The effectiveness of a bundle in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia

Impact of a Rounding Checklist Implementation in the Trauma Intensive Care Unit on Clinical Outcomes

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an intensive care unit (ICU) round checklist, FAST HUGS BID (Feeding, Analgesia, Sedation, Thromboembolic prophylaxis, Head-of-bed elevation, Ulcer prophylaxis, Glycemic control, Spontaneous breathing trial, Bowel regimen, Indwelling catheter removal, and De-escalation of antibiotics-abbreviated as FD hereafter), in improving clinical outcomes in patients with severe trauma. We included patients admitted to our trauma ICU from 2016 to 2020 and divided them into two groups: before (before-FD, 2016-2017) and after (after-FD, 2019-2020) implementation of the checklist. We compared patient characteristics and clinical outcomes, including ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable logistic regression models; furthermore, multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with ICU and hospital LOS. Compared with the before-FD group, the after-FD group had significantly lower in-hospital mortality and complication rates, shorter ICU and hospital LOS, and reduced duration of mechanical ventilation. Moreover, implementation of the checklist was a significant independent factor in reducing ICU and hospital LOS and in-hospital mortality. Implementation of the FD checklist is associated with decreased ICU and hospital LOS and in-hospital mortality.

Prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia through care bundles: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) represents a common hospital-acquired infection among mechanically ventilated patients. We summarized evidence concerning ventilator care bundles to prevent VAP.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Randomized controlled trials and controlled observational studies of adults undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV) for at least 48 h were considered for inclusion. Outcomes of interest were the number of VAP episodes, duration of MV, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and mortality. A systematic search was conducted in the MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science between 1985 and 2022. Results are reported as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022341780.

Results

Thirty-six studies including 116,873 MV participants met the inclusion criteria. A total of 84,031 participants underwent care bundles for VAP prevention. The most reported component of the ventilator bundle was head-of-bed elevation (n=83,146), followed by oral care (n=80,787). A reduction in the number of VAP episodes was observed among those receiving ventilator care bundles, compared with the non-care bundle group (OR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.54). Additionally, the implementation of care bundles decreased the duration of MV (MD=-0.59, 95% CI: -1.03, -0.15) and hospital length of stay (MD=-1.24, 95% CI: -2.30, -0.18) in studies where educational activities were part of the bundle. Data regarding mortality were inconclusive.

Conclusions

The implementation of ventilator care bundles reduced the number of VAP episodes and the duration of MV in adult ICUs. Their application in combination with educational activities seemed to improve clinical outcomes.

Impact of a dental care intervention on the hospital mortality of critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units: A quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the impact of providing dental care to critically ill patients on their risk of death and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

METHODS

A quasi-experimental study was conducted in 2 intensive care units (ICU) from 2016 to 2019. The intervention consisted of implementing routine dental care, focusing on oral hygiene and periodontal treatment, at least 3 times a week, for patients admitted to the study units. In the pre-intervention period, routine oral hygiene was provided by the ICU nursing staff. The primary and secondary study outcomes were mortality, evaluated at the end of the ICU stay, and VAP incidence density, respectively. Data were analyzed using the ARIMA (autoregressive integrated moving average) time series model in R software.

RESULTS

During the intervention period, 5,147 dental procedures were performed among 355 patients. The time series showed that ICU mortality was 36.11%, 32.71%, and 32.30% within the 3 years before the intervention, and 28.71% during the intervention period (P = .015). VAP incidence density did not significantly change during the study period (P = .716).

CONCLUSION

A dental care intervention focused on oral hygiene and periodontal treatment regularly provided by dentists to critically ill patients may decrease their risk of dying in the ICU. Randomized clinical trials should be performed to confirm these findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

WHO-affiliated Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry. RBR-4jmz36. Registered 7 October 2018, before first patient enrollment.

Effect of modified care bundle for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically-ill neurosurgical patients

Background:

Care bundles for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) have been shown to minimize the rate of VAP in critically ill patients. Standard care bundles may need to be modified in resource-constrained situations. The goal of this study was to see if our modified VAP-care bundles lowered the risk of VAP in neurosurgical patients.

Methods:

A prospective cohort study was conducted in mechanically ventilated neurosurgical patients. The VAP bundle was adjusted in the cohort group by increasing the frequency of intermittent endotracheal tube cuff pressure monitoring to six times a day while reducing oral care with 0.12% chlorhexidine to three times a day. The rate of VAP was compared to the historical control group.

Results:

A total of 146 and 145 patients were enrolled in control and cohort groups, respectively. The mean age of patients was 52±16 years in both groups (P=0.803). The admission Glasgow coma scores were 7.79±2.67 and 7.80±2.77 in control and cohort group, respectively (P=0.969). VAP was found in nine patients in control group but only one patient in cohort group. The occurrence rate of VAP was significantly reduced in cohort group compared to control group (0.88/1,000 vs. 6.84/1,000 ventilator days, P=0.036).

Conclusions:

The modified VAP bundle is effective in lowering the VAP rate in critically ill neurosurgical patients. It requires low budget and manpower and can be employed in resource-constrained settings.

Economic and Epidemiological Impact of an Improvement Plan for the Decrease of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in a Tertiary Hospital in Mexico

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this work is to measure the economic and epidemiological impact of the implementation of a comprehensive quality improvement plan (CQIP) for the prevention and reduction of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in the adult intensive care unit in a Mexican hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional, ambispective, comparative, analytical, observational study was conducted with epidemiological data on cases of health care-associated infections and with information from the Hospital Epidemiological Surveillance Unit from August 2017 to July 2018.

RESULTS

Before to the implementation of the CQIP, there were a total of 26 VAPs, with a rate of 32.2 per 1000 ventilator-days. After the implementation of CQIP, there were 14 VAPs, with a rate of 23.4 per 1000 ventilator-days, with a 46.2% decrease in incidence (P = 0.02). Before the installation of the interventions, the expense was $4,471,073.80, with an average cost per case of $171,964.38. The total cost per bed-day in the adult intensive care unit was $331,280.00, and for hospitalization, the cost was $192,038.00; for the use of antimicrobials, an expense of $749,689.20 was calculated, and for the use of mechanical ventilation, the cost was $2,974,275.60. The percentage of decrease in the cost of VAP after CQIP implementation was 46.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of CQIP based on the risk evaluation factors of VAP resulted in their decrease, which is reflected in a patient safety and quality care improvement.

A systematic scoping review of the cost-impact of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) intervention bundles in intensive care

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based economic decision making is key in health care. Presently, however, studies reporting financial outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) care bundles have not been systematically evaluated.

METHOD

This scoping review investigated the characteristics and findings of studies of the economic impact of VAP bundle implementation. A systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL) for relevant English language studies was undertaken (January 2000-February 2020). Methodological quality was evaluated using a Joanna Briggs Institute quality appraisal checklist. Article screening and quality appraisals were performed by 2 reviewers. Reference lists of included studies were hand-searched for additional articles. Reporting followed PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) standards.

RESULTS

From 181 citations, 10 articles met inclusion criteria. Eight studies evaluated cost impacts on acute care and there were 2 cost-modeling studies. Results consistently indicated that effective VAP bundle implementation decreased healthcare costs. However, studies were heterogeneous with respect to research methods and objectives and were judged to have a moderate-to-high risk of bias.

DISCUSSION

Effective implementation of VAP care bundles was associated with superior clinical and economic outcomes. However, despite finding a moderate volume of research, study heterogeneity inhibited strong conclusions being drawn regarding the degree of associated cost savings.

CONCLUSION

Additional research involving multisite/multijurisdiction studies using experimental designs are needed to progress the field and overcome gaps in the existing literature.

The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Education Program for Intensive Care Unit Staff Regarding Ventilator Care Bundle on the Frequency of Ventilator-Associated Events

BACKGROUND

Ventilator bundles have been reported to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, data concerning the role of the education of the intensive care unit (ICU) staff regarding the items in the bundle and the importance to adhere to its items on the development of ventilator-associated events (VAEs) are limited. This study aimed to compare the frequency of VAEs in subjects admitted to the ICU before and after the education of the ICU staff.

METHODS

A total of 105 subjects were enrolled in this retrospective study. The ICU staff, including the physicians, respiratory therapists, and nurses, received a 2-day educational lecture regarding items in the bundle as well as the need to adhere to its items. The study population was divided into two according to the admission date: subjects who were admitted before the education of the ICU staff regarding the ventilator bundle (preeducation) and subjects who were admitted after the education of the ICU staff regarding the ventilator bundle (posteducation). The difference in VAE rate in subjects admitted before and after bundle training was the primary outcome measure of this study.

RESULTS

The bundle compliance rates presented by days were significantly higher in the posteducation group compared with the preeducation group. Moreover, the frequency of VAEs was significantly lower in posteducation subjects compared with preeducation subjects (4.7% vs 19.0%, P = .042). Ventilator-associated event rate was also lower in posteducation subjects compared with preeducation subjects (2.5/1000 vs 9.8/1000 ventilator days). There were no significant differences among the groups with respect to ICU mortality.

CONCLUSION

The educational intervention performed in this study not only increased the adherence to the ventilator care bundle but also led to a significant reduction in the rate of the VAEs in patients receiving mechanical ventilator support in the ICU.

Combination of toothbrushing and chlorhexidine compared with exclusive use of chlorhexidine to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review with meta-analysis

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of 0.12% chlorhexidine alone and 0.12% chlorhexidine in combination with toothbrushing to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in mechanically ventilated patients. The Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Literature, PubMed, Scientific Electronic Library Online, Scopus, LIVIVO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, OpenThesis, and Open Access Thesis and Dissertations databases were used. Only randomized controlled trials without restrictions on the year or language of publication were included. Two reviewers assessed the risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model estimated the combined relative risk (RR). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. Initially, 2,337 studies were identified, of which 4 were considered in the systematic review and 3 in the meta-analysis (total sample: 796 patients). The studies were published between 2009 and 2017. All eligible studies had a low risk of bias. The meta-analysis revealed that the risk of VAP was 24% lower in patients receiving chlorhexidine combined with toothbrushing than in those receiving chlorhexidine alone (RR: 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.55-1.06), with moderate certainty of evidence and without statistical significance. In conclusion, considering the limitations of this study, a standard protocol for the prevention of VAP is not yet recommended. More studies with larger sample sizes are needed to draw strong conclusions. However, considering that toothbrushing is a simple intervention, it should be a common practice in mechanically ventilated patients, especially among patients with coronavirus disease.

Care bundles for improving outcomes in patients with COVID-19 or related conditions in intensive care - a rapid scoping review

BACKGROUND

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the strain of coronavirus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause serious illness in some people resulting in admission to intensive care units (ICU) and frequently, ventilatory support for acute respiratory failure. Evaluating ICU care, and what is effective in improving outcomes for these patients is critical. Care bundles, a small set of evidence-based interventions, delivered together consistently, may improve patient outcomes. To identify the extent of the available evidence on the use of care bundles in patients with COVID-19 in the ICU, the World Health Organization (WHO) commissioned a scoping review to inform WHO guideline discussions. This review does not assess the effectiveness of the findings, assess risk of bias, or assess the certainty of the evidence (GRADE). As this review was commissioned to inform guideline discussions, it was done rapidly over a three-week period from 26 October to 18 November 2020.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and describe the available evidence on the use of care bundles in the ICU for patients with COVID-19 or related conditions (acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) viral pneumonia or pneumonitis), or both. In carrying out the review the focus was on characterising the evidence base and not evaluating the effectiveness or safety of the care bundles or their component parts.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL and the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform on 26 October 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies of all designs that reported on patients who are critically ill with COVID-19, ARDS, viral pneumonia or pneumonitis, in the ICU setting, where a care bundle was implemented in providing care, were eligible for inclusion. One review author (VS) screened all records on title and abstract. A second review author (DR) checked 20% of excluded and included records; agreement was 99.4% and 100% respectively on exclude/include decisions. Two review authors (VS and DR) independently screened all records at full-text level. VS and DR resolved any disagreements through discussion and consensus, or referral to a third review author (AN) as required.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One review author (VS) extracted the data and a second review author (DR) checked 20% of this for accuracy. As the review was not designed to synthesise effectiveness data, assess risk of bias, or characterise the certainty of the evidence (GRADE), we mapped the extracted data and presented them in tabular format based on the patient condition; that is patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19, patients with ARDS, patients with any influenza or viral pneumonia, patients with severe respiratory failure, and patients with mixed conditions. We have also provided a narrative summary of the findings from the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 21 studies and identified three ongoing studies. The studies were of variable designs and included a systematic review of standardised approaches to caring for critically ill patients in ICU, including but not exclusive to care bundles (1 study), a randomised trial (1 study), prospective and retrospective cohort studies (4 studies), before and after studies (7 studies), observational quality improvement reports (4 studies), case series/case reports (3 studies) and audit (1 study). The studies were conducted in eight countries, most commonly China (5 studies) and the USA (4 studies), were published between 1999 and 2020, and involved over 2000 participants in total. Studies categorised participant conditions patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 (7 studies), patients with ARDS (7 studies), patients with another influenza or viral pneumonia (5 studies), patients with severe respiratory failure (1 study), and patients with mixed conditions (1 study). The care bundles described in the studies involved multiple diverse practices. Guidance on ventilator settings (10 studies), restrictive fluid management (8 studies), sedation (7 studies) and prone positioning (7 studies) were identified most frequently, while only one study mentioned chest X-ray. None of the included studies reported the prespecified outcomes ICU-acquired weakness (muscle wasting, weight loss) and users' experience adapting care bundles. Of the remaining prespecified outcomes, 14 studies reported death in ICU, nine reported days of ventilation (or ventilator-free days), nine reported length of stay in ICU in days, five reported death in hospital, three reported length of stay in hospital in days, and three reported adherence to the bundle.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review has identified 21 studies on care bundle use in critically ill patients in ICU with COVID-19, ARDS, viral influenza or pneumonia and severe respiratory failure. The data for patients with COVID-19 specifically are limited, derived mainly from observational quality improvement or clinical experiential accounts. Research is required, urgently, to further assess care bundle use and optimal components of these bundles in this patient cohort. The care bundles described were also varied, with guidance on ventilator settings described in 10 care bundles, while chest X-ray was part mentioned in one care bundle in one study only. None of the studies identified in this scoping review measured users' experience of adapting care bundles. Optimising care bundle implementation requires that the components of the care bundle are collectively and consistently applied. Data on challenges, barriers and facilitators to implementation are needed. A formal synthesis of the outcome data presented in this review and a critical appraisal of the evidence is required by a subsequent effectiveness review. This subsequent review should further explore effect estimates across the included studies.

Efeitos da utilização do bundle na prevenção de pneumonia associada à ventilação mecânica: revisão integrativa

Introdução: A Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica é uma infecção relacionada à assistência à saúde que predomina em unidades de terapia intensiva e que compromete a segurança do paciente. Objetivo: Identificar na literatura científica os efeitos do uso de Bundles na prevenção da Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva. Método: Revisão integrativa realizada com estudos disponibilizados nas bases dados online: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cocrhane, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Scientific Electronic Library Online e Scopus. A busca dos estudos nas bases de dados se deu no período de dois de junho a 18 de julho de 2018, no idioma inglês ou português, sem limite de tempo de publicação, utilizando os termos dos DeCS e MeSH. O recrutamento foi realizado por dois pesquisadores independentes. Dos artigos selecionados, extraíram-se as informações: ano, país de origem, objetivo(s), grau de recomendação científica e tipo de estudo, intervenção, conformidade do uso do Bundle, principais resultados e conclusões. Resultados: Dentre as 20 publicações analisadas, 13 eram de diferentes países e a maioria dos estudos (n=18) constata que o uso de Blundes reduziu significativamente a taxa de Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica, com impacto na redução da mortalidade, no tempo de internação e nos custos hospitalares. Os principais componentes de escolha para composição do pacote de cuidado foram à elevação da cabeceira e o protocolo de higiene oral. Conclusão: Apesar de existir espaço para estudos com maior grau de recomendação, o rol de evidências de muitos países indica que o uso de Bundles tem efeito positivo na prevenção da pneumonia associada a ventilação mecânica e também na melhoria de desempenho institucional, pela redução de custos hospitalares.

Comparative efficacy of doripenem versus meropenem for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Doripenem shows good in vitro activity against common nosocomial pathogens, such as extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. However, the use of doripenem for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between doripenem and meropenem for patients with HAP or VAP.

METHODS

Adult patients diagnosed with HAP and VAP at National Taiwan University Hospital, who received doripenem or meropenem for more than 48 h between January 2015 and November 2017, were retrospectively reviewed. All-cause mortality on the 30th day was used as the primary outcome measurements.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients with doripenem and 252 patients with meropenem were analyzed. Compared to the meropenem group, the doripenem group was younger and had a higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that presence of solid organ malignancies (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.82; 95% CI, 1.04-3.19, p = 0.003) and SOFA score (AHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17, p = 0.003) were independent factors associated with mortality. There was no survival difference of 30-day mortality between patients receiving doripenem and meropenem for HAP or VAP (log-rank p = 0.113). However, a poorer outcome was observed among patients with hematological disease in the doripenem group (log-rank p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that doripenem has similar efficacy as meropenem in HAP or VAP patients. With an aim to enhance antibiotic diversity, doripenem could be an alternative choice for patients with HAP or VAP, except for those with hematological malignancies.

Strategies for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: an integrative review

ABSTRACT Objective: to identify studies about strategies for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia deployed in health services and classify their level of evidence. Method: integrative review of the literature, in 7 databases, which included the following descriptors: Prevention and Control AND Pneumonia Ventilator-Associated AND Intensive Care Units AND Bundle AND Patient Care. Results: twenty-three scientific productions were included. Of the preventive measures identified, 9 (39.1%) correspond from three to five strategies. The most frequent were: 22 (95.6%) lying with head elevated, 19 (82.6%) oral hygiene with chlorhexidine and 14 (60.8%) reduction of sedation whenever possible. Final Consideration: the application of measures based on scientific evidence is proven to be effective when carried out in conjunction, impacting the reduction of the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Application of a ventilator associated pneumonia prevention guideline and outcomes: A quasi-experimental study

OBJECTIVE

Ventilator associated pneumonia is the most frequent health-care-associated infection in Intensive Care Units, causing increased antibiotic consumption and resistance, length of stay, plus multiple health and economic costs. The aim of the study was to assess whether a customised guideline implementation would improve ventilator-associated pneumonia incidence and associated intensive care outcomes.

DESIGN

This was a quasi-experimental, before-after study consisting of pre-intervention, intervention and post-intervention periods.

SETTING

Three intensive care units at a well-known Portuguese hospital centre.

INTERVENTION

A set of eight recommendations was implemented after a guideline adaptation process.

PATIENTS

Adult patients admitted to the intensive care units over the study periods, aged 18 years or older and under invasive ventilation through an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy cannula.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data related to patient characterisation, guideline compliance and health outcomes were analysed. From a population of 1970 patients, a study sample of 828 was studied. Compliance with the recommendations was high. We identified a significant reduction in the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in two of the units (p = 0.020 and p = 0.001) and a reduction in duration of invasive ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay and mortality in all the three units. We found associations between some recommendations and the implementation of the set of recommendations and intensive care unit length of stay, duration of invasive ventilation and mortality.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of an evidence-based, locally customised guideline may improve ventilator associated pneumonia incidence and several outcomes.

What is new in the prevention of nosocomial pneumonia in the ICU?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize and contextualize recent evidence on preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

RECENT FINDINGS

Many centers continue to report dramatic decreases in VAP rates after implementing ventilator bundles. Interpreting these reports is complicated, however, by the subjectivity and lack of specificity of VAP definitions. More objective data suggest VAP rates may not have meaningfully changed over the past decade. If so, this compels us to re-examine and revise the prevention bundles we have been using to prevent VAP. New analyses suggest that most hospitals' ventilator bundles include a mix of helpful and potentially harmful elements. Spontaneous awakening trials, spontaneous breathing trials, head-of-bed elevation, and thromboprophylaxis appear beneficial. Oral chlorhexidine and stress ulcer prophylaxis may be harmful. Subglottic secretion drainage, probiotics, and novel endotracheal cuff designs do not clearly improve objective outcomes. Selective digestive decontamination by contrast appears to lower VAP and mortality rates. Effective implementation is as important as choosing the right bundle components. Best practices include engaging and educating staff, creating structures that facilitate bundle adherence, and providing regular feedback on process measure performance and outcome rates.

SUMMARY

VAP rates may still be elevated despite multiple reports to the contrary. Recent evidence suggests new ways to optimize the selection of ventilator bundle components and their implementation.

Ventilator Bundle Compliance and Risk of Ventilator-Associated Events

OBJECTIVE

Ventilator bundles encompass practices that reduce the risk of ventilator complications, including ventilator-associated pneumonia. The impact of ventilator bundles on the risk of developing ventilator-associated events (VAEs) is unknown. We sought to determine whether decreased compliance to the ventilator bundle increases the risk for VAE development.

DESIGN

Nested case-control study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at 6 adult intensive care units at an academic tertiary-care center in Tennessee.

PATIENTS

In total, 273 patients with VAEs were randomly matched in a 1:4 ratio to controls by mechanical ventilation duration and ICU type.

METHODS

Controls were selected from the primary study population at risk for a VAE after being mechanically ventilated for the same number of days as a specified case. Using conditional logistic regression analysis, overall cumulative compliance, and compliance with individual components of the bundle in the 3 and 7 days prior to VAE development (or the control match day) were examined.

RESULTS

Overall bundle compliance at 3 days (odds ratio [OR], 1.15; P=.34) and 7 days prior to VAE diagnosis (OR, 0.96; P=.83) were not associated with VAE development. This finding did not change when limiting the outcome to infection-related ventilator-associated complications (IVACs) and after adjusting for age and gender. In the examination of compliance with specific bundle components increased compliance with chlorhexidine oral care was associated with increased risk of VAE development in all analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventilator bundle compliance was not associated with a reduced risk for VAEs. Higher compliance with chlorhexidine oral care was associated with a greater risk for VAE development.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:637–643

National bundle care program implementation to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care units in Taiwan

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

This study investigated the impact of implementing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) bundle care on the rates of VAP in intensive care units (ICUs) in Taiwan.

METHODS

A total of 10 ICUs (bed number, 170), including surgical (SICUs) (n = 7), cardiovascular/surgical (CV/S-ICUs) (n = 1), and medical ICUs (MICUs) (n = 2) from 10 hospitals (7 medical center hospitals and 3 regional hospitals) were enrolled in this quality-improvement project. This study was divided into the pre-intervention phase (1st January, 2012-31st July, 2013) and the intervention phase (1st August, 2013-31st October, 2014).

RESULTS

Among the 10 hospitals, the overall rates (cases per 1000 ventilator-days) of VAP declined significantly (p = 0.005; rate ratio, 0.71) from 1.9 in the pre-intervention period to 1.5 in the intervention period. Significant difference in VAP rates between these periods was found in the regional hospitals (from 1.6 to 0.7; p < 0.001) and the SICUs (from 2.1 to 1.4; p < 0.001), but not in the medical centers (2.0 vs. 1.9; p = 0.0667) or CV/S-ICUs (4.5 vs. 4.5; p = 0.5391). However, VAP rate increased significantly (cases per 1000 ventilator-days) in the MICUs between the two periods (from 0.5 to 1.0; p = 0.0489). For the VAP bundle care elements, the overall compliance rate was 87.7% with 83.6% and 97.9% in the medical centers and regional hospitals, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing VAP bundle care has effectively reduced VAP in Taiwanese ICUs, but differences in performance and compliance rates of VAP bundle care among the different ICUs and hospital categories did exist.

Antibiotic consumption and ventilator-associated pneumonia rates, some parallelism but some discrepancies

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common infection in intensive care units (ICUs) but its clinical definition is neither sensitive nor specific and lacks accuracy and objectivity. New defining criteria were proposed in 2013 by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) in order to more accurately conduct surveillance and track prevention progress. Although there is a consistent trend towards a decrease in VAP incidence during the last decade, significant differences in VAP rates have been reported and are persistently lower in NHSN and other American reports (0.0 to 4.4 VAP per 1,000 ventilator-days in 2012) compared to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) data (10 VAP per 1,000 ventilator-days in 2014). In the United States, VAP has been proposed as an indicator of quality of care in public reporting, and the threat of financial penalties for this diagnosis has put pressure on hospitals to minimize VAP rates that may lead to artificial lower values, independently of patient care. Although prevention bundles may contribute for encouraging reductions in VAP incidence, both pathophysiologic and epidemiologic factors preclude a zero-VAP rate. It would be expected from the trend of reduction of VAP incidence that the consumption of antibiotics would also decrease in particular in those hospitals with lowest VAP rates. However, ICU reports show a steadily use of antibiotics for nosocomial pneumonia in 15% of patients and both ECDC and NHSN data on antibiotic consumption showed no significant trend. Knowledge of bacterial epidemiology and resistance profiles for each ICU has great relevance in order to understand trends of antibiotic use. The new NHSN criteria provide a more objective and quantitative data based VAP definition, including an antibiotic administration criterion, allowing, in theory, a more comprehensive assessment and a reportable benchmark of the observed VAP and antibiotic consumption variability.