complications. Anesthesiologists should thus avoid profound and prolonged hypotension. A crucial part of avoiding hypotension is accurate and tight blood pressure monitoring. In this narrative review, we briefly describe methods for continuous blood pressure monitoring, discuss current evidence for continuous blood pressure monitoring in patients having surgery to reduce perioperative hypotension, and expand on future directions and innovations in this field. In summary, continuous blood pressure monitoring with arterial catheters or noninvasive sensors enables clinicians to detect and treat hypotension immediately. Furthermore, advanced hemodynamic monitoring technologies and artificial intelligence-in combination with continuous blood pressure monitoring-may help clinicians identify underlying causes of hypotension or even predict hypotension before it occurs.

Patient monitoring, wearable devices, and the healthcare information ecosystem

Conventional patient vital signs monitoring fails to detect many signs of patient deterioration, including those in the critical postoperative period. Wearable monitors can allow continuous vital signs monitoring, send data wirelessly to the electronic healthcare record, and reduce the number of unplanned admissions to intensive care.

Wireless wearables for postoperative surveillance on surgical wards: a survey of 1158 anaesthesiologists in Western Europe and the USA

Background

Several continuous monitoring solutions, including wireless wearable sensors, are available or being developed to improve patient surveillance on surgical wards. We designed a survey to understand the current perception and expectations of anaesthesiologists who, as perioperative physicians, are increasingly involved in postoperative care.

Methods

The survey was shared in 40 university hospitals from Western Europe and the USA.

Results

From 5744 anaesthesiologists who received the survey link, there were 1158 valid questionnaires available for analysis. Current postoperative surveillance was mainly based on intermittent spot-checks of vital signs every 4-6 h in the USA (72%) and every 8-12 h in Europe (53%). A majority of respondents (91%) considered that continuous monitoring of vital signs should be available on surgical wards and that wireless sensors are preferable to tethered systems (86%). Most respondents indicated that oxygen saturation (93%), heart rate (80%), and blood pressure (71%) should be continuously monitored with wrist devices (71%) or skin adhesive patches (54%). They believed it may help detect clinical deterioration earlier (90%), decrease rescue interventions (59%), and decrease hospital mortality (54%). Opinions diverged regarding the impact on nurse workload (increase 46%, decrease 39%), and most respondents considered that the biggest implementation challenges are economic (79%) and connectivity issues (64%).

Conclusion

Continuous monitoring of vital signs with wireless sensors is wanted by most anaesthesiologists from university hospitals in Western Europe and in the USA. They believe it may improve patient safety and outcome, but may also be challenging to implement because of cost and connectivity issues.