Tracheostomy versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants with Robin sequence: a comparative cost analysis

Cost Analysis of Avoiding Gastrostomy Tube in Robin Sequence Neonates that Undergo Mandibular Distraction

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate costs associated with perioperative gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement for neonates with Robin sequence (PRS) that undergo mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO).

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was performed to examine the medical records of neonates with RS who received treatment at our institution between 2012 and 2021. Patients under 6 months of age that underwent MDO for RS were included. Billing records of hospital costs over a 2-year period were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study included 26 total patients with 11 in the MDO-only group, 9 in G-tube after MDO group, and 6 in G-tube before MDO group. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in total hospital costs between groups with MDO-only group averaging $119,532 (SD± $$ \pm $$ 33,503), the G-tube after MDO group averaging $245,315 (SD± $$ \pm $$ 102,327), and G-tube before MDO group averaging $252,300 (SD± $$ \pm $$ 84,990). Multiple linear regression was performed controlling for genetic syndrome and birth weight, which still showed a statistically significant difference in total cost between the MDO-only group and G-tube after MDO (p = 0.006), and between the MDO-only group and G-tube prior to MDO (p = 0.01). There was a significant difference in costs between all three groups for total inpatient/outpatient costs with MDO-only group averaging $78,502 (SD± $$ \pm $$ 30,953), the G-tube after MDO group averaging $176,125 (SD± $$ \pm $$ 84,315), and the G-tube prior to MDO group averaging $156,309 (SD± $$ \pm $$ 95,746).

CONCLUSIONS

MDO performed without perioperative G-tube placement may reduce charges by >$100,000. The associated improvement of dysphagia after MDO surgery and potential for avoiding a G-tube has tremendous downstream cost and social benefits for families.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 2024.

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in children with Pierre Robin sequence: long-term analysis of teeth and jaw growth

Treatment of children with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) having a hypoplastic mandible and upper airway distress after birth may consist of external distraction devices. Shape anomalies of the permanent molars and positional changes due to surgery have been documented. The aim of this study is to compare the long-term effects (>5 years) on the growth pattern of PRS-patients treated with an external mandibular distraction device with no-surgery cases and to investigate the dental development or damage. A retrospective cohort study was performed. PRS-patients with and without surgery were included. A digital cephalometric analysis was made to evaluate the growth pattern of the mandible between groups as well as with normal values. Nine of 19 patients underwent an external mandibular distraction. All children were extubated after 4-5 days with no signs of respiratory distress. Screw and device loosening presented in one patient. The articular and sellar angles were significantly larger and smaller, respectively, in the Surgery group. Mandibular distraction surgery might result in a 'growth boost' compared to the No-surgery group. No significant difference in dental development was found. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis is an effective way of relieving severe upper airway obstruction.

Prognostic Risks for Tracheostomy in Pierre Robin Sequence: A Cohort From a Tertiary Hospital in Thailand

BACKGROUND

Pierre Robin sequence (PRS), characterized by micrognathia, glossoptosis, cleft palate, and obstructed airways, is one of the craniofacial conditions challenging various approaches to managing compromised airways, ranging from conservative measures to invasive airway surgery. This study was conducted to identify predictive risk factors for tracheostomy in the PRS.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted at a tertiary referral hospital in Thailand. Children diagnosed with PRS from January 2010 to December 2021 were enrolled. Univariate and multivariate analysis methods were used to identify the risk factors.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients with PRS were identified in electronic medical records, but 6 were excluded. Thirteen of the remaining 59 patients underwent tracheostomy. There were no significant differences in sex, preterm gestational age, cleft palate, associated syndromes, chromosome abnormalities, or cardiac or neurological involvement between patients who received tracheostomy and those who did not. However, patients with oropharyngeal dysfunction who received tracheostomy tended to use a nasogastric tube or percutaneous gastrostomy 92.3% of the time ( P = 0.043). In addition, patients with abnormal airways from endoscopy were more likely to undergo tracheostomy (odds ratio, 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-3.90). Interestingly, patients with a sum of Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes <15 were more likely to undergo tracheostomy (adjusted odds ratio, 9.91; 95% CI, 1.32-74.52). Furthermore, patients with at least 3 identified comorbidities were more likely to undergo tracheostomy (adjusted odds ratio, 11.34; 95% CI, 1.16-111.15).

CONCLUSIONS

The need for tracheostomy depends on comorbidities, Apgar scores, and abnormal airway anatomy. Feeding methods can become more complex with tracheostomy. Prognostic risk factors can help guide treatment and counseling for health care workers and caregivers.

Minimally-invasive airway management and early cleft palate repair in infants born with Robin sequence

The objective of this study was to report outcomes of early cleft palate repair in infants born with Robin sequence (RS). A retrospective case series in a tertiary referral paediatric hospital was carried out, examining a consecutive series of 69 infants born with RS and cleft palate. A minimally invasive approach was taken to upper airway obstruction, with liberal nasopharyngeal airway (NPA) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) use, guided by sleep studies. The palate was repaired between 6 and 9 months with a modified Malek technique. The most frequently used airway adjunct (59.4% of patients) was an NPA and the median duration of use was 5.6 months. All patients underwent a modified Malek cleft palate repair at a median of 7 months of age. Overnight oximetry demonstrated higher mean oxygen saturation (SpO2) across the group from initial neonatal admission to discharge (median 96.5% (interquartile range [IQR] 95-98%) vs 97.45% (IQR 96.5-98%) (P = 0.2, N = 34). Of those with a cardiorespiratory polysomnogram, the obstructive apnoea-hypopnea index (OAHI) was significantly lower postoperatively (5.9 vs 2.8, P = 0.028). This study supports the use of non-surgical airway strategies and early cleft palate repair in infants born with RS and cleft palate.

Comprehensive Long-Term Outcomes Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis

OBJECTIVE

To describe long-term outcomes and complications following mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) in a diverse patient cohort.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Single tertiary-care pediatric center.

PATIENTS

Forty-eight patients previously undergoing MDO with minimum 4-year follow-up.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Respiratory outcomes, feeding patterns, dental development, motor/sensory nerve function, temporo-mandibular joint function, and postsurgical scarring.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients with a median age of 7 years were evaluated. Of 20 nonsyndromic patients, none required additional airway procedures, none required continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during sleep, and 19 (95%) fed exclusively by mouth. Among 26 syndromic patients, 7 (27%) required CPAP and 8 (31%) were tube fed. Permanent first molar differences were seen in the majority of subjects; patterns of damage interfering with function were more common in syndromic (13/28, 46%) compared to nonsyndromic (5/24, 21%; P = .014) subjects. MDO prior to age two was associated with more frequent and worse dental damage (P = .001). Inferior alveolar nerve and marginal mandibular nerve function were fully intact in 37 (80%) and 39 (85%) of patients, respectively. Three patients (6%), all with associated genetic syndromes, demonstrated severe nerve impairment. By the Vancouver scar scale, ≥ 80% of surgical scars were rated in the most favorable category for each quality assessed. Temporomandibular joint dysfunction was rare.

CONCLUSIONS

MDO shows highly favorable long-term respiratory, feeding, nerve, and scar outcomes in nonsyndromic patients, although permanent molar changes not precluding tooth viability are commonly seen. Patients with associated syndromes demonstrate respiratory and feeding benefits, but higher rates of dental and nerve abnormalities.

Transfacial Two-pin External Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: A Technique for Neonatal Airway Obstruction from Robin Sequence

Surgical management in those with moderate-to-severe airway obstruction includes tongue-lip adhesion, tracheostomy, and/or mandibular distraction osteogenesis. This article describes a transfacial two-pin external device technique for mandibular distraction osteogenesis, utilizing minimal dissection.

Methods

The first percutaneous pin is transcutaneously placed just inferior to the sigmoid notch parallel to the interpupillary line. The pin is then advanced through the pterygoid musculature at the base of the pterygoid plates, toward the contralateral ramus, and exits the skin. A second parallel pin is placed spanning the bilateral mandibular parasymphysis distal to the region of the future canine. With the pins in place, bilateral high ramus transverse corticotomies are performed. Using univector distractor devices, the length of activation varies, with the goal of overdistraction to achieve a class III relationship of the alveolar ridges. Consolidation is limited to a 1:1 period with the activation phase, and removal is performed by cutting and pulling the pins out of the face.

Results

To guide optimal transcutaneous pin placement, transfacial pins were then placed through twenty segmented mandibles. Mean upper pin (UP) distance was 20.7 ± 1.1 mm from the tragus. The distance between the cutaneous entry of the UP and lower pin was 23.5 ± 0.9 mm, and the tragion-UP-lower pin angle was 118.7 ± 2.9°.

Conclusions

The two-pin technique has potential advantages regarding nerve injury and mandibular growth, given an intraoral approach with limited dissection. It may safely be performed on neonates whose small size may preclude the use of internal distractor devices.

Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis for Tongue-Based Airway Obstruction Without Micrognathia

PURPOSE

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) effectively treats tongue-based airway obstruction (TBAO) in micrognathic patients with Robin Sequence. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis may also address TBAO in certain nonmicrognathic patients who have severe obstructive apnea, although there is no current literature to guide MDO use in these atypical patients. This study describes outcomes of MDO in a series of patients with TBAO without micrognathia.

METHODS

Patients who underwent MDO for TBAO from 2013-20 were reviewed, and patients with micrognathia were excluded. Study subjects received baseline/follow up polysomnography. Polysomnography variables, including Obstructive Apnea Hypopnea Index, oxyhemoglobin saturation nadir (SpO2 nadir), percent sleep time end tidal CO2 greater than 50 mm Hg (%ETCO2 > 50), and respiratory-related arousals were compared before and after MDO. Demographics, syndromic/cleft palate status, airway anomalies, respiratory support, and feeding outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-four patients underwent MDO during this study period; 5 were nonmicrognathic and included in analysis. Sixty percent (n = 3) of the cohort was syndromic: 1 patient each had Trisomy 9, Beckwith Wiedemann syndrome, and duplicated pituitary gland plus syndrome. Forty percent (n = 2) of patients had a cleft palate, 60% (n = 3) had laryngomalacia, and 40% had tracheomalacia. Median (range) age at MDO was 53 days (47-167 days), and median length of distraction was 16 mm (14-20 mm). After MDO, median Obstructive Apnea Hypopnea Index decreased from x̃ = 60.7/h (11.6-109.4) to x̃ = 5.3/h (3.5-19.3) (P = 0.034). SpO2 nadir increased (69% [58-74] to 85% [80-88], P = 0.011), and median %ETCO2 > 50 mm Hg decreased (5.8% [5.2-30.1] to 0.0% [0.0-1.3], P ≤ 0.043). Continuous positive airway pressure was used by all patients immediately after MDO, and at 6 months postoperatively, 1 patient remained on continuous positive airway pressure and 1 patient required supplemental oxygen. At last follow up, no patients had significant residual airway obstruction or required a tracheostomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis can effectively treat severe TBAO in some patients without micrognathia that would otherwise be candidates for tracheostomy. When used in select patients, MDO significantly improves obstructive sleep apnea and reduces need for ventilatory support, although feeding support is still needed in most patients at 6 months. Further study in a larger cohort will help identify appropriate candidates for MDO and characterize outcomes of unique patient populations.

Advantages and disadvantages of mandibular distraction in Robin sequence

Robin sequence (RS) is diagnosed in infants born with micrognathia, glossoptosis and varying degrees of upper airway obstruction (UAO). Due to the variable levels of hypoxia, severe breathing and feeding problems can occur. Treatment is determined by clinical severity, ranging from conservative interventions for mild cases to surgical interventions for severe cases. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) is a surgical technique that gradually lengthens the mandible after an osteotomy by using an internal or external distraction device, directly correcting the micrognathia. This review will focus on advantages and disadvantages of mandibular distraction in infants with RS.

Robin Sequence: Neonatal Mandibular Distraction

Pierre Robin sequence is defined by the clinical triad: mandibular hypoplasia, glossoptosis, and airway obstruction. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) is a standard treatment of Robin sequence associated with severe airway obstruction and is the only intervention that directly corrects the underlying anatomic pathologic condition. Compared with tongue-lip adhesion, MDO has demonstrated more success in treating airway obstruction in infants with Pierre Robin sequence, including patients with syndromic diagnoses and concomitant anomalies. This article provides a current, comprehensive review of neonatal mandibular distraction and offers treatment guidelines based on a combined surgical experience of more than 400 patients.

Paediatric oral & maxillofacial surgery

Children have differences in their physiology, anatomy and they are continuing to grow and develop. The management of pathology, trauma, deformity and upper airway obstruction in the young growing patient has to take into account these factors in the treatment planning for these conditions. It is important for Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeons to understand the potential impact of disease or injury on the developing facial skeleton and dentition. This chapter will provide an overview of the some of the major components of paediatric maxillofacial surgery and their management.

Surgical Management and Outcomes of Pierre Robin Sequence: A Comparison of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis and Tongue-Lip Adhesion

There is a paucity of literature directly comparing tongue-lip adhesion versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis in surgical treatment of patients with Pierre Robin sequence. This study comprehensively reviews the literature for evaluating airway and feeding outcomes following mandibular distraction osteogenesis and tongue-lip adhesion. A search was performed using the MEDLINE and Embase databases for publications between 1960 and June of 2017. English-language, original studies subjects were included. Extracted data included prevention of tracheostomy (primary airway outcome) and ability to feed exclusively by mouth (primary feeding outcome). A total of 67 studies were included. Ninety-five percent of subjects (657 of 693) treated with mandibular distraction osteogenesis avoided tracheostomy, compared to 89% of subjects (289 of 323) treated with tongue-lip adhesion. Eighty-seven percent of subjects (323 of 370) treated with mandibular distraction osteogenesis achieved full oral feeds at latest follow-up. Seventy percent of subjects (110 of 157) treated with tongue-lip adhesion achieved full oral feeds at latest follow-up. The incidence of second intervention for recurrent obstruction ranged from 4 to 6 percent in mandibular distraction osteogenesis studies, compared to a range of 22 to 45 percent in tongue-lip adhesion studies. Variability of patient selection, surgical techniques, outcomes measurement methods, and follow-up length across studies precluded meta-analysis of the data. Both mandibular distraction osteogenesis and tongue-lip adhesion are effective alternatives to tracheostomy for patients who fail conservative management and improve feeding. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis may be superior to tongue-lip adhesion in long-term resolution of airway obstruction and avoidance of gastrostomy, but is associated with notable complications.

Neonatal Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Reduces Cleft Palate Width and Lengthens Soft Palate, Influencing Palatoplasty in Patients With Pierre Robin Sequence

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of neonatal mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) on cleft dimensions and on early palatoplasty outcomes in patients with Pierre Robin Sequence (PRS). In a prospective cohort study that enrolled 24 nonsyndromic patients with PRS, 12 submitted to the MDO group and 12 patients not treated (non-MDO group), the authors compared patients for cleft palate dimensions through 7 morphometric measurements at the moment of palatoplasty and for early palatoplasty outcomes. At palatoplasty, the MDO group presented a significant shorter distance between the posterior nasal spines (PNS-PNS, P < 0.001) and between uvular bases (UB-UB, P < 0.001), representing a reduction in cleft palate width. They also had significant soft palate lengthening represented by a larger distance between UB and retromolar space (UB-RM, P < 0.001) and UB and PNS (UB-PNS, P = 0.014). Their UB moved away from the posterior wall of the nasopharynx (UB-NPH, P < 0.001). The MDO group had a length of operative time significantly shorter (P < 0.001) and no early palatoplasty complications compared with the non-MDO group. In conclusion, MDO acted as an orthopedic procedure that reduced cleft palate width and elongated the soft palate in patients with PRS. These modifications enabled a reduction of around 11% in the length of operative time of palatoplasty (P < 0.001).

Airway and Feeding Outcomes of Mandibular Distraction, Tongue-Lip Adhesion, and Conservative Management in Pierre Robin Sequence: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Pierre Robin sequence is characterized by mandibular retrognathia and glossoptosis resulting in airway obstruction and feeding difficulties. When conservative management fails, mandibular distraction osteogenesis or tongue-lip adhesion may be required to avoid tracheostomy. The authors' goal was to prospectively evaluate the airway and feeding outcomes of their comprehensive approach to Pierre Robin sequence, which includes conservative management, mandibular distraction osteogenesis, and tongue-lip adhesion.

METHODS

A longitudinal study of newborns with Pierre Robin sequence treated at a pediatric academic medical center between 2010 and 2015 was performed. Baseline feeding and respiratory data were collected. Patients underwent conservative management if they demonstrated sustainable weight gain without tube feeds, and if their airway was stable with positioning alone. Patients who required surgery underwent tongue-lip adhesion or mandibular distraction osteogenesis based on family and surgeon preference. Postoperative airway and feeding data were collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with Pierre Robin sequence were followed prospectively. Thirty-two percent had a syndrome. Ten underwent mandibular distraction osteogenesis, eight underwent tongue-lip adhesion, and 10 were treated conservatively. There were no differences in days to extubation or discharge, change in weight percentile, requirement for gastrostomy tube, or residual obstructive sleep apnea between the three groups. No patients required tracheostomy. The greatest reduction in apnea-hypopnea index occurred with mandibular distraction osteogenesis, followed by tongue-lip adhesion and conservative management.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful selection of which patients with Pierre Robin sequence need surgery, and of the most appropriate surgical procedure for each patient, can minimize the need for postprocedure tracheostomy. A comprehensive approach to Pierre Robin sequence that includes conservative management, mandibular distraction osteogenesis, and tongue-lip adhesion can result in excellent airway and feeding outcomes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Piezosurgery an Asset in Treatment of Pierre Robin Sequence

Pierre Robin sequence (formerly a syndrome) is named after the French stomatologist who, in 1923 and 1934, described the problems associated with micrognathia in newborn. It comprises mandibular micrognathia, U-shaped cleft palate, and glossoptosis. The typical symptoms are hypoxaemia, noisy breathing, snoring, stridor, cyanosis, bradycardia, feeding difficulties, and failure to thrive. Distraction osteogenesis has recently been considered as a surgical option for early intervention to lengthen the mandible and relieve respiratory problems. Piezosurgery offers a modality to make precise bone cuts preserving vital structures, minimizing the invasiveness of the surgical procedure, and offering bloodless field. We present case of 1-year-old male malnourished child with Pierre Robin sequence and tracheostomy in situ since day 11 of his birth. The staged treatment plan involving mandibular lengthening in which mandibular osteotomies were performed with the piezoelectric scalpel followed by decannulation of tracheostomy, which has been described in detail in this article.

Craniofacial disorders associated with airway obstruction in the neonate

In infants with craniofacial disorders, upper airway obstruction is one of the primary causes for morbidity and mortality in the neonatal period. Infants with craniofacial disorders, including Pierre Robin sequence, are at high risk for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Because of the complexity of their care, these neonates are usually followed by a multidisciplinary team to ensure timely evaluation and optimal treatment. In addition to history and physical examination, clinical evaluation may include genetic testing, imaging, endoscopy, and polysomnography. There are various treatment options, both surgical and non-surgical, that may be used depending on clinical assessment, underlying condition, and severity of disease. Recent advances have led to better assessment and treatment of these patients, but many questions remain. This review outlines the available literature pertaining to the evaluation and management of upper airway obstruction in the neonate with craniofacial conditions, with a particular focus on Pierre Robin sequence.

Infant Mandibular Distraction for Upper Airway Obstruction: A Clinical Audit

Background:

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) is an effective method of treating upper airway obstruction (UAO) in micrognathic infants. The short-term outcomes include relief of UAO, avoidance of tracheostomy, and prompt discharge from hospital. However, it is a significant surgical procedure with potential associated morbidities. This study describes a cohort of infants managed using MDO over a twelve-year period.

Methods:

A retrospective chart review was undertaken for children who had MDO before the age of 5 years between 2000 and 2012. This was followed by a clinical review of the same cohort specifically looking for dental anomalies, nerve injuries, and scar cosmesis.

Results:

Seventy-three children underwent MDO at a mean age of 2 months [interquartile range (IQR), 1.7–4.2] for nonsyndromic infants and 3.3 months (IQR, 2.1–7.4) for those with syndromes. Infants were discharged from hospital, on average, 15 days after procedure. After MDO, of the 9 who were previously tracheostomy dependent, 5 (56%) were decannulated within 12 months and none of the nontracheostomy-dependent children required further airway assistance. The majority of children required supplemental feeding preoperatively but, 12 months postoperatively, 97% of the nonsyndromic infants fed orally. Thirty-nine children (53%) were reviewed clinically [median age, 5.1 y (IQR, 3.9–6.5)] with 18 being syndromic. Many of the mandibular first permanent and second primary molars had developmental defects, but there was a low rate of neurosensory deficit and good scar cosmesis.

Conclusions:

This study contributes further to the evidence base underpinning the management of micrognathic infants with UAO.

Logistic regression analysis of Pierre Robin sequence patients requiring surgical intervention

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Determine predictive patient characteristics that guide the decision to proceed with surgical management of tongue-based airway obstruction (TBAO) in Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of PRS patients between 2005 and 2014 requiring observation in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

METHODS

Patient charts were reviewed for prenatal diagnoses, clinical course, and need for surgical intervention (tracheotomy or mandibular distraction osteogenesis), and the nonsurgical and surgical group were compared with a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight PRS patients who were identified with TBAO and required NICU observation had an average follow-up of 5.4 years. Associated anomalies identified in the PRS patients included neurologic disease (n = 6), renal abnormalities (n = 5), limb abnormalities (n = 4), and cardiac abnormalities (n = 12). Nonsurgical management of PRS TBAO included side (n = 12)/stomach positioning (n = 15), oral airway (n = 6), nasopharyngeal airway (NPA) (n = 14), and intubation (n = 12). Surgical intervention occurred in 13 patients, with tracheotomy in eight due to unstable airway, and mandible distraction in five due to NPA dependence. Factors with significant uncontrolled correlations with the need for surgical airways included presence of cardiac disease (P = .03), cardiac disease severity (P = .03), neurologic disease (P = .01), and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)/bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) use (P = .006). Further, stepwise regression showed strong predictive value for CPAP/BiPAP use (odds ratio [OR]: 10.43) and presence of neurological disease (OR: 9.16). PRS TBAO patients required multiple modalities of noninvasive surgical intervention to stabilize their airway.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified patient characteristics predictive of progression to a surgical airway to address TBAO, which may decrease healthcare utilization and improve quality of life for these families.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 127:945-949, 2017.

Craniofacial syndromes and sleep-related breathing disorders

Children with craniofacial syndromes are at risk of sleep disordered breathing, the most common being obstructive sleep apnea. Midface hypoplasia in children with craniosynostosis and glossoptosis in children with Pierre Robin syndrome are well recognized risk factors, but the etiology is often multifactorial and many children have multilevel airway obstruction. We examine the published evidence and explore the current management strategies in these complex patients. Some treatment modalities are similar to those used in otherwise healthy children such as adenotonsillectomy, positive pressure ventilation and in the refractory cases, tracheostomy. However, there are some distinct approaches such as nasopharyngeal airways, tongue lip adhesion, mandibular distraction osteogenesis in children with Pierre Robin sequence, and midface advancement in children with craniosynostoses. Clinicians should have a low threshold for referral for evaluation of sleep-disordered-breathing in these patients.

Pierre Robin sequence: review of diagnostic and treatment challenges

Pierre Robin sequence is not a rare condition and paediatric specialists caring for respiratory related issues are likely to encounter cases in their practice. There have been a few recent reviews on the topic, mostly focusing on the surgical interventions performed for cases with severe airway obstruction. In the present review, we will highlight the different challenges that remain today in the global evaluation of infants afflicted with this condition through a thorough review of the medical literature, giving the clinician a full scope of the disease and of the various management options. The need for an improved objective evaluation of airway obstruction and for a better classification will be emphasized. We are therefore proposing a novel classification scheme that will better account for respiratory and feeding difficulties in these infants. Finally, many knowledge gaps persist regarding this condition, underlining the necessity for further research both in the genetic field and regarding the outcome of therapy.

A pragmatic approach to infants with Robin sequence: a retrospective cohort study and presence of a treatment algorithm

Objectives

Initial approaches to and treatments of infants with Robin sequence (RS) is diverse and inconsistent. The care of these sometimes critically ill infants involves many different medical specialties, which can make the decision process complex and difficult. To optimize the care of infants with RS, we present our institution’s approach and a review of the current literature.

Material and methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 75 infants diagnosed with RS and managed at our institution in the 1996–2012 period. Additionally, the conducted treatment regimen in this paper was discussed with recent literature describing the approach of infants with RS.

Results

Forty-four infants (59 %) were found to have been treated conservatively. A significant larger proportion of nonisolated RS infants than isolated RS infants needed surgical intervention (53 vs. 25 %, p = .014). A mandibular distraction was conducted in 24 % (n = 18) of cases, a tracheotomy in 9 % (n = 7), and a tongue–lip adhesion in 8 % (n = 6). Seventy-seven percent of all infants had received temporary nasogastric tube feeding. The literature review of 31 studies showed that initial examinations and the indications to perform a surgical intervention varied and were often not clearly described.

Conclusions

RS is a heterogenic group with a wide spectrum of associated anomalies. As a result, the decisional process is challenging, and a multidisciplinary approach to treatment is desirable. Current treatment options in literature vary, and a more uniform approach is recommended.

Clinical Relevance

We provide a comprehensive and pragmatic approach to the analysis and treatment of infants with RS, which could serve as useful guidance in other clinics.

Piezosurgery: A new and safe technique for distraction osteogenesis in Pierre Robin sequence review of the literature and case report

INTRODUCTION

Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is characterized by microgenia and retrognathia. Cleft palate and glossoptosis are frequently associated with airway obstruction and difficulty in swallowing. Distraction osteogenesis with micro-distractors has recently been considered as a surgical option during the neonatal age.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 6-week-old female with PRS underwent mandibular lengthening in neonatal age. Mandibular osteotomies were performed with the piezoelectric scalpel.

DISCUSSION

Piezosurgery represents an innovative technique as it offers the maxillofacial surgeon the opportunity to make precise bone cuts without damaging the soft tissue, minimizing the invasiveness of the surgical procedure, and the opportunity of working in a field which is almost totally blood free.

CONCLUSION

The use of a piezoelectric device to perform this kind of surgery provides clinical and surgical results which would be difficult with traditional instruments, not only for the patient's benefit but also for the surgeon's. Preservation of the original bony structure, especially of the cancellous bone, will benefit the bone healing process due to its high estrogenic potential.