1
|
Žarskus A, Zykutė D, Lukoševičius S, Jankauskas A, Trepenaitis D, Macas A. Precise Terminology and Specified Catheter Insertion Length in Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Central Vein Catheterization. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 60:28. [PMID: 38256289 PMCID: PMC10820046 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: As the latest research encourages the ultrasound-guided infraclavicular central venous approach, due to the lateral puncture site displacement, in comparison to the anatomical landmark technique based on subclavian vein catheterization, the need to re-calculate the optimal catheter insertion length and possibly to rename the punctuated vessel emerges. Although naming a particular anatomical structure is a nomenclature issue, a suboptimal catheter position can be associated with multiple life-threatening complications and must be avoided. The main study objective is to determine the optimal catheter insertion length by the most proximal ultrasound-guided, in-plane infraclavicular central vein approach, to compare results with the anatomical landmark technique based on subclavian vein catheterization and to clarify the punctuated anatomical structure. Materials and Methods: 109 patients were enrolled in this study. All procedures were performed according to the same catheterization protocol. In order to determine optimal insertion length, chest X-ray scans with an existing catheter were performed. The definition of punctuated vessel was based on computer tomography and evaluated by radiologists. Independent predictors for optimal insertion length were identified, prediction equations were generated. Results: The optimal catheter insertion length is approximately 1.5 cm longer than estimated by Pere's formula and can be accurately calculated based on anthropometric data. Computed tomography revealed: five cases with subclavian vein puncture and three cases with axillary vein puncture. Conclusions: Even the most proximal ultrasound-guided infraclavicular central vein access does not guarantee subclavian vein catheterization. A more accurate term could be infraclavicular central venous access, with the implication that the entry point could be through either subclavian or axillary veins. The optimal insertion length is approximately 1.5 cm deeper than the length determined for the anatomical landmark technique based on subclavian vein catheterization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ainius Žarskus
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Dalia Zykutė
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Saulius Lukoševičius
- Department of Radiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Antanas Jankauskas
- Department of Radiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Darius Trepenaitis
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Andrius Macas
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Weber MD, Conlon T, Woods-Hill C, Watts SL, Nelson E, Traynor D, Zhang B, Davis D, Himebauch AS. Retrospective Assessment of Patient and Catheter Characteristics Associated With Malpositioned Central Venous Catheters in Pediatric Patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2022; 23:192-200. [PMID: 34999641 PMCID: PMC8897221 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to determine the prevalence and characteristics associated with malpositioned temporary, nontunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) placed via the internal jugular (IJ) and subclavian (SC) veins in pediatric patients. DESIGN Single-center retrospective cohort study. SETTING Quaternary academic PICU. PATIENTS Children greater than 1 month to less than 18 years who had a CVC placed between January 2014 and December 2018. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The primary outcome was the CVC tip position located on the first postprocedural radiograph. CVC tip was defined as follows: "recommended" (tip location between the carina and two vertebral bodies inferior to the carina), "high" (tip location between one and four vertebral bodies superior to the carina), "low" (tip position three or more vertebral bodies inferior to the carina), and "other" (tip grossly malpositioned). Seven hundred eighty-one CVCs were included: 481 (61.6%) were in "recommended" position, 157 (20.1%) were "high," 131 (16.8%) were "low," and 12 (1.5%) were "other." Multiple multinomial regression (referenced to "recommended" position) showed that left-sided catheters (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.00, 95% CI 1.17-3.40) were associated with "high" CVC tip positions, whereas weight greater than or equal to 40 kg had decreased odds of having a "high" CVC tip compared with the reference (aOR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.83). Further, weight category 20-40 kg (aOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.38-4.23) and females (aOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.01-2.26) were associated with "low" CVC tip positions. There was no difference in rates of central line-associated blood stream infection, venous thromboembolism, or tissue plasminogen activator usage or dose between the CVCs with tips outside and those within the recommended location. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of IJ and SC CVC tips outside of the recommended location was high. Left-sided catheters, patient weight, and sex were associated with malposition. Malpositioned catheters were not associated with increased harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark D. Weber
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, School of Nursing at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas Conlon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charlotte Woods-Hill
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephanie L. Watts
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, School of Nursing at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Eileen Nelson
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Nursing, Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Danielle Traynor
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Nursing, Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Bingqing Zhang
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Data Science and Biostatistics Unit
| | - Daniela Davis
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Adam S. Himebauch
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oh C, Hong B, Jo Y, Chung W, Kim H, Shin S, Choi AY, Lim C, Ko Y, Kim YH, Lee SY. A retrospective comparison for prediction of optimal length of right subclavian vein catheterization in infants: landmark-based estimation vs. linear regression model. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) 2021; 16:258-265. [PMID: 34352966 PMCID: PMC8342824 DOI: 10.17085/apm.21021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal insertion length for right subclavian vein catheterization in infants has not been determined. This study retrospectively compared landmark-based and linear regression model-based estimation of optimal insertion length for right subclavian vein catheterization in pediatric patients of corrected age < 1 year. Methods Fifty catheterizations of the right subclavian vein were analyzed. The landmark related distances were: from the needle insertion point (I) to the tip of the sternal head of the right clavicle (A) and from A to the midpoint (B) of the perpendicular line drawn from the sternal head of the right clavicle to the line connecting the nipples. The optimal length of insertion was retrospectively determined by reviewing post-procedural chest radiographs. Estimates using a landmark-based equation (IA + AB – intercept) and a linear regression model were compared with the optimal length of insertion. Results A landmark-based equation was determined as IA + AB – 5. The mean difference between the landmark-based estimate and the optimal insertion length was 1.0 mm (95% limits of agreement –18.2 to 20.3 mm). The mean difference between the linear regression model (26.681 – 4.014 × weight + 0.576 × IA + 0.537 × AB – 0.482 × postmenstrual age) and the optimal insertion length was 0 mm (95% limits of agreement –16.7 to 16.7 mm). The difference between the estimates using these two methods was not significant. Conclusions A simple landmark-based equation may be useful for estimating optimal insertion length in pediatric patients of corrected age < 1 year undergoing right subclavian vein catheterization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chahyun Oh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Boohwi Hong
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Yumin Jo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Woosuk Chung
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Hoseop Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Suyeon Shin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Ah Young Choi
- Department of Pediatrics, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Chaeseong Lim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Youngkwon Ko
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Yoon-Hee Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Sun Yeul Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Anandaswamy TC, Marulasiddappa V. A comparative study of landmark-based topographic method versus the formula method for estimating depth of insertion of right subclavian central venous catheters. Indian J Anaesth 2016; 60:496-8. [PMID: 27512166 PMCID: PMC4966354 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.186021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims: Subclavian central venous catheterisation (CVC) is employed in critically ill patients requiring long-term central venous access. There is no gold standard for estimating their depth of insertion. In this study, we compared the landmark topographic method with the formula technique for estimating depth of insertion of right subclavian CVCs. Methods: Two hundred and sixty patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit requiring subclavian CVC were randomly assigned to either topographic method or formula method (130 in each group). Catheter tip position in relation to the carina was measured on a post-procedure chest X-ray. The primary endpoint was the need for catheter repositioning. Mann–Whitney test and Chi-square test was performed for statistical analysis using SPSS for windows version 18.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Results: Nearly, half the catheters positioned by both the methods were situated >1 cm below the carina and required repositioning. Conclusion: Both the techniques were not effective in estimating the approximate depth of insertion of right subclavian CVCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejesh C Anandaswamy
- Department of Anaesthesiology, MS Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Vinay Marulasiddappa
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|