Prospective study of the septocutaneous radial free flap and suprafascial donor site

Challenges in Radial Forearm Free Flap Surgery: A Comprehensive Case Analysis of Septic Complications at the Donor Site

ABSTRACT

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) has emerged as a leading option for microvascular reconstruction of head and neck soft-tissue defects. Despite the favorable outcomes conferred by RFFFs, complications such as skin graft loss and tendon exposure can occur. We present the case of a 77-year-old man who underwent RFFF reconstruction after excision of squamous cell carcinoma from the head and neck. The patient subsequently developed flexor tenosynovitis, septic arthritis of the wrist, and osteomyelitis of several carpal bones as a direct result of partial skin graft loss and prolonged tendon exposure at the donor site. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of this specific complication. Review of the literature reveals the need for continued research into RFFF donor site complications to mitigate the incidence of significant morbidity.

Full-thickness skin graft versus split-thickness skin graft for radial forearm free flap donor site closure: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) serves as a workhorse for a variety of reconstructions. Although there are a variety of surgical techniques for donor site closure after RFFF raising, the most common techniques are closure using a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) or a full-thickness skin graft (FTSG). The closure can result in wound complications and function and aesthetic compromise of the forearm and hand. The aim of the planned systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the wound-related, function-related and aesthetics-related outcome associated with full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG) and split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) in radial forearm free flap (RFFF) donor site closure.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines will be followed. Electronic databases and platforms (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)) and clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, the German Clinical Trials Register, the ISRCTN registry, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) will be searched using predefined search terms until 15 January 2024. A rerun of the search will be carried out within 12 months before publication of the review. Eligible studies should report on the occurrence of donor site complications after raising an RFFF and closure of the defect. Included closure techniques are techniques that use full-thickness skin grafts and split-thickness skin grafts. Excluded techniques for closure are primary wound closure without the use of skin graft. Outcomes are considered wound-, functional-, and aesthetics-related. Studies that will be included are randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective and retrospective comparative cohort studies. Case-control studies, studies without a control group, animal studies and cadaveric studies will be excluded. Screening will be performed in a blinded fashion by two reviewers per study. A third reviewer resolves discrepancies. The risk of bias in the original studies will be assessed using the ROBINS-I and RoB 2 tools. Data synthesis will be done using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4.1. If appropriate, a meta-analysis will be conducted. Between-study variability will be assessed using the I2 index. If necessary, R will be used. The quality of evidence for outcomes will eventually be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

DISCUSSION

This study's findings may help us understand both closure techniques' complication rates and may have important implications for developing future guidelines for RFFF donor site management. If available data is limited and several questions remain unanswered, additional comparative studies will be needed.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

The protocol was developed in line with the PRISMA-P extension for protocols and was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 17 September 2023 (registration number CRD42023351903).

Surgical outcomes of suprafascial and subfascial radial forearm free flaps in head and neck reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Conventional radial forearm free flaps (RFFFs) are known to be safe, but can result in donor site complications. Based on our experiences with suprafascial and subfascial RFFFs, we evaluated the safety of flap survival and surgical outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of head and neck reconstructions using RFFFs from 2006 to 2021. Thirty-two patients underwent procedures using either subfascial (group A) or suprafascial (group B) dissection for flap elevation. Data were collected on patient characteristics, flap size, and donor and recipient complications, and the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Thirteen of the 32 patients were in group A and 19 were in group B. Group A included 10 men and three women, with a mean age of 56.15 years, and group B included 16 men and three women, with a mean age of 59.11 years. The mean defect areas were 42.83 cm² and 33.32 cm², and the mean flap sizes were 50.96 cm² and 44.54 cm² in groups A and B, respectively. There were 13 donor site complications: eight (61.5%) in group A and five (26.3%) in group B. Flexor tendon exposure occurred in three patients in group A and in none in group B. All flaps survived completely. A recipient site complication occurred in two patients (15.4%) in group A and three patients (15.8%) in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications and flap survival were similar between the two groups. However, tendon exposure at the donor site was less prevalent in the suprafascial group, and the treatment period was shorter. Based on our data, suprafascial RFFF is a reliable and safe procedure for reconstruction of the head and neck.

Indications and outcomes for 100 patients managed with a pectoralis major flap within a UK maxillofacial unit

There are few studies reporting the role of the pedicled pectoralis major (PPM) flap in modern maxillofacial practice. The outcomes of 100 patients (102 flaps) managed between 1996 and 2012 in a UK maxillofacial unit that preferentially practices free tissue reconstruction are reported. The majority (88.2%) of PPM flaps were for oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), stage IV (75.6%) disease, and there was substantial co-morbidity (47.0% American Society of Anesthesiologists 3 or 4). The PPM flap was the preferred reconstruction on 80.4% of occasions; 19.6% followed free flap failure. Over half of the patients (57%) had previously undergone major surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy. Ischaemic heart disease (P=0.028), diabetes mellitus (P=0.040), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection (P=0.013) were independently associated with flap loss (any degree). Free flap failure was independently associated with total (2.0%) and major (6.9%) partial flap loss (P=0.044). Cancer-specific 5-year survival for stage IV primary SCC and salvage surgery improved in the second half (2005-2012) of the study period (22.2% vs. 79.8%, P=0.002, and 0% vs. 55.7%, P=0.064, respectively). There were also declines in recurrent disease (P=0.008), MRSA (P<0.001), and duration of admission (P=0.014). The PPM flap retains a valuable role in the management of advanced disease combined with substantial co-morbidity, and following free flap failure.

The microvascular thenar flap as a new possibility for super-thin soft tissue reconstruction in the oral cavity--initial clinical results

We report the first clinical use of a free microvascular thenar flap for reconstruction of intraoral soft tissues. In 9 patients with a recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), a new primary oral SCC, or a defect of the hard palate after radiotherapy, we covered the soft tissue defect, after resection of the tumour or local preparation, with a microvascular thenar flap. All patients had had combined resection and irradiation for treatment of the initial tumour. In every case the thenar flap was harvested from the left forearm. Arteries were anastomosed to cervical arteries on either side. The veins were anastomosed to the deep jugular or subclavian vein. Patients were followed up clinically after 3, 6, and 12 months and radiologically every 6 months. The mean length of the pedicle was 21 cm. The mean width of the flap was 27 mm (range 24-30) and the mean length 37 mm (range 26-49). All anastomoses worked well. All flaps healed without major complications. A thin but stable layer of soft tissue resulted in every case. All patients were able to wear their prostheses. Good functional and aesthetic results were seen at each follow-up visit, and there were no signs of relapse. The microvascular thenar flap is well-suited for reconstruction of thin layers of soft tissue in the oral cavity. The long pedicle and hairlessness are also ideal for covering intraoral defects after previous operations and in necks with few if any vessels. Primary wound closure is possible in many cases.

Comparison of sensory recovery at the subfascial and suprafascial donor sites of the free radial flap

The radial flap may be raised using a subfascial or suprafascial approach. The latter donor site is associated with fewer healing complications. We retrospectively evaluated the quality of sensory recovery within two comparable groups of 30 patients with subfascial and suprafascial donor sites. When considering the two groups, two-point discrimination was the modality most commonly reduced, with 97% of patients in both groups having reduced sensation in at least one anatomical zone. Sensation of sharp touch was most often lost; 90% in the subfascial and 83% in the suprafascial groups lost sensation in at least one anatomical zone. Roughly half the patients had reduced perception of light touch (43% and 50%), whilst perception of heat (27% and 17%) and cold (33% and 27%) were lost least often. At least one modality in at least one anatomical zone was lost or reduced in all patients, and roughly two-thirds (73% and 63%) had a reduction in 3 or more. The only significant difference between the donor and non-donor arms was reduced perception of sharp touch in the anterior forearm in both groups (p<0.001). Perception at the two sites (including the anatomical snuff box) was similar except for superior thenar palmar light touch (p=0.015) in the suprafascial group, which may indicate injury to the thenar cutaneous sensory branches during subfascial dissection.

A comparison of full and split thickness skin grafts in radial forearm donor sites

To formally evaluate the functional and aesthetic outcomes between full versus split thickness skin graft coverage of radial forearm free flap donor sites. A retrospective chart review of 47 patients who underwent pedicled or free radial forearm free flap reconstruction from May 1997 to August 2004 was performed. Comparisons were made between patients who had donor site coverage with split thickness skin grafts (STSG) or full thickness skin grafts (FTSG). There was no statistically significant difference between the STSG and FTSG in the number of post-operative dressings, incidence of tendon exposure, time to healing at the skin graft donor site, and time to healing at the skin graft recipient site. The questionnaire data showed there was a trend toward higher scores with the radial forearm scar aesthetics and satisfaction in the FTSG group. Full thickness skin graft coverage of radial forearm free flap donor site is superior to split thickness skin graft coverage in terms of aesthetic outcome, and has no statistically significant difference in terms of tendon exposure, time to healing at the skin graft donor site, time to healing at the skin graft recipient site, or post operative pain.

Review of the radial free flap: is it still evolving, or is it facing extinction? Part one: soft-tissue radial flap

The versatile fasciocutaneous radial flap is robust and reliable, straightforward to harvest, and often produces a satisfactory reconstruction with relatively little long-term morbidity at the donor site. Many surgeons prefer to use a limited number of trusted flaps, and these qualities will ensure that in the intermediate future most surgical trainees will continue to be shown the fasciocutaneous radial flap as both the basic training flap and the established option for reconstruction. Evidence from observational clinical studies and one randomised clinical trial indicates that there is increasing support for the use of the evolutionary technique of suprafascial dissection to minimise morbidity at the donor site. The suprafascial donor site may be repaired with either a meshed or unmeshed partial-thickness skin graft, or a fenestrated full-thickness skin graft, with good rates of successful healing. The application of a negative pressure dressing to the wound seems to facilitate the healing of all types of skin graft. The subfascial donor site, however, remains more prone to complications. It may be helpful to position the donor site of the flap more proximally, but this has not been proven. These refinements probably produce the best outcomes that can currently be achieved, given the inherent flaws of the radial donor site.